Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Apr 10;21(4):e0345492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345492

Sex- and nationality-based participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon (2019–2025)

Luciano Bernardes Leite 1, Pedro Forte 2,3,4, Marilia Santos Andrade 5, Sasa Duric 6, Pantelis T Nikolaidis 7, Mabliny Thuany 8, Katja Weiss 9, Thomas Rosemann 9, Beat Knechtle 9,10,*
Editor: Ratko Peric11
PMCID: PMC13068233  PMID: 41961830

Abstract

Background

Participation and performance trends are well investigated for the IRONMAN® triathlon. For Xtreme Triathlons (XTri World Tour) races, only one study has examined participation and performance trends for the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ in Norway, but not for other XTri World Tour events. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate participation and performance trends in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ as part of the XTri World Tour.

Methods

Finisher data from all ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ editions (2019–2025) were analyzed. DNS, DNF, missing information, and implausible finishing times were excluded. Participation patterns were described by sex and nationality. Sex differences in race time were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U tests. Differences among the ten most represented nationalities were tested using Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc comparisons. Temporal changes in performance were assessed with quantile regression at the 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 quantiles (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 1,032 finishers were included, of whom 13.5% were women. Switzerland had the highest participation (n = 431). Performance was similar across most nationalities, with slower times observed only among athletes from the United States compared with Switzerland (p = 0.01), Germany (p = 0.02), and Norway (p = 0.03). No sex-based differences were found in any edition (overall p = 0.4922; r = −0.02). Quantile regression revealed clear temporal changes in performance. At the median (0.50), race time increased by 715 s·year ⁻ ¹ (95% CI: 434–997; p < 0.0001), and a similar rise occurred at the 0.75 quantile (β = 727 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 498–955; p < 0.0001). In contrast, the 0.25 quantile showed a smaller and non-significant increase (β = 345 s·year ⁻ ¹; p = 0.0626), indicating that intermediate and slower athletes were primarily responsible for the overall temporal decline. Sex-specific analyses confirmed this pattern: significant increases at the median and 0.75 quantiles for men, and a significant increase only at the median quantile for women.

Conclusions

Swiss athletes formed the largest portion of competitors in ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’, while performance was comparable across most nationalities. Women and men performed similarly throughout all editions. Race times increased across years, particularly among intermediate and slower finishers. These findings provide an updated overview of participation and performance trends in this major XTri World Tour event. Future studies need to investigate more races of the XTri World Tour.

Introduction

The IRONMAN® triathlon is highly popular [1,2] with both age group [3,4] and professional triathletes [5,6] competing in numerous races worldwide to qualify for the IRONMAN® World Championship in IRONMAN® Hawaii [7,8], which is considered one of the ten sport monuments [9].

Among IRONMAN® triathletes, the majority of participants are recreational age group triathletes [3], who spent a higher quantity of time and resources to improve performance outcomes. Recently, the origins of IRONMAN® age group athletes have been thoroughly investigated. Although most successful IRONMAN® age group triathletes originated from the USA, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada [10,11], European IRONMAN® age group triathletes have been the fastest [3,10,11]. In this context, European countries such as Germany, Austria, Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Czechia, Estonia, and Slovenia have the fastest competitors [3,11]. A limitation of these analyses is that they have considered all IRONMAN® age group athletes from a country, but not specific age groups.

In addition to the traditional IRONMAN® races, there are also IRONMAN®-distance triathlons such as the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ [12] where athletes have to face challenging natural environments (swimming in cold water), featuring long distances, steep elevation (cycling and running on hilly courses in the cold), and technical terrain, designed to test both endurance and resilience beyond traditional triathlons [13]. Regarding the origin of athletes competing in the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’, most finishers have been from Norway, and the fastest race times were achieved by Norwegian women and men [14]. Studies assessing performance trends showed that from 2003 to 2015, the number of successful women increased, and women improved their performance and achieved similar performances to men in swimming, cycling and overall race time [12]. It has been noted a sex bias in human performance research of limited information on women indicating the existence of an important research gap [15].

The ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ is part of Xtreme Triathlons series of the XTri World Tour with an increasing high number of different extreme triathlon races held over the world [16]. While we now have some limited knowledge with the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ about one race of the XTri World Tour, we lack information about participation and performance trends in other races of this XTri World Tour, such as the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ held in Switzerland and the ‘CELTMAN! Extreme Scottish Triathlon’ held in Scotland. These races are qualifiers for ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ which is the World Championship of the XTri World Tour.

The aim of the present study was to investigate participation patterns and performance trends in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’, one of the major events of the XTri World Tour. Specifically, we sought to examine (i) nationality-based participation profiles, (ii) sex differences in overall and split-discipline performance, and (iii) how race performance has evolved over the years, including whether temporal changes differ across the distribution of finishing times. Based on previous findings from similar extreme triathlon events such as ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’, we hypothesized that Swiss athletes would be the most numerous competitors and that women would achieve performances comparable to those of men.

Method

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanton St. Gallen, Switzerland, with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent of the participants, as the study involved analysis of publicly available data (EKSG 01/06/2010). The study was conducted in accordance with recognized ethical standards according to the Declaration of Helsinki adopted in 1964 and revised in 2013.

The race

The ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ is a triathlon event covering the IRONMAN® distance (3.86 km swimming, 180.25 km cycling, and 42.195 km running), held across the Swiss cantons of Ticino, Uri, Valais, and Bern. The race has been organized annually in June since 2013. The swim starts in Lake Maggiore (Ticino) in front of the Brissago Islands and covers 3.86 km to Ascona. The 180.25 km cycling segment, with 3,770 meters of elevation gain, goes from Ascona through Bellinzona over the three Alpine passes of Gotthard (2,107 m above sea level), Furka (2,429 m), and Grimsel (2,164 m) to Brienz (Bern). The final marathon run, with 1,990 meters of elevation gain, starts in Brienz and ends at Kleine Scheidegg (2,061 m). The ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’, together with the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ (Norway) and ‘CELTMAN! Extreme Scottish Triathlon’ (Scotland), forms the Xtreme Triathlons series (XTri World Tour) [16]. The first and second place finishers qualify for the XTri World Championships at the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ in Norway. The course records for the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ are 11:23 h:min, set in 2018 by Michał Rajca for men, and 12:39 h:min, set in 2013 by Emma Pooley for women.

Data set and data preparation

Race data from all official ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ events were obtained from the official website [17] and included information on sex, age groups in 5-year intervals, nationality, year of participation, and both split times and overall finishing times (swimming, cycling, running, and transition times). Race data were available for the 2019, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 editions. The 2013–2018 editions and years without available or complete records were excluded due to incomplete or inconsistently reported information regarding key variables such as sex and nationality. In the earlier editions, the official results were presented in non-standardized formats, often as formatted reports rather than structured datasets, which limited reliable extraction of demographic variables. To ensure data consistency and comparability across participants, only editions with standardized and complete records were included in the analysis. Only athletes who officially completed the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ were included. Records corresponding to DNS (did not start), DNF (did not finish), or missing essential information (e.g., missing overall time) were removed. Relay teams were not part of the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ race format and therefore did not appear in the dataset. Data cleaning procedures included the removal of implausible finishing times. As the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ typically takes between 12 and 20 hours to complete, records far outside this range were considered errors and excluded from the dataset. Only a few such cases were identified and removed.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables. Finishing times are presented primarily as medians due to their skewed distribution, while categorical variables (sex, nationality, and year of participation) are summarized as counts and percentages. Differences in performance between women and men were evaluated using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test, accompanied by effect size measures to assess the magnitude of observed differences. Comparisons across nationalities were conducted only for countries with at least 10 race participations. Because group sizes were unbalanced and variances differed, Welch’s ANOVA was applied, followed by Dunnett’s T3 for post-hoc comparisons. Temporal changes in performance were examined using quantile regression, which allows the investigation of how different segments of the performance distribution (faster, median, and slower athletes) change over time. This method was chosen because it provides insights beyond the average trend and is particularly appropriate for endurance sports data, where performance can vary substantially between athletes and across years. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Statistics 30; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Sample characterization

Between 2019 and 2025, a total of 1,032 race participations were recorded in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’, of which 139 (13.5%) were female and 893 (86.5%) were male. Annual entries ranged from 177 in 2024–247 in 2025. Male participation consistently exceeded female participation, with women representing between 12% and 16% of each cohort. Despite variations in total participations across years, the relative proportion of female entries remained stable, highlighting a persistent underrepresentation of women in the event. Fig 1 illustrates the distribution of race participations by sex from 2019 to 2025.

Fig 1. Number of participants per year in ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’.

Fig 1

Switzerland showed the highest number of race participations (n = 431), followed by France (n = 94), Germany (n = 69), and Italy (n = 42). Other European countries such as the United Kingdom (n = 36), Norway (n = 33), Belgium (n = 30), and the Netherlands (n = 29) also had notable representation. Outside Europe, Poland (n = 21) and the United States (n = 21) completed the group of the ten most represented nationalities. Importantly, these values refer to race participations, not unique athletes, as some competitors may have appeared in multiple editions. Fig 2 summarizes the distribution of participations for the top 10 nationalities.

Fig 2. Number of race participations per nationality for the ten most represented countries in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’.

Fig 2

Values represent total race participations across all analyzed editions.

Fig 3 shows the performance values for the ten countries with the largest sample sizes. Welch ANOVA indicated significant differences between groups (Welch’s F (9, 110.53) = 4.00, p = 0.00019). Post-hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s T3 revealed that only the United States differed significantly from other countries, presenting higher mean times and therefore worse performance when compared with Switzerland (p = 0.01), Germany (p = 0.02), and Norway (p = 0.03). No other pairwise differences were statistically significant.

Fig 3. Distribution of finishing times (seconds) for athletes from the ten countries with the largest number of participants in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’.

Fig 3

Violin plots represent the distribution of finishing times for each nationality. Statistical differences were assessed using Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc test. * p < 0.05 vs. SUI; # p < 0.05 vs. GER; † p < 0.05 vs. NOR.

Fig 4 presents the comparison between male and female athletes across all editions analyzed. Across all editions from 2019 to 2025, no significant differences were observed between male and female athletes in total race time. The Mann-Whitney tests were non-significant for every year analyzed, with p-values of 0.6432 (2019), 0.9659 (2022), 0.9595 (2023), 0.3535 (2024), and 0.2256 (2025). Consistently, the effect sizes were trivial in all cases (Rosenthal’s r ranging from −0.00 to −0.08). When all years were combined, the overall comparison also showed no sex-based difference (p = 0.4922; r = −0.02). Median race times were similar across all analyses, and the small magnitude of differences reinforces that both men and women performed comparably throughout the entire period.

Fig 4. Violin plots showing the distribution of total race time (in seconds) for female and male athletes in ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’.

Fig 4

(A) 2019 edition; (B) 2022 edition; (C) 2023 edition; (D) 2024 edition; (E) 2025 edition (F) All years combined. Mann–Whitney test.

Across all athletes (Table 1) and years (2019–2025), quantile regression showed that total race time increased over time, particularly at the median and upper quantiles. At the 0.50 quantile (median athletes), each additional year was associated with an increase of 715 s in overall race time (95% CI: 433.8 to 996.5; p < 0.0001), while similar effects were observed at the 0.75 quantile (slower athletes) (β = 726.8 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 498.3 to 955.4; p < 0.0001). At the 0.25 quantile (faster athletes), the slope was smaller and did not reach statistical significance (β = 344.7 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: –18.2 to 707.5; p = 0.0626), suggesting that performance changes were more evident among intermediate and slower athletes.

Table 1. Quantile regression estimates for race time across years (all athletes).

Quantile β (s/year) 95% CI β (s/year) p Pseudo R²
0.25 344.67 −18.20 to 707.53 0.0626 −0.247
0.50 715.17 433.80 to 996.54 <0.0001 0.025
0.75 726.83 498.30 to 955.37 <0.0001 −0.161

Note. CI = confidence interval; Q = quantile; Pseudo R² based on absolute deviation method.

In male (Table 2), the median quantile showed a significant increase in total race time over the years (β = 675.2 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 366.2 to 984.2; p < 0.0001), with a similar pattern at the 0.75 quantile (β = 825.3 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 579.5 to 1071.2; p < 0.0001). No significant trend was observed at the 0.25 quantile (p = 0.1321).

Table 2. Quantile regression model evaluating temporal trends in male performance.

Quantile β (s/year) 95% CI β (s/year) p Pseudo R²
0.25 300.00 −90.69 to 690.69 0.1321 −0.249
0.50 675.17 366.18 to 984.15 <0.0001 0.023
0.75 825.33 579.50 to 1071.16 <0.0001 −0.167

Note. CI = confidence interval; Q = quantile; Pseudo R² based on absolute deviation method.

In female (Table 3), a significant temporal increase in total race time was observed at the median quantile (β = 841.7 s·year ⁻ ¹; 95% CI: 96.9 to 1586.5; p = 0.0271), whereas trends at the 0.25 and 0.75 quantiles did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0854 and p = 0.5704, respectively).

Table 3. Quantile regression model evaluating temporal trends in female performance.

Quantile β (s/year) 95% CI β (s/year) p Pseudo R²
0.25 700.83 −99.16 to 1500.82 0.0854 −0.202
0.50 841.67 96.86 to 1586.47 0.0271 0.043
0.75 191.83 −476.01 to 859.67 0.5704 −0.197

Note. CI = confidence interval; Q = quantile; Pseudo R² based on absolute deviation method.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to examine participation patterns and performance trends in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’, with particular focus on nationality profiles, sex differences, and how race performance evolved across recent years. The main findings revealed that Swiss athletes were indeed the most numerous, although their performance did not differ meaningfully from that of other European nationalities, with only athletes from the United States showing consistently slower finishing times. Women and men demonstrated remarkably similar race performances across all editions, supporting the notion that sex differences tend to diminish under conditions of extreme endurance. Additionally, race times increased progressively over the years, particularly among intermediate and slower athletes, suggesting that temporal factors, environmental variability, and shifting participant profiles may have influenced overall performance. These findings collectively provide new insight into participation dynamics and performance development within one of the flagship events of the XTri World Tour.

National representation and performance comparisons

The participation in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ was largely dominated by Swiss athletes, followed by competitors from France, Germany, and Italy. This distribution is likely influenced by the location of the event, which naturally favors athletes from European countries—especially Switzerland—due to proximity and easier logistical access. Moreover, the geographical characteristics and higher levels of economic development in these regions may positively influence access to training infrastructure, competition opportunities, and long-term athletic development [18]. The economic dimension is particularly important in this format of triathlon, as elite athletes must invest substantial amounts not only in scientific support, sports equipment, and nutritional aids, but also in extensive travel, often abroad [19].

When analyzing race times among the most represented nationalities, it was observed that, despite small variations in the averages, most countries showed broadly similar performances. The apparent differences were not sufficiently consistent to indicate a clear advantage for any European nation across the editions. The only exception observed was among athletes from the United States, who displayed higher times compared to some of the most present European countries, such as Switzerland, Germany, and Norway. This isolated difference may reflect factors such as lower familiarity with alpine courses, differences in specific preparation, or distinct profiles of athletes who choose to compete internationally in this type of event.

No significant race time differences between women and men

The first and most important finding was that the global comparison of overall race times revealed no statistically significant differences between the sexes, confirming our hypothesis based on findings from the ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ where women achieved a similar performance to men in swimming, cycling and overall race time [12]. It is possible that female triathletes can achieve performances comparable to male triathletes under extreme conditions. For example, women competing in the 2024 Quintuple Ultra Triathlon World Championship in Colmar, France, covering 19 km swimming, 900 km cycling and 211 km running, were able to outperform men in swimming and cycling [20]. The most likely explanation is the elite nature of the World Championship, which featured a highly selected and committed female cohort with a high completion rate. Furthermore, it was the largest and fastest World Championship in Quintuple Iron ultra-triathlon history [20].

It has been suggested that there was sex difference in human performance during competitions characterized by increased demands in strength, speed, power and endurance, where men outperformed women mainly due to the direct and indirect effect of hormones [21]. The male advantage in endurance-related performance has been mostly due to their superior maximal oxygen uptake levels either in absolute or relative to body mass values [22]. On the other hand, these differences might be attenuated by certain advantages of women such as a larger percentage of Type I skeletal muscle fibers and myosin heavy chain I [23].

In addition, physiological, metabolic and strategic factors that favor women in extreme endurance events may also contribute. Women exhibit a higher proportion of type I muscle fibers, greater resistance to muscular fatigue, and more efficient utilization of fatty acids as an energy substrate, which preserves muscle glycogen during prolonged exercise. This results in a smaller relative decline in speed with increasing distance, whereas men tend to show a greater performance decrement in very long events [24]. Furthermore, women often adopt more consistent pacing strategies and experience lower post-exercise muscle damage, contributing to more stable performance in ultra-endurance competitions [25]. In events such as ultra-marathons and long-distance swimming, the sex difference in finish times can be reduced to ⁓1–4%, particularly when the number of male and female participants is similar [26,27]. The American College of Sports Medicine emphasizes that, despite higher absolute VO₂max values in men, the relative limiting mechanisms related to sustained intensity are similar between sexes in long-duration events [27].

Temporal trends in performance

Across the period analyzed, overall race times showed a clear tendency to increase, indicating that athletes took progressively longer to complete the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’. Although year-to-year variation is expected in events of this magnitude, the pattern observed suggests a gradual decline in performance rather than random fluctuations. This trend was most evident among athletes situated in the middle and upper portions of the performance distribution, while those at the fastest end remained relatively stable across editions. Such divergence implies that intermediate and slower participants may have been disproportionately affected by the conditions or demands of the race over time.

Limitations, implications for future research, and practical applications

Due to incomplete race results in earlier years, we could not include all race results since the race began. Several early editions (2013–2018) reported results in non-standardized formats and lacked consistently structured information for key variables such as sex and nationality, which prevented reliable data extraction and comparison across participants. Including more years might have led to different results, with men possibly being faster than women overall. In addition, the analysis relied on publicly available race data that lacked key training-related variables (e.g., altitude gain, endurance background, prior performance) [4,28] as well as environmental characteristics such as competition location, average temperature, humidity, wind, and elevation gain [29,30]. These factors could have provided important context regarding race conditions and performance constraints. Finally, we were unable to control for repeated performances by the same athlete, which may have introduced a small degree of bias. Future studies could analyze race results from the ‘CELTMAN! Extreme Scottish Triathlon’ held in Scotland, where women might also outperform men. For athletes and coaches, our findings suggest that women may have the opportunity to achieve performances comparable to, or in some cases surpassing, those of men in XTri World Tour events. Since women are able to achieve similar or even better performances in triathlons under extreme conditions, some women may wish to consider extreme triathlon events as an alternative to conventional IRONMAN® races, particularly if they are attracted to longer and more demanding courses.

Conclusion

Participation in the ‘Swissman Xtreme Triathlon’ increased over the years, with Swiss athletes forming the largest group of competitors. Performance was similar across most nationalities, except for slower times observed among athletes from the United States. Women and men showed comparable race performances, and overall finishing times gradually increased across editions, especially among intermediate and slower athletes. These findings clarify recent participation patterns and performance developments in this major XTri event. Future studies need to investigate more races of the XTri World Tour.

Supporting information

S1 File. PONE-D-25–65637_Swissman.

(XLSX)

pone.0345492.s001.xlsx (37.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Lepers R. Analysis of Hawaii ironman performances in elite triathletes from 1981 to 2007. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(10):1828–34. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817e91a4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lepers R, Rüst CA, Stapley PJ, Knechtle B. Relative improvements in endurance performance with age: Evidence from 25 years of Hawaii Ironman racing. Age (Dordr). 2013;35(3):953–62. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9392-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Knechtle B, Villiger E, Weiss K, Valero D, Rosemann T, Nikolaidis PT, et al. The fastest nonprofessional age group IRONMAN triathletes in the world originate from Europe. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84008-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gulbin JP, Gaffney PT. Ultraendurance triathlon participation: Typical race preparation of lower level triathletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999;39(1):12–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Knechtle B, Thuany M, Valero D, Villiger E, Nikolaidis PT, Andrade MS, et al. The association of origin and environmental conditions with performance in professional IRONMAN triathletes. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):2700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86033-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mujika I. Case study: Long-term low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet impairs performance and subjective well-being in a world-class vegetarian long-distance triathlete. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019;29(3):339–44. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Puccinelli P, Sacchelli AN, Seffrin A, Knechtle B, Weiss K, Andrade MS. Origin and age group of the fastest amateur triathletes competing in “Ironman Hawaii” between 2003 and 2019. Sports Med Health Sci. 2023;6(1):70–5. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2023.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Knechtle B, Cuk I, Villiger E, Forte P, Thuany M, Andrade MS, et al. Performance and pacing of professional IRONMAN triathletes: the fastest IRONMAN World Championship ever-IRONMAN Hawaii 2022. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42800-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Desgorces F-D, Berthelot G, El Helou N, Thibault V, Guillaume M, Tafflet M, et al. From Oxford to Hawaii ecophysiological barriers limit human progression in ten sport monuments. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Knechtle B, Valero D, Villiger E, Thuany M, Nikolaidis PT, Cuk I, et al. The influence of origin and race location on performance in IRONMAN® age group triathletes. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0315064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Knechtle B, Thuany M, Valero D, Villiger E, Nikolaidis PT, Cuk I, et al. Europe has the fastest Ironman race courses and the fastest Ironman age group triathletes. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):20903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71866-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, Stiefel M, Rosemann T, Rüst CA. Performance and sex differences in “Isklar Norseman Xtreme Triathlon”. Chin J Physiol. 2016;59(5):276–83. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2016.BAE420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.13 Norseman Xtreme Triathlon. https://nxtri.com/. Accessed 2025 December 9.
  • 14.Rüst CA, Bragazzi NL, Signori A, Stiefel M, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Nation related participation and performance trends in ‘Norseman Xtreme Triathlon’ from 2006 to 2014. Springerplus. 2015;4:469. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1255-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hunter SK, Senefeld JW. Sex differences in human performance. J Physiol. 2024;602(17):4129–56. doi: 10.1113/JP284198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.16XTri World Tour. https://www.xtriworldtour.com/. Accessed 2025 December 9.
  • 17.17Swissman Xtreme Triathlon. https://suixtri.com/finishers/. Accessed 2025 December 9.
  • 18.Kasović M, Skrinjaric B, Štefan L. Macro and meso indicators of success pertaining to European countries in elite triathlon. Sport Science. 2020;13:49–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wunderlich AC, Follert F, Daumann F. Specialization in sports: A theoretical approach. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Knechtle B, Leite LB, Duric S, Cuk I, Andrade MS, Scheer V, et al. Sex differences in performance and pacing in the greatest Quintuple Iron ultra-triathlon race in history: The IUTA World Championship 2024 in France. PLoS One. 2025;20(9):e0331563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joyner MJ, Hunter SK, Senefeld JW. Evidence on sex differences in sports performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025;138(1):274–81. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00615.2024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santisteban KJ, Lovering AT, Halliwill JR, Minson CT. Sex Differences in VO2max and the impact on endurance-exercise performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):4946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nuzzo JL. Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta-analysis. Clin Anat. 2024;37(1):81–91. doi: 10.1002/ca.24091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Le Mat F, Géry M, Besson T, Ferdynus C, Bouscaren N, Millet GY. Running endurance in women compared to men: Retrospective analysis of matched real-world big data. Sports Med. 2023;53(4):917–26. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01813-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sandbakk Ø, Solli GS, Holmberg H-C. Sex differences in world-record performance: The influence of sport discipline and competition duration. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(1):2–8. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tiller NB, Elliott-Sale KJ, Knechtle B, Wilson PB, Roberts JD, Millet GY. Do sex differences in physiology confer a female advantage in ultra-endurance sport?. Sports Med. 2021;51(5):895–915. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01417-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tiller N, Illidi C. Sex differences in ultramarathon performance in races with comparable numbers of males and females. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024;49(8):1129–36. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2024-0051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.O’Toole ML. Training for ultraendurance triathlons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;21(5 Suppl):S209-13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao J, Wu Y, Zhang J. A study of triathletes’ race strategies in different competition environments. Heliyon. 2024;10(8):e29454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saycell J, Lomax M, Massey H, Tipton M. Scientific rationale for changing lower water temperature limits for triathlon racing to 12°C with wetsuits and 16°C without wetsuits. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(11):702–8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ratko Peric

5 Mar 2026

Sex- and nationality-based participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon (2019–2025)

PONE-D-25-65637

Dear Dr. Knechtle,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support....

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ratko Peric, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal requirements:-->--> -->-->1. Thank you for uploading your study's underlying data set. Unfortunately, the repository you have noted in your Data Availability statement does not qualify as an acceptable data repository according to PLOS's standards.-->--> -->-->At this time, please upload the minimal data set necessary to replicate your study's findings to a stable, public repository (such as figshare or Dryad) and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. For a list of recommended repositories and additional information on PLOS standards for data deposition, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.-->--> -->-->2. In the online submission form, you indicated that “The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”-->-->All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either a. In a public repository, b. Within the manuscript itself, or c. Uploaded as supplementary information.-->-->This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval.-->--> -->-->3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.-->--> -->-->4. We note that there is identifying data in the Supporting Information file. Due to the inclusion of these potentially identifying data, we have removed this file from your file inventory. Prior to sharing human research participant data, authors should consult with an ethics committee to ensure data are shared in accordance with participant consent and all applicable local laws.-->--> -->-->Data sharing should never compromise participant privacy. It is therefore not appropriate to publicly share personally identifiable data on human research participants. The following are examples of data that should not be shared:-->--> -->-->-Name, initials, physical address-->-->-Ages more specific than whole numbers-->-->-Internet protocol (IP) address-->-->-Specific dates (birth dates, death dates, examination dates, etc.)-->-->-Contact information such as phone number or email address-->-->-Location data-->-->-ID numbers that seem specific (long numbers, include initials, titled “Hospital ID”) rather than random (small numbers in numerical order)-->--> -->-->Data that are not directly identifying may also be inappropriate to share, as in combination they can become identifying. For example, data collected from a small group of participants, vulnerable populations, or private groups should not be shared if they involve indirect identifiers (such as sex, ethnicity, location, etc.) that may risk the identification of study participants.-->--> -->-->Additional guidance on preparing raw data for publication can be found in our Data Policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data) and in the following article: http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long.-->--> -->-->Please remove or anonymize all personal information (<specific identifying information in file to be removed>), ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set. Please note that spreadsheet columns with personal information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.-->

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: This manuscript presents a clear, methodologically sound, and timely analysis of participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon as part of the XTri World Tour. The study addresses a relevant gap in the literature, as evidence on Xtreme Triathlons beyond the Norseman event remains scarce.This manuscript presents a clear, methodologically sound, and timely analysis of participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon as part of the XTri World Tour. The study addresses a relevant gap in the literature, as evidence on Xtreme Triathlons beyond the Norseman event remains scarce.This manuscript presents a clear, methodologically sound, and timely analysis of participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon as part of the XTri World Tour. The study addresses a relevant gap in the literature, as evidence on Xtreme Triathlons beyond the Norseman event remains scarce.This manuscript presents a clear, methodologically sound, and timely analysis of participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon as part of the XTri World Tour. The study addresses a relevant gap in the literature, as evidence on Xtreme Triathlons beyond the Norseman event remains scarce.

The dataset is comprehensive, covering all editions of the event from 2019 to 2025, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria are appropriate and transparently described. The statistical approach is rigorous and well suited to the research questions. In particular, the use of quantile regression provides valuable insight into temporal performance changes across different performance levels, going beyond mean-based analyses and strengthening the interpretation of trends over time.

The results are clearly presented and logically interpreted. The conclusions are fully supported by the data and are appropriately framed without overgeneralization. The finding that performance declines are driven mainly by intermediate and slower finishers, while elite performance remains relatively stable, is especially informative and relevant for understanding participation dynamics in extreme endurance events.

The manuscript is well written, intelligible, and structured in accordance with journal standards. Data availability is adequate and consistent with PLOS ONE policies.

Overall, this is a solid and well-executed contribution to the literature on endurance sports and Xtreme Triathlon events. I have no major or minor concerns and recommend the manuscript for acceptance as submitted.

Reviewer #2: I would like to congratulate the authors on a well-prepared and clearly written manuscript. The study is methodologically sound, clearly presented, and addresses an interesting and relevant research question. I also appreciate the transparent use of publicly available data and the appropriate application of statistical methods. Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field, and I would like to thank the authors for their thorough and high-quality work.I would like to congratulate the authors on a well-prepared and clearly written manuscript. The study is methodologically sound, clearly presented, and addresses an interesting and relevant research question. I also appreciate the transparent use of publicly available data and the appropriate application of statistical methods. Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field, and I would like to thank the authors for their thorough and high-quality work.I would like to congratulate the authors on a well-prepared and clearly written manuscript. The study is methodologically sound, clearly presented, and addresses an interesting and relevant research question. I also appreciate the transparent use of publicly available data and the appropriate application of statistical methods. Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field, and I would like to thank the authors for their thorough and high-quality work.I would like to congratulate the authors on a well-prepared and clearly written manuscript. The study is methodologically sound, clearly presented, and addresses an interesting and relevant research question. I also appreciate the transparent use of publicly available data and the appropriate application of statistical methods. Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field, and I would like to thank the authors for their thorough and high-quality work.

Overall, I believe that the manuscript is well prepared, and I have no comments or suggestions for revision.

Reviewer #3: Manuscript Number: PONE-D-25-65637 Manuscript Number: PONE-D-25-65637 Manuscript Number: PONE-D-25-65637 Manuscript Number: PONE-D-25-65637

Manuscript Title: Sex- and nationality-based participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon (2019–2025)

This manuscript examines participation and performance trends in the Swissman Xtreme Triathlon between 2019 and 2025. It focuses particularly on differences based on sex and nationality, as well as temporal changes in race performance. This topic is highly relevant given the scarcity of research on participation and performance trends in XTri World Tour events, with prior studies being limited to the Norseman Xtreme Triathlon in Norway. The present study therefore fills an important gap by providing updated insights from one of the XTri World Tour's major races.

The manuscript is well written and logically structured, and the statistical methods used are appropriate. The results are clearly presented and largely support the authors’ conclusions. Overall, this study is a valuable addition to the literature on extreme endurance sports.

I just have a few minor comments to make.

- Overall, the different sections of the manuscript are well written.

- Some of the sentences in the introduction and discussion sections are lengthy and could be simplified for clarity.

- Consider standardising the terminology relating to 'Xtreme Triathlon', 'XTri World Tour' and 'Xtreme Triathlon Series'.

- In the Methods section, it would be helpful to briefly explain why the 2013–2018 editions were excluded, as well as mentioning any potential biases that this exclusion may have caused.

- You could add a few recent studies on ultra-endurance or extreme triathlons to better place these findings in context, which would provide a more comprehensive overview of the subject.

- The figures and tables are generally clear. However, adding short explanatory captions to some of the figures (e.g. Figures 2 and 3) would help readers to interpret the data more quickly.

Reviewer #4: Nice pieece of information and good selection of the topic. Please continue publishing these kind of information which adds to scientific community extra value. Probably with additional competitions and from different countries participants information will be more robust Nice pieece of information and good selection of the topic. Please continue publishing these kind of information which adds to scientific community extra value. Probably with additional competitions and from different countries participants information will be more robust Nice pieece of information and good selection of the topic. Please continue publishing these kind of information which adds to scientific community extra value. Probably with additional competitions and from different countries participants information will be more robust Nice pieece of information and good selection of the topic. Please continue publishing these kind of information which adds to scientific community extra value. Probably with additional competitions and from different countries participants information will be more robust

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy..-->

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof. Robert Gajda, MD, PhD, DScProf. Robert Gajda, MD, PhD, DScProf. Robert Gajda, MD, PhD, DScProf. Robert Gajda, MD, PhD, DSc

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Nejmeddine OuerghiNejmeddine OuerghiNejmeddine OuerghiNejmeddine Ouerghi

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Ratko Peric

PONE-D-25-65637

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Knechtle,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ratko Peric

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. PONE-D-25–65637_Swissman.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0345492.s001.xlsx (37.7KB, xlsx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES