Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2024 Apr 4;45(3):455–475. doi: 10.1002/mas.21882

Protein glycosylation in lung cancer from a mass spectrometry perspective

Mirjam Balbisi 1,2, Simon Sugár 1, Lilla Turiák 1,
PMCID: PMC13062607  PMID: 38576136

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is a severe disease for which better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Increasing evidence implies that aberrant protein glycosylation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis and progression of lung cancer. Differences in glycosylation patterns have been previously observed between healthy and cancerous samples as well as between different lung cancer subtypes, which suggests untapped diagnostic potential. In addition, understanding the changes mediated by glycosylation may shed light on possible novel therapeutic targets and personalized treatment strategies for lung cancer patients. Mass spectrometry based glycomics and glycoproteomics have emerged as powerful tools for in‐depth characterization of changes in protein glycosylation, providing valuable insights into the molecular basis of lung cancer. This paper reviews the literature on the analysis of protein glycosylation in lung cancer using mass spectrometry, which is dominated by manuscripts published over the past 5 years. Studies analyzing N‐glycosylation, O‐glycosylation, and glycosaminoglycan patterns in tissue, serum, plasma, and rare biological samples of lung cancer patients are highlighted. The current knowledge on the potential utility of glycan and glycoprotein biomarkers is also discussed.

Keywords: glycosaminoglycan, lung cancer, mass spectrometry, N‐glycosylation, O‐glycosylation


Abbreviations

2‐D DIGE

two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

2‐D PAGE

two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

2‐DE

two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis

A1AG1

alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein

A1BG

alpha‐1B‐glycoprotein

AC

adenocarcinoma

ACT

alpha‐1‐antichymotrypsin

ALK

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

APCS

serum amyloid p component

Asn

asparagine

AUC

area under curve

AZGP1

zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein

BAL

bronchoalveolar lavage

BLD

benign lung disease

C18

octadecyl bonded silica

C9

complement component C9

CE

capillary electrophoresis

CFB

complement factor B

CP

ceruloplasmin

CRP

C‐reactive protein

CS

chondroitin sulfate

DS

dermatan sulfate

DSIgG

disease‐specific immunoglobulin G

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

ELISA

enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

ESI

electrospray ionization

EV

extracellular vesicle

FF

fresh‐frozen

FFPE

formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded

FTICR

Fourier‐transform ion cyclotron resonance

Fuc

fucose

FUT

fucosyltransferase

Fyn

proto‐oncogene tyrosine‐protein kinase Fyn

GAG

glycosaminoglycan

Gal

galactose

GalNAc

N‐acetylgalactosamine

GlcNAc

N‐acetylglucosamine

GPI‐80

vascular noninflammatory molecule 2

HA

hyaluronan

HILIC

hydrophilic interaction chromatography

Hp

haptoglobin

HPLC

high‐performance liquid chromatography

HPX

hemopexin

HS

heparan sulfate

IGFBP3

insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 3

IgG

immunoglobulin G

IGHG3

immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 3

ITGB3

integrin beta 3

iTRAQ

isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification

KRAS

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus

LCC

large cell carcinoma

LFQ

label‐free quantification

LIT

linear ion trap

L‐PGDS

lipocalin‐type prostaglandin D synthase

LRG1

leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein

MALDI

matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization

Man

mannose

MRM

multiple reaction monitoring

MS/MS

tandem mass spectrometry

MS

mass spectrometry

NBS

2‐nitrobenzensulfenyl

NSCLC

non‐small cell lung cancer

PAGE

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PD‐1

programmed cell death protein 1

PD‐L1

programmed cell death ligand 1

PEDF

pigment epithelial differentiation factor

PG

proteoglycan

PGC

porous graphitic carbon

PNGase F

peptide‐N‐glycosidase F

PON1

serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1

PTM

posttranslational modification

Q

quadrupole

QIT

quadrupole ion trap

qPCR

quantitative polymerase chain reaction

QqQ

triple quadrupole

ROC

receiver operator characteristic

SCLC

small cell lung cancer

SCX

strong cation exchange

SDS‐PAGE

sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Ser

serine

SERPINA4

kallistatin

sEV

small extracellular vesicle

SNA

sambucus nigra

SPE

solid phase extraction

SqCC

squamous cell carcinoma

Thr

threonine

TMT

tandem mass tag

TOF

time‐of‐flight

UA

uronic acid

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

WGA

wheat germ agglutinin

ZIC‐HILIC

zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction chromatography

1. INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer affects a large number of individuals: in 2020, there were 2.2 million newly diagnosed cases and 1.8 million deaths, which represented 11.4% of cancer diagnoses and 18.0% of cancer‐related mortality (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2023). Less than 50% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer survive more than a year after diagnosis and 80% die within 5 years (World Cancer Research Fund International, 2023).

Lung cancer can be divided into two primary types based on histology: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Travis et al., 2015). NSCLC accounts for approximately 80‐85% (Molina et al., 2008; Suster & Mino‐Kenudson, 2020) of all lung cancer cases, making it the more prevalent form. Within NSCLC, further subdivisions exist based on histology, which include adenocarcinoma (AC), squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and large cell carcinoma (LCC) (Rodriguez‐Canales et al., 2016). Oncogenic driver mutations (e.g., KRAS, EGFR, or ALK) are also used to subset NSCLC patients, defining further subgroups and contributing to the overall diversity of lung cancer types (Grodzka et al., 2023).

Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies have become an integral part of clinical practice and offer significant benefits to patients (Wang et al., 2021; Wen et al., 2012). For example, if lung cancer patients have specific gene mutations, they can receive gene inhibitor‐based targeted therapy, like gefitinib, erlotinib, osimertinib for EGFR mutations, or crizotinib, alectinib, and brigatinib for ALK rearrangements (Cooper et al., 2022). A number of immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs are also approved, many of which inhibit the PD‐L1/PD‐1 interaction. Despite an initial positive response, however, patients often develop resistance to these treatments over time, accounting for a large part of cancer‐related deaths (Boumahdi & de Sauvage, 2020; Wang et al., 2019). Due to the prevalence and lethality of the disease, extensive research efforts should be directed towards a better understanding of the biology of lung cancer to improve its diagnosis and treatment.

Proteins may undergo various posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, hydroxylation, and ubiquitination (Karve & Cheema, 2011). These PTMs play a key role in the regulation of the cellular environment and may therefore affect cancer pathophysiology. Glycosylation is the enzymatic addition of carbohydrate moieties (glycans) to the protein backbone, which is a highly regulated process that occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus of eukaryotic cells (Lin et al., 2020; Stanley, 2011). According to several studies, glycosylation has a complex impact on the entire spectrum of cancer pathology (Lin & Lubman, 2024; Munkley & Elliott, 2016; Peixoto et al., 2019; Rodrigues et al., 2018). In the initiation phase, aberrant glycosylation primarily affects key proteins involved in cell growth regulation (e.g., EGFR) and contributes to uncontrolled cell growth. Altered glycosylation of adhesion molecules (e.g., integrins, cadherins) affect cell adhesion and promote invasion into surrounding tissues. Glycosylation modifications on angiogenic factors, including VEGF, play a role in angiogenesis and subsequently the nutrient supply to growing tumors. In addition, cancer cells manipulate the glycosylation of immune checkpoint proteins to avoid recognition by the immune system. During metastasis, glycosylation changes in proteins associated with cell adhesion, motility, and extracellular matrix interactions contribute to the increased migratory and invasive capabilities of cancer cells, promoting the development of secondary tumors in distant organs.

The two main types of protein glycosylation are N‐glycosylation and O‐glycosylation. N‐linked glycans (N‐glycans) are predominantly covalently attached to proteins at asparagine (Asn) residues within the consensus sequence Asn‐X‐Ser/Thr (where X can be any amino acid except proline) (Stanley et al., 2022). All eukaryotic N‐glycans have a common core structure of 3 mannose (Man) and 2 N‐acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) units (Man3GlcNAc2Asn), and can be divided into oligomannose, complex and hybrid types. N‐glycosylation affects cellular processes, including protein folding, intracellular trafficking, and cell‐cell interactions (Sim et al., 2022).

O‐glycosylation involves the attachment of glycans to the hydroxyl oxygen atom of serine (Ser) or threonine (Thr) residues (Brockhausen et al., 2022). The most frequent O‐glycans are mucin‐type O‐glycans, which start with an O‐linked N‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) unit. Unlike N‐glycans, O‐glycans do not have a well‐defined core structure; the GalNAc can be extended through four different core structures to a mature linear or branched O‐glycan. O‐glycosylation plays a role in protein stability, protein folding, cell adhesion, signal transduction, and immune response (Chia et al., 2016).

In addition to the two mentioned above, there is another class of glycoconjugates called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAGs are linear polysaccharides consisting of repeating disaccharide units and are most commonly linked to proteoglycan (PG) core proteins to form proteoglycans (Pomin & Mulloy, 2018). Four classes of GAGs can be distinguished based on the disaccharide structure, of which heparan sulfate (HS, uronic acid‐N‐acetylglucosamine, UA‐GlcNAc units) and chondroitin/dermatan sulfate (CS/DS, uronic acid‐N‐acetylgalactosamine, UA‐GalNAc units) are the most widely studied (Lawrence et al., 2008; Yamada et al., 2011). During their biosynthesis, GAGs can be sulfated at multiple positions within each saccharide unit and undergo uronic acid epimerization, contributing to structural diversity. Proteoglycans are primarily found in the extracellular matrix and on the cell surface and play critical roles in cell signaling, tissue organization, and inflammation, except for serglycin, which is an intracellular proteoglycan primarily located in the granules of immune cells, and carries heparin in addition to CS (Mulloy et al., 2017).

The study of protein glycosylation can be approached from three different perspectives: (i) glycomics focuses only on the structural characterization of glycans, (ii) glycoproteomics focuses on both the structure of glycans and their localization on the protein backbone, and (iii) intact glycoproteins can also be examined revealing different proteoforms (Yang, Franc, et al., 2017). For all strategies, mass spectrometry (MS) is one of the most efficient analytical tools.

Glycomic strategies utilize enzymatic or chemical methods to release glycans (Yang, Franc, et al., 2017). Subsequently, they are typically analyzed using high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE) tandem MS (MS/MS) with electrospray ionization (ESI) or with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight (MALDI‐TOF) MS (Lageveen‐Kammeijer et al., 2019; Zaia, 2010). The study of released glycan molecules has historically been challenging due to the complexity caused by the high number of structural isomers and the wide range of charges. State‐of‐the‐art MS and sample preparation techniques (e.g., derivatization, selective enzymatic digestion), however, allow rapid and efficient identification and quantification of glycans from minimal amounts of biological samples (Lageveen‐Kammeijer et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2021).

In the glycoproteomic approach, proteins are first digested into peptides using a protease such as trypsin. Then, the peptide mixture is selectively enriched for glycopeptides, and subjected to HPLC‐ESI‐MS/MS analysis. The major advantage of glycoproteomics over glycomics is the ability to obtain site‐specific information. However, this technique requires more sensitive instrumentation and careful optimization of tandem mass spectrometry parameters (Bagdonaite et al., 2022). Furthermore, software tools are more scarce, although several are constantly under development (Kawahara et al., 2021; Li et al., 2013; Tsai & Chen, 2017). This technique works well for the characterization of individual glycoproteins, but is not straightforward in the case of samples containing multiple glycoproteins (Yang, Franc, et al., 2017).

A third viable approach is the analysis of intact glycoproteins by MS, but its application to complex biological samples is limited by the large structural microheterogeneity of glycoproteins and the lack of appropriate separation methods (Reid et al., 2023).

GAG analysis typically involves the use of bacterial lyase enzymes, to produce oligo‐ or disaccharides, followed by CE or HPLC separation, and subsequent analysis by ESI‐MS in negative mode (Kubaski et al., 2017; Pepi et al., 2021). GAG disaccharides, however, are a chemically labile family of compounds covering a broad range of polarities, therefore their HPLC‐MS analysis presents a number of challenges.

In this manuscript, we aimed to collect and review the current literature on the topic of protein glycosylation in human lung cancer based on mass spectrometry studies, complementing the previously reviewed proteomic (Gasparri et al., 2020; Ling et al., 2022) and proteogenomic (Nishimura et al., 2019) studies.

To review mass spectrometry studies on protein glycosylation in lung cancer, a literature search was performed in PubMed for the term lung cancer and at least one of the following terms: glycosylation, glycan, glycopeptide, glycoprotein, glycosaminoglycan, glycomics, glycoproteomics in the title or abstract, and mass spectrometry in the text. Papers that did not fit in the scope of the review (e.g., deal with nonhuman samples or do not use mass spectrometry) were manually excluded. Early studies date back to the first decade of the 2000s, but technological advances in the meantime have made it possible to obtain more reliable information over recent years. Therefore, only papers published in 2019 or after are discussed in detail, while most important information and results of all studies are summarized in Table 1. An illustration of the biological samples and protein glycosylation types examined in the studies is shown in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Review of all existing studies on human lung cancer samples analyzed using mass spectrometry.

