Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Mar 23;20(13):10484–10497. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c19864

Voltage-Driven Generation of Ferromagnetism in a Magneto-Ionically Active Antiferromagnet Enabling Room-Temperature Exchange Bias

Simone Privitera †,‡, Zheng Ma †,*, Hugo Gómez-Torres †,‡, Aitor Arredondo-López †, Maciej Oskar Liedke §, Eric Hirschmann §, Andreas Wagner §, Huan Tan †, Pau Solsona †, Alberto Quintana †,‡, Thiago Dias ∥, Diane Gouéré ⊥, Elmer Monteblanco ⊥, Dafiné Ravelosona ⊥,#, Nuria Del-Valle †, Carles Navau †, Aitor Lopeandia †,‡,*, Jordi Sort †,‡,¶,*, Enric Menéndez †,*
PMCID: PMC13063812  PMID: 41871037

Abstract

Magneto-ionics–as the voltage-driven control of magnetic properties through ionic motion and redox processes–offers a promising route toward energy-efficient spintronic devices. Exchange bias, being the unidirectional anisotropy arising from interfacial coupling between antiferromagnets and ferromagnets, plays a central role in spintronics. Here, we demonstrate reversible, room-temperature magneto-ionic generation, suppression, and modulation of exchange bias within a 50 nm-thick antiferromagnetic, magneto-ionically active NiCoO layer. Instead of relying on field cooling to set exchange bias, an applied magnetic field during the growth promotes alignment of the antiferromagnetic spin sublattices, producing a preferential unidirectional orientation. Gating drives oxygen-ion migration along columnar grain boundaries, partially reducing NiCoO and forming ferromagnetic NiCo clusters that couple to the antiferromagnetic matrix. The exchange bias can be controlled by tuning the Ni/Co ratio, which adjusts the Néel temperature, and by varying the actuation time and voltage amplitude which control ferromagnetic cluster size. Micromagnetic simulations reveal that the exchange bias originates from the interfacial uncompensated spins exhibiting partial ferromagnetic-like behavior. This single-layer approach, together with the voltage-controlled formation and tuning of exchange bias without heat treatments, simplifies fabrication and offers a framework for low-power antiferromagnetic spintronic devices.

Keywords: voltage control of magnetism, magneto-ionics, antiferromagnetism, exchange bias, nanocalorimetry


graphic file with name nn5c19864_0010.jpg


graphic file with name nn5c19864_0008.jpg

Introduction

Magneto-ionics, which exploits voltage-driven ion transport and redox reactions to manipulate magnetism in a nonvolatile manner, has emerged as a compelling route for revolutionizing spin-electronics from an energy-efficiency viewpoint and for the development of novel data-processing paradigms, such as neuromorphic computing. , Even though magneto-ionics can involve various types of ions, such as O2–, − N3–, , H+, Li+, F– or OH–, oxygen stands out due to its chemical stability, number of materials available, and compatibility with complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Magneto-ionics has been widely applied to control the properties of ferromagnetic (FM) materials (e.g., coercivity, saturation magnetization, ,, magnetic anisotropy, , Curie temperature , or the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, among others), eventually enabling transformations between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases , and transitions between vortex and single domain states. Magneto-ionic can also tailor the RKKY interaction in synthetic antiferromagnets, as well as exchange bias (EB) in ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic (AFM) heterostructures. − The latter is particularly relevant for the voltage control of spin valves and magnetic tunnel junctions, which constitute the fundamental building blocks of spintronic technologies. To date, several magneto-ionic approaches have been employed to control EB via liquid or solid-state gating. However, fully voltage-programmable exchange bias, encompassing its generation, suppression, and continuous modulation at room temperature (RT), has yet to be realized. Existing demonstrations often rely on complex heterostructures that hinder scalability and require thermal treatments that compromise energy efficiency. Achieving reliable EB control through magneto-ionics remains crucial, as antiferromagnets offer the stability and scalability required for high-density integration, and could enable energy-efficient, voltage-programmable AFM spintronic devices. − Liu et al. demonstrated upon field cooling, the modulation of EB in a Gd/NiCoO/CoNi system, where initial CoNi formation is driven by chemical reactivity differences (not by voltage means), and additional CoNi originates from the voltage-driven reduction of NiCoO. − In perovskite oxide heterostructures, such as La0.8Sr0.2CoO3/La0.67Sr0.33MnO3, oxygen migration can generate EB but at very low temperatures (5 K). Similarly, multilayer stacks like Pt/[Co/Ni]/HfO2 require long voltage pulses and low temperatures (<200 K) to sustain EB. , Beyond oxygen, other mobile ions have been explored for EB control, offering faster response time and lower threshold voltage but still requiring high temperature annealing and sometimes showing limited stability. H+-based systems can modulate EB in milliseconds as demonstrated by Beach et al. , in NiO/Pd/Co/Pd/GdO x /Au and GdO x /Co0.8Ni0.2O/Co stacks via gating-induced transport of hydrogen, sourced by water dissociation in high humidity atmospheres. N3– diffusion in Ta/MnN/CoFe/Ta stacks and Li+ intercalation in a lithium-ion battery structure LiCoO2/Lithium-Ion Conducting Glass (LICGC)/NiO/Co can also produce EB, typically involving high temperature processing. Remarkably, most previous studies have achieved magneto-ionic control of exchange bias in FM/AFM bilayers, where the applied voltage modifies either the FM or the AFM phase through electric-field-induced ion motion. In all cases, field cooling was required to establish exchange bias, a process that undermines energy efficiency. Developing approaches that enable direct, voltage-driven modulation of exchange bias–without field cooling and preferably within a single magneto-ionic layer–would constitute a relevant step toward AFM spintronics. While magneto-ionics has been widely applied to ferromagnetic systems, its potential in tuning the properties of antiferromagnetic materials remains overlooked. Here, we report on the voltage-programmable control (i.e., generation, suppression, and modulation) at RT of EB in a single NiCoO film, without any prethermal activation or field cooling. Domain-oriented AFM NiCoO films with tunable Ni/Co ratios (i.e., Ni x Co1‑x O)–and hence tailored Néel temperatures (T N )–are grown at RT by reactive sputtering under an applied magnetic field. NiCoO is intentionally selected as a model system in which antiferromagnetic order and ionic transport can be balanced. While Ni incorporation strengthens antiferromagnetic coupling and supports room-temperature exchange bias, excessive Ni content tends to suppress ion mobility. The Ni concentration is therefore minimized to maintain antiferromagnetic order while ensuring the voltage-driven formation of ferromagnetic clusters at room temperature. During magneto-ionic actuation–measured along the direction of the growth field–voltage-driven reduction of NiCoO leads to the formation of NiCo clusters along columnar grain boundaries, which act as diffusion channels. These generated clusters create AFM/FM coupled regions embedded within the AFM matrix. Our approach offers several key advantages over prior work. First, it enables fully voltage-driven, room-temperature ON/OFF control of EB, rather than mere voltage modulation. Second, the process is inherently simple, relying on a single-layer architecture without the need for field cooling. Overall, this work demonstrates a scalable, low-power platform where the antiferromagnet itself serves as an active magneto-ionic component, in contrast to conventional EB devices where the AFM usually plays a passive role and need others layers to be useful. These features provide a basis for next-generation energy-efficient AFM spintronic devices.

Results and Discussion

50 nm-thick AFM polycrystalline Ni x Co1‑x O thin films (with x = 0, 0.2, 0.25, 0.35, and 0.4) were grown at RT using DC reactive cosputtering, aiming to systematically tune the T N through the controlled adjustment of the Ni/Co ratio. The films were grown on partly masked Si(100) substrates, previously coated with 20 nm of Ti and 60 nm of Cu, which serve as bottom electrode (Figure a,b). The Ni x Co1‑x O film tends to show a columnar-like microstructure (Figure b), as often seen in Co oxide systems. During deposition, an out-of-plane magnetized NdFeB permanent magnet with a saturation magnetization of 1145.2 emu·cm–3 was positioned adjacent to the sample (Figure a), such that its stray magnetic field (H growth) promotes the preferential orientation of AFM domains during film growth. This results in an oriented AFM state that defines the anisotropy direction of the AFM matrix without the need for postdeposition field cooling. This behavior is favored by the A-type AFM structure of NiCoO, in which spins are ferromagnetically coupled within atomic planes while adjacent planes are coupled antiferromagnetically (Figure c). All films were grown under H growth unless stated otherwise. Figure a also shows the sample position during deposition, together with the spatial distribution, uniformity, and magnitude of the magnetic field generated by the permanent magnet (see Methods). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of CoO, which serves as a reference, confirms the formation of a rocksalt-type structure (see Figure S1, Supporting Information), which is linked to the existence of AFM behavior. The peak located at 2θ ≈ 61.5° is unambiguously associated with CoO (not overlapping with Co3O4), which corresponds to the (220) reflection of the rocksalt phase of CoO (PDF 00-001-1227). In Ni0.25Co0.75O, the (220) peak is shifted to a slightly higher 2θ angle compared to CoO, falling between the (220) reflections of pure CoO and NiO, evidencing the formation of a ternary rocksalt NiCoO phase. To investigate the role of H growth in film microstructure, CoO films, rather than NiCoO, were grown with and without the permanent magnet. This choice minimizes variables, isolates the effect of the magnetic field, and ensures a high signal-to-noise ratio, while excluding any additional influence from Ni. The films were characterized by θ/2θ XRD. As shown in Figure S1c, the (220) XRD peak of the film grown in the presence of the permanent magnet exhibits a slightly narrower full width at half-maximum (fwhm), consistent with a larger crystallite size. Rietveld refinements of the full θ/2θ diffraction patterns were performed using the MAUD software to quantify the crystallite size. While the film grown without an applied magnetic field shows a crystallite size of 37 ± 3 nm, the film grown under a magnetic field exhibits a larger crystallite size of 44 nm ± 3 nm. These results indicate that the presence of a magnetic field during growth has a subtle effect on the film microstructure, tending to promote slightly larger crystallites. Nanocalorimetry was used to determine the T N of the Ni x Co1‑x O films grown under H growth (Figure d). The peak of the heat capacity at a constant pressure (C P) vs. temperature T shifts to higher temperatures as the Ni content increases, reflecting the corresponding rise in T N (see Methods). Moreover nanocalorimetry measurements of a NiCoO film grown with and without H growth reveal distinct magnitudes of heat capacity near the AFM-paramagnetic transition, identified by the peak position T N: the film grown under H growth exhibits an enhanced heat capacity (Figure e). Additionally, the inset of Figure e reveals the accumulated entropy variation (ΔS) associated with the order–disorder transition in the 240–370 K range, where experimental data is available. For comparable sample masses, the specimen grown under a magnetic field exhibits an entropy change about 30% larger than that of the sample grown without the field. This enhanced ΔS indicates a greater volume fraction involved in the AFM transition, consistent with an increased domain size. Atoms located at domain boundaries or in the interdomain regions are more weakly coupled and thus do not contribute appreciably to the transition or to the entropy change. The reduced entropy variation in the sample grown without field is therefore attributed to a higher fraction of such loosely coupled atoms, likely associated with an enhanced AFM domain density. This behavior is consistent with a more ordered AFM state produced by the field-assisted growth: H growth aligns AFM domains during deposition, creating a preferential direction of domain orientation.

1.

1

Growth of domain-oriented AFM Ni x Co1‑x O (where x = 0.2, 0.25, 0.35 and 0.4) films. (a) Distribution of the magnetic field generated by the NdFeB magnet, H growth. See Methods section for details of the calculations. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the cross section of an as-grown Ni0.25Co0.75O film showing its columnar-like structure. (c) Schematics evidencing the role of H growth while deposition in the AFM domain configuration achieved in the NiCoO films. (d) Heat capacity as a function of temperature measured for Ni x Co1‑x O films with different Ni/Co ratios. (e) Heat capacity as a function of temperature for a Ni0.35Co0.65O film grown with and without applied magnetic field during sputtering. The blue dashed line represents the Debye fitting used to subtract the phononic contribution (see Methods for further details). The inset displays the accumulated entropy variation associated with the order–disorder transition between 240 and 370 K.

Figure a schematically illustrates the electrolyte-cell operating in capacitor-like configuration used to gate the films (see Methods for further details). In our device configuration, the gating voltage is defined with respect to the top Pt foil, while the Cu layer serves as the working electrode. Within this convention, applying a negative voltage drives O2– ions out of the NiCoO layer toward the electrolyte, effectively reducing the oxide. Conversely, a positive gating voltage promotes oxygen incorporation into the NiCoO layer, corresponding to oxidation. All as-grown films are virtually nonferromagnetic, consistent with the formation of AFM phases, as evidenced by the magnetization (M) vs. applied magnetic field (H) measurement recorded by vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) for an as-grown Ni0.35Co0.65O film (Figure S2a). No measurable shift along the easy axis was observed, confirming the absence of EB prior to voltage actuation. The small residual magnetic signal detected in the as-grown state is therefore attributed to trace Fe impurities in the substrate and/or tiny off-stoichiometric regions within the film. M-H measurements by VSM were acquired at RT and with the applied magnetic field H parallel to H growth (i.e., parallel to the spin arrangement of the AFM films, denoted as 0° in Figure ). Ni x Co1‑x O films (with x = 0, 0.2, 0.25, 0.35, and 0.4) were investigated upon negative biasing at −80 V for 10 min (Figure c). These results evidence that the voltage actuation leads to the nonvolatile generation of magnetization ascribed to the partial and permanent reduction of AFM NiCoO to FM NiCo. With increasing Ni content in Ni x Co1‑x O, the magneto-ionically induced saturation magnetization (M S) decreases, consistent with weakened magneto-ionic effects, since Ni hinders voltage-driven oxygen migration. Except for CoO and the ternary film with the highest Ni content, the remaining ternary films display a shift along the applied magnetic field (i.e., an exchange bias shift, H EB), demonstrating the effective coupling between the voltage-induced FM phase and the nontransformed (i.e., remaining) AFM matrix. The absence of a shift in CoO arises from its T N being 290 K, which suppress AFM order at RT. To exclude possible measurement artifacts, the samples were rotated by 180° and remeasured (blue font data in Figure d–h). The observed loop shifts reverse direction, confirming the unidirectional anisotropy induced through FM-AFM coupling. The exchange bias shifts achieved here are comparable to those reported for similar NiCoO-based systems, which are typically realized in Co/NiCoO bilayer structures and require field cooling. The magnitude of the observed exchange bias is consistent with the intrinsically low magnetocrystalline anisotropy of NiCoO and demonstrates that our approach achieves comparable exchange bias using a single NiCoO antiferromagnetic layer, with the ferromagnetic phase generated internally via magneto-ionic actuation, eliminating the need for an additional ferromagnetic layer or thermal treatment. At higher Ni concentrations (i.e., x = 0.4), the magneto-ionic response is almost completely suppressed, resulting in negligible loop shifts. This suppression is attributed to reduced oxygen mobility in Ni-rich environments, which hinders ion migration and prevents the voltage-driven reduction of NiCoO to NiCo. In Figure i, the coercivity (H C) of the films under gating is plotted as a function of Ni content. Unlike CoNi alloys, where increasing Ni content generally leads to a reduction in H C, here coercivity increases with Ni concentration. This further confirms the occurrence of FM-AFM coupling which besides inducing a loop shift, it typically leads to a coercivity enhancement. , Overall, these results demonstrate that exchange bias can be realized without field cooling, by applying a magnetic field during growth and subsequent voltage gating. As shown in Figure S2a,b, a ternary Ni0.35Co0.65O film grown without a magnetic field and subsequently actuated by voltage develops a ferromagnetic phase that is not coupled to the remaining AFM, as evidenced by the absence of a shift in the hysteresis loop, confirming the essential role of H growth in achieving EB by magneto-ionic means.

2.

2

Voltage-driven generation and control of EB in Ni x Co1‑x O (where x = 0.2, 0.25, 0.35 and 0.4) after −80 V for 10 min. (a) Schematic of the liquid-electrolyte-gating process. The zoom highlights the voltage-induced oxygen ion migration and the subsequent formation of NiCo regions within the NiCoO. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of a Ni0.25Co0.75O film after gating at −80 V for 10 min. (c) Room-temperature M-H loops of the series of Ni x Co1‑x O films after being gated at −80 V for 10 min. Panels (d–h) show zoomed loops measured parallel (0°) and antiparallel (180°) to the applied magnetic field used during growth. Solid lines are smoothed curves superimposed on the raw data for clarity. (i) Evolution of EB shift, H EB, and coercivity, H C, as a function of the amount of Ni, x. The lines are guides to the eye.

Additionally, VSM measurements were performed at low temperature along the field-cooling direction on a 50 nm-thick CoO film gated at −80 V for 10 min. The sample was field-cooled from room temperature to 130 K under 10 kOe, and M-H loops were recorded upon heating in 20 K steps up to 290 K. Pronounced exchange-bias shifts (H EB) are observed at low temperature, reaching ≈ −300 Oe at 130 K (Figure S3), together with an increased coercivity reflecting stronger pinning of magneto-ionically generated ferromagnetic Co clusters by the antiferromagnetic CoO matrix. The magnitude of H EB decreases with increasing temperature and vanishes at 290 K, corresponding to the Néel temperature of CoO. Below this temperature, CoO exhibits a significantly larger exchange bias than NiCoO, consistent with the higher antiferromagnetic anisotropy of CoO and the resulting stronger interfacial spin pinning.

For all magneto-ionic films (i.e., Ni x Co1‑x O films with x = 0.2, 0.25, and 0.35), the voltage-induced magnetization remains relatively small, indicating that only a limited amount of NiCo is formed, part of which likely exists in a superparamagnetic state, as suggested by the S-shaped hysteresis loops of the ternary films (Figure ).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization of the cross sections of an as-grown and a voltage-gated Ni0.25Co0.75O film was carried out to investigate the impact of gating on the microstructure. A comparative analysis of Figure a,b (as-grown) vs. Figure d,e (gated at −80 V for 10 min) reveals that voltage actuation results in broadened grain boundaries, particularly in the upper part of the film, where the columnar grains are more well-defined. As shown by the fast Fourier transform (FFT) analyses (Figure c,f) of the blue-marked regions in the high-resolution TEM images of Figure b,e, all diffraction spots in the as-grown film are consistent with NiCoO (Table S1). However, after gating, new diffraction spots emerge, assigned to HCP-Co­(Ni) with an interplanar spacing of 1.88 Å (corresponding to the (101) planes, PDF 00-005-0727) and FCC-Co­(Ni) with a spacing of 1.73 Å (corresponding to the (200) planes, PDF 00-015-0806). This confirms that NiCoO undergoes voltage-driven reduction to metallic NiCo phases (Table S2). Additionally, with the goal of locating the voltage-induced FM regions, a detailed high-resolution TEM characterization was carried out next to the grain boundaries (Figure S4), which are known to act as diffusion channels for ion migration. As seen in Figure S4, metallic regions tend to form discontinuously along the grain boundaries.

3.

3

TEM characterization of the cross-section of an as-grown Ni0.25Co0.75O film and a Ni0.25Co0.75O film actuated with −80 V for 10 min (a,b) Cross-sectional TEM images of an as-grown Ni0.25Co0.75O film acquired in two different regions. (c) FFT of the region marked with a blue square in panel (b). (d,e) Cross-sectional TEM images of a Ni0.25Co0.75O film acquired in two similar regions after applying −80 V for 10 min (f) FFT of the region indicated by a blue square in panel (e). Spots from metallic clusters are highlighted. Tables S1 and S2 show the interplanar distances from the spots of panels (c) and (f), respectively.

Figure shows the results of variable energy positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (VEPALS), used to probe the evolution of structural defects in terms of size and density upon gating −80 V for 2 h. The defect size and density are characterized by the positron lifetime (τ) and relative intensity (I), respectively (see Methods). τ1 and τ2 correspond to vacancy complexes located within the grains and grain boundaries, respectively. For this analysis, a thicker Ni0.2Co0.8O film (200 nm) was grown to achieve suitable depth resolution. As shown in Figure a, variations in defect size and density primarily occur in the upper region of the film, as magneto-ionic activity initiates at the surface and progresses downward. In both as-grown and voltage-gated films, grain boundaries dominate over vacancy clusters, as indicated by the I 2 values exceeding 50%. Remarkably, upon gating, grain boundaries broaden (larger τ2) but decrease in fraction (lower I 2), in agreement with the TEM observations. The average defect size (τav in Figure S5) remains nearly unchanged, as the size of small vacancy clusters (τ1) decreases and their concentration (I 1) rises. However, based on Doppler broadening variable energy positron annihilation spectroscopy (DB-VEPAS) measurements (see Methods), a large increase of the S-parameter, typically scaling with defect concentration, is found for the gated film (see Figure S6a). Such behavior can be only explained by the concomitant change in the local chemistry at the annihilation sites, here to a larger extent at grain boundaries (as seen from τ2 and I 2). Every material has its characteristic S and W fractions, whereas S carries information about defect density and size. Gating induces a shift to lower W-fraction values, consistent with the formation of NiCo-rich configurations at the grain boundaries (Figure S6b). That tendency is significant in the top part of the film, whereas the interface region remains more stoichiometric. This agrees with the broadening of grain boundaries due to voltage-driven oxygen migration, which induces partial reduction of adjacent NiCoO to NiCo, as observed in 50 nm-thick Ni0.2Co0.8O films.

4.

4

Structural defect characterization by VEPALS (a) Positron lifetime components (i.e., τ1 and τ2): and (b) the corresponding relative intensities (i.e., I 1 and I 2) as a function of positron implantation energy (or depth) of as-grown and gated (−80 V for 2 h) 200 nm-thick Ni0.2Co0.8O films. τ1 and τ2 components represent respectively small and large voids. τ2 is the majority defect in the top part of the film. After gating, τ2 increases, consistent with the enlargement of grain boundaries (i.e., ionic channels) in the upper region of the material. Conversely I 2 decreases indicating the number of large voids drops. “V#” stands for the number of vacancies based on DFT calculations for Co3O4.

TEM, VEPALS, and magnetometry (through the characteristic S-shaped hysteresis loops) reveal that voltage induces the formation of small FM regions, preferentially located alongside the grain boundaries in a discontinuous manner. To better understand the microscopic origin of the induced EB, we carried out micromagnetic simulations designed to probe the role of AFM interfacial uncompensated spins (UCSs), known to be crucial for EB, in NiCoO. The model enables EB simulations in polycrystalline systems with vertical exchange interactions and multiple NiCo/NiCoO interfaces (see Methods). In this framework, NiCo (FM) grains are embedded within a continuous NiCoO (AFM) matrix, reproducing the experimental microstructure (3 FM grains out of 255 ≈ 1%, see Methods for the justification). The simulated hysteresis loops were compared with experimental data for Ni0.35Co0.65O, chosen as a representative composition due to its largest EB shift (Figure S7). The modeling was progressively refined by introducing additional degrees of freedom. In the baseline case (Figure S7a), only the FM grains are considered, without AFM UCSs. Because of the small FM fraction, a stochastic thermal field was added to reproduce thermal fluctuations at 300 K, accounting for the superparamagnetic-like response of the FM phase. As expected, without exchange coupling, coercivity and remanence are negligible. When set-type AFM UCSs (pinned spins, see Methods) are included (Figure S7b), EB appears due to interfacial exchange interactions, but coercivity remains essentially unchanged. This shows that set-type UCSs alone cannot explain the experimentally observed coercivity enhancement. In contrast, when both set- and rot-type UCSs (rotatable spins, see Methods) are incorporated (Figure S7c), coercivity increases significantly, and the simulated loop closely resembles experimental results. At this stage, UCSs are assumed to be unaffected by Zeeman and demagnetizing fields, consistent with conventional EB models in layered systems. While EB is reproduced under this assumption, the loop tilt and field-dependent features deviate from experiment. Further refinement (Figure S7d) incorporates the effect of Zeeman and demagnetizing fields into the effective field ( H eff, i ) acting on each UCS. This is motivated by both the large amount of UCSs (3 times the number of FM grains) and their ferromagnetically like behavior (see Methods). This approach yields the best agreement with experimental hysteresis loops, accurately reproducing the EB, coercivity, and loop tilt. The improvement is consistent with the presence of discontinuous FM regions and suggests that UCSs in this system behave in a more active, FM-like manner than typically assumed in EB bilayers, undergoing demagnetizing-like effects, in concordance with the existence of isolated FM counterparts, evidenced by TEM (Figure S4). Overall, these results demonstrate that, in our magneto-ionic films, EB does not primarily stem from the small voltage-induced NiCo fraction. Instead, it is governed by interfacial UCSs, which strongly couple to the FM grains and dictate the macroscopic hysteresis behavior.

To further confirm the coupling between the magneto-ionically generated FM clusters and the remaining AFM matrix, we investigated the magnetic anisotropy of the ternary film exhibiting the largest exchange bias (i.e., Ni0.35Co0.65O) using in plane configuration ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). In these measurements, the applied magnetic field H FMR was oriented either parallel or perpendicular to H growth depending on the sample orientation: 0°, where the resonance field (H FMR) is parallel to the deposition field (H growth in Figure c), and 90°, where it is perpendicular (see Figure S8). A clear anisotropy is observed in our system, as the resonance FMR peak intensity along the easy axis (0°) is stronger and better defined than along the hard axis (90°). The FMR peak allows us to obtain the resonance field for the multiple frequencies. This confirms the presence of unidirectional anisotropy, induced by exchange coupling between the magneto-ionically generated NiCo clusters and the preoriented NiCoO matrix deposited under an applied magnetic field (Figure S8). This is in full agreement with the micromagnetic simulations, which demonstrate that exchange bias and coercivity enhancement originate from the interaction of FM regions with interfacial UCSs. The FMR anisotropy reveals that such coupling is directionally locked to the growth field, supporting the interpretation that UCSs are oriented during deposition and subsequently couple to the voltage-induced FM fraction. Together, the micromagnetic simulations and FMR measurements provide a coherent picture: EB in magneto-ionic films does not primarily arise from the small fraction of NiCo formed, but instead from the dominant role of interfacial UCSs, whose orientation and coupling are governed by the field-assisted sputtering deposition. Additional measurements consistent with the FMR characterization are provided by hysteresis loops recorded with the magnetic field applied parallel (0°) and perpendicular (90°) to the growth-field direction for the Ni0.35Co0.65O film gated at −80 V for 10 min (Figure S8c). When measured along 0°, the loop is shifted and becomes more square-shaped, with larger remanent magnetization and coercivity, indicating that this direction corresponds to the magnetic easy axis established by exchange-bias coupling. In contrast, the loop measured at 90° shows no bias shift and exhibits reduced remanence and coercivity, characteristic of a hard-axis magnetic response.

To explore not only the voltage-controlled generation of exchange bias but also its modulation, a series of Ni0.35Co0.65O films was subjected to varying gating time of 5, 10, and 30 min while applying −80 V (Figure ). The results reveal a clear dependence of EB on the duration of the applied bias. The highest EB, of around 22 Oe, is observed after 5 min of gating. This behavior is attributed to the formation of smaller CoNi clusters, analogous to thinner FM layer in a FM/AFM bilayer system and hence resulting in enlarged exchange bias shift since H EB is inversely proportional to the thickness of the FM counterpart. As the ferromagnetic part becomes thicker, the same interfacial exchange energy is distributed over a larger magnetic moment, reducing the effective bias field. At longer gating times (e.g., 30 min), NiCo clusters grow in size, consequently reducing the exchange bias shift. This leads to a diminished EB effect (Figure e). Furthermore, larger ferromagnetic regions favor domain formation and nonuniform spin rotation, which further weakens the loop shift. Importantly, the EB field is largely reversible in our system, as demonstrated in Figure S2c. Applying −80 V for 10 min induces a clear EB, while reversing the voltage polarity for an additional 5 min nearly suppresses the magnetization, highlighting the voltage-programmable nature of EB in these films.

5.

5

Voltage-driven modulation of the EB in a Ni0.25Co0.75film gated for different times. (a) M-H measurements of Ni0.25Co0.75 films upon applying −80 V for 5, 10, and 30 min (b–d) Zoomed hysteresis loops corresponding to Ni0.25Co0.75 films upon applying −80 V for 5, 10, and 30 min, respectively, measured parallel (0°) and antiparallel (180°) to the applied magnetic field used during growth, H growth. Solid lines are smoothed curves superimposed on the raw data for clarity. (e) Exchange bias shift (H EB) and coercivity (H C) as a function of gating time.

Remarkably, the induced magnetization can be mainly reversed by applying a voltage protocol of opposite sign (Figure S2c), which drives the oxidation of the FM regions.

The onset voltage required to induce magneto-ionic effects in films with lower Ni content (i.e., Ni0.2Co0.8O and Ni0.25Co0.75O) lies between −40 and −60 V for gating times on the order of 10 min. Because the effects observed at −60 V were relatively weak, a voltage-gating amplitude of −80 V was selected to ensure pronounced magneto-ionic effects across all Ni compositions. This choice also enables measurable magneto-ionic response within gating times below 5 min for all films, noting that the magneto-ionic response weakens with increasing Ni content. The dependence of the exchange bias shift on the voltage-gating amplitude is presented in Figure . While the saturation magnetization increases in magnitude with increasing voltage-gating amplitude due to the formation of ferromagnetic NiCo, the exchange bias shift decreases. This behavior is consistent with the growth of the ferromagnetic phase, which leads to a reduction in the exchange bias field.

6.

6

EB programmability through voltage-gating amplitude in Ni0.25Co0.75O films. (a) Time-dependent magnetization measurement under an applied magnetic field of 10 kOe while applying −60 V. (b) Hysteresis loops of Ni0.25Co0.75O films upon being gated at −60, −80, and −100 V for 10 min (c-e) Zoom-in of panel (b) highlighting the coercive-field region for the films gated at −60, −80, and −100 V for 10 min, respectively. Solid lines are smoothed curves superimposed on the raw data for clarity. (f) Exchange bias shift (H EB) as a function of gating voltage.

To validate programmability through cyclability, we performed endurance tests on a Ni0.25Co0.75O film (Figure ) using a sequence of five voltage pulses (−80 V/+80 V, 10 and 15 min, respectively). After the fifth cycle, a final −80 V pulse was applied for 10 min and the voltage was then switched off. Hysteresis loops were subsequently recorded with the applied magnetic field parallel (0°) and antiparallel (180°) to the growth-field direction. As shown in Figure b, the hysteresis loops exhibit opposite shifts, with exchange-bias shifts slightly larger than those obtained after a single −80 V pulse of 10 min (Figure f). The increased shift results from the system not fully recovering its initial state upon cycling, as indicated by the reduced saturation magnetization. This decrease suggests smaller FM clusters, which in turn slightly enhance the exchange bias magnitude. However, since the increase is relatively small, it indicates that the uncompensated AFM spin configuration remains rather unchanged upon cycling.

7.

7

Endurance. (a) Generated saturation magnetization (ΔM S) as a function of time in a 50 nm-thick Ni0.25Co0.75O film during the application of a sequence of five voltage pulses (−80 V/+80 V, with durations of 10 and 15 min, respectively), followed by a final −80 V pulse of 10 min before switching off the voltage. Magnetometry was performed under an applied magnetic field of 10 kOe to ensure full saturation of the magneto-ionically generated ferromagnetic component. (b) Room-temperature magnetization (M) vs. applied magnetic field (H) measurements after the five voltage-cycling steps and following a sixth −80 V pulse, measured parallel (0°) and antiparallel (180°) to the applied magnetic field used during growth, H growth. The inset shows a zoom-in of the coercive-field region.

As mentioned before, voltage-induced EB appears only in films grown under an applied magnetic field. In contrast, samples deposited without a field show no EB, even though they form similar voltage-induced FM NiCo clusters (Figure S2a,b). This highlights the essential role of AFM spin alignment during growth under an applied magnetic field, which effectively replaces the conventional field-cooling process by imprinting a unidirectional anisotropy in the AFM layer at RT. When the AFM film is grown without a magnetic field, multiple AFM domains with no-preferential orientation form, preventing a net coupling with the subsequent voltage-induced FM regions and thus hindering the exchange bias.

It is worth noting that the data shown in the manuscript correspond to one of several independent measurements, all of which exhibit the same qualitative and quantitative trends in coercivity and exchange bias shift as functions of the Ni/Co ratio, gating time, and voltage-gating amplitude. Consistent exchange bias behavior is also observed in the films grown for VEPALS characterization. Since VEPALS requires both sufficiently thick films to ensure representative depth resolution and large sample areas to achieve an adequate signal-to-noise ratio, thicker (200 nm) Ni0.2Co0.8O films were grown and gated at −80 V for longer durations (2 h) to obtain saturation magnetization values comparable to those of thinner films, as increased thickness weakens magneto-ionic effects. These samples exhibit an improved signal-to-noise ratio due to the larger magnetic volume arising from both the increased sample area and film thickness (Figure S9). The increased coercivity relative to the 50 nm films arises from thickness-induced changes in crystallinity, grain size, texture, and surface morphology. In addition, measurements from an independent replica of the 50 nm-thick Ni0.25Co0.75O film show an exchange bias shift of ≈15 Oe (Figure S10), in excellent agreement with the values reported in Figure f.

While the present implementation can be still improved in terms of energy-efficiency, this work should be regarded as a proof-of-principle demonstrating the potential of magneto-ionic control without thermal treatment or Joule heating. The relatively high gate voltages (±80 V) and long gating durations (5–30 min) were intentionally employed to produce clearly detectable magnetic changes. Note that a significant fraction of the applied voltage drops across the dielectric rather than the active magneto-ionic film. Hence, energy efficiency could be substantially improved through optimized electrolyte conductivity; for example, the addition of 10–4 M KI in propylene carbonate has been shown to reduce the required actuation voltage by approximately 1 order of magnitude.

Conclusions

We demonstrate the magneto-ionic generation of EB at RT in 50 nm-thick AFM NiCoO single films, achieved without the conventional requirement of field cooling. By having a magnetic field during film growth, the antiferromagnetic uncompensated spins become preferentially aligned, producing a nearly oriented AFM matrix. This controlled alignment provides the foundation for robust EB effects once the NiCo FM counterpart is formed by magneto-ionic means. Application of a gating voltage partially reduces NiCoO, driving the formation of ferromagnetic NiCo clusters discontinuously along the vertical grain boundaries of the columnar AFM NiCoO matrix. TEM and VEPALS analyses confirm directly and indirectly, respectively, the emergence of these nanoscale FM regions. This electrochemical process is largely reversible, enabling dynamic control over EB within the same AFM layer. Importantly, the EB magnitude can be modulated through three independent parameters. First, increasing the Ni content in Ni x Co1‑x O raises the Néel temperature, thereby strengthening the unidirectional anisotropy and resulting in exchange bias shifts of up to ≈25 Oe. Second, varying the actuation time modulates the size of the voltage-induced ferromagnetic NiCo clusters: longer actuation times promote cluster growth and consequently weaken the exchange bias, reflecting the time-dependent nature of the magneto-ionic process. Third, adjusting the voltage amplitude similarly controls the size of the voltage-induced ferromagnetic NiCo clusters, with larger absolute gating voltages favoring cluster growth and leading to a corresponding reduction in exchange bias. Micromagnetic simulations reveal that EB in this system is governed by the interfacial uncompensated spins of the AFM matrix, which couple strongly to the embedded FM clusters and dominate the macroscopic hysteresis response. This unconventional mechanism highlights that EB arises not merely from FM inclusions but from the active role of interfacial spins in a polycrystalline AFM network. These results constitute a proof-of-principle demonstration of voltage-controlled exchange bias in a magneto-ionically active, single antiferromagnetic layer, representing a realization of exchange bias achieved solely through electrical control and without thermal assistance. Although the present NiCoO system is not optimized for endurance, it establishes a conceptual framework for future material platforms. In this regard, antiferromagnetic oxides and nitrides with higher ion mobility and faster electrochemical kinetics, such as LaFeO3 and CoMnN, are promising candidates. This work thus establishes a paradigm for fully electrically programmable EB, enabling nonvolatile and secure information encoding by leveraging both the intrinsic magnetic anisotropy of the AFM and the reconfigurable nature of the magneto-ionically generated FM regions within the AFM single layer. This approach offers a simple, energy-efficient route toward next-generation AFM spintronic devices.

Methods

Sample Preparation

50 nm nominal thickness of Ni x Co1‑x O films were grown at room-temperature by DC reactive magnetron cosputtering with Ni and Co metallic targets on top of Si (100) substrates, previously coated with Ti (20 nm) and Cu (60 nm) layers that serve as working electrode. An AJA International ATC 2000 V ultrahigh vacuum sputtering system with a base pressure of around 3 × 10–8 Torr and a working pressure of 3 mTorr was used in an Ar and O2 gas mixture atmosphere. The Ar/O2 flow ratio was set at 9% O2 partial pressure to obtain the rock salt CoO rather than the spinel phase Co3O4. The distance between the substrate and targets was 10 cm. A series of samples were prepared by varying the deposition power for Ni to 0, 15, 20, 25, and 30 W, resulting respectively in CoO, Ni0.2Co0.8O, Ni0.25Co0.75O, Ni0.35Co0.65O and Ni0.4Co0.6O. The deposition power of Co was fixed to 50 W. During the deposition of Ni x Co1‑x O films, an external magnetic field (H growth) was applied by placing a NdFeB permanent magnet next to the samples. H growth was estimated by analytically computing the magnetic field H⃗(r⃗) generated by a uniformly magnetized permanent magnet with rectangular-prism geometry in vacuum, within the magnetostatic approximation. The magnetic field outside the magnet was obtained using the standard magnetostatic formulation based on equivalent magnetic surface charge densities located on the faces perpendicular to the magnetization direction. The magnet dimensions were 40 mm × 20 mm × 5 mm along the x, y, and z axes, respectively. A uniform magnetization M⃗=Me⃗z was assumed, with M = 1145.2 emu·cm–3, corresponding to the saturation magnetization of the NdFeB permanent magnet used. The origin of the Cartesian coordinate system was placed at the center of the upper surface of the magnet, along the z axis. The magnetic field was evaluated within the region of interest defined by −5 mm ≤ x ≤ 5 mm, −1 mm ≤ y ≤ 1 mm, and 5 mm ≤ z ≤ 15 mm.

Structural Characterization by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

θ/2θ XRD patterns were acquired using a Malvern-Panalytical X’Pert Pro MRD system with Cu Kα radiation.

TEM was carried out on a Spectra 300 (S)­TEM microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific), operated at 200 kV. Prior to TEM observations, cross-sectional lamellae were prepared by focused ion beam, placed onto a copper transmission electron microscopy grid, and sputter-coated with a protective platinum layer.

Compositional Characterization by Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) Analysis

The composition of the Ni x Co1‑x O films was determined by EDX analysis.

Magneto-Electric Characterization

To explore the magnetic response of Ni x Co1‑x O films under voltage actuation, we used a custom-designed electrolytic cell in capacitor-like configuration, compatible with the vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (Figure a). The measurements were performed along the plane of the films and gate voltages were applied while carrying the magnetic measurements. Room-temperature magnetization loops were recorded under in-plane magnetic fields up to 1 T using a VSM from MicroSense (LOT, Quantum Design). Voltage actuation was achieved by applying a potential difference between the counter electrode (a Pt sheet) and the Cu working electrode using an external power supply (Agilent B2902A). The liquid electrolyte consisted of anhydrous propylene carbonate, a polar aprotic solvent, containing solvated Na+ and trace OH– species (≈30 ppm) to enhance ionic conductivity.

Microsecond-Pulsed Heating Nanocalorimetry

Heat-capacity of the Ni x Co1‑x O films was characterized by microsecond-pulsed heating nanocalorimetry over the temperature range of 230–380 K. A differential setup was employed using a custom-fabricated twin nanocalorimeter in series configuration: one calorimeter served as the reference to subtract background contributions and the other with the film directly deposited on the sensing membrane, without the use of a mask thereby simplifying the fabrication process. This is one of the main advantages of using this system instead of quasi-adiabatic nanocalorimetry. , Measurements were conducted under high vacuum inside a cryogenic environment to minimize heat losses. The heat capacity ΔC P(T S(t)) of the film was extracted from the differential response between the sample (S) and the reference (R) using the following formula

ΔCP(TS(t))=IΔVβS−VRβSβR(dΔV/dt)t(dRS/dTS)t+VRIβS[1−(dRR/dTR)t(dRS/dTS)t] 1

The full derivation of the differential heat capacity can be found in.

To extract the magnetic contribution to the heat capacity, the entropy change (ΔS) is determined from the temperature integral of the heat capacity divided by the temperature (C P/T). This procedure requires subtraction of the phononic (lattice) contribution from the experimental C P(T) data. The lattice contribution is modeled according to the Debye expression for the heat capacity, including a proportionality factor A to account for deviations arising from the specific characteristics of the measured sample

CPph(T)=A(TTD)3∫0TD/Tt4et(et−1)2dt) 2

T D is the Debye temperature, and A is a scaling parameter determined from the best fit to the experimental data. Numerical integration of the Debye function enables accurate estimation of the lattice contribution, which is subsequently subtracted from the total C p(T)­to isolate the magnetic entropy associated with the antiferromagnetic transition.

Micromagnetic Simulations

Micromagnetic simulations were performed on a mesh of 512 × 512 × 10 magnetic cells, each with a volume of 1 × 1 × 5 nm3, to shed light on the origin of exchange bias in Ni x Co1‑x O films. Simulations focus on the exchange bias behavior of the Ni0.35Co0.65O film actuated at −80 V for 10 min since it results in the largest exchange bias shift. Polycrystallinity of the Ni0.35Co0.65O/CoNi system is introduced by using a 2D Voronoi tessellation, which divides the sample into 255 grains (85 per block) with an average radius of 2 nm. Among these, 3 represent the FM buried grains (approximately 1%), 3 are assigned as set-type UCS, and 9 as rot-type UCS. The remaining grains are modeled as a compensated AFM matrix, which does not contribute to the net magnetization. On average, each FM grain interacts with 1 set-UCS and 3 rot-UCS grains. The set-type UCS grains correspond to pinned spins, whose magnetization remains fixed during FM reversal. In contrast, rot-type UCS grains represent rotatable spins that can be reoriented in response to the local effective field. To avoid finite-size effects, the system was repeated 10 times in both x and y directions. Others parameters were fixed throughout the simulations: the uniaxial anisotropy constants K FM = 4.0 × 104 J/m3, K rot = 1.75 × 105 J/m3, K set = 1.4 × 106 J/m3 and exchange coupling constants J set = 9.3 × 10–4 J/m2, J rot = 4 mJ/m2. The superparamagnetic behavior is a result of implementing stochastic thermal field to mimic the thermal fluctuations that occur at a temperature of 300 K. Hysteresis loops are obtained via energy minimization, such that each cell magnetization ( m i ) is parallel to the effective field ( H eff, i ). Each magnetic cell behaves as a spin that interacts with its neighbors via an exchange stiffness set uniformly at A ex = 3 pJ/m for both FM and AFM grains. H eff, i is the sum of different contributions such as anisotropy, demagnetizing and thermal effects. At grain boundaries, no exchange interaction is assumed between FM grains. The only grain interactions considered are the exchange anisotropy between an FM grain and neighboring UCS grains (set or rot), which adds the following terms to H eff

Hex,FM=2Jiμ0δMFM(mFM−mAFM) 3
Hex,AFM=2Jiμ0δMAFM(mAFM−mFM) 4

where μ0 is the vacuum permeability and δ is the spatial range where the exchange interaction acts, which is twice the cell size, along the direction of contact. M FM and M AFM are the FM and AFM saturation magnetizations, respectively which are set as M FM = M AFM = 1.19 MA/m to ensure consistent energy distribution. This value aligns with the expected contributions of Ni (0.45 MA/m) and Co (1.4 MA/m) at the given concentrations of Ni0.35Co0.65O sample. J i represents the exchange coupling constants, i denoting set or rot-type UCS.

Ferromagnetic Resonance (FMR)

Broadband FMR in the microwave range of 2–20 GHz were measured with a coplanar waveguide ferromagnetic resonance (CPW-FMR) spectrometer setup provided by NanOsc Instruments AB. Measurements are performed at a fixed frequency while sweeping the applied magnetic field H FMR.

Variable Energy Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (VEPALS)

Defect characterization was carried out by VEPALS at the Monoenergetic Positron Source (MePS) at Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (Germany). A CeBr3 scintillator detector together with a Hamamatsu R13089-100 photomultiplier tube for the gamma photons detection was employed. A Teledyne SPDevices ADQ14DC-2X digitizer with a 14 bit vertical resolution was used processing the signals. The overall time resolution of the measurement system was ≈0.230 ns and all spectra contained at least 1 × 107 counts. A typical lifetime spectrum N(t) which is the absolute value of the time derivative of the positron decay spectrum, is described by

N(t)=R(t)∑i=1k+1Iiτie−t/τi+Background 5

where k is the number of different defect types contributing to the positron trapping, which are related to k+1 components in the spectra with individual lifetimes τ i and intensities I i with ∑I i = 1. The instrument resolution function R(t) is a sum of two Gaussian functions with distinct intensities and a relative shift both depending on the positron implantation energy, E p. R(t) was determined by measuring a reference sample, i.e. yttria-stabilized zirconia, which exhibits a known single lifetime component of 182 ± 3 ps. The background was negligible, hence assumed as zero in data analysis. All spectra were deconvoluted using a nonlinear least-squares fitting method, minimized by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm in the software package PALSfit, into 2 major lifetime components, which directly evidence localized annihilation at 2 different defect types (sizes; τ1 and τ2). The mean positron implantation depth ⟨z⟩ can be approximated by the simple material density-dependent (ρ) Makhovian function

⟨z⟩[nm]=36ρEp1.62[keV] 6

Doppler Broadening Variable Energy Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy (DB-VEPAS)

DB-VEPAS measurements have been conducted at the slow positron beamline (SPONSOR). Positrons have been accelerated and monoenergetically implanted into samples in the range between E p = 0.05–35 keV, which realizes depth profiling. Implanted positrons lose their kinetic energy due to thermalization and after short diffusion annihilate in delocalized lattice sites or localize in vacancy like defects and their agglomerations emitting at least two anticollinear 511 keV gamma photons after encountering electrons. Since at the annihilation site thermalized positrons have a small momentum compared to electrons a broadening of the 511 keV line is observed mostly due to momentum of electrons. The emitted radiation is measured by high-purity Ge detectors (energy resolution of 1.1 ± 0.1 keV). This broadening is characterized by two distinct parameters S and W defined as a fraction of the annihilation line in the middle (511 ± 1 keV) and outer regions (504–509 keV and 513–518 keV), respectively. The total area below the curve, which is utilized for normalization of both parameters, is 511 ± 16 keV. The S-parameter is a fraction of positrons annihilating with low momentum valence electrons and represents vacancy type defects and their concentration. The W-parameter approximates overlap of positron wave function with high momentum core electrons. Plotting calculated S as a function of positron implantation energy, S(E p), provides depth dependent information, whereas S–W plots are used to examine atomic surrounding of the defect site and its size (type).

Supplementary Material

nn5c19864_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the DOCFAM-PLUS project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 2021 COFUND scheme (Grant Agreement No. 101081337), NICKEFFECT (Grant Agreement No. 101058076), the European Research Council (2021-ERC-Advanced ‘REMINDS’ Grant N° 101054687 and 2024-ERC-Proof of Concept ‘SECURE-FLEXIMAG’ Grant N° 101204328), the Spanish Government (PID2024-156385OB-I00 and PID2023-152783OB-I00), the Generalitat de Catalunya (2021-SGR-00651 and 2021-SGR-00644), and the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 & European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR (grant N° CNS2022-135230) is acknowledged. H.G-T. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the FPI fellowship PRE2021-097883. The authors thank ICTS-SB-CSIC, which is part of the ICTs Micronanofabs node supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICIU). We also gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Horizon Europe program (EIC Pathfinder METASPIN (101098651)). The Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2) is funded by the CERCA program/Generalitat de Catalunya and is supported by the Severo Ochoa Centres of Excellence Programme, Grant CEX2021-001214 S, funded by MCIU/AEI/10.13039.501100011033. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. Authors acknowledge the use of instrumentation as well as the technical advice provided by the Joint Electron Microscopy Center at ALBA (JEMCA) and funding Grant IU16-014206 (METCAM-FIB) to ICN2, with the support of Ministry of Research and University, Generalitat de Catalunya. Parts of this research were carried out at ELBE at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf e. V., a member of the Helmholtz Association. E.M. is a Serra Húnter Fellow.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.5c19864.

  • θ/2θ X-ray diffraction patterns for structural characterization; VSM measurements of gated films grown without applied magnetic field; Low temperature exchange bias in a gated CoO film; Cross-sectional TEM characterization of gated films; Average positron lifetime as a function of depth for as-grown and gated thick films; DB-VEPAS characterization of as-grown and gated films; Micromagnetic simulations of the hysteresis loops of gated films; Magnetic anisotropy of gated films by FMR and angular dependence VSM; VSM measurements of as-grown and gated thick films; VSM measurements of as-grown and gated thin films (additional measurements) (PDF)

E.M. conceived the original idea and led the investigation. E.M., A.L. and J.S. supervised the work. S.P., Z.M., P.S. and A.Q. prepared the samples and carried out the magneto-electrical characterization. H.G-T. and A.L. performed the nanocalorimetry measurements and thermodynamic analysis. S.P., H.T and A.A.L. performed the TEM imaging and analysis. M.O.L., E.H. and A.W. characterized the samples by DB-VEPAS and VEPALS, and analyzed the data. E.M. and T.D. carried out the micromagnetic simulations. S.P., D.G., E.M. and D.R. performed the FMR characterization and the corresponding data analysis. N.D. and C.N. conducted the calculations of the magnetic field generated by the permanent magnet. S.P. and E.M. wrote the manuscript with the contributions of all coauthors.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Nichterwitz M., Honnali S., Kutuzau M., Guo S., Zehner J., Nielsch K., Leistner K.. Advances in magneto-ionic materials and perspectives for their application. APL Mater. 2021;9:030903. doi: 10.1063/5.0042544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guan Y., Han H., Li F., Li G., Parkin S. S.. Ionic Gating for Tuning Electronic and Magnetic Properties. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2023;53:25–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-012219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Quintana A., Menéndez E., Liedke M. O., Butterling M., Wagner A., Sireus V., Torruella P., Estrade S., Peiro F., Dendooven J., Detavernier C.. et al. Voltage-Controlled ON–OFF Ferromagnetism at Room Temperature in a Single Metal Oxide Film. ACS Nano. 2018;12:10291–10300. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. de Rojas J., Quintana A., Lopeandía A., Salguero J., Costa-Krämer J. L., Abad L., Liedke M. O., Butterling M., Wagner A., Henderick L., Dendooven J., Detavernier C., Sort J., Menéndez E.. Boosting Room-Temperature Magneto-Ionics in a Non-Magnetic Oxide Semiconductor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:2003704. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202003704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li H. B., Lu N., Zhang Q., Wang Y., Feng D., Chen T., Yang S., Duan Z., Li Z., Shi Y., Wang W.. et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism through oxygen ion gating. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2156. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02359-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yan Y. N., Zhou X. J., Li F., Cui B., Wang Y. Y., Wang G. Y., Pan F., Song C.. Electrical control of Co/Ni magnetism adjacent to gate oxides with low oxygen ion mobility. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;107:122407. doi: 10.1063/1.4931752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauer U., Yao L., Tan A. J., Agrawal P., Emori S., Tuller H. L., van Dijken S., Beach G. S. D.. Magneto-ionic control of interfacial magnetism. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:174–181. doi: 10.1038/nmat4134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Rojas J., Quintana A., Lopeandía A., Salguero J., Muñiz B., Ibrahim F., Chshiev M., Nicolenco A., Liedke M. O., Butterling M., Wagner A.. et al. Voltage-driven motion of nitrogen ions: a new paradigm for magneto-ionics. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5871. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19758-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tan Z., de Rojas J., Martins S., Lopeandia A., Quintana A., Cialone M., Herrero-Martín J., Meersschaut J., Vantomme A., Costa-Krämer J. L., Sort J., Menéndez E.. Frequency-dependent stimulated and post-stimulated voltage control of magnetism in transition metal nitrides: towards brain-inspired magneto-ionics. Mater. Hor. 2023;10:88–96. doi: 10.1039/D2MH01087A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tan A. J., Huang M., Avci C. O., Büttner F., Mann M., Hu W., Mazzoli C., Wilkins S., Tuller H. L., Beach G. S. D.. Magneto-ionic control of magnetism using a solid-state proton pump. Nat. Mater. 2019;18:35–41. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0211-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Q., Luo X., Wang L., Zhang L., Khalid B., Gong J., Wu H.. Lithium-Ion Battery Cycling for Magnetism Control. Nano Lett. 2016;16:583–587. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vasala S., Jakob A., Wissel K., Waidha A., Alff L., Clemens O.. Reversible tuning of magnetization in ferromagnetic Ruddlesden-Popper-type Manganite by electrochemical fluoride-ion intercalation. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020;6(2):1900974. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201900974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quintana A., Firme A. A., Jensen C. J., Zheng D., Liu C., Zhang X., Liu K.. Hydroxide-based magneto-ionics: electric-field control of a reversible paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic switch in α-Co­(OH)2 films. J. Mater. Chem. 2022;10:17145–17153. doi: 10.1039/D2TC03422K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiba D., Fukami S., Shimamura K., Ishiwata N., Kobayashi K., Ono T.. Electrical control of the ferromagnetic phase transition in cobalt at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:853–856. doi: 10.1038/nmat3130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shimamura K., Chiba D., Ono S., Fukami S., Ishiwata N., Kawaguchi M., Kobayashi K., Ono T.. Electrical control of Curie temperature in cobalt using an ionic liquid film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;100:122402. doi: 10.1063/1.3695160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang Q., Wang L., Zhou Z., Wang L., Zhang Y., Zhao S., Dong G., Cheng Y., Min T., Hu Z., Chen W., Xia K., Liu M.. Ionic liquid gating control of RKKY interaction in FeCoB/Ru/FeCoB and (Pt/Co)2/Ru/(Co/Pt)2 multilayers. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:991. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03356-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Diez L. H., Liu Y., Gilbert D., Belmeguenai M., Vogel J., Pizzini S., Martinez E., Lamperti A., Mohammedi J., Laborieux A., Roussigné Y., Grutter A., Arenholtz E., Quarterman P., Maranville B., Ono S., Hadri M. S. E., Tolley R., Fullerton E., Ravelosona D.. Nonvolatile Ionic Modification of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019;12:034005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Spasojevic I., Ma Z., Barrera A., Celegato F., Magni A., Ruiz-Gómez S., Foerster M., Palau A., Tiberto P., Buchanan K. S., Sort J.. Magneto-ionic vortices: voltage-reconfigurable swirling-spin analog-memory nanomagnets. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:1990. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57321-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ma Z., Arredondo-López A., Wrona J., Herrero-Martín J., Langer J., Berthold O., Pellicer E., Menéndez E., Sort J.. Magneto-Ionic Engineering of Antiferromagnetically RKKY-Coupled Multilayers. Adv. Mater. 2025;37:2415393. doi: 10.1002/adma.202415393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nogués J., Schuller I. K.. Exchange bias. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999;192:203. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilbert D. A., Olamit J., Dumas R. K., Kirby B. J., Grutter A. J., Maranville B. B., Arenholz E., Borchers J. A., Liu K.. Controllable positive exchange bias via redox-driven oxygen migration. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11050. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Murray P. D., Jensen C. J., Quintana A., Zhang J., Zhang X., Grutter A. J., Kirby B. J., Liu K.. Electrically Enhanced Exchange Bias via Solid-State Magneto-ionics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13:38916–38922. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c11126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jensen C. J., Quintana A., Sall M., Diez L. H., Zhang J., Zhang X., Ravelosona D., Liu K.. Ion irradiation and implantation modifications of magneto-ionically induced exchange bias in Gd/NiCoO. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021;540:168479. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168479. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Song J., Chen Y., Chen X., Khan T., Han F., Zhang J., Huang H., Zhang H., Shi W., Qi S., Hu F.. et al. Electric Tuning of Magnetic Anisotropy and Exchange Bias of La0.8Sr0.2CoO3/La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 Bilayer Films. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020;14:024062. doi: 10.1103/physrevapplied.14.024062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou X., Yan Y., Jiang M., Cui B., Pan F., Song C.. Role of Oxygen Ion Migration in the Electrical Control of Magnetism in Pt/Co/Ni/HfO2 Films. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:1633–1639. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10794. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bednarz B., Syskaki M.-A., Pachat R., Prädel L., Wortmann M., Kuschel T., Ono S., Kläui M., Herrera Diez L., Jakob G.. Stabilizing perpendicular magnetic anisotropy with strong exchange bias in PtMn/Co by magneto-ionics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024;124:232403. doi: 10.1063/5.0213731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zehner J., Wolf D., Hasan M. U., Huang M., Bono D., Nielsch K., Leistner K., Beach G. S. D.. Magnetoionic control of perpendicular exchange bias. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021;5:L061401. doi: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.l061401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasan M. U., Kossak A. E., Beach G. S. D.. Large exchange bias enhancement and control of ferromagnetic energy landscape by solid-state hydrogen gating. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:8510. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43955-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jensen C. J., Quintana A., Quarterman P., Grutter A. J., Balakrishnan P. P., Zhang H., Davydov A. V., Zhang X., Liu K.. Nitrogen-Based Magneto-ionic Manipulation of Exchange Bias in CoFe/MnN Heterostructures. ACS Nano. 2023;17:6745–6753. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c12702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Quarterman P., Hallsteinsen I., Dunz M., Meinert M., Arenholz E., Borchers J. A., Grutter A. J.. Effects of field annealing on MnN/CoFeB exchange bias systems. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019;3:064413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.064413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mustafa Z., Jabeen N., Hassan N. U., Jelani M., Muhammad A. Q., Sehar F., Nasir N., Idrees A., Hussain A., Bajaber M. A.. Realization of room temperature exchange bias effect in Co/NiO bilayer via all-solid-state Li-ion redox capacitor. Ceram. Int. 2023;49:2115–2120. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Arredondo-López A., Eiler K., Quintana A., Rius G., Spasojevic I., Salicio A., Nicolenco A., Lekka M., García-Lecina E., Brunin G., Waroquiers D., Rignanese G.-M., Pellicer E., Menéndez E., Sort J.. Composition-Dependent Voltage-Driven OFF-ON Switching of Ferromagnetism in Co–Ni Oxide Microdisks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025;17:9500–9513. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c15739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Baltz V., Manchon A., Tsoi M., Moriyama T., Ono T., Tserkovnyak Y.. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015005. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wolf S. A., Awschalom D. D., Buhrman R. A., Daughton J. M., von Molnár S., Roukes M. L., Chtchelkanova A. Y., Treger D. M.. Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future. Science. 2001;294:1488–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1065389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heinonen O., Singleton E., Karr B., Zheng G., Cho H. S., Chen Y.. Review of the Physics of Magnetoresistive Readers. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2008;44:2465–2471. doi: 10.1109/tmag.2008.2002373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin L. W., Chu Y.-H., Zhan Q., Ramesh R., Han S.-J., Wang S. X., Warusawithana M., Schlom D. G.. Room temperature exchange bias and spin valves based on BiFeO3/SrRuO3/SrTiO3/Si (001) heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;91(17):172513. doi: 10.1063/1.2801695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Molina-Ruiz M., Lopeandia A., Pi F., Givord D., Bourgeois O., Rodríguez-Viejo J.. Evidence of finite-size effect on the Néel temperature in ultrathin layers of CoO nanograins. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;83:140407. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.83.140407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Berkowitz A. E., Hansen M. F., Kodama R. H., Tang Y. J., Hong J. I., Smith D. J.. Establishing Exchange Bias below TN with Polycrystalline Ni0.52 Co0.48O/Co Bilayers. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:134428. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.134428. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mohanta M., Parida S., Sahoo A., Hussain Z., Gupta M., Reddy V., Medicherla V.. Structural and magnetic properties of CoNi surface alloys. Physica B: Condens. Matter. 2019;572:105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.07.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ma Z., Martins S., Tan Z., Chen S., Monteblanco E., Liedke M. O., Butterling M., Attallah A. G., Hirschmann E., Wagner A., Quintana A.. et al. Controlling Magneto-Ionics by Defect Engineering Through Light Ion Implantation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34(34):2312827. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202312827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Makkonen I., Tuomisto F.. Perspective on defect characterization in semiconductors by positron annihilation spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 2024;135:040901. doi: 10.1063/5.0180024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Menéndez E., Silva L., Johann G., Sort J., Dias T.. Unraveling the origin of training in granular Co-CoO exchange bias systems with buried antiferromagnetic constituents. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;478:170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Martins S., Ma Z., Solans-Monfort X., Sodupe M., Rodriguez-Santiago L., Menéndez E., Pellicer E., Sort J.. Enhancing magneto-ionic effects in cobalt oxide films by electrolyte engineering. Nanoscale Horiz. 2022;8(1):118–126. doi: 10.1039/D2NH00340F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nizet P., Chiabrera F., López-Pintó N., Alayo N., Langner P., Valencia S., Fraile Rodríguez A., Baiutti F., Smekhova A., Morata A., Sort J., Tarancón A.. Analog control of La0.5Sr0.5FeO3‑δ electrical properties through oxygen deficiency induced magnetic transition. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2024;11:041426. doi: 10.1063/5.0234003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. López-Pintó N., Jensen C. J., Chen Z., Tan Z., Ma Z., Liedke M. O., Butterling M., Wagner A., Herrero-Martín J., Menéndez E., Nogués J., Liu K., Sort J.. Room-Temperature Solid-State Nitrogen-Based Magneto-Ionics in CoxMn1–xN Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2404487. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202404487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Neto N. F. A., Stegemann C., Affonço L. J., Leite D. M. G., Da Silva J. H. D.. Role of Oxygen Flow Rate on the Structure and Stoichiometry of Cobalt Oxide Films Deposited by Reactive Sputtering. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A. 2022;40:013405. doi: 10.1116/6.0001418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics; 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1998; Chapter 5. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gómez-Torres H., Molina-Ruiz M., Privitera S., Menéndez E., Abad L., Sort J., Bourgeois O., Rodríguez-Viejo J., Lopeandia A.. Microsecond-Pulsed Nanocalorimetry: A Scalable Approach for Ultrasensitive Heat Capacity Measurements. arXiv. 2025:arXiv.2509.18019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.18019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. De Clercq J., Vansteenkiste A., Abes M., Temst K., Van Waeyenberge B.. Modelling exchange bias with MuMax3 . J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016;49:435001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/43/435001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wagner A., Butterling M., Liedke M. O., Potzger K., Krause-Rehberg R.. Positron annihilation lifetime and Doppler broadening spectroscopy at the ELBE facility. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018;1970:040003. doi: 10.1063/1.5040215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hirschmann E., Butterling M., Acosta U. H., Liedke M. O., Attallah A. G., Petring P., Görler M., Krause-Rehberg R., Wagner A.. A new system for real-time data acquisition and pulse parameterization for digital positron annihilation lifetime spectrometers with high repetition rates. J. Instrum. 2021;16(08):P08001. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/08/P08001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Olsen J. V., Kirkegaard P., Pedersen N. J., Eldrup M.. PALSfit: A new program for the evaluation of positron lifetime spectra. Phys. Status Solidi C. 2007;4:4004–4006. doi: 10.1002/pssc.200675868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Dryzek J., Horodek P.. GEANT4 simulation of slow positron beam implantation profiles. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B. 2008;266:4000–4009. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.06.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Anwand W., Brauer G., Butterling M., Kissener H. R., Wagner A.. Design and construction of a slow positron beam for solid and surface investigations. Defect Diff. Forum. 2012;331:25–40. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.331.25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Clement M., De Nijs J. M. M., Balk P., Schut H., Van Veen A.. Analysis of positron beam data by the combined use of the shape-and wing-parameters. J. Appl. Phys. 1996;79(12):9029–9036. doi: 10.1063/1.362635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nn5c19864_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Nano are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES