Skip to main content
Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers logoLink to Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers
. 2017 Dec 12;21(1):187–194. doi: 10.3233/CBM-170644

PD98059 impairs the cisplatin-resistance of ovarian cancer cells by suppressing ERK pathway and epithelial mesenchymal transition process

Li Hou a,1, Xiaofei Hou b,1, Lijing Wang a,1, Zenghui Li a, Beibei Xin a, Jing Chen a, Xiaofei Gao a, Haixia Mu a,*
PMCID: PMC13075749  PMID: 29103028

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The study was aimed at investigating the role of PD98059 on impairing the cisplatin-resistance of ovarian cancer cells and figuring out the potential mechanism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Treated with low dose of cisplatin (DDP), DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells were built and named as SKOV-3/DDP. The cell viabilities of ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3 and SKOV-3/DDP were detected using MTT assay. Wound healing assay and flow cytometry were performed to detect the migratory ability and cell cycle variation of the two cells and assess the sensibility to DDP in the two cell lines. However, cotreated with DDP and PD98059, cell viability, migration and cell cycle of SKOV-3/DDP were determined again. The DDP-resistance varied a lot and the potential mechanism was studied via western blot assay.

RESULTS:

Both treated with DDP, SKOV-3/DDP showed an intense resistance than SKOV-3 including stronger cell viability, larger migration area and less G1/G0 arrest, which confirmed the successfully established DDP-resistant cell line. The phosphorylation of ERK and the activation of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process contributes to the enhanced resistance. PD98059, a MEK inhibitor, suppresses the ERK pathway and the EMT process of SKOV-3/DDP. Co-treated by DDP and PD98059, cell proliferation and migratory area decreased, meantime more cell were arrested in G0/G1 phase compared to simple treatment of DDP or PD98059.

CONCLUSION:

PD98059 efficiently impairs the DDP-resistance of ovarian cancer cells via downregulating the ERK pathway and the EMT process.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer, cisplatin resistance, epithelial mesenchymal transition, ERK pathway

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer is one of the most deadly female cancer diseases, with 45.6% 5-year survival [1, 2]. The absence of specific symptoms and lack of reliable early diagnostic methods has resulted in the diagnosis of 70% of patients at an advanced stage [3]. The incipient symptoms of ovarian cancer are obscure and most patients received diagnosis until entering the advanced stage [4, 5, 6]. Surgical treatment and platinum-based chemotherapy are major therapeutic strategies for ovarian cancers [7]. Unfortunately, these therapeutic methods seem to become less effective with the progression of the cancer. Moreover, the morbidity of the ovarian cancer also remains a higher level due to lack of reliable predictive biomarker, ovarian cancer cells metastasis and the resistance to chemotherapy [8, 9].

Cisplatin (DDP), a platinum-based drug, is one of the most valid agents of solid tumors. Platinum-based drugs can cause deadly DNA damage and usually exert severe cytotoxic effect on malignant cells by inducing cell apoptosis. However, DDP resistance has been serious obstruction to the recovery of patients with ovarian cancer [10]. In response to DDP, multiple signaling pathways were activated and contributed to DDP-resistance [11].

ERK pathway is a part of the classic MAPK (mito- gen-activated protein kinase) signaling pathway, regulating cell activities [12]. Steinmetz et al. have reported that the activation of ERK pathway will induce tumor genesis and resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, such as cisplatin and doxorubicin [13, 14]. ERK pathway is increasingly activated in DDP-resistant cells, and it may promote tumor cell survival in ovarian cancer [15, 16]. Epithelial-mesenchymal-transition (EMT) plays an important role in tumor metastasis and physiological reaction to injury [17]. During EMT process, the phenotype and function of the cells will change, which mainly embody in the conversion from epithelial to mesenchymal, a loss of cellular polarization, acquisition of mobility and invasion capacity [18]. Compelling evidence suggests that repressing the EMT process could inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells [19]. The work of Haslehurst et al. strongly supported that EMT has an important effect on DDP resistance in ovarian cancer [20].

PD98059 (MEK1 Inhibitor) has been shown to act both in vitro and in vivo as a highly selective inhibitor of MEK1 activation and the MAP kinase cascade [3, 21]. Combination treatments with PD98059 and another anti-tumor reagent were widely reported to enhance the cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis [21, 22]. In our research, we combined PD98059 and DDP for promoting the inhibitory effects in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells.

Our experimental data supported that the activation of ERK pathway and EMT process evaluated the DDP resistance in ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3/DDP. As an inhibitor of MEK, PD98059 impairs the DDP resistance in SKOV-3/DDP cells, which could offer a novel therapeutic strategy for overcoming DDP resistance.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cell lines and cell culture

The ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 (derived from ascites of ovarian tumor) was bought from ATCC, and the DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3/DDP are built by our lab, applying the concentration of 4 mg/ml DDP stimulate to the ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 repetitively. RPMI 1640 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were utilized to incubate the cells. All the cells were stored in an incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37C. The cells were divided into four groups as follows: control group, DDP group (treated with 2.5 μg/mL DDP for 24 h), PD98059 group (treated with 10 μM PD98059 for 24 h), and PD98059 + DDP group (treated with 10 μM PD98059 and 2.5 μg/ml DDP for 24 h). Cisplatin and PD98059 were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

2.2. MTT assay

3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetr- azolium bromide (MTT) assay was utilized to examine cell viability. After treatment, SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells were collected in logarithmic growth phase, and different concentrations of DDP (0.00 μg/ml, 0.625 μg/ml, 1.25 μg/ml, 2.5 μg/ml, 5.0 μg/ml, 10.0 μg/ml) were added to the cells. After that, SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells were placed into a 96-well plate (1 × 104 cells per well). After incubation, cell morphology at 24 h and 48 h was observed in an inverted phase contrast microscope under 40 × magnification (Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U, Tokyo, Japan). Then 20 μl MTT reagent (5 mg/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the cells per well. After incubation for 4 h, 150 μl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to dissolve and crystallize the cells. The optical density (OD) was measured at the wavelength of 570 nm under a microplate spectrophotometer. The experiment was repeated three times. The inhibition rate (IR) of cell growth was calculated by the following formula: IR = 1 - (value in experimental groups/value in control group) × 100%.

2.3. Wound healing assay

SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells were seeded into two 6-well plates (1 × 105 cells per well). After the cell growth reached 80%–90% confluence, the single layer of the cells was scratched with a 200 μl sterilized pipette tip. The scratched cells were washed with serum-free medium three times. Then the cells were incubated for 10 h at 37C centigrade with 5% CO2. The cells in each well were photographed and recorded. The closed area of wound was measured by means of the software ImageJ.

2.4. Western blot assay

Protein concentrations were determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) and proteins with 30–100 μg/ml concentration were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF; Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) membrane was sealed using 5% skim milk at 37 degree centigrade for 1 h, after which rabbit anti-pERK (Thr202/Tyr204) polyclonal antibody (1:100, ab214362, Abcam, USA), anti-ERK monoclonal antibody (1:1000, ab54230, Abcam, USA), anti-E-cadherin monoclonal antibody (1:1000, ab15148, Abcam, USA), anti-Vimentin monoclonal antibody (1:1000, ab16700, Abcam, USA), anti-MEK antibody (1:1000, ab178876, Abcam, USA) and anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:1000, ab8226, Abcam, USA) were applied to PVDF membrane at 4 degree centigrade overnight. Then the membrane was rinsed with tris buffer saline containing 20% Tween-20 (TBST) buffer for 5 times, each time 8 min. HRP-tagged goat anti rabbit IgG (1:1000, Hangzhou Kelian Biotechnology company, China) was added and incubated at room temperature for 1–2 h and washed 5 times using TBST buffer, each time 8 min. The samples were subsequently photographed and observed under a microscope. β-actin acted as an endogenous control.

2.5. Flow cytometry (FCM) detection

FCM was employed to detect the cell cycle and apoptosis rate. We adopted Annexin V-FITC/PI dual-fluorescence apoptosis detection method to assess the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. The cells were placed into 12-well plates and cultured with 5 μl Annexin V at room temperature. After that, the cells were washed and suspended in 1 × binding buffer. We subsequently added propidium iodide (PI) into the plate. The cells were incubated for 30 min in the dark at 37 degree centigrade. The number of cells in each phase was calculated by means of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). In order to detect cell apoptosis, 5 μl Annexin V-FITC and 5 μl PI were added and cells were incubated for another 15 min. The apoptosis and cell cycle of the cells were then detected by flow cytometry.

2.6. Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The results are represented as the means ± standard deviations (SD). One-way ANOVA and two-tailed t-test were utilized to compare the difference among multiple samples and the difference between two samples, respectively. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. SKOV-3/DDP cells were more drug-resistant than SKOV-3 cells

Treated with different concentrations of DDP for 24 h, SKOV-3 and SKOV-3/DDP cells were collected. Cell viabilities were examined with MTT assay and DDP did have a dose-dependent and time-dependent response for cell growth. However, after the treatment of DDP at same concentration during same time, the growth inhibition rate in SKOV-3 group was significantly higher than that in SKOV-3/DDP group (P< 0.05, Fig. 1A and B). In the following experiments, both SKOV-3 and SKOV-3/DDP were previously cultured in 2.5 μg/mL DDP for 24 h. According to FCM detection, higher apoptosis rate was detected after DDP addition in SKOV-3 group than SKOV-3/DDP group, proving the drug resistance of SKOV-3/DDP cells (Fig. 1C and D). In Fig. 1E and F, more cells were captured in G0-G1 phase in SKOV-3 group, indicating that DDP addition successfully blocked the mitosis and proliferation while SKOV-3/DDP cells showed an intense DDP resistance (P< 0.05). Besides, the wound healing assay showed larger scratching healing area in SKOV-3/DDP cells, which indicated a greater invasion ability (Fig. 1G and H). Collective data confirmed the successfully established DDP-resistant ovarian cell line, the SKOV-3/DDP.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A–B) SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells were detected by MTT assay at different time. Growth inhibition rate of the SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells at different concentration of DDP was measured. Growth inhibition rate went up as the concentration increased. Higher inhibition rate was discovered in SKOV-3 cells compared with SKOV-3/DDP cells. Significant difference was detected between two groups, which confirmed the drug resistance of SKOV-3/DDP cells. (C–D) Proliferation was detected by flow cytometry. DDP could promote the apoptosis of SKOV-3 cells, confirming the drug resistance of SKOV-3/DDP cells. (E–F) Cell cycle was detected with flow cytometry. Cells were arrested in G0-G1 phase and G2/M phase in SKOV-3 cells, indicating that DDP blocked the proliferation of SKOV-3 cells, proving the drug resistance of SKOV-3/DDP cells (both P< 0.05). (G–H) Migration was detected by wound healing assay. Larger scratch healing area was detected in SKOV-3/DDP, revealing a worse inhibition effect in SKOV-3/DDP cells which had drug resistance. *P< 0.05, compared with SKOV-3 cells.

3.2. DDP/PD98059 impacted the ERK and EMT related proteins in ovarian cancer cells

Expression level of related proteins in ERK pathway and EMT process were detected by western blot in SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells. In the course of EMT, E-cadherin is the biomarker of epithelial cells and Vimentin is the biomarker of mesenchymal cells. MEK was the upstream protein in ERK pathway; p-ERK was the activated protein in ERK pathway. The expression of E-cadherin in SKOV-3/DDP cells was significantly lower. However, Vimentin, MEK and phosphorylation of ERK (p-ERK) in SKOV-3/DDP cells presented a considerably higher expression in comparison with SKOV-3 cells, suggesting an enhanced ERK activation and an EMT process (all P< 0.05, Fig. 2A). No significant difference was detected in ERK expression between SKOV-3 cells and SKOV-3/DDP cells (P> 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The expression level of ERK pathway- and EMT-related proteins were detected by western blot assay. (A) The expression of ERK pathway- and EMT-related proteins in SKOV-3/DDP cells and SKOV-3 cells before drug treatment. The expression of Vimentin in SKOV-3/DDP cells was higher. E-cadherin, MEK and p-ERK in SKOV-3/DDP cells presented a higher expression in comparison with SKOV-3 cells. (B) The expression level of ERK pathway- and EMT-related proteins in SKOV-3/DDP cells after drug treatment. The expression level of Vimentin increased, the expression levels MEK and pERK were decreased while the expression of E-cadherin displayed no significant difference in DDP group compared with the control group. The expression level of E-cadherin increased and the expression of Vimentin, MEK and pERK were decreased in PD98059 group. The expression level of E-cadherin was increased and the expression of Vimentin, MEK and pERK decreased in the group of combined the PD98059 and DDP. *P< 0.05, compared with SKOV-3 cells or control group.

After being treated with DDP, PD98059 or DDP + PD98059, the expression of associated proteins differed a lot in SKOV-3/DDP cells (all P< 0.05, Fig. 2B). Compared with group NC, the DDP treatment induced a stronger EMT process which was believed to result in DDP resistance. However, the protein level of MEK and p-ERK decreased in DDP group, suggesting DDP could suppressed the ERK pathway. However, using PD98059, the ERK pathway is remarkably inhibited as well as the EMT process. An increased expression level of E-cadherin, and a down-regulated Vimentin, MEK and pERK were shown in DDP + PD98059 group compared with the protein levels in DDP group. These results indicated that the PD98059 could prevent the epithelial cells transformed into mesenchymal cells. However, ERK expression had no significant difference in three groups (P> 0.05). As suggested in the figure, the combination of PD98059 and DDP usage could most effectively block ERK pathway and attenuated epithelial mesenchymal transition.

3.3. DDP promoted cell apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation and migration

Cell apoptosis rate was detected in four groups, and that in DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group was significantly higher than the group NC (all P< 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no obvious difference between DDP group and PD98059 group, which indicated that DDP and PD98059 could promote apoptosis of SKOV-3/DDP cells both separately or jointly (Fig. 3A and B). Furthermore, FCM displayed that cells arrested in G0/G1 stage in DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group were much more than that in control group (all P< 0.05) indicating that DDP and PD98059 could induce cell cycle arrest in SKOV-3/DDP cells individually or collectively (Fig. 3C and D). Wound healing assay displayed smaller scratch healing area in DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group (all P< 0.05, Fig. 3E and F). Therefore, DDP and PD98059 could separately promote cell apoptosis, suppress cell proliferation and migration, and the combination of DDP and PD98059 displayed the highest effectiveness.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A–B) Cell apoptosis was confirmed by flow cytometry. Apoptosis rate of DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group was significantly higher than that in control group. DDP + PD98059 group showed the highest apoptosis ratio. (C–D) Cell cycle was detected by flow cytometry. Cells were arrested in DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group, indicating inhibited proliferation. (E–F) Scratch healing area was detected by wound healing assay. Migration ability of DDP group, PD98059 group and DDP + PD98059 group were lower, indicating fewer migration, especially in the joint group. *P< 0.05, compared with control group.

4. Discussion

Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal malignant gynecological tumors. The 5-year survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer is less than 30% because of the lack of effective biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment [23]. Although surgical treatment and chemotherapy of ovarian cancer have improved in recent years, the prognosis of ovarian cancer remains poor. The current standard of treatment for primary ovarian cancer is the combination of optimal cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, but the platinum resistance contributes to a high rate of relapse [24, 25]. Cisplatin is commonly used for ovarian cancer treatment, but the relevant molecular and cellular mechanism for cisplatin resistance remains unclear. Hence, it is critical to figure out the additional mechanism and overcome the cisplatin resistance, which can increase the total prognosis and improve the living qualities of female patients.

In this research, we first successfully obtained DDP-resistant SKOV-3 cells and named it SKOV-3/DDP. Activated ERK pathway and EMT process were found in SKOV-3/DDP cells. ERK pathway is a part of the MAPK pathway, which is associated with cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, cell survival and apoptosis. Large amount of evidence has shown that ERK1/2 activation can influence apoptosis, cell survival and DDP resistance [26, 27, 28]. A recent study on ovarian cancer reported that DDP could induce EMT process, which can be partially inhibited by a selective MEK inhibitor, which was also reported to suppress ERK2 activation [29]. EMT process has been reported extensively to enhance the chemotherapy tolerance including DDP resistance in different kinds of cancers [20, 30, 31]. Kipps et al. and Yuan et al. also demonstrated the determinant role that EMT plays in ovarian cancer metastasis and invasion [32, 33].

To block the ERK pathway and weaken the EMT process, we combined DDP and PD98059 to treat the SKOV-3/DDP cells. Though DDP treatment has few effects on cell viability, migratory ability, cell cycle and apoptosis rate, cotreatment efficiently enhanced the inhibition and impaired the DDP resistance. PD98059 has been reported to trigger the G1 arrest and promote cell apoptosis of prostate cancer cells, leukemic cells and lung cancer cells [21, 34, 35]. Thus, it’s a novel strategy to utilize PD98059 in ovarian cancer cells to enhance the inhibitory effect of DDP, and the enhancement is efficient enough for further performing the in vivo research.

5. Conclusion

Here, in this research, we first established the DDP-resistant cells, SKOV-3/DDP. The resistance is ascribed to activated ERK phosphorylation and EMT process. Hence, we select PD98059, a MEK inhibitor, to inhibit the ERK activation during the DDP treatment. As a result, PD98059 efficiently enhanced the sensibility of DDP in SKOV-3/DDP cells. The application of the strategy in clinics could be challenging at present, thus further in vivo experiments are essential. We firmly believe it could be clinical valuable for DDP-resistant female patients.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  • [1]. Liu C. et al., Association between social support and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among Chinese patients with ovarian cancer: A multiple mediation model, PLoS One 12(5) (2017), e0177055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2]. Xia B. et al., miR-211 suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer proliferation and cell-cycle progression by targeting Cyclin D1 and CDK6, Mol Cancer 14(1) (2015), 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3]. Lan C. et al., Intraperitoneal access via direct puncture is an alternative way to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer, Gynecol Oncol 114(1) (2009), 42–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4]. Mueller J.J. et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center, Gynecol Oncol 140(3) (2016), 436–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. Li N. et al., MiR-130a and MiR-374a function as novel regulators of cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer A2780 cells, PLoS One 10(6) (2015), e0128886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6]. Colombo P.E. et al., Sensitivity and resistance to treatment in the primary management of epithelial ovarian cancer, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 89(2) (2014), 207–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7]. Kim A. et al., Therapeutic strategies in epithelial ovarian cancer, J Exp Clin Cancer Res 31(1) (2012), 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8]. Gao Y. et al., Up-regulation of CD44 in the development of metastasis, recurrence and drug resistance of ovarian cancer, Oncotarget 6(11) (2015), 9313–9326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9]. Nassir M. et al., The role of HE4 for prediction of recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer patients-results from the OVCAD study, Tumour Biol 37(3) (2016), 3009–3016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10]. Miow Q.H. et al., Epithelial-mesenchymal status renders differential responses to cisplatin in ovarian cancer, Oncogene 34(15) (2015), 1899–1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11]. Krestnikova N. et al., JNK implication in adipocyte-like cell death induced by chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin, J Toxicol Sci 40(1) (2015), 21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12]. Sun Y. et al., Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis, J Recept Signal Transduct Res 35(6) (2015), 600–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. Cagnol S. and Chambard J.C., ERK and cell death: Mechanisms of ERK-induced cell death–apoptosis, autophagy and senescence, FEBS J 277(1) (2010), 2–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Steinmetz R. et al., Mechanisms regulating the constitutive activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway in ovarian cancer and the effect of ribonucleic acid interference for ERK1/2 on cancer cell proliferation, Mol Endocrinol 18(10) (2004), 2570–2582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15]. Xu W. et al., NFATC1 promotes cell growth and tumorigenesis in ovarian cancer up-regulating c-Myc through ERK1/2/ p38 MAPK signal pathway, Tumour Biol 37(4) (2016), 4493–4500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16]. Kong L.R. et al., MEK inhibition overcomes cisplatin resistance conferred by SOS/MAPK pathway activation in squamous cell carcinoma, Mol Cancer Ther 14(7) (2015), 1750–1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. Yang L. et al., Activation of the FAK/PI3K pathway is crucial for AURKA-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in laryngeal cancer, Oncol Rep 36(2) (2016), 819–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18]. Chen T. et al., Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): A biological process in the development, stem cell differentiation, and tumorigenesis, J Cell Physiol (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19]. Li R. et al., Salinomycin repressed the epithelial-mesenchy- mal transition of epithelial ovarian cancer cells via downregulating Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, Onco Targets Ther 10 (2017), 1317–1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20]. Haslehurst A.M. et al., EMT transcription factors snail and slug directly contribute to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, BMC Cancer 12(1) (2012), 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21]. Zelivianski S. et al., ERK inhibitor PD98059 enhances docetaxel-induced apoptosis of androgen-independent human prostate cancer cells, Int J Cancer 107(3) (2003), 478–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. Yao J. et al., Combination treatment of PD98059 and DAPT in gastric cancer through induction of apoptosis and downregulation of WNT/beta-catenin, Cancer Biol Ther 14(9) (2013), 833–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. Zheng H. et al., Advances in circulating microRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic markers for ovarian cancer, Cancer Biol Med 10(3) (2013), 123–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24]. Hu M. et al., Expression of KAP1 in epithelial ovarian cancer and its correlation with drug-resistance, Int J Clin Exp Med 8(10) (2015), 17308–17320. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25]. Markman M., Current standards of care for chemotherapy of optimally cytoreduced advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, Gynecol Oncol 131(1) (2013), 241–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26]. Song H. et al., Cisplatin induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer A2780s cells by activation of ERK/p53/PUMA signals, Histol Histopathol (2017), 11889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27]. Fang J. et al., Downregulation of tNASP inhibits proliferation through regulating cell cycle-related proteins and inactive ERK/MAPK signal pathway in renal cell carcinoma cells, Tumour Biol 36(7) (2015), 5209–5214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28]. Cao A.L. et al., Ras/ERK signaling pathway is involved in curcumin-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma AGS cells, J Asian Nat Prod Res 17(1) (2015), 56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29]. Latifi A. et al., Cisplatin treatment of primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinomas generates residual cells with mesenchymal stem cell-like profile, J Cell Biochem 112(10) (2011), 2850–2864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30]. Li S. et al., Hippo pathway contributes to cisplatin resistant-induced EMT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, Cell Cycle 16(17) (2017), 1601–1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31]. Haichar F.Z. et al., Stable isotope probing of carbon flow in the plant holobiont, Curr Opin Biotechnol 41 (2016), 9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32]. Wang J. and Wu G.S., Role of autophagy in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells, J Biol Chem 289(24) (2014), 17163–17173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33]. Yuan H. et al., ALX1 induces snail expression to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and invasion of ovarian cancer cells, Cancer Res 73(5) (2013), 1581–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34]. Han Y.H. et al., The MEK inhibitor PD98059 attenuates growth inhibition and death in gallic acid-treated Calu-6 lung cancer cells by preventing glutathione depletion, Mol Med Rep 3(3) (2010), 519–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35]. Moon D.O. et al., PD98059 triggers G1 arrest and apoptosis in human leukemic U937 cells through downregulation of Akt signal pathway, Int Immunopharmacol 7(1) (2007), 36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES