Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2026 Apr 6;31(7):1208. doi: 10.3390/molecules31071208

Evidence of Antiproliferative Activity in the Liverwort Isotachis serrulata from Southern Ecuador

José Miguel Andrade 1,2,*, Ángel Benítez 3, Aday González-Bakker 2, Luis Cartuche 4, José M Padrón 2, Ana R Díaz-Marrero 5,6,*, José J Fernandez 2,6,7,*
Editor: Mª Ángeles Castro
PMCID: PMC13074347  PMID: 41976248

Abstract

Natural products from bryophytes represent an underexplored source of structurally diverse bioactive compounds. In this study, extracts of Isotachis serrulata collected in southern Ecuador were evaluated for antiproliferative activity against five human tumor cell lines. Sequential extraction and chromatographic fractionation yielded six fractions, among which fraction IsF5 displayed the most notable activity, particularly against lung (SW1573) and breast (T-47D) cancer cell lines, with GI50 values within the moderate activity range according to National Cancer Institute criteria. Phytochemical investigation of IsF5 revealed the presence of two glycosylated aromatic constituents, tentatively assigned as tachioside and isotachioside, based on comparative 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic analysis. These compounds were obtained as a mixture and were not evaluated individually due to limited material. Additionally, species distribution modeling using MaxEnt indicated that I. serrulata is primarily associated with humid montane and páramo ecosystems in the southern, central and northern Andes of Ecuador, where elevation and precipitation variables strongly influence its distribution. This study provides the first integrated assessment of the antiproliferative activity, chemical profiling, and ecological distribution of I. serrulata.

Keywords: Isotachis, foliose liverwort, distribution models, antiproliferative

1. Introduction

Natural products remain a major source of bioactive molecules in drug discovery, with many approved drugs and lead compounds derived from natural scaffolds [1,2,3]. However, several taxonomic groups remain poorly explored, limiting the discovery of structurally unique metabolites with potential therapeutic relevance [4]. Among these, bryophytes—comprising mosses, liverworts, and hornworts—are an early-diverging lineage with distinctive ecological adaptations and metabolic capabilities, yet they remain comparatively understudied from phytochemical and pharmacological perspectives despite their wide distribution and ecological significance [5,6].

Among bryophytes, liverworts (Marchantiophyta) are recognized for producing structurally distinctive secondary metabolites, including terpenoids, bibenzyls, bisbibenzyls, and phenolic derivatives that are rarely encountered in higher plants [7,8,9]. Numerous metabolites isolated from liverworts have demonstrated relevant biological activities, including antimicrobial, cytotoxic, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory effects [10,11,12]. More recent comprehensive surveys further document the structural diversity and pharmacological potential of liverwort secondary metabolites across multiple genera [7,13].

In contrast, the genus Isotachis (Balantiopsidaceae), distributed in tropical and subtropical regions including Andean ecosystems of South America [14,15], has received comparatively little attention. Available reports are largely limited to the identification of isolated metabolites, and systematic pharmacological evaluations of Isotachis species remain scarce [16]. Phytochemical studies of the genus Isotachis have reported benzyl cinnamate and benzyl benzoate, as well as phenyl and β-phenylethyl cinnamates [17,18].

In parallel with phytochemical research, species distribution modeling has become an important tool for understanding the ecological and geographical patterns of plant species, particularly in heterogeneous and biodiverse landscapes [19,20]. Such models allow the identification of suitable habitats and provide insights into the environmental factors influencing species occurrence [21]. When integrated with chemical and biological studies, distribution analyses can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of species selection and potential metabolic variability.

In this context, the present study aims to provide the first integrated evaluation of the antiproliferative potential of I. serrulata, using the GI50 parameter (µg/mL) to assess growth inhibition in human cancer cell lines, together with a chemical investigation of its extracts and the chemical profiling and tentative structural assignment of selected secondary metabolites. Additionally, a species distribution model of I. serrulata across southern Ecuador is presented to support the ecological relevance of the species. As far as we are aware, this is the first report combining antiproliferative activity, chemical characterization, and distribution modeling for I. serrulata.

2. Results and Discussion

Dried material of I. serrulata was macerated with ethanol for 8 days at room temperature. After extraction, the ethanolic solution was filtered and concentrated to dryness. The ethanol extract of I. serrulata was initially chromatographed on Sephadex LH-20 giving six sub fractions (Table S2). Fraction IsF2 exhibited the highest yield, accounting for 62.61% of the crude extract, whereas IsF6 showed the lowest value, corresponding to only 0.78%.

From fraction IsF5 (1.78% yield), two glycosylated aromatic constituents were detected and tentatively identified as tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2) based on comparative analysis of their 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data with literature reports (Table S1). Both constituents were present as a mixture in similar relative proportions, as inferred from the relative intensities of diagnostic signals observed in the 1H NMR spectrum.

The 1H NMR spectrum of the mixture displayed characteristic signals attributable to two closely related trisubstituted aromatic systems. Compound 1 showed signals at δH 6.69 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.47 (d, J = 2.7 Hz) and 6.30 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.7 Hz), indicative of a trisubstituted aromatic ring. Its anomeric proton resonated at δH 4.74 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), consistent with a β-linked glucopyranosyl unit, and a methoxy group was observed as a singlet at δH 3.82 [22,23,24,25].

Compound 2 exhibited a similar aromatic proton pattern with resonances at δH 7.01 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.80 (d, J = 2.7 Hz), and 6.58 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.7 Hz) were consistent with a 1,2,4-trisubstituted aromatic ring. An anomeric proton signal at δH 4.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz) indicated the presence of a β-glucopyranosyl moiety, with the coupling constant supporting a β-configuration at the anomeric center. In addition, a methoxy group was evidenced by a singlet at δH 3.80 [22,24,26,27].

The corresponding 13C NMR data further supported the presence of two methoxylated phenyl β-glucosides, showing resonances attributable to aromatic carbons, anomeric carbons, and sugar moieties in agreement with previously reported values for isotachioside and tachioside. Based on these spectroscopic features and literature comparison, the constituents detected in fraction IsF5 were tentatively assigned as tachioside (methoxyhydroquinone-4-β-D-glucopyranoside) (1) and isotachioside (methoxyhydroquinone-1-β-D-glucopyranoside) (2), Figure 1. Both constituents are consistent with data reported in the literature, which explains their similar chromatographic behavior on TLC and silica gel column chromatography. To the best of our knowledge, this appears to represent the first indication of the presence of both compounds in I. serrulata.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical and minimized 3D structures of the glycosylated aromatic constituents inferred in Isotachis serrulata based on comparative 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data: tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2). Schrödinger Release 2024-4: Maestro v. 14.2.118, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA.

The antiproliferative activity of the crude ethanolic extract (IsEx) and its fractions (IsF1–IsF6) obtained from I. serrulata was evaluated against five human tumor cell lines, including A549 and SW1573 (non-small cell lung carcinoma), HBL-100 (mammary gland), HeLa (human cervical carcinoma), and T-47D (breast carcinoma). Cells were exposed to three concentrations of each sample (2.5, 25, and 125 µg/mL).

Antiproliferative effects were expressed as GI50 values in µg/mL, defined as the concentration required to inhibit 50% of cell growth, as summarized in Figure 2. According to the criteria established by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), samples with GI50 values lower than 20 µg/mL are considered active (A), those with GI50 values between 20 and 100 µg/mL are regarded as moderately active (MA), and those with GI50 values higher than 100 µg/mL are considered inactive (IA).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The antiproliferative activity (GI50 µg/mL) of crude extracts and fractions of liverwort Isotachis serrulata.

The crude ethanolic extract (IsEx) of I. serrulata exhibited moderate antiproliferative activity (MA) against all evaluated human tumor cell lines (Figure 2), with GI50 values ranging from 40 to 100 µg/mL. Similarly, fractions IsF1, IsF3, IsF4, IsF5, and IsF6 showed moderate activity across all tested cell lines.

Among the evaluated fractions, IsF5 displayed the most pronounced antiproliferative effects, yielding the lowest GI50 values, particularly against the SW1573 non-small cell lung cancer line (21 µg/mL), as well as the HBL-100 mammary gland (23 µg/mL) and T-47D breast cancer (23 µg/mL) cell lines. In contrast, fraction IsF2, which represented 62.61% yield of the extract, was classified as inactive (IA) against all tested cell lines, with GI50 values ranging from 123 to 125 µg/mL.

Fraction IsF5 was selected for further phytochemical investigation based not only on its comparatively lower GI50 values but also on its simpler and better-resolved TLC profile, which facilitated compound detection and structural analysis. Although IsF6 exhibited moderate antiproliferative activity, its lower yield and more complex chromatographic profile limited additional chemical characterization within the scope of the present study.

Several studies have documented cytotoxic effects of crude liverwort extracts against diverse cancer cell lines [28,29,30,31,32]. Similar antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects have been reported for liverwort-derived metabolites in other genera. For instance, prenylated bibenzyls isolated from Radula apiculata exhibited cytotoxic activity against human cancer cell lines, with reported IC50 values in the low micromolar range [33]. Likewise, bis-bibenzyl compounds obtained from Pellia endiviifolia have shown significant cytotoxic effects against various tumor cell lines, including glioblastoma and leukemia models, with IC50 values typically ranging from approximately 5 to 30 µM [34]. Although direct comparison is not possible due to differences in experimental conditions and activity metrics, these results are consistent with the moderate antiproliferative activity observed for the fractions of I. serrulata in the present study.

According to the criteria established by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), compounds with GI50 values ≤ 20 µg/mL are classified as active. Although none of the evaluated samples fully met this threshold, fraction IsF5 exhibited GI50 values approaching this limit, particularly against the SW1573 cell line. These results suggest that bioactive constituents are enriched within this fraction, indicating that IsF5 warrants further phytochemical investigation and pharmacological evaluation (Figure 2).

In contrast, fraction IsF2 was inactive (GI50 > 100 µg/mL) in all cell lines, indicating the absence or low concentration of antiproliferative constituents in this fraction. This clear distinction demonstrates the importance of fractionation in enhancing the biological activity of plant extracts and isolating specific active compounds. Fractions IsF1, IsF3, IsF4 and IsF6 exhibited moderate antiproliferative effects, with GI50 values between 39 and 76 µg/mL, less potent than IsF5.

Notably, the differential sensitivity observed among the various cell lines, which may be attributed to the intrinsic molecular characteristics of each cancer type. These findings support the need for additional studies aimed at elucidating the mechanism of action, selectivity, and in vivo efficacy of the most active fractions, particularly IsF5. The fraction IsF5 has the most promising antiproliferative profile among all tested fractions, especially against lung and breast derived cell lines. Further research is needed to identify and isolate the active compounds that are responsible for this effect.

The glycosylated aromatic constituents tentatively assigned as tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2) were detected as a mixture in subfraction 5 derived from IsF5, the fraction exhibiting the highest antiproliferative activity against the tested cancer cell lines. It should be noted that the isolated compounds were obtained as a mixture and could not be evaluated individually due to the limited amount of material. Therefore, a direct causal relationship between these constituents and the observed antiproliferative activity cannot be conclusively established. Nevertheless, the enrichment of these metabolites in the most active fraction (IsF5) suggests that they may contribute to the observed biological effects. Further studies involving the isolation of individual compounds and their biological evaluation will be necessary to confirm their specific activity.

The antiproliferative activity of liverwort extracts can be attributed to the presence of compounds such as bibenzyls, terpenoids, and prenylated flavonoids [31]. Although there are no direct reports on the anticancer activity of tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2) themselves, closely related phenolic glycosides and structurally similar compounds have been associated with relevant biological effects. For example, isotachioside and tachioside have been identified among phenolic glycosides in Gentiana and other plant species with notable antioxidant properties, which are often correlated with cytoprotective effects in cellular systems [35]. Additionally, phenylethanoid glycosides—an analogous class of compounds—have been shown to exhibit cytotoxic and antiproliferative actions against various cancer cell lines, as reported for acteoside and plantamajoside in multiple models (including breast and hepatocarcinoma cells) [36]. These findings, while indirect, suggest that the phenolic glycoside scaffold represented by compounds 1 and 2 merits further study in anticancer screens when adequate quantities become available.

From a synthetic perspective, both positional isomers could in principle be accessed through regioselective glycosylation of 2-methoxyhydroquinone derivatives. However, control of regioselectivity and stereochemistry in glycosylation reactions may require specific conditions. Future studies may explore synthetic strategies to obtain enough quantities of individual compounds for detailed biological evaluation and structure–activity relationship analysis.

Species Distribution Modeling

The potential distribution models indicated that I. serrulata is unevenly distributed along the Andean Cordillera of Ecuador, with higher suitability concentrated in the southern and central Andes. In particular, the species was well documented in the provinces of Loja and Zamora Chinchipe, while lower suitability and fewer occurrence records were predicted for the central and northern Andes (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Geographical location and predicted potential distributions model of Isotachis serrulata obtained using MaxEnt models for current climatic conditions.

The suitable habitat of I. serrulata was primarily associated with evergreen montane and lower montane forests of the southeastern Andes, including páramo ecosystems. This pattern is consistent with reports from tropical regions, where the species has been documented growing in montane tropical forests and páramo ecosystems [37,38,39,40]. These habitats are characterized by high humidity and specific climatic conditions that appear to favor the establishment and persistence of the species.

According to the MaxEnt model, elevation (65.2%), precipitation of the warmest quarter (20.7%), precipitation seasonality (8.6%) and mean diurnal range (4.8%) were identified as the most influential environmental variables limiting the potential distribution of I. serrulata in Ecuador. Model performance evaluation yielded an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.911, indicating a good predictive model for I. serrulata.

The predicted potential distribution of I. serrulata along the Ecuadorian Andes follows a pattern consistent with the ecological preferences reported for montane liverwort species, which are strongly associated with humid environments, stable microclimatic conditions, and relatively narrow altitudinal ranges [41,42,43]. The concentration of suitable habitats in the southern, central and northern Andes (e.g., Loja, Zamora Chinchipe, Azuay, Pichincha and Carchi provinces). Accordingly, this agrees with floristic surveys indicating that bryophyte diversity in Ecuador is related with areas with high elevation and precipitation [44,45]. Similar distribution trends have been documented for other Andean liverwort taxa, where precipitation regimes and montane forest continuity play a decisive role in shaping species occurrence [46].

From a modeling perspective, the MaxEnt results highlight precipitation-related variables and elevation as the main limiting factors controlling the distribution of I. serrulata, a pattern frequently observed in ecological niche models of bryophytes and other plant species [47,48]. Precipitation seasonality and moisture availability related to elevation have been identified as key drivers influencing liverwort establishment, survival, and distribution [49]. The high AUC value obtained (0.867) indicates good model performance and is comparable to values reported in previous MaxEnt-based studies focusing on bryophyte and fern species in mountainous tropical regions [50,51,52]. This pattern is corroborated by the omission rate curve for I. serrulata, which closely follows the expected omission line (Figure 4), indicating good model calibration and robust predictive performance. The red line represents the mean predicted area, the black line corresponds to the predicted omission rate, and the light blue line indicates the omission rates for the training samples. These results support the robustness of the model and reinforce its usefulness for guiding future field surveys, conservation planning, and biogeographical studies of poorly documented liverwort species in the Andes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Omission rates versus predicted area for Isotachis serrulata obtained using MaxEnt models for current climatic conditions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Study Area

Isotachis serrulata (Figure 5) was collected in southern Ecuador in October 2025, in montane Andean ecosystems characterized by humid climatic conditions Sampling sites were located at Zamora Chinchipe province (3°59′24″ S, 79°6′0″ W) at 2271 m a.s.l.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Representative photograph of Isotachis serrulata collected from its natural habitat in southern Ecuador.

The plant material was taxonomically identified by curator of bryophytes and lichens at the HUPL Herbarium, and a voucher specimen (No. AB-1339) was deposited in the herbarium of the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (HUTPL)-Bryophytes and lichen collection, Ecuador. These occurrence records were subsequently used for species distribution modeling analyses.

3.2. Extraction and Fractionation Procedures

Plant material free of visible impurities was dried in a forced-air dehydrator at 30 °C for 48 h prior to extraction. The dried material of I. serrulata (680 g) was crushed and subjected to static maceration with ethanol (EtOH, 5 L) for 8 days at room temperature, with manual agitation twice daily.

After extraction, the ethanolic solution was filtered and concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Büchi R-210, Flawil, Switzerland), yielding the crude ethanolic extract (13.28 g; 1.95% w/w).

An aliquot of the crude ethanolic extract (1.2 g) was dissolved in methanol (MeOH) and centrifuged at room temperature at 3500 rpm for 10 min [53]. The resulting supernatant was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column (2.5 × 150 cm) and eluted with MeOH (100%), affording 27 fractions. Based on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis, these fractions were combined into six pooled fractions (IsF1–IsF6). All fractions were weighed and stored at −20 °C for subsequent analyses [54,55].

Fraction IsF5 (21.30 mg) was subjected to further separation by open-column chromatography on silica gel (Si-G60, 70–230 mesh; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Elution with a mixture of ethyl acetate and methanol (8:2, v/v) afforded 36 subfractions, which were monitored by TLC and combined into five pooled fractions. Among them, pooled fraction 5 yielded a mixture enriched in two glycosylated aromatic constituents, tentatively identified as tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2) (Figure 1), present in approximately similar relative proportions as inferred from the relative intensities of diagnostic signals in the 1H NMR spectrum and by comparison of their 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data with literature reports. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 600 MHz spectrometer equipped (Billerica, MA, USA) with a 5 mm TCI inverse detection cryoprobe. Samples were dissolved in MeOD, and chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual solvent signals (δH 3.31 and δC 49.0 ppm). Standard Bruker pulse sequences were employed for all NMR experiments.

Tachioside (Methoxyhydroquinone-4-β-D-glucopyranoside) (1): 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δH 6.69 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-6), 6.47 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, H-3), 6.30 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.7 Hz, H-5), 3.82 (s, 3H, –OMe), 4.74 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-1′), 3.85 (dd, J = 12.0, 2.1 Hz, H-6′), 3.67 (m, H-6′), 3.32–3.46 (m, 4H, H-2′–H-5′). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δC 151.41 (C-4), 147.88 (C-2), 141.52 (C-1), 114.65 (C-6), 108.60 (C-5), 102.34 (C-1′), 102.43 (C-3), 76.74 (C-3′), 76.39 (C-5′), 73.59 (C-2′), 70.16 (C-4′), 61.23 (C-6′), 55.04 (–OMe) (Figures S1–S4).

Isotachioside (Methoxyhydroquinone-1-β-D-glucopyranoside) (2): 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δH 7.01 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-6), 6.80 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, H-3), 6.58 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.7 Hz, H-5), 3.80 (s, 3H, –OMe), 4.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-1′), 3.89 (dd, J = 12.0, 2.1 Hz, H-6′), 3.70 (m, H-6′), 3.32–3.46 (m, 4H, H-2′–H-5′). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δC 153.47 (C-4), 150.58 (C-2), 139.65 (C-1), 119.07 (C-6), 106.28 (C-5), 102.88 (C-1′), 100.46 (C-3), 76.69 (C-3′), 76.61 (C-5′), 73.65 (C-2′), 69.97 (C-4′), 61.13 (C-6′), 55.19 (–OMe) (Figures S1–S4).

3.3. Species Distribution Modeling

A total of 14 geographical occurrence records of I. serrulata (Table S3) were compiled from published literature and biodiversity databases, including the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; accessed on 20 July 2025) [56] and the HUTPL herbarium.

Nineteen bioclimatic variables were obtained from the WorldClim database (accessed on 20 July 2025) [57] and used as environmental predictors for species distribution modeling. Collinearity among the 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim and elevation was evaluated using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Variables with VIF > 10 were excluded, resulting in seven variables retained for modeling: Mean diurnal range (BIO2), isothermality (BIO3), mean temperature of wettest quarter (BIO8), precipitation of wettest month (BIO13), precipitation of driest month (BIO14), precipitation seasonality (BIO15) and precipitation of warmest quarter (BIO18).

Species distribution modeling was performed using the Maximum Entropy algorithm implemented in MaxEnt software version 3.4.4., with 10 replicate runs to improve model robustness. For model calibration, 75% of the occurrence records were randomly selected as training data, while the remaining 25% were used for model validation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). According to established criteria, AUC values below 0.7 indicate poor model performance, values between 0.7 and 0.8 indicate fair performance, values between 0.8 and 0.9 indicate good performance, and values above 0.9 indicate excellent predictive ability. The continuous habitat suitability output from MaxEnt (0–1) was rescaled to percentages and classified into four suitability classes: 0–25% (Unsuitable habitat) 25–50% (low suitability habitat), 50–75% (Moderate suitability habitat) and 75–100% (High suitability habitat)

3.4. Cancer Cell Growth Inhibition Assay

Cell lines: Cell used in this study were purchased from the ATCC or were donated to the group by partner institutions. For general purpose screening, we use the following human solid tumor cell lines: A549 and SW1573 (non-small cell lung), HBL-100 (Mammary gland), T-47D (breast), and HeLa (human cervical).

Cell culture: Cells grow in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% FBS and 2 mM glutamine. Incubation takes place at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity.

Samples for testing: The samples are resuspended in the appropriate volume of DMSO. The maximum concentration of stock solution is 10 mg/mL. If the amount of sample provided is not enough, diluted stock solutions are prepared. In any case, the maximum test concentration (Cmax) was 125 μg/mL.

Antiproliferative assay: The test follows our implementation of the NCI-60 protocol [58]. The maximum test dose is Cmax and exposure time is 48 h. The results of the three dose assays were reported as GI50 (concentration required for 50% inhibition of cell growth). The assay results for the extract and fractions screened were separated into three categories: A, activity (GI50 < 20 μg/mL); MA, moderately active (20 ≤ GI50 ≤ 100 μg/mL); IA, inactive (GI50 > 100 μg/mL) [59]. GI50 values are for comparative prioritization of complex mixtures during primary screening.

4. Conclusions

This study presents an integrated chemical, biological, and biogeographical assessment of the liverwort I. serrulata from southern Ecuador. The ethanolic extract and its fractions showed moderate antiproliferative activity, with fraction IsF5 displaying the strongest effects, particularly against lung and breast cancer cell lines.

Phytochemical analysis of IsF5 led to the identification of two glycosylated aromatic compounds, tachioside (1) and isotachioside (2), reported for the first time in this species. These compounds were obtained as a mixture and could not be evaluated individually due to limited material; therefore, their specific contribution to the observed antiproliferative activity could not be established.

Ecological niche modeling indicated that the distribution of I. serrulata in Ecuador is mainly influenced by precipitation and elevation, with suitable habitats located in the northern, central and southern Andes. The performance of the MaxEnt model supports its potential usefulness for future field surveys, conservation, and bioprospecting efforts.

Overall, this work highlights the relevance of I. serrulata as an underexplored species combining phytochemical characterization, biological evaluation, and ecological modeling. The results should be considered preliminary, and further studies are required to isolate individual metabolites, evaluate their biological activity, and clarify possible structure–activity relationships.

Acknowledgments

All the authors would like to thank the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) for supporting this open-access publication. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. A.G.-B. thanks the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC) de Santa Cruz de Tenerife for predoctoral grant PRDTF233958GONZ.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31071208/s1, Table S1: Comparison of selected 1H and 13C NMR data obtained from the mixture detected in subfraction 5 of IsF5 (MeOD) with literature values reported for tachioside and isotachioside; Table S2: The antiproliferative activity of crude ethanolic extract and fractions of liverwort Isotachis serrulata against human cancer cell lines; Table S3: Occurrence records of Isotachis serrulata used for species distribution modeling; Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, MeOD) of the mixture obtained from subfraction 5 of IsF5 containing tachioside and isotachioside; Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum (126 MHz, MeOD) of the mixture obtained from subfraction 5 of IsF5 containing tachioside and isotachioside; Figure S3: HSQC spectrum (MeOD) of the mixture obtained from subfraction 5 of IsF5, showing distinct anomeric and aromatic 1H–13C correlations consistent with the presence of two glycosylated aromatic constituents; Figure S4: HMBC spectrum (MeOD) of the mixture obtained from subfraction 5 of IsF5, showing long-range correlations supporting the differentiation of two aromatic glucosides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.M.A., L.C. and Á.B.; Methodology: J.M.A., L.C. and J.J.F.; Investigation: J.M.A., L.C., Á.B., A.G.-B. and J.M.P., Data curation: L.C. and Á.B.; Spectroscopic analysis and compound identification: L.C., J.M.A., A.R.D.-M. and J.J.F.; Biological assays and analysis: A.G.-B. and J.M.P.; Writing—original draft preparation: L.C. and J.M.A.; Writing—review and editing: J.M.P., A.R.D.-M. and J.J.F.; Supervision: A.R.D.-M. and J.J.F.; Project administration: A.R.D.-M. and J.J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction to the supplemental data. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Gobierno de Canarias: PROMOTUR Turismo de Canarias (Actuaciones de Cohesión de Destino Canarias Ecoínsulas II), specifically the project “Islas Canarias, naturaleza marina singular: Salud y bienestar” (PROMOTUR_SP3), and ProID2024010033 (BIMICMAR), co-funded by EU. Spanish Government (Project PID2021-123059OB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020;83:770–803. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Atanasov A.G., Zotchev S.B., Dirsch V.M., Supuran C.T. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021;20:200–216. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Harvey A.L., Edrada-Ebel R., Quinn R.J. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;14:111–129. doi: 10.1038/nrd4510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodrigues T., Reker D., Schneider P., Schneider G. Counting on Natural Products for Drug Design. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:531–541. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glime J.M. Bryophyte Ecology. Michigan Technological University; Houghton, MI, USA: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Asakawa Y. Biologically Active Compounds from Bryophytes. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007;79:557–580. doi: 10.1351/pac200779040557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Asakawa Y., Ludwiczuk A., Nagashima F. Chemical Constituents of Bryophytes: Bio- and Chemical Diversity, Biological Activity, and Chemosystematics. Volume 95. Springer; Vienna, Austria: 2013. pp. 1–796. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ludwiczuk A., Asakawa Y. Bryophytes as a Source of Bioactive Volatile Terpenoids—A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;132:110649. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toyota M., Asakawa Y. Comprehensive Natural Products II. Volume 3. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2010. Chemistry of Liverworts; pp. 287–335. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asakawa Y., Ludwiczuk A. Chemical Constituents of Bryophytes: Structures and Biological Activity. J. Nat. Prod. 2018;81:641–660. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asakawa Y. Liverworts—Potential source of medicinal compounds. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008;14:3067–3088. doi: 10.2174/138161208786404272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asakawa Y., Ludwiczuk A., Nagashima F. Phytochemical and biological studies of bryophytes. Phytochemistry. 2013;91:52–80. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nowaczyński F., Nicoletti R., Zimowska B., Ludwiczuk A. Marchantia polymorpha as a Source of Biologically Active Compounds. Molecules. 2025;30:558. doi: 10.3390/molecules30030558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gradstein S.R., da Costa D.P. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Volume 87. New York Botanical Garden Press; New York, NY, USA: 2003. pp. 1–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gradstein S.R., Churchill S.P., Salazar-Allen N. Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. New York Botanical Garden Press; New York, NY, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Asakawa Y., Toyota M., Nakaishi E., Taka Y. Distribution of Terpenoids and Aromatic Compounds in the Liverworts Isotachis species. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 1997;83:257–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asakawa Y. Chemosystematics of the Hepaticae. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:623–669. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ludwiczuk A., Asakawa Y. Fingerprinting of secondary metabolites of liverworts: Chemosystematic approach. J. AOAC Int. 2014;97:1234–1243. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.SGELudwiczuk. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009;40:677–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Schapire R.E. Maximum Entropy Modeling of Species Geographic Distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006;190:231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guisan A., Thuiller W., Zimmermann N.E. Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Trung B.V., Thi Thao D., Anh D.H., Van Kiem P., Viet P.H. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity of phenyl glycosides isolated from Heliciopsis lobata. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020;15:1934578X20946255. doi: 10.1177/1934578X20946255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thomasi S.S., de Benedicto D.F.C., da Conceição Alves T., Bellete B.S., Venâncio T., de Andrade Mattietto R., Ferreira A.G. Chemical constituents of açai berry pulp (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) by LC-UV-BPSU/NMR and LC-UV-SPE/NMR. Nat. Prod. Res. 2025;39:4317–4324. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2024.2338805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li T., Park M.H., Kim M.J., Ryu B.M., Kim M.J., Moon G.S. Tachioside, an antioxidative phenolic glycoside from bamboo species. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2008;17:1376–1378. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yoshimura M., Ochi K., Sekiya H., Tamai E., Maki J., Tada A., Sugimoto N., Akiyama H., Amakura Y. Identification of characteristic phenolic constituents in Mousouchiku extract used as food additive. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2017;65:878–882. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c17-00401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Asakawa Y., Toyota M., Harrison L.J. Isotachin A and isotachin B, two sulphur-containing acrylates from the liverwort Isotachis japonica. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:1505–1508. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81055-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhong X.-N., Otsuka H., Ide T., Hirata E., Takeda Y. Hydroquinone diglycoside acyl esters from the leaves of Myrsine seguinii. Phytochemistry. 1999;52:923–927. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00334-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guo L., Wu J.-Z., Han T., Cao T., Rahman K., Qin L.-P. Chemical composition, antifungal and antitumor properties of ether extracts of Scapania verrucosa Heeg. and its endophytic fungus Chaetomium fusiforme. Molecules. 2008;13:2114–2125. doi: 10.3390/molecules13092114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tonguç Yayıntaş Ö., Yılmaz S., Sökmen M. Determination of antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor activity of bryophytes from Mount Ida (Canakkale, Turkey) Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2019;18:395–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou F., Aipire A., Xia L., Halike X., Yuan P., Sulayman M., Wang W., Li J. Marchantia polymorpha L. ethanol extract induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via intrinsic- and endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated pathways. Chin. Med. 2021;16:94. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00504-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dey A., Mukherjee A. Therapeutic potential of bryophytes and derived compounds against cancer. J. Acute Dis. 2015;4:236–248. doi: 10.1016/j.joad.2015.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vergoten G., Bailly C. The Plagiochilins from Plagiochila Liverworts: Binding to α-Tubulin and Drug Design Perspectives. AppliedChem. 2023;3:217–228. doi: 10.3390/appliedchem3020014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang C.Y., Gao Y., Zhou J.C., Xu Z.J., Qiao Y.N., Zhang J.Z., Lou H.X. Diverse prenylated bibenzyl enantiomers from the Chinese liverwort Radula apiculata and their cytotoxic activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2021;84:1459–1468. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c01264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ivković I., Novaković M., Veljić M., Mojsin M., Stevanović M., Marin P.D., Bukvički D. Bis-Bibenzyls from the Liverwort Pellia endiviifolia and Their Biological Activity. Plants. 2021;10:1063. doi: 10.3390/plants10061063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Budzianowska A., Totoń E., Romaniuk-Drapała A., Kikowska M., Budzianowski J. Cytotoxic Effect of Phenylethanoid Glycosides Isolated from Plantago lanceolata L. Life. 2023;13:556. doi: 10.3390/life13020556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu L., Georgiev M.I., Cao H., Nahar L., El-Seedi H.R., Sarker S.D., Xiao J., Lu B. Therapeutic potential of phenylethanoid glycosides: A systematic review. Med. Res. Rev. 2020;40:2605–2649. doi: 10.1002/med.21717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aponte-Rojas A.M., Villanueva-Tamayo B., Clavijo-Romero L.V. Checklist of the bryophytes of Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. [(accessed on 7 November 2025)];Hacquetia. 2025 24:1–18. Available online: https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/hacquetia/article/view/13917. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Campos-Salazar L.V., Uribe-M J. Taxonomic revision of Balantiopsaceae (Marchantiophyta) of Colombia. Nova Hedwig. 2012;94:97–127. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0094-0097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salinas P., Mazón M., Carrión-Paladines V., Cumbicus N., Guzmán P., Giordani P., Benítez Á. Influence of soil and elevation on roadside cryptogam diversity in the tropical Andes. For. Ecosyst. 2022;9:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fuertes E., Prada C. Aportaciones a la brioflora neotropical de la Argentina: Hepáticas foliosas (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta) Bot. Complut. 2020;44:61–72. doi: 10.5209/bocm.71646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gradstein S.R. The Liverworts and Hornworts of Colombia and Ecuador. New York Botanical Garden Press; New York, NY, USA: 2021. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vanderpoorten A., Goffinet B. Introduction to Bryophytes. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gradstein S.R., León-Yánez S. Liverwort diversity in Polylepis pauta forests of Ecuador under different climatic conditions. Neotrop. Biodivers. 2020;6:138–146. doi: 10.1080/23766808.2020.1809273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yangua-Solano E., Carrión-Paladines V., Benítez Á. Effects of fire on pyrodiversity of terricolous non-tracheophyte photoautotrophs in a páramo of southern Ecuador. Diversity. 2023;15:1176. doi: 10.3390/d15121176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mandl N., Lehnert M., Kessler M., Gradstein S.R. A comparison of alpha and beta diversity patterns of ferns, bryophytes and macrolichens in tropical montane forests of southern Ecuador. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010;19:2359–2369. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9839-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang J., Qian H., Dai Z., Zhang J., Kessler M. Geographic and ecological effects on species richness of liverworts worldwide. Ecography. 2025;2025:e07277. doi: 10.1111/ecog.07277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fialová L., Plášek V., Klichowska E., Guo S., Nobis M. Temperature and precipitation more than tree cover affect the distribution patterns of epiphytic mosses within the Orthotrichaceae family in China and adjacent areas. Plants. 2023;12:222. doi: 10.3390/plants12010222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006;29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maul K., Wei Y.M., Iskandar E.A.P., Chantanaorrapint S., Ho B.C., Quandt D., Kessler M. Liverworts show a globally consistent mid-elevation richness peak. Ecol. Evol. 2023;13:e9862. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kruijer H., Raes N., Stech M. Modelling the distribution of the moss species Hypopterygium tamarisci (Hypopterygiaceae, Bryophyta) in Central and South America. Nova Hedwigia. 2010;91:399–414. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2010/0091-0399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lombo-Sanchez Y.J., Suarez-Contento K.Y., Silva M.P.P., Pôrto K.C. An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country—Colombia. Biodivers. Conserv. 2024;33:3781–3797. doi: 10.1007/s10531-024-02926-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Burneo M., Benítez Á. Distribución potencial y áreas prioritarias para la conservación de briófitos en Ecuador. [(accessed on 7 November 2025)];Bosques Latid. Cero. 2020 10:1–13. Available online: https://revistas.unl.edu.ec/index.php/bosques/article/view/713. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Santana Á.L., Peterson J., Perumal R., Joo Y.H., Lee S.H., Siliveru K., Smolensky D. High-molecular-weight polyphenols from Sorghum bicolor retain higher glycation inhibition and cancer cell inhibition in vitro compared to small-molecular-weight polyphenols after separation using Sephadex LH-20. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2025;5:1010–1023. doi: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tian Y., Liimatainen J., Puganen A., Alakomi H.-L., Sinkkonen J., Yang B. Sephadex LH-20 fractionation and bioactivities of phenolic compounds from extracts of Finnish berry plants. Food Res. Int. 2018;113:115–130. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Susanti I., Pratiwi R., Rosandi Y., Hasanah A.N. Separation methods of phenolic compounds from plant extract as antioxidant agents candidate. Plants. 2024;13:965. doi: 10.3390/plants13070965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) GBIF Occurrence Download. [(accessed on 20 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.gbif.org.
  • 57.Fick S.E., Hijmans R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017;37:4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.National Cancer Institute (NCI) NCI-60 Human Tumor Cell Lines Screen. [(accessed on 15 January 2026)]; Available online: https://dtp.cancer.gov/discovery_development/nci-60/
  • 59.Manosroi A., Akazawa H., Pattamapun K., Kitdamrongtham W., Akihisa T., Manosroi W., Manosroi J. Potent antiproliferative effects against oral and cervical cancers of Thai medicinal plants selected from the Thai/Lanna medicinal plant recipe database “MANOSROI III”. Pharm. Biol. 2015;53:1075–1081. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.959613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES