Skip to main content
The Plant Pathology Journal logoLink to The Plant Pathology Journal
. 2026 Apr 1;42(2):228–233. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2026.0008

Pepper G-type Lectin Receptor-like Kinase, CaRLK1, Modulates ABA-Mediated Stomatal Closure and Drought Tolerance

Jihye Choi 1, Dae Sung Kim 2, Chae Woo Lim 1,*, Sung Chul Lee 1,*
PMCID: PMC13066813  PMID: 41958166

Abstract

Lectin receptor-like kinases (LecRLKs) are plant-specific kinases that play critical roles in stress signaling. G-type LecRLKs, which possess an α-mannose-binding bulb lectin domain, are implicated in diverse stress responses; however, their roles in drought responses in pepper plants remain poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to identify and functionally characterize a pepper G-type LecRLK, CaRLK1. CaRLK1 expression was significantly induced by multiple abiotic stresses, particularly dehydration. Additionally, functional analysis using virus-induced gene silencing revealed that CaRLK1-silenced pepper plants showed reduced drought tolerance and increased leaf water loss, associated with impaired stomatal closure and attenuated leaf temperature increases following abscisic acid (ABA) treatment. Moreover, CaRLK1 silencing reduced the expression of several drought-responsive genes, including CaOSR1, CaDREBLP1, and CaLOX1, under dehydration conditions. Collectively, these findings suggest that CaRLK1 functions as a positive regulator of drought stress responses in pepper plants by modulating ABA-dependent stomatal aperture dynamics and drought-responsive gene expression.

Keywords: abscisic acid, drought, lectin receptor-like kinase


Receptors play a crucial role in plant stress responses by perceiving and transmitting external signals that activate physiological pathways enabling environmental adaptation (Soltabayeva et al., 2022). Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) constitute a large protein family that mediates plant stress responses and hormone signaling (Zhu et al., 2023). RLKs are classified based on their extracellular domains (Shiu and Bleecker, 2001). Lectin receptor-like kinases (LecRLKs) are plant-specific proteins that contain an extracellular lectin domain capable of binding carbohydrates (Liu et al., 2023; Navarro-Gochicoa et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2020; Vaid et al., 2013). LecRLKs consist of an extracellular lectin domain, a transmembrane region, and kinase domains (Navarro-Gochicoa et al., 2003). Based on their lectin domains, LecRLKs are classified into three groups: L-type, G-type, and C-type (Vaid et al., 2012). L-type LecRLKs contain a legume-like lectin domain; G-type LecRLKs possess an α-mannose-binding bulb lectin domain; and C-type LecRLKs have a calcium-dependent lectin domain (Sun et al., 2020). Previous studies show that several G-type LecRLKs are involved in abiotic stress responses. For example, the G-type LecRLK GsSRK enhances salt tolerance in Glycine soja (Sun et al., 2013), while PWL1, a G-type LecRLK in Oryza sativa, positively regulates heat stress (Xu et al., 2023). However, the role of G-type LecRLKs in drought stress remains poorly understood.

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a plant hormone that regulates drought responses primarily by inducing stomatal closure to reduce transpirational water loss (Abhilasha and Roy Choudhury, 2021; Hussain et al., 2018). ABA signaling comprises three main components: pyrabactin resistance 1 (PYR1)/PYR1-like (PYL)/regulatory components of ABA receptors (RCAR), sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2s), and clade A type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs) (Ma et al., 2009; Umezawa et al., 2010). PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors perceive ABA and form complexes with PP2Cs, leading to SnRK2 activation and subsequent phosphorylation of downstream drought-responsive targets, including transcription factors and ion channels (Fujii et al., 2007; Nakashima et al., 2009).

Therefore, this study aimed to identify and functionally characterize the pepper G-type LecRLK, CaRLK1, and to investigate its role in drought tolerance, with particular emphasis on ABA-dependent stomatal regulation and drought-responsive gene expression.

Results and Discussion

Isolation and molecular characterization of CaRLK1

Previous studies show that G-type LecRLKs play important roles in water-deficit stress (Karlik, 2023; Sun et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2024). However, the identification and functional characterization of pepper G-type LecRLKs have not been reported. Thus, this study aims to identify pepper G-type LecRLKs involved in water-deficit stress responses. We identified a pepper G-type LecRLK, designated CaRLK1 (Capsicum annuum G-type lectin receptor-like protein kinase 1), and first characterized its expression before functional analysis.

To determine whether water-deficit stress regulates CaRLK1 expression, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed on six-leaf-stage pepper plants subjected to NaCl (200 mM), mannitol (600 mM), dehydration, or ABA (100 μM; Fig. 1A). Pepper plants were carefully uprooted and treated with NaCl or mannitol, exposed to dehydration, or sprayed with ABA for the indicated time points. First leaf of pepper was sampled for RNA extraction and total RNA was isolated from the first leaf using TRIzol Reagent. For cDNA synthesis, 1 μg of RNA was used with the iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was conducted using gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and iQ SYBR Green Super mix on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). RT-qPCR analysis revealed that, as shown in Figure 1A, CaRLK1 expression was strongly induced in all treatments, with dehydration causing the most rapid and sustained increase that remained high over time. Upon ABA exposure, CaRLK1 expression peaked at 6 h and remained approximately tenfold higher than baseline after 24 h. Under NaCl treatment, CaRLK1 transcript levels rapidly increased at 2 h, decreased, and then showed a second strong induction at 24 h. Mannitol treatment gradually increased CaRLK1 expression until 24 h, followed by a decline.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Expression analysis of the CaRLK1 gene in pepper. (A) Relative transcript levels of CaRLK1 in pepper plants subjected to dehydration, ABA (100 μM), NaCl (200 mM), or mannitol (600 mM). Expression levels were quantified by qRT-PCR using cDNA derived from the first and second leaves. The pepper ACT1 (CaACT1) gene was employed as an internal control. (B) Organ-specific expression of CaRLK1 in pepper. The relative expression of CaRLK1 was normalized to that of CaACT1. Data are presented as means ± standard error from three independent experiments (Student’s t-test; *p < 0.05).

Next, we examined CaRLK1 expression in different pepper organs. Leaves, stems, and roots were collected from plants at the five-leaf stage, whereas flowers were harvested at the ten-leaf stage. As shown in Fig. 1B, CaRLK1 expression was highest in flowers—sixfold higher than in leaves—while stems had relatively low expression and roots displayed expression levels similar to those in leaves. In a previous study, Arabidopsis thaliana G-type LecRLKs were classified into eight clades, and Solanum lycopersicum G-type LecRLKs into 13 clades (Teixeira et al., 2018). Based on this classification, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using G-type LecRLKs from Arabidopsis, tomato, and pepper to determine the phylogenetic positions of pepper G-type LecRLKs (Supplementary Fig. 1). Additionally, we identified nine pepper G-type LecRLK genes sharing over 70% similarity to Arabidopsis G-type LecRLKs and included them in the phylogenetic analysis. G-type LecRLKs from Arabidopsis, tomato, and pepper were clustered into 13 clades. In particular, pepper G-type LecRLKs were distributed among clades 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 13, with CaRLK1 placed in clade 2. The closest Arabidopsis clade member identified in our phylogenetic analysis was AT5G60900; however, no functional studies have reported its involvement in drought stress or ABA signaling.

Decreased tolerance of CaRLK1-silenced pepper plants to drought stress

CaRLK1 expression was highly induced after dehydration treatment (Fig. 1A); therefore, a functional analysis was performed to determine whether this upregulation resulted in phenotypic differences under drought stress. Pepper plants were grown under controlled greenhouse conditions (24°C, 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod, 60% relative humidity) until reaching the five-leaf stage. Because pepper is technically challenging to transform genetically, a virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) system was employed to evaluate the phenotype under drought stress conditions. The Tobacco rattle virus (TRV) vector was used, into which a 300-bp CaRLK1-specific fragment was inserted, as previously described (Bae et al., 2023; Lim et al., 2026; Senthil-Kumar and Mysore, 2014). Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying pTRV1 and pTRV2:CaRLK1 or pTRV2:00 as negative control was co-infiltrated into pepper plants using a needless syringe (OD600 = 0.2). Prior to phenotypic evaluation, VIGS efficiency was verified using a semiquantitative RT-PCR assay (Fig. 2A). The first leaf of five-leaf stage of CaRLK1-silenced and control pepper plants was used for RT-PCR. CaRLK1-silenced pepper plants showed lower expression of CaRLK1 than control plants. Drought tolerance was then evaluated CaRLK1-silenced pepper (TRV2:CaRLK1) and control pepper (TRV2:00) plants at 2 weeks after agroinfiltration. Both plant lines were subjected to dehydration by withholding water for 12 days. After 2 days of re-watering, survival rates were determined based on the number of rehydrated leaves. Under normal growth conditions, no significant differences were observed between TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 pepper plants (Fig. 2B, upper panel). In contrast, after 12 days of dehydration, the leaves of TRV2:CaRLK1 exhibited more severe wilting than those of TRV2:00 (Fig. 2B, middle panel). Furthermore, after re-watering, the survival rate of TRV2:CaRLK1 was nearly twofold lower than that of TRV2:00 (Fig. 2B, lower panel). Plants reduce transpiration water loss through their leaves to enhance drought resistance (Harb et al., 2010; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 2006). Accordingly, the effect of CaRLK1 silencing on leaf water-loss rates was evaluated (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, 2 weeks after infiltration, the first and second leaves were detached, and their fresh weights were recorded at regular intervals at room temperature over an 8-h period. The results showed that TRV2:CaRLK1 pepper plants exhibited a significantly higher rate of leaf water loss. Water loss from leaves occurs primarily through stomata, and ABA regulates stomatal opening and closure (Bharath et al., 2021). Accordingly, stomatal apertures were examined following exogenous ABA treatment. following exogenous ABA treatment (Fig. 2D and 2E). For stomatal aperture measurements, leaf peels obtained from these leaves were floated on a stomatal opening buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM MES–KOH for 3 h. After confirming that stomata were open, the leaf peels were incubated with 20 μM ABA for an additional 3 h. Stomata were observed under a microscope, and 70 stomata were randomly selected for measurement of stomatal width and length using ImageJ software. In the absence of ABA, no significant differences in stomatal aperture size were observed between TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 pepper plants. However, after treatment with 20 μM ABA, TRV2:CaRLK1 exhibited significantly larger stomatal apertures than TRV2:00 (Fig. 2D). Stomatal closure reduces transpiration water loss from leaves, thereby decreasing evaporative cooling and increasing leaf temperature (Lim et al., 2017; Schroeder et al., 2001). Therefore, we measured leaf temperature using a T420 thermal imaging camera as a proxy of stomatal conductance (Fig. 2E). Prior to ABA treatment, no significant differences in leaf temperature were observed between TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 pepper plants, as determined using FLIR Tools+ ver. 5.2 software. Both plant lines were sprayed with 100 μM ABA to examine the effects of exogenous ABA treatment. Conversely, after treatment with 100 μM ABA for 3 h, TRV2:CaRLK1 showed a smaller increase in leaf temperature than TRV2:00, consistent with a more open stomatal phenotype. These results suggest that TRV2:CaRLK1 exhibit reduced stomatal closure, resulting in increased transpiration water loss and lower leaf temperature. Furthermore, the effect of CaRLK1 silencing on the expression of drought-responsive genes was examined (Fig. 2F). Three drought-responsive marker genes—CaOSR1, CaLOX1, and CaDREBLP1—were selected because they are rapidly induced by drought stress and modulate drought response (Hong and Kim, 2005; Lim et al., 2015; Park et al., 2016). At the five-leaf stage, TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 pepper plants were uprooted and subjected to dehydration for 4 h and 8 h. In the absence of dehydration stress, the expression levels of these genes did not differ between them. However, after dehydration treatment, TRV2:CaRLK1 pepper plants exhibited lower expression levels of these genes than TRV2:00 plants. Collectively, these results show that CaRLK1 plays a positive role in the drought response by regulating ABA-mediated stomatal closure and downstream gene expression.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Decreased tolerance of CaRLK1-silenced pepper plants to drought stress. (A) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of CaRLK1 expression in the leaves of control (TRV2:00) and CaRLK1-silenced (TRV2:CaRLK1) pepper plants. CaACT1 was used as an internal control gene. (B) Drought sensitive phenotypes of TRV2:00 and TRV2:CaRLK1 pepper plants. Three-week-old pepper plants were subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 12 days, followed by re-watering for 2 days. Representative images were captured before drought (upper), after drought (middle), and after re-watering (lower). Survival rates were calculated after re-watering. Data are presented as mean ± standard error from three independent experiments. (C) Time-course analysis of transpirational water loss in detached leaves of TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 plants. (D) ABA-induced stomatal closure in TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 plants. Leaf epidermal peels were incubated in SOS buffer containing 0 or 20 μM ABA for 3 h. Representative images (upper) and quantitative measurements of stomatal apertures (lower) are shown. Stomatal apertures were measured from five independent plants, with at least 70 stomata analyzed per plant. (E) Leaf temperature responses to ABA treatment. Representative thermal images were captured 3 h after treatment with 100 μM ABA, and leaf temperatures were quantified from the first and second leaves. (F) Relative expression levels of drought-responsive genes (CaOSR1, CaLOX1, and CaDREBLP1) in TRV2:CaRLK1 and TRV2:00 plants following dehydration treatment. Transcript levels were normalized to CaACT1, and expression in control plants at 0 h was set to 1.0 (Student’s t-test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

Consistent with previous reports in other plant species, CaRLK1 expression is strongly induced by water-deficit stress, and its silencing produces pronounced drought-sensitive phenotypes (Sun et al., 2018, 2020; Vaid et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2022). These findings support the emerging view that G-type LecRLKs function as key regulators of plant responses to dehydration stress. Notably, CaRLK1 silencing reduces drought tolerance, which appears to result from impaired ABA-mediated stomatal closure and decreased expression of drought-responsive genes.

Given that LecRLKs are plasma membrane–localized proteins, CaRLK1 likely functions as a sensor or signaling component that links extracellular drought-related cues to intracellular ABA signaling pathways. Similar regulatory roles are proposed for other G-type LecRLKs involved in abiotic stress responses (Sun et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2023). While the data clearly demonstrate a positive role for CaRLK1 in drought tolerance, the molecular mechanisms underlying CaRLK1-mediated signaling remain unresolved. Identification of CaRLK1-interacting proteins and downstream phosphorylation targets is essential for elucidating how G-type LecRLKs integrate drought signals with ABA signaling networks.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean Government (No. RS-2024-00343006) and the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2024.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at The Plant Pathology Journal website (http://www.ppjonline.org/).

References

  1. Abhilasha A., Roy Choudhury S. Molecular and physiological perspectives of abscisic acid mediated drought adjustment strategies. Plants (Basel) 2021;10:2769. doi: 10.3390/plants10122769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bae Y., Lim C. W., Lee S. C. Pepper stress-associated protein 14 is a substrate of CaSnRK2.6 that positively modulates abscisic acid-dependent osmotic stress responses. Plant J. 2023;113:357–374. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bharath P., Gahir S., Raghavendra A. S. Abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure: an important component of plant defense against abiotic and biotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:615114. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.615114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujii H., Verslues P. E., Zhu J. K. Identification of two protein kinases required for abscisic acid regulation of seed germination, root growth, and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:485–494. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harb A., Krishnan A., Ambavaram M. M., Pereira A. Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1254–1271. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong J. P., Kim W. T. Isolation and functional characterization of the Ca-DREBLP1 gene encoding a dehydration-responsive element binding-factor-like protein 1 in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Pukang) Planta. 2005;220:875–888. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1412-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hussain H. A., Hussain S., Khaliq A., Ashraf U., Anjum S. A., Men S., Wang L. Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:393. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karlik E. Roles of plant receptor-like kinases in response to abiotic stress. Plan. ReceptLike Kinases. 2023:87–119. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lim C. W., Baek W., Lee S. C. The pepper RING-Type E3 ligase CaAIRF1 regulates ABA and drought signaling via CaADIP1 protein phosphatase degradation. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:2323–2339. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim C. W., Cho J., Kim D. S., Lee S. C. Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-mediated gene silencing and overexpression in tomato plants via Agroinfiltration. J. Plant Biol. 2026 doi: 10.1007/s12374-026-09506-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lim C. W., Han S. W., Hwang I. S., Kim D. S., Hwang B. K., Lee S. C. The pepper lipoxygenase CaLOX1 plays a role in osmotic, drought and high salinity stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:930–942. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu L., Liu J., Xu N. Ligand recognition and signal transduction by lectin receptor-like kinases in plant immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1201805. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1201805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma Y., Szostkiewicz I., Korte A., Moes D., Yang Y., Christmann A., Grill E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science. 2009;324:1064–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.1172408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakashima K., Fujita Y., Kanamori N., Katagiri T., Umezawa T., Kidokoro S., Maruyama K., Yoshida T., Ishiyama K., Kobayashi M., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:1345–1363. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Navarro-Gochicoa M. T., Camut S., Timmers A. C., Niebel A., Herve C., Boutet E., Bono J. J., Imberty A., Cullimore J. V. Characterization of four lectin-like receptor kinases expressed in roots of Medicago truncatula. Structure, location, regulation of expression, and potential role in the symbiosis with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:1893–1910. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.027680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Park C., Lim C. W., Lee S. C. The pepper CaOSR1 protein regulates the osmotic stress response via abscisic acid signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:890. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schroeder J. I., Kwak J. M., Allen G. J. Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature. 2001;410:327–330. doi: 10.1038/35066500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Senthil-Kumar M., Mysore K. S. Tobacco rattle virus-based virus-induced gene silencing in Nicotiana benthamiana. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:1549–1562. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shiu S. H., Bleecker A. B. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:10763–10768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181141598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Soltabayeva A., Dauletova N., Serik S., Sandybek M., Omondi J. O., Kurmanbayeva A., Srivastava S. Receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) in response of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plants (Basel) 2022;11:2660. doi: 10.3390/plants11192660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sun M., Qian X., Chen C., Cheng S., Jia B., Zhu Y., Sun X. Ectopic expression of GsSRK in medicago sativa reveals its involvement in plant architecture and salt stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:226. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sun X. L., Yu Q. Y., Tang L. L., Ji W., Bai X., Cai H., Liu X. F., Ding X. D., Zhu Y. M. GsSRK, a G-type lectin S-receptor-like serine/threonine protein kinase, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2013;170:505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun Y., Qiao Z., Muchero W., Chen J. G. Lectin receptor-like kinases: the sensor and mediator at the plant cell surface. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11:596301. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.596301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Teixeira M. A., Rajewski A., He J., Castaneda O. G., Litt A., Kaloshian I. Classification and phylogenetic analyses of the Arabidopsis and tomato G-type lectin receptor kinases. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:239. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4606-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Umezawa T., Nakashima K., Miyakawa T., Kuromori T., Tanokura M., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular basis of the core regulatory network in ABA responses: sensing, signaling and transport. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51:1821–1839. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vaid N., Macovei A., Tuteja N. Knights in action: lectin receptor-like kinases in plant development and stress responses. Mol. Plant. 2013;6:1405–1418. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vaid N., Pandey P. K., Tuteja N. Genome-wide analysis of lectin receptor-like kinase family from Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012;80:365–388. doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9952-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang F., Miao H., Zhang S., Hu X., Chu Y., Yang W., Wang H., Wang J., Shan S., Chen J. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis reveals hub genes regulating response to salt stress in peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24:425. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05145-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu J., Wang C., Wang F., Liu Y., Li M., Wang H., Zheng Y., Zhao K., Ji Z. PWL1, a G-type lectin receptor-like kinase, positively regulates leaf senescence and heat tolerance but negatively regulates resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023;21:2525–2545. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:781–803. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang Y., Labbé J., Muchero W., Yang X., Jawdy S. S., Kennedy M., Johnson J., Sreedasyam A., Schmutz J., Tuskan G. A., Chen J. G. Genome-wide analysis of lectin receptor-like kinases in Populus. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:699. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3026-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Y., Fang Q., Zheng J., Li Z., Li Y., Feng Y., Han Y., Li Y. GmLecRlk, a Lectin Receptor-like Protein Kinase, Contributes to salt stress tolerance by regulating salt-responsive genes in soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1030. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu Q., Feng Y., Xue J., Chen P., Zhang A., Yu Y. Advances in receptor-like protein kinases in balancing plant growth and stress responses. Plants (Basel) 2023;12:427. doi: 10.3390/plants12030427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from The Plant Pathology Journal are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Plant Pathology

RESOURCES