Article Sample type Lung cancer type Sample size for MS Analyte Tested protein in case of targeted study Enzyme Enrichment Purification Special sample preparation step Type of MS instrument Data analysis Additional/verification techniques Results
Glycomic, glycoproteomic, and proteomic profiling of Philippine lung cancer and peritumoral tissues: case series study of patients stages I‐III. (Alvarez et al., 2023) FF tissue AC 5 matched pairs N‐glycans PNGase F PGC Q‐TOF MassHunter A general increase was observed in the relative abundance of high‐mannose, fucosylated and sialofucosylated N‐glycans in tumor samples.
N‐glycopeptides Trypsin HILIC Orbitrap Byonic, Byologic Glycoproteins involved in key cellular processes, such as metabolism, cell adhesion, and regulatory pathways were differentially expressed.
Sialic acid linkage‐specific quantitative N‐glycoproteomics using selective alkylamidation and multiplex TMT‐labeling (Yang & Tian, 2022) FF tissue 5 matched pairs N‐glycopeptides Trypsin ZIC‐HILIC TMT labeling, linkage‐specific sialic acid derivatization Q‐Orbitrap GPSeeker, GPSeekerQuan 521 differentially expressed intact N‐glycopeptides from 254 intact N‐glycoproteins were quantified. N‐glycoproteins sialylated at different positions are involved in different biological processes.
High‐dimensionality reduction clustering of complex carbohydrates to study lung cancer metabolic heterogeneity (Conroy et al., 2022) FFPE tissue AC 2 N‐glycans PNGase F Q‐TOF Supervised learning based high‐dimensionality reduction clustering Accurate clustering of distinct regions was observed. N‐glycans enriched in tumors with immune infiltration, fibrotic and necrotic regions were identified.
A new strategy for high‐efficient tandem enrichment and simultaneous profiling of N‐glycopeptides and phosphopeptides in lung cancer tissue (Du et al., 2022) Tissue 1 pair, 3‐3 replicates N‐glycopeptides Trypsin ZIC‐HILIC Q‐Orbitrap Byonic 1151 differentially expressed N‐glycopeptides and 249 differentially expressed N‐glycoproteins were identified.
Applicability of phenylhydrazine labeling for structural studies of fucosylated N‐glycans (Lattová et al., 2019) Cells and tissue n.i N‐glycans PNGase F, neuraminidase Nonporous graphitized carbon Phenylhydrazine labeling MALDI‐TOF/TOF Manual data evaluation Applicability of the method was demonstrated on lung cancer samples.
Modulation of CD147‐induced matrix metalloproteinase activity: role of CD147 N‐glycosylation (Huang et al., 2013) FF tissue SqCC 1 N‐glycans CD147 PNGase F SDS‐PAGE CD147 purification by immunoaffinity chromatography, permethylation of N‐glycans LIT‐Orbitrap Manual data evaluation Cell biological experiments The presence of high‐mannose and complex‐type N‐glycan structures in native CD147 were detected.
Glycoproteomic analysis of human lung adenocarcinomas using glycoarrays and tandem mass spectrometry: differential expression and glycosylation patterns of vimentin and fetuin A isoforms (Rho et al., 2009) FF tissue AC 16 matched pairs N‐glycopeptides Trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin 2‐D PAGE LIT SEQUEST Glycoarray analysis on fetuin A and vimentin 8 up‐ and 7 downregulated proteins were identified.
Analysis of the human cancer glycome identifies a novel group of tumor‐associated N‐acetylglucosamine glycan antigens (Satomaa et al., 2009) FFPE tissue SCLC, AC 7 matched pairs N‐glycans No (chemical digestion) Series of precipitation‐extraction and SPE steps MALDI‐TOF Manual data evaluation 5 lung cancer‐associated glycans were identified with abnormal nonreducing terminal GlcNAc residues. High‐mannose type N‐glycans were uniformly expressed.
Diagnostic potential of serum glycome analysis in lung cancer: a glycopattern study (Hu et al., 2024) Blood serum AC 16 cases at each stage (I‐IV), 16 controls N‐glycans PNGase F Immobilization of glycoproteins, linkage‐specific sialic acid derivatization MALDI‐TOF/TOF GlycoWorkbench 7, mostly high‐mannose glycans were upregulated in AC, while 9 complex type glycans were downregulated. A score based on their intensities can predict the stages of cancer progression.
Intra‐individual variation in disease‐specific IgG Fc glycoform ratios to monitor the disease progression of lung cancer (Zhou et al., 2023) Blood serum 1262 samples from 125 patients N‐glycopeptides DSIgG Trypsin Graphitic carbon nitride DSIgG isolation by PAGE MALDI‐FTICR manual data evaluation Measuring the ratio of 15 glycoforms might be an efficient way to monitor lung cancer progression.
Differentiation of sialyl linkages using a combination of alkyl esterification and phenylhydrazine derivatization: application for N‐glycan profiling in the sera of patients with lung cancer (Jezková et al., 2022) Blood serum 39 cases, 12 controls N‐glycans PNGase F HILIC Esterification followed by phenylhydrazine derivatization MALDI‐TOF/TOF FlexAnalysis Significant increases were observed in the amount of several tri‐ and tetraantennary glycans with mixed types of sialic acid linkages.
N‐glycan and glycopeptide serum biomarkers in Philippine lung cancer patients identified using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (Alvarez et al., 2022) Blood serum AC 26 cases, 22 controls N‐glycans PNGase F PGC Q‐TOF MassHunter Several highly branched sialylated and sialofucosylated N‐glycans were upregulated, while mono‐ and biantennary structures were downregulated in lung cancer.
N‐glycopeptides Trypsin QqQ MassHunter Differentially expressed glycoproteins were mostly involved in complement and coagulation cascades, acute inflammatory response and defense response.
Disease‐specific IgG Fc glycosylation ratios as personalized biomarkers to differentiate non‐small cell lung cancer from benign lung diseases (Zhang et al., 2020) Blood serum NSCLC 477 cases, 509 controls N‐glycopeptides DSIgG Trypsin Poplar catkin enrichment DSIgG isolation by PAGE MALDI‐FTICR Manual data evaluation Higher fucosylation of DSIgG1 and DSIgG2 and lower galactosylation of DSIgG1 were observed in NSCLC compared to benign lung diseases.
Providing bionic glycome as internal standards by glycan reducing and isotope labeling for reliable and simple quantitation of N‐glycome based on MALDI‐ MS (Qin et al., 2019) Blood serum 16 cases, 16 controls N‐glycans PNGase F HILIC Sialic acid derivatization, bionic glycome internal standard MALDI‐QIT‐TOF Manual data evaluation 34 N‐glycans were upregulated in lung cancer. 9 glycans had significant discriminatory power (AUC>0.8).
Identification a novel clinical biomarker in early diagnosis of human non‐small cell lung cancer (Jin et al., 2019) Blood serum NSCLC 6 cases, 6 controls (benign), 6 controls (healthy) Deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F Lectin enrichment C18 Dimethyl labeling Q‐TOF ProteinPilot PON1—Western blot, lectin‐ELISA 55 differentially expressed glycoproteins were identified.
Development of a parallel microbore hollow fiber enzyme reactor platform for online (18)O‐labeling: application to lectin‐specific lung cancer N‐glycoproteome. (Lee et al., 2018) Blood serum 3 cases, 1 pooled control Peptides derived from deglycosylated N‐glycoproteins PNGase F, trypsin Lectin enrichment 18O‐labeling Q‐Orbitrap n.i 76 peptides were quantified, of which 19 were at least 2.5‐fold up‐ or downregulated.
Microwave‐assisted deglycosylation for rapid and sensitive analysis of N‐glycans via glycosylamine derivatization (Wu et al., 2017) Blood serum 16 cases, 16 controls N‐glycans PNGase F HILIC Glycosylamine derivatization MALDI‐TOF/TOF Data explorer 54 labeled glycans were detected from 50 nL of serum. Significant differences were observed in 6 glycan structures, predominantly characterized by sialylation and/or core‐fucosylation, and the two groups were completely separated based on principal component analysis.
Serum glycans as risk markers for non‐small cell lung cancer (Ruhaak et al., 2016) Blood serum NSCLC Discovery set: 100 cases, test set: 108 cases + 2 controls for each case N‐glycans PNGase F PGC TOF MassHunter 12 glycan variables showed significant discriminatory power (AUC>0.6), 4 were confirmed in the validation set.
Identification of GlcNAcylated alpha‐1‐antichymotrypsin as an early biomarker in human non‐small‐cell lung cancer by quantitative proteomic analysis with two lectins (Jin et al., 2016) Blood serum NSCLC 13 cases, 6 controls (benign), 6 controls (healthy) peptides derived from N‐glycoproteins Trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin C18 iTRAQ labeling Q‐TOF ProteinPilot ACT, A1AG1, CFB, HPX—Western blot 53 differentially expressed proteins were identified.
Integrated glycoproteomics demonstrates fucosylated serum paraoxonase 1 alterations in small cell lung cancer (Ahn et al., 2014). Blood serum SCLC 5 limited disease stage, 5 extensive stage, 5 control pools peptides derived from N‐glycoproteins trypsin Fucosylated glycoproteins enriched by lectin SDS‐PAGE, LFQ vs. iTRAQ labeling LIT SEQUEST, Scaffold APCS, C9, SERPINA4, PON1—lectin ELISA, Western blot 186 proteins were identified, of which 66 were up‐ or downregulated in SCLC.
N‐glycans PNGase F PGC Permethylation of N‐glycans MALDI‐TOF FlexAnalysis Increased levels of core fucosylated bi‐ and triantennary glycans were observed even in the limited disease stage.
Change in IgG1 Fc N‐linked glycosylation in human lung cancer: age‐ and sex‐related diagnostic potential (Chen et al., 2013) Blood serum Discovery set: 30 cases, 30 controls, test set: 229 cases, 380 controls N‐glycopeptides IgG trypsin C18 IgG separation by SDS‐PAGE MALDI‐FTICR Manual data evaluation A decrease in IgG1 Fc‐galactosylation was observed in lung cancer patients, but the diagnostic ability of IgG1 Fc‐glycosylation was found to be gender‐ and age‐dependent.
Dual lectin‐based size sorting strategy to enrich targeted N‐glycopeptides by asymmetrical flow field‐flow fractionation: profiling lung cancer biomarkers (Kim et al., 2012) blood serum 3 cases, 3 controls Deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides trypsin, PNGase F Lectin complexation followed by asymmetrical flow field‐flow fractionation LIT Proteome Discoverer 16 up‐ and 24 downregulated N‐glycopeptides (with fold changes of at least 10) were identified in WGA enriched lung cancer serum, and 18 up‐ and 3 downregulated glycopeptides in case of SNA enrichment.
Glycoproteomics analysis to identify a glycoform on haptoglobin associated with lung cancer (Tsai et al., 2011) Blood serum AC, SqCC, SCLC, unknown type 45 cases, 26 controls N‐glycans haptoglobin PNGase F Extraction with chloroform Haptoglobin separation by 2‐DE gel, permethylation of N‐glycans MALDI‐TOF/TOF, LIT‐Orbitrap MassLynx Fucosylation level of Hp significantly increased in each subtype of lung cancer. Hp in the sera of patients with AC and SqCC displayed a higher degree of fucosylation than in the sera of patients with SCLC or unknown type of lung cancer.
Lung cancer serum biomarker discovery using glycoprotein capture and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (Zeng et al., 2010) Blood serum NSCLC 9 AC, 6 SqCC, 8 control (lung disease), 8 control (healthy) pools Deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F Glycoproteins enriched by hydrazide C18 LIT‐Orbitrap SEQUEST ACT, IGFBP3, L‐PGDS—ELISA  38 glycopeptides from 22 proteins were differentially expressed between at least 2 sample group, including glycoproteins involved in cell signaling and interaction, molecular transport, and cell morphology.
Glycoproteomic analysis of WGA‐bound glycoprotein biomarkers in sera from patients with lung adenocarcinoma (Hongsachart et al., 2009) Blood serum AC 10 cases, 10 controls Peptides derived from N‐glycoproteins Trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin C18 Co‐immunoprecipitation, 2‐DE/2‐D DIGE MALDI‐Q‐TOF MASCOT, Protein Prospector Adiponectin, ceruloplasmin, cyclin H, Fyn and GPI‐80—Western blot 27 up‐ and 12 downregulated proteins were identified.
Identification of putative serum glycoprotein biomarkers for human lung adenocarcinoma by multilectin affinity chromatography and LC‐MS/MS (Heo et al., 2007) Blood serum AC 3 cases, 3 controls Peptides derived from deglycosylated N‐glycoproteins PNGase F, trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin SDS‐PAGE LIT Bioworks, ProtAn Plasma kallikrein, inter‐α‐trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 3—Western blot 38 upregulated and 12 downregulated glycoproteins were identified in cancer. The majority of the upregulated proteins were associated with transport, immune responses, and inflammatory processes.
Comparative profiling of serum glycoproteome by sequential purification of glycoproteins and 2‐nitrobenzensulfenyl (NBS) stable isotope labeling: a new approach for the novel biomarker discovery for cancer (Ueda et al., 2007) Blood serum AC 5 cases, 5 controls Peptides derived from N‐glycoproteins Trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin NBS labeling MALDI‐QIT‐TOF Mascot 34 differentially abundant serum glycoproteins were identified.
N‐glycans haptoglobin, PEDF PNGase F Diol‐modified monolithic silica Immunoprecipitation, SDS‐PAGE MALDI‐QIT‐TOF Kompact Lectin blot Glycan structural changes in cancer were confirmed for haptoglobin and PEDF.
Glycoproteomics revealed novel N‐glycosylation biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma cancers (Fang et al., 2022) Blood plasma AC 20 cases, 20 controls Deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F HILIC C18 TMT labeling Q‐Orbitrap Maxquant, Proteome Discoverer 17 N‐glycosylation sites were upregulated and 22 were downregulated in cancer. ITGB3‐680 had the highest potential for early diagnosis.
Differential proteomic approach for identification and verification of aberrantly glycosylated proteins in adenocarcinoma lung cancer (ADLC) plasmas by lectin‐capturing and targeted mass spectrometry (Ahn et al., 2014) Blood plasma AC 30 cases, 30 controls N‐glycopeptides A1AG1, CP Trypsin Glycoproteins enriched by lectin n.i QqQ Manual data evaluation ELISA Both A1AG1 and CP were promising biomarker candidates, with AUC of 0.758 and 0.847, respectively.
Enrichment strategies in glycomics‐based lung cancer biomarker development (Ruhaak et al., 2013) Blood plasma AC 20 cases, 20 controls N‐glycans Untargeted + IgG PNGase F PGC IgG capturing by affinity purification TOF MassHunter Statistically significant differences were observed in case of four glycans, while four further glycans showed significant differences in the IgG fraction.
Ultrasensitive characterization of site‐specific glycosylation of affinity‐purified haptoglobin from lung cancer patient plasma using 10 μm i.d. porous layer open tubular liquid chromatography‐linear ion trap collision‐induced dissociation/electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry (Wang et al., 2011) Blood plasma NSCLC 1 pool measured in 10 MS runs N‐glycopeptides, deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Haptoglobin Trypsin vs. trypsin, PNGase F Immunoaffinity purification LIT SEQUEST The method allowed the identification of 26 glycoforms from 10 HPLC‐MS runs using 100 fmol protein digest.
Aberrant fucosylation of saliva glycoprotein defining lung adenocarcinomas malignancy (Gao et al., 2022) Saliva AC 20 cases, 21 controls (other diseases), 10 controls (healthy) N‐glycans PNGase F, specific fucosidases Linkage‐specific sialic acid derivatization MALDI‐TOF/TOF FlexAnalysis The intensity of α1,2 and α1,3‐core fucosylated N‐glycans was significantly higher in cancer than in controls.
deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F Hydrazide Orbitrap n.i Fucosyltransferases—qPCR FUT6 and FUT11 fucosyltransferases were identified in saliva.
N‐glycan structures of target cancer biomarker characterized by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry (Liu et al., 2020) Saliva NSCLC 10 cases, 20 controls deglycosylated peptides derived from N‐glycoproteins trypsin, PNGase F Glycoproteins enriched by lectin Q‐Orbitrap Proteome Discoverer Over 300 N‐glycoproteins were identified, including AZGP1.
N‐glycopeptides AZGP1 Trypsin HILIC 2‐DE Q‐Orbitrap pGlyco Western blot 5 lung cancer‐specific glycan structures have been identified.
Glycoproteomic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid identifies tumor‐associated glycoproteins from lung adenocarcinoma (Li et al., 2013) FFPE tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage AC 8 BAL fluid (4 cases, 4 controls), 16 tissue (8 cases, 8 controls) deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F Hydrazide SCX LFQ vs. iTRAQ labeling Orbitrap SEQUEST, Proteome Discoverer Napsin A—ELISA 80 glycoproteins were identified, of which 25 glycoproteins showed greater than 2‐fold difference between cancerous and benign BAL.
N‐glycoprotein profiling of lung adenocarcinoma pleural effusions by shotgun proteomics (Soltermann et al., 2008) Pleural effusion AC 5 cases, 5 controls deglycosylated N‐glycopeptides Trypsin, PNGase F Glycoproteins enriched by hydrazide LIT COMET, SEQUEST, Protein‐Prophet Several glycoproteins previously associated with tumor progression were identified in the pleural effusion.
Compositional Analysis of glycosaminoglycans in different lung cancer types—a pilot study (Pál et al., 2023) FFPE tissue AC, SCLC, SqCC, LCC 77 CS (41 cases, 36 controls), 76 HS (40 cases, 36 controls) CS, HS Chondroitinase ABC, heparinase I‐II‐III HILIC, graphite Q‐TOF MassLynx Total CS amount was significantly higher in tumor tissue than in adjacent normal tissue. CS 6‐O‐/4‐O‐sulfation differed between the lung cancer types.
Inter‐ and intratumoral proteomics and glycosaminoglycan characterization of ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma tissues: a pilot study (Balbisi et al., 2023) FFPE tissue AC 18 cases, 4 controls CS, HS Chondroitinase ABC, heparinase I‐II‐III HILIC, graphite Q‐TOF MassLynx Increases in both total GAG amount and average sulfation were observed in tumors. GAG‐omics profile was highly dependent on the mucin content of the region.
Glycosaminoglycans and glycolipids as potential biomarkers in lung cancer (Li et al., 2017) FF tissue SqCC 10 matched pairs CS, HS, HA Chondroitinase ABC‐ACII, heparinase I‐II‐III HS disaccharides labeled by AMAC QIT n.i Tumor samples contained more than twice as much CS as the normal ones, while no significant change was observed for the other two GAG types. The level of the 6‐sulfated CS disaccharide increased, while the level of the 4‐sulfated disaccharide decreased in cancer.
Serum proteomic profiling reveals differentially expressed IGHG3 and A1AG1 as potential predictors of chemotherapeutic response in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (Mon et al., 2021) Blood serum NSCLC 14 cases (8 responders, 6 non‐responders) peptides Trypsin C18 ion trap MASCOT IGHG3, A1AG1—Western blot 52 proteins were differentially expressed, e.g. IGHG3 was elevated, while A1AG1 was reduced in responders as compared to non‐responders.
Discovery and validation of predictive biomarkers of survival for non‐small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy: two proteins with predictive value (Walker et al., 2015) Blood plasma SqCC 3‐3 samples from 6 cases (3: <14 month survival, 3: >18 month survival) peptides Trypsin C18 iTRAQ labeling Q‐TOF ProteinPilot CRP, LRG1—ELISA 658 proteins were quantified. The two groups were separated in PCA. Differentially abundant proteins included CRP and LRG1.
Glycosylated alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein 1 as a potential lung cancer serum biomarker (Ayyub et al., 2016) Blood serum NSCLC, SCLC 100 cases, 50 controls peptides Trypsin 2‐DE MALDI‐TOF/TOF MASCOT, NetNGlyc A1AG1—ELISA 8 differentially expressed proteins were identified, of which A1AG1 was validated.
Integrative proteomics and tissue microarray profiling indicate the association between overexpressed serum proteins and non‐small cell lung cancer (Liu et al., 2012) Blood serum NSCLC 13 cases, 5 controls peptides Trypsin LIT Bioworks, SEQUEST A1BG, LRG1—Western blot, MRM 101 differentially expressed proteins were identified. NSCLC cases were separated from normal controls in PCA.
70 cases, 30 controls peptides A1BG, LRG1 Trypsin Internal standard peptides QqQ MassHunter A1BG and LRG1 were overexpressed in NSCLC and showed AUCs of 0.816 and 0.880, respectively.
Proteomic identification of exosomal LRG1: a potential urinary biomarker for detecting NSCLC (Li et al., 2011) Urinary exosomes NSCLC 8 cases, 1 control pool peptides Trypsin SDS‐PAGE QIT Spectrum Mill Electronmicroscopy, LRG1——Western blot 18 proteins were identified. LRG1 was more abundant in NSCLC than in controls.
2‐D difference gel electrophoresis of the lung squamous cell carcinoma versus normal sera demonstrates consistent alterations in the levels of ten specific proteins (Dowling et al., 2007) Blood serum SqCC 8 cases, 8 controls proteins, peptides Trypsin C18 2‐D DIGE MALDI‐TOF, LIT PMF Pro‐Found Haptoglobin—Western blot Several glycoproteins were differentially abundant in SqCC, including apolipoprotein A‐IV precursor, complement component C3, haptoglobin and alpha‐2‐HS glycoprotein.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Overview of the investigated biological sample types from lung cancer patients and the potential protein glycosylation types. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

2. N‐GLYCOSYLATION IN LUNG CANCER

Several techniques are available for sample preparation before the mass spectrometry analysis of glycosylated proteins, which are reviewed elsewhere (Illiano et al., 2020; Lageveen‐Kammeijer et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2018). Therefore, the analytical information regarding the studies such as sample size, analyte, enzyme type, enrichment and purification mechanisms, type of mass spectrometer used and data analysis parameters are reported in Table 1 and not discussed in detail. Figure 2 provides a schematic summary of the analytical steps used in different N‐glycomics workflows.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

General steps of the different N‐glycomics workflows. The species being investigated are shown in green, the sample preparation steps in yellow and the measurement methods in blue. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

2.1. Tissue

Mass spectrometry is suitable for the analysis of both fresh‐frozen (FF) (Yang & Tian, 2022) and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) (Satomaa et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2018) tissues. In the case of FFPE tissues, following deparaffinization antigen retrieval is performed to eliminate formalin‐induced crosslinks (Addis et al., 2009; O'Rourke & Padula, 2016). Tissue analysis using HPLC‐MS can be conducted in two different ways: either through tissue homogenization followed by in‐solution digestion (Alvarez et al., 2023; Du et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2013), or by performing on‐surface digestion. In the latter case, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging techniques on tissue sections can also be used (Conroy et al., 2022). Due to tumor heterogeneity, mass spectrometry imaging experiments offer additional insight for released glycans compared to pooled mass spectrometry workflows (Conroy et al., 2022). However, the MS imaging of glycopeptides is not yet feasible due to the lack of a sufficiently sensitive technique or a spatially resolved enrichment method.

In a recent study by Alvarez et al., a comprehensive investigation involving glycomic, glycoproteomic, and proteomic analyses was conducted on tissue samples of adenocarcinoma (AC) patients (Alvarez et al., 2023). A notable increase was observed in the relative abundance of high‐mannose, fucosylated and sialofucosylated N‐glycans within the tumor samples. Differentially expressed glycoproteins indicated the dysregulation of essential cellular processes, such as metabolism, cell adhesion, and regulatory pathways, while in case of proteins, one of the dysregulated processes was N‐linked glycosylation, further highlighting the relevance of the study of protein glycosylation in lung cancer research.

Similar results have been observed by others in glycoproteomic studies of lung tissue. Using a strategy for tandem enrichment of N‐glycopeptides and phosphopeptides, Du et al. identified 1151 differentially abundant N‐glycopeptides and 249 dysregulated N‐glycoproteins (Du et al., 2022). Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed that cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization and neutrophil degranulation were the top enriched biological processes. Yang et al. investigated the functional roles of glycoproteins associated with the 303 sialylated N‐glycopeptides quantified using an in‐house developed linkage‐specific derivatization method (Yang & Tian, 2022). N‐glycoproteins with α2,6‐sialylation were found to be mainly involved in epithelial cell differentiation, cell morphogenesis, immune response and myeloid cell apoptotic process, while N‐glycoproteins with α2,3‐sialylation were primarily associated with cell junction organization and cell adhesion.

Conroy et al. presented MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of N‐glycans from AC tumor tissue (Conroy et al., 2022). Using dimensionality reduction and clustering analysis, an accurate clustering of distinct histopathological regions was observed and specific N‐glycans were found to be enriched in tumors with immune infiltration, fibrotic and necrotic regions. For example, the core‐fucosylated Man3Gal2GlcNAc4Fuc N‐glycan was more abundant in the fibrotic regions, while tumor infiltration resulted in increased levels of Man9GlcNAc2.

2.2. Blood serum

Blood serum is the medium of the blood without blood cells and clotting factors. Its analysis presents many challenges due to the large dynamic range and complexity of its components (Pietrowska et al., 2019). Albumin is the most abundant protein in blood serum, followed by globulins. Since disease specific biomarkers are typically low abundance proteins, removal of the most abundant proteins by depletion is essential (Ueda et al., 2007; Zeng et al., 2010).

The N ‐glycan profile of blood serum from patients with lung cancer and the use of N‐glycans as potential biomarkers have been studied in detail in the past. Recently, Jezková et al. compared the N‐glycan profiles of 39 male lung cancer patients and 12 cancer‐free men using an alkyl esterification‐phenylhydrazine labeling method, which was able to discriminate 2,6‐ and 2,3‐sialic acid linkages (Jezková et al., 2022). Significant increases were observed in the levels of several tri‐ and tetraantennary glycans with mixed types of sialic acid linkages, in partial agreement with previous observations. Alvarez et al. compared the serum N‐glycan profiles of AC and healthy patients (Alvarez et al., 2022). The differentially abundant N‐glycans were found to be predominantly fucosylated, sialylated, or sialofucosylated. Several highly branched sialylated and sialofucosylated structures were overexpressed in cancer serum, while mono‐ and biantennary structures showed a significant decrease. Recently, Hu et al. compared the N‐glycan profiles of healthy individuals and AC patients at stage I–IV, and observed the upregulation of 7, mostly high‐mannose glycans in AC, while 9 complex type N‐glycans were downregulated (Hu et al., 2024). By combining information of these glycans, a score was generated which might be able to predict the AC stage, with area under curve >0.7 for most stage comparisons.

The studies mentioned above suggest that monitoring molecular changes at the glycan level may have diagnostic value and thus their applicability has been investigated. Using a Bionic glycome internal standard produced by reducing and deuterium isotope labeling of N‐glycans from pooled samples and the sialic acid derivatization method developed by Reiding et al. (Reiding et al., 2014), Qin et al. performed the absolute quantification of serum samples from 16 lung cancer patients and 16 healthy patients to detect glycan markers (Qin et al., 2019). In lung cancer serum, 34 N‐glycans were found to be upregulated. The amounts of non‐galactosylated glycans with fucose, high‐mannose glycans, and highly sialylated glycans significantly increased in lung cancer serum. Based on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) calculations, nine glycan variables, including eight glycans with α2,6‐linked sialylation, had significant discriminatory power (area under curve > 0.8) to distinguish cancer patients from controls.

A great deal of effort is directed towards exploring glycosylation changes not only at the glycan, but also at the glycoprotein level in lung cancer serum. Alvarez et al. aimed to identify potential N‐glycoprotein biomarkers from the sera of AC patients and healthy individuals (Alvarez et al., 2022). Glycopeptides corresponding to serotransferrin, alpha‐1‐antitrypsin, complement C3, and immunoglobulin M exhibited overexpression, while others corresponding to haptoglobin, complement component C8 beta chain, ceruloplasmin, alpha‐1‐antichymotrpysin, and immunoglobulin G2 showed underexpression. These glycoproteins were mostly involved in biological processes such as complement and coagulation cascades, acute inflammatory response and defense response.

Jin et al. identified a total of 55 differentially expressed glycoproteins from NSCLC serum samples, and among these, serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 (PON1) protein was validated by Western blot and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Jin et al., 2019). Combining PON1 with the previously identified glycoprotein alpha‐1‐antichymotrypsin (Jin et al., 2016) as a potential biomarker, a sensitivity and specificity of over 90% was observed. PON1 has also been proposed as a biomarker in SCLC, as Ahn et al. found an increased fucosylation of PON1 in the serum of SCLC patients (Ahn et al., 2014).

In addition to studying the glycosylation of the overall protein set, the study of glycosylation of individual proteins can also provide useful information and may be of diagnostic or therapeutic interest. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is one of the most abundant serum proteins, containing a single glycosylation site at Asn‐297 of both heavy chains in the Fc region. The functions of IgG rely on the interaction of the Fc region with other proteins, thus Fc glycosylation has a major impact on the bioactivity of IgG (Arnold et al., 2007). To eliminate interindividual variability, Zhou et al. monitored changes during lung cancer progression (Zhou et al., 2023). Disease‐specific IgG (DSIgG) was analyzed by isolating serum immunoinflammation‐related protein complexes and it was found that measuring the ratio of 15 glycoforms might be an efficient way to monitor disease progression. In addition, Zhang et al. tested DSIgG from 509 patients with benign lung diseases (BLD) and 477 with NSCLC, and observed higher fucosylation of both DSIgG1 and DSIgG2 and lower galactosylation of DSIgG1 in NSCLC compared to BLD (Zhang et al., 2020).

2.3. Other sources

Blood plasma is less frequently used in cancer research compared to serum, but its analysis poses similar challenges. Recently, Fang et al. investigated the plasma of 20 stage I AC patients and 20 healthy controls at the glycopeptide level (Fang et al., 2022). A total of 39 N‐glycosylation sites were differentially occupied in AC, of which 17 and 22 were up‐ and downregulated. A site of integrin beta 3 protein (ITGB3‐680) was downregulated in AC and showed the highest potential for early diagnosis.

Although the most commonly tested biological samples are tissue and blood, saliva (Gao et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2020), pleural effusion (Soltermann et al., 2008) and bronchoalveolar lavage (Li et al., 2013) fluid can also be promising sources of lung cancer biomarkers.

As saliva is a noninvasive body fluid, its use for diagnostic purposes would be desirable. Liu et al. applied lectin affinity chromatography to analyze the salivary N‐glycoproteome and identified over 300 N‐glycoproteins (Liu et al., 2020). In an earlier study by Xiao et al., salivary zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein (AZGP1) was identified as a potential lung cancer biomarker (Xiao et al., 2012). Therefore, the glycosylation of AZGP1 was investigated as well following two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis separation. A total of 22 glycan structures were characterized, of which 5 were found to be characteristic of lung cancer. Gao et al. aimed to explore whether the fucosylation of saliva glycoproteins discriminates AC, other noncancerous diseases and healthy individuals (Gao et al., 2022). Using PNGase F and specific fucosidase enzymes, an increase in α1,2, α1,3, and α1,6‐core fucosylation was observed in AC patients compared to healthy and noncancerous patients, highlighting their diagnostic potential.

3. O‐GLYCOSYLATION IN LUNG CANCER

The study of O‐glycan profiles is greatly limited primarily by the lack of enzymes capable of efficiently releasing all O‐glycans, resulting in difficult and time‐consuming analyses (Wilkinson & Saldova, 2020). Although far less literature sources are available about lung cancer O‐glycosylation than N‐glycosylation, O‐glycosylation changes and their potential diagnostic applications have been investigated in several other cancer types, including colorectal cancer (Takakura et al., 2023), ovarian cancer (An et al., 2006; Yang, Höti, et al., 2017) and breast cancer (Kirmiz et al., 2007).

An overview of the significance of mucin‐type O‐glycans in cancer (Zhang et al., 2022) and in other human diseases (Magalhães et al., 2021) can be found in recent literature. In short, while healthy cells have mature linear or branched O‐GalNAc glycans, cancer cells underexpress certain glycosyltransferases, and therefore truncated O‐GalNAc glycans containing a single O‐GalNAc (Tn antigen) or a sialylated O‐GalNAc (sTn) are prevalent (Doud & Yeh, 2023). High expression of Tn and sTn antigens have been observed in 10‐90% of samples in several cancer types, including lung cancer (Zhang et al., 2022). Overexpression of the Tn antigen is associated with metastasis formation, while overexpression of the sTn antigen is associated with tumorigenesis, and both are related to poor prognosis. The aberrant mucin‐type O‐glycosylation detected in cancer is generally accompanied by the differential expression of mucins.

As there is still a lack of mass spectrometry studies on the O‐glycosylation of lung cancer, we present some studies using other techniques. In a study by Liang et al., serum N‐ and O‐glycan profiles in AC and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) patients at various stages and healthy controls were analyzed using lectin microarray analysis (Liang et al., 2019). Increased levels of T (bearing O‐GalNAC‐Gal units) and Tn antigens in the serum of AC patients were observed, while lower intensities were detected in SqCC patients compared to healthy controls. Similarly, López‐Ferrer et al. detected T and Tn antigens more often in AC than in SqCC by immunohistochemical staining (López‐Ferrer et al., 2002). Therefore, these antigens may be potential markers for distinguishing NSCLC subtypes. However, the study by Liang et al. also reported that serum levels of T antigen were significantly elevated only in stage III and IV AC patients, suggesting that, similar to Tn and sTn antigens, they may be related to the poor prognosis of cancer.

4. PROTEOGLYCANS IN LUNG CANCER

Similar to O‐glycosylation, there is a lack of studies on GAGs. Recently, two papers on the GAG analysis of lung cancer tissue have been published. First, the CS and HS characteristics of tumor and tumor‐adjacent normal regions from AC, SqCC, LCC and SCLC patients were studied (Pál et al., 2023). A total of 77 CS and 76 HS samples were analyzed by on surface digestion using lyase enzymes. Statistically significant changes were identified only for chondroitin sulfates: the total CS disaccharide amount was higher in tumor compared to adjacent normal samples; the abundance of the non‐sulfated component (D0a0) decreased, while the amount of the monosulfated components (D0a4 and D0a6) increased in tumor samples, in line with an earlier study (Li et al., 2017). Comparing different tumor types, the CS 6‐O/4‐O‐sulfation ratio increased significantly in AC compared to the other tumor groups. Focusing on a specific gene mutation, 22 regions from 7 ALK‐rearranged AC tissues were investigated in detail and increased expression levels and sulfation of CS and HS chains were observed in tumors compared to adjacent normal regions (Balbisi et al., 2023). Tumor regions were characterized by three properties: morphological classification, mucin, and stromal content. Out of the three, classification based on mucin content resulted in complete separation in principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, indicating a strong relation between the mucin and GAG content of the tissue region.

As the aforementioned studies suggest, proteoglycans may play an important role in lung cancer. Understanding this is aided by experiments on cell cultures, and MS is a useful tool for this purpose. Serglycin was found to be frequently overexpressed in AC and it has been shown to promote NSCLC cell migration and invasion in a CD44 dependent manner (Guo et al., 2017). To gain insight into the underlying molecular mechanism, Guo et al. performed NSCLC cell culture experiments monitored by HPLC‐MS (Guo et al., 2020). The authors found that the CS‐GAG part of serglycin is the structural element that binds to the tumor cell surface CD44, thereby promoting cell migration. However, when the CS chain is removed, serglycin does not interact with CD44, which prevents cell migration. Another area of interest is the use of GAGs and their derivatives for inhibiting lung cancer. Hyaluronan tetrasaccharide has previously been used to inhibit triple‐negative breast cancer (Han et al., 2019), therefore, He et al. investigated the antitumor effects of hyaluronan tetrasaccharide derivatives on A549 AC cells (He et al., 2022). Hyaluronan tetrasaccharide derivatives containing up to 6 sulfate groups have been prepared, and those with moderate sulfation (2 or 3 sulfate units) reduced cell viability the most in vitro, and showed stronger antitumor activity in mice.

5. GLYCOPROTEINS INVOLVED IN LUNG CANCER ACCORDING TO PROTEOMIC STUDIES

In addition to the N‐/O‐glyco(proteo)mic and glycosaminoglycan studies discussed, several proteomic studies identified glycoproteins as potential lung cancer biomarkers. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid‐bound particles released from cells that play a pivotal role in cell signaling. As EVs reflect the physiological or pathological state of the cell from which they originate, they can be a useful source of biomarkers. Research focusing on EVs has grown substantially in the last decade (Couch et al., 2021; Mallia et al., 2020). Early proteomic studies revealed among others altered levels of haptoglobin, alpha‐2‐HS glycoprotein, alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein 1, protein leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein and alpha‐1B‐glycoprotein, in serum, tissue or urinary exosome (small EV) samples of NSCLC patients, which may be potential diagnostic biomarkers (Ayyub et al., 2016; Dowling et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012).

In addition to diagnostic biomarkers, there are efforts to identify predictive biomarkers that can be used to predict the outcome of therapeutic interventions. It has previously been shown that the combination of C‐reactive protein and leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein proteins from blood plasma can predict longer survival (>18 months) after 1 week of radiotherapy (Walker et al., 2015). Later, Mon et al. identified differentially expressed proteins in the serum of patients with advanced NSCLC who responded to carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy compared to non‐responders (Mon et al., 2021). Immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 3 was elevated, while alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein was decreased in responders as compared to non‐responders.

Although the studies presented illustrate the role of glycoproteins in cancer and their potential use as biomarkers, most biomarker studies are in the discovery phase, requiring validation in large cohorts and a rigorous approval process for their application in clinical practice (Davis et al., 2020). As a result, the number of glycoprotein biomarkers utilized in clinical practice for lung cancer diagnosis is very limited, for example, cancer antigen 15‐3 and carcinoembryonic antigen, but these are not lung cancer specific either (Chen et al., 2023; Lin & Lubman, 2024; Nath & Mukherjee, 2014).

6. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS

In this article, we reviewed the literature on the analysis of protein glycosylation in human lung cancer by mass spectrometry.

The majority of these studies focus on N‐glycosylation. In tissue, increases in high‐mannose glycans and terminal GlcNAc containing structures have been reported most frequently, whereas in serum and plasma, the amount of highly branched, sialylated glycans often increased, while the amount of biantennary glycans usually decreased. In glycoproteomics, most of the differentially expressed glycoproteins are extracellular or membrane proteins, which are mainly involved in cell adhesion, metabolism and immune response. There are glycoproteins whose altered expression and/or glycosylation pattern may be of diagnostic value, the most commonly studied ones being immunoglobulins, haptoglobin and CD proteins. Although the number of studies directed towards lung cancer O‐glycosylation and glycosaminoglycan characterization is very limited, it is clear that changes occur in both classes, mainly through increased levels of truncated O‐glycans and increased GAG sulfation.

Mass spectrometry detection of protein glycosylation in lung cancer is rapidly evolving due to new sample preparation strategies and the widespread use of increasingly sophisticated mass spectrometers, with Orbitraps most frequently used. However, the measurement results are limited by several factors, for example, many studies use routine proteomic collision energies in glycoproteomics, which highlights the need for careful consideration of analytical methods. In addition, different software and data analysis techniques are constantly being developed, which have improved the identification and quantification processes. Continued technical advances are expected in the future, which could lead towards more accurate, reliable and biologically meaningful insights in the field.

Mass spectrometry‐based studies to date have demonstrated that N‐glycosylation, O‐glycosylation, and glycosaminoglycan patterns of proteins are all altered in lung cancer, but the biological and clinical implications of these changes are yet to be thoroughly understood for a number of reasons. First, many studies have analyzed quite small sample sizes (see Table 1), limiting the reliability and generalizability of the results. Larger cohorts and further replication studies are necessary to establish robust associations between glycosylation changes and lung cancer, especially for specific subtypes or stages. Second, pre‐analytical factors such as cohort assembly, sample collection and storage need to be carefully considered and described in detail, which was not the case in all previous studies. Furthermore, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the disease and to develop generally applicable diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, studies across a broad spectrum of ethnicities are needed, enabling the interpretation of genetic and environmental variability.

In addition, the reliability of the biological conclusions of mass spectrometry‐based studies is closely related to analytical factors. The choice and efficiency of enrichment and purification methods, as well as the type and settings of mass spectrometers have a great impact on the accuracy and reliability of the data obtained. In addition, software used for data analysis and statistical approaches require careful consideration. Therefore, detailed documentation of sample preparation, measurement and evaluation is important to ensure reproducibility.

Last, although the studies provide insights into altered biological processes and potential biomarkers, the clinical translation of these results as reliable diagnostic or therapeutic tools is limited by the fact that many of the observed changes are related to the immune response rather than being specific to lung cancer, and especially to lung cancer subtypes. Therefore, moving towards clinical application would require rigorous validation in large and diverse patient populations using mass spectrometry and other analytical techniques.

In conclusion, the exploration of the role of protein glycosylation in lung cancer is still in the early stages, where further N‐glycosylation, O‐glycosylation and glycosaminoglycan analyses dealing with larger sample sizes are needed to enhance our understanding of biology, and to take steps towards clinical application.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Mirjam Balbisi: Conceptualization; investigation; writing—original draft. Simon Sugár: Investigation; writing—review and editing. Lilla Turiák: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; investigation; supervision; writing—review and editing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Lilla Turiák is grateful for the support of the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Project no. 2018‐1.2.1‐NKP‐2018‐00005 has been implemented with the support provided by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the 2018‐1.2.1‐NKP funding scheme. Project no. FK 131603 has been implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the FK_19 funding scheme. This project was supported by the Lendület (Momentum) Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS, MTA).

REFERENCES

  1. Addis, M. F. , Tanca, A. , Pagnozzi, D. , Crobu, S. , Fanciulli, G. , Cossu‐Rocca, P. and Uzzau, S. (2009). “Generation of high‐quality protein extracts from formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissues.” Proteomics 9(15): 3815–3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn, J. M. , Sung, H. J. , Yoon, Y. H. , Kim, B. G. , Yang, W. S. , Lee, C. , Park, H. M. , Kim, B. J. , Kim, B. G. , Lee, S. Y. , An, H. J. and Cho, J. Y. (2014). “Integrated glycoproteomics demonstrates fucosylated serum paraoxonase 1 alterations in small cell lung cancer.” Mol Cell Proteomics 13(1): 30–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn, Y. H. , Ji, E. S. , Oh, N. R. , Kim, Y. S. , Ko, J. H. and Yoo, J. S. (2014). “Differential proteomic approach for identification and verification of aberrantly glycosylated proteins in adenocarcinoma lung cancer (ADLC) plasmas by lectin‐capturing and targeted mass spectrometry.” J Proteomics 106: 221–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez, M. R. , Zhou, Q. , Tena, J. , Barboza, M. , Wong, M. , Xie, Y. , Lebrilla, C. B. , Cabanatan, M. , Barzaga, M. T. , Tan‐Liu, N. , Heralde, 3rd, F. M. , Serrano, L. , Nacario, R. C. and Completo, G. C. (2023). “Glycomic, glycoproteomic, and proteomic profiling of Philippine lung cancer and peritumoral tissues: Case series study of patients stages I‐III.” Cancers (Basel) 15(5); 1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez, M. R. S. , Zhou, Q. , Tena, J. , Lebrilla, C. B. , Completo, G. C. , Heralde, 3rd, F. M. , Cabanatan, M. , Barzaga, M. T. , Tan‐Liu, N. , Ladrera, G. I. , Danguilan, J. L. , Rabajante, J. , Padolina, I. and Nacario, R. C. (2022). “N‐glycan and glycopeptide serum biomarkers in Philippine lung cancer patients identified using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry.” ACS Omega 7(44): 40230–40240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. An, H. J. , Miyamoto, S. , Lancaster, K. S. , Kirmiz, C. , Li, B. , Lam, K. S. , Leiserowitz, G. S. and Lebrilla, C. B. (2006). “Profiling of glycans in serum for the discovery of potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer.” J Proteome Res 5(7): 1626–1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnold, J. N. , Wormald, M. R. , Sim, R. B. , Rudd, P. M. and Dwek, R. A. (2007). “The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins.” Annu Rev Immunol 25: 21–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayyub, A. , Saleem, M. , Fatima, I. , Tariq, A. , Hashmi, N. and Musharraf, S. G. (2016). “Glycosylated Alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein 1 as a potential lung cancer serum biomarker.” Int J Biochem Cell Biol 70: 68–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagdonaite, I. , Malaker, S. A. , Polasky, D. A. , Riley, N. M. , Schjoldager, K. , Vakhrushev, S. Y. , Halim, A. , Aoki‐Kinoshita, K. F. , Nesvizhskii, A. I. , Bertozzi, C. R. , Wandall, H. H. , Parker, B. L. , Thaysen‐Andersen, M. and Scott, N. E. (2022). “Glycoproteomics.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2(1): 48. [Google Scholar]
  10. Balbisi, M. , Sugár, S. , Schlosser, G. , Szeitz, B. , Fillinger, J. , Moldvay, J. , Drahos, L. , Szász, A. M. , Tóth, G. , & Turiák, L. (2023). Inter‐ and intratumoral proteomics and glycosaminoglycan characterization of ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma tissues: a pilot study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6268. 10.1038/s41598-023-33435-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boumahdi, S. and de Sauvage, F. J. (2020). “The great escape: tumour cell plasticity in resistance to targeted therapy.” Nat Rev Drug Discov 19(1): 39–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brockhausen, I. , Wandall, H. H. , Hagen, K. G. T. and Stanley, P. (2022). O‐GalNAc Glycans. Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet]. 4th edition. A. Varki, R. D. Cummings, J. D. Esko et al. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (NY).
  13. Chen, G. , Wang, Y. , Qin, X. , Li, H. , Guo, Y. , Wang, Y. , Liu, H. , Wang, X. , Song, G. , Li, F. , Li, F. , Guo, S. , Qiu, L. and Li, Z. (2013). “Change in IgG1 Fc N‐linked glycosylation in human lung cancer: age‐ and sex‐related diagnostic potential.” Electrophoresis 34(16): 2407–2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, J. , Yang, L. , Li, C. , Zhang, L. , Gao, W. , Xu, R. and Tian, R. (2023). “Chemical proteomic approach for in‐depth glycosylation profiling of plasma carcinoembryonic antigen in cancer patients.” Mol Cell Proteomics 22(11): 100662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chia, J. , Goh, G. and Bard, F. (2016). “Short O‐GalNAc glycans: regulation and role in tumor development and clinical perspectives.” Biochim Biophys Acta 1860(8): 1623–1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Conroy, L. R. , Chang, J. E. , Sun, Q. , Clarke, H. A. , Buoncristiani, M. D. , Young, L. E. A. , McDonald, R. J. , Liu, J. , Gentry, M. S. , Allison, D. B. and Sun, R. C. (2022). “High‐dimensionality reduction clustering of complex carbohydrates to study lung cancer metabolic heterogeneity.” Adv Cancer Res 154: 227–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cooper, A. J. , Sequist, L. V. and Lin, J. J. (2022). “Third‐generation EGFR and ALK inhibitors: mechanisms of resistance and management.” Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(8): 499–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Couch, Y. , Buzàs, E. I. , Di Vizio, D. , Gho, Y. S. , Harrison, P. , Hill, A. F. , Lötvall, J. , Raposo, G. , Stahl, P. D. , Théry, C. , Witwer, K. W. and Carter, D. R. F. (2021). “A brief history of nearly EV‐erything ‐ The rise and rise of extracellular vesicles.” J Extracell Vesicles 10(14): e12144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, K. D. , Aghaeepour, N. , Ahn, A. H. , Angst, M. S. , Borsook, D. , Brenton, A. , Burczynski, M. E. , Crean, C. , Edwards, R. , Gaudilliere, B. , Hergenroeder, G. W. , Iadarola, M. J. , Iyengar, S. , Jiang, Y. , Kong, J. T. , Mackey, S. , Saab, C. Y. , Sang, C. N. , Scholz, J. , Segerdahl, M. , Tracey, I. , Veasley, C. , Wang, J. , Wager, T. D. , Wasan, A. D. and Pelleymounter, M. A. (2020). “Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: challenges and opportunities.” Nat Rev Neurol 16(7): 381–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Doud, E. H. and Yeh, E. S. (2023). “Mass spectrometry‐based glycoproteomic workflows for cancer biomarker discovery.” Technol Cancer Res Treat 22: 15330338221148811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dowling, P. , O'Driscoll, L. , Meleady, P. , Henry, M. , Roy, S. , Ballot, J. , Moriarty, M. , Crown, J. and Clynes, M. (2007). “2‐D difference gel electrophoresis of the lung squamous cell carcinoma versus normal sera demonstrates consistent alterations in the levels of ten specific proteins.” Electrophoresis 28(23): 4302–4310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Du, Z. , Yang, Q. , Liu, Y. , Chen, S. , Zhao, H. , Bai, H. , Shao, W. , Zhang, Y. and Qin, W. (2022). “A new strategy for high‐efficient tandem enrichment and simultaneous profiling of N‐glycopeptides and phosphopeptides in lung cancer tissue.” Front Mol Biosci 9: 923363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fang, K. , Long, Q. , Liao, Z. , Zhang, C. and Jiang, Z. (2022). “Glycoproteomics revealed novel N‐glycosylation biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma cancers.” Clin Proteomics 19(1): 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao, Z. , Wu, Z. , Han, Y. , Zhang, X. , Hao, P. , Xu, M. , Huang, S. , Li, S. , Xia, J. , Jiang, J. and Yang, S. (2022). “Aberrant fucosylation of saliva glycoprotein defining lung adenocarcinomas malignancy.” ACS Omega 7(21): 17894–17906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gasparri, R. , Sedda, G. , Noberini, R. , Bonaldi, T. and Spaggiari, L. (2020). “Clinical application of mass spectrometry‐based proteomics in lung cancer early diagnosis.” Proteomics Clin Appl 14(5): e1900138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grodzka, A. , Knopik‐Skrocka, A. , Kowalska, K. , Kurzawa, P. , Krzyzaniak, M. , Stencel, K. and Bryl, M. (2023). “Molecular alterations of driver genes in non‐small cell lung cancer: from diagnostics to targeted therapy.” Excli j 22: 415–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo, J. Y. , Chiu, C. H. , Wang, M. J. , Li, F. A. and Chen, J. Y. (2020). “Proteoglycan serglycin promotes non‐small cell lung cancer cell migration through the interaction of its glycosaminoglycans with CD44.” J Biomed Sci 27(1): 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, J. Y. , Hsu, H. S. , Tyan, S. W. , Li, F. Y. , Shew, J. Y. , Lee, W. H. and Chen, J. Y. (2017). “Serglycin in tumor microenvironment promotes non‐small cell lung cancer aggressiveness in a CD44‐dependent manner.” Oncogene 36(17): 2457–2471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Han, W. , Song, L. , Wang, Y. , Lv, Y. , Chen, X. and Zhao, X. (2019). “Preparation, characterization, and inhibition of hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides in triple‐negative breast cancer.” Biomolecules 9(9); 436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. He, X. , Wang, S. , Liu, B. , Jiang, D. , Chen, F. , Mao, G. , Jin, W. , Pan, H. and Zhong, W. (2022). “Sulfated modification of hyaluronan tetrasaccharide enhances its antitumor activity on human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells in vitro and in vivo.” Bioorg Med Chem Lett 75: 128945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heo, S. H. , Lee, S. J. , Ryoo, H. M. , Park, J. Y. and Cho, J. Y. (2007). “Identification of putative serum glycoprotein biomarkers for human lung adenocarcinoma by multilectin affinity chromatography and LC‐MS/MS.” Proteomics 7(23): 4292–4302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hongsachart, P. , Huang‐Liu, R. , Sinchaikul, S. , Pan, F. M. , Phutrakul, S. , Chuang, Y. M. , Yu, C. J. and Chen, S. T. (2009). “Glycoproteomic analysis of WGA‐bound glycoprotein biomarkers in sera from patients with lung adenocarcinoma.” Electrophoresis 30(7): 1206–1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu, W. , Ge, W. , Xia, P. , Chen, Y. , Du, J. , Hu, G. , Wu, Z. , Zhang, X. , Yang, C. , Jiang, J. , Yang, S. and Xia, J. (2024). “Diagnostic potential of serum glycome analysis in lung cancer: A glycopattern study.” J Proteome Res 23(1): 500–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, W. , Luo, W. J. , Zhu, P. , Tang, J. , Yu, X. L. , Cui, H. Y. , Wang, B. , Zhang, Y. , Jiang, J. L. and Chen, Z. N. (2013). “Modulation of CD147‐induced matrix metalloproteinase activity: role of CD147 N‐glycosylation.” Biochem J 449(2): 437–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Illiano, A. , Pinto, G. , Melchiorre, C. , Carpentieri, A. , Faraco, V. and Amoresano, A. (2020). “Protein glycosylation investigated by mass spectrometry: an overview.” Cells 9(9); 1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. International Agency for Research on Cancer . (2023). “Cancer Today.” Retrieved August 3, 2023, from: https://gco.iarc.fr/
  37. Jezková, P. , Skřičková, J. , Wimmer, Jr., G. , Zelinková, J. , Zdráhal, Z. and Lattová, E. (2022). “Differentiation of sialyl linkages using a combination of alkyl esterification and phenylhydrazine derivatization: application for n‐glycan profiling in the sera of patients with lung cancer.” Anal Chem 94(18): 6736–6744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin, Y. , Wang, J. , Ye, X. , Su, Y. , Yu, G. , Yang, Q. , Liu, W. , Yu, W. , Cai, J. , Chen, X. , Liang, Y. , Chen, Y. , Wong, B. H. , Fu, X. and Sun, H. (2016). “Identification of GlcNAcylated alpha‐1‐antichymotrypsin as an early biomarker in human non‐small‐cell lung cancer by quantitative proteomic analysis with two lectins.” Br J Cancer 114(5): 532–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jin, Y. , Yang, Y. , Su, Y. , Ye, X. , Liu, W. , Yang, Q. , Wang, J. , Fu, X. , Gong, Y. and Sun, H. (2019). “Identification a novel clinical biomarker in early diagnosis of human non‐small cell lung cancer.” Glycoconj J 36(1): 57–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Karve, T. M. and Cheema, A. K. (2011). “Small changes huge impact: the role of protein posttranslational modifications in cellular homeostasis and disease.” J Amino Acids 2011: 207691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kawahara, R. , Chernykh, A. , Alagesan, K. , Bern, M. , Cao, W. , Chalkley, R. J. , Cheng, K. , Choo, M. S. , Edwards, N. , Goldman, R. , Hoffmann, M. , Hu, Y. , Huang, Y. , Kim, J. Y. , Kletter, D. , Liquet, B. , Liu, M. , Mechref, Y. , Meng, B. , Neelamegham, S. , Nguyen‐Khuong, T. , Nilsson, J. , Pap, A. , Park, G. W. , Parker, B. L. , Pegg, C. L. , Penninger, J. M. , Phung, T. K. , Pioch, M. , Rapp, E. , Sakalli, E. , Sanda, M. , Schulz, B. L. , Scott, N. E. , Sofronov, G. , Stadlmann, J. , Vakhrushev, S. Y. , Woo, C. M. , Wu, H. Y. , Yang, P. , Ying, W. , Zhang, H. , Zhang, Y. , Zhao, J. , Zaia, J. , Haslam, S. M. , Palmisano, G. , Yoo, J. S. , Larson, G. , Khoo, K. H. , Medzihradszky, K. F. , Kolarich, D. , Packer, N. H. and Thaysen‐Andersen, M. (2021). “Community evaluation of glycoproteomics informatics solutions reveals high‐performance search strategies for serum glycopeptide analysis.” Nat Methods 18(11): 1304–1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, J. Y. , Kim, S. K. , Kang, D. and Moon, M. H. (2012). “Dual lectin‐based size sorting strategy to enrich targeted N‐glycopeptides by asymmetrical flow field‐flow fractionation: profiling lung cancer biomarkers.” Anal Chem 84(12): 5343–5350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kirmiz, C. , Li, B. , An, H. J. , Clowers, B. H. , Chew, H. K. , Lam, K. S. , Ferrige, A. , Alecio, R. , Borowsky, A. D. , Sulaimon, S. , Lebrilla, C. B. and Miyamoto, S. (2007). “A serum glycomics approach to breast cancer biomarkers.” Mol Cell Proteomics 6(1): 43–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kubaski, F. , Osago, H. , Mason, R. W. , Yamaguchi, S. , Kobayashi, H. , Tsuchiya, M. , Orii, T. and Tomatsu, S. (2017). “Glycosaminoglycans detection methods: applications of mass spectrometry.” Mol Genet Metab 120(1–2): 67–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lageveen‐Kammeijer, G. S. M. , de Haan, N. , Mohaupt, P. , Wagt, S. , Filius, M. , Nouta, J. , Falck, D. and Wuhrer, M. (2019). “Highly sensitive CE‐ESI‐MS analysis of N‐glycans from complex biological samples.” Nat Commun 10(1): 2137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lageveen‐Kammeijer, G. S. M. , Kuster, B. , Reusch, D. and Wuhrer, M. (2022). “High sensitivity glycomics in biomedicine.” Mass Spectrom Rev 41(6): 1014–1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lattová, E. , Skřičková, J. and Zdráhal, Z. (2019). “Applicability of phenylhydrazine labeling for structural studies of fucosylated N‐glycans.” Anal Chem 91(13): 7985–7990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lawrence, R. , Lu, H. , Rosenberg, R. D. , Esko, J. D. and Zhang, L. (2008). “Disaccharide structure code for the easy representation of constituent oligosaccharides from glycosaminoglycans.” Nat Methods 5(4): 291–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, S. Y. , Lee, S. , Park, S. B. , Kim, K. Y. , Hong, J. and Kang, D. (2018). “Development of a parallel microbore hollow fiber enzyme reactor platform for online (18)O‐labeling: application to lectin‐specific lung cancer N‐glycoproteome.” J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1100–1101: 58–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, F. , Glinskii, O. V. and Glinsky, V. V. (2013). “Glycobioinformatics: current strategies and tools for data mining in MS‐based glycoproteomics.” Proteomics 13(2): 341–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, G. , Li, L. , Joo, E. J. , Son, J. W. , Kim, Y. J. , Kang, J. K. , Lee, K. B. , Zhang, F. and Linhardt, R. J. (2017). “Glycosaminoglycans and glycolipids as potential biomarkers in lung cancer.” Glycoconj J 34(5): 661–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li, Q. K. , Shah, P. , Li, Y. , Aiyetan, P. O. , Chen, J. , Yung, R. , Molena, D. , Gabrielson, E. , Askin, F. , Chan, D. W. and Zhang, H. (2013). “Glycoproteomic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid identifies tumor‐associated glycoproteins from lung adenocarcinoma.” J Proteome Res 12(8): 3689–3696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, Y. , Zhang, Y. , Qiu, F. and Qiu, Z. (2011). “Proteomic identification of exosomal LRG1: a potential urinary biomarker for detecting NSCLC.” Electrophoresis 32(15): 1976–1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liang, Y. , Han, P. , Wang, T. , Ren, H. , Gao, L. , Shi, P. , Zhang, S. , Yang, A. , Li, Z. and Chen, M. (2019). “Stage‐associated differences in the serum N‐ and O‐glycan profiles of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer.” Clin Proteomics 16: 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lin, B. , Qing, X. , Liao, J. and Zhuo, K. (2020). “Role of protein glycosylation in host‐pathogen interaction.” Cells 9(4); 1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lin, Y. and Lubman, D. M. (2024). “The role of N‐glycosylation in cancer.” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 14(3), 1098–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ling, B. , Zhang, Z. , Xiang, Z. , Cai, Y. , Zhang, X. and Wu, J. (2022). “Advances in the application of proteomics in lung cancer.” Front Oncol 12: 993781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu, S. , Jiang, X. , Shang, Z. , Ji, Y. , Wang, H. , Wang, Z. , Wang, P. , Zhang, Y. and Xiao, H. (2020). “N‐glycan structures of target cancer biomarker characterized by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.” Anal Chim Acta 1123: 18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu, Y. , Luo, X. , Hu, H. , Wang, R. , Sun, Y. , Zeng, R. and Chen, H. (2012). “Integrative proteomics and tissue microarray profiling indicate the association between overexpressed serum proteins and non‐small cell lung cancer.” PLoS One 7(12): e51748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. López‐Ferrer, A. , Barranco, C. and de Bolós, C. (2002). “Differences in the O‐glycosylation patterns between lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.” Am J Clin Pathol 118(5): 749–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Magalhães, A. , Duarte, H. O. and Reis, C. A. (2021). “The role of O‐glycosylation in human disease.” Mol Aspects Med 79: 100964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mallia, A. , Gianazza, E. , Zoanni, B. , Brioschi, M. , Barbieri, S. S. and Banfi, C. (2020). “Proteomics of extracellular vesicles: update on their composition, biological roles and potential use as diagnostic tools in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.” Diagnostics (Basel) 10(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Molina, J. R. , Yang, P. , Cassivi, S. D. , Schild, S. E. and Adjei, A. A. (2008). “Non‐small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship.” Mayo Clin Proc 83(5): 584–594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mon, M. M. , Srisomsap, C. , Chokchaichamnankit, D. , Watcharatanyatip, K. , Weeraphan, C. , Svasti, J. , Maneechai, K. , Thongsuksai, P. and Raungrut, P. (2021). “Serum proteomic profiling reveals differentially expressed IGHG3 and A1AG1 as potential predictors of chemotherapeutic response in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer.” Anticancer Res 41(4): 1871–1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mulloy, B. , Lever, R. and Page, C. P. (2017). “Mast cell glycosaminoglycans.” Glycoconj J 34(3): 351–361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Munkley, J. and Elliott, D. J. (2016). “Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer.” Oncotarget 7(23): 35478–35489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Nath, S. and Mukherjee, P. (2014). “MUC1: a multifaceted oncoprotein with a key role in cancer progression.” Trends Mol Med 20(6): 332–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nishimura, T. , Nakamura, H. , Végvári, Á. , Marko‐Varga, G. , Furuya, N. and Saji, H. (2019). “Current status of clinical proteogenomics in lung cancer.” Expert Rev Proteomics 16(9): 761–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. O'Rourke, M. B. and Padula, M. P. (2016). “Analysis of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue via proteomic techniques and misconceptions of antigen retrieval.” Biotechniques 60(5): 229–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pál, D. , Tóth, G. , Sugár, S. , Fügedi, K. D. , Szabó, D. , Kovalszky, I. , Papp, D. , Schlosser, G. , Tóth, C. , Tornóczky, T. , Drahos, L. , & Turiák, L. (2023). Compositional analysis of glycosaminoglycans in different lung cancer types—a pilot study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7050. 10.3390/ijms24087050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Peixoto, A. , Relvas‐Santos, M. , Azevedo, R. , Santos, L. L. and Ferreira, J. A. (2019). “Protein glycosylation and tumor microenvironment alterations driving cancer hallmarks.” Front Oncol 9: 380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pepi, L. E. , Sanderson, P. , Stickney, M. and Amster, I. J. (2021). “Developments in mass spectrometry for glycosaminoglycan analysis: a review.” Mol Cell Proteomics 20: 100025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pietrowska, M. , Wlosowicz, A. , Gawin, M. and Widlak, P. (2019). “MS‐based proteomic analysis of serum and plasma: problem of high abundant components and lights and shadows of albumin removal.” Adv Exp Med Biol 1073: 57–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Pomin, V. H. and Mulloy, B. (2018). “Glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans.” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 11(1); 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Qin, W. , Zhang, Z. , Qin, R. , Han, J. , Zhao, R. , Gu, Y. , Pan, Y. , Gu, J. and Ren, S. (2019). “Providing Bionic Glycome as internal standards by glycan reducing and isotope labeling for reliable and simple quantitation of N‐glycome based on MALDI‐ MS.” Anal Chim Acta 1081: 112–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Reid, D. J. , Thibert, S. and Zhou, M. (2023). “Dissecting the structural heterogeneity of proteins by native mass spectrometry.” Protein Sci 32(4): e4612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Reiding, K. R. , Blank, D. , Kuijper, D. M. , Deelder, A. M. and Wuhrer, M. (2014). “High‐throughput profiling of protein N‐glycosylation by MALDI‐TOF‐MS employing linkage‐specific sialic acid esterification.” Anal Chem 86(12): 5784–5793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rho, J. H. , Roehrl, M. H. and Wang, J. Y. (2009). “Glycoproteomic analysis of human lung adenocarcinomas using glycoarrays and tandem mass spectrometry: differential expression and glycosylation patterns of vimentin and fetuin A isoforms.” Protein J 28(3–4): 148–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rodrigues, J. G. , Balmaña, M. , Macedo, J. A. , Poças, J. , Fernandes, Â. , de‐Freitas‐Junior, J. C. M. , Pinho, S. S. , Gomes, J. , Magalhães, A. , Gomes, C. , Mereiter, S. and Reis, C. A. (2018). “Glycosylation in cancer: Selected roles in tumour progression, immune modulation and metastasis.” Cell Immunol 333: 46–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Rodriguez‐Canales, J. , Parra‐Cuentas, E. and Wistuba, II . (2016). “Diagnosis and molecular classification of lung cancer.” Cancer Treat Res 170: 25–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ruhaak, L. R. , Nguyen, U. T. , Stroble, C. , Taylor, S. L. , Taguchi, A. , Hanash, S. M. , Lebrilla, C. B. , Kim, K. and Miyamoto, S. (2013). “Enrichment strategies in glycomics‐based lung cancer biomarker development.” Proteomics Clin Appl 7(9–10): 664–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ruhaak, L. R. , Stroble, C. , Dai, J. , Barnett, M. , Taguchi, A. , Goodman, G. E. , Miyamoto, S. , Gandara, D. , Feng, Z. , Lebrilla, C. B. and Hanash, S. (2016). “Serum glycans as risk markers for non‐small cell lung cancer.” Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 9(4): 317–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Satomaa, T. , Heiskanen, A. , Leonardsson, I. , Angström, J. , Olonen, A. , Blomqvist, M. , Salovuori, N. , Haglund, C. , Teneberg, S. , Natunen, J. , Carpén, O. and Saarinen, J. (2009). “Analysis of the human cancer glycome identifies a novel group of tumor‐associated N‐acetylglucosamine glycan antigens.” Cancer Res 69(14): 5811–5819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sim, G. , Jeong, M. , Seo, H. , Kim, J. and Lee, S. (2022). “The role of N‐glycosylation in the intracellular trafficking and functionality of neuronal growth regulator 1.” Cells 11(7); 1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Soltermann, A. , Ossola, R. , Kilgus‐Hawelski, S. , von Eckardstein, A. , Suter, T. , Aebersold, R. and Moch, H. (2008). “N‐glycoprotein profiling of lung adenocarcinoma pleural effusions by shotgun proteomics.” Cancer 114(2): 124–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Stanley, P. (2011). “Golgi glycosylation.” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3(4); a005199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Stanley, P. , Moremen, K. W. , Lewis, N. E. , Taniguchi, N. and Aebi, M. (2022). N‐Glycans. Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet]. 4th edition. A. Varki, R. D. Cummings, J. D. Esko et al. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (NY).
  88. Suster, D. I. and Mino‐Kenudson, M. (2020). “Molecular pathology of primary non‐small cell lung cancer.” Arch Med Res 51(8): 784–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Takakura, D. , Ohashi, S. , Kobayashi, N. , Tokuhisa, M. , Ichikawa, Y. and Kawasaki, N. (2023). “Targeted O‐glycoproteomics for the development of diagnostic markers for advanced colorectal cancer.” Front Oncol 13: 1104936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Travis, W. D. , Brambilla, E. , Nicholson, A. G. , Yatabe, Y. , Austin, J. H. M. , Beasley, M. B. , Chirieac, L. R. , Dacic, S. , Duhig, E. , Flieder, D. B. , Geisinger, K. , Hirsch, F. R. , Ishikawa, Y. , Kerr, K. M. , Noguchi, M. , Pelosi, G. , Powell, C. A. , Tsao, M. S. and Wistuba, I. (2015). “The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification.” J Thorac Oncol 10(9): 1243–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Tsai, H. Y. , Boonyapranai, K. , Sriyam, S. , Yu, C. J. , Wu, S. W. , Khoo, K. H. , Phutrakul, S. and Chen, S. T. (2011). “Glycoproteomics analysis to identify a glycoform on haptoglobin associated with lung cancer.” Proteomics 11(11): 2162–2170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tsai, P. L. and Chen, S. F. (2017). “A brief review of bioinformatics tools for glycosylation analysis by mass spectrometry.” Mass Spectrom (Tokyo) 6(Spec Iss): S0064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ueda, K. , Katagiri, T. , Shimada, T. , Irie, S. , Sato, T. A. , Nakamura, Y. and Daigo, Y. (2007). “Comparative profiling of serum glycoproteome by sequential purification of glycoproteins and 2‐nitrobenzensulfenyl (NBS) stable isotope labeling: a new approach for the novel biomarker discovery for cancer.” J Proteome Res 6(9): 3475–3483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Walker, M. J. , Zhou, C. , Backen, A. , Pernemalm, M. , Williamson, A. J. , Priest, L. J. , Koh, P. , Faivre‐Finn, C. , Blackhall, F. H. , Dive, C. and Whetton, A. D. (2015). “Discovery and validation of predictive biomarkers of survival for non‐small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy: two proteins with predictive value.” EBioMedicine 2(8): 841–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang, D. , Hincapie, M. , Rejtar, T. and Karger, B. L. (2011). “Ultrasensitive characterization of site‐specific glycosylation of affinity‐purified haptoglobin from lung cancer patient plasma using 10 μm i.d. porous layer open tubular liquid chromatography‐linear ion trap collision‐induced dissociation/electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry.” Anal Chem 83(6): 2029–2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wang, M. , Herbst, R. S. and Boshoff, C. (2021). “Toward personalized treatment approaches for non‐small‐cell lung cancer.” Nat Med 27(8): 1345–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang, X. , Deng, Z. , Huang, C. , Zhu, T. , Lou, J. , Wang, L. and Li, Y. (2018). “Differential N‐glycan patterns identified in lung adenocarcinoma by N‐glycan profiling of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue sections.” J Proteomics 172: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang, X. , Zhang, H. and Chen, X. (2019). “Drug resistance and combating drug resistance in cancer.” Cancer Drug Resist 2(2): 141–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wen, C. L. , Chen, K. Y. , Chen, C. T. , Chuang, J. G. , Yang, P. C. and Chow, L. P. (2012). “Development of an AlphaLISA assay to quantify serum core‐fucosylated E‐cadherin as a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma biomarker.” J Proteomics 75(13): 3963–3976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wilkinson, H. and Saldova, R. (2020). “Current methods for the characterization of O‐glycans.” J Proteome Res 19(10): 3890–3905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. World Cancer Research Fund International . (2023). “Cancer survival statistics.” Retrieved August 3, 2023, from: https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/cancer-survival-statistics/
  102. Wu, Y. , Wang, C. , Luo, J. , Liu, Y. , Zhang, L. , Xia, Y. , Feng, X. , Liu, B. F. , Lin, Y. and Liu, X. (2017). “Microwave‐assisted deglycosylation for rapid and sensitive analysis of N‐glycans via glycosylamine derivatization.” Anal Bioanal Chem 409(16): 4027–4036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Xiao, H. , Suttapitugsakul, S. , Sun, F. and Wu, R. (2018). “Mass spectrometry‐based chemical and enzymatic methods for global analysis of protein glycosylation.” Acc Chem Res 51(8): 1796–1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Xiao, H. , Zhang, L. , Zhou, H. , Lee, J. M. , Garon, E. B. and Wong, D. T. (2012). “Proteomic analysis of human saliva from lung cancer patients using two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.” Mol Cell Proteomics 11(2): M111.012112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Xie, Y. , Mota, L. M. , Bergin, A. , O'Flaherty, R. , Jones, A. , Morgan, B. and Butler, M. (2021). “High‐throughput and high‐sensitivity N‐Glycan profiling: A platform for biopharmaceutical development and disease biomarker discovery.” Anal Biochem 623: 114205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yamada, S. , Sugahara, K. and Ozbek, S. (2011). “Evolution of glycosaminoglycans: Comparative biochemical study.” Commun Integr Biol 4(2): 150–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yang, H. and Tian, Z. (2022). “Sialic acid linkage‐specific quantitative N‐glycoproteomics using selective alkylamidation and multiplex TMT‐labeling.” Anal Chim Acta 1230: 340391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Yang, S. , Höti, N. , Yang, W. , Liu, Y. , Chen, L. , Li, S. and Zhang, H. (2017). “Simultaneous analyses of N‐linked and O‐linked glycans of ovarian cancer cells using solid‐phase chemoenzymatic method.” Clin Proteomics 14: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Yang, Y. , Franc, V. and Heck, A. J. R. (2017). “Glycoproteomics: a balance between high‐throughput and in‐depth analysis.” Trends Biotechnol 35(7): 598–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zaia, J. (2010). “Mass spectrometry and glycomics.” Omics 14(4): 401–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zeng, X. , Hood, B. L. , Sun, M. , Conrads, T. P. , Day, R. S. , Weissfeld, J. L. , Siegfried, J. M. and Bigbee, W. L. (2010). “Lung cancer serum biomarker discovery using glycoprotein capture and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.” J Proteome Res 9(12): 6440–6449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang, D. , Li, X. , Liu, X. , Wang, Y. , Zhang, M. , Wang, Q. , Chen, T. and Li, Z. (2020). “Disease‐specific IgG Fc glycosylation ratios as personalized biomarkers to differentiate non‐small cell lung cancer from benign lung diseases.” Proteomics Clin Appl 14(1): e1900016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang, Y. , Sun, L. , Lei, C. , Li, W. , Han, J. , Zhang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2022). “A sweet warning: mucin‐type O‐glycans in cancer.” Cells 11(22); 3666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhou, J. , Du, Y. , Lai, Z. , Chen, T. and Li, Z. (2023). “Intra‐individual variation in disease‐specific IgG Fc glycoform ratios to monitor the disease progression of lung cancer.” J Proteome Res 22(1): 246–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mass Spectrometry Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES