Skip to main content
The British Journal of Radiology logoLink to The British Journal of Radiology
. 2025 Jul 24;99(1180):642–655. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqaf176

Rare and uncommon tumours of the female pelvis: what the radiologist should know

Silvia Bottazzi 1,2,, Luca Russo 3,4, Veronica Celli 5, Anna Rame 6, Alessandra Iacono 7, Guido Imbemba 8, Evis Sala 9,10, Benedetta Gui 11
PMCID: PMC13070656  PMID: 40704674

Abstract

Gynaecological tumours present a broad spectrum of histological subtypes due to the diverse anatomical and tissue origin of the reproductive organs. Rare tumours affect less than 6 per 100 000 individuals annually, posing significant challenges in diagnosis and management due to limited clinical awareness. Indeed, treatment protocols rely on options developed for more common histotypes, which may have limited efficacy on these rare tumours. In recent years, collaborative international efforts have started to address these gaps, improving standards of care. A comprehensive understanding of rare tumours’ clinical and imaging features is necessary for radiologists in order to provide clinicians with useful information for treatment planning. In this review, we adopted an organ-based outline, describing rare tumours of the uterine corpus (leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, carcinosarcoma), cervix (gastric-type adenocarcinoma), and ovary (cystadenofibroma, lipid-poor teratoma, struma ovarii, immature teratoma, dysgerminoma). Additionally, tumours occurring at multiple sites, including lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumours, aggressive angiomyxoma and metastases are discussed. The objective is to help radiologists become familiar with these uncommon entities, ultimately increasing awareness on this topic.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, female genital neoplasms, rare tumours

Introduction

Gynaecological tumours can arise from any structure within the genital tract. The genital tract’s anatomical complexity, with its multiple organs and diverse tissue types, predisposes for a wide variety of potential tumour subtypes. However, many of these histological subtypes are exceedingly rare, and most radiologists may never encounter them in their careers.1–3

Rare tumours affect less than 6 per 100 000 individuals a year and pose significant diagnostic and management challenges due to limited awareness of their imaging characteristics, clinical behaviour, and optimal treatment approaches, as these patients are not routinely involved in clinical trials.4–6

Consequently, patients with rare tumours are frequently misdiagnosed or mistreated due to the absence of specific guidelines, with management defaulting to strategies designed for more common histological subtypes.6 Additionally, evolving tumour classifications add complexity to understanding these diseases, eventually confusing clinicians and radiologists.2,7,8

Encouragingly, increased interest in this topic has led to several international collaborations aimed at filling the existing gaps and, consequently, improving the quality of care for these patients.9–12

In many cases, rare tumours are diagnosed through biopsy. Therefore, radiologists must understand the tumour’s behaviour, aggressiveness, and patterns of spread rather than solely focusing on lesion characterisation.

This review aims to explore the typical radiological features and behaviour of uncommon gynaecological tumours to help radiologists assess these entities, emphasising what is clinically relevant for patient management. Although we primarily focused on malignant tumours, we also included certain benign lesions that often mimic malignancy and may lead to misdiagnosis and overtreatment—such as cystadenofibroma, lipid-poor teratoma, and struma ovarii—or present considerable diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties due to their local invasiveness, as in the case of aggressive angiomyxoma.

Uterine body tumours

Rare uterine body tumours are predominantly of mesenchymal origin. The most common type is uterine sarcoma, accounting for 3%-9% of uterine neoplasms. Uterine sarcomas most commonly arise from the outer myometrium, as in leiomyosarcomas; however, they may occasionally develop from the sparse mesenchymal cells within the endometrial layer, such as in endometrial stromal sarcomas.8,13

In contrast, carcinosarcomas are mixed tumours containing both mesenchymal and epithelial components. They have been recently reclassified as a rare and aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer, reflecting their primarily epithelial origin.7

Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is the most common uterine sarcoma, accounting for 41%-60% of cases, followed by endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma.14–16 The median age at diagnosis is 60 years; thus, a rapidly growing mass in a postmenopausal woman not on hormonal treatment should raise the suspicion of a LMS.15,17,18 Of note, only 0.2% of LMS arise from a preexisting leiomyoma.19,20 Nodal and peritoneal involvement are common, with metastases to the lungs, peritoneum, or upper abdomen present in up to 33% of cases at diagnosis.15,20 MRI demonstrated high accuracy (97.6%) in distinguishing LMS from leiomyomas.14 In recent years, different scoring systems have been proposed based on size, borders, and MRI-signal characteristics to aid the differential diagnosis. On MRI, LMS typically appear as large, irregular lesions, showing intermediate-to-high signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted imaging (WI). They often exhibit heterogeneous contrast enhancement due to haemorrhage and necrosis.15–17,20 Quantification of necrotic areas, which are generally ≤20% in leiomyomas compared with LMS, may improve diagnostic specificity.17 Also, diffusion restriction with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) SI equal to or higher than that of the endometrium (or lymph nodes) suggests LMS (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Leiomyosarcoma. MR images show a large, irregular lesion with high SI on T2-WI (A, D), with areas of viable tissue (asterisk) demonstrating higher SI on DWI (B) compared with the endometrium (E) and corresponding low SI on ADC map (C). Heterogeneous appearance on T1-WI (E) and postcontrast images (F) is due to the presence of haemorrhage (arrow) and necrosis (arrowhead). Abbreviations: SI = signal intensity; WI = weighted imaging.

Quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values is recommended, with proposed cut-offs ranging from 0.79 to 1.23 × 10³ mm2/s. An ADC of 0.905 × 10³ mm2/s or lower indicates malignancy.15,20,21 To ensure accuracy, ADC values should be measured in viable tissue, avoiding haemorrhagic regions which can exhibit low ADC values.15

Endometrial stromal sarcoma

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), a subset of endometrial stromal tumours, is classified as low-grade or high-grade.22 ESS typically affects younger women compared with endometrial carcinoma, particularly in cases of low-grade ESS.20,23

On MRI, ESS appears as a large, endometrial-based lesion with significant myometrial involvement.24 A distinguishing feature is the presence of hypointense bands on T2-WI, representing preserved myometrium within areas of myometrial involvement. These bands create a “worm-like appearance” that aids differentiation from leiomyomas.24–27 The lesion may also contain cystic areas.24

ESS typically shows heterogeneous enhancement on MRI, sometimes with a feather-like pattern, appearing iso- or hyperintense relative to normal myometrium.27,28 Typical findings include intramyometrial nodules, intravascular extension, and continuous spread to surrounding structures via the fallopian tube or uterine ligaments19,24,27,29 (Figure 2). However, MRI is primarily used for staging after an endometrial biopsy rather than preoperative diagnosis.26 High-grade ESS demonstrates more aggressive and destructive behaviour compared with low-grade ESS.23

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Sagittal (A) and axial T2-WI (B-D) show the typical appearance of a high-grade ESS with hypointense bands of preserved myometrium within areas of myometrial involvement (arrowheads). The tumour extends through the right fallopian tube (arrow) into the pelvic peritoneum (D). The aggressive nature of the tumour is demonstrated by the diffuse peritoneal involvement seen on CT (asterisks in E). Abbreviations: ESS = endometrial stromal sarcoma; WI = weighted imaging.

Carcinosarcoma

Carcinosarcoma, formerly known as malignant mixed Mullerian tumour, is the rarest subtype of endometrial cancer and an extremely uncommon occurrence in the cervix.30 Once classified as a uterine sarcoma, it represents less than 1% of uterine malignancies but accounts for approximately 15% of related deaths due to its aggressive nature.15,31,32 It exhibits a high propensity for lymphatic spread, peritoneal dissemination, and distant metastases, with nodal involvement at diagnosis in up to 35% of cases and metastatic disease in over 10%.32 On MRI, carcinosarcomas typically appear as large solid masses within the endometrial cavity, often extending through the cervical os, with frequent myometrial or cervical invasion. They demonstrate inhomogeneously hyperintense SI on T2-WI due to haemorrhage and necrosis.19,23 Persistent, progressive enhancement may help distinguish them from other subtype of endometrial cancer26,30 (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Endometrial carcinosarcoma. MR images show a large endometrial-based lesion extending through the internal os, demonstrating heterogeneous appearance on T2-WI (A, E) and T1-WI (B) due to the presence of haemorrhagic areas (arrow), and marked impeded diffusion (C, D). Arterial (F), venous (G), and delayed (H) postcontrast images show progressive and persistent enhancement (asterisk).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Cervical carcinosarcoma. MRI shows a large lesion replacing the normal uterine anatomy, with heterogeneous appearance on T2-WI (A, D, E) and marked impeded diffusion (B, C). There is also evidence of nodal (arrow in D) and peritoneal metastases (asterisks in E and F), reflecting the aggressive nature of carcinosarcoma.

Cervical tumours

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common neoplasm in women.33 Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounts for 80% of cases and is generally associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Conversely, adenocarcinomas (AC) are a more heterogeneous group, accounting for approximately 10%-20% of cervical cancer cases.34 The classification of AC has been recently revised, dividing AC into 2 main groups based on morphology and HPV association.2 HPV-associated AC represents approximately 85% of AC, with usual-type and mucinous-type AC being the most frequent subtype, while gastric-type AC is the main subtype of HPV-independent AC.34,35

Gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix

Gastric-type AC represents approximately 90% of HPV-independent AC, making up to 10% of all AC cases. Of note, the incidence of gastric-type AC is higher in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.34,36,37 Patients may present with watery vaginal discharge or abnormal bleeding.36 This subtype includes tumours with variable grades of differentiation and is also known as adenoma malignum, a well-differentiated form, or minimal deviation adenocarcinoma.2

Gastric-type AC typically arises in the upper third of the cervical canal but frequently extends to involve the entire cervix at diagnosis due to its aggressive nature. Unlike SCC, which typically presents as a mass-forming, solid lesion that replaces normal cervical tissue, gastric-type AC has a more insidious presentation, making it diagnostically challenging for radiologists. MRI features of gastric-type AC include infiltrative, endophytic growth centred within the cervical stroma, which often results in underestimation of the disease extent and a characteristic solid-cystic morphology with small cysts embedded within the solid component. When the solid component is small, diffusion restriction on DWI images may be minimal.35,36,38,39 In these cases, postcontrast T1-WI may help identifying the solid component.36

Histologic diagnosis can be challenging as deeply located tumour glands necessitate deep biopsies, and well-differentiated forms of gastric-type AC exhibit cytologic features that overlap with benign conditions on smear tests.40,41

These tumours often present at advanced stages and are associated with a higher incidence of local and distant metastases. The peritoneum and the adnexa are common sites of disease, with ovarian metastases found in up to 25% of cases. Hence, careful assessment of surrounding structures is required42,43 (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Gastric-type adenocarcinoma. Sagittal T2-WI (A) shows a subtle solid-cystic lesion with ill-defined margins and endophytic growth in the cervical stroma. This infiltrative pattern is typical of the gastric-type adenocarcinoma. Mild-to-moderate impeded diffusion is noted (B, C), leading to underestimation of the disease extent (arrow). Ovarian (curved arrow) and peritoneal (asterisk) involvement can also be noted (D, E). Conversely, SCC presents as a sharply demarcated mass-forming solid lesion on T2-WI (F). Abbreviations: SCC = squamous cell carcinoma.

It can be challenging to differentiate gastric-type AC from other cystic cervical lesions, such as lobular glandular hyperplasia, Nabothian cysts, and cervical polyps. Unlike the subtle, infiltrative growth characteristic of gastric-type AC, benign lesions generally present with well-defined margins. Additionally, Nabothian cysts lack a solid component and are more superficially located, while cervical polyps demonstrate exophytic growth patterns, distinctly contrasting with the infiltrative behaviour of gastric-type AC.35,36

Ovarian tumours

Most ovarian tumour subtypes are rare, and differential diagnosis on MRI can be challenging. Thus, MRI images should always be integrated with the patient’s age, clinical history and serum markers.44 In the following paragraphs, we will focus on those presenting specific features that can help the radiologist in their recognition. Some of these entities, such as cystadenofibroma and lipid poor teratoma, although predominantly benign, can mimic malignant epithelial tumours. However, they present with distinctive imaging characteristics that enable correct identification.

Cystadenofibroma

Ovarian cystadenofibroma accounts for 1.7% of ovarian tumours and is classified as benign, borderline, or malignant based on the degree of epithelial proliferation, with the malignant form being extremely rare.45,46 For radiologists, it is crucial to recognise the cystadenofibroma MRI features, as it is a frequent mimicker of borderline and malignant lesions.47,48

On MRI, cystadenofibromas typically appear as uni- or multilocular lesions with smooth margins and a variable solid component. Typical findings include thickened septa and irregular borders, with mural nodules and papillary projections in up to 33% of cases.45,49 A key distinguishing feature is the solid component’s marked low-SI on T2-WI.44 This solid component usually exhibits no diffusion restriction and progressive enhancement, displaying a type I perfusion curve consistent with its fibrous nature.47,49 Although rare, borderline cystadenofibromas may demonstrate intermediate-risk or high-risk time-intensity curves on dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, indicative of increased vascularity.47

Three morphological patterns of cystadenofibroma have been described, ranked by frequency (Figure 6):

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Cystadenofibroma. Pelvic MRI showing a multilocular cystic lesion with a nodular solid component (arrowhead) (A-D). The solid component has low SI on T2-WI (A) and no impeded diffusion (B, C). On post-contrast T1-WI (D), mild and late enhancement is seen. Three morphological patterns of cystadenofibroma have been described. Type I or “black sponge” (E, F): multilocular cystic lesion with fibrotic nodular solid component (very low SI on T2-WI) along the septa (arrow in E) or protruding into the loculi (F). Type II or “carpet-like” (G): unilocular cystic lesion with a plaque-like thickening of the cystic wall (arrow). Type III or “purely cystic” (H): no solid component can be noted in this pattern. Abbreviations: SI = signal intensity; WI = weighted imaging.

  • Type I, “black-sponge”: multilocular cystic mass with fibrotic nodular components along the septa or protruding into the loculi.

  • Type II “carpet-like”: uni or bilocular cystic mass with focal pseudo nodular or plaque-like thickening of the cyst walls.

  • Type III “purely-cystic”: cystic mass without evidence of a solid component.

Notably, a contralateral lesion is found in approximately 50% of cases, most often representing benign lesions, particularly cystadenofibromas.49

Lipid-poor teratoma, struma ovarii, and immature teratoma

Mature cystic teratoma (MCT) is the most common germ cell tumour, characterized by intralesional fat. However, in 15% of cases, fat is absent in the cystic component. Notably, only 6% of MCTs are entirely devoid of fat.

A small amount of fat may be present in the cystic wall or Rokitansky nodule, which, therefore require careful evaluation to avoid misdiagnosing lipid-poor MCT for other borderline or malignant epithelial lesions. In such cases, T1-WI in- and opposed-phase can aid in detecting subtle fat.50–52

Complications of MCT include torsion, rupture, and malignant transformation.53,54 Malignant transformation, although rare (1%-2%) and typically occurring in older patients, should be suspected if a large, enhancing solid component with transmural extension is observed, usually originating in the Rokitansky nodule. A typical Rokitansky nodule, in contrast, is usually smooth and rounded.50

MCT is also associated with specific conditions, such as growing teratoma syndrome, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, and immune encephalitis (Figure 7). Ovarian teratomas are implicated in up to 36% of patients presenting with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis.53,54

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Lipid-poor mature cystic teratoma. Pelvic MRI (A-C) and CT (D) in a 30-year-old patient with a small left adnexal lesion. The fat component is confined to the cystic wall and shows high SI on T1-WI (arrow in A), low SI on T1-WI with fat saturation (B) and hypodense appearance on CT image (D). The patient underwent an MRI brain because presenting with confusion, amnesia, loss of consciousness and seizures. FLAIR sequence (E) shows oedematous changes in the right temporal lobe consistent with the diagnosis of anti-NMDA encephalitis. Abbreviations: SI = signal intensity; WI = weighted imaging.

Struma ovarii is a rare subtype of monodermal teratoma predominantly or entirely composed of thyroid tissue, accounting for approximately 3% of all mature teratomas.55 Unlike other mature teratomas, it typically occurs in women over the age of 40 and may be associated with hyperthyroidism.44,51,56 Malignant transformation is rare and most often manifests as papillary thyroid carcinoma.51

On MRI, struma ovarii commonly appears as a large multicystic mass with loculi of varying SI on T1- and T2-WI, and solid components. Due to the colloid component, some cystic spaces exhibit very low SI on T2-WI and corresponding variable SI on T1-WI.44,51,53,57,58 The solid component may demonstrate variable diffusion restriction and vivid postcontrast enhancement.44 Fat is usually absent within the lesion, but punctate foci of high SI on T1-WI, representing focal areas of viscous material or haemorrhage, are a common finding55,57,58 (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Struma ovarii. Struma ovarii typically presents as large multilocular lesion with loculi of variable SI on MRI. Some of the loculi (arrowheads in A and B) show low SI on T2-WI (A) and high SI on T1-WI (B) due to the colloid component. Vivid enhancement of the solid component is also visible (curved arrow) in the postcontrast T1-WI (C). A mature cystic teratoma can be seen on the right side of the struma ovarii (asterisk). Abbreviations: SI = signal intensity; WI = weighted imaging.

Immature teratoma is the second most common malignant germ cell tumour after dysgerminoma, accounting for less than 1% of ovarian cancers. It typically affects young patients, with a median age of 19 years, and is usually unilateral. However, a contralateral MCT is found in up to 20% of cases.59

On MRI, it presents as a solid-cystic lesion with irregular solid components, usually forming obtuse angles with the lesion walls, showing tiny cystic foci within it. Fat is typically present as scattered foci within the solid component rather than in the cystic cavity. As seen in MCTs, calcifications also exhibit a distinct pattern, appearing irregularly distributed rather than coarsened or tooth-like.51,60 Raised levels of alpha-fetoprotein may aid the diagnosis.61

Dysgerminoma

Dysgerminoma is the most common malignant germ cell tumour, accounting for 1% to 2% of ovarian cancers. They primarily occur in adolescents and young adults or are diagnosed during pregnancy.62 The prognosis is excellent, with a 5-year overall survival rate approaching 100%.63

Dysgerminomas typically appear as large solid masses with nodular borders and variably thickened fibrovascular septa on ultrasound, CT, and MRI. Areas of haemorrhage or necrosis may be present within the lesion. These tumours are often diagnosed at an early stage, as they tend to spread late, primarily via the lymphatic system. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is rare and usually results from tumour rupture. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level is a valuable finding for diagnosis and follow-up62–64 (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Dysgerminoma. CT images of a 19-year-old girl showing a large multilocular lesion with enhancing fibrovascular septa of different thicknesses, in keeping with ovarian dysgerminoma. Note the absence of peritoneal or nodal involvement despite the lesion size.

The primary differential diagnoses include other solid-cystic ovarian tumours such as juvenile granulosa cell tumours, which typically exhibit a “spongelike” appearance on imaging and are associated with symptoms related to oestrogen production (e.g. precocious puberty), choriocarcinomas and yolk sac tumours, which are associated with raised level of alpha-fetoprotein, and sclerosing stromal tumours, that can be distinguished by their characteristic centripetal enhancement pattern on imaging.51,62

Tumours occurring at different sites

Some tumours, such as neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) or lymphoma, originate from cells that are not organ-specific and can consequently be found at multiple sites of the gynaecological tract and in different body districts.

Neuroendocrine tumours

NETs of the gynaecological tract have recently been reclassified into low-grade (previously termed carcinoid) and high-grade subtypes (formerly known as small-cell and large-cell NET). The term “carcinoid” remains in use exclusively for ovarian carcinoids, which are associated with indolent behaviour and favourable prognosis. Ovarian carcinoids typically arise within MCTs and remain confined to the ovary.65,66

The cervix is the most affected site in the gynaecological tract, predominantly by high-grade tumours, and NETs account for 1%-6% of cervical cancers.67,68

Radiologists must be aware of the poor prognosis associated with neuroendocrine cervical cancer, which has a median survival of 21-22 months compared with approximately 10 years for SCC. This is due to its aggressive behaviour, characterized by higher rates of lymphovascular space invasion, nodal and distant metastases, and recurrent disease. Comprehensive assessment for distant metastases is essential when evaluating scans of patients with NEC66,67 (Figure 10). Notably, up to 26% of recurrences involve the brain, making brain imaging imperative in cases of suspected recurrence.67

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Neuroendocrine tumour of the cervix. Sagittal T2-WI (A) shows an intermediate-SI lesion in the anterior part of the cervix, which on MRI cannot be distinguished from a common squamous cell carcinoma. Due to the aggressive behaviour of neuroendocrine tumours, additional disease sites can be present (arrows), such as the peritoneum (B, C), ovaries (D), bones (D), and lungs (E). Abbreviations: SI = signal intensity; WI = weighted imaging.

While studies have shown that NETs have significantly lower mean ADC values (<0.90 × 10³ mm2/s) than AC and SCC, their imaging features are generally nonspecific.68

Lymphoma

The genitourinary system accounts for 3% of extra-nodal lymphomas, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most common subtype. Secondary involvement of gynaecological organs occurs 10× more frequently than primary lymphomas and is associated with a worse prognosis. Thus, assessment of other sites of disease is crucial. The ovaries are the most affected site, followed by the cervix, uterine corpus, and vagina.69 The peak age for uterine lymphomas is 40-50 years, while ovarian lymphomas have a broader age range (26-81 years), with a median age of 46 years.70

Lymphomas usually present as large, homogeneous masses, often exceeding 5 cm in size. Despite their size, areas of haemorrhage or necrosis are rare, and ascites is uncommon. Growth patterns can be nodular or diffuse. Nodular lymphomas appear as solid, round, well-defined masses with nodular borders, causing less mass effect than expected for their volume. In contrast, diffuse lymphomas lead to symmetrical enlargement of the affected organ, resulting in organomegaly while preserving the organ’s structure.71

For example, cervical lymphomas typically manifest as large lesions with endophytic growth, causing diffuse enlargement of the cervix. A distinctive feature is the preservation of the cervical mucosa, which leads to missed detection during routine cervical cancer screenings72,73 (Figure 11).

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Diffuse large B-cell cervical lymphoma. On MRI, symmetrical and diffuse uterus enlargement can be noted due to lymphomatous infiltration. Despite the lesion size, no area of haemorrhage or necrosis is visible on postcontrast imaging (C). Preservation of the cervical mucosal layer (white circle), which is a distinguishing feature, is seen on axial and sagittal T2-WI (B, E), DWI images (F) and ADC map (G). Careful evaluation of additional disease sites (arrowheads) is needed, as seen on upper abdomen DWI (D) and FDG-PET/CT images (H). Abbreviation: WI = weighted imaging.

Similarly, ovarian lymphomas are large masses that preserve the ovarian structure with normal follicles, often visible at the periphery. On MRI, they show homogeneous high SI on T2-WI, which is higher than that of other solid tumours and mild enhancement.70

Suspecting ovarian lymphoma is critical to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions, as the treatment choices are chemotherapy and radiotherapy, while surgery does not improve prognosis in these cases.69

Aggressive angiomyxoma

Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare, slow-growing mesenchymal tumour that typically affects the pelvis and perineum in middle-aged women. Vulva is the most common site (58%), followed by the vagina, buttocks, and cervix. Although these tumours lack metastatic potential, they exhibit an infiltrative growth and a high local recurrence rate (28%-72%), which can occur up to 15 years after initial diagnosis.74,75

Clinical examination often underestimates the extent of these tumours, making MRI crucial for identifying their mesenchymal origin and precisely defining their anatomical extent. This infiltrative growth tends to displace rather than invade adjacent structures. Translevator extension is a distinctive feature and aids in diagnosis.3,76,77 Surgery with negative margins is the preferred treatment, but achieving this can be challenging due to the tumour’s highly infiltrative pattern. MRI helps evaluate the involvement of surrounding structures such as organs, bones, vessels, and nerves, thereby crucial for surgical planning.

On MRI, aggressive angiomyxomas manifest as solid multicompartmental masses with a laminated appearance. They show high SI on T2-WI due to their myxoid component, high water content, and vivid post-contrast enhancement but typically lack significant diffusion restriction (Figure 12). Additional features may include large collateral vessels, finger-like extensions, cystic changes, and occasional calcifications (6%-44%).77 In some cases, treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists can reduce tumour size, reflected by decreased SI on T2-WI and reduced contrast enhancement on MRI.3

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Aggressive angiomyxoma. MRI shows a solid mass with laminated appearance centred in the left pelvis, hyperintense on T2-WI (A). The lesion is more prominent on fat-saturated images (B) and shows vivid contrast enhancement (C). The characteristic translevator extension is visible on coronal images (arrow in D). Abbreviation: WI = weighted imaging.

Metastases

The ovary is the most commonly involved gynaecological organ in metastatic disease, followed by the fallopian tubes, while uterine involvement is rare.76,78 Ovarian metastases primarily originate from gastrointestinal cancers—particularly of the colon and stomach—followed by breast cancer, with lung and other malignancies being less frequent sources.51,76

Krukenberg tumours are a specific type of ovarian metastasis, characterized by the presence of signet ring cells, typically originating from the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly the stomach.76,79 Affected patients are generally younger compared with those with primary ovarian cancer.76

Distinguishing primary from secondary ovarian neoplasms can be challenging. On MRI, metastatic lesions exhibit variable SI on T2-weighted images depending on their composition—ranging from intermediate SI in solid lesions to high SI in cystic lesions. Metastases from breast and gastric cancers usually appear as predominantly solid, avidly enhancing masses, whereas metastases from other gastrointestinal sites or the biliary tract often present with cystic components that may mimic primary mucinous tumours.51,79 Imaging features favouring metastatic disease include bilateral ovarian involvement, a maximum lesion diameter of less than 13 cm, and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis.51

Metastatic involvement of the uterus is exceedingly rare and typically arises from breast or colorectal cancer. The cervix is almost invariably affected. Uterine metastases may present as either mass-forming lesions, predominantly in the cervix, or as diffuse infiltration leading to loss of the normal zonal anatomy and organ enlargement while preserving the overall uterine shape.76,80

Main imaging findings of the discussed tumours are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary

Key findings
Uterine corpus
Leiomyosarcoma Malignant
  • Only 0.2 % arise from a previous leyomioma

  • Large myometrial-based lesion, irregular borders, intermediate-to-high SI on T2-WI, heterogeneous contrast enhancement for haemorrhage and necrosis

  • The lesion shows higher SI than the endometrium or nodes on DWI and low-SI on ADC map

Endometrial stromal sarcoma Malignant
  • Endometrial-based lesion with significant myometrial invasion

  • Intralesional hypointense areas on T2- and T1-WI representing preserved myometrium (“worm-like appearance”).

  • Intramyometrial nodules, intravascular extension, and continuous spread to the surrounding structures via the fallopian tube or uterine ligaments are common

Carcinosarcoma Malignant
  • Large lesion within the endometrial cavity extending through the internal os

  • Progressive, persistent enhancement may help distinguish it from other endometrial cancer subtypes

  • High propensity for peritoneal involvement, nodal and distant metastases

Cervix
Gastric-type adenocarcinoma Malignant
  • Solid-cystic morphology with small cysts within the solid component

  • Infiltrative, endophytic growth centred within the cervical stroma leading to underestimation of the disease extension on MRI

  • The adnexa and the peritoneum are common disease sites

Ovaries
Cystoadenofibroma Predominantly benign, borderline and malignant forms are rare
  • Uni- or multilocular lesion with solid components showing markedly low SI on T2-WI and mild and progressive contrast enhancement.

  • Three morphological patterns: black-sponge, carpet-like, or purely cystic

  • Common mimicker of other epithelial tumours

Lipid poor teratoma Benign. Malignant transformation is possible
  • 15% of mature cystic teratomas

  • No intracavital fat in the cystic cavity but fat can be found within the cystic wall or Rokitansky nodule

Struma ovarii Benign. Malignant transformation is possible
  • Women >40 years old. Association with hyperthyroidism described

  • Large multilocular lesion. Loculi with different SI, some of them showing very low SI on T1-WI and variable SI on T2-WI, due to colloid component

  • Usually, absence of fat

Immature teratoma Malignant
  • Young patients

  • Large irregular solid component and scattered fatty foci within the solid component rather than in the cystic cavity

  • D.d.: mature cystic teratoma

  • Raised level of alpha-fetoprotein

Dysgerminoma Malignant
  • Adolescents and young adults

  • Large solid masses with nodular borders and variably thickened, enhancing fibrovascular septa

  • Serum lactate dehydrogenase for diagnosis and follow-up

Multiple sites
Neuroendocrine tumours Malignant
  • No specific imaging features

  • Ovarian carcinoid: usually in association with MCT; indolent behaviour and favourable prognosis

  • Cervical cancer: poor prognosis due to high rate of nodal and distant metastases and of recurrent disease

Lymphoma Malignant
  • Secondary involvement of gynaecological organs is more frequent than primary lymphoma

  • Large, homogeneous mass. Areas of haemorrhage or necrosis are rare

  • Nodular pattern: sharply demarcated round solid lesion with nodular borders causing less mass effect than expected for tumour size

  • Diffuse pattern: diffuse and symmetrical enlargement of the involved organ with preservation of the organ structure (eg, preservation of cervical mucosal layer or normal follicles at ovarian periphery)

Aggressive angiomyxoma Benign but locally invasive
  • Typically found in pelvis and perineum of middle-aged women

  • High rate of local recurrence due to infiltrative involvement of surrounding structures

  • Solid multicompartmental mass with laminated appearance, showing high SI on T2-WI and vivid post-contrast enhancement

  • Trans-levator ani muscle extension is typical

Metastases Malignant
  • Gastrointestinal and breast cancer are the most common primary malignancies

  • Ovarian metastases can be solid or mixed solid-cystic lesions (mimicking primary mucinous neoplasms)

  • Uterine metastases present as mass-forming lesions (cervix) or diffuse uterine enlargement with loss of the zonal anatomy and preserved organ shape

Conclusions

The management of rare tumours is raising significant awareness as unmet clinical needs due to the lack of specific treatment options. Radiologists can help address this challenge by understanding the clinical behaviour and imaging correlates that can aid in accurate diagnosis. Indeed, assessing tumour characteristics and disease extent can support clinical decision-making and treatment planning. Active participation in multidisciplinary team discussions is equally important, as it allows radiologists to gain up-to-date insight into clinical needs, ultimately improving patients’ management in these challenging scenarios.

Contributor Information

Silvia Bottazzi, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy; Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Luca Russo, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy; Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Veronica Celli, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.

Anna Rame, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Alessandra Iacono, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Guido Imbemba, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Evis Sala, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy; Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Benedetta Gui, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy.

Funding

None declared.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. Hohn AK, Brambs CE, Hiller GGR, May D, Schmoeckel E, Horn LC.  2020 WHO classification of female genital tumors. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81:1145-1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Park KJ.  Cervical adenocarcinoma: integration of HPV status, pattern of invasion, morphology and molecular markers into classification. Histopathology. 2020;76:112-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Figueiredo G, O'Shea A, Neville GM, Lee SI.  Rare mesenchymal tumors of the pelvis: Imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2022;42:143-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, et al. ; RARECARE Working Group. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2493-2511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Prasad V, Oseran A.  Do we need randomised trials for rare cancers?  Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1355-1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dooms M, Saesen R, Steemans I, Lansens J, Huys I.  Characteristics of early phase clinical trials for rare cancers: insights from interviews with stakeholders. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:775217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, et al.  Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33:147-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Roy M, Musa F, Taylor SE, Huang M.  Uterine sarcomas: how to navigate an ever-growing list of subtypes. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bergamini A, Joneborg U, Marquina G, et al.  82MO european multi-disciplinary tumor boards within the EURACAN network increasingly support management of patients with rare gynaecological tumors: 6-year activity results. ESMO Open. 2024;9:103542. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ceppi L, Bergamini A, Biagioli E, et al.  2022-RA-883-ESGO rare cancers in gynecologic oncology, ENGOT initiative for a european registry. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32:A273. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Joneborg U, Bergamini A, Wallin E, et al.  European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33:1621-1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brown J, Friedlander M, Backes FJ, et al.  Gynecologic cancer intergroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:S48-S54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Parra-Herran C, Howitt BE.  Uterine mesenchymal tumors: update on classification, staging, and molecular features. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12:363-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;165:22-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hindman N, Kang S, Fournier L, et al.  MRI evaluation of uterine masses for risk of leiomyosarcoma: a consensus statement. Radiology. 2023;306:e211658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bura V, Pintican RM, David RE, et al.  MRI findings in-between leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma: a Rad-Path correlation of degenerated leiomyomas and variants. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20210283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Valletta R, Corato V, Lombardo F, et al.  Leiomyoma or sarcoma? MRI performance in the differential diagnosis of sonographically suspicious uterine masses. Eur J Radiol. 2024;170:111217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. DeMulder D, Ascher SM.  Uterine leiomyosarcoma: can MRI differentiate leiomyosarcoma from benign leiomyoma before treatment?  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:1405-1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al.  CT and MRI of uterine sarcomas and their mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1369-1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Smith J, Zawaideh JP, Sahin H, Freeman S, Bolton H, Addley HC.  Differentiating uterine sarcoma from leiomyoma: BET(1)T(2)ER check!. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20201332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abdel Wahab C, Jannot A-S, Bonaffini PA, et al.  Diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign atypical leiomyomas from malignant uterine sarcomas with diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology. 2020;297:361-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Conklin CM, Longacre TA.  Endometrial stromal tumors: the new WHO classification. Adv Anat Pathol. 2014;21:383-393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, Yoshida S, Nishitani H, Shimazu H.  Pathologies of the uterine endometrial cavity: usual and unusual manifestations and pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2244-2255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Santos P, Cunha TM.  Uterine sarcomas: clinical presentation and MRI features. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21:4-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lin Y, Wu R-C, Huang Y-L, et al.  Uterine fibroid-like tumors: spectrum of MR imaging findings and their differential diagnosis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47:2197-2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Barral M, Placé V, Dautry R, et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging features of uterine sarcoma and mimickers. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1762-1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Pintican R, Bura V, Zerunian M, et al.  MRI of the endometrium—from normal appearances to rare pathology. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20201347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sousa FAE, Ferreira J, Cunha TM.  MR imaging of uterine sarcomas: a comprehensive review with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:5687-5706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ueda M, Otsuka M, Hatakenaka M, et al.  MR imaging findings of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: differentiation from endometrial carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:28-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li L, Huang W, Xue K, et al.  Clinical and imaging features of carcinosarcoma of the uterus and cervix. Insights Imaging. 2021;12:142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Masood M, Singh N.  Endometrial carcinoma: changes to classification (WHO 2020). Diagnostic Histopathology. 2021;27:493-499. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ravishankar P, Smith DA, Avril S, Kikano E, Ramaiya NH.  Uterine carcinosarcoma: a primer for radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44:2874-2885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gultekin M, Ramirez PT, Broutet N, Hutubessy R.  World Health Organization call for action to eliminate cervical cancer globally. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30:426-427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Arend R, et al.  NCCN guidelines(R) insights: cervical cancer, version 1.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21:1224-1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Saida T, Sakata A, Tanaka YO, et al.  Clinical and MRI characteristics of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma: its variants and mimics. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20:364-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kerwin CM, Markese M, Moroney MR, Smith LP, Patel NU.  Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix, gastric-type (GAS): a review of the literature focused on pathology and multimodality imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48:713-723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y.  MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23:425-445; quiz 534–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kido A, Mikami Y, Koyama T, et al.  Magnetic resonance appearance of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in comparison with that of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: a pitfall of newly described unusual subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:1474-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mori T, Kato H, Kawaguchi M, et al.  MRI characteristics for predicting histological subtypes in patients with uterine cervical adenocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2023;158:110612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Greenland NY, Wolsky RJ, Darragh TM, Vohra P.  Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma and cervical cytology: experience at a general hospital and review of the literature. Cytopathology. 2021;32:75-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hirai Y, Takeshima N, Haga A, Arai Y, Akiyama F, Hasumi K.  A clinicocytopathologic study of adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;70:219-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Karamurzin YS, Kiyokawa T, Parkash V, et al.  Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumor with unusual metastatic patterns and poor prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:1449-1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ehmann S, Sassine D, Straubhar AM, et al.  Gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix: cinical outcomes and genomic drivers. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;167:458-466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Avesani G, Panico C, Nougaret S, Woitek R, Gui B, Sala E.  ESR essentials: characterisation and staging of adnexal masses with MRI and CT-practice recommendations by ESUR. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:7673-7689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Avesani G, Elia L, Anghelone AG, et al.  Features of cystadenofibroma on magnetic resonance imaging: an update using the O-RADS lexicon and considering diffusion-weighted and perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2022;154:110429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Cho S-M, Byun JY, Rha SE, et al.  CT and MRI findings of cystadenofibromas of the ovary. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:798-804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Avesani G, Caliolo G, Gui B, et al.  Pearls and potential pitfalls for correct diagnosis of ovarian cystadenofibroma in MRI: a pictorial essay. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:1809-1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Tsuboyama T, Sato K, Ota T, et al.  MRI of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors: pathologic correlation and diagnostic challenges. Radiographics. 2022;42:2095-2111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tang YZ, Liyanage S, Narayanan P, et al.  The MRI features of histologically proven ovarian cystadenofibromas-an assessment of the morphological and enhancement patterns. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:48-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al.  Atypical CT and MRI manifestations of mature ovarian cystic teratomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:743-750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Taylor EC, Irshaid L, Mathur M.  Multimodality imaging approach to ovarian neoplasms with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2021;41:289-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H.  Mature cystic teratomas of the ovary without fat in the cystic cavity: MR features in 12 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:613-616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Saleh M, Bhosale P, Menias CO, et al.  Ovarian teratomas: clinical features, imaging findings and management. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46:2293-2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Magudia K, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Katabathina VS, Craig JW, Hammer MM.  Unusual imaging findings associated with germ cell tumours. Radiographics. 2019;39:1019-1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL.  Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics. 2001;21:475-490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. ; COU-AA-301 Investigators. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995-2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ikeuchi T, Koyama T, Tamai K, et al.  CT and MR features of struma ovarii. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:904-910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Dujardin MI, Sekhri P, Turnbull LW.  Struma ovarii: role of imaging?  Insights Imaging. 2014;5:41-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Alwazzan AB, Popowich S, Dean E, Robinson C, Lotocki R, Altman AD.  Pure immature teratoma of the ovary in adults: thirty-year experience of a single tertiary care center. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:1616-1622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cheng M, Causa Andrieu P, Kim T-H, et al.  Fat-containing adnexal masses on MRI: solid tissue volume and fat distribution as a guide for O-RADS score assignment. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48:358-366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yamaoka T, Togashi K, Koyama T, et al.  Immature teratoma of the ovary: correlation of MR imaging and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:313-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Amante S, Felix A, Cunha TM.  Ovarian dysgerminoma: clues to the radiological diagnosis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023;29:18-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Elsayes KM, et al.  Ovarian malignant germ cell tumors: cellular classification and clinical and imaging features. Radiographics. 2014;34:777-801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Guerriero S, Testa AC, Timmerman D, et al.  Imaging of gynecological disease (6): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian dysgerminoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:596-602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Winer I, Kim C, Gehrig P.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract update. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162:210-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Lopes Dias J, Cunha TM, Gomes FV, Calle C, Felix A.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the female genital tract: a case-based imaging review with pathological correlation. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:43-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Elsherif S, Odisio EGLC, Faria S, et al.  Imaging and staging of neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43:3468-3478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Duan X, Ban X, Zhang X, et al.  MR imaging features and staging of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix with pathological correlations. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:4293-4302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Rohena-Quinquilla IR, Lattin GE Jr, Wolfman D.  Imaging of extranodal genitourinary lymphoma. Radiol Clin North Am. 2016;54:747-764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Kim TM, Ahn H, Kim SY, et al.  MR imaging findings of ovarian lymphoma: differentiation from other solid ovarian tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024;49:220-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Alves Viera MA, Cunha TM.  Primary lymphomas of the female genital tract: imaging findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20:110-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Marin C, Seoane JM, Sanchez M, Ruiz Y, Garcia JA.  Magnetic resonance imaging of primary lymphoma of the cervix. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1541-1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Onyiuke I, Kirby AB, McCarthy S.  Primary gynecologic lymphoma: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W648-W655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Qu H, Liu N, Liang H, Wang Y, Zhuang H, Li H.  Aggressive angiomyxoma of female pelvis and perineum: retrospective study of 17 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:165-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Outwater EK, Marchetto BE, Wagner BJ, Siegelman ES.  Aggressive angiomyxoma: findings on CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:435-438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Micco M, Sala E, Lakhman Y, Hricak H, Vargas HA.  Imaging features of uncommon gynecologic cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:1346-1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Surabhi VR, Garg N, Frumovitz M, Bhosale P, Prasad SR, Meis JM.  Aggressive angiomyxomas: a comprehensive imaging review with clinical and histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:1171-1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Kutasovic JR, McCart Reed AE, Males R, et al.  Breast cancer metastasis to gynaecological organs: a clinico-pathological and molecular profiling study. J Pathol Clin Res. 2019;5:25-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Zulfiqar M, Koen J, Nougaret S, et al.  Krukenberg tumors: Update on imaging and clinical features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:1020-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Metser U, Haider MA, Khalili K, Boerner S.  MR imaging findings and patterns of spread in secondary tumor involvement of the uterine body and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:765-769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES