Abstract
Context
The study presents a comprehensive computational analysis of CO adsorption on anatase TiO2 surfaces with the (001) and (111) facets, utilizing CO as an IR probe. CO adsorption orientations and binding strengths vary between surfaces due to differences in local surface geometries and Ti coordination environments. Detailed electronic structure analyses, including density of states and wavefunction visualizations, show that σ-donation dominates on the (111) [TiO3] site. At the same time, π-backdonation is more prominent at the (111) [TiO5] site, correlating with a blue shift of the CO stretching frequency for the (111) [TiO3] site and a red shift for the (111) [TiO5] site. Surface oxygen atoms are key contributors to π-backdonation. The results highlight the critical role of surface topography and coordination environment in governing CO adsorption behavior, extending previous insights into anatase surface chemistry.
Methods
All periodic calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio package (VASP), employing the GGA-PBE functional and a plane-wave basis set, with the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method for the description of core electrons. All cluster calculations were performed using the ORCA package. We employed the PBE and B3LYP functionals, as well as the MP2 wavefunction–based method, all with the TZVP basis set. For the localized average ionization energy (ALIE), we employed the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV5Z level of theory.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00894-026-06703-w.
Keywords: DFT, Molecule-surface interactions, TiO2 anatase, CO IR probe, Surface topology, Density functional calculations, Surface chemistry
Introduction
Since the discovery of the activity of TiO2 in the light-induced decomposition of water into H2 and O2 and CO2 reduction, research on TiO2 has grown considerably [1–15]. Its popularity stems from its chemical stability, non-toxicity, natural abundance, ease of synthesis, and low cost. However, despite these advantages, TiO2 still lacks specific critical properties, such as an optimal band gap and effective charge separation, which limits its performance [16]. To overcome these challenges, current research is focused on enhancing the efficiency of TiO2 through various modifications, including doping, functionalization, and defect engineering [17–19]. Among the TiO2 crystalline phases, anatase and rutile have been the most extensively studied (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
The bulk structure of the two photoactive phases of TiO2, anatase (a–c) and rutile (d–f), as viewed along three crystallographic directions (red oxygen atoms, blue titanium atoms). The data were obtained from X-ray scattering experiments [28, 29]. The primitive unit cells are indicated. In anatase, the primitive cell is triclinic (due to its minimal volume representation), while rutile’s primitive cell is tetragonal. However, the overall crystal symmetry of both phases is tetragonal
Anatase features a variety of crystallographic surfaces, each characterized by unique Miller indices. The (101) surface is the most thermodynamically stable and is primarily observed. However, advancements in crystal engineering have made it possible to produce anatase crystals with higher-energy surfaces. Reference [20] was the first to present the synthesis of TiO2 anatase nanocrystals with the (111) facet exposed and provided evidence of this via high-resolution TEM microscopy. Several experimental papers have been published providing additional information on the existence of the (111) surface [21–23]. The surface energy of these surfaces follows the order (111) > (001) > (101) [20]. Nanocrystals of TiO2 anatase with exposed (001) and (111) facets have been shown to be highly reactive [24]. Furthermore, the (111) facet shows higher photoactive selectivity than the (001) surface [25]. Despite significant progress, the exact mechanism underlying water splitting and the activity among different surfaces remains not fully understood [26, 27].
Existing research has shown that facet engineering, which encompasses various TiO2 facets, can enhance photocatalytic activity. In this regard, the photocatalytic activity of the anatase (111) surface remains underexplored compared to the widely studied (101) and (001) facets. However, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the photocatalytic mechanism and improve its efficiency, it is crucial to investigate the surface structure of the catalyst thoroughly. One effective approach involves using probe molecules, whose experimentally measurable properties can vary significantly, reflecting differences in interaction with surface sites. Among these, carbon monoxide (CO) is a commonly utilized probe molecule, well known for its sensitivity to the local chemical environment through shifts in its vibrational stretching frequency (νCO), which are highly responsive to changes in the chemical context and occur in a spectral region well separated from the framework vibrations (the experimental value of the fundamental vibrational stretching frequency is 2143 cm−1 [30]), making them easily distinguishable and readily detected using infrared (IR) spectroscopy [31–34].
The sensitivity of νCO arises from the unique electronic structure of the CO molecule, which enables it to act as both an electron acceptor (Lewis acid) and donor (Lewis base). Upon adsorption onto a surface, CO interacts with the surface through (i) electrostatic interactions, (ii) the donation of electron density from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), specifically the antibonding σ-orbital, to the surface, and (iii) π-backdonation, involving the transfer of electron density from the metal center into the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), the antibonding π-orbital [17]. These interactions coexist, and the resulting shift in νCO frequency reflects a delicate balance between them. For TiO2 surfaces, studies have shown that electrostatic interactions and σ-donation (mechanisms (i) and (ii)) predominantly govern CO adsorption at fivefold-coordinated titanium [Ti(5)] sites on both (110) rutile and (101) anatase surfaces [27, 35–37]. This dominance is evidenced by increased νCO values, which correlate with the degree of Ti-site unsaturation. A lower correlation facilitates greater electron withdrawal, as this site becomes more reactive. The withdrawal of electron density from the antibonding HOMO of CO strengthens the bond, resulting in a blue shift of νCO. Consequently, one might observe even larger νCO shifts at fourfold-coordinated sites [Ti(4)]. Indeed, multiple previous studies suggest that this assumption is valid [34, 37–44]. However, in reference [31] it is reported that CO adsorption on [TiO4] sites of anatase (110) surfaces exhibited lower νCO values compared to [TiO5] sites on anatase (101) surfaces. This counterintuitive observation was attributed to backdonation from adjacent surface oxygen atoms, which donate electron density into the LUMO (2π* orbital), weakening the CO bond and causing a red shift in νCO. Therefore, the donation/backdonation should be regarded as a property of the surface as a whole, rather than the character of the individual local site.
Numerous computational studies on the surface of anatase’s behavior have been published, utilizing periodic calculation methods. These studies have examined the adsorption of water [45, 46], formaldehyde [47], formic acid [48], ethanol [49], and the CO molecule [31, 37, 50, 51] on both the (101) and (001) surfaces. Noticeably, reference [37] presents a multi-technique study on the adsorption of CO molecules on the anatase (101) surface, demonstrating good agreement between experimental IR spectroscopy and periodic DFT calculations, as well as reasonable agreement between temperature-programmed desorption data and DFT results. The close match between the theoretically predicted and experimentally observed CO stretching frequencies (νCO) confirms the reliability of periodic DFT calculations. Reference [52] reports a correlation between the binding energy of a CO molecule and the blue shift of its stretching vibration frequency on anatase (101) and (001) surfaces. In this work, we present the results of cluster and periodic calculations aimed at characterizing the (111) surface of anatase, a facet that has not been extensively studied to date. For comparison, we also examine the well-characterized (001) surface of anatase. To this end, we model key properties, focusing particularly on the vibrational frequencies of a CO probe molecule adsorbed at various sites on the anatase surfaces. Our research on the high-energy (111) anatase surface reveals significant deviations from its ideal geometry after optimization, suggesting that the actual structure of high-energy anatase surfaces may differ from conventional idealized models. We also demonstrate how the structure, particularly the coordination of Ti atoms, is reflected in the stretching frequencies of CO molecules, which are often used as probes for analyzing the local surface structures.
Methods
Two TiO2 anatase surfaces, (001) and (111) (Fig. 2), taken from an experimentally obtained bulk anatase structure [29], were optimized using the periodic slab models, which were separated by a 20 Å vacuum layer. All unit cells were orthorhombic. The surfaces were stoichiometric anatase slabs, each approximately 12 Å thick, with symmetrical surfaces on both ends (see SI).
Fig. 2.
The periodical models of the (001) (a) and (111) (b) surfaces as cut by the respective lattice and the optimized (111) surface (c). Note the significant change in the geometry of the surface atoms of the slab in comparison to the ideal (111) surface (b) vs (c)
All periodic crystal calculations were carried out using the Vienna ab initio simulation packet (VASP), employing a plane-wave basis set and the projector augmented wave method to account for the distribution of the core electrons [53–56]. Both GGA (PBE [57]) and hybrid DFT (B3LYP [58]) functionals, augmented with the Grimme empirical dispersion with the Becke-Johnson damping function [53–55, 57, 59–61], were used.
The reliability of the periodic calculation was validated by computing the CO properties adsorbed on the anatase surface using the CO-Ti-(O-Ti)n-OX clusters (Fig. S1), which model the (111) anatase surface, where n is either 3 or 5, and X denotes the number of terminating oxygen atoms required to maintain the stoichiometry. The anatase models were derived from the optimized crystal calculations, with only the C-O distance being optimized. Calculations were performed using GGA (PBE) and hybrid functionals of DFT (B3LYP) as well as wavefunction-based MP2 method employing TZVP basis set. The cluster calculations were performed via the ORCA calculation packet [62, 63].
The electrostatic potential (EPS) was calculated for the periodic models using a dense K-point mesh and processed by the Multiwfn—a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer [64, 65]. The resulting data were visualized by the VMD viewer [66].
The average local ionization energy (ALIE) was computed for an isolated CO molecule employing the ORCA package on [67]. As has been demonstrated in ref. [68], the CO molecule represents a challenging system in terms of accurately describing the charge distribution; therefore, a high level of theory is required. Accordingly, the calculations were performed at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV5Z level of theory [68, 69]. The molecular geometry was fully optimized, and the resulting wavefunction was analyzed using the Multiwfn tool. The ALIE isosurface was subsequently visualized with the VMD program.
Analysis of the CO molecule vibration for all models was conducted using the partial Hessian vibrational analysis (PVHA) [70]. We only considered the atoms of the CO molecule and a small part of the framework, specifically the binding Ti atom and all framework oxygens bound to it. We performed frequency calculations based on the harmonic oscillator approximation level of theory. Additionally, we manually visualized all vibration modes to ensure there was no unwanted coupling between the CO vibration and the framework vibrations.
The valence electronic structure of the CO-surface complex was explored using the density of states (DOS) and projected density of states (PDOS) [71]. The DOS data were analyzed using the VASPKIT program [72].
Results and discussion
Periodic calculations on the crystals of (001) and (111) anatase
The optimization of the slabs with the (001) (Fig. 2a) surface resulted in minimal structural changes compared to the ideal configuration, with no alterations in the coordination of Ti atoms and a total relaxation energy of only −0.49 kcal mol−1 per TiO2 unit (i.e., the system is stabilized). In contrast, the geometry of the slab with the (111) surface underwent significant changes. Initially, the pre-optimized slab contained three, four, and six-coordinated atoms in the 1:1:1 ratio (Fig. 2b). During relaxation, the four- and six-coordinated surface Ti atoms shifted toward each other, leading to a new arrangement consisting solely of three and five-coordinated surface atoms, in a 1:2 ratio (Fig. 2c). The relaxation energy was −18.52 kcal mol−1 per TiO2 unit, indicating substantial structural change.
When studying surface models with high surface energy, it is essential to account for the effects of cell size and periodicity [73]. Reference [74] focuses on the water-induced reconstruction on the anatase (001) surface and demonstrates how the size and shape of the supercell influence the formation of defects. In our case, the chosen supercell proves adequate; we tested several unit cells of varying shapes and sizes. All slabs and the vacuum layers had the same thickness. All models were fully optimized. As shown in Table S1, a 2 × 2 orthorhombic cell is sufficient, since the reconstruction energy per TiO2 unit is comparable to that obtained from larger supercells.
To obtain deeper insight into the electronic structure and surface reactivity, the electrostatic potential (ESP) was mapped on both surfaces using an isovalue of 0.001 e·bohr⁻3. The local minima and maxima of the ESP on each surface were identified using the Multiwfn program.
On the (001) surface (Fig. 3), the positively charged five-coordinated Ti atoms appear as a grid of blue lines on the isosurface and are located in close proximity to negatively charged regions associated with surface oxygen atoms, promoting efficient π-backdonation. In contrast, on the (111) surface, positive ESP is localized at the three-coordinated Ti atoms, surrounded by a circular region of negative ESP, which hinders π-backdonation. Additionally, five-coordinated Ti atoms are not distinguishable, suggesting a strong π-backdonation capability of the sight. The absence of a distinct feature at the five-coordinated Ti sites of the (111) surface suggests that these positions are unfavorable for binding.
Fig. 3.
Top-down view of the (001) surface and its electrostatic potential (ESP) isosurface (a) and of the (111) surface and its electrostatic potential isosurface (b). The isovalue was set at 0.001 e·bohr⁻3. The color scale for the (001) surface ranges from 0.00 kcal·mol⁻1 (blue) to 4.28 kcal·mol⁻1 (red). For the (111) surface, the color scale spans from −10.52 kcal·mol⁻1 (blue) to 4.34 kcal·mol⁻1 (red)
A comparison of the ESP maps of the two surfaces reveals a shift in the color scales: Specifically, the three-coordinated Ti atoms on the (111) surface exhibit substantially lower ESP (−10.52 kcal·mol⁻1) than for the (001) surface (0.00 kcal·mol⁻1). This difference suggests that the three-coordinated surface Ti atoms of the (111) surface are likely to serve as stronger binding sites than the five-coordinated Ti atoms of the (001) surface.
To access the reactivity of the CO molecule toward anatase surfaces, the localized average ionization energy (ALIE) was calculated, as it has been shown to correlate closely with chemical reactivity [67].
The ALIE of the CO molecule (Fig. 4) shows that the ionization energy reaches its minimum at the carbon atom and its maximum at the oxygen atom, indicating that the carbon atom serves as a nucleophilic center. This interpretation is supported by the atomic charge analysis, which assigns a negative charge to carbon and a positive charge to oxygen. As already noted, an accurate description of this distribution requires high-level theoretical methods, since lower levels of theory may yield qualitatively incorrect results [68]. Combined with the ESP surface maps, these results indicate that the CO molecule preferentially binds to surface Ti atoms via the nucleophilic carbon atom.
Fig. 4.

The average localized ionization energy (ALIE) of the CO molecule, shown together with the CO molecule itself to indicate orientation (red: oxygen, brown: carbon). The isovalue of the surfaces was set at 0.001 e/bohr3. The color scale ranges from 0.57 eV (blue) to 0.78 eV (red) to achieve an even distribution across the color scale
Benchmark calculations
The performance of PBE and B3LYP functionals (see Table ST in the SI), used for periodic and cluster calculations, respectively, is tested by comparison with MP2 calculations. All methods predict a shortening of the bond relative to the bond length of the isolated CO molecule, with PBE slightly underestimating and B3LYP slightly overestimating the bond length. Furthermore, all approaches agree on a larger effect of binding in the case of three-coordinated Ti. A similar trend was also observed in the calculated CO vibrational frequencies, with all methods indicating a blue shift upon binding.
Periodic calculations
The calculations on the periodic model are summarized in Table 1, which presents data on the orientation of CO adsorbed on TiO2 surfaces, characterized by the angles and close distances between the carbon and surface oxygen atoms. The results show that the regular structure of the (001) surface favors an almost perpendicular binding of CO, while a pronounced tilt is observed on the (111) surface. The number of surface oxygen atoms within 3.6 Å of the adsorbed CO is five, four, and three for the (111) [TiO5], (001) [TiO5], and (111) [TiO3] sites, respectively, with binding energies of 7, 15, and 24 kcal mol⁻1, increasing accordingly. These findings indicate that closely situated surface oxygen atoms destabilize CO. This trend is further supported by variations in Ti–C bond distances and shifts in the CO stretching frequency (νCO). Notably, the CO bond elongates by 0.0033 Å and a red shift of 35 cm⁻1 occurs for the least stable (111) [TiO5] site, while bond shortening of 0.0010 and 0.0056 Å occurs, accompanied by blue shifts of 8 and 43 cm⁻1 for the (001) [TiO5] and (111) [TiO3] sites, respectively. The key characteristics of the CO–surface system (rCO and νCO) were verified using the more reliable B3LYP functional. At this level of theory, the isolated CO molecule has a bond length of 1.1311 Å and a stretching frequency of 2305 cm⁻1. The results follow the same trends as those obtained with the PBE functional: Adsorption of CO on the (001) [TiO5] site leads to a slight shortening of the CO bond (by −0.0029 Å) and a small blue shift (2 cm⁻1). When CO is adsorbed on the (111) [TiO3] site, the bond shortens more significantly (−0.0074 Å) and results in a large blue shift (25 cm⁻1). In contrast, adsorption on the (111) [TiO5] site leads to a notable elongation of the CO bond (0.0147 Å) and a substantial red shift (−64 cm⁻1). Thus, the two functionals are qualitatively consistent.
Table 1.
The geometry parameters (Å), νCO vibrational frequencies (in cm−1), and binding energies (in kcal mol−1) of CO-TiO2 at the (001) [TiO5], (111) [TiO3], and (111) [TiO5] sites obtained from the periodic slab models and large cluster models. The B3LYP/SVP level theory was used for the cluster calculation
| PBE | B3PLYP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rCO/ΔrCO | νCO/ΔνCO | rTi–C | rO–C | Ebind | Θ1[a] | Θ2[b] | rCO/ΔrCO | νCO/ΔνCO | |
| (001) [TiO5] | 1.1424/−0.0010 | 2134/8 | 2.302 |
2.676 2.676 3.335 2.380 |
15 | 91 | 92° | 1.1278/−0.0029 | 2307/2 |
| (111) [TiO3] | 1.1378/−0.0056 | 2169/43 | 2.238 |
2.808 2.873 3.553 |
24 | 78° | 58° | 1.1233/−0.0074 | 2331/25 |
| (111) [TiO5] | 1.1467/0.0033 | 2091/−35 | 2.355 |
2.408 2.831 2.933 2.943 3.533 |
7 | 56° | 76° | 1.1457/0.0147 | 2243/−62 |
[a] ∠(Ti-Ti-C)x, [b] ∠(Ti-Ti-C)y
The electronic structure of the systems is analyzed through changes in the electron density of states upon CO adsorption on anatase surfaces, complemented by the projected DOS method [71]. Furthermore, we present a visualization of the real parts of the electron band structure obtained from the periodic slab models. These band structures resemble the antibonding 5σ (HOMO) and antibonding 2π* (LUMO) orbitals of the isolated CO molecule, providing insight into the interplay between the σ- and π-back donations.
Figure 5 presents the changes in electron density upon CO adsorption. The formation of the Ti–C bond leads to a localized accumulation of electron density, along with charges surrounding the CO oxygen and TiO2 oxygen atoms. Due to the inherent symmetry of the (001) surface, the CO-(001) [TiO5] site displays the most regular pattern of electron density redistribution. Specifically, there is a pronounced electron density accumulation at the Ti–C bond, a slight increase in density on CO oxygen atoms in orbitals perpendicular to the CO bond, and a depletion of electron density in orbitals aligned with the bond axis. Additionally, an enhancement in electron density occurs in some, though not all, surface oxygen atoms. At the CO-(111) [TiO3] site, a significantly larger accumulation of electron density at the Ti–C bond is observed, aligning with the strongest CO binding for this site. In this case, the electronic changes within the CO molecule are primarily confined to the σ-orbitals of the CO bond. In contrast, the CO-(111) [TiO5] site exhibits a more complex redistribution of electron density. While the overall increase along the Ti–C bond is like that of the CO-(111) [TiO3] site, it is accompanied by an asymmetric electron density depletion near a carbon atom. Furthermore, the changes in electron density of anatase oxygen atoms are also non-symmetric.
Fig. 5.
The difference between the electron density of the CO-surface complex and the isolated CO molecule and isolated surface for the CO-(001) [TiO5] (a, b), the CO-(111) [TiO3] (c, d), and the CO-(111) [TiO5] (e, f). Yellow and turquoise collars represent the regions with increased and depleted electron density, respectively (see Eq. S1 in SI)
The distinct electronic behavior resulting from the surface regularity of anatase and the orientation of CO relative to the surface is further evidenced by the visualization of the real part of the wavefunctions intersecting with the 5σ (HOMO, Fig. 6) and 2πx*/2πy* (LUMO, Fig. 7) orbitals. In the case of the (001) surface, a perpendicular orientation is reflected by a clear definition of the 5σ orbital, while it becomes highly delocalized on the (111) surface. This is particularly evident for the (111) [TiO3] site (Fig. 6c, d), where the 5σ orbital is barely distinguishable. Figure 7 displays the real part of the wavefunction associated with 2πx* and 2πy* of CO, showing well-defined orbitals at the (001) surface (Fig. 7a, b). Although the tilt angles of CO to the (111) surface are similar for the [TiO3] and [TiO5] sites—approximately 55° and 77°—the nature of the Ti-binding site differs markedly due to the different characteristics of the (111) surface. While the Ti atom at the [TiO3] site lifts slightly above the surface, it is embedded below the surface plane at the [TiO5] site. As a result, the 2πx* and 2πy* orbitals (Fig. 7c, d) are well defined at the (111) [TiO3] site with electron density contributions, similar to those observed at the (001) [TiO5] site. In contrast, at the (111) [TiO5] site (Fig. 7e, f), the wavefunction is more complex and exhibits significantly higher contributions, with a clear preference for the 2πy* orbital.
Fig. 6.
The real parts of the two-electron band structures reminiscent of the antibonding 5 σ HOMO orbitals from the periodic slab models of the CO-(001) [TiO5] (a, b), the CO-(111) [TiO3] (c, d), and the CO-(111) [TiO5] (e, f). The positive lobes are yellow, and the negative lobes are turquoise
Fig. 7.
The real part of wave functions resembles π*(CO) antibonding orbitals at the (001) [TiO5] (a and b), (111) [TiO3] (c and d), and (111) [TiO5] (e and f) sites. The positive lobes are yellow, and the negative lobes are turquoise
Figure 8 shows the plot of DOS of the occupied valence orbitals, specifically bonding 3σ, antibonding 4σ and 5σ, and degenerate bonding 1πx,y for all three systems compared to those of isolated CO. The plot extends to the Fermi level, at −2.21 eV (CO-(001)) [TiO5], −2.92 eV (CO-(111) [TiO3]), and −2.91 eV (CO-(111) [TiO5]). In every case, 3σ, 4σ, and 1πx,y orbitals destabilize upon binding to the surface. This destabilization is more pronounced in the case of five-coordinated Ti sites when compared to CO-(111) [TiO3]. Importantly, the stabilization of the 5σ orbital is observed only in this scenario. Figure 9 provides more details in the vacant region of the systems, spanning from the 5σ energy level to the Fermi levels—an energy range that remains unoccupied in isolated CO molecules. The integrated areas of total DOS are 0.101, 0.256, and 0.501 for CO-(111)[TiO3], CO-(001)[TiO5], and CO-(111)[TiO5], respectively, aligning with the binding energies and spectral shifts of CO vibrational frequencies.
Fig. 8.

The density of states projected on the valence shell of an isolated molecule (black) and an adsorbed CO molecule (blue) on (001) [TiO5] site (top panel), (111) [TiO3] (middle panel), and (111) [TiO5] (bottom panel)
Fig. 9.
The projected density of states of the antibonding regions (from 5σ to EFermi) of the adsorbed CO molecules on the (001) [TiO5] (a), (111) [TiO3] (b), and (111) [TiO5] (c) sites and the calculated surface area
Figures 10, 11, and 12 offer a more detailed analysis of the backdonation mechanism in CO, emphasizing the contributions of individual surface atoms to the CO DOS. Generally, the occupancy of surface atoms in this energetic region is an order of magnitude greater than that of the CO molecule. For clarity and ease of comparison, we use different scaling for the DOS of CO and surface atoms. In all instances, the Ti-binding site contributes to the 5σ orbital, increasing its electron density and counteracting the stabilization of CO 5σ typically associated with σ-donation. This contribution is consistent across all sites. Interestingly, surface oxygen atoms contribute only at five-coordinated sites. This difference helps explain why the 5σ orbital is stabilized only in the case of the three-coordinated site. The electron density contributions at higher energies are attributed to the π-back donation.
Fig. 10.
The projected DOS at the energy 5σ orbital (a) and antibonding region (b–g) of the CO molecule (blue) at the [TiO5] (001) site compared to Ti and adjacent surface oxygen atoms. Note that the scales of the plots are not the same for the CO molecule (positive) and the neighboring atoms (negative)
Fig. 11.
The projected DOS at the energy 5σ orbital (a) and antibonding region (b–e) of the CO molecule (blue) at the (111) [TiO3] site compared to Ti and adjacent surface oxygen atoms. Note that the scales of the plots are not the same for the CO molecule (positive) and the neighboring atoms (negative)
Fig. 12.
The projected DOS at the energy 5σ orbital (a) and antibonding region (b–h) of the CO molecule (blue) at the (111) [TiO5] site compared to Ti and adjacent surface oxygen atoms. Note that the scales of the plots are not the same for the CO molecule (positive) and the neighboring atoms (negative)
In the case of CO adsorption on the (001) [TiO5] site, five surface oxygen atoms interact with the antibonding region of the adsorbed CO molecule. Due to symmetry, the density of states for O1 and O2, as well as for O3 and O4, is nearly identical. The contributions to the DOS of the 5σ orbital come from O3, O4, and O5 in addition to Ti. In contrast, O1 and O2 closely mirror the antibonding region of CO, indicating their key role in π-backdonation. This effect is illustrated by the electron density difference associated with CO adsorption (Fig. 5a, b). Furthermore, the interaction between CO and O1/O2 is reflected in the electron band structure, which resembles the antibonding 2πx* orbitals (Fig. 7a).
In addition to the absence of DOS at the energy of the 5σ orbital originating from surface oxygen atoms, the overall population of the antibonding region of CO on the (111) [TiO3] site is significantly lower (Fig. 9), even though all three adjacent surface oxygens overlap with the antibonding region of the adsorbed CO molecule (Fig. 11). Moreover, the DOS of those oxygens and that of Ti do not mirror the DOS of the CO molecule, indicating weak electron density sharing. The generally weak π-backdonation is further illustrated by the shape of the band structures corresponding to the LUMO orbitals of CO (Fig. 7c, d), which are asymmetric and poorly defined.
In contrast, the orientation of CO at the (111) [TiO5] site allows six surface oxygen atoms—one of which is not directly bonded to the Ti site atom—to contribute their DOS either at the energy of the 5σ orbital (notably O2, O4, and especially O6) or within the antibonding region of CO (Fig. 12). In this region, the overlap of CO aligns closely with the densities of O1, O2, and O3 states. Notably, at this site, the overall population of the antibonding region is the highest (Fig. 9).
Comparison between different sites
The relative stability of the three studied systems follows this order: (111) [TiO3] > (001) [TiO5] > (111) [TiO5], which correlates with a progressive weakening of the Ti–C bond. At the (111) [TiO3] and (001) [TiO5] sites, the observed shortening of the C–O bond lengths and the corresponding blue shifts of the νCO stretching frequency are consistent with enhanced electron donation from the CO 5σ antibonding orbital. In contrast, although the νCO mode is blue-shifted in calculations for the small (111) [TiO5] cluster, the periodic calculations exhibit a red shift, indicating the significance of other effects originating from a larger surface surrounding. A more detailed analysis of DOS helps rationalize the observed differences. The most apparent spectroscopic and electronic signatures of increased σ-donation of CO bound to (111) [TiO3] are reflected in the stabilization of the 5σ(CO) orbital (Fig. 8), whose DOS overlaps solely with the Ti site atom (Fig. 11). In the antibonding region of the CO molecule, which is the smallest (0.101 states·eV⁻1·unit cell⁻1), there is minimal mirroring of the DOS between CO and those of Ti and surface oxygen atoms, underscoring the dominant role of σ-donation over π-back donation in this system.
DOS calculations further clarify the origin of the distinct spectroscopic signatures observed for CO adsorption on the [TiO5] of the (001) and (111) surfaces—specifically, the blue and red shifts in the ν(CO) stretching frequency, respectively. In both cases, the 5σ(CO) orbital is destabilized upon adsorption; this destabilization is particularly more pronounced on the (001) surface (Fig. 8), despite similar overlaps between the 5σ(CO) orbital and the Ti and surface oxygen states in both systems (Figs. 10 and 12). The main difference arises from the degree of electron population in the CO antibonding region, which is significantly greater for CO adsorbed on the (111) surface (0.501 vs. 0.256 states·eV⁻1·unit cell⁻1 for the (111) and (001) surfaces, respectively). This higher population correlates with a weakening of the C–O bond and the corresponding red shift in ν(CO), indicating more efficient π-backdonation. The difference in π-backdonation efficiency is further affected by the local geometry of the binding sites. On the (001) [TiO5] surface, CO binds nearly perpendicular to the surface, allowing for a well-defined symmetry and spatial alignment that restricts π-backdonation primarily to Ti and a few adjacent surface oxygen atoms. In contrast, on the (111) surface, CO adopts a tilted orientation, and the Ti center is more recessed into the surface topology. This configuration enhances π-backdonation from a broader network of surface oxygen atoms, contributing to the larger antibonding population observed.
These findings align with the previous study on CO adsorption at the anatase (101) [TiO5] and (110) [TiO₄] surfaces reported in reference [31], which emphasizes the critical role of surface topography, beyond just the coordination number of the Ti site, in determining adsorption properties. In particular, the results underscore the significant contribution of surface oxygen atoms as the dominant sources of π-backdonation in such systems.
Conclusion
This study presents a detailed computational investigation of CO adsorption on anatase TiO2 surfaces, focusing on the (001) and (111) facets, employing CO as an IR probe. Our results reveal a substantial reconstruction of the (111) surface from its idealized structure. Notably, we predict that this surface will give rise to two distinct IR signals corresponding to two chemically different surface sites. The analysis shows that adsorption behavior and associated vibrational shifts are strongly influenced by surface geometry and the local coordination environment of Ti atoms.
On the (111) facet, CO interacts differently depending on the site: σ-donation is dominant at the [TiO3] site, whereas π-backdonation prevails at the [TiO5] site, modulated by the presence of nearby oxygen atoms. Vibrational frequency predictions indicate an 8 cm⁻1 blue shift for CO adsorbed on the (001) surface and both a 43 cm⁻1 blue shift and a 7 cm⁻1 red shift for CO on the (111) surface, depending on the adsorption site. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of surface topology—not just Ti coordination—in determining the adsorption characteristics of probe molecules like CO.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(DOCX 1.34 MB )
Acknowledgements
This article has been produced with the financial support of the European Union under the REFRESH–Research Excellence for Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries project number CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048 via the Operational Programme Just Transition (J.V., P.H., and D.N.). J.V. acknowledges the financial support of Palacký University through the Internal Grant Association, project IGA_PrF_2025_003.
Author contributions
J.V. performed the calculations; P.H. provided the background of the study and discussed the results; D.N. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
Open access publishing supported by the institutions participating in the CzechELib Transformative Agreement. Palacky University, IGA_PrF_2025_003, Operational Programme Just Transition, CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048, CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048, CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048.
Data availability
Vacek, Jaroslav (2026), “Theoretical Study of TiO2 Anatase Surfaces via a CO IR Probe.”, Mendeley Data, V3, 10.17632/fvf5khr284.3 (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/fvf5khr284/3).
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ohno T, Sarukawa K, Matsumura M (2002) Crystal faces of rutile and anatase TiO2 particles and their roles in photocatalytic reactions. New J Chem 26:1167–1170 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hoang AT, Pandey A, Chen WH, Ahmed SF, Nižetić S, Ng KH, Said Z, Duong XQ, Ağbulut Ü, Hadiyanto H, Nguyen XP (2023) Hydrogen production by water splitting with support of metal and carbon-based photocatalysts. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11:1221–1252 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ismail AA, Bahnemann DW (2014) Photochemical splitting of water for hydrogen production by photocatalysis: a review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 128:85–101 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tang D, Tan GL, Li GW, Liang JG, Ahmad SM, Bahadur A, Humayun M, Ullah H, Khan A, Bououdina M (2023) State-of-the-art hydrogen generation techniques and storage methods: a critical review. J Energy Storage 64:107196 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng G, Wei Y, Xiong J, Gan Y, Zhu J, Xu F (2017) Same titanium glycolate precursor but different products: successful synthesis of twinned anatase TiO2 nanocrystals with excellent solar photocatalytic hydrogen evolution capability. Inorg Chem Front 4:1319–1329 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Irfan F, Tanveer MU, Moiz MA, Husain SW, Ramzan M (2022) TiO2 as an effective photocatalyst mechanisms, applications, and dopants: a review. Eur Phys J B 95:184 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oyekan KA, Van de Put M, Tiwari S, Rossi C, Esteve A, Vandenberghe W (2022) Re-examining the role of subsurface oxygen vacancies in the dissociation of H2O molecules on anatase TiO2. Appl Surf Sci 594:153452 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ijaz M, Zafar M (2021) Titanium dioxide nanostructures as efficient photocatalyst: progress, challenges and perspective. Int J Energy Res 45:3569–3589 [Google Scholar]
- 9.O’Connor CR, Calegari Andrade MF, Selloni A, Kimmel GA (2023) Elucidating the water-anatase TiO2(101) interface structure using infrared signatures and molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 159:104707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou X, Chen D, Li T, Chen X, Zhu L (2024) Pd and carbon quantum dots co-decorated TiO2 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production and reaction mechanism. Int J Hydrogen Energy 53:1361–1372 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y (2001) Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 293:269–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95:69–96 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khan SUM, Al-Shahry M, Ingler WB (2002) Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science 297:2243–2245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang J, Zhou P, Liu J, Yu J (2014) New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:20382–20386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sakar M, Mithun Prakash R, Trong-On D (2019) Insights into the TiO2-based photocatalytic systems and their mechanisms. Catalysts 9:680 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoffmann R (1988) A chemical and theoretical way to look at bonding on surfaces. Rev Mod Phys 60:601–626 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henderson MA (2011) A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis. Surf Sci Rep 66:185–297 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 48:53–229 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xu H, Reunchan P, Ouyang S, Tong H, Umezawa N, Kako T, Ye J (2013) Anatase TiO2 single crystals exposed with high-reactive 111 facets toward efficient H2 evolution. Chem Mater 25:405–411 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang J, Qian L, Yang L, Tao X, Su K, Wang H, Xi J, Ji Z (2014) Nanoscale anatase TiO2 with dominant 111 facets shows high photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 311:521–528 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu Y, Du YE, Bai Y, An J, Li J, Yang X, Feng Q (2018) Facile synthesis of 101}, {010 and [111]-faceted anatase-TiO2 nanocrystals derived from porous metatitanic acid H2TiO3 for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Chem Sel 3:2867–2876 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Du D, Du Y, Yue W, Yang X (2019) Lithium storage performance of {010}-faceted and [111]-faceted anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. J Cent South Univ 26:1530–1539 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen W, Kuang Q, Wang Q, Xie Z (2015) Engineering a high energy surface of anatase TiO2 crystals towards enhanced performance for energy conversion and environmental applications. RSC Adv 5:20396–20409 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang J, Chen S, Qian L, Tao X, Yang L, Wang H, Li Y, Zhang E, Xi J, Ji Z (2014) Regulating photocatalytic selectivity of anatase TiO 2 with 101}, {001}, and {111 facets. J Am Ceram Soc 97:4005–4010 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee TY, Lee CY, Chiu HT (2018) Enhanced photocatalysis from truncated octahedral bipyramids of anatase TiO2 with exposed 001}/{101 facets. ACS Omega 3:10225–10232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tosoni S, Chen HYT, Pacchioni G (2015) A DFT study of the reactivity of anatase TiO2 and tetragonal ZrO2 stepped surfaces compared to the regular (101) terraces. ChemPhysChem 16:3642–3651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meagher EP, Lager GA (1979) Polyhedral thermal expansion in the TiO 2 polymorphs; refinement of the crystal structures of rutile and brookite at high temperature. Can Mineral 17:77–85 [Google Scholar]
- 29.Horn MSCF, Schwerdtfeger CF, Meagher EP (1972) Refinement of the structure of anatase at several temperatures. Z Kristallogr 136:273–281 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ueba H (1987) Chemical effects on vibrational properties of adsorbed molecules on metal surfaces: coverage dependence. Surf Sci 188:421–455 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deiana C, Fois E, Martra G, Narbey S, Pellegrino F, Tabacchi G (2016) On the simple complexity of carbon monoxide on oxide surfaces: facet-specific donation and backdonation effects revealed on TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. ChemPhysChem 17:1956–1960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lamberti C, Zecchina A, Groppo E, Bordiga S (2010) Probing the surfaces of heterogeneous catalysts by in situ IR spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev 39:4951–5001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang Y, Wöll C (2017) IR spectroscopic investigations of chemical and photochemical reactions on metal oxides: Bridging the materials gap. Chem Soc Rev 46:1875–1932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu M, Noei H, Fink K, Muhler M, Wang Y, Wöll C (2012) The surface science approach for understanding reactions on oxide powders: the importance of IR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:4731–4734 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pacchionia G, Ferrari AM, Bagus PS (1996) Cluster and band structure ab initio calculations on the adsorption of CO on acid sites of the TiO2(110) surface. Surf Sci 350:159–175 [Google Scholar]
- 36.Casarin M, Maccato C, Vittadini A (1998) Molecular chemisorption on TiO2(110): a local point of view. J Phys Chem B 102:10745–10752 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Setvin M, Buchholz M, Hou W, Zhang C, Stöger B, Hulva J, Simschitz T, Shi X, Pavelec J, Parkinson GS, Xu M, Wang Y, Schmid M, Wöll C, Selloni A, Diebold U (2015) A multitechnique study of CO adsorption on the TiO2 anatase (101) surface. J Phys Chem C 119:21044–21052 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Petrik NG, Kimmel GA (2012) Adsorption geometry of CO versus coverage on TiO2(110) from s- and p-polarized infrared spectroscopy. J Phys Chem Lett 3:3425–3430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lustemberg PG, Scherlis DA (2013) Monoxide carbon frequency shift as a tool for the characterization of TiO2 surfaces: insights from first principles spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 138:124702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zaera F (2014) New advances in the use of infrared absorption spectroscopy for the characterization of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem Soc Rev 43:7624–7663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hadjiivanov KI, Vayssilov GN (2002) Characterization of oxide surfaces and zeolites by carbon monoxide as an IR probe molecule. Adv Catal 47:307–511 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Busca G, Saussey H, Saur O, Lavalley JC, Lorenzelli V (1985) FT-IR characterization of the surface acidity of different titanium dioxide anatase preparations. Appl Catal 14:245–260 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hadjiivanov KI, Klissurski DG (1996) Surface chemistry of titania (anatase) and titania-supported catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 25:61–69 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liao L, Zhang Q, Su Z, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Li Y, Lu X, Wei D, Feng G, Yu Q, Cai X, Zhao J, Ren Z, Fang H, Robles-Hernandez F, Baldelli S, Bao J (2014) Efficient solar water-splitting using a nanocrystalline CoO photocatalyst. Nat Nanotechnol 9:69–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao Z, Li Z, Zou Z (2011) Understanding the interaction of water with anatase TiO2 (101) surface from density functional theory calculations. Phys Lett A 375:2939–2945 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Erdogan R, Ozbek O, Onal I (2010) A periodic DFT study of water and ammonia adsorption on anatase TiO2 (001) slab. Surf Sci 604:1029–1033 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu H, Zhao M, Lei Y, Pan C, Xiao W (2012) Formaldehyde on TiO2 anatase (1 0 1): a DFT study. Comput Mater Sci 51:389–395 [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gong XQ, Selloni A, Vittadini A (2006) Density functional theory study of formic acid adsorption on anatase TiO2(001): geometries, energetics, and effects of coverage, hydration, and reconstruction. J Phys Chem B 110:2804–2811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang R, Liu Z, Ling L, Wang B (2015) The effect of anatase TiO 2 surface structure on the behavior of ethanol adsorption and its initial dissociation step: a DFT study. Appl Surf Sci 353:150–157 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen HYT, Tosoni S, Pacchioni G (2016) A DFT study of the acid–base properties of anatase TiO2 and tetragonal ZrO2 by adsorption of CO and CO2 probe molecules. Surf Sci 652:163–171 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shi Z, Lin L, Chen R, Yan L (2021) Adsorption of CO molecules on anatase TiO2(001) loaded with noble metals M (M = Ir/Pd/Pt): a study from DFT calculations. Mater Today Commun 28:102699 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Scaranto J, Giorgianni S (2013) DFT calculations of carbon monoxide adsorbed on anatase TiO 2 (101) and (001) surfaces: correlation between the binding energy and the CO stretching frequency. Mol Simul 39:245–249 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 54:11169–11186 [Google Scholar]
- 56.Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 59:1758–1775 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37:785–789 [Google Scholar]
- 59.Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L (2011) Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J Comput Chem 32:1456–1465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Perdew JP, Ernzerhof M, Burke K (1996) Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J Chem Phys 105:9982–9985 [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ernzerhof M, Scuseria GE (1999) Assessment of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J Chem Phys 110:5029–5036 [Google Scholar]
- 62.Neese F (2012) The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2:73–78 [Google Scholar]
- 63.Neese F (2018) Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 8:e1327 [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lu T, Chen F (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33:580–592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lu T (2024) A comprehensive electron wavefunction analysis toolbox for chemists, Multiwfn. J Chem Phys 161:082503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sjoberg P, Murray JS, Brinck T, Politzer P (1990) Average local ionization energies on the molecular surfaces of aromatic systems as guides to chemical reactivity. Can J Chem 68:1440–1443 [Google Scholar]
- 68.Scuseria GE, Miller MD, Jensen F, Geertsen J (1991) The dipole moment of carbon monoxide. J Chem Phys 94:6660–6663 [Google Scholar]
- 69.Raghavachari K, Trucks GW, Pople JA, Head-Gordon M (2013) Reprint of: a fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories. Chem Phys Lett 589:37–40 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li H, Jensen JH (2002) Partial hessian vibrational analysis: the localization of the molecular vibrational energy and entropy. Theor Chem Acc 107:211–219 [Google Scholar]
- 71.Blöchl PE, Jepsen O, Andersen OK (1994) Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 49:16223–16233 [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang V, Xu N, Liu JC, Tang G, Geng WT (2021) VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun 267:108033 [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tran R, Xu Z, Radhakrishnan B, Winston D, Sun W, Persson KA, Ong SP (2016) Data descriptor: surface energies of elemental crystals. Sci Data 3:160080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zollo G, Vitale E (2018) A deeper insight on the stability of water-induced reconstruction of anatase (001) surface. Appl Sci 8:2522 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX 1.34 MB )
Data Availability Statement
Vacek, Jaroslav (2026), “Theoretical Study of TiO2 Anatase Surfaces via a CO IR Probe.”, Mendeley Data, V3, 10.17632/fvf5khr284.3 (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/fvf5khr284/3).










