Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Apr 13;198(5):450. doi: 10.1007/s10661-026-15317-x

Correction to: Exploring effectiveness of two common trap designs for capturing fish diversity in small freshwater bodies

Kiran Thomas 1,2,, Milan Gottwald 3, Daniel Bartoň 1, Zuzana Šmejkalová 1, Marek Šmejkal 1,2
PMCID: PMC13076552  PMID: 41973137

Correction to: Environ Monit Assess (2026) 198:320

10.1007/s10661-026-15133-3

In the published version of this article, Figure [1, 2 and 4] appeared with insufficient resolution, affecting its clarity. The figure has now been replaced with a higher-resolution version below.

graphic file with name 10661_2026_15317_Figa_HTML.jpgFig. 1 Umbrella shaped trap and fyke net used for sampling the sites

graphic file with name 10661_2026_15317_Figb_HTML.jpgFig. 2 Location map of the sites sampled for fish assemblages using fyke nets and umbrella traps across the Czech Republic. Major river basins are depicted for geographic context. The inset shows the position of the Czech Republic (highlighted in red) within the European Union

graphic file with name 10661_2026_15317_Figc_HTML.jpgFig. 4 Rarefaction curves showing the number of species caught by fyke netting and by umbrella trapping against the number of individuals caught from each site during the sampling for same duration of sampling effort at a particular site. Each line on the panel represents a site. Steep initial slope indicates that many new species are found with each additional sample. Plateau suggests that most species in the area have been sampled, indicating sampling sufficiency. The umbrella traps with the higher curve at similar sample sizes typically capture greater species richness. The index lines on both the X and Y axis denote benchmark values for total individuals sampled or species saturation thresholds, respectively. These help visualize sampling sufficiency and trap type comparison at equal effort levels

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES