Skip to main content
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira logoLink to Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira
. 2026 Apr 10;41:e411626. doi: 10.1590/acb411626

Effects of maternal arginine supplementation during lactation on offspring growth and wound healing in an experimental rat model of intrauterine malnutrition

Ayrton Alves Aranha Junior 1,2,*, Jorge Eduardo Fouto Matias 2, Djanira Aparecida da Luz Veronez 3, Lucia de Noronha 4, João Carlos Repka 5, Rafaella Toledo Aranha 6, Antônio Carlos Ligocki Campos 1
PMCID: PMC13073036  PMID: 41983800

ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To evaluate the effects of maternal arginine-enriched diet during lactation, following gestational undernutrition, on offspring growth and wound healing.

Methods:

Pregnant Wistar rats were divided into two groups during gestation: control (C; ad libitum diet) and undernourished (Und; 60% of control diet). After delivery, the undernourished mothers were reassigned to two subgroups: ad libitum + Impact® (Arg) and ad libitum + Nutren® (Hh). Evaluated parameters included offspring anthropometric measurements, serum albumin, tensile strength, and collagen morphometry at the surgical wound. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s, Student’s t-test, and Fisher’s test.

Results:

Maternal immunonutrition during lactation promoted recovery of offspring weight (C = 29.21 ± 2.86 g; Arg = 36.08 ± 5.38 g; p = 0.0009) and body length (C = 9.87 ± 0.32 cm; Arg = 10.91 ± 0.73 cm; p = 0.0008), shifting values from significantly lower at birth to higher than controls by weaning. Offspring healing parameters showed no significant differences compared with controls.

Conclusion:

An arginine-enriched diet provided to lactating rats malnourished during gestation significantly improved offspring anthropometric growth and supported wound healing following surgery at weaning.

Key words: Fetal Nutrition Disorders, Wound Healing, Arginine

Introduction

Malnutrition accounts for approximately 2.2 million deaths among children under 5 years of age worldwide 1 . In 2020, the World Health Organization reported that 149 million children under 5 were stunted and 45 million were wasted 2 . Among critically ill children, the prevalence of malnutrition is estimated at 37.2% 3 . The concept of the “first 1,000 days” highlights gestation and lactation as critical windows for intervention in childhood malnutrition 4 . Evidence indicates that up to 62% of birth weight variability is attributable to intrauterine conditions 5 .

Since the 1990s, when Barker et al. first linked intrauterine malnutrition to increased cardiovascular risk in adulthood, the issue has been extensively studied 6-9 . Maternal dietary deficiencies have been associated with preterm labor and small-for-gestational-age infants. Both clinical and experimental studies of preconceptional and prenatal malnutrition have demonstrated deleterious effects on the development of multiple organs and systems 10-16 .

The relationship between malnutrition and impaired wound healing has been widely discussed. Collagen synthesis depends directly on the availability of macronutrients such as carbohydrates, lipids and proteins, as well as micronutrients, such as vitamins and trace elements 17-20 . Lipid deprivation compromises cell replication and inflammatory metabolism 21 .

Maternal supplementation to prevent fetal malformations and support development has proven effective, particularly with folic acid and vitamins A and D during gestation 22-25. Arginine supplementation during pregnancy has demonstrated positive effects in reversing intrauterine growth restriction 26-30 . Mateo et al. reported improved weight gain in piglets associated with maternal arginine supplementation during lactation 31 . Arginine is a non-essential amino acid that has several special properties, such as protein synthesis, nitric oxide production, and synthesis of collagen for wound healing.

The aims of this study were: to develop an experimental rodent model of maternal supplementation during lactation in rats undernourished during gestation, and to evaluate the effects of arginine supplementation on neonatal growth and abdominal wall healing.

Methods

The experiment was conducted in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines and was approved by the local Animal Use Committee (protocol no. 23075.082514/2011-68). Five male and 20 female Wistar rats (120–140 days old) were mated at a 4:1 ratio during the dark period in polypropylene cages (46 × 31 × 21 cm). Animals were housed under controlled conditions with constant temperature (22 ± 2°C) and a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The presence of spermatozoa in vaginal smears was used to confirm mating, designating day 1 of pregnancy.

After pregnancy was confirmed, rats were housed individually and assigned to two groups: control group (C), with free access to food and water, and undernutrition group (Und), receiving 60% of the average intake of the control group. Standard pellet chow was provided (Nuvital®, Nuvilab, Brazil), containing 22% protein, 54% carbohydrates, and 20% fat. Maternal body weight was measured daily throughout pregnancy.

After delivery, all mothers were allowed free access to diet, and the undernourished group was further divided into two subgroups: (Arg) supplemented with an arginine-enriched diet (Impact®), and (Hh) supplemented with a hypercaloric-hyperproteic diet (Nutren®). Supplementation was administered daily by gavage, with 5 mL of the respective diet. The diets composition is presented in Table 1, and the daily supplementation for rat is presented in Table 2.

Table 1. Supplementation diets composition for 100 mL.

Impact® Nutren®
Energy (kcal) 107 106
Carbohydrate (g) 14 7.2
Protein (g) 6.5 7.5
L-arginine (mg) 1,400 –
Fats (g) 2.8 5

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Table 2. Daily supplementation for the rats during lactation period.

Group Arg Group Hh
Energy (kcal) 5 5
Carbohydrate (g) 0.7 0.36
Protein (g) 0.325 0.375
L-arginine (mg) 0.7 –
Fats (g) 0.14 0.25

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

During the lactation period, maternal and pup weights were recorded daily. At weaning (day 21 of life), body weight (mothers and pups), as well as body and tail length (pups), was measured. At this stage, all pups underwent a transverse supraumbilical laparotomy followed by abdominal wall closure under anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine. On postoperative day 7, the pups were euthanized by ketamine and xylazine overdose. Approximately 1 mL of blood was collected from the superior vena cava for serum albumin measurement, and abdominal wall healing was assessed by two methods: tensiometry, to determine tensile strength, and histology with picrosirius red staining to quantify type I (mature) and type III (immature) collagen. for the tensiometry analysis, the Emic® model dl-500 instrument was used. A constant traction was applied to both ends of the incision, and the rupture tensile strength was determined. For the collagen studies, the edges of the abdominal wound were resected and stained with picrosirius red. The area stained in red was considered mature collagen (type I), whereas the area stained in green was considered immature collagen (type III). The percentage of each one was determined. The study design is presented in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Study design.

Gestation
21 days
(Rats)
Lactation
21 days
(Rats)
Weaning
21st days
(Pups)
7st posoperative
(Pups)
Control (C)
Ad libitum
Control (C)
Ad libitum
Transverse laparotomy Sacrifice
Undernutrition (Und) -
pair fed
Arg
Arginine-enriched diet
Transverse laparotomy Sacrifice
Hh
Hypercaloric-hyperproteic diet
Transverse laparotomy Sacrifice

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s post hoc test. p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

After a three-day mating period, sperm was detected in the vaginal fluid of 11 out of 20 rats. Three rats were assigned to the control group (C), and eight to the undernutrition group (Und). There was no initial difference in body weight between groups (Table 3), but after five days of undernutrition, study groups showed significant lower body weight (Fig. 2). One undernourished rat failed to deliver, although no bleeding was observed in the cage.

Table 3. Body weight at pregnancy detection and at birth in grams.

Pregnancy At birth
Rats Pups
Control 206.71 ± 11.84 g 323.86 ± 29.17 g* 8.76 ± 0.89 g*
Undernutrition 205.50 ± 26.89 g 248.92 ± 26.89 g 6.80 ± 1.24 g
*

p < 0.05.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 2. Weight gain during gestation (g).

Figure 2

C: control group; Und: undernutrition group. Source: Elaborated by the authors.

At birth, mothers and pups from the undernourished group exhibited significantly lower body weights compared to control group (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Pups birth weight at birth (g).

Figure 3

C: control group; Und: undernutrition group; p < 0.005. Source: Elaborated by the authors.

After weaning, both supplemented groups (Arg and Hh) exhibited significantly greater body weight and length as compared with the control group (C). No significant difference was observed in tail length. Likewise, there were no significant differences in anthropometric measures between the two supplemented groups (Arg and Hh) (Table 4).

Table 4. Pups weight, body and tail length after weaning.

Weight Body length Tail length
Control 29.21 ± 2.86 g* 9.88 ± 0.32 cm* 6.72 ± 0.29 cm
Arginine 36.08 ± 5.38 g 10.91 ± 0.73 cm 7.02 ± 0.59 cm
Hypercaloric 34.66 ± 4.53 g 10.56 ± 0.63 cm 6.93 ± 0.65 cm
*

p < 0.05 compared to groups arginine and hypercaloric.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Postmortem albumin levels were significantly higher in the control group as compared with both supplemented groups (C = 4.55 ± 0.21 g/dL; Arg = 3.75 ± 0.11 g/dL; Hh = 3.62 ± 0.05 g/dL; p < 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5. Pups weight and serum albumin measurement at sacrifice.

Weight Serum albumin
Control 60.88 ± 1.98 g 4.55 ± 0.21 cm*
Arginine 70.24 ± 2.83 g 3.75 ± 0.11 cm
Hypercaloric 57.01 ± 1.83 g 3.62 ± 0.05 cm
*

p < 0.05.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

The first parameter used to evaluate abdominal wall healing, tensiometry, showed that pups from arginine-supplemented dams recovered the tensile strength without significant differences as compared with the control group. In contrast, this recovery was not observed in pups from hypercaloric-supplemented dams (Table 6), which remained significantly lower than controls.

Table 6. Pups abdominal wall tensile strength.

Tensile strength (kgf/cm2)
Control 5.4638 ± 0.301
Arginine 6.0763 ± 0.265
Hypercaloric 3.2889 ± 0.314*
*

p < 0.05.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Histological evaluation of the abdominal wall did not reveal significant differences in the proportions of mature (type I) and immature (type III) collagen fibers among the groups (Table 7).

Table 7. Pups weight and serum albumin measurement at sacrifice.

Total collagen Type I collagen (%) Type II collagen (%)
Control 4,562.78 ± 601.43 47.04 ± 4.88 52.96 ± 4.88
Arginine 3,189.34 ± 508.36 46.76 ± 4.20 53.23 ± 4.19
Hypercaloric 4,849.43 ± 785.33 38.41 ± 3.97 61.58 ± 3.96

*p > 0.05. Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Discussion

Recent data indicate that wasting and stunting remain responsible for approximately 2.2 million deaths in children under 5 years of age worldwide each year2,3. Undernutrition may begin as early as prenatal development, and the concept of the “1,000-day window of opportunity” highlights the importance of nutritional interventions during gestation to improve childhood nutritional outcomes4.

Several experimental models have been described to study intrauterine malnutrition, including hypoproteic, hypocaloric, or combined hypoproteic–hypocaloric regimens 17 . In the present study, a pair-fed regimen with 40% restriction was effective in inducing a malnourished state in pregnant rats.

The deleterious effects of prenatal malnutrition have been well documented since 1992, with studies on survivors of the Dutch famine. Barker et al. reported long-term complications involving the cardiovascular system, as well as carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Based on these findings, multiple studies have demonstrated the negative effects of intrauterine malnutrition on fetal growth and the development of various systems 5-10 .

Coelho-Lemos et al. 17 described a direct relationship between maternal food restriction and low birth weight. Consistent with this, our study confirmed significant weight differences in undernourished rats after the fifth day of pregnancy. Furthermore, the experiment reproduced the detrimental effects on litter birth weight and length, with significant differences between the control and undernourished groups.

Mateo et al. 31 proposed maternal arginine supplementation as a strategy to enhance neonatal piglet weight gain. The central concept of their study was to demonstrate the amino acid’s capacity to stimulate breast milk production and improve neonatal growth.

To our knowledge, the present study is the first one to describe an experimental rat model of maternal arginine supplementation. Maternal arginine use proved effective in stimulating weight and length gain in suckling pups. The “arginine–proline cycle between mother and neonate” described by Mateo et al. 31 proposes that arginine catabolism products act within the mammary gland to improve milk production. Nitric oxide may promote vasodilation and mammary blood flow, while polyamines enhance cellular proliferation and glandular growth 27,28 .

This experiment demonstrated catch-up growth in both weight and length at weaning among pups of rats that were undernourished during pregnancy but received supplementation during lactation. Both supplementation groups, hypercaloric/hyperproteic and arginine-enriched diets, presented significantly greater weight and length than the control group.

Serum albumin levels, a parameter of chronic nutritional status, were assessed one week after weaning. Despite maternal supplementation improving growth recovery, no effect was observed on albumin levels in the pups.

The correlation between adequate nutritional status and efficient wound healing has been extensively documented. Furthermore, immunonutrition through amino acid supplementation has been shown to enhance tissue repair. In this model, pups from arginine-supplemented dams exhibited significant catch-up in wound tensile strength, as well as collagens types I and III concentrations, reaching values comparable to those of the control group.

Conclusion

Supplementation of arginine in lactating dams that had been undernourished during gestation improved weight and length gain in pups exposed to intrauterine malnutrition and enhanced their wound healing capacity.

Acknowledgements

To Universidade Federal do Paraná, Postgraduate Program in Surgery.

Funding Statement

Funding: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Footnotes

Research performed at Postgraduate Program in Surgery, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (PR), Brazil.

Funding: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior https://ror.org/00x0ma614

Declaration of use of artificial intelligence tools: Artificial intelligence tools were used exclusively for final language correction.

Data availability statement.

Data sharing is not applicable.

References

  • 1.Shrimpton R. Global policy and programme guidance on maternal nutrition: what exists, the mechanisms for providing it, and how to improve them? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(suppl.1):315–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Katoch OR. Determinants of malnutrition among children: A systematic review. Nutrition. 2022;96:111565–111565. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abera EG, Sime H. The prevalence of malnutrition among critically ill children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2023;23(1):583–583. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04419-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lutter CK, Lutter R. Fetal and early childhood undernutrition, mortality, and lifelong health. Science. 2012;337(6101):1495–1499. doi: 10.1126/science.1224616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guilloteau P, Zabielski R, Hammon HM, Metges CC. Adverse effects of nutritional programming during prenatal and early postnatal life, some aspects of regulation and potential prevention and treatments. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60(Suppl.3):17–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hales CN, Barker DJ, Clark PM, Cox LJ, Fall C, Osmond C, Winter PD. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ. 1991;303:1019–1019. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hales CN, Barker DJ. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia. 1992;35(7):595–601. doi: 10.1007/BF00400248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fall C. Maternal nutrition: effects on health in the next generation. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(5):593–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barker DJ, Hales CN, Fall CH, Osmond C, Phipps K, Clark PM. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetologia. 1993;36(3):62–67. doi: 10.1007/BF00399095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang LT. Maternal and early-life nutrition and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7982–7982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gomez-Roig MD, Pascal R, Cahuana MJ, Garcia-Algar O, Sebastiani G, Andreu-Fernandez V, Martinez L, Rodrigues G, Iglesia I, Ortiz-Arrabal O, Mesa MD, Cabero MJ, Guerra L, Llurba E, Dominguez C, Zanini MJ, Foraster M, Larque E, Cabanas F, Lopez-Azorin M, Perez A, Loureiro B, Pallas-Alonso CR, Escuder-Vieco D, Vento M. Enviromental exposure during pregnancy: influence on prenatal development and early life: a comprehensive review. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(4):245–257. doi: 10.1159/000514884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li M, Francis E, Hinkle SN, Ajjarapu AS, Zhang C. Preconception and prenatal nutrition and neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1628–1628. doi: 10.3390/nu11071628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Desai M, Gayle DA, Casillas E, Boles J, Ross MG. Early undernutrition attenuates the inflammatory response in adult rat offspring. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(7):571–575. doi: 10.1080/14767050902874105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lanham AS, Bertram C, Cooper C, Oreffo ROC. Animal models of maternal nutrition and altered offspring bone structure – bone development across the lifecourse. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;22:321–332. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v022a24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reusens B, Theys N, Dumortier O, Goosse K, Remacle C. Maternal malnutrition programs the endocrine pancreas in progeny. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(Suppl.6):S1824–S1829. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.000729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Costanzo MD, Paulis ND, Capra ME, Biasucci G. Nutrition during pregnancy and lactation: epigenetics effects on infants’ immune system in food allergy. Nutrients. 2022;14(9):1766–1766. doi: 10.3390/nu14091766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coelho-Lemos ICM, Campos ACL, Almeida M, Schuler SL, Gurmini J, Malafaia O, Andrade DF. In utero malnutrition influences wound healing of newborn rats as measured by tensile strength and collagen deposition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004;28(4):241–245. doi: 10.1177/0148607104028004241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Campos ACL, Groth AK, Branco AB. Assessment and nutritional aspects of wound healing. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11(3):281–288. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3282fbd35a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grada A, Phillips TJ. Nutrition and cutaneous wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2022;40(2):103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Penny H, Flores R, Pennington E, Pederson A, Tran S. The role of macronutrients and micronutrients in wound healing: a narrative review. J Wound Care. 2022;31(Suppl.5):S14–S22. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup5.S14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arribas-Lopez E, Zand N, Ojo O, Snowden MJ, Kochhar T. The effect of amino acids on wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis on arginine and glutamine. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2498–2498. doi: 10.3390/nu13082498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Talebi S, Kianifar HR, Mehdizabeh Nutritional requirements in pregnancy and lactation. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024;64:400–410. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Castillo-Lancellotti C, Tur JA, Uauy R. Impact of folic acid fortification of flour on neural tube defects: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(5):901–911. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wald NJ, Vale SH, Bestwick JP, Morris JK. Blood folate level needed for fully effective fortification in the prevention of neural tube defects. Arch Dis Child. 2025;110(8):651–656. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilson RD, O’Connor DL. Maternal folic acid and multivitamin supplementation: International clinical evidence with considerations for the prevention of folate-sensitive birth defects. Prev Med Rep. 2021;24:101617–101617. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sieroszewski P, Suzin J, Karowicz-Bilinska A. Ultrasound evaluation of intrauterine growth restriction therapy by a nitric oxide donor (L-arginine) J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;15(6):363–366. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001725280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiao XM, Li LP. L-arginine treatment for asymmetric fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88(1):15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu G, Bazer FW, Cudd TA, Meininger CJ, Spencer TE. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J Nutr. 2004;134(9):2169–2172. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Palencia JYP, Lemes MAG, Garbossa CAP, Abreu MLT, Pereira LJ, Zangeronimo MG. Arginine for gestating sows and foetal development; a systematic review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018;102(1):204–213. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cruz FL, Mendes MFSA, Silva TO, Guimarães MB, Filho, Abreu MLT. L-Arginine supplementation for pregnant and lactating sows may improve the performance of piglets: a systematic review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2025;109(1):76–95. doi: 10.1111/jpn.14031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mateo RD, Wu G, Moon HK, Carroll JA, Kim SW. Effects of dietary arginine supplementation during gestation and lactation on the performance of lactating primiparous sows and nursing piglets. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(4):827–835. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira para Desenvolvimento Pesquisa em Cirurgia

RESOURCES