Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2026 Mar 31;13:1805170. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1805170

Hair follicle immune privilege in autoimmune and immune-mediated alopecias: paths toward reestablishing immune tolerance

Pedram Shafiei-Jahani 1,2, Xin Li 2, Amitis Akbari 2, Emily Haniff 1, Melissa Ziprick 1, Ryan Carlisle 1,3, Carolyn Goh 1,3, Vanessa Holland 1,3,*, Omid Akbari 2,*
PMCID: PMC13076271  PMID: 41987782

Abstract

Autoimmune and immune-mediated alopecias demonstrate how a site-specific failure of immune privilege can produce reversible or irreversible hair loss. In alopecia areata (AA), cytotoxic injury is concentrated at the anagen bulb but preserves the stem cell pool, permitting regrowth following immune suppression. Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) feature a spectrum of chronic interface dermatitis that destroys the stem cell niche, leading to permanent fibrosis. These entities overlap in bulge-targeted inflammation and histopathology but diverge in clinical distribution and demographic risk. Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) of the scalp reflects immune-complex–driven complement injury to the upper follicle, whereas central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) represents a fibroblast-dominant process associated with chronic stress and is sustained by stromal remodeling. Here, we frame these entities as four follicular immune network archetypes defined by the axial locus of immune privilege collapse, effector programs, loss of tolerogenic programs, stromal trajectories, and dermoscopic correlates. Using a Network Engineering for Site-Specific Tolerance (NEST) framework, we situate these archetypes within a three-tier taxonomy comprising intrinsic follicular privilege, local tolerogenic repertoires, and stromal checkpoint circuits. Specifically, AA localizes to the anagen bulb, DLE spans the upper follicle and interfollicular epidermis, LPP/FFA targets the bulge stem cell niche, and CCCA converges on the upper follicle–interfollicular epidermis unit. Within their respective niches, AA and DLE exhibit comparatively resolved clonotypic effector modules dominated by pathogenic T cells or B cells, whereas LPP/FFA and CCCA are framed as polyclonal networks in which the failure of tolerogenic programs or stress signaling pathways constitutes the dominant archetypal engine.

Keywords: hair follicle immune privilege, immune privilege collapse, alopecia areata, lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, discoid lupus erythematosus, central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, Network Engineering for Site-Specific Tolerance (NEST)

Introduction: NEST taxonomy anchored in immune tolerance

Within the Network Engineering for Site-Specific Tolerance (NEST) framework (Figure 1), the intrinsic privilege tier lies within the follicular epithelium and adjacent stroma. The bulb corresponds to the anagen matrix and lower follicle, the bulge to the epithelial stem-cell niche at the isthmus, and the upper follicle to the infundibuloisthmic segment above the bulge (1). Immune privilege (IP) is moderate at the bulge and strongest at the bulb, primarily due to additional regulatory programs and checkpoints (1, 2). In both regions, keratinocytes downregulate MHC class I/II during homeostasis and deploy various tolerogenic networks to suppress antigen presentation and danger signaling within their respective niches (2, 3). Additional structural barriers, including a specialized vascular plexus, work in concert with local tolerogenic programs to ensure quiescence (2–4).

Figure 1.

Infographic illustrating immune privilege in hair follicle tissue, divided into three tiers: Tier 1 covers intrinsic privilege with surface expression and secretions; Tier 2 details local immune repertoires including leukocyte types and their secretions; Tier 3 outlines immune checkpoint circuits, key cellular interactions, and exemplified axes such as PD-1:PD-L1.

NEST taxonomy for hair follicle immune tolerance across three tiers. The Network Engineering for Site-Specific Tolerance (NEST) framework organizes follicular immune privilege into three distinct tiers: (1) Intrinsic epithelial and stromal privilege programs, (2) local tolerogenic immune repertoires, and (3) checkpoint circuits that restrain inflammatory escalation.

The second tier encompasses the immediate perifollicular microenvironment, particularly tissue-resident immune cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), tolerogenic dendritic cells (tDCs), and likely innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subsets (5–13). Tregs cluster around follicles and protect stem-cell compartments in genetic and spatial disruption models; their deficiency induces alopecia across multiple model systems (14, 15). tDCs play a complementary role by presenting antigens in a non-inflammatory context, secreting IL-10 and TGF-β to support Treg function. Furthermore, emerging ILC subsets can act as innate regulatory hubs in various tissue barriers outside of alopecia by supplying IL-2 and IL-10, engaging amphiregulin-dependent repair pathways, and expressing ICOSL and OX40L for contact-dependent interactions with resident Tregs (5, 6, 9, 16). Although ILCs have not been comprehensively mapped in autoimmune alopecias, their ability to sustain Treg-mediated tolerance at barrier sites warrants additional studies in this context.

The third tolerance tier is constituted by a broad set of checkpoint circuits, exemplified by PD-1, CTLA-4, VISTA, SIRPα, and CD200R (17–25). These inhibitory axes can result in immune–immune and epithelial–immune tolerogenic interactions. For instance, the CD200-positive PD-L1-positive bulge stem cells engage their respective receptors on local macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, and innate lymphoid cells (17–19, 26–28). Similarly, PSGL-1, which is broadly expressed on T cells and myeloid cells, can engage VISTA on other inflammatory myeloid cells, thereby abrogating tissue injury. Furthermore, the ubiquitously expressed CD47 ligand on keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and immune cells can engage SIRPα to suppress inflammatory antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (17). The engagement of inhibitory receptors on Tregs and innate nodes forms microdomains in which immune surveillance remains intact, but inflammatory responses are restrained (22, 29, 30). Checkpoint engagements, combined with cytokines and chemokines, license the recruitment, retention, and function of regulatory cells, thereby setting a high activation threshold for inflammatory pathways (22, 30). Genetic susceptibility, stress signals, and immunomodulatory therapies may tip the balance within this tier; therefore, additional studies in alopecia cohorts are needed to comprehensively map all regulatory pathways and create a scaffold for future immune engineering strategies (29, 30).

The three NEST tiers are defined by function rather than by mutually exclusive molecules. The first tier governs follicular antigenic visibility, intrinsic barrier integrity, and danger signaling; the second tier reflects the composition and spatial organization of the surrounding local immune repertoire, which can either preserve tolerance or permit pathogenic barrier injury; and the third tier encompasses the receptor-ligand interaction networks between epithelial, stromal, and immune cells across the first two tiers, thereby setting the thresholds for immune entry and activation within the follicular microenvironment.

Intrinsic follicular privilege across archetypes

The first axis of divergence in the NEST framework is the axial level along the bulb–bulge–upper follicle continuum where intrinsic privilege fails.

In AA, clinicopathologic observations in patients, together with mechanistic evidence from experimental models, place the dominant intrinsic dysfunction at the hair bulb, whereas systemic immune tolerance remains largely intact (31, 32). Bulbar keratinocytes downregulate PD-L1 and upregulate MHC class I/II and NKG2D ligands, such as ULBPs (Figure 2A). Moreover, α-MSH, TGF-β, IL-10, and IDO secretion can be abrogated, contributing to a diminished tolerance around the bulb and converting a low-visibility matrix into a compartment accessible to cytotoxic surveillance (30, 32, 33). The bulge stem-cell niche with additional tolerogenic programs remains relatively spared, early fibrosis is minimal, and the infiltrate forms a classic “swarm of bees” (Table 1) around the lower follicle with little isthmic interface change (31).

Figure 2.

Illustration comparing the cellular and molecular mechanisms in four types of alopecia, each labeled: A depicts Alopecia Areata with an abundance of NK and CD8 T cells and inflammatory mediators; B shows Lichen Planopilaris/Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia featuring numerous CD8 T cells, macrophages, and altered signaling; C presents Discoid Lupus Erythematosus of the Scalp with B cell and plasma cell infiltration, complement activation, and immune complex deposition; D illustrates Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia involving fibroblasts, low-grade inflammation, and various immune cells around hair follicles.

Autoimmune and immune-mediated alopecias as archetypes linked to compartment-specific failure of tolerance and downstream tissue outcomes. (A) Alopecia areata: bulb-restricted cytotoxic inflammation with relative preservation of the epithelial stem-cell reservoir, consistent with clinical reversibility. (B) Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: infundibuloisthmic- and bulge-directed interface inflammation that erodes the stem-cell niche and licenses a scarring trajectory. (C) Discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp: immune-complex- and complement-dependent injury centered on the upper follicle and adjacent dermoepidermal unit. (D) Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: stress-primed, fibroblast-dominant remodeling with chronic, low-amplitude inflammation that consolidates fibrosis.

Table 1.

Dermoscopic patterns and histopathologic correlates in immune-mediated alopecias.

Condition Sex predominance Dermoscopic features Histological features
AA Modest female predominance
F:M ~1.3:1
Follicular openings preserved. Yellow dots and short vellus hairs relatively sensitive. Black dots and exclamation/tapered hairs more specific. Early: peribulbar lymphocytic infiltrate (“swarm of bees”), catagen/telogen shift, trichomalacia, pigment casts. Chronic: miniaturization with nanogen hairs; inflammation often reduced.
LPP and FFA Strong female predominance
LPP: F:M ~4.9:1
FFA: F:M ~31:1
Both with perifollicular erythema with tubular perifollicular scale or casts, progressive loss of follicular ostia, and white scar-like patches. LPP with more prominent casts and milky red areas. FFA with isolated lonely terminal hairs within the frontotemporal band. Blue gray dots variably reported. Lichenoid/interface lymphocytic inflammation targeting infundibulum/isthmus with early sebaceous gland loss and concentric perifollicular lamellar fibrosis, progressing to fibrosed follicular tracts. FFA mirrors this LPP-spectrum pattern, with early vellus involvement.
DLE of scalp Strong female predominance
Adult F:M ~2–5:1
Pediatric F:M ~1.8:1
Follicular openings reduced or absent. Follicular red dots, follicular keratotic plugs, arborizing or tortuous vessels, large yellow dots, blue/gray peppering with interfollicular extension, white structureless areas. Honeycomb disruption in darker skin phototypes. Vacuolar interface dermatitis of epidermis and follicular epithelium with basement membrane thickening, follicular plugging, periadnexal inflammation, dermal mucin, pigment incontinence, and scarring with pilosebaceous atrophy. DIF often shows granular deposits at the dermoepidermal junction and/or follicular junction.
CCCA Possible female predominance in patients of African ancestry Follicular openings reduced or absent. Peripilar white gray halo, often 2 to 3 hairs per ostium. Irregular pinpoint white dots and white patches. Miniaturization and mixed shaft diameters. True casts absent. Premature inner root sheath desquamation with eccentric outer root sheath thinning, concentric lamellar perifollicular fibroplasia with variable lymphocytic inflammation and follicular dropout. Later retained shaft fragments with granulomatous inflammation. Polytrichia may be present.

In LPP and FFA, comparative immunopathologic profiling of human lesional scalp biopsies places the inflammatory band at the infundibuloisthmic region, showing basal vacuolar changes and apoptotic keratinocytes around the bulge (34). Bulge keratinocytes downregulate PD-L1, CD200, and HLA-E and upregulate MHC class I/II, β2-microglobulin, and alarmins such as S100A7 (34, 35). In addition to the immune privilege markers mentioned for AA, the robust tolerance network of the bulge fails with abrogated expression of K15, β1-integrin, and TGF-β2 signaling, collectively denoting a destabilized stem-cell niche (Figure 2B). Moreover, microarray analysis revealed a loss of epithelial hair-follicle stem-cell signatures together with increased expression of T-cell activation and binding markers in active LPP, supporting the inflammatory destabilization of the bulge niche (34). Taken together, since these dysregulations occur close to the epithelial stem-cell pool, immune attack, stem-cell depletion, and early fibrosis become tightly coupled.

Scalp DLE and CCCA both anchor their primary intrinsic dysfunction in the upper follicle and its interface with the interfollicular epidermis, yet they erode privilege through different mechanisms (Figures 2C,D) (36–40). In scalp DLE, human histopathology and immunopathology studies suggest that keratinocytes and endothelial cells at the dermoepidermal junction experience chronic exposure to immune complexes, complement, and type I interferons (40–42). This environment drives MHC class I upregulation, expands interferon-stimulated gene programs, sustains antigen presentation, and increases immune surveillance of the upper follicle (41–43).

In CCCA, emerging evidence, observational, and genetic association studies suggest that privilege erosion may arise from recurrent mechanical or chemical injury at the infundibulum and ostium (37, 38). Microtrauma may disrupt epithelial integrity and junctional architecture, weaken barrier function, and activate stress-repair programs in upper-follicle keratinocytes (37, 38). Early clinicopathologic and transcriptomic data further suggest reduced checkpoint tone in this niche, resulting in a lowered activation threshold for bystander lymphocytes (36, 37, 39, 44). The intrinsic tier shifts from a normally quiet, partially shielded upper follicle to a chronically stressed, checkpoint-poor environment.

Local-regulatory repertoires and effector engines

The second NEST tier comprises cellular drivers of each archetype, as well as the regulatory cell repertoires that fail to protect against autoimmunity.

In AA, patient lesional transcriptional and single-cell studies, together with mechanistic murine models, support a bulb-centered clonotypic effector program dominated by NKG2D-positive CD8 T cells (Figure 2A) (30, 45–48). These antigen-driven clonotypes often persist despite apparent clinical improvement, a finding consistent with a durable tissue-resident memory T-cell (TRM) reservoir embedded within an immunologically primed network maintained by IL-7 and IL-15 from peribulbar stromal and accessory cells (45, 46, 48, 49). In human studies, Tregs have been reported as numerically reduced around the bulb (14, 50, 51). The cytokine milieu reported has been mixed but strongly skewed toward type 1 immunity (50–52). Systemic immunity remains largely preserved, and the survival of the bulge stem cell reservoir permits regrowth once inflammatory pressure near the bulb is relieved (30, 52).

In LPP and FFA, comparative human lesional immunopathology and immunologic profiling studies suggest that Tregs are present but functionally impaired (34, 53). Paradoxically, bulk FFA tissue shows increased numbers of FOXP3-positive Treg, yet these cells fail to promote tolerance or protect bulge stem cells (Figure 2B). This suggests reduced Treg-based regulation arising from spatial mislocalization, functional exhaustion, or both (34, 53, 54). In further contrast to AA, the effector engines do not appear to be clonotypic, and IL-7 and IL-15 survival loops are less defined. Instead, current literature points to TRM persistence associated with chronic IFN-γ exposure, neuropeptides (e.g., substance P and CGRP), and stress circuits (44, 54–56). Though future studies may uncover evidence supporting a clonotypic T-cell response in some cases, the current evidence favors a model in which non-clonotypic CD8 T-cells, TRMs, chronic IFN-γ and neuropeptide circuits, and functionally incompetent Tregs enable autoimmunity.

In DLE, human lesional transcriptomic and immunohistologic studies suggest that the effector engine is centered on a B-cell–dominant module (41, 42, 57–60). Lesional scalp contains B-cell aggregates and plasma cells with clonal expansion, somatic hypermutation, and local antigen-driven maturation, potentially supporting ectopic germinal-center–like structures (Figure 2C) (59, 61, 62). Autoantibodies from these clones form immune complexes that activate complement and drive upper-follicle injury (41, 60, 63). Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), through type I-interferon secretion, further condition keratinocytes and stromal cells to upregulate MHC class I, CXCR3 ligands, and adhesion molecules. This, thereby, establishes a feed-forward chemotactic and cytotoxic milieu that promotes a chronic, self-propagating pattern of epithelial and follicular damage. Furthermore, helper and cytotoxic T cells provide cognate help, reinforcing the chronic immune-complex and type I interferon milieu that sustains autoreactivity (41, 57, 60, 64).

In CCCA, clinicopathologic and emerging transcriptomic studies suggest that lesional infiltrates are relatively sparse, consisting of polyclonal CD4 T cells that contribute to sustaining low-grade inflammation via cytokine support (Figure 2D) (39, 44, 65). B-cell aggregates and immune-complex deposition are minimal (39, 66). A characteristic regulatory or TRM signature has not been defined, and regulatory cells appear to operate in the background of fibroblast-driven remodeling (44, 65). Within this setting, polyclonal T cells and innate immune cells may contribute to a low-grade, chronic inflammatory state with a strong profibrotic component.

Checkpoint circuits

Compared with the first two tiers, mechanistic insights supporting the third NEST tier rely more heavily on broader human immunobiology and preclinical murine studies, as direct functional perturbation studies in human alopecic scalps remain of limited feasibility.

In AA, human lesional observations and immunophenotyping studies, together with mechanistic murine models, support the presence of a bulb compartment that cannot effectively suppress inflammatory APCs and clonotypic CD8 T cells (Figure 2A) (30, 32, 67, 68). PD-L1 expression is diminished in both the bulge and the bulb, potentially leaving PD-1 insufficiently engaged across these compartments, thereby lowering the threshold for immune disruption. Overt inflammation nonetheless remains concentrated at the bulb rather than the bulge, which is more effectively insulated by other checkpoints (14, 30). Concurrent production of type I interferons and IFN-γ by pDCs and NKG2D-positive CD8 T cells induces IL-15 and CXCR3 ligands, all of which stabilize cytotoxic NKG2D-positive TRMs (46, 52, 69). The lack of PD-L1 likely further results in reduced PD-1 engagement on NKG2D-positive TRMs, limiting their suppression, and on Tregs, weakening FOXP3 stability (30, 68, 70, 71).

Dysregulations of circuits within LPP and FFA are less well defined than in AA. The bulge’s privilege programming and tolerogenic architecture are more extensive and robust than those of the bulb; yet they fail to protect against a nonclonotypic response (Figure 2B). Under homeostasis, CD200-positive and PD-L1-positive bulge stem cells deliver parallel tolerogenic signals to adjacent immune cells; however, both of these checkpoint axes are downregulated in LPP and FFA (54, 72–78). In addition to checkpoint ligands directly expressed by the bulge epithelial cells, other checkpoint ligand–receptor axes within the surrounding immunity can contribute to tolerance within this region (79–84). For instance, CTLA-4 on Tregs controls antigen presentation by macrophages and dendritic cells via removing CD80 and CD86 through trans-endocytosis (73, 75, 76, 85, 86). In LPP/FFA, such checkpoints can be lost or outcompeted by inflammatory programs (54, 77, 87, 88). For instance, APCs chronically conditioned by IFN-γ can maintain high expression of stimulatory ligands, such as CD80, CD86, ICOSL, and OX40L, thereby providing polyclonal CD8 TRMs with strong co-stimulatory signals (44, 56, 88, 89). As fibrosis progresses, TGF-β1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) narrow and stiffen the perifollicular sheath, likely displacing Tregs and amplifying the loss of regulation (56, 88, 90). Recent reports also suggest that neuropeptides, such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), can contribute to this pathogenic dysregulation (55, 91). Both LPP and FFA show strong female predominance, with FFA primarily affecting postmenopausal women, together suggesting an incompletely understood role for endocrine–immune axis regulation (92, 93).

In DLE, the inflammation within the upper follicle is driven by immune complex and complement activation that can overwhelm inhibitory checkpoint pathways (94–97). The nucleic-acid–rich immune complexes activate Fcγ receptors and endosomal sensors, while the anaphylatoxins C3a/C5a amplify myeloid recruitment and interferon production (Figure 2C) (94, 96, 98–100). Activating signals saturate activating Fcγ receptors and exceed the regulatory input from inhibitory FcγRIIb, complement regulators, and checkpoints, driving APCs into a high-interferon, high-co-stimulatory state that is potentially sustained through the ICOS–ICOSL and OX40–OX40L axes (95, 97, 100). Though additional studies are needed, Tregs likely receive inadequate support, resulting in reduced IL-10 production and poor control of follicular helper T (Tfh) cell expansion (58, 101, 102).

In CCCA, emerging evidence suggests that chronic mechanical and chemical trauma may progressively shift regulatory control from follicular immune privilege toward an innate wound-healing and matrix mechanosensing program (36, 38, 103, 104). Under homeostatic conditions, CD200 on the infundibular epithelium engages CD200R on innate lymphoid cells, mast cells, or macrophages and potentially cooperates with additional inhibitory checkpoints, such as SIRPα interacting with CD47 and VISTA, which are typically expressed on these immune cells, to confine damage responses to brief, self-limited bursts of IL-1, IL-6, and TGF-β (Figure 2D) (75, 105, 106). With ongoing traction, heat, and chemical exposure, the expression of regulatory ligands can decline at the epithelial interface, potentially leaving their receptors insufficiently ligated (72, 75, 105, 107). With chronic low-grade inflammation, follicular and perifollicular fibroblasts adopt an αSMA-positive myofibroblast phenotype with increased deposition of collagen I, collagen III, and type VI collagen (COL6A1) and the induction of matrix metalloproteinases, while integrin-mediated mechanotransduction reinforces a TGF-β–dominant profibrotic state (65, 108–111).

NEST dermoscopic correlates

Dermoscopy offers a high-resolution, noninvasive window into follicular architecture and associated vascular and keratin patterns, enabling clinical diagnosis, phenotyping, and longitudinal tracking in alopecias (112–114). Within the NEST framework, dermoscopic features (Table 1) in clinicopathologic studies hint at the aforementioned networks.

In AA, dermoscopy shows preserved follicular openings and prominent yellow dots, indicating an upper follicular apparatus whose structural programs remain intact, with infundibula patent but transiently unoccupied after matrix injury imposed by IL-15–supported, clonotypic CD8 circuits (31, 32, 115, 116). Dystrophic hairs, broken hairs, black dots, and exclamation mark hairs represent the surface correlates of this bulb-directed immune response (32, 115–117). IFN-γ and stress-ligand–driven injury constricts the proximal shaft and perturbs keratinization, producing fragile fibers that taper and fracture at or just above the ostium (52, 118). The emergence of numerous short regrowing hairs signals the renewal of the bulge-centered repair axis once type-1-skewed immunity withdraws its pressure from the lower follicle (115–117).

In LPP and FFA, dermoscopy reveals perifollicular erythema and tubular scale, rendering the autoimmune interface process as a circumferential vascular rim and a keratin sleeve that envelops the upper follicle (119–123). At this level, chemokine-positioned, nonclonotypic cytotoxic T cells likely converge with a neuropeptide-responsive circuit to form a tight, collar-like infiltrate around the ostia (36, 44, 77, 124). Progressive narrowing and eventual loss of follicular openings indicate fibroconnective remodeling that overrides and likely displaces tolerogenic programs (119, 125, 126). Perifollicular white halos demarcate the expanding stroma, consistent with the uncoupling of regulatory elements from the K15+ stem-cell niche (77, 122, 126). This architectural failure in FFA additionally produces the lonely hair pattern along the frontal hairline (119, 120).

In DLE, dermoscopy shows adherent scale across follicular and interfollicular skin, visualizing an immune-complex–driven interface dermatitis sustained by B-cell aggregates and type I interferon circuits (41, 127–129). Follicular plugging is seen at the infundibulum, where basement membrane disruption and abnormal desquamation produce dense keratin obstruction as inflammatory signals outcompete the inhibitory cues (41, 127, 128, 130). Arborizing or prominent telangiectatic vessels reflect chronic endothelial activation within a proangiogenic and complement-rich microenvironment (41, 131). White structureless zones and intermittent blue-gray granularity denote the terminal repair state, where collagenous scarring and pigment incontinence permanently replace the native epithelial and adnexal architecture (119, 128, 131).

In CCCA, dermoscopy initially reveals perifollicular white halos, marking the early rise of a fibroblast-centered axis that still preserves the recognizable contours of the upper follicle, characterized by sheath thickening and perifollicular collagen deposition (119, 132–134). Progressive reduction and eventual loss of follicular openings denote inflammatory programs that override tolerogenic axes and, over time, convert epithelial canals into fibrous tracts (132, 135). Broken and miniaturized hairs reflect the influence of chronic remodeling, as recurrent mechanical stress and an impaired inner root sheath support the generation of thin, fragile hair shafts (104, 136, 137). Expanding white structureless areas may represent the merger of individual fibroblast-dominated units into confluent lesions, signaling that fibrotic remodeling has fully supplanted the native immune and epithelial programs (132, 133, 135).

Concluding remarks: the future of multi-tier therapeutics to rebuild tolerance

Within the NEST framework, durable remission requires the restoration of local tolerance, because broad immunosuppression can transiently suppress inflammation but cannot reset the local tolerogenic networks that govern long-term quiescence. The conceptual approaches outlined here are intended to illustrate how NEST can guide multi-tier regimen design rather than to define treatment protocols. In this view, immune engineering seeks to move beyond global network dampening toward tolerance restoration by repairing the dominant tolerance dysfunction in each archetype and reinforcing adjacent tiers.

In AA, the local delivery of immune privilege mediators, combined with the selective expansion of follicle-associated Tregs, for example, via topical IL-2-biased agonists or CCL22-based chemoattractants, could reinforce bulb-intrinsic and local regulatory tiers. In parallel, the rational pruning of antigen-driven clonotypic CD8 T-cell pools along the NKG2D and IL-15 axes, using IL-15 pathway antagonists or established JAK inhibitors, combined with the reinforcement of the checkpoint tier through agonism of receptors such as PD-1 or CD200R, could synergistically reestablish bulb tolerance and constrain effector persistence (48, 50, 70). In LPP and FFA, immune engineering seeks to preserve and, where possible, in adjacent follicles, reconstruct bulge-intrinsic privilege and local regulatory tiers by attenuating IFN-γ-driven and neurogenic injury circuits (138). Combinations of JAK-targeted inhibition of inflammatory T cells, agonistic stimulation of tolerogenic checkpoints on the local immune repertoire, neuromodulatory interventions, or strategies designed around restoring Treg function can recalibrate the milieu toward a more tolerogenic and antifibrotic state. In DLE, therapeutic strategies center on restoring B-cell tolerance and repairing checkpoints at the upper follicle and dermoepidermal junction. Strategies can combine clinically used lupus therapies, including B-cell depletion (e.g., rituximab, off-label) or modulation of B-cell survival pathways (e.g., belimumab), with type I interferon blockade (e.g., anifrolumab), as well as complement inhibition or selective targeting of nucleic acid-sensing pathways. In addition, efficacy can be supplemented by protolerogenic interventions, such as dendritic cell-based vaccines or checkpoint agonism, to re-impose B-cell tolerance and permit the re-emergence of immune privilege programs in residual follicles (60, 139, 140). In CCCA, immune engineering would primarily target fibroblast programming and checkpoints within the upper-follicle stromal and checkpoint tiers. Antifibrotic and proangiogenic regimens that counter TGF-β–driven fibroblast activation and normalize matrix and vascular remodeling would be coupled with strategies that restore or functionally mimic checkpoint axes on the upper-follicle epithelium. Concomitant early mitigation of mechanical stressors could reduce upstream damage-associated molecular inputs that would otherwise stabilize the fibroblast-dominant circuit (36, 141, 142).

Beyond conventional biologics, the NEST framework serves as a conceptual scaffold for advanced therapeutic platforms supported by early proof-of-concept evidence, including cell-based approaches (e.g., Treg therapy) and acellular modalities (e.g., nanoparticle-mediated tolerance induction, gene-delivery systems, and extracellular vesicle–based therapeutics) (143–147). In doing so, NEST emerges as a unifying blueprint for multimodal therapeutic design in a new therapeutic era aimed not merely at suppressing inflammation, but at durably reconstructing follicular tolerance.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This article was financially supported by National Institutes of Health Public Health Service grants R01 AI181866, R01 AI169687, R01 HL151769 (OA).

Footnotes

Edited by: Ruano Juan, University of Cordoba, Spain

Reviewed by: Arda Isik, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye

Saranyoo Ponnikorn, Thammasat University, Thailand

P. Umar Farooq Baba, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Author contributions

PS-J: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation. XL: Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CG: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VH: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. OA: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Paus R, Cotsarelis G. The biology of hair follicles. N Engl J Med. (1999) 341:491–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908123410706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meyer KC, Klatte JE, Dinh HV, Harries MJ, Reithmayer K, Meyer W, et al. Evidence that the bulge region is a site of relative immune privilege in human hair follicles. Br J Dermatol. (2008) 159:1077–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08818.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Purba TS, Peake M, Farjo B, Farjo N, Bhogal RK, Jenkins G, et al. Divergent proliferation patterns of distinct human hair follicle epithelial progenitor niches in situ and their differential responsiveness to prostaglandin D2. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:15197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15038-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ito T, Ito N, Saatoff M, Hashizume H, Fukamizu H, Nickoloff BJ, et al. Maintenance of hair follicle immune privilege is linked to the prevention of NK cell attack. J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:1196–206. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701183, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wagner M, Koyasu S. Innate lymphoid cells in skin homeostasis and malignancy. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:758522. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.758522, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shi P, Yu Y, Xie H, Yin X, Chen X, Zhao Y, et al. Recent advances in regulatory immune cells: exploring the world beyond Tregs. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1530301. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1530301, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sakano Y, Sakano K, Hurrell BP, Kazemi MH, Li X, Shen S, et al. ICOS regulates IL-10 production in group 2 innate lymphoid cells via cholesterol and cortisol biosynthesis. J Clin Invest. (2025) 135:e193134. doi: 10.1172/JCI193134, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rigas D, Lewis G, Aron JL, Wang B, Banie H, Sankaranarayanan I, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cell suppression by regulatory T cells attenuates airway hyperreactivity and requires inducible T-cell costimulator-inducible T-cell costimulator ligand interaction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:1468–1477.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.034, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laufer Britva R, Keren A, Bertolini M, Ullmann Y, Paus R, Gilhar A. Involvement of ILC1-like innate lymphocytes in human autoimmunity, lessons from alopecia areata. eLife. (2023) 12:e80768. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80768, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Howard E, Lewis G, Galle-Treger L, Hurrell BP, Helou DG, Shafiei-Jahani P, et al. IL-10 production by ILC2s requires Blimp-1 and cMaf, modulates cellular metabolism, and ameliorates airway hyperreactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 147:1281–1295.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.024, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castellanos JG, Longman RS. The balance of power: innate lymphoid cells in tissue inflammation and repair. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:2640–50. doi: 10.1172/JCI124617, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ali N, Zirak B, Rodriguez RS, Pauli ML, Truong HA, Lai K, et al. Regulatory T cells in skin facilitate epithelial stem cell differentiation. Cell. (2017) 169:1119–1129.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.002, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hurrell BP, Sakano Y, Shen S, Helou DG, Li M, Shafiei-Jahani P, et al. Iron controls the development of airway hyperreactivity by regulating ILC2 metabolism and effector function. Sci Transl Med. (2024) 16:eadk4728. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk4728, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamed FN, Åstrand A, Bertolini M, Rossi A, Maleki-Dizaji A, Messenger AG, et al. Alopecia areata patients show deficiency of FOXP3+CD39+ T regulatory cells and clonotypic restriction of Treg TCRbeta-chain, which highlights the immunopathological aspect of the disease. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0210308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210308, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cox JR, Cruickshank SM, Saunders AE. Maintenance of barrier tissue integrity by unconventional lymphocytes. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:670471. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.670471, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wan S, Xu W, Xie B, Guan C, Song X. The potential of regulatory T cell-based therapies for alopecia areata. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1111547. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111547, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sakano Y, Sakano K, Hurrell BP, Shafiei-Jahani P, Kazemi MH, Li X, et al. SIRPalpha engagement regulates ILC2 effector function and alleviates airway hyperreactivity via modulating energy metabolism. Cell Mol Immunol. (2024) 21:1158–74. doi: 10.1038/s41423-024-01208-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kazemi MH, Momeni-Varposhti Z, Li X, Hurrell BP, Sakano Y, Shen S, et al. FOXO1 pathway activation by VISTA immune checkpoint restrains pulmonary ILC2 functions. J Clin Invest. (2025) 135:e184932. doi: 10.1172/JCI184932, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hurrell BP, Helou DG, Howard E, Painter JD, Shafiei-Jahani P, Sharpe AH, et al. PD-L2 controls peripherally induced regulatory T cells by maintaining metabolic activity and Foxp3 stability. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:5118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32899-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Helou DG, Shafiei-Jahani P, Lo R, Howard E, Hurrell BP, Galle-Treger L, et al. PD-1 pathway regulates ILC2 metabolism and PD-1 agonist treatment ameliorates airway hyperreactivity. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:3998. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17813-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okazaki T, Okazaki IM. Stimulatory and inhibitory co-signals in autoimmunity. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2019) 1189:213–32. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9717-3_8, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu R, Jiang X, Dong R, Zhang Y, Gai C, Wei P. Revealing the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint proteins across diverse protein families. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1499663. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1499663, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shafiei-Jahani P, Yan S, Kazemi MH, Li X, Akbari A, Sakano K, et al. CB2 stimulation of adipose resident ILC2s orchestrates immune balance and ameliorates type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:114434. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114434, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shafiei-Jahani P, Hurrell BP, Galle-Treger L, Helou DG, Howard E, Painter J, et al. DR3 stimulation of adipose resident ILC2s ameliorates type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:4718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18601-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shafiei-Jahani P, Helou DG, Hurrell BP, Galle-Treger L, Howard E, Quach C, et al. CD52-targeted depletion by alemtuzumab ameliorates allergic airway hyperreactivity and lung inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. (2021) 14:899–911. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00388-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sakano Y, Sakano K, Hurrell BP, Helou DG, Shafiei-Jahani P, Kazemi MH, et al. Blocking CD226 regulates type 2 innate lymphoid cell effector function and alleviates airway hyperreactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2024) 153:1406–1422.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hurrell BP, Shen S, Li X, Sakano Y, Kazemi MH, Quach C, et al. Piezo1 channels restrain ILC2s and regulate the development of airway hyperreactivity. J Exp Med. (2024) 221:e20231835. doi: 10.1084/jem.20231835, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Howard E, Hurrell BP, Helou DG, Shafiei-Jahani P, Hasiakos S, Painter J, et al. Orai inhibition modulates pulmonary ILC2 metabolism and alleviates airway hyperreactivity in murine and humanized models. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:5989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41065-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar P, Bhattacharya P, Prabhakar BS. A comprehensive review on the role of co-signaling receptors and Treg homeostasis in autoimmunity and tumor immunity. J Autoimmun. (2018) 95:77–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.08.007, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bertolini M, McElwee K, Gilhar A, Bulfone-Paus S, Paus R. Hair follicle immune privilege and its collapse in alopecia areata. Exp Dermatol. (2020) 29:703–25. doi: 10.1111/exd.14155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pratt CH, King LE, Jr, Messenger AG, Christiano AM, Sundberg JP. Alopecia areata. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17011. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.11, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gilhar A, Etzioni A, Paus R. Alopecia areata. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:1515–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1103442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamaguchi HL, Yamaguchi Y, Peeva E. Pathogenesis of alopecia areata and vitiligo: commonalities and differences. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:4409. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084409, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harries M, Hardman J, Chaudhry I, Poblet E, Paus R. Profiling the human hair follicle immune system in lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: can macrophage polarization differentiate these two conditions microscopically? Br J Dermatol. (2020) 183:537–47. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18854, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Otlewska-Szpotowicz A, Baran W, Wozniak Z, Szepietowski J, Batycka-Baran A. Increased expression of psoriasin (S100A7) and interleukin 17 (IL-17) in lesional skin in lichen planopilaris. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. (2024) 41:364–71. doi: 10.5114/ada.2024.142179, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Watson VE, Faniel ML, Kamili NA, Krueger LD, Zhu C. Immune-mediated alopecias and their mechanobiological aspects. Cells Dev. (2022) 170:203793. doi: 10.1016/j.cdev.2022.203793, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Subash J, Alexander T, Beamer V, McMichael A. A proposed mechanism for central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. Exp Dermatol. (2020) 29:190–5. doi: 10.1111/exd.13664, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Malki L, Sarig O, Romano MT, Méchin MC, Peled A, Pavlovsky M, et al. Variant PADI3 in Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:833–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Flamm A, Moshiri AS, Roche F, Onyekaba G, Nguyen J, James AJ, et al. Characterization of the inflammatory features of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. J Cutan Pathol. (2020) 47:530–4. doi: 10.1111/cup.13666, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chung HJ, Goldberg LJ. Histologic features of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus of the scalp using horizontal sectioning: emphasis on follicular findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2017) 77:349–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.039, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fetter T, Braegelmann C, de Vos L, Wenzel J. Current concepts on pathogenic mechanisms and histopathology in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:915828. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.915828, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Erazo-Martinez V, Tobon GJ, Canas CA. Circulating and skin biopsy-present cytokines related to the pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. (2023) 22:103262. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103262, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harries MJ, Meyer KC, Paus R. Hair loss as a result of cutaneous autoimmunity: frontiers in the immunopathogenesis of primary cicatricial alopecia. Autoimmun Rev. (2009) 8:478–83. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.09.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rivera-Ruiz I, Ungar B, Dávila-Flores V, Gay-Mimbrera J, Gómez-Arias PJ, Juan-Cencerrado M, et al. Unravelling the transcriptomic landscape of primary lymphocytic scarring alopecias: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1651019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1651019, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xing L, Dai Z, Jabbari A, Cerise JE, Higgins CA, Gong W, et al. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nat Med. (2014) 20:1043–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3645, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Seok J, Cho SD, Lee J, Choi Y, Kim SY, Lee SM, et al. A virtual memory CD8(+) T cell-originated subset causes alopecia areata through innate-like cytotoxicity. Nat Immunol. (2023) 24:1308–17. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01547-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee EY, Dai Z, Jaiswal A, Wang EHC, Anandasabapathy N, Christiano AM. Functional interrogation of lymphocyte subsets in alopecia areata using single-cell RNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2023) 120:e2305764120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305764120, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim SY, Lee HJ, Heo J, Kim BJ, Seok J. Alopecia areata: from immunopathogenesis to emerging therapeutic approaches. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1681163. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1681163, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Passeron T, King B, Seneschal J, Steinhoff M, Jabbari A, Ohyama M, et al. Inhibition of T-cell activity in alopecia areata: recent developments and new directions. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1243556. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1243556, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhao HB, Zhang YN, Qiang Y, Wang GM, Wang LW, Jiang WC, et al. From mechanisms to therapies: current advances breakthroughs in alopecia areata immunopathology. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1621492. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1621492, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yang X, Zhang W, Zhao X, Hou W, Wu Y, Feng D, et al. Changes and significance of Th1/Th2 and Treg/Th17 cells and their cytokines in patients with alopecia areata. Exp Cell Res. (2024) 442:114259. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2024.114259, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rajabi F, Drake LA, Senna MM, Rezaei N. Alopecia areata: a review of disease pathogenesis. Br J Dermatol. (2018) 179:1033–48. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dubin C, Glickman JW, del Duca E, Chennareddy S, Han J, Dahabreh D, et al. Scalp and serum profiling of frontal fibrosing alopecia reveals scalp immune and fibrosis dysregulation with no systemic involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2022) 86:551–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.05.016, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Del Duca E, Ruano Ruiz J, Pavel AB, Sanyal RD, Song T, Gay-Mimbrera J, et al. Frontal fibrosing alopecia shows robust T helper 1 and Janus kinase 3 skewing. Br J Dermatol. (2020) 183:1083–93. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19040, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Doche I, Wilcox GL, Ericson M, Valente NS, Romiti R, McAdams BD, et al. Evidence for neurogenic inflammation in lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia pathogenic mechanism. Exp Dermatol. (2020) 29:282–5. doi: 10.1111/exd.13835, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen Q, Li Y, Zhu Q, Li Z, Shao G, Liu Y, et al. Single-cell sequencing combined with spatial transcriptomics reveals the characteristics of follicle-targeted inflammation patterns in primary cicatricial alopecia. Cell Biosci. (2025) 15:102. doi: 10.1186/s13578-025-01447-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wenzel J, Uerlich M, Worrenkamper E, Freutel S, Bieber T, Tuting T. Scarring skin lesions of discoid lupus erythematosus are characterized by high numbers of skin-homing cytotoxic lymphocytes associated with strong expression of the type I interferon-induced protein MxA. Br J Dermatol. (2005) 153:1011–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06784.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mendez-Flores S, Hernández-Molina G, Enríquez AB, Faz-Muñoz D, Esquivel Y, Pacheco-Molina C, et al. Cytokines and effector/regulatory cells characterization in the physiopathology of cutaneous lupus erythematous: a cross-sectional study. Mediat Inflamm. (2016) 2016:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2016/7074829, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lerman I, Bawany F, Whitt W, Esaa F, Yon J, Babkowski N, et al. Prominent B-cell signature differentiates discoid from subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol. (2022) 142:2885–2895.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.03.033, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hoi A, Igel T, Mok CC, Arnaud L. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. (2024) 403:2326–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00398-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fetter T, Niebel D, Braegelmann C, Wenzel J. Skin-associated B cells in the pathogenesis of cutaneous autoimmune diseases-implications for therapeutic approaches. Cells. (2020) 9:2627. doi: 10.3390/cells9122627, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Vos L, Guel T, Niebel D, Bald S, ter Steege A, Bieber T, et al. Characterization of B cells in lupus erythematosus skin biopsies in the context of different immune cell infiltration patterns. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:1037408. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1037408, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Quelhas da Costa R, Aguirre-Alastuey ME, Isenberg DA, Saracino AM. Assessment of response to B-cell depletion using rituximab in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. JAMA Dermatol. (2018) 154:1432–40. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3793, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhou X, Yan J, Lu Q, Zhou H, Fan L. The pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: the aberrant distribution and function of different cell types in skin lesions. Scand J Immunol. (2021) 93:e12933. doi: 10.1111/sji.12933, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bao A, Qadri A, Gadre A, Will E, Collins D, Ahima R, et al. Low-dose metformin and profibrotic signature in central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. JAMA Dermatol. (2024) 160:1211–9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3062, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jordan CS, Chapman C, Kolivras A, Roberts JL, Thompson NB, Thompson CT. Clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic characterization of lichen planopilaris and central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: a comparative study of 51 cases. J Cutan Pathol. (2020) 47:128–34. doi: 10.1111/cup.13592, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Toomer KH, Lui JB, Altman NH, Ban Y, Chen X, Malek TR. Essential and non-overlapping IL-2Ralpha-dependent processes for thymic development and peripheral homeostasis of regulatory T cells. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:1037. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08960-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fan MY, Turka LA. Immunometabolism and PI(3)K Signaling as a link between IL-2, Foxp3 expression, and suppressor function in regulatory T cells. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:69. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00069, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gary-Gouy H, Lebon P, Dalloul AH. Type I interferon production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and monocytes is triggered by viruses, but the level of production is controlled by distinct cytokines. J Interf Cytokine Res. (2002) 22:653–9. doi: 10.1089/10799900260100132, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lai HJ, Ye ZM, Chen SQ, McElwee KJ, Guo HW. Immune therapies for alopecia areata: evidence and new perspectives. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2025) 21:1421–46. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2025.2575365, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chu KH, Chiang BL. CD200R activation on naive T cells by B cells induces suppressive activity of T cells via IL-24. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2024) 81:231. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05268-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Harries MJ, Paus R. The pathogenesis of primary cicatricial alopecias. Am J Pathol. (2010) 177:2152–62. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100454, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tekguc M, Wing JB, Osaki M, Long J, Sakaguchi S. Treg-expressed CTLA-4 depletes CD80/CD86 by trogocytosis, releasing free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2021) 118:e2023739118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023739118, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mobini N, Tam S, Kamino H. Possible role of the bulge region in the pathogenesis of inflammatory scarring alopecia: lichen planopilaris as the prototype. J Cutan Pathol. (2005) 32:675–9. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2005.00399.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kotwica-Mojzych K, Jodlowska-Jedrych B, Mojzych M. CD200:CD200R interactions and their importance in immunoregulation. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:1602. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041602, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kennedy A, Waters E, Rowshanravan B, Hinze C, Williams C, Janman D, et al. Differences in CD80 and CD86 transendocytosis reveal CD86 as a key target for CTLA-4 immune regulation. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:1365–78. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01289-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Harries MJ, Jimenez F, Izeta A, Hardman J, Panicker SP, Poblet E, et al. Lichen Planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia as model epithelial stem cell diseases. Trends Mol Med. (2018) 24:435–48. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.03.007, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Habashi-Daniel A, Roberts JL, Desai N, Thompson CT. Absence of catagen/telogen phase and loss of cytokeratin 15 expression in hair follicles in lichen planopilaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2014) 71:969–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.055, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rawat K, Tewari A, Li X, Mara AB, King WT, Gibbings SL, et al. CCL5-producing migratory dendritic cells guide CCR5+ monocytes into the draining lymph nodes. J Exp Med. (2023) 220:e20222129. doi: 10.1084/jem.20222129, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li X, Rawat K, Jakubzick CV. Targeting resident macrophages in cancer. Nat Immunol. (2021) 22:1078–9. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01002-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li X, Kolling FW, Aridgides D, Mellinger D, Ashare A, Jakubzick CV. ScRNA-seq expression of IFI27 and APOC2 identifies four alveolar macrophage superclusters in healthy BALF. Life Sci Alliance. (2022) 5:e202201458. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201458, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li X, Jakubzick CV. Macrophages show up in style when Th2 lymphocytes organize their homecoming. Immunity. (2023) 56:900–2. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.04.007, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Helou DG, Quach C, Hurrell BP, Li X, Li M, Akbari A, et al. LAIR-1 limits macrophage activation in acute inflammatory lung injury. Mucosal Immunol. (2023) 16:788–800. doi: 10.1016/j.mucimm.2023.08.003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.The hidden functional diversity of macrophages . Nat Immunol. (2024) 25:953–4. doi: 10.1038/s41590-024-01832-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mazerolles F, Rieux-Laucat F. PD-L1 is expressed on human activated naive effector CD4+ T cells. Regulation by dendritic cells and regulatory CD4+ T cells. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0260206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260206, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gutic B, Bozanovic T, Mandic A, Dugalic S, Todorovic J, Stanisavljevic D, et al. Programmed cell death-1 and its ligands: current knowledge and possibilities in immunotherapy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). (2023) 78:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100177, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Anzai A, Abujamra BA, Aoki V, Jozic I. Upregulation of caveolae-associated structural proteins in the hair follicle bulge of lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia. Arch Dermatol Res. (2024) 316:330. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03153-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Harries MJ, Meyer K, Chaudhry I, E Kloepper J, Poblet E, Griffiths CEM, et al. Lichen planopilaris is characterized by immune privilege collapse of the hair follicle's epithelial stem cell niche. J Pathol. (2013) 231:236–47. doi: 10.1002/path.4233, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ma SA, Imadojemu S, Beer K, Seykora JT. Inflammatory features of frontal fibrosing alopecia. J Cutan Pathol. (2017) 44:672–6. doi: 10.1111/cup.12955, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hobo A, Harada K, Maeda T, Uchiyama M, Irisawa R, Yamazaki M, et al. IL-17-positive mast cell infiltration in the lesional skin of lichen planopilaris: possible role of mast cells in inducing inflammation and dermal fibrosis in cicatricial alopecia. Exp Dermatol. (2020) 29:273–7. doi: 10.1111/exd.13816, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mashaghi A, Marmalidou A, Tehrani M, Grace PM, Pothoulakis C, Dana R. Neuropeptide substance P and the immune response. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:4249–64. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2293-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Meinhard J, Stroux A, Lunnemann L, Vogt A, Blume-Peytavi U. Lichen planopilaris: epidemiology and prevalence of subtypes - a retrospective analysis in 104 patients. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. (2014) 12, 229-235:229–36. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12264, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kanti V, Constantinou A, Reygagne P, Vogt A, Kottner J, Blume-Peytavi U. Frontal fibrosing alopecia: demographic and clinical characteristics of 490 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2019) 33:1976–83. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15735, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhuang H, Han S, Li Y, Kienhöfer D, Lee P, Shumyak S, et al. A novel mechanism for generating the interferon signature in lupus: opsonization of dead cells by complement and IgM. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2016) 68:2917–28. doi: 10.1002/art.39781, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.van der Vlist M, Ramos MIP, van den Hoogen LL, Hiddingh S, Timmerman LM, de Hond TAP, et al. Signaling by the inhibitory receptor CD200R is rewired by type I interferon. Sci Signal. (2021) 14:eabb4324. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abb4324, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Scholtissek B, Zahn S, Maier J, Klaeschen S, Braegelmann C, Hoelzel M, et al. Immunostimulatory endogenous nucleic acids drive the lesional inflammation in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol. (2017) 137:1484–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.03.018, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lu KL, Wu MY, Wang CH, Wang CW, Hung SI, Chung WH, et al. The role of immune checkpoint receptors in regulating immune reactivity in lupus. Cells. (2019) 8:1213. doi: 10.3390/cells8101213, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Guiducci C, Tripodo C, Gong M, Sangaletti S, Colombo MP, Coffman RL, et al. Autoimmune skin inflammation is dependent on plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation by nucleic acids via TLR7 and TLR9. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:2931–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101048, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Elkon KB, Santer DM. Complement, interferon and lupus. Curr Opin Immunol. (2012) 24:665–70. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Boruchov AM, Heller G, Veri MC, Bonvini E, Ravetch JV, Young JW. Activating and inhibitory IgG fc receptors on human DCs mediate opposing functions. J Clin Invest. (2005) 115:2914–23. doi: 10.1172/JCI24772, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Nagasaki J, Togashi Y. A variety of 'exhausted' T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Int Immunol. (2022) 34:563–70. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxac013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Perry JA, Shallberg L, Clark JT, Gullicksrud JA, DeLong JH, Douglas BB, et al. PD-L1-PD-1 interactions limit effector regulatory T cell populations at homeostasis and during infection. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:743–56. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01170-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Vogt A, Constantinou A, Rancan F, Ghoreschi K, Blume-Peytavi U, Combadiere B. A niche in the spotlight: could external factors critically disturb hair follicle homeostasis and contribute to inflammatory hair follicle diseases? Exp Dermatol. (2020) 29:1080–7. doi: 10.1111/exd.14212, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Dlova NC, Salkey KS, Callender VD, McMichael AJ. Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: new insights and a call for action. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. (2017) 18:S54–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jisp.2017.01.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rutsche D, Michalak-Micka K, Zielinska D, Moll H, Moehrlen U, Biedermann T, et al. The role of CD200-CD200 receptor in human blood and lymphatic endothelial cells in the regulation of skin tissue inflammation. Cells. (2022) 11:1055. doi: 10.3390/cells11061055, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hayakawa K, Wang X, Lo EH. CD200 increases alternatively activated macrophages through cAMP-response element binding protein - C/EBP-beta signaling. J Neurochem. (2016) 136:900–6. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13492, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Anzai A, Wang EHC, Lee EY, Aoki V, Christiano AM. Pathomechanisms of immune-mediated alopecia. Int Immunol. (2019) 31:439–47. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxz039, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Thannickal VJ, Lee DY, White ES, Cui Z, Larios JM, Chacon R, et al. Myofibroblast differentiation by transforming growth factor-beta1 is dependent on cell adhesion and integrin signaling via focal adhesion kinase. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:12384–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208544200, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cho N, Razipour SE, McCain ML. Featured article: TGF-beta1 dominates extracellular matrix rigidity for inducing differentiation of human cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). (2018) 243:601–12. doi: 10.1177/1535370218761628, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Aguh C, Dina Y, Talbot CC, Jr, Garza L. Fibroproliferative genes are preferentially expressed in central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2018) 79:904–912.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.05.1257, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shafiei-Jahani P, Helou DG, Hurrell BP, Howard E, Quach C, Painter JD, et al. CD200-CD200R immune checkpoint engagement regulates ILC2 effector function and ameliorates lung inflammation in asthma. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:2526. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22832-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pirmez R. The dermatoscope in the hair clinic: Trichoscopy of scarring and nonscarring alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2023) 89:S9–S15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.033, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Miteva M, Tosti A. Hair and scalp dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2012) 67:1040–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Karadag Kose O, Gulec AT. Clinical evaluation of alopecias using a handheld dermatoscope. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2012) 67:206–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.08.019, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Waskiel A, Rakowska A, Sikora M, Olszewska M, Rudnicka L. Trichoscopy of alopecia areata: An update. J Dermatol. (2018) 45:692–700. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14283, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Al-Dhubaibi MS, Alsenaid A, Alhetheli G, Abd Elneam AI. Trichoscopy pattern in alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skin Res Technol. (2023) 29:e13378. doi: 10.1111/srt.13378, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Inui S, Nakajima T, Nakagawa K, Itami S. Clinical significance of dermoscopy in alopecia areata: analysis of 300 cases. Int J Dermatol. (2008) 47:688–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03692.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Agamia N, Apalla Z, el Achy S, Abdelmaksoud E, Kandil N, Abozeid S. Interferon-gamma serum level and immunohistochemical expression of CD8 cells in tissue biopsies in patients with alopecia areata in correlation with trichoscopic findings. Dermatol Ther. (2020) 33:e13718. doi: 10.1111/dth.13718, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wyche J, Senna M, Aguh C. Approach to Scarring Alopecia. JAMA Dermatol. (2025) 161:1281–2. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Starace MVR, Pampaloni F, Iorizzo M, Apalla Z, Asfour L, Freites-Martinez A, et al. Delphi consensus on the distinct clinical and histopathological features of lichen Planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: insights from the hair diseases EADV task force. Int J Dermatol. (2025) 64:1246–54. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17780, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Miteva M, Tosti A. Dermoscopy guided scalp biopsy in cicatricial alopecia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2013) 27:1299–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04530.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kolcz K, Krawczyk-Woloszyn K, Reich A, Zychowska M. Pruritus in lichen Planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia-clinical characteristics and Dermoscopic correlations. J Clin Med. (2024) 13:4898. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164898, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Inui S, Nakajima T, Shono F, Itami S. Dermoscopic findings in frontal fibrosing alopecia: report of four cases. Int J Dermatol. (2008) 47:796–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03681.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Miao YJ, Jing J, du XF, Mao MQ, Yang XS, Lv ZF. Frontal fibrosing alopecia: a review of disease pathogenesis. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:911944. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.911944, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Jerjen R, Pinczewski J, Sinclair R, Bhoyrul B. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution: a retrospective cohort study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2021) 35:2440–7. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17604, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.de Almeida Verdolin A, el Kadi N, Raggio Luiz R, N Ekelem C, Pantaleão L, Reis Gavazzoni Dias MF. New histopathologic findings in scarring Alopecias: the role of adipose tissue and eccrine sweat coils in frontal fibrosing alopecia, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, and lichen Planopilaris. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2024) 148:1041–5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0339-OA, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zychowska M, Zychowska M. Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus - a systematic review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. (2021) 60:818–28. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15365, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zychowska M, Reich A. Dermoscopic features of acute, subacute, chronic and intermittent subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus in Caucasians. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:4088. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144088, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Lallas A, Apalla Z, Lefaki I, Sotiriou E, Lazaridou E, Ioannides D, et al. Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. (2013) 168:284–8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Apalla Z, Papadimitriou I, Iordanidis D, Errichetti E, Kyrgidis A, Rakowska A, et al. The dermatoscopic spectrum of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a retrospective analysis by clinical subtype with clinicopathological correlation. Dermatol Ther. (2020) 33:e14514. doi: 10.1111/dth.14514, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Salah E. Clinical and dermoscopic spectrum of discoid lupus erythematosus: novel observations from lips and oral mucosa. Int J Dermatol. (2018) 57:830–6. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14015, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Younesi FS, Miller AE, Barker TH, Rossi FMV, Hinz B. Fibroblast and myofibroblast activation in normal tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2024) 25:617–38. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00716-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Moretti L, Stalfort J, Barker TH, Abebayehu D. The interplay of fibroblasts, the extracellular matrix, and inflammation in scar formation. J Biol Chem. (2022) 298:101530. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101530, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Miteva M, Tosti A. Dermatoscopic features of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2014) 71:443–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.069, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sawant M, Hinz B, Schönborn K, Zeinert I, Eckes B, Krieg T, et al. A story of fibers and stress: matrix-embedded signals for fibroblast activation in the skin. Wound Repair Regen. (2021) 29:515–30. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12950, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Xie Y, Chen D, Jiang K, Song L, Qian N, du Y, et al. Hair shaft miniaturization causes stem cell depletion through mechanosensory signals mediated by a Piezo1-calcium-TNF-alpha axis. Cell Stem Cell. (2022) 29:70–85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.09.009, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Shin W, Rosin NL, Sparks H, Sinha S, Rahmani W, Sharma N, et al. Dysfunction of hair follicle mesenchymal progenitors contributes to age-associated hair loss. Dev Cell. (2020) 53:185–198.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.03.019, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Stege H, Haist M, Schultheis M, Pawlowski J, Wittmann M, Grabbe S, et al. Treatment of lichen Planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: a retrospective, real-life analysis in a tertiary Center in Germany. J Clin Med. (2024) 13:4947. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164947, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Sprow G, Dan J, Merola JF, Werth VP. Emerging therapies in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Front Med (Lausanne). (2022) 9:968323. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.968323, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Ritprajak P, Kaewraemruaen C, Hirankarn N. Current paradigms of tolerogenic dendritic cells and clinical implications for systemic lupus erythematosus. Cells. (2019) 8:1291. doi: 10.3390/cells8101291, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Tschumperlin DJ, Ligresti G, Hilscher MB, Shah VH. Mechanosensing and fibrosis. J Clin Invest. (2018) 128:74–84. doi: 10.1172/JCI93561, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Halley-Stott RP, Adeola HA, Khumalo NP. Destruction of the stem cell niche, pathogenesis and promising treatment targets for primary scarring Alopecias. Stem Cell Rev Rep. (2020) 16:1105–20. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-09985-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yang Y, Santamaria P. Antigen-specific nanomedicines for the treatment of autoimmune disease: target cell types, mechanisms and outcomes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. (2022) 74:285–92. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.12.012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Li Y, Wang G, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Cui L, Huang X. Exosomes secreted from adipose-derived stem cells are a potential treatment agent for immune-mediated alopecia. J Immunol Res. (2022) 2022:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2022/7471246, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Keren A, Goldstein N, Bertolini M, Kassem R, Strbo N, Paus R, et al. Toward cell-based therapy of alopecia areata: autologous human Vdelta2(+) Foxp3(+) gammadeltaTreg cells restore hair-follicle immune privilege and promote hair regrowth in human alopecia areata models ex vivo and in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. (2026) 146. (online ahead of print). doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2025.12.033, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.da Costa Pereira Cestari M, Falavigna Tovo R, Franco Bueno D. MSC-derived Secretome and exosomes in dermatology: mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities, and scientific challenges-a narrative review. Int J Dermatol. (2026) 65:257–72. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17982, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.An N, Yasen G, Li X, Shi X, Wang Y, Liu H. Nanoparticle adjuvants incorporating haptens drive potent immune tolerance to accelerate hair regrowth. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. (2025) 17:6679–88. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c17068, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES