Skip to main content
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2026 Mar 26;14:1799183. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2026.1799183

Synthesis and host-guest chemistry of a thiophene-extended pillar[6]arene: toward applications in nitroaromatics removal and cell imaging

Tingting Chen 1,*, Fengqin Wang 1
PMCID: PMC13062300  PMID: 41970233

Abstract

Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the study of pillar [n]arenes; however, the development of their analogs remains underexplored, offering new opportunities for the discovery of functional materials. In this work, a luminescent thiophene-extended pillar [6]arene (TPExP6) featuring a π-rich cavity was designed and synthesized from 2,5-dibromothiophene and (4-formylphenyl)boronic acid via a five-step procedure with an overall yield of approximately 9.8%. This molecule combines an extended π-conjugated cavity with strong intrinsic emission, enabling it not only to form stable host–guest complexes with nitrobenzene derivatives for the effective removal of persistent nitroaromatic pollutants from water but also to be applied in tumor cell imaging. This achievement substantially advances the application of macrocyclic compounds in environmental protection and biomedical materials.

Keywords: cell imaging, host-guest chemistry, nitroaromatics sensing, pillar[6]arene, synthesis

Introduction

Macrocyclic compounds, characterized by their distinctive geometric structures and intriguing physicochemical properties, have garnered significant research interest in recent decades (Cai et al., 2025; Tang et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2025). Their emergence has not only accelerated the development of host–guest systems but also established a cornerstone for the advancement of supramolecular chemistry (Chen et al., 2024; Dishi et al., 2024; Han et al., 2023; Hua et al., 2022). Supramolecular chemistry and host-guest complexation have been profoundly advanced over the past decades, fueled by the design and development of a diverse range of synthetic macrocyclic hosts, among which crown ethers (Fang et al., 2019), cyclodextrins (Achkar et al., 2020), calixarenes (Nag and Rao, 2022), cucurbiturils (Liu et al., 2021) and pillar [n]arenes (Dai et al., 2025; Kato et al., 2023), represent landmark examples. The advent of each novel class of such hosts has consistently addressed fundamental challenges in host-guest chemistry, thereby continuously expanding the frontiers and enriching the scope of the entire discipline (Chen et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2022). Pillar [n]arenes, as the most classic category of macrocyclic molecules, are not only easily synthesized and functionalized but also possess diverse host-guest properties (Khalil-Cruz et al., 2021; Li M.-H. et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022; Wada et al., 2023). Pillar [n]arenes have shown multiple applications, such as biomedicine imaging (Zhang et al., 2023), environmentally responsive materials (Chen et al., 2025; Li et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2023), catalysis (Wang, et al., 2023a; Zhou et al., 2024), and fluorescence materials (Yan et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2023).

Supramolecular chemistry of pillar [n]arenes have been well investigated (Guo et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2020; Li W.-J. et al., 2021). However, pillar [n]arene analogs are not being exploited thoroughly. During the past 10 years, several novel pillararene derivatives with unique intrinsic structures, preorganized conformations, and attractive binding performances, such as biphen [n]arenes (Xu et al., 2022), leaning pillar [n]arenes (Wu et al., 2018), prism [n]arene (Yang and Jiang, 2020), geminiarene (Wu and Yang, 2019), fluoren [5]arenes (Wu et al., 2023) and so on, were reported. Despite these breakthroughs, there are still many bottlenecks to be addressed or strengthened. Firstly, pillar [n]arene-analogs with large cavity sizes usually have low yields. Secondly, macrocycles with extended π-conjugated and more electron-rich plane backbones are rarely reported (Wang et al., 2022a; Wang et al., 2022b; Wang et al., 2022c). Inspired by these, we assumed that merging the electron-rich thiophene unit into pillar [n]arene could generate a new class of macrocyclic hosts with extended cavity, extended π-conjugated plane and more electron-rich character. On the other hand, nitro-benzenes (NBs) play a crucial role as essential starting materials or intermediates in the synthesis of various compounds such as dyes, medicines, herbicidal agrochemicals, and rubber (Francisco et al., 2022; Khutorianskyi et al., 2016; Wu and Zhang, 2020). Due to the highly electronegative nature of fluorine and the electron-withdrawing properties of nitro-substituted groups, the degradation of NBs is extremely challenging. Consequently, the widespread use of NBs poses significant environmental risks and consequences (Zhao et al., 2023). Herein, we designed and synthesized an emissive thiophene extended pillar [6]arene (TPExP6) with a π-rich cavity. The pronounced sensitivity of the photophysical properties of TPExP6 toward NBs, together with its capacity to interact with electron-deficient substrates, enables its application not only as a host material for forming host–guest complexes with NBs but also as an effective material for the removal of trace amounts of nitrobenzene from aqueous solutions. More importantly, due to TPExP6’s strong fluorescence emission properties, it can also be further utilized for live-cell imaging.

Experiment section

Synthesis of compound A1

A mixture of 2,5-dibromothiophene (0.48 g, 2 mmol), 4-formylphenylboronic acid (0.72 g, 4.80 mmol), K2CO3 (0.70 g, 5 mmol), and N,N-dimethylformamide (5 mL) was stirred under a N2 atmosphere for 30 min. Then, tetrakis (triphenylphosphine)palladium (0.12 g, 0.1 mmol) was added, and the reaction was stirred at 100 °C for 12 h. After completion, the mixture was allowed to cool naturally, and the resulting orange suspension was filtered and extracted with chloroform. The crude product was purified by column chromatography to afford A1 as a brown solid (0.50 g, 84% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 10.02 (s, 2H, CH), 7.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 4H, ArH), 7.83–7.79 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.50 (s, 2H, Ha). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 190.32, 142.80, 138.40, 134.39, 134.13, 129.51, 125.27, 124.87.

Synthesis of compound A2

Compound A1 (1 g, 3.40 mmol) was dissolved in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran and methanol (V THF: V MeOH = 25 : 1; 52 mL). Sodium borohydride (1 g, 6 mmol) was added under ice-bath conditions. After reacting at room temperature for 30 min, deionized water was added to quench the reaction. The mixture was filtered and dried to afford a yellow solid, A2 (0.9 g, 0.3 mmol), in a yield of 90%.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): 7.65 (d, J = 8.2, 4H, ArH), 7.51 (s, 2H, Ha), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 5.28 (s, 2H, -OH), 4.52 (s, 4H, CH2).

Synthesis of compound A3

A suspension of compound A2 (1 g, 3.3 mmol) in carbon tetrachloride (250 mL) was prepared. A solution of PCl3 (3 mL, 33 mmol) in carbon tetrachloride (10 mL) was added dropwise under an ice bath. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After completion, the mixture was washed with brine, saturated ammonium bicarbonate solution, and brine again. Finally, compound A3 (0.56 g, 1.7 mmol) was obtained by column chromatography with a yield of 50%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H, ArH), 7.60 (s, 2H, Ha), 7.50 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H, ArH), 4.80 (s, 4H, CH2).

Synthesis of compound A4

Compound A3 (1.1 g, 3.3 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of dichloromethane, followed by the addition of aluminum trichloride (0.9 g, 66 mmol). A solution of p-diethoxy benzene (4.6 g, 33 mmol) in dichloromethane (30 mL) was then added dropwise. The reaction was allowed to proceed at room temperature for 1 h, quenched with deionized water, and finally purified by column chromatography to yield compound A4 (880 mg, 1.6 mmol) with a yield of 50%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.68 (s, 4H), 7.64–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.43–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.91–6.75 (m, 5H), 4.15 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 4.10 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 4.06 (s, 2H), 1.43 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 1.34 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 156.52, 152.15, 146.27, 137.88, 132.02, 129.24, 128.68, 126.27, 117.47, 115.33, 114.28, 65.36, 63.69, 34.95, 15.08, 14.71.

Preparation of compound TPExP6

Compound A4 (160 mg, 0.3 mmol) and paraformaldehyde (24 mg) were dissolved in dichloromethane (20 mL). Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (20 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature. After reacting for 25 min, the reaction was quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (10 mL). Column chromatography separation yielded compound TPExP6 (80 mg, 0.07 mmol) with a yield of 52%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.74 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.67 (m, 6H), 7.61–7.58 (m, 6H), 7.51 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 7.41 (s, 3H), 7.02 (s, 2H), 7.01 (s, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.08 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.0 Hz, 16H), 3.81 (s, 12H), 1.43 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 24H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 153.02, 152.93, 146.27, 137.88, 132.02, 130.61, 130.36, 128.68, 126.27, 123.26, 115.14, 114.86, 66.75, 34.95, 32.01, 14.53. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd. for C70H64O8S2Na [M + Na]+: 1231.52, found: 1231.46; C70H64O8S2K [M + K]+: 1247.49, found: 1247.51.

Materials and methods

All reagents (2,5-dibromothiophene, 4-formylphenylboronic acid, 4-formylphenylboronic acid, p-diethoxy benzene, et al.) were commercially available and used as supplied without further purification. Solvents were either employed as purchased or dried according to procedures described in the literature.

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVIII-400 MHz spectrometer. All NMR used tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. Bruker Micro-TOF spectrometer was used to investigate the High-resolution Mass (ESI) of the compounds. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-7000-Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. Confocal images were acquired using an Olympus FLUOVIEWFV1000-confocal laser scanning unit mounted on an IX81 fixed stage upright microscope. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigations were carried out on a JEOL6390LVinstrument. Single crystal X-ray data were obtained on a Bruker D8 X-ray single crystal Venture diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å). SAINT5.0 and SADABS S3 programs are used for the reduction and absorption correction of crystal data. The resolution and refinement of the crystal structure are obtained on the SHELXTL-97 software. Using the direct or Patterson methods, all non-hydrogen source coordinates are obtained by using the differential Fourier method and the least square method. Then the geometric method and the difference value are used. The hydrogen atom coordinates were obtained by Fourier method, and the crystal structure was obtained.

Results and discussion

Synthesis of TPExP6

Synthetic pathway of TPExP6 is outlined in Scheme 1. The synthesis commenced with a C–C coupling between 2,5-dibromothiophene and (4-formylphenyl)boronic acid, followed by reduction of the resulting aldehyde group. The resultant intermediate was then treated with phosphorus trichloride (PCl3) to afford intermediate A3. In the subsequent step, A3 was reacted with four equivalents of 1,4-diethoxybenzene in dichloromethane at room temperature, using aluminum trichloride (AlCl3) as a Lewis acid catalyst, leading to the formation of the hemicyclic derivative A4. Finally, TPExP6 was obtained by treating A4 with paraformaldehyde in dichloroethane under catalysis by boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3·O(C2H5)2) at ambient temperature.

SCHEME 1.

Chemical reaction scheme depicting the multistep synthesis of a compound labeled TPEX-P6 from 2,5-dibromothiophene and 4-formylphenylboronic acid, highlighting its applications in nitroaromatics removal and cell imaging, and showing related molecular structures and target nitroaromatic compounds.

Synthetic route of thiophene extended pillar [6]arene (TPExP6), crystal structure of monomer A4, and chemical structures of nitrobenzene derivatives studied in this work.

The crystal structure (Supplementary Figure S1) of the acyclic precursor A4 clearly shows two 1,4-diethoxybenzene units linked via methylene bridges to both sides of a thiophene core. In these units, the OCH2CH3 groups reside at ortho and meta positions relative to the bridging methylene carbon, placing them in distinct chemical environments. This inequivalence is confirmed by proton NMR measurements (Figure 1a), showing the splitting of the OCH2 and CH3 protons into distinct sets of signals (Haʹ/Haʺ and Hbʹ/Hbʺ, respectively). Upon cyclization to form the macrocycle TPExP6, the molecular symmetry increases, resulting in the coalescence of these split signals for the OCH2CH3 protons. Concurrently, the integration ratio of OCH2 protons to the bridging CH2 protons changes from 2:1 in precursor A4 to 4:3 in TPExP6. These 1H NMR observations collectively provide strong evidence for the successful formation of the cyclic structure TPExP6. Furthermore, the synthesis was unequivocally confirmed by ESI-TOF-MS analysis, where the spectrum of TPExP6 (Supplementary Figure S4) exhibited 2 m/z peaks of 1231.46 and 1247.51, which can be assigned to [M + Na]+ and [M + K]+ adducts, respectively.

FIGURE 1.

Two nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra are shown, each with an overlaid chemical structure highlighting labeled protons. Panel (a) displays a linear molecule with labeled hydrogen atoms Ha', Ha'', Hb', and Hb'' in black, while panel (b) shows a cyclic structure with Ha and Hb labeled in blue. Each spectrum features several sharp peaks with annotated assignments corresponding to the labeled protons in the chemical structures.

1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) of (a) A4 and (b) TPExP6. Ha and Hb were the protons of -CH2- and -CH3- on TPExP6, Ha’ and Ha” are the protons of -CH2- on A4, Hb’ and Hb” are the protons of -CH3- on A4.

Photophysical and self-assembly properties

Subsequently, the photophysical properties of TPExP6 were investigated. UV/Vis spectrum of TPExP6 in DMF exhibited an absorption maximum at around 330 nm (Supplementary Figure S5a). Fluorescence spectrum showed that TPExP6 displayed bright blue emission centered at approximately 410 nm in DMF solution (Figure 2a). The fluorescence intensity is stable, and the quantum yield was calculated to be Φ F = 28.2% (Supplementary Figures S5,S6; Supplementary Table S1). Upon gradual addition of water (a poor solvent) to the DMF solution, the fluorescence intensity decreased only slightly at water fractions below 30%. However, further increasing the water content led to a sharp decline in emission intensity, and when the water fraction exceeded 50%, the fluorescence was almost completely quenched (Figure 2a). This observation suggests that aggregate formation occurs at 50% water content, resulting in fluorescence quenching. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) data indicated the formation of TPExP6 particles with a broad size distribution ranging from 100 to 500 nm in a 50/50 (v/v) water/DMF mixture (Supplementary Figure S8a), while transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging clearly revealed the presence of larger, uniformly sized nanoparticle aggregates (Figure 2b).

FIGURE 2.

Panel (a) contains a fluorescence intensity versus wavelength line graph for various DMF to water ratios, with intensity decreasing as water content increases; an inset shows a cuvette with blue luminescent liquid. Panel (b) is a grayscale microscopy image showing small black and gray spots scattered on a light background with a scale bar indicating two micrometers.

(a) Fluorescence spectra of TPExP6 (1 μM) in different ratio of DMF/H2O. (b) TEM image of TPExP6 aggregate in 50/50 DMF/H2O mixture.

Host-guest chemistry

NBs pose severe risks to environmental safety and human health due to their high toxicity and persistence. Due to the electron-rich cavity of TPExP6, it can function as an excellent host to recognize host–guest complexation with NBs. Initially, the noncovalent interaction between TPExP6 and a representative NB, 4-nitrofluorobenzene (NFB), using NMR characterizations. The NMR spectra (Figures 3a–c) revealed a noticeable upfield shift of the protons on NFB, which can be attributed to the shielding effect resulting from its encapsulation within the cavity of TPExP6. Subsequently, to gain further insight into the specific intermolecular forces between NFB and TPExP6, the quenching processes were monitored by emission intensity changes in response to NFB addition.

FIGURE 3.

Panel (a) shows a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of para-nitrofluorobenzene, panel (b) shows the spectrum after complexation with a macrocyclic compound, and panel (c) shows the macrocycle alone, with molecular structures depicted. Panel (d) is a fluorescence intensity vs. wavelength plot demonstrating emission changes with increasing analyte concentration, accompanied by an inset showing solution color under UV light and a molecular structure. Panel (e) is a binding curve plotting fluorescence quenching ratio against analyte concentration, displaying nonlinear regression and binding constant value.

1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): (a) 3 mmol NFB; (b) 3 mmol TPExP6 and 3 mmol NFB; (c) 5 mmol TPExP6. (d) Fluorescence quenching of TPExP6 (1 μM) at different NFB concentrations in DMF. (e) Stern–Volmer plot of TPExP6 fluorescence quenching with NFB.

Figure 3d displays the gradual changes in the emission spectra of TPExP6 (1 μM) upon incremental addition of NFB. A notable reduction in fluorescence intensity was observed as the concentration of NFB increased. To further understand the binding characteristics of the TPExP6 NFB complex, the association constant (Ksv) was evaluated using the Stern–Volmer relationship: F0/F = 1 - K SV × [C], in which F0 (without the quencher) and F (with the quencher) are the fluorescence intensities and [C] denotes the concentration of NFB (Pérez-Márquez et al., 2022). The K SV derived from this analysis was determined to be 1.25 × 106 M-1, suggesting a strong noncovalent interaction between TPExP6 and NFB (Figure 3e).

Nitroaromatics removal

Employing an analogous experimental approach, we further investigated the host–guest interactions between TPExP6 and a series of NBs (Supplementary Figures S9-S14), including 4-nitro-2-(trifluoromethyl)acetanilide (FNB), picric acid (TNP), 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (4-NBD), 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NTy), 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid hydrate (2,4-NSH), 5,5'-disulfanediyl bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (5,5-S2NC), p-/m-/o-nitrophenol (p-NP, m-NP, o-NP), and 2-nitrobenzyl bromide (2NBB). As summarized in Supplementary Table S2, the binding constants (Ksv) for TPExP6 with these NBs were consistently greater than 103 M-1, indicating robust complexation in all cases. These results demonstrate that TPExP6, as a macrocyclic host, exhibits broad applicability and effective binding generality toward diverse nitroaromatic substrates (Nagarkar et al., 2013).

After confirming the host–guest complexation between TPExP6 and NBs, we further investigated the application of TPExP6 as a solid-phase material for removing trace-level NB pollutants from aqueous system. Firstly, the adsorption capacity of TPExP6 toward NFB, TNP, and FNB was thus evaluated. We submersed 1.00 mg TPExP6 into an aqueous solution of NBs (25 μg/mL, 100 mL). UV-Vis spectra were applied to monitor the pollutants removal efficiency. The peaks assigned to NBs decreased dramatically within the absorbance period, demonstrating the substantially decreased concentration of NBs (Figures 4a–c). The adsorption reaches the equilibrium in a short time (30 min), suggesting a rapid adsorption behavior. Quantitative analysis revealed that TPExP6 absorbs NFB, TNP, and FNB with capacities of 1210, 1050, and 810 mg/g, respectively (Figure 4d). For the trace amounts of NBs in water systems (1 μg/mL), TPExP6 achieved exceptional removal efficiencies of 99.9%, 99.2%, and 97.8% for these NBs. Furthermore, the removal efficiency was well maintained over five consecutive cycles without significant degradation (Figure 4e). These results collectively demonstrate the outstanding capability and reusability of TPExP6 for removing trace NFB, TNP, and FNB from water.

FIGURE 4.

Panel (a) shows a UV-Vis absorption spectrum with decreasing absorbance over time for a compound labeled with a nitro and fluorine-substituted benzene; panel (b) depicts a similar trend for a compound labeled with two nitro groups and a hydroxyl group; panel (c) features a compound with nitro, fluorine, and amide substituents, also with absorbance decreasing over time. Panel (d) presents a vertical bar chart comparing adsorption capacities for NFB, TNP, and FNB, with values labeled as 1210, 1050, and 810 mg/g, respectively. Panel (e) displays a grouped bar graph of removal efficiency percentages over five reuse cycles for NFB, TNP, and FNB, all maintaining high efficiency close to one hundred percent.

Uv-Vis spectra of 1.00 mg TPExP6 submersed into aqueous solution of NBs (25 μg/mL, 100 mL): (a) NFB, (b) TNP, (c) FNB. (d) Adsorption capacity of TPExP6 to NBs. (e) Removal efficiency of TPExP6 to trace amounts of NBs against reuse cycles.

Cell imaging

The strong fluorescence exhibited by TPExP6 motivated us to explore its suitability as a biomaterial for live-cell imaging applications (Tang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022d; Wang et al., 2023b). First, cytotoxicities toward HeLa cells and HL-7702 cells were evaluated using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Incubation with TPExP6 across a concentration range of 1.00–20 μg/mL for 4 h resulted in no significant reduction in cell viabilities, demonstrating favorable biocompatibility and minimal cytotoxicity (Figure 5a). Subsequently, TPExP6 was employed as a fluorescent probe for cellular imaging. Following a 4-h incubation period, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) observations revealed distinct intracellular blue fluorescence emission from TPExP6-treated HeLa cells, with the fluorescence primarily localized in the cytoplasm rather than the nucleus (Figure 5b). These results confirm that TPExP6 can function as an effective fluorescent agent for live-cell visualization.

FIGURE 5.

Bar chart labeled (a) shows cell viability percentages for HeLa and HL-7702 cells at varying concentrations from zero to twenty micrograms per milliliter, with both cell lines maintaining high viability. Panel (b) displays three images of cells: bright-field, blue fluorescence labeled TPEX P6, and an overlay combining both visualization methods, illustrating cellular localization of the blue fluorescence signal.

(a) Cell viabilities of HeLa and HL-7702 cells treated with TPExP6 against different concentrations. (b) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of HeLa cells cultivated with TPExP6 for 4h. [C] = 20 μg/mL. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Conclusion

In summary, a novel thiophene-extended pillar [6]arene (TPExP6) with electron-rich cavity and pronounced luminescent behavior was designed and prepared. This multifunctional macrocycle was efficiently constructed via a straightforward five-step synthetic route starting from commercially available precursors. The integration of an extended π-conjugated cavity with intense intrinsic emission endows TPExP6 with the ability to function as an effective host for nitrobenzene derivatives, forming stable host–guest complexes in solution. Notably, these complexes are stabilized through charge-transfer interactions, which also underpin the capability of TPExP6 to selectively capture and remove such recalcitrant nitroaromatic pollutants from aqueous media. More importantly, due to TPExP6’s strong fluorescence emission properties, it can also be further utilized for live-cell imaging. These findings highlight the considerable potential of emissive functionalized macrocycles as versatile and responsive platforms for advancing water purification technologies and cell imaging.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Doctoral Start-up Funds of Nantong Institute of Technology (WP202511).

Footnotes

Edited by: Yong Yao, Nantong University, China

Reviewed by: Bingbing Shi, Northwest Normal University, China

Yan Cai, Nantong University, China

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the CCDC repository, accession number 2488938.

Author contributions

TC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. FW: Validation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Methodology, Visualization, Software, Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Data curation, Funding acquisition.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2026.1799183/full#supplementary-material

DataSheet1.docx (2.1MB, docx)

References

  1. Achkar T. E., Moufawad T., Ruellan S., Landy D., Greige-Gerges H., Fourmentin S. (2020). Cyclodextrins: from solute to solvent. Chem. Commun. 56, 3385–3388. 10.1039/D0CC00460J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai Y., Zhang Y., Liang X., Deng C., Zhang J., Wang H., et al. (2025). A water-soluble cationic [2]biphenyl-extended pillar[6]arene: synthesis, host–guest interaction with hemin and application in chemodynamic/photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 61, 5333–5336. 10.1039/D5CC00627A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen T., Wang J., Tang R., Huang Y., Zhao Q., et al. (2023). An amphiphilic [2]biphenyl-extended pillar[6]arene: synthesis, controllable self-assembly in water and application in cell-imaging. Chin. Chem. Lett. 34, 108088. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J.-F., Gao Q.-X., Yao H., Shi B., Zhang Y. M., Wei T. B., et al. (2024). Recent advances in circularly polarized luminescence of planar chiral organic compounds. Chem. Commun. 60, 6728–6740. 10.1039/D4CC01698J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y., Yang M.-K., Li S.-X., Zhou S.-L., Hu C.-N., et al. (2025). Imidazole cationic-bridged Pillar[5]arene polymer as a recycle adsorbent for iodine capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 8382–8393. 10.1021/acsami.4c21105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai Y., Yu W., Cheng Y., Zhou Y., Zou J., Meng Y., et al. (2025). Recent developments in pillar[5]arene-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 61, 2484–2495. 10.1039/D4CC05660D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dishi O., Rahav Y., Gidron O. (2024). π-Conjugated oligofuran macrocycles. Chem. Commun. 60, 522–529. 10.1039/D3CC05225G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fang A., Kroenlein K., Riccardi D., Smolyanitsky A. (2019). Highly mechanosensitive ion channels from graphene-embedded crown ethers. Nat. Mater 18, 76–81. 10.1038/s41563-018-0220-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Francisco T. N., Sousa J. L. C., Guieu S., Silva A. M. S., Albuquerque H. M. T. (2022). Mild synthesis of symmetric 3,5-Disubstituted nitrobenzenes. Synlett 33, 1505–1510. 10.1055/a-1875-2646 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo S., Huang Q., Chen Y., Wei J., Zheng J., Wang L., et al. (2021). Synthesis and bioactivity of guanidinium-functionalized Pillar[5]arene as a biofilm disruptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 618–623. 10.1002/anie.202013975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Han X.-N., Han Y., Chen C.-F. (2023). Recent advances in the synthesis and applications of macrocyclic arenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 3265–3298. 10.1039/D3CS00002H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hua B., Shao L., Liang H., Huang F. (2022). Macrocycle-based solid-state supramolecular polymers. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 1025–1034. 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang B., Wang P., Ouyang Y., Pang R., Liu S., Hong C., et al. (2020). Pillar[5]arene-Based switched supramolecular photosensitizer for self-amplified and pH-Activated photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 41038–41046. 10.1021/acsami.0c10372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang X., Zang M., Li F., Hou C., Luo Q., et al. (2021). Highly sensitive detection of paraquat with pillar[5]arenes as an aptamer in an α-hemolysin nanopore. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 7032–7040. 10.1039/D1QM00875G [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kato K., Kaneda T., Ohtani S., Ogoshi T. (2023). Per-arylation of pillar[n]arenes: an effective tool to modify the properties of macrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 6905–6913. 10.1021/jacs.3c00397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalil-Cruz L. E., Liu P., Huang F., Khashab N. M. (2021). Multifunctional pillar[n]arene-based smart nanomaterials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces13 13, 31337–31354. 10.1021/acsami.1c05798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Khutorianskyi V. V., Sonawane M., Pošta M., Beier P. (2016). Oxidative nucleophilic aromatic amination of nitrobenzenes. Chem. Commun. 52, 7237–7240. 10.1039/C6CC02235A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li B., Cui L., Li C. (2020). Macrocycle Co-Crystals showing vapochromism to haloalkanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 22012–22016. 10.1002/anie.202010802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li M.-H., Lou X.-Y., Yang Y.-W. (2021). Pillararene-based molecular-scale porous materials. Chem. Commun. 57, 13429–13447. 10.1039/D1CC06105D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li W.-J., Gu Q., Wang X.-Q., Zhang D.-Y., Wang Y.-T., He X., et al. (2021). AIE-active chiral [3]rotaxanes with switchable circularly polarized luminescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 9507–9515. 10.1002/anie.202100934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li M., Liu Y., Shao L., Hua B., Wang M., Liang H., et al. (2023). Pillararene-based variable stoichiometry co-crystallization: a versatile approach to diversified solid-state superstructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 667–675. 10.1021/jacs.2c11618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu Y.-H., Zhang Y.-M., Yu H.-J., Liu Y. (2021). Cucurbituril-based biomacromolecular assemblies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 3870–3880. 10.1002/anie.202009797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu B., Yan X., Wang J., Jing D., Bei J., Cai Y., et al. (2022). Rim-differentiated pillar[5]arene based nonporous adaptive crystals. Chem. Commun. 58, 2480–2483. 10.1039/D1CC07124F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nag R., Rao C. P. (2022). Calixarene-mediated host–guest interactions leading to supramolecular assemblies: visualization by microscopy. Chem. Commun. 58, 6044–6063. 10.1039/D2CC01850K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nagarkar S. S., Joarder B., Chaudhari A. K., Mukherjee S., Ghosh S. K. (2013). Highly selective detection of nitro explosives by a luminescent metal–organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2881–2885. 10.1002/anie.201208885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pérez-Márquez L. A., Perretti M. D., García-Rodríguez R., Lahoz F., Carrillo R. (2022). A fluorescent cage for supramolecular sensing of 3-Nitrotyrosine in human blood serum. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202205403. 10.1002/anie.202205403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang R., Ye Y., Zhu S., Wang Y., Lu B., et al. (2023). Pillar[6]arenes: from preparation, host-guest property to self-assembly and applications. Chin. Chem. Lett. 34, 107734. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.08.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tang R., Zhou L., Dai Y., Wang Y., Cai Y., Chen T., et al. (2024). Polydopamine modified by pillar[5]arene in situ for targeted chemo-photothermal cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 60, 1160–1163. 10.1039/D3CC04196D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wada K., Yasuzawa K., Fa S., Nagata Y., Kato K., Ohtani S., et al. (2023). Diastereoselective rotaxane synthesis with Pillar[5]arenes via Co-crystallization and solid-state mechanochemical processes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 15324–15330. 10.1021/jacs.3c02919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang J., Wang D., Cen M., Jing D., Bei J., Huang Y., et al. (2022a). GOx-assisted synthesis of pillar[5]arene based supramolecular polymeric nanoparticles for targeted/synergistic chemo-chemodynamic cancer therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 33. 10.1186/s12951-021-01237-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang Y., Tang R., Wang D., Wang J., Huang Y., Ding Y., et al. (2022b). Platinum(II)-Metallaclip-Based theranostics for cell imaging and synergetic chemotherapy–photodynamic therapy. Inorg. Chem. 62, 1786–1790. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang Y., Wang D., Wang J., Wang C., Wang J., Ding Y., et al. (2022c). Pillar[5]arene-derived covalent organic materials with pre-encoded molecular recognition for targeted and synergistic cancer photo- and chemotherapy. Chem. Commun. 58, 1689–1692. 10.1039/D1CC07072J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang J., Cen M., Wang J., Wang D., Ding Y., et al. (2022d). Water-soluble pillar[4]arene[1]quinone: synthesis, host-guest property and application in the fluorescence turn-on sensing of ethylenediamine in aqueous solution, organic solvent and air. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33, 1475–1478. 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang Y., Tang R., Zhang Y., Dai Y., Zhou Q., et al. (2023a). Pillar[5]arene-Derived Terpyridinepalladium(II) complex: synthesis, characterization, and application in green catalysis. Inorg. Chem. 62, 7605–7610. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang Y., Zhong H., Yang J., Yao Y., Li L. (2023b). Solvents/photo/pillar[5]arene triple responsive morphology and luminescence transformation from an amphiphilic dicyanostilbene-functionalized thiophene. Chin. Chem. Lett. 34, 108452. 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108452 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu J.-R., Yang Y.-W. (2019). Geminiarene: molecular scale dual selectivity for chlorobenzene and chlorocyclohexane fractionation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12280–12287. 10.1021/jacs.9b03559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu J.-H., Zhang F. (2020). Rapid aerobic visible-light-driven photo-reduction of nitrobenzene. Sci. Total Environ. 710, 136322. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu J.-R., Mu A. U., Li B., Wang C.-Y., Fang L., Yang Y. W. (2018). Desymmetrized leaning Pillar[6]arene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 9853–9858. 10.1002/anie.201805980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu J.-R., Wu G., Yang Y.-W. (2022). Pillararene-inspired macrocycles: from extended pillar[n]arenes to geminiarenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 3191–3204. 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu G., Wu J.-R., Wang Y., Yang Y.-W. (2023). Emissive fluoren-triangles for solid-state fluorochromism and selective gas sorption. Chem. 9, 2918–2930. 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.05.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu L., Meng Y., Zheng X., Bai Y., Han C., et al. (2025). Pillar[5]arene based prodrug as a GSH-responsive SO2 nanogenerator for effective gas cancer therapy. Chin. Chem. Lett. 36, 110808. 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110808 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu K., Zhang Z.-Y., Zhou Z., Li C. (2022). Prospering the biphen[n]arenes family by tailoring reaction modules. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33, 2451–2454. 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.096 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan H., Yin X., Wang D., Han T., Tang B. Z. (2023). Synergistically boosting the circularly polarized luminescence of functionalized Pillar[5]arenes by polymerization and aggregation. Adv. Sci. 10, 2305149. 10.1002/advs.202305149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang L.-P., Jiang W. (2020). An emerging naphthol-based macrocyclic arene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 15794–15796. 10.1002/anie.202003423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang M., Yang K., Gao B., Wang P., Li T., Zheng Y., et al. (2022). A supramolecular nano-delivery system based on AIE PARP inhibitor prodrug and glycosylated pillar[5]arene for drug-resistance therapy. Chem. Commun. 58, 11147–11150. 10.1039/D2CC04238J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yu Y., Qu X., Li J., Huang F., Yang J. (2023). Arylazopyrazole as a photo-switch for controllable self-assembly of pillar[6]arene-based supramolecular amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 59, 14265–14268. 10.1039/D3CC05018A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang Y., Wang Y., Chen T., Han Y., Yan C., Wang J., et al. (2023). Pillar[5]arene based water-soluble [3]pseudorotaxane with enhanced fluorescence emission for cell imaging and both type I and II photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 59, 8266–8269. 10.1039/D3CC01929B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao L., Jian T., Shi L., Li Y., Wen Z., Guo L., et al. (2023). Case report: methemoglobinemia caused by nitrobenzene poisoning. Front. Med. 10, 1096644. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1096644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhou L., Zhou Y., Fang L., Bai Y., Meng Y., et al. (2024). Pillar[5]arene based artificial light-harvesting supramolecular polymer for efficient and recyclable photocatalytic applications. Chin. Chem. Lett. 35, 109509. 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109509 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu H., Liu J., Wu Y., Wang L., Zhang H., Li Q., et al. (2023). Substrate-responsive Pillar[5]arene-Based organic room-temperature phosphorescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 11130–11139. 10.1021/jacs.3c00711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

DataSheet1.docx (2.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the CCDC repository, accession number 2488938.


Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES