Abstract
We developed a green and efficient method for Pd‐catalyzed N‐arylation of ortho‐acylanilines in water using rhamnolipid‐based micellar catalysis. The (cinnamylPdCl)2/tBuXPhos system enables high yields at 40°C, significantly lower than conventional methods (>100°C), with broad substrate scope. This industrially produced biodegradable surfactant system offers a sustainable alternative to organic solvents, combining enhanced reactivity with improved energy efficiency and environmental compatibility.
Keywords: micellar catalysis, Pd‐catalyzed C—N bond formation, rhamnolipids, surfactant, sustainable
Aqueous micellar catalysis using industrially sourced rhamnolipids enables efficient Pd‐catalyzed N‐arylation of o‐acylanilines at 40°C. This surfactant‐driven system offers a sustainable and more efficient alternative to organic solvents, combining broad substrate scope, low catalyst loading, and enhanced energy efficiency.

1. Introduction
N‐aryl‐aminoacetophenones and N‐aryl‐aminobenzophenones are valuable building blocks in the synthesis of acridines and acridones [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], which are important in medicinal chemistry for their antimicrobial [6, 7], anticancer [8], and anti‐inflammatory [9, 10, 11] properties. A common approach for the synthesis of aminoacetophenones and aminobenzophenones involves palladium‐catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig cross‐coupling reactions between aryl bromides and the corresponding aniline derivatives with diverse substitution patterns (Scheme 1). While these palladium‐catalyzed methods offer efficient syntheses with broad functional group tolerance [12, 13, 14, 15, 16], they often require relatively harsh conditions such as elevated temperatures, and the use of strong bases or high catalyst loadings, all of which are not ecologically friendly and can limit substrate scope and scalability. These limitations highlight the need for milder and more sustainable synthetic alternatives, especially for sensitive or multifunctional substrates.
SCHEME 1.

N‐arylation strategy based on palladium‐catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig amination.
The use of micellar catalytic systems could offer an alternative strategy enabling and reaction conditions that require lower energy investment and lower palladium catalyst loading, which is an important aspect of green chemistry. The challenges associated with the harsh conditions of traditional palladium‐catalyzed amination reactions performed in organic media can be effectively addressed through the application of aqueous micellar catalysis.
Moreover, water is one of the most accessible and environmentally benign solvents in organic chemistry, due to its nontoxic, nonflammable nature, low cost, and high abundance. Although the use of water as a reaction medium aligns closely with the principles of green chemistry, a major limitation of its use as solvent in organic synthesis lies in its incompatibility with many organic reagents and catalysts, which often exhibit poor solubility in aqueous media. To overcome this challenge, innovative strategies such as “on water” reactions [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] and the use of surfactant‐based micellar systems were developed in the last decades [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. In micellar catalysis, amphiphilic surfactants self‐assemble into micelles that encapsulate hydrophobic reactants within their cores, creating a unique microenvironment that can dramatically enhance the rate and selectivity of organic transformations. Thanks to the beneficial effect of these systems, micellar catalysis has emerged as a powerful tool in aqueous‐phase organic synthesis, including transition metal‐catalyzed processes relevant to the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58]. Traditionally, synthetic surfactants are employed in these transformations. Besides their effective use, they raise concerns related to economy, sustainability, biodegradability, and environmental persistence. As an alternative, attention has turned toward biosurfactants, which are naturally derived surface‐active agents produced through microbial fermentation [59, 60, 61]. Biosurfactants offer several advantages as they are not only biodegradable [62, 63], but display an exceptionally low aquatic toxicity and can be synthesized from renewable feedstocks, including agricultural waste and other organic residues. In recent years, Vinayagam and co‐workers efficiently used natural saponin as surfactant for aqueous micellar catalysis and demonstrated its applicability in palladium‐catalyzed Suzuki [64] and amination [65] reactions.
Among the various classes of biosurfactants, rhamnolipids have attracted significant interest [66, 67, 68]. In nature, these species are produced mainly by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [69]. The wild type rhamnolipids consist of one or two rhamnose sugar units linked to two β‐hydroxy fatty acid chains, forming amphiphilic molecules such as mono‐rhamnolipid and di rhamnolipid (Figure 1). Due to their combination of superior solubilization with excellent environmental compatibility and mildness toward skin application they have successfully been applied in the fields of environmental remediation [70, 71, 72, 73], cosmetics [74], food processing [75, 76], and pharmaceuticals [69, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82]. Evonik has recently launched a di‐rhamnolipid bearing mainly two β‐hydroxy decanoic chains, produced on multi ton scale for household applications by fermentation based on sugar as solely carbon source [83].
FIGURE 1.

General structure of mono‐ and di‐rhamnolipids.
Despite their proven performance in other industries, the application of rhamnolipids in micellar organic synthesis and catalysis remains largely unexplored. Very recently, we have demonstrated their applicability in micellar catalysis [84], and we aimed to exploit their potential in organic synthesis considering the growing demand for sustainable and environmentally responsible chemical processes. In our recent work, we aimed to expand the applicability of the efficient biosurfactant based micellar catalytic system for the palladium‐catalyzed N‐arylation of acylanilines with aryl bromides (Scheme 1) under mild reaction conditions with low Pd catalyst loading.
2. Results and Discussion
For the optimization of the palladium‐catalyzed amination reaction, we selected bromobenzene and 2‐aminoacetophenone as coupling partners. The model reactions were performed at 40°C in a 4 w/w% aqueous rhamnolipid solution using KOH as strong base required for the Buchwald–Hartwig amination and deprotonate the lipids carboxylic group to maintain micelle integrity [85]. First, several commonly used palladium sources were screened, including Pd2(dba)3, (allylPdCl)2, and (cinnamylPdCl)2, in the presence of tBuXPhos ligand (Table 1, entries 1–3). Pd2(dba)3 afforded 81% conversion after 4 h, while (allylPdCl)2 showed poor reactivity with only 17% conversion. In contrast, (cinnamylPdCl)2 provided 92% conversion under identical conditions and reach complete conversion after 18 h (Entry 4), making it the most effective catalyst precursor. Using the same catalyst system, we repeated the reaction at rt and 60°C, and we observed 91% conversion after 18 h (Entry 5), and 99% conversion after 4 h (Entry 6). For further studies, we selected (cinnamylPdCl)2 as palladium source and performed the couplings at 40°C, considering as optimal reaction temperature and reaction time.
TABLE 1.
Optimization of catalyst system for the Pd‐catalyzed amination in Rhamnolipid solution.a
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Pd loading/ppm | Pd source | Ligand | Time, h | Conv., %b |
| 1 | 500 | Pd2dba3 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 81 |
| 2 | 500 | (AllylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 17 |
| 3 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 92 |
| 4 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 18 | 100 |
| 5 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 18 | 91c |
| 6 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 99d |
| 7 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | BippyPhos | 18 | 85 |
| 8 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | XPhos, PCy3·HBF4, QPhos, dppf, P(tBu)3, PPh3 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | 1000 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 100 |
| 10 | 250 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 4 | 63 |
| 11 | 250 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 18 | 92 |
| 12 | 50 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 18 | 20 |
| 13 | 500 | (cinnamylPdCl)2 | tBuXPhos | 2 | 100e |
Standard reaction conditions: Bromobenzene (0.5 mmol), 2‐aminoacetophenon (1.2 equiv.), Pd source (50–1000 ppm), ligand (200–2000 ppm), KOH (1.5 equiv.) in 1 mL degassed surfactant solution, 40°C, N2 atmosphere.
Conversion was determined with GC–MS.
Reaction was performed at rt.
Reaction was performed on 60°C.
Precomplexed (cinnamylPdCl)2/tBuXPhos stock solution was used.
Next, various ligands beyond tBuXPhos were evaluated to identify the most suitable ligand for the amination reaction performed in the rhamnolipid‐based micellar system.
Under the previously used catalytic conditions, BippyPhos also showed good performance with 85% conversion in 18 h at 40°C (Entry 7). However, other tested ligands, including XPhos, PCy3·HBF4, QPhos, dppf, P(tBu)3, and PPh3, were formed completely inactive catalyst systems, providing no detectable product under the applied reaction conditions (Entry 8). This phenomenon could be explained with the lower catalytic power of the corresponding Pd‐phosphine system at relatively low reaction temperatures.
After finding the most efficient catalyst system, we investigated the effect of catalyst loading higher and lower than 500 ppm Pd complex, used in the previous experiments. Reactions were conducted using 1000 ppm, 250 ppm, and 50 ppm of the (cinnamylPdCl)2 complex together with 4 equivalents of tBuXPhos ligand. Complete conversion of the amination reaction was achieved at 1000 ppm Pd‐complex loading after 4 h (Entry 9). However, lowering the amount of catalyst to 250 ppm or 50 ppm resulted in significantly reduced conversion, and the reaction did not reach complete conversion even after 18 h (Entries 11 and 12). We concluded that at least 500 ppm catalyst loading is required to maintain high efficiency under these mild reaction conditions.
To further improve catalytic performance and reproducibility, a preformed catalyst stock solution was prepared by combining (cinnamylPdCl)2 and tBuXPhos in 4 w/w% rhamnolipid solution. Using this stock solution at 500 ppm Pd‐complex loading under optimized conditions resulted in complete conversion within 2 h (Entry 13). In comparison, the same reaction using separately added catalyst and ligand gave only 68% conversion after 2 h (not shown in table). It is of note, the stock solution remained catalytically active after 1 week of storage at room temperature, demonstrating its excellent stability and operational convenience for repetitive or scaled‐up applications.
The influence of rhamnolipid concentration on the reaction performance was also examined (Table 2). Coupling reactions were carried out in rhamnolipid solutions of 1, 2, 4, and 5 w/w%, as well as in pure water (Entries 1–5). While all rhamnolipid‐containing reactions reached 100% conversion after 18 h, reaction rates were considerably faster in 4 and 5 w/w% rhamnolipid solutions compared to 1 and 2 w/w% on the basis of conversion data after 6 h.
TABLE 2.
Study of solvent effect on the Pd‐catalyzed amination.a
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Solvent | Surfactant concentration, w/w% | Conversion after 6 h, %b | Conversion after 18 h, %c |
| 1 | Rhamnolipids | 5 w/w% | 97 | 100 |
| 2 | Rhamnolipids | 4 w/w% | 96 | 100 |
| 3 | Rhamnolipids | 2 w/w% | 86 | 100 |
| 4 | Rhamnolipids | 1 w/w% | 84 | 100 |
| 5 | water‐ | 0 w/w% (pure water) | 57 | 72 |
| 6 | TPGS‐750‐M | 4 w/w% | 96 | 100 |
| 7 | Tween 80 | 4 w/w% | 97 | 100 |
| 8 | Kolliphor | 4 w/w% | 85 | 93 |
| 9 | tBuOH, | — | 6 | 6 |
| 10 | Dioxane | — | 3 | 4 |
| 11 | Toluene | — | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | neat‐ | — | 58 | 71 (36 h) |
Standard reaction conditions: Bromobenzene (0.5 mmol), 2‐aminoacetophenon (1.2 equiv.), (cinnamylPdCl)2 (500 ppm), tBuXPhos (2000 ppm), KOH (1.5 equiv.) in 1 mL degassed surfactant solution or organic solvent, 40°C, N2 atmosphere.
Samples were taken at two different indicated times.
Conversions measured at given reaction times, and they were determined with GC–MS.
In contrast, the reaction in pure water reached only 72% conversion after 18 h (Entry 5) and did not improve beyond 80% even after 48 h (data not shown in Table 2), indicating that the presence of rhamnolipid micelles is essential for achieving complete conversion within practical timeframes.
A comparative study with alternative surfactants such as TPGS‐750‐M, Tween 80, Kolliphor was also performed, using the optimized reactions conditions and the most efficient catalyst system (Table 2, Entries 6–8). With the exception of Kolliphor, all surfactants enabled the reaction to proceed full conversion after 18 h confirming that the rhamnolipid biosurfactant‐based medium offers sustainable alternative to known chemically produced surfactants.
To assess the practical advantage of the rhamnolipid micellar system with organic media, the efficiency of the palladium‐catalyzed amination was compared with conventional organic solvents such as tert‐butanol, dioxane, and toluene, as well as under neat conditions (Entries 9–12). Surprisingly, the reaction showed no significant progress in any of the organic solvents at 40°C, yielding less than 6% conversion in tBuOH after 18 h (Entry 9). Although coupling under neat reaction conditions gave 58% conversion after 6 h, the reaction reached only 71% conversion after 36 h reaction time (Entry 12). These findings highlight a critical advantage of the aqueous rhamnolipid system over organic solvents. The micellar media allows efficient catalysis at significantly lower temperatures without the need for organic solvents, representing an important benefit from green chemistry and sustainability perspective.
Under the optimized reaction conditions—using a stock solution of palladium complex made from (cinnamylPdCl)2 and tBuXPhos in 4 w/w% aqueous rhamnolipid solution, 1.5 equivalents of KOH, at 40°C for 18 h—the scope and limitations of the micellar Pd‐catalyzed N‐arylation were systematically investigated (Scheme 2). The model reaction between bromobenzene and 2‐aminobenzophenone provided the diarylamine product (1) in 90% isolated yield (5 mmol scale), establishing a reliable benchmark for further substrate exploration. To evaluate the compatibility of various aryl bromides, 2‐aminoacetophenone was employed as a nucleophilic partner in the palladium‐catalyzed coupling reaction. Electron‐rich substrates such as 2‐, 3‐, and 4‐bromotoluene were smoothly converted to the corresponding products 4, 5, and 6 in 94%, 94%, and 87% yields, respectively. The presence of a bulky electron‐donating tert‐butyl group in the para‐position, in case of 4‐tert‐butylbromobenzene, had no detrimental effect on reactivity, yielding the coupled product (7) in 98% isolated yield. Moreover, highly electron‐rich substrates, such as a para‐dimethylamino‐, and para‐methoxybromobenzene, were transformed efficiently, affording products 8 and 9 in 77% and 92% yield. Electron‐deficient arylbromides such as para‐cyano‐ and para‐trifluoromethylbromobenzene also showed excellent compatibility, giving the desired amines (10 and 11) in 98% and 74% yield, respectively.
SCHEME 2.

Scope of the Pd‐catalyzed amination reaction of aryl halides and amines. Standard reaction conditions: aryl bromide (2 mmol), aromatic amine (1.05 equiv.), stock solution of [(cinnamyl)PdCl)2] and tBuXPhos, KOH (1.5 equiv.), 3.8 mL degassed rhamnolipids solution, N2 atmosphere. 40°C. a 5 mmol ArBr scale.
Importantly, functional groups sensitive to nucleophilic or basic aqueous environments, such as esters, remained intact under the micellar conditions. The coupling reaction with an aryl bromide bearing an ester moiety proceeded smoothly, affording products (12 and 13) in 85% and 73% yield without signs of hydrolysis. Halogen substituents, such as fluoro and chloro groups, were also tolerated, and the corresponding products 14, 15, and 16 were isolated in yields ranging from 84% to 91%. The method was further extended to heteroaryl bromide, 3‐bromopyridine as a representative heterocyclic electrophile and the coupling afforded the desired N‐arylated product (17) in 90% yield.
In the second part of the substrate scope, the reactivity of various aniline nucleophiles was evaluated using bromobenzene as the electrophilic partner.
2‐Aminobenzaldehyde afforded the corresponding diarylamine (18) in 95% isolated yield, indicating the stability of the formyl group under the reaction conditions. Substituted aminoacetophenones provided the desired N‐arylated products (19–22) in excellent yields ranging from 90% to 95%. Similarly, 2‐aminobenzophenone was efficiently arylated, yielding product 23 in 90% isolated yield. The method also tolerated the presence of chloro‐ and fluoro‐ functions on the aniline fragment and coupling reactions afforded the desired products (24–27) in 63–92% yields, demonstrating the functional group tolerance of the catalytic system.
Pyridyl‐containing amino substrates were also suitable for this transformation. Under the optimized aqueous micellar conditions, these heterocyclic amines gave the desired N‐arylated products (22 and 28) in 89% and 71% yields, respectively. The results of the scope and limitation study demonstrate the broad applicability and robustness of the developed micellar catalytic system, which enables the efficient green N‐arylation of a wide range of amines and aryl halides in water under mild reaction conditions.
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have developed a highly efficient and environmentally benign method for the Pd‐catalyzed N‐arylation of aminoacetophenones and aminobenzophenones utilizing micellar catalysis of aqueous di‐rhamnolipid solutions. The use of a preformed (cinnamylPdCl)2/tBuXPhos stock solution in 4 w/w% rhamnolipid media enabled efficient coupling reactions under mild conditions (40°C) with catalyst loading down to 500 ppm. Optimization studies highlighted the critical role of the ligand, the surfactant concentration, and the catalyst preformation in maximizing reactivity. The protocol showed broad substrate scope and excellent functional group tolerance, including heterocycles and sensitive moieties such as esters, aldehydes, and halogens. Notably, the reactions performed poorly in conventional organic solvents under ambient reaction conditions, emphasizing the unique advantage of the micellar system in facilitating green and energy‐efficient transformations. This methodology offers a sustainable alternative to traditional cross‐coupling reactions for the synthesis of the target building blocks and demonstrates the promising utility of biosurfactants in modern catalytic processes.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [87–92]. Supporting Table S1: Measurement table for solutions of different concentrations for 100 ml of solution.
Funding
This study was supported by the Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (K143439) and Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (Lendület LP2023‐12/2023).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Research was supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office (K143439), Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Lendület LP2023‐12/2023). The authors thank the analytical measurements for László Burai, Márton Zwillinger, and Tamás Gáti at Servier Research Institute of Medicinal Chemistry. The authors thank Evonik Operations GmbH for rhamnolipid samples as well as Joachim Venzmer and Michael Nonnenmacher of Research, Development and Innovation department for scientific discussions.
Data Availbility Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1. Wang M., Kong L., Wang F., and Li X., “Rhodium‐Catalyzed Amination and Annulation of Arenes with Anthranils: C‐H Activation Assisted by Weakly Coordinating Amides,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 359 (2017): 4411–4416. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Huang H., Jiang Y., Yuan W., and Lin Y.‐M., “Modular Assembly of Acridines by Integrating Photo‐Excitation of o‐Alkyl Nitroarenes with Copper‐Promoted Cascade Annulation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202409653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gao Y., Yang S., Li Y., et al., “Copper‐Catalyzed Electrophilic Amination of Arylboronic Acids with Anthranils: An Access to N‐Aryl‐2‐Aminophenones,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 85 (2020): 10222–10231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huang P.‐C., Parthasarathy K., and Cheng C. H., “Copper‐Catalyzed Intramolecular Oxidative C‐H Functionalization and C‐N Formation of 2‐Aminobenzophenones: Unusual Pseudo‐1,2‐Shift of the Substituent on the Aryl Ring,” Chemistry – A European Journal 19 (2013): 460–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mahmood T., Wu Y., Loriot D., Kuimova M., and Ladame S., “Closing the Ring to Bring Up the Light: Synthesis of a Hexacyclic Acridinium Cyanine Dye,” Chemistry – A European Journal 18 (2012): 12349–12356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gensicka‐Kowalewska M., Cholewinski G., and Dzierzbicka K., “Recent Developments in the Synthesis and Biological Activity of Acridine/Acridone Analogues,” RSC Advances 7 (2017): 15776–15804. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mandal T., Karmakar S., Kapat A., and Dash J., “Studies Directed towards the Synthesis of the Acridone Family of Natural Products: Total Synthesis of Acronycines and Atalaphyllidines,” ACS Omega 6 (2021): 27062–27069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yadav T. T., Murahari M., Peters G. J., and Yc M., “A Comprehensive Review on Acridone Based Derivatives as Future Anti‐Cancer Agents and Their Structure Activity Relationships,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 239 (2022): 114527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chen Y.‐L., Lu C.‐M., Chen I.‐L., Tsao L.‐T., and Wang J.‐P., “Synthesis and Antiinflammatory Evaluation of 9‐Anilinoacridine and 9‐Phenoxyacridine Derivatives,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2002): 4689–4694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Belmont P., Bosson J., Godet T., and Tiano M., “Acridine and Acridone Derivatives, Anticancer Properties and Synthetic Methods: Where Are We Now?,” Anti‐Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry 7 (2007): 139–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cholewinski G., Dzierzbicka K., and Kolodziejczyk A. M., “Natural and Synthetic Acridines/Acridones as Antitumor Agents: Their Biological Activities and Methods of Synthesis,” Pharmacological Reports 63 (2011): 305–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Puls F., Kataeva O., and Knoelker H.‐J., “Synthesis of Euchrestifoline Using Iron‐and Palladium‐Catalyzed C·H Bond Activations,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018 (2018): 4272–4276. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Li Q., Moussallen C., Castet F., et al., “Direct Triple Annulations: A Way to Design Large Triazastarphenes with Intertwined Hexagonal Packing,” Organic Letters 24 (2022): 344–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tsvelikhovsky D. and Buchwald S. L., “Concise Palladium‐Catalyzed Synthesis of Dibenzodiazepines and Structural Analogues,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133 (2011): 14228–14231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhang D., Shao Y.‐B., Xie W., et al., “Remote Enantioselective Desymmetrization of 9,9‐Disubstituted 9,10‐Dihydroacridines through Asymmetric Aromatic Aminations,” ACS Catalysis 12 (2022): 14609–14618. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhou J., Li L., Yang M., and Wei W., “Computational Design of an Intramolecular Photocyclization Reaction with State‐Selective Reactivity: A Strategy for Indole Synthesis,” Green Chemistry 21 (2019): 5521–5527. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Narayan S., Muldoon J., Finn M. G., Fokin V. V., Kolb H. C., and Sharpless K. B., ““On Water”: Unique Reactivity of Organic Compounds in Aqueous Suspension,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44 (2005): 3275–3279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chanda A. and Fokin V. V., “Organic Synthesis “On Water,” Chemical Reviews 109 (2009): 725–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Simon M.‐O. and Li C.‐J., “Green Chemistry Oriented Organic Synthesis in Water,” Chemical Society Reviews 41 (2012): 1415–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Saikia B., Boruah P. R., Ali A. A., and Sarma D., “On‐Water’ Organic Synthesis: A Green, Highly Efficient, Low Cost and Reusable Catalyst System for Biaryl Synthesis under Aerobic Conditions at Room Temperature,” RSC Advances 5 (2015): 50655. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ren Z.‐G., Young D. J., Yang W., Xu W.‐D., and Ning J.‐J., “Aqueous Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling with Ultralow Palladium Loading and Simple Product Separation,” Synlett 31 (2020): 1303–1307. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chudasama V., Ahern J. M., Dhokia D. V., Fitzmaurice R. J., and Caddick S., “Functionalisation of Aldehydesvia Aerobic Hydroacylation of Azodicarboxylates ‘on’ Water,” Chemical Communications 47 (2011): 3269–3271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shapiro N., Kramer M., Goldberg I., and Vigalok A., “Straightforward Radical Organic Chemistry in Neat Conditions and “on Water”,” Green Chemistry 12 (2010): 582–584. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Voutyritsa E. and Kokotos C. G., “Green Metal‐Free Photochemical Hydroacylation of Unactivated Olefins,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59 (2020): 1735–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Shapiro N. and Vigalok A., “Highly Efficient Organic Reactions “on Water”, “in Water”, and Both,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47 (2008): 2849–2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lorenzetto T., Berton G., Fabris F., and Scarso A., “Recent Designer Surfactants for Catalysis in Water,” Catalysis Science & Technology 10 (2020): 4492–4502. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lee N. R., Cortes‐Clerget M., Wood A. B., et al., “Coolade. A Low‐Foaming Surfactant for Organic Synthesis in Water,” ChemSusChem 12 (2019): 3159–3165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lipshutz B. H., Ghorai S., and Cortes‐Clerget M., “The Hydrophobic Effect Applied to Organic Synthesis: Recent Synthetic Chemistry “in Water”,” Chemistry – A European Journal 24 (2018): 6672–6695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cortes‐Clerget M., Yu J., Kincaid J. R. A., Walde P., Gallou F., and Lipshutz B. H., “Water as the Reaction Medium in Organic Chemistry: From Our Worst Enemy to Our Best Friend,” Chemical Science 12 (2021): 4237–4266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sorella G. L., Strukul G., and Scarso A., “Recent Advances in Catalysis in Micellar Media,” Green Chemistry 17 (2015): 644–683. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lipshutz B. H. and Ghorai S., “Transitioning Organic Synthesis From Organic Solvents to Water. What's Your E Factor?,” Green Chemistry 16 (2014): 3660–3679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lipshutz B. H., Isley N. A., Fennewald J. C., and Slack E. D., “On the Way Towards Greener Transition‐Metal‐Catalyzed Processes as Quantified by E Factors,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52 (2013): 10952–10958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Compagno N., Profeta R., and Scarso A., “Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Active Pharmaceutical and Agrochemical Ingredients in Micellar Media,” Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 39 (2023): 100729. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Takale B. S., Thakore R. R., Irvine N. M., Schuitman A. D., Li X., and Lipshutz B. H., “Sustainable and Cost‐Effective Suzuki–Miyaura Couplings toward the Key Biaryl Subunits of Arylex and Rinskor Active,” Organic Letters 22 (2020): 4823–4827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lipshutz B. H. and Abela A. R., “Micellar Catalysis of Suzuki−Miyaura Cross‐Couplings with Heteroaromatics in Water,” Organic Letters 10 (2008): 5329–5332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Handa S., Slack E. D., and Lipshutz B. H., “Nano‐Nickel‐Catalyzed Suzuki‐Miyaura Cross‐Couplings in Water,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015): 11994–11998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Isley N. A., Wang Y., Gallou F., Handa S., Aue D. H., and Lipshutz B. H., “A Micellar Catalysis Strategy for Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Couplings of 2‐Pyridyl MIDA Boronates: No Copper, in Water, Very Mild Conditions,” ACS Catalysis 7 (2017): 8331–8337. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Guo P., Zhang H., Zhou J., Gallou F., Parmentier M., and Wang H., “Micelle‐Enabled Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Coupling of Heteroaryl Boronate Esters,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 83 (2018): 7523–7527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sanzone A., Calascibetta A., Ghiglietti E., et al., “Suzuki–Miyaura Micellar One‐Pot Synthesis of Symmetrical and Unsymmetrical 4,7‐Diaryl‐5,6‐Difluoro‐2,1,3‐Benzothiadiazole Luminescent Derivatives in Water and under Air,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 83 (2018): 15029–15042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lipshutz B. H., Chung D. W., and Rich B., “Sonogashira Couplings of Aryl Bromides: Room Temperature, Water Only, No Copper,” Organic Letters 10 (2008): 3793–3796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Handa S., Smith J. D., Zhang Y., Takale B. S., Gallou F., and Lipshutz B. H., “Sustainable HandaPhos‐ ppm Palladium Technology for Copper‐Free Sonogashira Couplings in Water under Mild Conditions,” Organic Letters 20 (2018): 542–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jakobi M., Gallou F., Sparr C., and Parmentier M., “A General Protocol for Robust Sonogashira Reactions in Micellar Medium,” Helvetica Chimica Acta 102 (2019): e1900024. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lu G., Cai C., and Lipshutz B. H., “Stille Couplings in Water at Room Temperature,” Green Chemistry 15 (2013): 105–109. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Takale B. S., Thakore R. R., Casotti G., Li X., Gallou F., and Lipshutz B. H., “Mild and Robust Stille Reactions in Water Using Parts Per Million Levels of a Triphenylphosphine‐Based Palladacycle,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 4158–4163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lipshutz B. H., Chung D. W., and Rich B., “Aminations of Aryl Bromides in Water at Room Temperature,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 351 (2009): 1717–1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wagner P., Bollenbach M., Doebelin C., et al., “T‐BuXPhos: A Highly Efficient Ligand for Buchwald–Hartwig Coupling in Water,” Green Chemistry 16 (2014): 4170–4178. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Salomé C., Wagner P., Bollenbach M., Bihel F., Bourguignon J.‐J., and Schmitt M., “Buchwald–Hartwig Reactions in Water Using Surfactants,” Tetrahedron 70 (2014): 3413–3421. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Yousif D., Monti M., Papagni A., and Vaghi L., “Synthesis of Phenazines From Ortho‐Bromo Azo Compounds via Sequential Buchwald‐Hartwig Amination under Micellar Conditions and Acid Promoted Cyclization,” Tetrahedron Letters 61 (2020): 152511. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ansari T. N., Taussat A., Clark A. H., et al., “Insights on Bimetallic Micellar Nanocatalysis for Buchwald–Hartwig Aminations,” ACS Catalysis 9 (2019): 10389–10397. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Steven A., “Micelle‐Mediated Chemistry in Water for the Synthesis of Drug Candidates,” Synthesis 51 (2019): 2632–2647. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kincaid J. R. A., Kavthe R. D., Caravez J. C., Takale B. S., Thakore R. R., and Lipshutz B. H., “Environmentally Responsible and Cost‐Effective Synthesis of the Antimalarial Drug Pyronaridine,” Organic Letters 24 (2022): 3342–3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Yu J., Iyer K. S., and Lipshutz B. H., “An Environmentally Responsible Synthesis of the Antitumor Agent Lapatinib (Tykerb,” Green Chemistry 24 (2022): 3640–3643. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fleck N., Thomas R. M., Müller M., Grimme S., and Lipshutz B. H., “An Environmentally Responsible Route to Tezacaftor, a Drug for Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis Prepared in Water via Ppm Au Catalysis as Entry to 2‐Substituted Indoles,” Green Chemistry 24 (2022): 6517–6523. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lipshutz B. H., Ghorai S., Abela A. R., et al., “TPGS‐750‐M: A Second‐Generation Amphiphile for Metal‐Catalyzed Cross‐Couplings in Water at Room Temperature,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 76 (2011): 4379–4391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cortes‐Clerget M., Spink S. E., Gallagher G. P., et al., “MC‐1. A “Designer” Surfactant Engineered for Peptide Synthesis in Water at Room Temperature,” Green Chemistry 21 (2019): 2610–2614. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kincaid J. R. A., Wong M. J., Akporji N., Gallou F., Fialho D. M., and Lipshutz B. H., “Introducing Savie: A Biodegradable Surfactant Enabling Chemo‐ and Biocatalysis and Related Reactions in Recyclable Water,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 4266–4278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Saunders J. M., Rodriguez K. B. D., Lammert R. M., et al., “Recent Green and Sustainable Pd‐Catalyzed Aminations,” ChemSusChem 18 (2025): e202500184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Iyer K. S., Kavthe R. D., Lammert R. M., Yirak J. R., and Lipshutz B. H., “Ligated Pd‐Catalyzed Aminations of Aryl/Heteroaryl Halides with Aliphatic Amines under Sustainable Aqueous Micellar Conditions,” JACS Au 4 (2024): 680–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Marchant R. and Banat I. M., “Biosurfactants: A Sustainable Replacement for Chemical Surfactants?,” Biotechnology Letters 34 (2012): 1597–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Santos D., Rufino R., Luna J., Santos V., and Sarubbo L., “Biosurfactants: Multifunctional Biomolecules of the 21st Century,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17 (2016): 401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Sarubbo L. A., da Gloria C. S. M., Durval I. J. B., et al., “Biosurfactants: Production, Properties, Applications, Trends, and General Perspectives,” Biochemical Engineering Journal 181 (2022): 108377. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Mohan P. K., Nakhla G., and Yanful E. K., “Biokinetics of Biodegradation of Surfactants under Aerobic, Anoxic and Anaerobic Conditions,” Water Research 40 (2006): 533–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Rodríguez‐López L., Rincón‐Fontán M., Vecino X., Moldes A. B., and Cruz J. M., “Biodegradability Study of the Biosurfactant Contained in a Crude Extract From Corn Steep Water,” Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 23 (2020): 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Vinayagam V., Sadhukhan S. K., Kasu S. R., et al., “Saponin: A Green and Efficient Natural Surfactant for Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Couplings of Heteroaryl Substrates in Aqueous Media at Ambient Conditions,” Green Chemistry 26 (2024): 1393–1398. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Vinayagam V., Sadhukhan S. K., Baledi D., et al., “Green Approach for Pd‐Catalyzed C–N Bond Formation with Weak Nitrogen Nucleophiles Using Saponin‐Based Micellar Catalysis: Arylation of Anilines, Amides, Carbamates, Ureas, and Sulfonamides,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 13 (2025): 5939–5952. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Nitschke M., Costa S. G. V. A. O., and Contiero J., “Rhamnolipid Surfactants: An Update on the General Aspects of These Remarkable Biomolecules,” Biotechnology Progress 21 (2005): 1593–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Abdel‐Mawgoud A. M., Lépine F., and Déziel E., “Rhamnolipids: Diversity of Structures, Microbial Origins and Roles,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 86 (2010): 1323–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Müller M. M., Kügler J. H., Henkel M., et al., “Rhamnolipids—Next Generation Surfactants?,” Journal of Biotechnology 162 (2012): 366–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Maier R. M. and Soberón‐Chávez G., “Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Rhamnolipids: Biosynthesis and Potential Applications,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54 (2000): 625–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Herman D. C., Artiola J. F., and Miller R. M., “Removal of Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc From Soil by a Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant,” Environmental Science & Technology 29 (1995): 2280–2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Mulligan C. N., Yong R. N., and Gibbs B. F., “On the use of Biosurfactants for the Removal of Heavy Metals From Oil‐Contaminated Soil,” Environmental Progress 18 (1999): 50–54. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Fernandes P. L., Rodrigues E. M., Paiva F. R., Ayupe B. A. L., McInerney M. J., and Tótola M. R., “Biosurfactant, Solvents and Polymer Production by Bacillus Subtilis RI4914 and Their Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery,” Fuel 180 (2016): 551–557. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Chaprão M. J., Ferreira I. N. S., Correa P. F., et al., “Application of Bacterial and Yeast Biosurfactants for Enhanced Removal and Biodegradation of Motor Oil From Contaminated Sand,” Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 18 (2015): 471–479. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Adu A., Naughton P. J., Marchant R., and Banat I. M., “Microbial Biosurfactants in Cosmetic and Personal Skincare Pharmaceutical Formulations,” Pharmaceutics 12 (2020): 1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Nitschke M. and Costa S. G. V. A. O., “Biosurfactants in Food Industry,” Trends in Food Science & Technology 18 (2007): 252–259. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Zhang J., Bing L., and Reineccius G. A., “Comparison of Modified Starch and Quillaja Saponins in the Formation and Stabilization of Flavor Nanoemulsions,” Food Chemistry 192 (2016): 53–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Giri S., Ahamed M. I., and Prasad R., ”Application of Microbial Biosurfactants in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” in Microbial Biosurfactants, eds. Inamuddin, .Ahamed M. I. and Prasad R. (Springer, 2021), 251–269. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Haba E., Pinazo A., Jauregui O., Espuny M. J., Infante M. R., and Manresa A., “Physicochemical Characterization and Antimicrobial Properties of Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa 47T2 NCBIM. 40044,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering 81 (2003): 316–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Miozzari G. F., Niederberger P., and Hütter R., “Permeabilization of Microorganisms by Triton X‐100,” Analytical Biochemistry 90 (1978): 220–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Gurtubay J. I. G., Goñi F. M., Gómez‐Fernández J. C., Otamendi J. J., and Macarulla J. M., “Triton X‐100 Solubilization of Mitochondrial Inner and Outer Membranes,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 12 (1980): 47–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Nitschke M., Costa S. G. V. A. O., and Contiero J., “Structure and Applications of a Rhamnolipid Surfactant Produced in Soybean Oil Waste,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160 (2010): 2066–2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Abalos A., Pinazo A., Infante M. R., Casals M., García F., and Manresa A., “Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of New Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa AT10 From Soybean Oil Refinery Wastes,” Langmuir 17 (2001): 1367–1371. [Google Scholar]
- 83. Brandt K., Dahl V., Muss A., et al., “Rhamnolipids – A Sustainable Surfactant for Personal Care Applications,” SOFW Journal 144 (2018): 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- 84. Adamik R., Herczegh A. R., Varga I., May Z., and Novák Z., “Gate to a Parallel Universe: Utilization of Biosurfactants in Micellar Catalysis,” Green Chemistry 25 (2023): 3462–3468. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Applicability of additional bases such as Na2CO3, Na3PO4, NaHCO3, NaOAc and tBuOK was studied, but none of them was as effective as KOH. For details, see Supporting Information.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
