Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Apr 13;21(4):e0346049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346049

“It Feels Like My Spine is About to Break”: Experience and support needs of family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in Ethiopia

Melkitu Melak 1,*, Solomon Mekonnen 2, Afolasade Fakolade 1, Beata Batorowicz 1
Editor: Taiwo Opeyemi Aremu3
PMCID: PMC13075699  PMID: 41973687

Abstract

Background

Due to the complex and long-term care needs of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), caregivers often face an overwhelming caregiving burden, and they experience physical and psychological strain. Few studies in Sub-Saharan Africa have indicated that caregivers face financial difficulties and limited access to formal support services. However, evidence is scarce in Ethiopia.

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the caregiving experiences and support needs of family caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia.

Method

An exploratory descriptive qualitative design was used in this study. A purposeful sampling method was employed to identify and select 13 family caregivers of children with CP. Face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth individual interview was used to collect data. The interview was conducted in the local language, Amharic. The audio data were transcribed verbatim manually and imported to NVivo version 14 software for analysis. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results

Four themes were identified: the emotional journey of caregivers, daily caregiving demands, impact of caregiving, and support systems and support needs. Caregiving for children with CP negatively affected the emotional, physical and social well-being of caregivers. Caregivers indicated a need for financial support, psychological support, adequate healthcare service, access to assistive devices, and education for their children with CP.

Conclusion

The findings emphasize the urgent need for interventions that address the financial vulnerabilities of caregivers, provide targeted psychosocial support, and enhance access to healthcare, assistive devices and education for children with CP.

Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common developmental disabilities, having been recognized as a distinct clinical condition since the mid-19th century [1]. According to Rosenbaum et al. (2007), CP is characterized by permanent movement and posture disorders resulting from non-progressive disturbances in the developing brain, leading to activity limitations and participation restrictions [2].

The global incidence of CP is approximately 1 in 500 births, with an estimated 18 million individuals affected worldwide [3]. In High-Income Countries (HICs), the prevalence rate of CP is about 1.6 per 1,000 live births, while in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), the rate is between 3 and 3.4 per 1,000 live births [4,5]. A study of the Global LMICs CP register indicated that 79.2% of children with CP had spastic CP, with 73.3% classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels III-V, which indicates moderate to severe CP [6]. In Ethiopia, hospital-based data from Addis Ababa indicate that 60.4% of children with CP have spastic quadriplegia, often accompanied by speech difficulties (95.4%), cognitive impairments (87.4%), epilepsy (60.9%), and sensory impairments [7]. However, national-level data on CP prevalence in Ethiopia remain unavailable due to the absence of a CP registry or surveillance system, although it is known that 17.6% of the country’s population lives with a disability [8].

CP often necessitate long-term care beyond the typical needs of children without disabilities, placing a considerable burden on family caregivers, particularly mothers, who typically provide day-to-day support [9]. Evidence showed that the most significant predictors of caregiver burden were the duration of caregiving and the level of care recipient dependency [10,11]. Caregivers of children with CP in Turkey were found to spend an average of 15 hours per day on caregiving activities [12], and caregivers in Ethiopia spend 21.3 hours per day on caregiving activities [13]. As the child with CP gets older and heavier, the physical demands on caregivers also increase [14]. Furthermore, mothers of children with CP with higher scores on the GMFCS tend to spend more time on caregiving than mothers of children with lower GMFCS scores [15]. These caregivers also experience higher levels of stress due to increased caregiving demands, health concerns, and potential developmental delays.

Evidence mainly from HICs indicated the burden of caregiving faced by mothers of children with CP, who often experience physical pain, emotional and psychological strain [1619]. These adverse outcomes of caregiving are exacerbated in the absence of support [20]. Support enables caregivers to provide necessary care at home and helps them function effectively [21], and in HICs, caregivers often have access to formal support systems that are tailored to their specific needs and goals [22,23]. Although family caregiving can be challenging, it also offers rewards such as a deep sense of fulfillment and satisfaction. In line with this, caregivers of children with CP from Australia, United States of America (USA) and United Kingdom (UK) reported feelings of personal growth, strengthened social networks, a heightened sense of purpose, and a deepened sense of meaning in life, which enhance their overall quality of life [24,25].

Studies in LMICs also showed that mothers of children with CP frequently experience physical health issues such as headaches and backaches, as well as psychological conditions like stress, anxiety, and depression [26,27]. Economic hardship, limited access to formal support services such as respite care, and inadequate infrastructure for accessible transportation are common concerns highlighted in research from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [14,2831]. Moreover, societal attitudes such as social stigma and discrimination were also reported to contribute to the psychosocial challenges caregivers face [32]. Disability is often misunderstood or associated with superstition in many African communities, leading to social isolation and reduced community support [33]. Caregivers frequently reported feelings of guilt, helplessness, and overwhelming concern about their children’s future due to the lack of societal understanding of CP [30,34]. This isolation, combined with the physical and emotional demands of caregiving, can contribute to significant mental health burdens, such as anxiety, depression, chronic stress, and even suicidal ideation [35], especially when there is a lack of support [36,37].

A recent scoping review on the health outcomes and support needs of caregivers of children with CP in SSA highlighted a lack of research from Ethiopia, despite a growing body of evidence in the region [38]. While previous studies from other countries could provide some insight, the unique socio-cultural and economic factors, such as the spiritual and collectivist nature of Ethiopian society [39], multidimensional poverty [40], and community members negative attitude towards children with disability [41] might influence the caregiving experience differently. Moreover, in Ethiopia, there is limited availability and accessibility of disability support systems, including community-based and specialized rehabilitation services, and healthcare services [42,43], educational services for children with disability [33,44], lack of disability or caregiver benefits [33], and day care and respite care services [45,46]. These challenges were linked by researchers to increased physical, financial and emotional demands of caregiving and were found to negatively impact the overall wellbeing of caregivers [13,47]. To address the existing knowledge gap related to Ethiopia’s context, the current study explored the caregiving experiences and support needs of family caregivers for children with CP in Ethiopia. Such a study is needed to provide a foundational evidence base to inform future research, as well as give insight into the design of relevant policies and support interventions tailored to the specific needs and realities of caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study design

This work is part of a PhD research project of the first author under the supervision of the last author. In this study, an exploratory descriptive qualitative approach was used, which is recommended when little is known about the phenomenon [48]. The experience and support needs of family caregivers of children with CP have received little attention in the Ethiopian context; as a result, we adopted an exploratory descriptive qualitative approach to gain authentic insight into the experiences of family caregivers.

Study setting

To better understand the experiences and support needs of caregivers of children with CP, it is vital to understand the social, cultural, and health system context of Ethiopia. Ethiopia is the second most populated country in Africa and the 10th largest in the world, with a population of 132,938,555 in 2025 [49]. According to the 2007 census, 83.6% of Ethiopia’s population resides in rural areas. Ethiopia has the fastest-growing economy, yet it remains one of the poorest countries, with a per capita gross national income of $1,020 [49].

Ethiopia is an uncolonized country and has a rich and unique cultural heritage. In the Ethiopian context, culture and religion promote altruism and support for others as a fulfillment of religious or spiritual obligations, which in turn influence societal practices [39]. Women and girls often assume caregiving responsibilities within family settings. Mothers are traditionally expected to be the primary caregivers and household caretakers [50], and there is a high cultural expectation for mothers to care for children with disabilities at home. However, the stigma surrounding disability is widespread in Ethiopia, where it is often viewed as a divine punishment or a curse from ancestors or the result of evil spirits [51,52]. Spiritual healing practices like “Holy Water” are vital for many Ethiopians who follow the Christian faith, especially those suffering from chronic health issues.

The study was conducted in Gondar, located in the Amhara Region, northwest Ethiopia, approximately 745 km from the capital, Addis Ababa. Gondar is situated in the foothills of the north mountain chains at an average elevation of 2,300 meters above sea level, characterized by its mountainous topography. It was a royal capital city, which is now rich in Orthodox Christian heritage, and a cultural hub in the Amhara region. At the commencement of this study, there was civil war in the Amhara region, including Gondar and its surrounding areas. The instability of the situation and related safety issues made it difficult to recruit participants from rural areas.

Since 2010, Ethiopia’s health service delivery has been structured into three tiers, providing primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of healthcare [53]. The primary level of healthcare unit includes health posts, health centers and primary hospitals. Health posts health service delivery is at the very bottom level of an administrative unit called a “kebele,” serving approximately 5,000 people. Five satellite health posts are attached to a referral health center, providing services to approximately 25,000 people, which deliver promotive, preventive and basic curative services. A primary hospital provides emergency surgical services, as well as inpatient and ambulatory services, to an average population of 100,000, and serves as a referral center for health centers. At the secondary level of the healthcare system, a general hospital serves as a referral centre for primary hospitals and serves about 1–1.5 million people at the district level. At the tertiary level, a specialized hospital is a referral centre for general hospitals and serves 3.5–5 million people at the regional and central levels. Most healthcare services are funded through out-of-pocket payments [53,54].

World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrating medical rehabilitation services across all levels of the healthcare system, particularly at the primary healthcare level [55]. However, in Ethiopia, the integrated rehabilitation services are scarce and primarily limited to the tertiary level of the healthcare system, mainly providing physiotherapy services [56]. Affordability and transportation were found to be common barriers to accessing medical rehabilitation services among people with disabilities in Ethiopia [40]. Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) was first launched by WHO as a strategy to increase access to rehabilitation services at the community level for persons with disability [55]. The University of Gondar (UoG) CBR program is the only community-based rehabilitation program serving Gondar City and its 14 surrounding districts. It was established in 2005 in partnership with Light for the World and Save the Children International. It provides home-based physical rehabilitation, assistive devices and referral to advanced medical care services for persons with disabilities (https://uog.edu.et/cbr/).

Study participants and recruitment

Study participants were family caregivers of children with CP in Gondar. We employed purposeful sampling to identify and select participants, considering the age of the child and the severity of CP to capture and describe the phenomenon in various situations [57]. Family caregivers were included if the following criteria were fulfilled: (a) primary family caregiver aged ≥18 who provided most of the care in a day for the child with CP aged <18 years, (b) speaks the local language, Amharic, (c) providing care for a child with CP with GMFCS levels IV or V (indicating severe forms of CP), and (d) willing to participate in the study. First, we recruited 15 caregivers of children with CP from the UoG CBR logbook. However, two of those caregivers did not meet the criteria because their children did not have severe CP (i.e., GMFCS level IV and V), and they did not take part in the study. Caregivers who were recruited for the study were contacted by CBR field workers to inquire about their willingness to participate in the research.

Consistent with an exploratory, descriptive, qualitative approach, sample size adequacy was guided by the concept of information power which indicates the more information the sample holds relevant for the study, the fewer participants is needed [58,59]. The size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on five factors: (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy [59]. For the current study, the aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the caregiving experience of family caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia, sample included only primary family caregivers of children with severe CP, the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome guided the study [20], and the method of analysis was a thematic cross-case approach [59]. To enhance the quality of dialogue during data collection, participants were selected purposively, considering their ability to articulate independent ideas in Amharic language. Therefore, the aim of the study was narrow, samples were specific, conceptual framework was used, and quality dialogue was achieved between the interviewer and the caregivers which all indicated that a small sample size is needed for our study. We decided to stop at 13 participants, as the data we obtained were rich and sufficient to answer our research question.

Data collection

Data collection took place at a newly opened daycare center for children with disabilities, a familiar place for family caregivers, from mid-March to May 2024. First, prior to the commencement of the interview, the interviewer completed a background questionnaire to gather information on sociodemographic characteristics, including age, sex, relationship with the child, ethnicity, residence, educational status, employment status, marital status, and child characteristics. GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS tools were used to classify the functional ability of children with CP as perceived by caregivers while guiding them on the meaning of each level. Then, face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews were conducted in Amharic, the local language. Each interview was audio recorded, with an average length of 40.5 minutes, ranging between 28 and 53 minutes. The interview guide was developed based on the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome, developed by Raina et al. (2004), which provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between various factors that influence the caregiving experience. This model highlights how background/contextual factors (e.g., socioeconomic status), caregiver strain, intrapsychic factors and coping factors interact to affect caregiver outcomes such as physical and psychological health. The model informed the development of the interview guide, helping us identify key areas to explore, including caregivers’ day-to-day experiences, challenges, coping strategies, available support systems, and the broader contextual influences on caregiving [20]. The interviewer was a local female sociologist with extensive experience in qualitative research. A three-hour training session was conducted by the first author (MM) for the data collector, covering the study’s aims, interview guide, procedures, and ethical guidelines. The data collector began the conversation with each participant by providing a brief overview of the study’s purpose. Next, warm-up questions were asked, followed by the main questions, as outlined in the interview guide (S1 File). Participants were provided an honorarium to cover their transportation and lunch costs. During and immediately after each interview, the interviewer wrote field notes to capture non-verbal cues and her reflections. A debriefing meeting with MM was conducted via a phone call.

Data analysis

The Amharic audio data were transcribed verbatim manually and imported to NVivo software. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data [60,61]. This analysis approach aligns with the study’s theoretical and paradigmatic foundations, which underlines the subjectivity of participants’ experiences and acknowledge the reflexive influence of the researcher’s interpretation in shaping the analysis [62]. We followed six phases of thematic analysis, which reflect recursive and iterative processes [63]. First, to gain a better contextual understanding of the data, MM familiarized herself with the data by repeatedly listening to the audio-recorded data, reading the Amharic transcripts, and reviewing the field notes. Then, MM completed open-coding in the Amharic transcripts using NVivo 14 (QSR International) software [64]. AB (secondary coder) coded one of the transcripts and discussed with MM to develop the initial codes. In addition, one transcript was translated into English, and MM and BB (senior author) discussed the initial codes, as well as held multiple discussions during the development of categories, sub-themes, and themes. Themes were generated by aggregating codes with similar meanings, translating them into English with the associated codes and data, and sharing them with the research team for feedback. Then, a recursive review of candidate themes was conducted based on the coded data items and the entire dataset. Finally, themes and sub-themes were defined in relation to the dataset and the research question, and then the report was produced [61,65]. To maintain consistency in meaning, themes, subthemes, and associated data were translated from Amharic to English by a professional translator and then back to Amharic by two language-proficient translators with a health science background. Descriptive analysis was completed for sociodemographic data.

Trustworthiness

As Lincoln and Guba (1985) recommended, we ensured rigor by establishing four criteria: credibility, dependability, conformability, and transferability. To ensure credibility, the first author repeatedly listened to the audio data and read the Amharic transcripts several times to prolong the engagement with the data. A secondary coder coded some of the data to get multiple perspectives (triangulation). In addition, BB and MM continuously discussed the research process and findings, which were critically evaluated by the entire research team [66].

An audit trail was maintained to enhance dependability by documenting all aspects of the research process. NVivo supported the audit trail of the coding process by systematically documenting each coding activity, making the process transparent and accessible. Reflexive journaling was used to record reflections on methodological decisions and challenges, as well as how these influenced the study’s progress. To ensure confirmability, the first author engaged in self-reflection to acknowledge how background, values, experiences, and assumptions could impact the data analysis and interpretation, allowing the presentation of the findings in a balanced and honest manner. A detailed description of the research context and participants is provided to strengthen the transferability of the findings.

Ethical considerations

We obtained ethical clearance from Queen’s University Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Ethics Board (Ref.No-6039390) and also from the University of Gondar, Institutional Ethics Review Board of the College of Medicine Health Sciences, and Specialized Hospital (Ref. No-CMHSHRCS-06/02/05/9/2023). The research process, purpose, potential risks, and benefits were explained to all participants in their local language, Amharic, and all participation was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants, and the data collector assisted by reading the consent form aloud to those who lacked sufficient literacy to read it independently. To maintain confidentiality, individual identifiers were removed, and participants were given number identifiers.

Inclusivity in global research

Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research is included in the Supporting Information (S1 Checklist).

Sociodemographic characteristics of family caregivers

A total of 13 family caregivers of children with CP were interviewed, of whom 92.3% (n = 12) were mothers. The mean age of family caregivers was 34.5 years, ranging between 27 and 45 years. All family caregivers were Orthodox Christians. More than half of family caregivers were unemployed (Table 1). About 23% (n = 3) of family caregivers were divorced following the birth of their child with CP. Regarding the children’s characteristics, 69.2% (n = 9) of children with CP were female. The mean age of children with CP was 7.1 years, ranging between 2.83 and 16 years. Of the 13 children with CP, only one was enrolled in school. (Table 2).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of family caregivers of children with CP.

Age in years n = 13(%)
25-29 4(30.8)
30-34 2(15.4)
35-39 5(38.3)
40-45 2(15.4)
Relationship with the child
Mother 12(92.3)
Aunt 1(7.7)
Residence
Urban 12(92.3)
Rural 1(7.7)
Marital status
Married 9(69.2)
Divorced 3(23.1)
Widowed 1(7.7)
Religion
Orthodox Christian 13 (100)
Level of education
No education 2(15.4)
Primary 7(53.8)
Secondary 2(15.4)
College 2(15.4)
Economic status as perceived by caregivers (poor, medium, rich)
Poor 12(92.3)
Medium 1(7.7)
Number of children in the household
≤2 9(69.2)
3-4 4(30.8)
Occupation
No 6(46.1)
Cleaner 4(30.8)
Daily labourer 2(15.4)
Farmer 1(7.7)

Table 2. Characteristics of children with CP.

Age in years. Months n = 13 (%)
2-4 3(23.1)
4.1-6 4(30.8)
6.1-12 5(38.3)
12.1-18 1(7.7)
Biological sex
Male 4(30.8)
Female 9(69.2)
Birth order relative to siblings
1st 3(23.1)
2nd 6(46.1)
3rd 2(15.4)
4th 2(15.4)
Education enrollment
Enrolled 1(7.7)
Not enrolled 12(92.3)
GMFCS*
IV 6(46.1)
V 7(53.8)
MACS**
I 3(23.1)
II 1(7.7)
IV 2(15.4)
V 7(53.8)
CFCS***
II 1(7.7)
III 11(84.6)
V 1(7.7)

*Gross Motor Function Classification System

**Manual Activity Classification System

***Communication Function Classification System

Findings

The experience and support needs of family caregivers of children with CP

Four themes were identified from the analysis of transcripts: emotional journey of caregivers, daily caregiving demands, impact of caregiving, and support systems and support needs. These themes, along with their subthemes and representative participant quotes, are presented in Table 3 and described below.

Table 3. Themes and sub-themes.

Number Themes Sub-themes
1 Caregivers emotional journey Feeling shocked
Feeling regret
Worrying about the child’s future
2 Daily caregiving demands Providing practical daily support
“We are their tongue”- Supporting child’s communication
“I couldn’t make it work”-Balancing caregiving with life dynamics
Transportation and environmental obstacles
Social stigma
4 Impact of caregiving Impact on physical health
Impact on mental health
Social isolation
Personal growth and resilience
5 Support systems and support needs Natural support
“I used to believe this was only happening to me”-CBR support
Support needs

Theme 1. Emotional journey of caregivers

Caregivers reported experiencing various emotional reactions from the time of the initial diagnosis across all other challenges brought by caregiving for their child with CP. This theme was defined by sub-themes of feeling shocked, regretting and worrying about the child’s future.

Feeling shocked.

Caregivers shared how they started to show concern when their child didn’t reach the developmental milestones at the expected age. At the time of the diagnosis, caregivers experienced shock, disbelief, and an overwhelming sense of grief and confusion. One participant said: “I was shocked when I first heard of my child’s condition (P-9)”. Another participant explained:

When she couldn’t sit and walk like her friends, I was concerned and took her to the hospital; they told me it was CP caused by complications during childbirth. Hearing this explanation, I was fainted because she was normal when she was born. (P-3)

Caregivers expressed feelings of unpreparedness and a lack of knowledge about the actions they could take immediately following the diagnosis. They experienced a sense of hopelessness regarding their child’s prognosis and contemplated abandonment as a potential escape; however, none of the participants ultimately considered institutionalizing their children with CP. For example, one mother said:

When doctors told me it was CP, I didn’t understand what it was. I thought the child was of no use, and my family suggested giving him up for adoption. I didn’t believe that he could improve. I was concerned about where to leave or what to do with him. (P-2)

Feeling regret.

As caregivers navigated the challenging journey of supporting a child with CP, they often found themselves grappling with deep feelings of regret about the opportunities that slipped away and the dreams that were left unfulfilled. They reflected on the moments that could have been, contemplating how different their lives might have been had their child been born healthy or, perhaps, if they had passed away shortly after birth: “Sometimes, I wish she had passed away at birth; then, I wouldn’t have suffered this much.” (P-5). These thoughts weighed heavily on their hearts, intertwining with their daily experiences and shaping their perceptions of what could have been a more straightforward, hopeful life. One caregiver described:

I wanted to go to and work in an Arab country and return. If my child were healthy, I would have left him with my family and gone there. The reason I am living in poverty now is because of my child’s disability. (P-2)

Other participants said: “I had a different goal in the past and abandoned it, now living low where I am from; I can’t escape it. How would you escape?” (P-4). Caregivers also described feeling trapped and wishing they could turn back the clock. One mother indicated:

People around me used to wonder where I would end up, with positive expectations. However, I now find myself feeling stuck in this situation. I prayed to God, asking Him to change the course of time for me. (P-7)

Worrying about the child’s future.

This sub-theme reflects the emotional burden of caregivers regarding the future of their child with special needs. Caregivers were concerned about how they would carry and lift when the child grows, how to manage menstruation for females, and when they could no longer care. For example, one mother explained her worries as follows:

I am deeply concerned about her future. If she is not cured, it won’t be easy. Since she is female, she will experience menstruation after the age of 14, and I am worried about how I am going to manage that. Additionally, I am concerned about how I will carry her as she grows. I ask myself: Will my child be in this situation forever? What will I do? How can I manage her needs? These are my concerns about the future. Right now, she is young, and caregiving is not as challenging as I expect it will be in the future. The future will be much more challenging and overwhelming compared to the present. (P-3)

Another caregiver described her concerns about her daughter becoming an adult and how she wishes to live as long as her daughter to be able to take care of herself:

What if I die in the middle of this? Who will take care of her? Who will make sure she has food and water? No one will care for her like a mother does. I pray for our death to come the same day. In addition, she is 16 years old and going through puberty. I feel uncomfortable when I go out and leave her alone because I’m worried about the possibility of her being assaulted by local gangs. (P-6)

Still, other mothers talked about many other uncertainties related to independence of their children. For example, one mother said:

I’m worried about his future. Will he be able to speak? Will he be able to walk? Will he use his hands? What’s causing his difficulty with swallowing? What’s obstructing his esophagus? All these uncertainties are weighing heavily on my mind. (P-2)

Theme 2: Daily caregiving demands

This theme encompasses the daily tasks and responsibilities of caregivers for children with CP, along with the external challenges they encounter. Five subthemes define this theme, which are: providing practical daily assistance, supporting child communication, balancing caregiving with life dynamics, transportation and environmental obstacles, and social stigma.

Providing practical daily assistance.

This sub-theme describes the essential practical assistance that family caregivers provide to their children with CP in their daily lives. It outlines various tasks that caregivers undertake, such as preparing meals, feeding, assisting with personal hygiene (toileting, bathing, dressing), engaging in play, carrying (transporting) the children, and managing their medications. Family caregivers reported how they were committed to attending frequent medical checks and physical therapy appointments by carrying their children with CP on their backs for long distances. Furthermore, the caregivers described feeding and dressing as challenging as the child couldn’t sit upright. One mother said:

I wake up in the early morning and prepare her breakfast. I wipe her face, toilet her, and feed her breakfast. After three or two hours, there’s another meal and her medicine. The challenge is that it takes her two hours to feed in the morning (…) At lunchtime, I give her another meal. I keep an eye on the time, making sure she doesn’t miss toileting. Often, she wets herself. So, I must change her clothes before someone else comes and sees her in that state (…) I go to the hospital or health center every week or two. She spends a lot of time at the hospital—three times a week, I take her carrying on my back. (…). It’s a struggle, but I am doing it. There’s no transportation, but I come from the outskirts of [city] three times a week carrying her on my back and walking. (P-13)

Another mother explained how the increased muscle tone of the child with CP made the daily caregiving difficult: “I bathe her frequently and feed her on my lap because she can’t sit upright. Dressing her is also challenging due to the stiffness in her legs.” (P-8)

“We mothers are their tongue”- Supporting child’s communication.

This sub-theme illustrates the role of family caregivers in facilitating communication for children with CP who struggled to express themselves by speech, emphasizing the caregivers’ essential role in ensuring the child is heard and understood. The phrase “We are their tongues” signifies how those caregivers spoke on behalf of their children, interpreting their needs, feelings, and desires by understanding children’s facial expressions, body movements or other cues. One mother described:

(…) because a child like this can’t speak, we moms are their tongue, or we are the one who understands what their needs are through their cues, my child never says a word when he is thirsty or hungry, he can’t say it, we mothers are the ones who can understand and express their need with much struggle. (P-7)

Participants described how they interpreted children’s communication signs, expressions, vocalizations and body movements. One mother noted:

If she is thirsty, she tried to say a word near water, and when she wanted something to eat, she protruded out her tongue; when she wanted to pee, she kept slipping from her buttock. She has her cue, and I understand her cues because I am her mom living with her all the time. (P-3)

Mothers also talked about their hopes and attempts to communicate despite lack of children’s ability to speak. One mother stated:

I raise my voice, like an echo from a tin can, trying to get her attention, and I call her loudly, saying, “Mom, love!” even if she doesn’t respond. I keep doing it because I believe that over time it will help her learn to pay attention and listen, even though speaking is hard for her. (P-13)

“I couldn’t make it work” - Balancing caregiving and life dynamics.

This subtheme describes the sacrifices caregivers make to manage the demands of caregiving alongside other life commitments such as marriage and work. It emphasizes how caregivers prioritize the comfort and well-being of their children over their own needs. For example, one mother captured the hard situation she faced as she needed to choose between her husband and her child. She said:

(…) I couldn’t manage both (marriage responsibility and caregiving). I thought it would be better to prioritize my child, so I divorced my husband. If I had a healthy child, I might have been able to balance everything. But for me, it isn’t easy to handle both. I couldn’t make it work. (P-1)

Another mother explained the time needed to care for her child and needed sacrifices:

When raising a child like this, you sacrifice much of yourself. You could get married, of course, but it might not work out. If I start a relationship, I won’t be able to give my child the time he needs. So, I want to waste my time and energy with my child. I’ve thought about it and decided to focus on my child and leave my life behind completely. (P-7)

Participants also explained how they needed to quit working to be able to care for their children. For example, one mother said:

I used to have a job, but because of him, I had to leave it. It was my business; I was a hairdresser and had a salon. Everything stopped. Those who used to work for me (crying….) have now reached a great place in these six years, while it’s been challenging for me. (P-1)

Transportation and environmental obstacles.

Caregivers expressed the challenges of accessing the only available daycare services due to the long distance from home to Gondar and difficulties with transportation. They desired more conveniently located daycare options. One of the mothers explained: “I cannot bring my child to daycare due to the distance I live from Gondar and the difficulty of getting transportation. I wish the daycare were closer so that I could use it” (P-13). In addition, caregivers who had access to a wheelchair preferred to carry their child on their back instead of using the wheelchair for transportation due to the geographically challenging terrain and road conditions that made wheelchair use impossible. One mother said: “Despite that I had a wheelchair provided by the CBR, I prefer to carry my 12-year-old daughter on my back because the road condition is downhill and not suitable for wheelchair use.” (P-12)

Social stigma.

This subtheme reflects the lack of understanding, and negative attitudes of the community members and the caregiver’s own family towards children with CP, and their caregivers. The participants shared that others had misconceptions about the cause of CP and understood it as a punishment from God or caused by a curse. Community members feared the potential negative consequences of being in contact with children and their belongings. Caregivers were insulted and blamed as they were made responsible for the child’s disability. One mother explained:

My own families keep asking why the child can’t walk. They say, “Is this a curse? Or what have you done for this to happen? ‘What have you done to God?” They think it’s something I brought up by myself, and they fear a generational curse. They don’t seem to have any understanding of what’s happening. (P-9)

Another mother shared how she was insulted by others: “People around me perceive that CP is caused due to a curse or punishment from God in response to my wrongdoing; they insult me like this, and it hurts me a lot.” (P-3). In addition, some participants indicated that they lost meaningful social interactions due to misconceptions and stigma. For example, one participant said: “My neighbours withdraw me from any social interaction due to my child’s disease condition; they no longer share anything with us, even fire, which is the minimum thing we used to share.” (P-6)

Theme 3. Impact of caregiving

This theme encompasses the impact of the demand for caregiving on the health and social life of family caregivers, as well as the benefits of caregiving. The subthemes that defined this theme were the impact on physical health, mental health, social isolation, and personal growth and resilience.

Impact on physical health.

Participants emphasized how caregiving was physically demanding over time due to the increased age and weight of the child, which created difficulty in lifting and carrying. They described the exhaustion, intense pain, numbness, and lack of sleep as the result of the demanding nature of caregiving. One mother said: “Lifting to transfer and carrying her on my back is challenging as her age and body weight increase. Now, I feel completely exhausted, and my back hurts so badly.” (P-10)

Another caregiver explained how she developed back pain due to taking care of her child:

I am taking care of her, but I’m struggling and feeling exhausted. It’s affecting my health, and most of the time, my back hurts. Given my age and physical condition, carrying her on my back from home to the hospital is overwhelming. I can’t sit comfortably or lie down on my side without feeling intense pain in my back. It feels like my spine is about to break (…). (P-13)

Caregivers also shared consequences of physical work to lift and carry their child over time, as they became older. One mother explained:

For the past three years, I’ve been holding him on my lap because nothing works to calm his cries. My left leg, in particular, no longer functions properly. I rely on a taxi for transportation and struggle with walking downstairs. My hands have become numb from holding him for so long. At night, he has difficulty falling asleep. I hold him on my lap and try to comfort him, but he often stays awake until 2:00 a.m., and I can’t sleep until he does. (P-4)

Another caregiver said: “Wherever I go, I used to carry her on my back up to her 14 years old, but now I can’t manage to carry her; my body is exhausted.” (P-6)

Impact on mental health.

This sub-theme highlights the mental health challenges faced by caregivers of children with CP. Caregivers described experiencing feelings of anger, frustration, anxiety, forgetfulness, and difficulty concentrating, which stemmed from the physical and emotional demands of their role. They also continuously worried about their child’s future. Witnessing their child’s struggles firsthand, coupled with societal misconceptions and stigma surrounding disabilities, added to the mental health strain experienced by caregivers. For example, one mother talked about her life as ‘chaotic’ and her effort to seek solitude, while she also needed to care for other children:

(…) caregiving for my son significantly impacted my mental health. I haven’t had any rest, and it’s taking a toll on me. I’ve been experiencing forgetfulness lately, and my life feels chaotic and unstable. I seek solitude, often shutting myself in at home to find peace. However, my other kids’ constant noise and interruptions make maintaining the silence I need difficult. (P-7)

Other caregivers indicated feeling angry and overwhelmed. One participant explained:

(…) I feel angry about why this is happening to me. Lately, I’ve started forgetting where I put things and losing track of my thoughts. This happens because I’m overwhelmed by the physical demands of caregiving and constantly worrying about what will happen to her tomorrow. (P-13)

Seeing the pain that the child experiences daily and the stigma surrounding the disability have affected the caregiver’s mental health, as captured by this mother:

Even though this disability affects the child, it has a significant impact on the mental health of me. This is because, first, I experience my child’s pain every day, and second, the community’s misconceptions and insults about disability also cause mental suffering. Some people even believe that CP is a result of the parent’s sins, and hearing this can be devastating and cause immense mental anguish. (P-5)

Social Isolation.

Caregiving impacted the ability of family caregivers to engage in social activities. Some caregivers uncovered that they lacked assistance with childcare, making it challenging to participate equally in social life with their peers. Others shared that they spent considerable time caring for their children with CP, which led to feelings of isolation, even from close family members. Concerns regarding their child’s safety, including medication management and personal care, further limited their attendance at social gatherings. Even those with some support for childcare often struggled with a lack of trust in others to provide the same level of care and attention, resulting in a disconnection from social activities.

Participants described losing contact with their peers. One mother explained:

I can’t connect with anyone because it takes time to do these things. It’s hard to take my son to social activities. I can’t leave him at home as no one else cares for him (…). I don’t have any social relations. So, I can’t participate in anything, and I can’t be equal with my peers. (P-1)

Caregivers described how bringing their child to social events made them worry about humiliation, so they stopped attending such events. One mother said: “Participating in social life is challenging for me, and I live in isolation, even from my family. I spend most of my time caring for her. If I take her with me, I worry about facing stigma” (P-6). As participants emphasized their social isolation, they also identified a lack of adequate social support as a source of their isolation:

I am unable to take her to social events such as funerals, weddings, or visits to the sick. I have no one to leave her with, and I worry about potential hazards, such as exposure to electricity or hot water. This leaves me isolated from social life. If I go somewhere, who will give her medication on time? Who will feed her with the same care I do? I wouldn’t have any peace of mind if I left her alone. I wouldn’t trust anyone else to handle her toileting and personal hygiene. As a result, I remain disconnected from social life. (P-13)

Personal growth and resilience.

Despite the negative impact of caregiving on health and social life, family caregivers also discovered numerous positive effects of caring for a child with CP. Caregiving opened the door to enhancing social interaction skills, exploring new career opportunities, and experiencing significant growth in maturity and a sense of purpose through the evolving role and relationship with the child. Caregiving has also provided chances to establish meaningful social connections, deepened their faith in God, and helped develop a resilience mindset for future life challenges. One caregiver explained:

Previously, I struggled with interacting with people and didn’t know how to handle social situations. However, due to my child and thanks to the training support I received from CBR, I am much better at this. I can now engage with others more effectively and feel more comfortable in social interactions. I also got a job opportunity at CBR. (P-3)

Participants also mentioned how caregiving has helped them build social connections and access valuable emotional support, which has brought them happiness and gratitude. One mother said:

Due to my child, I know a lot of people. I sell fruits on the street, and people often come by to buy from me, not just for the fruit but to support and encourage me. While the money helps, what matters most is the emotional support I receive. It makes me feel happy and grateful. (P-5)

Some caregivers also mentioned how they matured after having a child with CP. One mother said: “After I gave birth to her, she changed my life and made me a mature person” (P-9). Participants expressed that the presence of their child has profoundly shaped their life and identity. One mother said: “I thank God because, without my child coming into my life, I would not know what I would be like” (P-1). In addition, caregivers emphasized that taking the child to different spiritual and religious places questing for healing helped them to strengthen their faith. One mother explained:” I didn’t know God before, but because of my child, I’ve had the opportunity to visit various spiritual and religious places that have strengthened my faith. I am very grateful and happy for this experience.” (P-3).

Caregivers explained how they learned valuable lessons from their continued challenges, which have strengthened their ability to be prepared for future adversities and fostered resilience. One mother said:

Even if I don’t foresee greater difficulties beyond what I’ve already faced, I have been taught that it’s possible to encounter more hardship. I understand that more challenges might come, and I am prepared to face them with the lesson I got from this experience. (P-4)

One caregiver used an Ethiopian proverb, “Horns are not heavy for a cow,” (P-2), which indicated that certain burdens or responsibilities may feel natural or manageable for those who bear them, just like a cow carrying its horns. In the context of caregiving for a child, it reflected her determination and love as a parent, indicating that while carrying her daughter may be physically demanding, it’s a part of her life that she embraces without complaint.

Theme 4. Support systems and support needs

Natural support.

Caregivers received physical, informational, and emotional support from their natural support systems, such as family, friends, and neighbours. However, the same support sources were reported as a source of distress in the earlier findings. Spirituality and religion played a crucial role in the lives of family caregivers, with all caregivers emphasizing that their faith in God helped them find the strength and support needed to persevere. Engaging in spiritual practices, such as attending church and praying, served as vital coping strategies during difficult times, alleviating worries and enhancing their overall well-being.

Caregivers highlighted how siblings, friends, and neighbours were essential sources of support through their caregiving journeys; however, these circles were reported as a source of distress in the earlier findings. One mother said: “Her older sister helps me a lot, especially when her period is coming; she prepares and changes her underwear and pad when needed.” (P-6). However, the involvement of siblings in caregiving negatively impacted their school attendance and educational achievement. For instance, one caregiver noted, “Whenever I want to go somewhere, my daughter has to miss school to care for her sibling with CP. As a result, her academic performance is very low.”(P-8).

Another mother indicated how friends were supportive emotionally and led to a formal support service: “My friends are on my side all the time by giving advice and reassurance comfort, and telling me where to go to get services, and they are the ones who told me about CBR and pushed me to enroll.” (P-2). Similarly, one mother expressed the emotional support she got from her neighbours: “My neighbours, even though they didn’t help me with childcare, provided me encouragement and empathy and gave me hope by saying, ‘One day he is going to be fine. Be strong’.” (P-4).

All caregivers mentioned that religion and spirituality helped them cope with the stress of caregiving, and they attributed divine intervention as the source of their endurance and survival. One mother explained:

As an Orthodox Christian, I find peace through prayer, which brings me tranquility and helps me feel better. I prefer going to church when I am under significant stress, as it helps alleviate my worries. This practice has always been my way of coping with stress. (P-1)

Another mother expressed that no one was on her side except God who helped her to come this far:

Despite all the challenges, I thank God that I am still surviving. It is through God’s help that I have come this far. I now realize that my strength, power, and endurance all come from the child of the Virgin Mary. No one else has been with me by my side; only God stands and strengthens me. (P-7)

Spiritual fathers also provided emotional support for some caregivers by offering home visits, advice, and check-in calls, ensuring they did not miss weekly church masses. One mother said:

My spiritual father gave advice and reassured me that cerebral palsy is not a sign of divine anger. I faithfully attend mass every Sunday; if I miss a service, my spiritual father always checks in on me. He also makes sure my child receives holy water and Holy Communion. Their care and concern for both of us bring me great happiness. (P-3)

While caregivers initially experienced emotional pain and sorrow, they ultimately came to embrace their role with a deeper understanding and acceptance. Caregivers conveyed that their child was a gift from God. They explained how spirituality helped them to overcome the struggle and accept a new reality. One mother said:

Initially, I was overwhelmed. However, as time passed, I had to calm myself, accept the situation, and thank God. That’s all I could do... (crying) I realized there was no way out through struggle, so I chose to be grateful to God. I accepted it, and now I pray that He (God) doesn’t add more challenges (sobbing). That’s how I’ve managed to get through this, through prayer and trusting in God. (P-1)

Caregivers described how faith helped them to accept their child’s condition. One mother explained:

In our community, people point out and say these are mothers of children with disabilities. Now, it doesn’t resonate. Because I didn’t buy it from the market or choose it, God gave it to me. It would have resonated with me if it had been in the past, and I was crying a lot. (P-9)

Another caregiver indicated: “There is nothing I can do because God gave him to me. After all, the Creator gave him to me” (P-12). Similarly, another mother said: “I am grateful; she is God’s gift. I will not go anywhere, no choice; I have accepted what God has given me.” (P-5). Caregivers reported being overwhelmed by the caregiving and turned to God to seek a cure for their child and to get relief from the caregiving burden. One mother explained: “What can I do when God has given me this burden? I wish He grant her the cure.” (P-13).

“I used to believe this was only happening to me” - CBR support.

CBR was the only source of formal support for caregivers, and it offered various forms of assistance, including education, small financial loans for some caregivers, physiotherapy, wheelchairs, and daycare services for their children. CBR also facilitated the formation of support groups and regular meetings, fostering a sense of community that alleviated feelings of isolation, and promoted emotional adjustment through shared experiences. Furthermore, those who accessed the daycare reported experiencing mental relief, and their children showed positive progress. One mother said:

“I have never gotten support from the government or any other organization except CBR. CBR supported me a wheelchair for my child and a small loan to start a business, but this doesn’t match with my needs.” (P-1).

Caregivers who had been attending “Holy Water” for a long time were now thankful for their child’s progress following physical therapy given by CBR field workers. One mother indicated:

I believed holy water would heal her, and I tried holy water in different places for an extended period. Then, lately, I took her to the hospital, where I heard about the physical therapy offered by CBR. Even though she couldn’t speak so far, I am grateful to see some progress, such as holding a bottle and feeding herself. I am genuinely thankful. (P-13)

The participants highlighted how CBR organized caregivers into support groups and delivered training regularly. Caregivers were able to accept their child and got relief after meeting other caregivers with the same condition at CBR. One mother explained:

Before I met other caregivers like me, I used to believe this was only happening to me. But now, after seeing children with even more severe disabilities here in CBR, I’ve come to accept her with gratitude to God. I am thankful for her, and I embrace her as a blessing. (P-8)

Another caregiver explained how CBR provided training, which improved her mental well-being, however, she could not get financial support, which was her priority. This mother said:

I used to feel deeply distressed when I saw her typically developing peers. Over time, the training and education have helped me feel more at ease and improved my mental well-being. However, beyond that, CBR has not offered any financial support, which I need most. (P-3)

The daycare in CBR helped caregivers to get relief from the caregiving burden and children also benefited, for example, they started gaining weight after joining the daycare. One mother noted:

I used to cry when I saw my son’s age equals going to school, but now I got mental relief since my child has joined this daycare; he is also gaining weight because they feed him. I am so grateful for those who made this happen. (P-2)

Support needs.

All caregivers underscored the importance of caregiver-focused support to ensure the well-being of their children with CP. One mother said:

Although the impairment affects the children, it is the parents who suffer the most and are deeply impacted. Primarily, I believe it is essential to focus on supporting the parents rather than the children. So, the main focus should be on supporting parents. If parents are supported, they can provide better care and protection for their children. When parents are healthy and have a good mental health, they can better care for and love their children. (P-1)

Caregivers reported various support needs, including financial support, psychological counseling, healthcare services, access to assistive devices, and access to child education. The financial challenges faced by caregivers affected their ability to meet the essential daily needs of their children, particularly for items such as milk, diapers, and food, as captured by one caregiver who said: “For my child, all the basic things are needed because I am financially unable to fulfill them by myself.” (P-1). Another mother stated: “I couldn’t afford to pay rent. I need housing support. If I do not pay rent, then I can sleep with peace of mind.” (P-2). Consequently, the main support need identified by caregivers was financial support to foster economic independence and self-sufficiency. One participant explained:

Even though I’m struggling financially a lot, I’m not asking for money from people as an option. I don’t want to beg people. I want to work and improve my life while caring for my child, but I lack the financial resources to start a small business. I applied for a government loan, which was denied because I don’t have property to use as collateral. Therefore, I am seeking financial support to help me get started. (P-3)

Caregivers couldn’t leave their children to work, but they wanted to run a small business from home while caring for their kids. Financial issues were a big obstacle. One participant said: “I would be very happy if I could start working while caring for my child. I believe that working is the only way to solve my financial struggles. I have always thought of having a small kiosk. However, without a penny on my hand, it remains nothing more than a wish.” (P-1). Another participant added: “If I get financial support, I will create my own business at home.” (P-6). The ongoing conflict and instability in the region have exacerbated their economic challenges, along with the rising cost of living. One caregiver explained: “Due to the war, I lost my source of income. At times, we didn’t even have anything to eat. I started a small business on the street to meet some of my children’s needs, but as you can see, the situation [the inflation and instability] in the country has worsened. It’s hard to earn any income from that now.” (P-7).

In addition, the psychological counselling services were identified as essential in addressing caregivers’ mental health needs, thereby enhancing their capacity to provide optimal care for children. One mother explained:

Caregivers like me should get psychological counselling because our mental well-being is greatly affected. I need support for my mental health, and CBR should have professionals who can offer this crucial psychological support. I have not received any psychological support so far. (P-7)

The caregivers highlighted their unmet need to obtain adequate healthcare services. Key issues mentioned by the participants included a lack of comprehensive health information about CP, long waiting times, unprofessional attitudes from professionals, and an absence of essential treatments or therapies. Caregivers expressed their lack of knowledge about the cause of their child’s condition, treatment and its long-term implications due to unclear and inadequate information from healthcare professionals. One mother explained:

I don’t even understand the illness’s nature and cause. Whenever I ask the doctors about his condition, they keep telling me it is related to birth, that is it. I am not educated to navigate about the disease. I want to know if it is a problem related to the brain and how it can be resolved. These were my concerns, but what should I do if the doctors couldn’t clarify? How can I know by myself? I couldn’t. (P-4)

Due to a lack of knowledge about CP, some caregivers blamed themselves, associating CP with wrongdoing and punishment from God. One mother said, “I questioned God why He gave me a child like this, wondering what sin I had committed” (P-8).

Long waiting times and a poor attitude from health professionals, led caregivers to stop follow-up appointments and place hope in divine intervention for their child’s condition. One mother described:

I have been bringing my child to the hospital for his follow-up appointments. Despite arriving early in the morning, I often wait the entire day, with no priority given to him. (…) One day, the doctor stopped me and asked why I was coming. She said, ‘He is no longer growing, so there’s no need to come anymore.’ After that, I stopped the follow-up. I began praying, ‘God, you are the one who can restore everything you’ve given me.’ I realized there was no point in continuing to go to the hospital, so I stopped the follow-up. (P-7)

In addition, caregivers reported that physical therapy was the only treatment provided for their children with CP in the hospital, which didn’t bring improvement in their children’s condition. As a result, they were obliged to seek alternative cure, such as holy water for healing. For example, one mother indicated:

I have taken her to the hospital three or four times, but it hasn’t helped because she received no treatment beyond physiotherapy. I will take her to the “holy water” if God grants her forgiveness; I have no other options (…). I remain hopeful that God will bring her healing. (P-11)

Caregivers identified a need for assistive devices such as wheelchairs for transportation and helping their child to sit and feed in an upright position. One mother explained:

My child needs a wheelchair. She wants to sit, but I don’t have a wheelchair, can’t afford to buy. I made a seat from a cardboard box and clothes, but she’s growing and [the seat] is no longer strong enough to hold her. If I could find a wheelchair, it would make a big difference and allow her to sit comfortably. (P-3)

Furthermore, caregivers emphasized the importance of education for their children. One mother said: “My child needs an education. I want her to go to school like her friends and learn and transform her life.” (P-10). Apart from the long-term benefit that education brings to the child’s future, caregivers believed that sending their child to school would provide some time for them to work and meet their child’s needs. One mother noted: “If my child can go to school, I will also be able to work and meet her needs.” (P-6).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to explore the caregiving experiences and support needs of family caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia. Caregiving for children with CP was found to be a complex experience characterized by demanding responsibilities, external challenges and a limited support system that negatively impacted the well-being of caregivers, despite some positive experiences being reported. Financial support, psychological support, adequate healthcare service, access to assistive devices, and access to child education were the support needs identified by caregivers. Below, we discuss the main findings in relation to the existing evidence and provide suggestions for future research, policy, and practice.

The experience of caregiving for children with CP

Globally, deep-rooted gender norms result in family caregiving still being widely perceived as women’s work [67]. As a result, women currently perform up to 81% of unpaid caregiver roles worldwide [68]. In the current study, all caregivers were women (12 were mothers and 1 was an aunt) who assumed the responsibility of meeting their children’s daily needs, managing household chores, and sometimes serving as primary breadwinners. Our participant representation reflected the deeply rooted patriarchal norms in Ethiopia, which expect women, specifically mothers, to carry the primary burden of domestic duties, including caring for children with disability [69]. In this context, caregiving could impose a double burden on women who already have demanding day-to-day responsibilities and might also exclude them from participation in education, paid employment, and political and social engagement [46,70]. Such exclusion could reduce their access to resources, autonomy in household and healthcare decision-making, and impact their well-being, ultimately affecting their ability to provide quality care for their child with CP. Contrary to our study, a recent research conducted in Saudi Arabia found that caregiving for children with CP was shared between mothers and fathers, indicating a shift from the traditional view of women as the primary caregivers [71]. Although the study purposefully searched for fathers, our study participant representation may highlight the need to increase awareness to challenge prevailing gender norms in unpaid care.

On top of this, caregivers in our study frequently attended hospital visits and physical therapy sessions for their children’s complex health issues. They also faced stigma, limited access to assistive devices, a lack of respite care services, and accessible physical infrastructure. Many of them carried their children on their backs regardless of the children’s age and weight, which exacerbated physical health concerns such as exhaustion, back pain, numbness, and sleep disturbances. The findings align with a study conducted in India, which highlighted that caregivers of children with CP experienced a profound burden resulting from the intersection of gender inequity, poverty, and social stigma [72]. Moreover, the conceptual model of the caregiving process and outcome indicated that the caregiver’s well-being is a dynamic interaction between contextual factors, the care recipient’s functioning, and available support systems. Therefore, more demanding caregiving roles, coupled with inadequate support systems, lead to negative physical and psychological health outcomes for caregivers, which indicates the concepts underpinning in this model are relevant to the Ethiopian context [9,20]. Previous studies in Africa similarly reported that musculoskeletal issues, particularly back pain, are common complaints among caregivers of children with CP, which are attributed to the demands of caregiving and the lack of assistive devices [38,7376]. The previous and current study findings underscore the critical need to ensure access to assistive devices, day-care programs, and respite care services to help caregivers find essential relief from the demands of caregiving.

The findings of the present study raise concerns regarding Ethiopia’s commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), to which it is a signatory. According to Article 20 of the CRPD, Ethiopia is required to ensure personal mobility for individuals with disabilities, including access to assistive devices and technologies. Additionally, Article 9 emphasized the need to eliminate barriers to accessibility in buildings, transportation, and other facilities [77]. Moreover, Ethiopia’s commitment to inclusive education is affirmed in its ratification of CRPD. In contrast, in the current study, among the 13 children with CP, only one child was enrolled in school. Children with CP who do not attend school require constant care, making it difficult for their caregivers to manage this duty alongside other responsibilities, such as caring for other family members and managing day-to-day life. This reflects the systemic issue rooted in structural, economic, and attitudinal barriers to inclusive education [51,78], where only 11% of children with special needs are enrolled in primary education and 2.8% in secondary education in Ethiopia (ESDP, 2021). Another research evidence also shows that there is limited acceptance and retention of children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia’s mainstream schools as compared to other disabilities due to their requirement of additional support [52,79]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the full implementation of CRPD to enhance access to assistive technology, improve the accessibility of physical environments, and promote inclusive education, ultimately reducing the physical strain on caregivers.

Caregivers in our study experienced a range of ongoing emotions from shock and regret to fear and worry about the future, reflecting their children’s total dependence, lack of reliable support systems, such as mental health support. This finding is consistent with a recent study conducted in Gondar, which reported that caregivers of children with CP often felt shock, disbelief, fear, and confusion, as well as fear about their child’s future [80]. In our study, widespread societal misconceptions surrounding CP led to caregivers’ social isolation and contributed to their mental health challenges, including anger, anxiety, forgetfulness, and difficulty concentrating. The finding aligns with previous research, which underscores how caregiving for children with CP can exacerbate mental health challenges, particularly due to future uncertainties and the physical demands of caregiving [28,74]. A study in Nigeria also found that poor marital relationships, lack of social interaction, and feelings of loneliness were linked to depression among caregivers of children with CP [81]. Similarly, caregivers of children with CP in Ghana faced stigmatization, which resulted in social isolation, guilt, and even suicidal thoughts [35]. Our study findings imply the need for ongoing mental health support for caregivers, and creating public awareness campaigns to combat the stigma associated with CP could enhance the well-being of caregivers.

Despite the enormous negative impact of caregiving on caregivers’ well-being, positive caregiving experiences were reported, including personal growth and resilience. Caregivers who reported caregiving gains received financial support, training, and job opportunities from CBR and were actively engaged in support groups. These caregivers also used natural support, religion and spirituality, as a source of strength and hope during the challenging time. A previous study in Ethiopia showed spirituality had a vital role in the lives of parents of children with disabilities, especially in the face of discrimination and inadequate support [82]. Another study in Turkey also found that mothers of children with developmental disabilities often turn to spirituality as a coping strategy, helping them manage emotional distress and find meaning in their new lives [83]. A study in Iran also demonstrated that the positive effects of spirituality to reduce mother’s caregiving strain [84]. Regarding the benefits of support groups, a study in Ghana indicated that caregivers who participated in support groups showed improved well-being through the realization of ‘I’m not alone’, improved understanding of the child’s condition, a feeling of hope and positive attitudinal changes towards their child and themselves [85]. Overall, the findings indicate that a balanced integration of formal and natural support systems could enhance caregivers’ well-being. Future interventions need to prioritize improving caregivers’ access to CBR services while recognizing natural support networks, including religious and spiritual institutions. Establishing a collaborative framework between health and rehabilitation professionals and religious leaders could provide sustainable psychological and emotional support for caregivers.

Support needs of caregivers

Financial support, adequate healthcare service, psychological support, and access to child education were the unmet support needs of caregivers. Even though caregivers want to start a small business and improve their living conditions, financial constraints are a major challenge. In the current study, most caregivers lived in impoverished conditions, with some reporting abandonment by their spouses related to their child’s disability. As a result, the priority support need was financial, aimed at economic independence and self-sufficiency. In line with our findings, a similar study in Ethiopia indicated that caregivers of children with developmental disabilities struggled to balance earning income and finding time and resources to support their children. Especially single mothers didn’t have the opportunity to work unless they carried their child to work, which placed extra demand [47]. Previous research also identified financial constraints as a major challenge for caregivers of children with disabilities in LMICs due to the high costs of care and limited resources [14,30,75,86]. Another evidence also revealed that caregiving for a child with disability places a substantial financial strain on families, contributing to increased poverty due to direct costs (e.g., medical care) and indirect costs (e.g., lost income from caregivers reducing working hours or leaving jobs) [83,87]. Evidence from South Africa suggests that financial assistance for primary caregivers of children with disabilities helps alleviate immediate financial strain for families [88]. Therefore, providing financial support, such as regular caregiver benefits and livelihood assistance, could help reduce caregivers’ economic vulnerability. Moreover, policies need to prioritize establishing and strengthening early childhood development centers and expanding CBR services to enable caregivers’ workforce participation and sustainably alleviate their financial burdens.

Our study found that the civil war in the region exacerbated caregivers’ economic difficulties. Other researchers reported similar findings highlighting how living in the areas of protracted political conflict increases the inequalities and vulnerabilities of children with disabilities and their caregivers and poses challenges that result in economic loss and diminished wellbeing [89]. A study from Israel showed that war negatively impacted not only the economic status but also psychosocial health of caregivers of children with developmental disabilities. The authors found that during wartime, there were disruptions of educational and rehabilitation services, leading to missed work, unexpected treatment costs, and increased caregiving demands, particularly impacting parents with low economic status [89,90]. Similarly, families and children with disabilities affected by armed conflict in Syria were faced significant challenges, such as losing their homes, livelihoods, and essential resources. These families struggle to meet basic needs, including food, healthcare, housing, assistive devices, medication, therapies, and transportation to access necessary services [91]. Overall, the findings of our and other studies indicate the need to safeguard essential disability-related services during periods of conflict and to provide targeted financial support to economically vulnerable caregivers.

Caregivers had unmet healthcare service needs, including a lack of comprehensive information about CP, long waiting times, unprofessional attitudes from healthcare providers, and limited access to treatments or therapies. Caregivers stated that some healthcare professionals advised them to discontinue their child’s follow-up, believing that the child would not develop further. This finding might indicate that the healthcare professionals’ attitude is shaped by the medical model of disability, focusing primarily on the child’s impairment rather than addressing the holistic and ongoing needs of both the child and caregiver. In addition, caregivers in the current study reported receiving unclear and insufficient information regarding CP, leading to confusion and wasted resources. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which found that caregivers of children with CP often felt inadequately informed and unsupported by healthcare professionals [16,92]. Moreover, negative attitudes from healthcare professionals exacerbated caregivers’ feelings of helplessness and intensified their anxieties [18]. Another study conducted in Ethiopia indicated that healthcare providers acknowledged the lack of disability-inclusive clinical care in their professional training [93]. Given that healthcare professionals are often the first point of contact for caregivers, there is a need to strengthen disability-inclusive care by providing targeted training for health providers and integrating disability-related competencies into health professional education programs. Regarding services, although multidisciplinary rehabilitation, including physical rehabilitation, orthopedic surgery, occupational therapy, and psychosocial support is required for CP management [54], caregivers in the present study reported that their children received only physical therapy. As a result, due to the lack of progress in their child’s condition, caregivers reported attending alternative healing options, such as “Holy Water”, to get a cure. This reflects caregivers’ misconceptions that CP is a curable condition through spiritual practices. Consistent with our study findings, research from Ethiopia has shown that family caregivers of people with chronic health conditions often engage in religious rituals and services to seek miraculous healing and emotional comfort [94]. Therefore, healthcare and rehabilitation professionals need to equip caregivers with clear and accessible health information about the cause and prognosis of CP through educational programs. In a similar context, educational workshops by health care professionals for caregivers of children with CP have improved caregivers’ knowledge and health outcomes for the children and their caregivers in Zimbabwe [95,96]. In addition, research has shown that multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention improved functional motor skills and quality of life, as well as social, emotional, and cognitive outcomes for children with disabilities, and also enhanced satisfaction and helped family caregivers feel more supported and empowered in their care [95,96]. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure access to multidisciplinary rehabilitation services for children with CP. Beyond the health care professionals, training religious leaders and equipping them with accurate information about CP could help address misconceptions and guide caregivers toward appropriate services, as faith leaders are important and trusted members of the community [33,97]. The World Health Organization (WHO) also recognizes the crucial role of faith leaders in supporting the spread of reliable health information and promoting positive health behaviours, specifically in LMICs [98,99].

Overall, although all caregivers in this study were enrolled in the CBR program, significant unmet needs, such as access to assistive devices, psychological support needs, and access to education for their children with CP, were reported. These substantial gaps in services raise critical questions about how the CBR program meets caregivers’ needs and what challenges CBR faces in supporting caregivers of children with CP in the Ethiopian context.

Limitations and future research directions

This study has some limitations. Despite the efforts to include fathers’ perspectives, all participants were women. Globally, CP is more prevalent among boys than girls [100103]; however, the majority of caregivers in our sample were mothers of girls with CP. Additionally, due to security concerns in the region, caregivers were recruited through the CBR program in only one city (Gondar), where the program could facilitate the recruitment process. As a result, the perspectives of caregivers who lack access to CBR services or who live in remote rural areas were not included. Future research should consider a gender-balanced sample and incorporate insights from fathers, siblings, grandparents, and caregivers from rural areas and diverse regions in Ethiopia to gain a comprehensive understanding of family caregiving for children with CP. Moreover, given the sensitive nature of the topic, which involves emotional and intimate conversations, future researchers might consider obtaining verbal consent to enhance the openness and comfort of participants.

Conclusion

The caregiving experiences of caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia are characterized by significant physical, psychosocial, and financial challenges, but also resilience. Although caregivers derive support from natural sources, such as religion/spirituality, and family, formal support systems have been found to be insufficient in meeting the needs of caregivers. There is a pressing need for interventions that address caregivers’ financial vulnerabilities, enhance access to healthcare and assistive devices, and provide targeted psychosocial support. Moreover, strengthening CBR services to meet caregivers’ multifaceted needs and designing interventions that build on caregivers’ inherent strengths and resources are essential.

The findings offer insights into caregiving challenges shared across many low- and middle-income countries. Common challenges such as limited formal support, reliance on natural support systems, unmet needs, and the negative impact on caregivers’ well-being reflect broader global experiences. The influence of cultural and spiritual beliefs underscored the importance of contextually sensitive interventions. These insights contribute to a global understanding of caregiving and could inform the development of contextual interventions to enhance caregivers’ well-being.

Supporting information

S1 File. Interview guide in English.

(DOCX)

pone.0346049.s001.docx (19.2KB, docx)
S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

pone.0346049.s002.docx (70.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our gratitude to the study participants and Mr. Zelalem Demeke, the Ethiopian representative of Enablement Foundation (formerly Cerebral Palsy Africa) and an occupational therapist at the University of Gondar, for his invaluable support in recruiting participants. We also thank CBR field workers, who played a crucial role in finding the caregivers. Furthermore, we want to thank Haymanot Ezezew, for her contribution to data collection and Adhanom Baraki (AB) for serving as a secondary coder.

Data Availability

The data consists of transcripts of the qualitative interviews with family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy and is majority in Amharic. Because there are only 13 participants, we are not permitted to include to make de-identified data available in order to protect the confidentiality of our participants. The manuscripts contained direct citations from the participants and is the data that we publicly share.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program at the University of Gondar (to MM) covering only data collection expenses but not publication fees. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

References

  • 1.Morris C. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy: a historical perspective. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:3–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12609.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation. What is cerebral palsy? 2015. https://www.cerebralpalsy.org.au/what-is-cerebral-palsy/ [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khandaker G, Muhit M, Karim T, Smithers-Sheedy H, Novak I, Jones C, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in Bangladesh: a population-based surveillance study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(5):601–9. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McIntyre S, Goldsmith S, Webb A, Ehlinger V, Hollung SJ, McConnell K, et al. Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(12):1494–506. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Chhetri AB, Smithers-Sheedy H, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in low- and middle-income countries: preliminary findings from an international multi-centre cerebral palsy register. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(11):1327–36. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsige S, Moges A, Mekasha A, Abebe W, Forssberg H. Cerebral palsy in children: subtypes, motor function and associated impairments in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-03026-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability 2011. 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lindt N, van Berkel J, Mulder BC. Determinants of overburdening among informal carers: a systematic review. Journal of Family Studies. 2023;10(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asige E, Saloojee G, Wanjala G, Andrews C, Namaganda LH, Kakooza-Mwesige A, et al. Impact of the Akwenda Intervention Program for cerebral palsy on caregiver-perceived burden, stress, and psychosocial functioning: A cluster-randomized trial in Uganda. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025;67(9):1206–16. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park E-Y, Nam S-J. Time burden of caring and depression among parents of individuals with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1508–13. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1432705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kassa T, Tadese H, Eriku GA, Abich Y, Fentanew M. Health-related quality of life and associated factors among primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy, in Bahir Dar and Gondar cities, Ethiopia, 2022. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0301050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dambi JM, Jelsma J, Mlambo T. Caring for a child with Cerebral Palsy: The experience of Zimbabwean mothers. Afr J Disabil. 2015;4(1):168. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v4i1.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahmadi Kahjoogh M, Rassafiani M, Tahmasebi A, Ahmadi Kahjoogh H, Sahaf R. The relationship between gross motor function ability and time use in mothers of children with cerebral palsy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2016;79(3):172–7. doi: 10.1177/0308022615616974 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dlamini MD, Chang Y-J, Nguyen TTB. Caregivers’ experiences of having a child with cerebral palsy. A meta-synthesis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023;73:157–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Taylor C, Badawi N, Novak I, Foster J. Caregivers’ experiences of feeding children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evid Synth. 2025;23(4):704–55. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elangkovan I, Shorey S. Experiences and needs of parents caring for children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2020;41:730–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith M, Blamires J. Mothers’ experience of having a child with cerebral palsy. A systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;64:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Raina P, O’Donnell M, Schwellnus H, Rosenbaum P, King G, Brehaut J. Caregiving burden and caregiving stress CF to guide research. 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang M, Brown R. Family quality of life: a framework for policy and social service provisions to support families of children with disabilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 2009;12(2):144–67. 10.1080/10522150902874842 [DOI]
  • 22.O’Neill M, Bourke-Taylor H, Bhopti A, Cotter C. The experiences of families of children with cerebral palsy and complex disability after three years accessing the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Aust Occup Ther J. 2024;71(6):910–24. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hill K. Respite services for children with life-limiting conditions and their families in Ireland. Nurs Child Young People. 2016;28(10):30–5. doi: 10.7748/ncyp.2016.e658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Davis E, Shelly A, Waters E, Boyd R, Cook K, Davern M, et al. The impact of caring for a child with cerebral palsy: quality of life for mothers and fathers. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(1):63–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00989.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hastings R, Taunt H. Positive perceptions in families of children with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2002;107(2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alaee N, Shahboulaghi FM, Khankeh H, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S. Psychosocial Challenges for Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study. J Child Fam Stud. 2014;24(7):2147–54. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-0016-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang Y-P, Kellett U, St John W. Being concerned: caregiving for Taiwanese mothers of a child with cerebral palsy. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(1–2):189–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03741.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chiluba BC, Moyo G. Caring for a cerebral palsy child: a caregivers perspective at the University Teaching Hospital, Zambia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3011-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gona JK, Newton CR, Rimba KK, Mapenzi R, Kihara M, Vijver FV, et al. Challenges and coping strategies of parents of children with autism on the Kenyan coast. Rural Remote Health. 2016;16(2):3517. doi: 10.22605/rrh3517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Madzhie M, Mphephu KE, Baloyi V, Chueng M. The challenges experienced by mothers with children suffering from cerebral palsy: A study conducted at Mutale Municipality, South Africa. Cogent Psychology. 2022;9(1). doi: 10.1080/23311908.2022.2043020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nyante GG, Carpenter C. The experience of carers of children with cerebral palsy living in rural areas of Ghana who have received no rehabilitation services: A qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(6):815–22. doi: 10.1111/cch.12706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zuurmond M, Seeley J, Nyant GG, Baltussen M, Abanga J, Polack S, et al. Exploring caregiver experiences of stigma in Ghana:They insult me because of my child. Disability & Society. 2020;37(5):827–48. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2020.1851172 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tekola B, Kinfe M, Girma Bayouh F, Hanlon C, Hoekstra RA. The experiences of parents raising children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia. Autism. 2023;27(2):539–51. doi: 10.1177/13623613221105085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nimbalkar S, Raithatha S, Shah R, Panchal DA. A Qualitative Study of Psychosocial Problems among Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy Attending Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Western India. ISRN Family Med. 2014;2014:769619. doi: 10.1155/2014/769619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dako-Gyeke M, Boateng DA, Mills AA, Kodom RB, Appiah-Kubi J. Known by the Children’s Condition: Associative Stigma Among Family Carers of Children with Cerebral Palsy. Glob Soc Welf. 2021;8(4):379–92. doi: 10.1007/s40609-021-00203-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ribeiro MFM, Vandenberghe L, Prudente COM, Vila V da SC, Porto CC. Cerebral Palsy: how the child’s age and severity of impairment affect the mother’s stress and coping strategies. Cien Saude Colet. 2016;21(10):3203–12. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320152110.17352016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Loutou A, Soudé R, Gandonou E, Kpadonou T, Sogbossi ES. Social support, depression, and quality of life among parents of children with cerebral palsy in Benin, West Africa: a cross-sectional case-control study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2025;48(2):113–9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Melak M, Fakolade A, Mekonnen S, Baraki A, Ross-White A, Batorowicz B. The state of evidence on the health outcomes and support needs of family caregivers of children with Cerebral Palsy in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(21):5435–50. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2472984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Karbo T. Religion and social cohesion in Ethiopia. Int J Peace and Dev Stud. 2013;4(3):43–52. doi: 10.5897/ijpds2013.0164 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.UNDP. Ethiopia-Working Paper Series: Crisis, Resilience and Opportunity: Poverty, Human Development, and the Macro-Economy in Ethiopia, 2020-23. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tefera B, Schippers A, Van Engen M, Van der Klink J. The experiences of children with disabilities and primary caregivers on the social inclusion of children with disabilities in Ethiopia. IJCYFS. 2018;9(4):146–67. doi: 10.18357/ijcyfs94201818645 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Atnafu DD, Kuper H, Mbazzi FB. Left behind in primary healthcare: A qualitative exploration of healthcare experiences of people with disabilities in Ethiopia. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025;5(9):e0005147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Asres GW. The practices of community-based rehabilitation program for people with disabilities for inclusive development, Ethiopia. Not specified. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Taddese ET, Gebresilase BM, Aboudahr SMFM, Dinsa MT, Aslam S. The practice of inclusive education in Central Ethiopia Regional State: a case study of primary schools. Education 3-13. 2025;:1–14. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2024.2449462 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jansen-van Vuuren J, Dawud S, Lysaght R, Batorowicz B, Aldersey HM. Family quality of life and children with disability in Ethiopia: The role of support providers. Journal of Family Studies. 2023;45:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aldersey HM, Ahmed AN, Tesfamichael HN, Lotoski N. Needs of families of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Addis Ababa. Afr J Disabil. 2020;9:735. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Szlamka Z, Ahmed I, Genovesi E, Kinfe M, Hoekstra RA, Hanlon C. Conceptualising the empowerment of caregivers raising children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):1420. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10428-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hunter D, McCallum J, Howes D. Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. JNHC. 2019;4. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.United Nation. Ethiopia Population 1950-2025. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Crivello G, Boyden J, Pankhurst A. Motherhood in childhood: generational change in Ethiopia. A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics. 2019;3:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tekola B, Kinfe M, Girma F, Hanlon C, Hoekstra RA. Perceptions and experiences of stigma among parents of children with developmental disorders in Ethiopia: A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2020;256:113034. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tilahun D, Hanlon C, Fekadu A, Tekola B, Baheretibeb Y, Hoekstra RA. Stigma, explanatory models and unmet needs of caregivers of children with developmental disorders in a low-income African country: a cross-sectional facility-based survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1383-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Health Sector Transformation Plan II. Ethiopia: Ethiopia Mo. Health. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tiruneh BT, McLelland G, Plummer V. National Healthcare System Development of Ethiopia: A Systematic Narrative Review. Hosp Top. 2020;98(2):37–44. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2020.1750323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.WHO. Community Based Rehabilitation. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ministry of Health. National Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Services Management Guideline. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liamputtong P. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences.Singapore: Springer Nature. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019;13(2):201–16. doi: 10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019;11(4):589–97. doi: 10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant. 2021;56(3):1391–412. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.QSR International. NVivo 14: Qualitative Data Analysis Software. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Research Designs. 2012. 57–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lincoln S, Guba G. Naturalistic inquiry. Publications S. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stall N, Shah N, Bhushan D. Unpaid Family Caregiving—The Next Frontier of Gender Equity in a postpandemic future. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bhan N, Rao N, Raj A. Gender differences in the associations between informal caregiving and wellbeing in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;29(10):1328–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Desta CG. Resources, Time and Gender: Determinants of Women’s Housework in Bahir Dar and Nearby Rural Villages, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Family Issues. 2019;41(4):507–41. doi: 10.1177/0192513x19878862 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Canada GO. Canada’s feminist approach to addressing unpaid and paid care work through international assistance. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Alqahtani A, Sahely A, Aldersey HM, Finlayson M, Macdonald D, Fakolade A. Understanding the Parental Caregiving of Children with Cerebral Palsy in Saudi Arabia: Discovering the Untold Story. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(6):946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Vadivelan K, Sekar P, Sruthi SS, Gopichandran V. Burden of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: an intersectional analysis of gender, poverty, stigma, and public policy. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08808-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Patel P, Baier J, Baranov E, Khurana E, Gambrah-Sampaney C, Johnson A, et al. Health beliefs regarding pediatric cerebral palsy among caregivers in Botswana: A qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2017;43(6):861–8. doi: 10.1111/cch.12490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bentum LS, Ohene LA, Agyare VA, Laari L, Ampomah MO. Fathers’ experiences of caring for children living with cerebral palsy: A qualitative study in a low resourced socioeconomic context, Ghana. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Manyuma D, Maluleke M, Raliphaswa NS, Masutha TC, Rangwaneni ME, Thabathi TE, et al. Title: Caring for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Challenge to Caregivers in Rural Areas of South Africa. Children (Basel). 2023;10(3):440. doi: 10.3390/children10030440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nyante GG, Carpenter C. The experience of carers of children with cerebral palsy living in rural areas of Ghana who have received no rehabilitation services: A qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(6):815–22. doi: 10.1111/cch.12706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Franck B, Joshi DK. Including students with disabilities in Education for All: lessons from Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2016;21(4):347–60. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2016.1197320 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Okyere C, Aldersey HM, Lysaght R, Sulaiman SK.  Implementation of inclusive education for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities in African countries: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2019;41(21):2578–95. 10.1080/09638288.2018.1465132 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 80.Tegegne KT, Chalachew AA, Abebe MT, Wudu TK, Melese AD, Tegegne ET, et al. Psychosocial impact on parents Raising children with cerebral palsy at Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Neurol. 2025;25(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04397-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ogwumike O, Adeniyi A, Kaka B, Badaru U. Psychosocial adversities and depression in mothers of children with cerebral palsy in Nigeria. J Pediatr Neurol. 2015;11(01):001–7. doi: 10.3233/jpn-120593 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Jansen-van Vuuren J, Lysaght R, Batorowicz B, Dawud S, Aldersey HM. Family Quality of Life and Support: Perceptions of Family Members of Children with Disabilities in Ethiopia. Disabilities. 2021;1(3):233–56. doi: 10.3390/disabilities1030018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Karaca A, Konuk Şener D. Spirituality as a coping method for mothers of children with developmental disabilities. Int J Dev Disabil. 2019;67(2):112–20. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1603730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dindar M, Rahnama M, Afshari M, Moghadam MP. The Effects of Spiritual Self-Care Training on Caregiving Strain in Mothers of Mentally Retarded Children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(12):QC01–5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23844.8948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zuurmond M, Nyante G, Baltussen M, Seeley J, Abanga J, Shakespeare T, et al. A support programme for caregivers of children with disabilities in Ghana: Understanding the impact on the wellbeing of caregivers. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(1):45–53. doi: 10.1111/cch.12618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kyeremateng JDA, Edusei A, Dogbe JA, Opoku MP, Nketsia W, Hammond C, et al. Experiences of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy across the trajectory of diagnoses in Ghana. Afr J Disabil. 2019;8:577. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Boat F, Wu T. Mental disorders and disabilities among low-income children. 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Trafford Z, Swartz L. The Care Dependency Grant for children with disabilities in South Africa: perspectives from implementation officials. Dev South Afr. 2023;40(2):259–72. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2021.1981250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Karni‐Visel Y, Roth D, Ali‐Saleh Darawshy N, Schertz M. Quality of life between the hammer and the anvil: Challenges of living with a disability in areas of protracted political conflict. Policy Practice Intel Disabi. 2023;21(1). doi: 10.1111/jppi.12472 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Karni-Visel Y, Roth D, Lev S, Werbeloff N. Quality of life and mental health in families of children with developmental disabilities during wartime. Psychol Trauma. 2025;17(7):1434–42. doi: 10.1037/tra0001941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ćerimović E. At risk and overlooked: Children with disabilities and armed conflict. Int rev Red Cross. 2022;105(922):192–216. doi: 10.1017/s181638312200087x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mwinbam MM, Suglo JN, Agyeman YN, Kukeba MW. Family caregivers’ experience of care with a child with cerebral palsy: the lived experiences and challenges of caregivers in a resource-limited setting in northern Ghana. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7(1):e001807. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Damtew B, Yigezu M. Perspectives of care providers on obstacles to healthcare access for people with disabilities in Ethiopia: a qualitative investigation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11822-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fikre K. Religion as a Functional Equivalent of Medicine: Religious Experiences of Family Caregivers of People with Chronic Illnesses in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Relig Health. 2025;:10.1007/s10943-024-02229–8. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02229-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Parrish J, Chmielewska N, Bentley K. The Importance of the Multidisciplinary Team and Social Support in Pediatric Rehabilitation: A Literature Review. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2025;13(1). doi: 10.1007/s40141-025-00487-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ngubane M, Chetty V. Caregiver satisfaction with a multidisciplinary community-based rehabilitation programme for children with cerebral palsy in South Africa. S Afr Fam Pract. 2017;59(2):48. doi: 10.4102/safp.v59i1.4657 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Robinson E. Religious leaders as health educators: a pilot project in Northern Ethiopia. Annals of Global Health. 2015;81(1):168. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.02.883 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hartley S, Ojwang P, Baguwemu A, Ddamulira M, Chavuta A. How do carers of disabled children cope? The Ugandan perspective. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31(2):167–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00464.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.WHO. Strengthening partnerships with the faith community. 2026. https://www.who.int/activities/strengthening-partnerships-with-the-faith-community/1000 [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yang S, Xia J, Gao J, Wang L. Increasing prevalence of cerebral palsy among children and adolescents in China 1988-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(5):jrm00195. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ahmed A, Rosella LC, Oskoui M, Watson T, Yang S. Prevalence and temporal trends of cerebral palsy in children born from 2002 to 2017 in Ontario, Canada: Population-based cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(2):243–53. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Yeargin-Allsopp M, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Durkin MS. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in 8-year-old children in three areas of the United States in 2002: a multisite collaboration. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):547–54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chounti A, Hägglund G, Wagner P, Westbom L. Sex differences in cerebral palsy incidence and functional ability: a total population study. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(7):712–7. doi: 10.1111/apa.12240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michal Soffer

5 Jun 2025

PONE-D-25-19589

“It Feels Like My Spine is About to Break”: Experience and Support Needs of Family Caregivers of Children with Cerebral Palsy in Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Melak,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 20 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols....

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michal Soffer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf....

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met. Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

3. Please remove all personal information, ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set.

Note: spreadsheet columns with personal information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.

Additional guidance on preparing raw data for publication can be found in our Data Policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data) and in the following article: http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long....

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript addressing the caregiving experiences of mothers of children with cerebral palsy (CP) in Ethiopia. Findings are important and interesting, shedding light on the lived realities of caregivers in a significantly under-researched context.

Below, I offer several comments and suggestions aimed at further strengthening the manuscript:

1. Literature Review and Framing:

- It would be helpful to distinguish more clearly between findings from HICs and LMICs, both in the introduction and the discussion sections.

- The rationale for the importance of conducting the study in Ethiopia could be expanded and would help justify the study more fully.

- Please clarify whether institutionalization or abandonment of children with CP is prevalent in the Ethiopian context. Since this option was mentioned by some mothers during the interviews, further contextualization would help the reader understand whether this reflects a broader social reality or isolated perceptions.

2. Methods:

- The methodology section is well written, but the introduction could briefly preview the sampling rationale and characteristics (e.g., severe CP, broad age range).

- Further details on the recruitment process (e.g., how caregivers were contacted) would enhance transparency.

- Are any of the children dependent on medical equipment (e.g., respiratory devices)?

- The setting description could be streamlined for focus and clarity.

- Please provide more context for the use of the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome, which informs the interview guide.

- Consider explaining the predominance of girls with CP in the sample, in contrast with general statistics.

3. Findings:

Where possible, quantify or summarize the prevalence of key themes (e.g., “most parents reported…”), which can help convey the relative weight of each theme and guide the reader through the findings.

In the section on acceptance and spirituality, some subthemes could be grouped under coping. Consider avoiding repetition of quotes or phrasing (e.g., regarding emotional growth or stigma).

When referring to “natural support,” acknowledge that the same support sources may also cause distress, as was reflected earlier in the findings.

4. Discussion:

• The discussion would benefit from clearer articulation of how formal and natural support systems can be balanced.

• The finding that most children were not enrolled in any educational framework deserves further attention. Is this reflective of systemic issues or specific to the sample?

• I recommend that the gendered dimension of caregiving be highlighted more strongly. Since almost all caregivers were mothers, this calls for greater attention to gender-based inequities in care work, and the specific burdens mothers face in resource-limited settings.

• Clarifying the practical relevance of the findings and their significance in the context of global caregiving challenges would help international readers better appreciate the contribution of the study.

• please note that functional classifications such as GMFCS and MACS were determined by parents rather than clinicians, which may limit the precision of these measures.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for submitting the manuscript for my review. The manuscript essentially meets the seven publication criteria required by PLOS ONE. I will first present the strengths of the manuscript’s content, followed by a discussion of its weaker aspects.

The main value of the manuscript submitted for review lies in its empirical foundation: sociological qualitative research on the experiences of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in Ethiopia.

1. Appropriateness of the methodological approach – the use of an exploratory, descriptive qualitative approach is well justified by the authors. The study addresses a topic that remains underexplored in the Ethiopian context.

2. Well-described data analysis – the use of reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke), along with a clear description of the coding stages and collaboration with multiple researchers, makes the analysis reliable and trustworthy.

3. Attention to the ethical dimension of the research – the authors ensured the approval of ethics committees, transparency in the recruitment process, and sensitivity to the symbolic competence level of the participants.

4. The efforts made by the authors/researchers to ensure the trustworthiness of the presented data – credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability also deserve recognition.

5. The study is grounded in a thoroughly presented socio-cultural context – including the role of religion, traditional gender roles, and spiritual beliefs about disability – as well as in the context of Ethiopia's healthcare system. This allows deeper understanding of the caregivers' situation and enriches the analysis.

6. The structure of the presentation of research findings is logical, clear, and well-organized.

7. It is worth noting that the authors are familiar with the socio-medical concept of “success in illness”, which allowed them to include the caregivers’ positive experiences in their analysis. This balanced approach to the caregivers’ experiences should be recognized and appreciated.

8. The Discussion section is very well written – it demonstrates strong links to the literature, includes critical reflection, and clearly outlines practical implications proposed by the authors.

I will now present the weaker aspects of the manuscript and the research described within it.

Materials and Methods

1. There is no justification provided for the number of study participants (N = 13). The concern is not about the relatively small sample size itself – qualitative methodology does not require large samples – but rather about whether data saturation was achieved. What determined the decision to stop including additional caregivers in the study? According to qualitative methodological standards, this decision should be based on theoretical saturation of the collected material – that is, the point at which no new categories emerge from additional data. Was this the case in the present study? It remains unclear whether and how saturation was reached. The mention of "information power" is vague and does not clarify this point.

2. My next concern relates to the lack of anonymity in the study. The participants may not have perceived their participation as anonymous or confidential, given that they were required to sign written consent forms containing identifying information. This procedure may have reduced the participants’ openness during the interview and weakened the level of trust toward the researcher. Although the consent forms were later anonymized and the participants were assigned numerical identifiers, the act of signing one’s name is not a neutral action – especially when the interview involves emotional, intimate, and difficult topics. For this type of research, verbal consent – recorded together with the interview – would have been more appropriate.

3. The research tool attached (Appendix 1) includes only broadly formulated questions. There is no indication of any follow-up or probing questions the researcher used to explore specific topics in depth.

Findings

4. I have reservations about the way the research findings are presented. Here we have an abundance of quotes and very modest, shallow interpretations by the authors (especially in Topic 1). Although the use of the participants’ direct statements strengthens credibility, deepens the analysis, and superbly illustrates the emotions and context, the authors’ commentary is too sparse and lacks analytical depth. Description clearly dominates here, without deeper conceptualizations. The interpretative potential of the collected qualitative material should be utilized more thoroughly.

5. The presented research findings also lack individual differences, descriptions of various cases beyond the main themes, which contradicts the standards for reporting qualitative data (e.g., COREQ checklist, 2007, item 32). The caregivers’ experiences may vary depending on the sociodemographic characteristics, family situation, or attitude toward religion. While reading the findings, I wondered about the answers to the following questions: Does the level of caregivers’ education influence their understanding of the diagnosis? Does the family situation (e.g. divorce) affect the adaptation process to the child’s disability? Does having more children influence the process of coming/the ability to come to terms with the child’s illness? Was faith in God a facilitating factor in coping with the child’s disability for every caregiver? Was this true for every caregiver who declared themselves as Orthodox Christians? In the context of care for a child with CP, does the birth order of the affected child matter? Did the ongoing civil war in the study region (Amhara) impact the participants’ experiences (for example, through worsening of their economic situation and causing additional stress)? I am convinced that data on secondary themes/experiences of the caregivers could make the analyses more diverse and even more interesting. Highlighting individual differences could successfully broaden and deepen the authors’ interpretations, as qualitative research is not about just citing respondent statements, which in the text are numerous, lengthy, and therefore overrepresented.

6. The analysis of the empirical material could be deepened by incorporating field notes, which the authors only briefly mention. From the text, we know that the researcher made them after the interviews, but we do not know whether their content was consistent with the interviews. I am curious if they included the researcher’s observations regarding the caregivers’ health functioning (visible spinal problems, possible difficulties with walking, or overall physical fitness). How does the lack of assistive equipment (e.g. standing frames, hoists) affect the caregivers’ physical health? It is impossible to conduct an interview without also performing participant observation.

I assess the text as valuable. The presented research findings identifying the specific needs of caregivers of children with CP are very interesting and undoubtedly have practical value for designing support for this group of parents in Ethiopia. In my opinion, the authors should be given the opportunity to publish the text after implementing the recommended corrections and addressing the above remarks.

Recommendations for Development of the Research Project:

1. Due to the highly diverse social structure of Ethiopia, in my opinion, the research should be continued and extended to rural populations or other regions of the country. The recruitment was limited to participants from a city covered by a single CBR program (Gondar), which weakens the transferability of the results.

2. Although mothers are the main caregivers, their exclusive participation may limit insight into family care processes. The study could benefit from including fathers, grandparents, or siblings of children with CP.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy....

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2026 Apr 13;21(4):e0346049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346049.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


28 Aug 2025

Date: 2025/08/22

To: Editor, PLOS ONE

Response to reviewers’ comments

We would like to thank you and the reviewers for the valuable feedback on ways to improve and strengthen our manuscript, titled: “It Feels Like My Spine is About to Break”: Experience and Support Needs of Family Caregivers of Children with Cerebral Palsy in Ethiopia. Below, we respond to each point raised by the reviewers, indicating any changes and their location in the manuscript with track changes. We have also attached a clean manuscript without track changes. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your response.

Reviewer One

1. Literature review and Framing:

It would be helpful to distinguish more clearly between findings from HICs and LMICs, both in the introduction and the discussion sections.

Thank you for your valuable feedback. We have revised the introduction as you suggested and presented the findings for HICs and LMICs separately. (Page 4-5/line 77-99)

The rationale for the importance of conducting the study in Ethiopia could be expanded and would help justify the study more fully.

Comment accepted and we revised the rationale to as follows: “A recent scoping review on the health outcomes and support needs of caregivers of children with CP in SSA highlighted a lack of research from Ethiopia, despite a growing body of evidence in the region (Melak et al., 2025). While previous studies from other countries could provide some insight, the unique socio-cultural and economic factors, such as the spiritual and collectivist nature of Ethiopian society (Karbo, 2013), multidimensional poverty (UNDP., 2022a), and stigma (Zuurmond et al, 2022) might influence the caregiving experience differently. Moreover, the limited availability of disability services and formal caregiving support systems in Ethiopia could impact caregiving for children with CP. To address this knowledge gap, the current study explored the caregiving experiences and support needs of family caregivers for children with CP in Ethiopia. Such a study is needed to provide a foundational evidence base to inform future research, as well as give insight into the design of relevant policies and support interventions tailored to the specific needs and realities of caregivers of children with CP in Ethiopia.” (Page 5-6/line 105-118)

Please clarify whether institutionalization or abandonment of children with CP is prevalent in the Ethiopian context. Since this option was mentioned by some mothers during the interviews, further contextualization would help the reader understand whether this reflects a broader social reality or isolated perceptions.

We appreciate your concern. We want to clarify that while some of our participants noted that they were initially considering the option of placing their child for adoption upon learning about their child's condition for the first time, they explained that this their initial reaction, largely due to a lack of information and support. However, none of the participants ultimately pursued this option; instead, they came to view their child's condition as a gift from God over time. Furthermore, we found no evidence of abandonment among children with CP within the Ethiopian context. (Page 17/line 309-312)

2. Method:

The methodology section is well written, but the introduction could briefly preview the sampling rationale and characteristics (e.g., severe CP, broad age range).

Comment accepted, and we edited accordingly: “Evidence showed that the most significant predictors of caregiver burden were the duration of caregiving and the level of dependency of the care recipient (Lindt et al.). Caregivers of children with CP were found to spend, on average, 15 hours per day in Turkey (Park & Nam, 2019) and 21.3 hours per day in Ethiopia (Kassa et al., 2024) on caregiving activities. Furthermore, mothers of children with CP with higher scores on the GMFCS tend to spend more time on caregiving than mothers of children with lower GMFCS scores (Ahmadi Kahjoogh et al., 2016). They also experience higher levels of stress due to increased caregiving demands, health concerns, and potential developmental delays. Similarly, as the child with CP gets older and heavier, the physical demand placed on caregivers also increases (Dambi et al., 2015).” (Page 3/ line 63-64 & page 4/ line 67-71)

Further details on the recruitment process (e.g., how caregivers were contacted) would enhance transparency.

Based on your suggestion, we added the following: “Caregivers who were recruited for the study were contacted by CBR field workers to inquire about their willingness to participate in the research.” (Page 8/ line 183-185)

Are any of the children dependent on medical equipment (e.g., respiratory devices)?

No, none of the caregivers had a child with CP who uses medical equipment such as a respiratory device.

The setting description could be streamlined for focus and clarity.

We appreciate the feedback. We kept it as it was, as we think that offering a detailed description of the study setting is important to help readers better contextualize the findings and assess their potential transferability to similar settings.

Please provide more context for the use of the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome, which informs the interview guide.

We accepted the comment, and we have edited as follows to provide more context: “The interview guide was developed based on the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome, developed by Raina et al. (2004), which provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between various factors that influence the caregiving experience. This model highlights how background/contextual factors (e.g., socioeconomic status), caregiver strain, intrapsychic factors and coping factors interact to affect caregiver outcomes such as physical and psychological health. The model informed the development of the interview guide, helping us identify key areas to explore, including caregivers’ day-to-day experiences, challenges, coping strategies, available support systems, and the broader contextual influences on caregiving” (Page 13/ line 206-213)

Consider explaining the predominance of girls with CP in the sample, in contrast with general statistics.

Thank you for your suggestion. We added this under the limitations of the study: “Globally, CP is more prevalent among boys than girls (Ahmed et al., 2023; Chounti et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2021; Yeargin-Allsopp et al., 2008); however, the majority of caregivers in our sample were mothers of girls with CP. Future research should consider a gender-balanced sample and incorporate insights from fathers, siblings, grandparents, and caregivers from rural areas and diverse regions in Ethiopia to gain a comprehensive understanding of family caregiving for children with CP”. (Page 41/ line 872-873 & Page 42/ line 877-879)

3. Findings: Where possible, quantify or summarize the prevalence of key themes (e.g., “most parents reported…”), which can help convey the relative weight of each theme and guide the reader through the findings.

Thank you for your feedback. While we acknowledge the value of knowing the prevalence, we want to clarify that for this study, we followed the specific approach of reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2019, 2020). To make our work congruent with this approach, we generated rich, nuanced accounts of meaning rather than measured or quantified theme frequency. RTA views themes as patterns of shared meaning, rather than categories to be counted (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2019, 2020).

In the section on acceptance and spirituality, some subthemes could be grouped under coping. Consider avoiding repetition of quotes or phrasing (e.g., regarding emotional growth or stigma).

We greatly appreciate your feedback and noticing some repetition. We have now integrated/moved the acceptance subtheme into the natural support subtheme, specifically integrating with the findings of spirituality as coping, as caregivers cited religion and spirituality as their reasons for accepting their child's condition. (Page 31/ line 617-635)

When referring to “natural support,” acknowledge that the same support sources may also cause distress, as was reflected earlier in the findings.

We appreciate the feedback. We edited accordingly: From: “Caregivers received physical, informational, and emotional support from their natural support systems, such as family, friends, and neighbours.”

To: “Caregivers received physical, informational, and emotional support from their natural support systems, such as family, friends, and neighbours. However, the same support sources were reported as a source of distress in the earlier findings.” (Page 29/ line 573-575)

4. Discussion:

The discussion would benefit from clearer articulation of how formal and natural support systems can be balanced.

We appreciate the suggestion. We have revised the discussion section:

From: “The findings of the current study imply that a balanced formal and natural support could enhance the positive experience of caregivers of children with CP.”

To: “The findings of the current study suggest that a balanced integration of formal and natural support could enhance caregivers' positive experiences. Therefore, it is crucial to improve the accessibility and availability of CBR support services. Recognizing the role of natural support systems and the roles of religion and spirituality in addressing the psychological and emotional needs of caregivers could have a sustainable impact on the well-being of caregivers. Therefore, fostering a system of collaboration between health professionals and religious leaders is vital.” (Page 39/ line 814-820)

The finding that most children were not enrolled in any educational framework deserves further attention. Is this reflective of systemic issues or specific to the sample?

Comment accepted and revision has been made accordingly. We have added to the discussion section as follows: “Moreover, Ethiopia’s commitment to inclusive education is affirmed in its ratification of CRPD. In contrast to this, in the current study, among the 13 children with CP, only one child was enrolled in school. This reflects the systemic issue rooted in structural, economic, and attitudinal barriers to inclusive education (Franck & Joshi, 2017; Tekola et al., 2020), where only 11% of children with special needs are enrolled in primary education and 2.8% in secondary education in Ethiopia (ESDP, 2021). Research evidence also shows that there is limited acceptance and retention of children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia’s mainstream schools as compared to other disabilities due to their requirement of additional support (Okyere et al.; Tilahun et al., 2016). This evidence implies that the underdeveloped social services and systemic challenges impose an additional burden on caregivers. Therefore, the evidence highlights the urgent need for the full implementation of CRPD to enhance access to assistive technology, improve the accessibility of physical environments, and promote inclusive education, ultimately reducing the physical strain on caregivers.” (Page 38/ line 779-791)

I recommend that the gendered dimension of caregiving be highlighted more strongly. Since almost all caregivers were mothers, this calls for greater attention to gender-based inequities in care work, and the specific burdens mothers face in resource-limited settings.

Recommendation accepted, and we have added to the discussion section as follows: “Globally, deep-rooted gender norms result in family caregiving still being widely perceived as women’s work (Stall et al., 2023). As a result, women currently perform up to 81% of unpaid caregiver roles worldwide (Bhan et al., 2020). In the current study, all caregivers were women who assumed the responsibility of meeting their children's daily needs, managing household chores, and sometimes serving as the primary breadwinners. This finding highlights that caregiving responsibilities disproportionately fall on women, emphasizing that future interventions should consider the gendered inequities involved in caring for children with CP. Contrary to our finding, a recent study conducted in Saudi Arabia found that caregiving for children with CP was shared between fathers and mothers, indicating a shift from the traditional view of women as the primary caregivers (Alqahtani et al., 2025). ” (Page 37/ line 755-763)

Clarifying the practical relevance of the findings and their significance in the context of global caregiving challenges would help international readers better appreciate the contribution of the study.

Thank you for the feedback. We added the following to the conclusion:

“The findings offer insights into caregiving challenges shared across many low- and middle-income countries. Common challenges such as limited formal support, reliance on natural support systems, unmet needs and negative impact on the well-being of caregivers reflect broader global experiences. The influence of cultural and spiritual beliefs underscored the importance of contextually sensitive interventions. These insights contribute to a global understanding of caregiving and can inform the development of context-responsive policies and support practices.” (Page 42/ line 893-898)

Please note that functional classifications such as GMFCS and MACS were determined by parents rather than clinicians, which may limit the precision of these measures.

Although GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS classifications were based on caregivers’ perceptions, we minimized potential misclassification by providing clear guidance on the meaning of each level.

We have modified from: GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS tools were used to classify the functional ability of children with CP as perceived by caregivers.

To this: GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS tools were used to classify the functional abilities of children with CP based on caregivers’ perceptions, with guidance provided on the meaning of each level. (Page 9/ line 202-203)

Reviewer 2

Materials and Methods

1.There is no justification provided for the number of study participants (N = 13). The concern is not about the relatively small sample size itself – qualitative methodology does not require large samples – but rather about whether data saturation was achieved. What determined the decision to stop including additional caregivers in the study? According to qualitative methodological standards, this decision should be based on theoretical saturation of the collected material – that is, the point at which no new categories emerge from additional data. Was this the case in the present study? It remains unclear whether and how saturation was reached. The mention of "information power" is vague and does not clarify this point.

We greatly appreciate the concern. To clarify, consistent with our approach (exploratory qualitative descriptive), we were guided by the model of information power (the more relevant information a sample holds, the fewer participants are needed) (Malterud et al., 2015) to determine the adequacy of sample size. This model suggests that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on the study's aim, sample specificity, use of established theory, quality of dialogue, and analysis strategy. Our study had a focused aim, the sample was specific, the interview guide was informed by the Multidimensional Model of Caregiving Process and Outcome, and interviews were conducted in-depth by an experienced interviewer in the participants’ native language, Amharic. These characteristics align with the principles of information power, making a sample size of 13 sufficient to address the research question.

2. My next concern relates to the lack of anonymity in the study. The participants may not have perceived their participation as anonymous or confidential, given that they were required to sign written consent forms containing identifying information. This procedure may have reduced the participants’ openness during the interview and weakened the level of trust toward the researcher. Although the consent forms were later anonymized and the participants were assigned numerical identifie

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response letter-PLOSONE-reviewers.docx

pone.0346049.s004.docx (58.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Johanna Pruller

6 Oct 2025

Dear Dr. Melak,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers, and their comments are available below. The reviewers have raised a number of concerns that need attention. Could you please revise the manuscript to carefully address the concerns raised?

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 16 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols....

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Johanna Pruller, Ph.D.

Senior Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: I would like to thank you again for the opportunity to review this revised manuscript. The authors have seriously and thoughtfully addressed the comments raised in the previous review round, and the revisions have considerably strengthened the paper. At the same time, I believe there remain several areas that would benefit from further clarification and elaboration:

1. Authers stated that "While previous studies from other countries could provide some insight, the unique socio-cultural and economic factors, such as the spiritual and collectivist nature of Ethiopian society (Karbo, 2013), multidimensional poverty (UNDP., 2022a), and stigma (Zuurmond et al, 2022) might influence the caregiving experience differently"- the term “stigma” remains too general and vague. It would be helpful to clarify what kind of stigma is referred to, and to whom.

2. Disability services and formal caregiving support – The mention of the limited availability of services and support systems in Ethiopia is important, but somewhat underdeveloped. I encourage the authors to either provide supporting references or expand on concrete details regarding the types of services lacking and how this impacts caregiving for children with CP.

3. Impact of conflict and instability – The authors added valuable examples of how the ongoing conflict and instability in the region affect economic challenges. However, I wondered whether there are more specific examples relevant to caregiving itself (e.g., access to rehabilitation, transportation difficulties, or disruptions to medical or educational services).

4. Moreover, if the authors address the critical nuance of caregiving in a conflict zone (which I think adds complexity and relevance), I recommend expanding the background and/or discussion to include theoretical or empirical literature on the impact of protracted political conflict or war on quality of life and caregiving for children with disabilities, including CP. This would add depth and situate the findings within a broader scholarly framework.

Reviewer #2: The author responded to all comments in a thorough and systematic manner, citing relevant literature and revising the manuscript to address missing elements (e.g., probing questions, explanation of limitations, the role of field notes, and the impact of regional conflict). It is clear that all issues raised by the reviewer were taken seriously and are reflected in the revised version of the manuscript.

Strengths of the response:

Clear reference to each comment,

Implementation of changes in the manuscript according to the reviewer’s suggestions,

Deep reflection on ethical procedures,

Expanded methodology section and discussion of study limitations.

Weaknesses:

No explicit statement that data saturation was achieved; instead, the author relies solely on the concept of “information power,” which does not fully meet the reviewer’s expectations,

Limited response to concerns about “shallow interpretation”—rather than deepening the analysis, the author primarily defended the chosen methodological approach (exploratory-descriptive).

Recommendation:

The responses are convincing and should satisfy the editors; however, it may be worth considering:

Adding a brief note stating that after a certain number of interviews no new categories emerged (which would suggest that saturation was indeed achieved),

Adding 2–3 additional sentences in the discussion to further elaborate on interpretation, for example by linking the findings to the broader literature to demonstrate that the analytical potential of the data was fully utilized within the chosen approach.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy..-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2026 Apr 13;21(4):e0346049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346049.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


2 Dec 2025

Reviewer #1

1. Authers stated that "While previous studies from other countries could provide some insight, the unique socio-cultural and economic factors, such as the spiritual and collectivist nature of Ethiopian society (Karbo, 2013), multidimensional poverty (UNDP., 2022a), and stigma (Zuurmond et al, 2022) might influence the caregiving experience differently"- the term “stigma” remains too general and vague. It would be helpful to clarify what kind of stigma is referred to, and to whom.

Response: Thank you for the constructive feedback, we have made revisions accordingly.(In clean manuscriptPage 5/ line 96)

2. Disability services and formal caregiving support – The mention of the limited availability of services and support systems in Ethiopia is important, but somewhat underdeveloped. I encourage the authors to either provide supporting references or expand on concrete details regarding the types of services lacking and how this impacts caregiving for children with CP.

Response: Thank you for the valuable feedback! We have added details about the types of services with supporting references.(Page 5/from line 98-102)

3. Impact of conflict and instability – The authors added valuable examples of how the ongoing conflict and instability in the region affect economic challenges. However, I wondered whether there are more specific examples relevant to caregiving itself (e.g., access to rehabilitation, transportation difficulties, or disruptions to medical or educational services).

Response: Thank you for your relevant feedback. However, aside from economic challenges, we did not find additional conflict-related caregiving experiences in our data.

4. Moreover, if the authors address the critical nuance of caregiving in a conflict zone (which I think adds complexity and relevance), I recommend expanding the background and/or discussion to include theoretical or empirical literature on the impact of protracted political conflict or war on quality of life and caregiving for children with disabilities, including CP. This would add depth and situate the findings within a broader scholarly framework.

Response: Thank you for the valuable insight. In response to your suggestion, we added a paragraph that discusses our findings related to conflict in relation to the existing literature(Page 39/from line 819-831)

Reviwer #2

1.No explicit statement that data saturation was achieved; instead, the author relies solely on the concept of “information power,” which does not fully meet the reviewer’s expectations,

Response: We appreciate your valuable feedback regarding saturation. However, as we outlined below, based on established methodological evidence and in line with similar exploratory qualitative descriptive studies that cite information power as a guiding principle, we justified our sample size using information power rather than data saturation.

• First, Braun and Clarke emphasize that saturation is a concept originating from Grounded Theory, where data collection continues until no new information emerges. This idea, introduced by Glaser and Strauss, is tied to the constant comparison method in which each new observation is compared with previous analytical insights. Because saturation is embedded in the logic of Grounded Theory, it is not conceptually aligned with other analytic approaches(Braun & Clarke, 2019).

• Accordingly, Braun and Clarke (2019) argue that saturation is unsuitable for reflexive thematic analysis and recommend information power as a more appropriate framework for determining sample adequacy. Information power shifts the focus from “Have I stopped hearing anything new?” to “Does my sample hold sufficient, relevant, and meaningful information to address the study aim?” It emphasizes richness, depth, and relevance of the data rather than redundancy of responses.

• This aligns well with exploratory qualitative descriptive approach, where the goal is not to capture every possible dimension of a phenomenon (as in theoretical saturation), but rather to provide varied and sufficiently rich accounts. Thus, data sufficiency, rather than saturation, is the more appropriate criterion.

• Information power suggests that the adequacy of a sample depends on the richness, depth, and relevance of the data in relation to the study aim rather than on reaching a point where no new themes appear. Instead of asking, “When do I stop hearing anything new?”, information power asks, “Does my sample hold enough meaningful information to answer my research question?”(Malterud et al., 2016)

• Given that the aim of exploratory qualitative descriptive research is not to capture every possible dimension of a phenomenon (as in theoretical saturation), but rather to provide varied and sufficiently rich accounts (Hunter David et al., 2019), our focus was on data sufficiency rather than saturation.

• Our study was therefore guided by the concept of information power(Malterud et al., 2016).Recent exploratory qualitative descriptive studies in health and rehabilitation sciences have adopted this approach to justify sample adequacy(Engeda et al.; Gaurav et al., 2023; Vuuren et al., 2023).

• Following this methodological guidance, we assessed our sample in relation to the study aim, the specificity of samples, the quality of the dialogue, and the richness of the narratives obtained. Data collection was concluded after 13 interviews, as the accounts were sufficient to answer the research questions.(Page 8/ line 174-178 and 185-186)

2.Limited response to concerns about “shallow interpretation”—rather than deepening the analysis, the author primarily defended the chosen methodological approach (exploratory-descriptive).

Response: We appreciate this concern. We have revised the discussion section to provide a deeper interpretation of the findings by more explicitly situating them within the broader global evidence(Page 34-42)

3.Adding a brief note stating that after a certain number of interviews no new categories emerged (which would suggest that saturation was indeed achieved),

Response: We have already described our justification above.(Page 8/ line 174-178 and 185-186)

4. Adding 2–3 additional sentences in the discussion to further elaborate on interpretation, for example by linking the findings to the broader literature to demonstrate that the analytical potential of the data was fully utilized within the chosen approach.

Response: Thank you for the insightful feedback. We have revised the discussion and more clearly connected our findings to the broader literature.

(Page 35/ line 722-727,

744-746,

764-768,

786-792,

795-797,

Page 39/from line 819-831

Page 40/ line 844-847,

851-853,

856-858,

)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers-Melkitu M.docx

pone.0346049.s005.docx (43.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Helen Howard

5 Feb 2026

Dear Dr. Melak,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 21 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols....

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Helen Howard

Staff Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript demonstrates improvement compared to the previous version. The discussion is more comprehensive and better grounded in the literature, and the authors provide clearer, more reasonable explanations of the study's methodological aspects. However, several minor issues still require further clarification, as outlined below.

1. In the statement, “In this context, caregiving could impose a double burden on women who already have demanding day-to-day roles and might also exclude them from participation in all areas of life, such as education, employment, and decision-making, which in turn affect their ability to provide optimal care for their child with CP,”

the authors are encouraged to clarify what is meant by “decision-making.” Specifically, it would be helpful to distinguish whether this refers to household decision-making, healthcare-related decisions, or broader social and community-level participation. In addition, the authors should more explicitly explain the mechanisms through which exclusion from decision-making may influence the quality of care provided to children with CP.

2. The issue of providing accurate psychoeducational information and addressing misconceptions is highly important; however, this section would benefit from clearer articulation. Specifically, the authors are encouraged to clarify how the proposed strategies (e.g., multidisciplinary rehabilitation, professional guidance, and training religious leaders) contribute to improving caregivers’ understanding and satisfaction. In addition, it would strengthen the discussion to support these recommendations with references to empirical studies demonstrating that such approaches have been effective in similar contexts.

3. A proofreading of the Discussion section is required, as it contains several language and phrasing issues. (e.g., the phrase “Contrary to study” is one example and should be revised to “Contrary to the present study” or “In contrast to the findings of this study”); punctuation should be added where necessary etc.

Reviewer #2: The authors’ responses are satisfactory and adequately address all concerns raised. The revisions substantially strengthen the manuscript, both in terms of methodological justification and the depth of interpretation. Therefore, I recommend the manuscript for publication.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy..-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Apr 13;21(4):e0346049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346049.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 3


1 Mar 2026

1. In the statement, “In this context, caregiving could impose a double burden on women who already have demanding day-to-day roles and might also exclude them from participation in all areas of life, such as education, employment, and decision-making, which in turn affect their ability to provide optimal care for their child with CP,”

the authors are encouraged to clarify what is meant by “decision-making.” Specifically, it would be helpful to distinguish whether this refers to household decision-making, healthcare-related decisions, or broader social and community-level participation. In addition, the authors should more explicitly explain the mechanisms through which exclusion from decision-making may influence the quality of care provided to children with CP.

Response: Thank you for the constructive feedback. We have clearly updated the statement as recommended. From this:

“In this context, caregiving could impose a double burden on women who already have demanding day-to-day responsibilities and might also exclude them from participation in all areas of life, such as education, employment, and decision-making, which in turn affects their ability to provide optimal care for their child with CP.”

Into this:

“In this context, caregiving could impose a double burden on women who already have demanding day-to-day responsibilities and might also exclude them from participation in education, paid employment, and political and social engagement (46, 71). Such exclusion could reduce their access to resources, autonomy in household and healthcare decision-making, and impact their well-being, ultimately affecting their ability to provide quality care for their child with CP.”

2. The issue of providing accurate psychoeducational information and addressing misconceptions is highly important; however, this section would benefit from clearer articulation. Specifically, the authors are encouraged to clarify how the proposed strategies (e.g., multidisciplinary rehabilitation, professional guidance, and training religious leaders) contribute to improving caregivers’ understanding and satisfaction. In addition, it would strengthen the discussion to support these recommendations with references to empirical studies demonstrating that such approaches have been effective in similar contexts.

Response: We have clearly articulated the statement and also provided supporting evidence.

From this: “Therefore, it is necessary to ensure access to comprehensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy to maximize the functional outcomes for children with CP and enhance caregivers' satisfaction with services. In addition, health care professionals need to provide caregivers with accurate, clear information about CP. Training religious leaders could also facilitate the dissemination of information to caregivers (94).”

Into this: “……This reflects caregivers’ misconceptions that CP is a curable condition through spiritual practices. Consistent with our study findings, research from Ethiopia has shown that family caregivers of people with chronic health conditions often engage in religious rituals and services to seek miraculous healing and emotional comfort (95). Therefore, healthcare and rehabilitation professionals need to equip caregivers with clear and accessible health information about the cause and prognosis of CP through educational training programs. In a similar context, educational workshops by health care professionals for caregivers of children with CP have improved caregivers' knowledge and health outcomes for the children and their caregivers in Zimbabwe (96, 97). In addition, research has shown that multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention improved functional motor skills and quality of life, as well as social, emotional, and cognitive outcomes for children with disabilities, and also enhanced satisfaction and helped family caregivers feel more supported and empowered in their care (96, 97). Therefore, it is necessary to ensure access to multidisciplinary rehabilitation services for children with CP. Beyond the health care professionals, training religious leaders and equipping them with accurate information about CP could help address misconceptions and guide caregivers toward appropriate services, as faith leaders are important and trusted members of the community (33, 98). The World Health Organization (WHO) also recognizes the crucial role of faith leaders in supporting the spread of reliable health information and promoting positive health behaviours, specifically in LMICs (99, 100).”

3. A proofreading of the Discussion section is required, as it contains several language and phrasing issues. (e.g., the phrase “Contrary to study” is one example and should be revised to “Contrary to the present study” or “In contrast to the findings of this study”); punctuation should be added where necessary etc.

Response: We have thoroughly read and corrected the phrasal and grammatical issues, as well as the punctuation, throughout the discussion section.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Point by point response-3rd round.docx

pone.0346049.s006.docx (26.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Taiwo Opeyemi Aremu

16 Mar 2026

“It Feels Like My Spine is About to Break”: Experience and Support Needs of Family Caregivers of Children with Cerebral Palsy in Ethiopia

PONE-D-25-19589R3

Dear Dr. Melak,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support....

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Taiwo Opeyemi Aremu, MD, MPH, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Taiwo Opeyemi Aremu

PONE-D-25-19589R3

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Melak,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Taiwo Opeyemi Aremu

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Interview guide in English.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0346049.s001.docx (19.2KB, docx)
    S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0346049.s002.docx (70.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response letter-PLOSONE-reviewers.docx

    pone.0346049.s004.docx (58.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers-Melkitu M.docx

    pone.0346049.s005.docx (43.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point by point response-3rd round.docx

    pone.0346049.s006.docx (26.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data consists of transcripts of the qualitative interviews with family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy and is majority in Amharic. Because there are only 13 participants, we are not permitted to include to make de-identified data available in order to protect the confidentiality of our participants. The manuscripts contained direct citations from the participants and is the data that we publicly share.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES