Abstract
Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) is an exceptionally rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, there are no standardized treatment guidelines. This case report presents two patients with PMMC, contributing to the literature through a novel treatment approach and literature review. Both patients presented with vaginal bleeding: one postmenopausal without obvious cervical pigmentation, the other premenopausal with a brown, friable cervical mass. Histopathology confirmed PMMC in both. The first patient underwent radical surgery without adjuvant therapy and died from recurrence 36 months later. The second patient received radical surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and bevacizumab maintenance, followed by a combination of carboplatin, dacarbazine, and Tislelizumab for pulmonary metastases, achieving significant tumor regression after two cycles. A review of nine reported cases treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors revealed that radical surgery was performed in 90% of patients, yet 80% did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and most (80%) still experienced disease progression with immunotherapy, underscoring its limited efficacy. PD-L1 expression, assessed in only three cases (all negative), did not reliably predict response. In conclusion, PMMC remains a formidable clinical challenge with high recurrence rates despite surgery. Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is inconsistent, but multimodal strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, and immunotherapy may offer clinical benefit and warrant further investigation to improve outcomes in this aggressive disease.
Keywords: bevacizumab, case report, immunotherapy, PD-L1, primary cervical malignant melanoma, tislelizumab
Introduction
Malignant melanoma (MM) is a malignant tumor originating from melanocytes in the basal layer of the epithelium. While most frequently involving the skin, a small subset of melanomas arises from mucosal surfaces. Among mucosal melanomas of the female genital tract, which account for only 3–7% of all mucosal melanomas, the vulva and vagina are the most common primary sites (1). Primary malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix (PMMC) is exceedingly rare, representing merely 2–13.3% of female genital tract melanomas and approximately 9% of all cervical malignancies (2). This rarity contributes to a significant clinical challenge, characterized by the absence of early symptoms, non-specific clinical signs, and a lack of awareness among clinicians.
The aggressive biology of PMMC is notable, with a propensity for rapid local invasion and metastatic spread. Consequently, a majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to a historically poor prognosis and high mortality rate (3). Furthermore, the scarcity of cases has precluded large-scale clinical trials, resulting in a critical lack of standardized treatment protocols or evidence-based management guidelines (4). Current therapeutic strategies are largely extrapolated from experience with cutaneous melanomas, squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, or from anecdotal case reports.
This report presents two patients with PMMC, details their clinical course, management, and outcomes. The first case involved a 73-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IB1 disease who underwent radical surgery without adjuvant therapy and succumbed to recurrence after three years. The second case involved a 45-year-old woman initially staged as IIA, but whose final pathology was upstaged to IIIC1p. She underwent radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Following thirteen cycles of bevacizumab maintenance, surveillance imaging detected pulmonary metastases. She was subsequently treated with a systemic regimen of dacarbazine, carboplatin, and Tislelizumab. After two treatment cycles, a significant reduction in pulmonary nodules was observed, indicating a favorable therapeutic response. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported use of bevacizumab maintenance therapy following combination chemotherapy in a patient with PMMC. Notably, despite disease progression during maintenance therapy, the patient achieved a significant reduction in pulmonary metastases after two cycles of treatment with dacarbazine, carboplatin and Tislelizumab, providing valuable evidence supporting the potential role of immunetherapy in advanced PMMC. We aim to contribute these experiences to the limited body of literature on this rare malignancy, highlighting the diagnostic challenges, the unpredictability of its clinical course, and the evolving landscape of systemic therapy in advanced and recurrent disease.
Case description
Patient 1
A 73-year-old postmenopausal woman presented to a local hospital on April 24, 2021, with a complaint of vaginal bleeding, occurring 24 years after menopause. Her medical history included well-controlled type 2 diabetes of 20 years’ duration and hypertension of 10 years’ duration, managed with daily oral metformin hydrochloride, gliclazide, and amlodipine besylate. There was no history of hormone therapy, prior surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, or family history of malignancy.
On April 25, 2021, a ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was positive for type 33. Cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage (ECC) were performed on April 28, 2021. The pathology report, available on May 6, 2021, indicated malignant tumor involving the cervix at the 2 o’clock position, the endocervical canal, suggestive of a poorly differentiated carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed: CK(-), CK7(-), P16(+++), P40(-), HMB45(focal+), CK5/6(-), Syn(-), CgA(-), S-100(+++), Melan-A(+++), CD3(-), CD20(-), and Ki-67(+70%). These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of malignant melanoma.
The patient was subsequently referred to a provincial hospital on May 8, 2021. Physical examination upon admission did not reveal any abnormal pigmented lesions on the skin or mucous membranes. Gynecologic examination showed no pigmentation in the vagina or on the cervix. The cervix appeared atrophic and firm, with no parametrial induration. A clinical diagnosis of stage IB1 primary cervical malignant melanoma was made.
On May 12, 2021, she underwent open abdominal radical hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy. Final pathology confirmed cervical malignant melanoma with invasion into the fibromuscular layer of the cervix (depth >1/3 but <2/3). Lymphovascular space invasion was absent. The tumor did not extend upward into the uterine cavity or downward into the vaginal fornices, and all vaginal surgical margins were free of involvement. IHC of the surgical specimen demonstrated HMB45(+), Melan-A(+), S100(+), Ki-67(+70%), CK-pan(-), and EMA(-).
For economic reasons, the patient elected not to receive any adjuvant therapy postoperatively and was followed with observation alone. She died 36 months after surgery due to tumor recurrence.
Timeline:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2001~ | Diagnosis of diabetes |
| 2011~ | Diagnosis of hypertension |
| 2021-4-24 | presented to local hospital for vaginal bleeding |
| 2021-4-25 | TCT showed ASC-US |
| 2021-4-28 | underwent cervical biopsy and ECC |
| 2021-5-6 | diagnosis of malignant melanoma |
| 2021-5-8 | referred to provincial hospital |
| 2021-5-12 | radical hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy |
| 2024-6 | died due to tumor recurrence |
Patient 2
A 45-year-old woman, gravida 3 para 2, was admitted to our hospital on August 1, 2024, with a one-month history of abnormal vaginal bleeding, which had begun on June 29, 2024. Prior to referral, she visited a local hospital on July 19, 2024, where pelvic ultrasound identified a solid, echogenic cervical lesion measuring approximately 36×43×27 mm with irregular contours and ill-defined margins. ThinPrep cytology (TCT) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing at that time were unremarkable. The patient reported regular menstrual cycles and denied any history of abnormal vaginal discharge or postcoital bleeding. Her past medical, family, and psychosocial histories were non-contributory.
Physical examination upon admission was unremarkable. Gynecologic examination revealed a normal vulva. The vagina was patent, with scant bloody discharge and visible pigmentation; no odor was noted. An egg-sized, brown, friable mass with a rough surface was observed on the cervix, which bled on contact (Figure 1A). Uterine size and mobility were normal. The left adnexa was palpably thickened, soft, non-tender, and mobile; the right adnexa was normal. No parametrial thickening was detected.
Figure 1.
Colposcopy image and Postoperative gross specimen image. (A) The colposcopy image before surgery. An egg-sized, brown, friable mass with a rough surface was observed on the cervix. (B) Postoperative gross specimen. There was a blue-black mass on the cervix. Multiple blue-black plaques were also observed in the vaginal wall.
Routine laboratory investigations, including tumor markers (AFP, CEA, CA125, SCC, HE4), were within normal limits. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an occupying lesion (20×9 mm) in the cervix, highly suspicious for cervical carcinoma with possible involvement of the upper third of the vagina. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis confirmed a cervical mass (32×30 mm) suggestive of malignancy, with no evidence of distant metastasis.
A biopsy of the cervical mass was performed on August 7, 2024, and histopathological examination confirmed malignant melanoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed the following profile: CK-pan(–), PAX-8(–), S100(partial+), P40(–), P16/mothers(–), CD45 (LCA)(–), HMB45(+), Melan A(+), Ki-67(+~40%), and vimentin(+). A comprehensive dermatologic, acral, and mucosal survey revealed no additional melanocytic lesions, supporting the diagnosis of primary cervical malignant melanoma (PMMC).
On August 9, 2024, the patient underwent open abdominal radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Intraoperative exploration of the omentum, liver, spleen, and stomach showed no metastatic deposits. Gross inspection of the surgical specimen revealed an enlarged uterus with a smooth serosal surface and a 4 cm blue-black mass on the cervix. Multiple blue-black plaques were also noted along the vaginal wall (Figure 1B), leading to an additional circumferential resection of the vaginal cuff. Frozen section of the additionally resected vaginal margin showed no definitive carcinoma.
Final pathology confirmed malignant melanoma involving the cervix and endocervical canal, measuring approximately 2.0×1.6×0.8 cm. Tumor invasion depth was ≥1/3 of the cervical wall with extension into the vaginal fornix. Individual lymphovascular tumor emboli were identified, with focal tumor cells approaching the vaginal resection margin. Metastatic involvement was present in 1 of 12 right pelvic lymph nodes; all four left pelvic nodes were negative (0/4). IHC of the tumor demonstrated: CK-pan(–), S100(+), HMB45(+), Melan A(+), P53(~10% weak+), Ki-67(~30%+), BRAF V600E(+/-), CD117(partial weak+); in depigmented areas, S100 was variably positive and Melan A negative, whereas in pigmented areas, Melan A was positive. The patient was thus classified as FIGO IIIC1p.
The patient received two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) on August 21 and September 12, 2024, administered at 21-day intervals. On October 31, 2024, colposcopy revealed dark purple pigmentation with acetowhite epithelium on both labia minora, acetowhite epithelium with Lugol’s iodine non-uptake at the vaginal stump edges, and a Lugol’s non-uptake area on the right vaginal wall (Figures 2A–C). Biopsies from these sites showed stromal and mucosal melanocytes, raising suspicion for residual melanoma (Figures 2D–H); however, tissue samples were insufficient for definitive IHC. At the same day, bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 14 days) was added to her third chemotherapy cycle. The interval for carboplatin-paclitaxel was extended to 28 days, and she completed a total of four cycles. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels remained between 146 U/L and 173 U/L throughout this period. A follow-up CT scan performed on January 18, 2025 (21 days after the last chemotherapy) showed no evidence of recurrence. She subsequently began maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 21 days). No adverse events occurred.
Figure 2.
The colposcopy images after surgery and biopsy pathological images. (A) labia minora of colposcopy image; (B) vaginal stump of colposcopy image(Vinegar test) (C) vaginal stump of colposcopy image (iodine test) (D) anterior of the vagina stump (E) posterior of the vagina stump (F) left labia minora (G) right labia minora (H) right vaginal wall.
A whole-body CT scan on July 4, 2025, revealed no abnormalities. However, after completing thirteen cycles of bevacizumab maintenance, a surveillance chest CT on November 7, 2025, demonstrated multiple new pulmonary nodules in both lungs. The largest nodule, located in the outer basal segment of the left lower lobe, measured approximately 13.1×9.9 mm, consistent with pulmonary metastases (Figures 3A–C). Consequently, on November 9, 2025, systemic therapy was initiated with carboplatin (AUC 5), dacarbazine (1000 mg every 21 days), and Tislelizumab (200 mg per cycle). Following two cycles of this regimen, repeat imaging showed significant shrinkage of the pulmonary nodules (Figures 3D–F). The patient has now completed the fourth cycle of treatment with dacarbazine, carboplatin and tislelizumab.
Figure 3.
Lung CT images during recurrence and after treatment. (A) Lung CT images during recurrence (coronal plane); (B) Lung CT images during recurrence(transverse plane); (C) Lung CT images during recurrence(sagittal plane). (D) Lung CT images after treatment(coronal plane). (E) Lung CT images after treatment(transverse plane); (F) Lung CT images after treatment (sagittal plane). The white arrow indicates the lesion.
Timeline:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| June 29, 2024 | vaginal bleeding |
| July 19, 2024 | ultrasound revealed a mass approximately 36×43×27 mm within the cervix, TCT&HPV(-) |
| August 1, 2024 | Referred to our hospital, Gynecological examination revealed an egg-sized, brown, friable mass with a rough surface was observed at the cervix, with contact bleeding |
| August 7,2024 | the biopsy of the cervical mass confirmed malignant melanoma |
| August 9, 2024 | open abdominal radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy+additional circumferential portion of the vaginal wall |
| Aug 21, 2024 | carboplatin(AUC5) plus paclitaxel(175 mg/m2) chemotherapy |
| Sep 12, 2024 | carboplatin(AUC5) plus paclitaxel(175 mg/m2) chemotherapy |
| Oct 31, 2024 | Colposcopy and biopsy of labia minora, vaginal stump, right vaginal wall. |
| Oct 31-Dec 28,2024 | bevacizumab(5 mg/kg, every 14 days) +carboplatin(AUC5) plus paclitaxel(175 mg/m2)(4 cycles) |
| Jan 18, 2025 | bevacizumab(15 mg/kg, every 21 days) |
| July,2025 | whole-body CT scan detected no abnormalities |
| Nov 7,2025 | whole-body CT scan detected lung metastases |
| Nov 13,2025 | carboplatin(AUC = 5) plus dacarbazine(1000mg/21d) chemotherapy and immunotherapy with Tislelizumab |
Discussion
Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) is an exceedingly rare malignancy that predominantly affects perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with a mean age at diagnosis of approximately 56.5 years, and approximately 85% of patients are postmenopausal (3). PMMC lacks specific clinical manifestations, often leading to delayed diagnosis. Early-stage disease may be asymptomatic, while advanced cases typically present with postmenopausal bleeding, abnormal vaginal discharge, or contact bleeding. In our study, Patient 1 was a 73-year-old postmenopausal woman presenting with vaginal bleeding, without obvious cervical pigmentation, a presentation that can easily be missed. Patient 2, a 45-year-old premenopausal woman, exhibited a typical brownish, friable cervical mass with contact bleeding. Both cases underscore the importance of histopathological confirmation in diagnosing PMMC.
The diagnosis of PMMC relies on histopathological examination supported by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Diagnostic criteria include the presence of melanin in normal cervical epithelium, absence of melanoma elsewhere, junctional activity in the cervix, lentiginous intraepithelial component, absence of epithelial markers (e.g., CK) on IHC, and a pattern of metastasis consistent with cervical carcinoma (5). The most valuable IHC markers are S-100 (sensitive) and HMB-45 (specific); their combination improves diagnostic accuracy, especially in amelanotic variants (6, 7). In our patients, IHC was positive for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A, confirming the diagnosis. Notably, Patient 2 presented with multifocal pigmented lesions in the vaginal wall, highlighting the tendency of PMMC to involve the vagina multifocally. This underscores the need for thorough vaginal inspection and, if necessary, wider excision during surgery to achieve clear margins.
There is no standardized treatment protocol for PMMC. Radical hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and/or vaginectomy remains the mainstay of surgical management (8). Radiotherapy is often used for palliation or as an adjunct in cases with positive margins or lymph node involvement. Chemotherapy (e.g., dacarbazine, platinum-based regimens) has shown limited efficacy, with response rates around 15–20% (9, 10).
In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly PD-1 blockers such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. However, their efficacy in PMMC remains inconsistent and generally poor. We reviewed nine reported cases of PMMC treated with PD−1/PD−L1 inhibitors (9–17) (Table 1), which revealed several consistent patterns. Ninety percent of the patients underwent radical surgery, with only one patient not receiving surgery due to being in stage IV. Eighty percent of the patients did not receive chemotherapy, and eighty percent did not undergo radiotherapy. The majority of patients (8/10, ~80%) experienced disease progression despite immunotherapy, with survival ranging from 3 to 13 months, underscoring the generally poor efficacy of ICIs in this population. Only two patients, one reported by Anko et al (12), the other in our study, demonstrated significant tumor regression, suggesting that a small subset may derive clinical benefit. Only three patients underwent PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing, all of which showed negative expression. PD−L1 expression did not reliably predict therapeutic outcome: two patients exhibited no response, while one patient in the Anko et al. achieved a partial response, implying that additional factors, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), mismatch−repair status, or features of the tumor microenvironment, likely modulate treatment sensitivity. Our Patient 2 exemplifies the potential of multimodal strategies; after initial surgery and chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab maintenance therapy, she developed pulmonary metastases and was subsequently treated with carboplatin, dacarbazine and Tislelizumab, which led to marked shrinkage of pulmonary nodules. This experience, along with emerging evidence from cutaneous and mucosal melanoma trials, supports further investigation of combination approaches that integrate ICIs with adjuvant therapy to improve outcomes in advanced PMMC (18, 19).
Table 1.
Clinical information of PMMC patients receiving PD-1 therapy.
| Authors | age | Symptom | Figo | Surgery | LM | Chemotherapy | Chemo_regime | Radiotherapy | IHC(PD) | I_time | Survival | Status | Recurrence | Recurrence time | Recur location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 (9) | 66 | VB | IIIA | RH+BSO+PLND+TV | no | yes | Dacarbazine | no | NA | recur | 13 | dead | yes | 6 | lung |
| 2018 (11) | 40 | VD | IIA | RH+BSO+PLND+PV | yes | no | no | no | NA | post | 9.5 | dead | metastasis | ||
| 2019 (12) | 54 | Asymptomatic | IB1 | RH+BSO+PLND | no | no | no | no | Ne | post | 50 | live | yes | 17 | Douglas pouch |
| 2019 (13) | 61 | NA | IIC | RH | no | no | no | NA | recur | 9 | dead | yes | 7 | liver,lung | |
| 2020 (14) | 34 | Asymptomatic | IB1 | RH+BSO+PLND | no | no | no | no | NA | post | 13 | dead | yes | 9 | hepatic and lung |
| 2021 (15) | 74 | VB | IB1 | RH+BSO | no | no | no | no | Ne | post | 6 | dead | yes | 3 | lung, liver and pancreatic |
| 2022 (10) | 73 | VB | IIA1 | RH+BSO+PLND | yes | no | no | yes | Ne | recur | 7 | dead | yes | 4 | brain and multiple lymph node |
| 2023 (16) | 39 | VB and VD | IIB | RH+BSO+PLND | no | no | no | no | NA | post | 8 | dead | yes | 4 | pelvic |
| 2024 (17) | 69 | VB and abdominal pain | IVB | No | no | no | yes | NA | direct | 3 | dead | metastasis | |||
| This Study | 45 | VB | IIIC | RH+PLND+BSO+PV | yes | yes | carboplatin-paclitaxel+bevacizumab | no | NA | recur | 17 | live | yes | 14 | lung |
NA, not available; RH, radical surgery; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; PLND, pelvic lymphadenectomy; TV, total vaginectomy; PV, partail vaginectomy; LM, lymphatic metastasis; Ne, negative; I, immunotherapy; recur, after Recurrence; post, post surgery; direct, used directly without surgery.
A recent systematic review by Cuccia et al. highlighted that radiotherapy, in addition to surgery and immunotherapy, may represent a valuable non-invasive treatment option for female genital tract melanomas, particularly in patients who are unfit for surgery or present with locally advanced disease. Although melanoma has traditionally been considered radio-resistant, emerging evidence suggests that modern techniques, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and hadrontherapy, can deliver high doses per fraction, potentially overcoming this resistance while sparing adjacent healthy tissues. Notably, radiotherapy may also enhance tumor immunogenicity by promoting antigen release and T-cell activation, thereby exerting a synergistic effect when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The review also emphasized the feasibility and efficacy of definitive radiotherapy in vaginal melanoma, demonstrating favorable local control and acceptable toxicity, particularly when combined with immunotherapy (20). Although data on primary cervical melanoma remain limited, the biological rationale and emerging clinical evidence support further investigation into radiotherapy-containing multimodal strategies for PMMC.
This case report provides a detailed clinical account of two PMMC patients, notably illustrating the use of bevacizumab maintenance therapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy (tislelizumab) upon disease recurrence in the second patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PMMC in which bevacizumab maintenance therapy was administered following surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, and was then followed by combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy upon recurrence. The incorporation of a literature review helps situate our observations within the sparse existing evidence. However, the generalizability of our findings is constrained by the inherent limitations of case reports, including the small sample size, single-center origin, and relatively short follow-up for Patient 2. Given the rarity of PMMC, accumulating evidence through continued case reporting and collaborative case series is essential to better understand its clinical behavior and to inform future therapeutic approaches.
Conclusion
PMMC remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to its rarity, aggressive behavior, and lack of standardized treatment. Surgery is the cornerstone of management, but recurrence rates are high. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show promise only in a subset of patients, with PD-L1 expression being an imperfect predictor of response. Multimodal approaches, biomarker integration, and international collaboration are critical to improving outcomes in this devastating disease.
Patient perspective
For Patient 1, the patient and her family were fully informed of the diagnosis and poor prognosis associated with cervical malignant melanoma. They understood the rationale for radical surgery as the primary treatment modality. Postoperatively, the patient elected to forgo adjuvant therapy due to personal preference and concerns regarding potential side effects at her advanced age. Her perspective prioritized maintaining quality of life in the short term. The family expressed appreciation for the clear communication regarding her condition and the surgical care she provided.
For Patient 2, the patient actively participated in the decision-making process throughout her diagnosis and treatment. After the surgery, she was informed of the upstaging to IIICp and the finding of potential residual lesions. She understood the aggressive nature of her disease and provided consent for the combined chemotherapy and bevacizumab regimen. During follow-up, she reported satisfaction with the chosen treatment strategy, noting that she tolerated bevacizumab maintenance therapy well without significant adverse effects such as hypertension or proteinuria. She expressed hope that her clinical course, including the novel use of bevacizumab, would contribute to medical knowledge and potentially benefit future patients with this rare malignancy.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (grant numbers 2024JJ6729 and 2025JJ70023) and the Social Investment Project of Zhuzhou City in 2024 (No. 2024--63).
Footnotes
Edited by: Eva Chalas, New York University, United States
Reviewed by: Francesco Cuccia, ARNAS Ospedali Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Italy
Konstantinos Zacharis, General Hospital of Lamia, Greece
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
QL: Writing – original draft. JZ: Writing – original draft. XL: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. MH: Resources, Writing – original draft. YW: Resources, Writing – original draft. JW: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HC: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Pang Y, Yuan H, Ren A, Zhang S, Liu P. Primary Malignant melanoma of the female genital tract synchronously involving the vulva and uterine cervix: A case report. Medicine. (2019) 98:e16366. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000016366. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. DePalo DK, Elleson KM, Carr MJ, Spiess PE, Zager JS. Genitourinary melanoma: An overview for the clinician. Asian J Urol. (2022) 9:407–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.01.003. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kechagias KS, Zafeiri M, Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Kyrtsonis G, Geropoulos G, Lyons D, et al. Primary melanoma of the cervix uteri: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the reported cases. Biology. (2023) 12:398. doi: 10.3390/biology12030398. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Min A, Fu A, Huang M, Wang H, Chen H. Primary Malignant melanoma of the cervix: An integrated analysis of case reports and series. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:913964. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.913964. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Norris HJ, Taylor HB. Melanomas of the vagina. Am J Clin Pathol. (1966) 46:420–6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-196702000-00041. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yin C, Yang A, Zhang Y, Tao L, Zou H, Ren Y, et al. Primary cervical Malignant melanoma: 2 cases and a literature review. Int J Gynecological Pathology: Off J Int Soc Gynecological Pathologists. (2019) 38:196–203. doi: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000480. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Diakosavvas M, Fasoulakis ZN, Kouroupi M, Theodora M, Inagamova L, Tsatsaris G, et al. Primary Malignant melanoma of the cervix: A case report and a review of the literature. Case Rep Oncological Med. (2020) 2020:7206786. doi: 10.1155/2020/7206786. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Myriokefalitaki E, Babbel B, Smith M, Ahmed AS. Primary Malignant melanoma of uterine cervix FIGO IIa1: A case report with 40months ongoing survival and literature review. Gynecologic Oncol Case Rep. (2013) 5:52–4. doi: 10.1016/j.gynor.2013.04.004. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Noguchi T, Ota N, Mabuchi Y, Yagi S, Minami S, Okuhira H, et al. A case of Malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix with disseminated metastases throughout the vaginal wall. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 2017:5656340. doi: 10.1155/2017/5656340. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sone K, Kukita A, Masui Y, Yamada D, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Kawata A, et al. Recurrent Malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. (2022) 16:63. doi: 10.3892/mco.2022.2496. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kim MS, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Lee J, Bae DS, et al. Primary Malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix treated with pembrolizumab after radical surgery: A case report and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Sci. (2018) 61:524–8. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.524. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Anko M, Nakamura M, Kobayashi Y, Tsuji K, Nakada S, Nakamura Y, et al. Primary Malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix or vagina which were successfully treated with nivolumab. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. (2020) 46:190–5. doi: 10.1111/jog.14136. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Indini A, Di Guardo L, Cimminiello C, Lorusso D, Raspagliesi F, Del Vecchio M. Investigating the role of immunotherapy in advanced/recurrent female genital tract melanoma: A preliminary experience. J Gynecol Oncol. (2019) 30:e94. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e94. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cetinkaya K, Benzer E, Dervisoglu H. Primary mucosal Malignant melanoma of the cervix: Case report and review of the literature. Tumori. (2015) 101:e147–50. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000304. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Suzuki R, Endo H, Sasaki T, Nakamura T, Yamanaka H, Hosonuma S, et al. Primary Malignant melanoma of uterine cervix treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant immunotherapy. Int Cancer Conf J. (2021) 10:254–8. doi: 10.1007/s13691-021-00477-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lopes Macêdo M, Assunção Ribeiro da Costa RE, Amaral Dos Reis C, Da Silva Júnior RG, Oliveira Pires A, Vieira SC. Disease progression and death from cervical melanoma in a patient undergoing nivolumab therapy: A case report. Cureus. (2024) 16:e52811. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52811. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dealberti D, Bosoni D, Spissu F, Pisani C, Pizio C, Nappi L, et al. Primary Malignant melanoma of the endocervix uteri and outpatient hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool: Case report and literature overview. Diseases. (2024) 12:126. doi: 10.3390/diseases12060126. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Long GV, Menzies AM, Scolyer RA. Neoadjuvant checkpoint immunotherapy and melanoma: The time is now. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. (2023) 41:3236–48. doi: 10.1200/jco.22.02575. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Patel SP, Othus M, Chen Y, Wright GP, Yost KJ, Hyngstrom JR, et al. Neoadjuvant–adjuvant or adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:813–23. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2211437. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cuccia F, D'Alessandro S, Blasi L, Chiantera V, Ferrera G. The role of radiotherapy in the management of vaginal melanoma: A literature review with a focus on the potential synergistic role of immunotherapy. J Pers Med. (2023) 13:1142. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071142. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.



