Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Mar 26;28(14):4597–4602. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6c00974

Nickel-Catalyzed Aminocarbonylation of Aryl Trifluoromethoxides

Zhen-Wei Liu †,, Chang-Sheng Kuai , Xiao-Feng Wu †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC13077685  PMID: 41885369

Abstract

Aryl trifluoromethoxides (ArOCF3) are widely employed in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, which leads to their transformation also being attractive. Here we report a nickel-catalyzed aminocarbonylation of ArOCF3 with amines using inositol hexaformate (HFI) as the CO source, providing a potential approach for the chemical upcycling of these persistent compounds into value-added benzamide derivatives. The reaction exhibits broad compatibility with diverse aniline derivatives, accommodating various electronic and steric demands. This work not only expands the aryl source for amide synthesis from conventional electrophiles to the highly robust ArOCF3 motif but also offers a blueprint for phenol activation.


graphic file with name ol6c00974_0011.jpg


graphic file with name ol6c00974_0010.jpg


The aryl trifluoromethoxide (ArOCF3) motif is a privileged structure in modern pharmaceutical and agrochemical discovery, prized for the unique combination of high lipophilicity, strong electron-withdrawing character, and exceptional metabolic inertness offered by the trifluoromethoxy group (Scheme A). Yet this chemical “double-edged sword” carries an unintended environmental consequence: the very inertness that underpins its desirable traits now raises concerns over persistence (Scheme B). Addressing the challenges outlined above, the development of mild and selective methods for cleaving the C­(sp2)–OCF3 bond in ArOCF3 offers not only a promising strategy for remediating persistent pollutants but also an opportunity for the chemical upcycling of waste aromatic resources into value-added products. However, such transformations are inherently challenging. The bond dissociation energy (BDE) of the C­(sp2)–OCF3 bond is reported to be approximately 110 kcal/mol, ranking among the strongest C­(sp2)–heteroatom bonds known. This value substantially exceeds those of C­(sp2)–Br (82 kcal/mol), C­(sp2)–Cl (97 kcal/mol), and even the C­(sp2)–OCH3 bond in anisole (102 kcal/mol) (Scheme C). Consequently, the development of catalytic systems capable of overcoming these thermodynamics represents a critical step toward the resourceful utilization of ArOCF3-bearing waste materials.

1. Chemistry of Aryl Trifluoromethoxides and Nickel Catalyst.

1

Transition-metal catalysis has emerged as a powerful platform for carbonylative transformations of inert C–O bonds. Palladium catalysts, despite their widespread application in carbonylative cross-coupling reactions, are inherently limited by their Pd(0)/Pd­(II) two-electron redox cycles. This mechanistic constraint renders them ill-equipped for oxidative addition into the exceptionally strong C–OCF3 bond. Moreover, in carbonylative transformations, the coordination of carbon monoxide to the metal center attenuates electron density, further diminishing oxidative addition capacity, a challenge particularly acute for highly stable substrates such as ArOCF3. This limitation prompted us to explore alternative catalyst systems.

In contrast, nickel catalysts offer distinct advantages in this challenging carbonylative transformation. The electron-rich nature and smaller atomic radius of nickel species facilitate insertion into inert C–O bonds under carbonylative conditions. , More distinctively, nickel catalysis is not confined to conventional Ni(0)/Ni­(II) pathways; it can also involve Ni­(I)/Ni­(III) manifolds via single-electron redox processes (Scheme D). This valence diversity may provide additional mechanistic channels and operational flexibility for activating strong bonds in the presence of CO, an advantage that is particularly pertinent, given the electron-withdrawing effect of CO coordination discussed above. Moreover, the substantially lower cost of nickel relative to palladium offers a distinct advantage in terms of sustainability, aligning with the principles of green chemistry and resource utilization.

In nickel-catalyzed C­(sp2)–heteroatom cross-couplings, Ni­(I) species are frequently invoked as key intermediates, spurring the development of efficient methods for their generation. Current approaches include photoredox catalysis, electrochemical reduction, pulse radiolysis, and the use of heterogeneous, preactivated zinc metal (Scheme E). , However, these methods often suffer from limitations ranging from specialized equipment requirements to heterogeneous reaction conditions. Organosilanes have recently emerged as particularly attractive alternatives: they reduce Ni­(II) to catalytically active Ni­(I) species under mild, homogeneous conditions, offering operational simplicity while circumventing the heterogeneity inherent to metallic reductants. ,

The benzamide scaffold is ubiquitous in pharmaceuticals, and aminocarbonylation offers an ideal choice. However, the use of aryl trifluoromethyl ethers as substrates remains unprecedented. Herein, we report the first nickel-catalyzed aminocarbonylation of ArOCF3 with amines, enabled by a silane reduction strategy (Scheme F). This work offers a potential approach for the chemical upcycling of environmentally persistent pollutants and expands the aryl source for benzamide synthesis to the ArOCF3 motif.

Due to the strong coordination tendency between nickel and carbon monoxide, nickel(0) species readily bind multiple CO ligands to form polycarbonyl complexes such as Ni­(CO)4. The electron density of these species is significantly depleted by the strong π-accepting ability of CO, which severely attenuates their capacity for oxidative addition to inert electrophiles and thereby impedes catalytic turnover. To address this issue, two complementary strategies have been developed. The first involves the design of sterically hindered multidentate ligands that preoccupy coordination sites on nickel, sterically preventing the binding of multiple CO ligands while preserving the electron-rich nature and reactivity of the nickel center. The second strategy employs CO surrogates that release CO slowly under reaction conditions, maintaining a low instantaneous CO concentration and thus circumventing overcoordination at the source.

Building upon these insights, we selected the aminocarbonylation of 4-acetylphenyl trifluoromethyl ether with aniline as a model substrate to systematically optimize the reaction conditions (Table ). Gratifyingly, the desired benzamide product 1 was obtained in 74% GC and 73% isolated yields under the following optimized conditions: NiCl2·6H2O as the catalyst, p-MeO-Phen as the ligand, phenylsilane as the reductant, HFI as the CO source, and DBU as the base, in NMP at 140 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere for 18 h (entry 1). The ligand structure proved critical for reaction efficiency. Replacing the 4,7-dimethoxy substituents on the phenanthroline backbone with methyl groups or hydrogen atoms led to a marked decrease in yield (entries 2, 3), suggesting that electron-rich ligands facilitate the oxidative addition of the nickel species into the C­(sp2)–OCF3 bond. When the rigid phenanthroline scaffold was replaced with the more flexible p-MeO-Bpy, a significant drop in yield was observed (entry 4), indicating that the ligand rigidity may be essential for maintaining catalytic activity. The nickel source also exerted a substantial influence. Substituting NiCl2·6H2O with less hygroscopic Ni­(acac)2, which is easier to handle under ambient conditions, resulted in a diminished yield of 60% (entry 5). Evaluation of alternative reductants revealed that inexpensive diphenylsilane afforded the product in 68% yield (entry 6), potentially due to increased steric hindrance impeding the reduction of Ni­(II). Notably, the greener homogeneous reductant B2pin2 delivered only trace amounts of the desired product (entry 7), underscoring the unique efficacy of silanes in this transformation. Base screening demonstrated that DBU was uniquely effective, which may also activate silane for nickel reduction; replacement with the organic weak base DIPEA or inorganic Na2CO3 resulted in negligible product formation (entries 8, 9). Further optimization revealed that solvent choice, reaction time, and temperature significantly impact catalytic performance (entries 10–13). Control experiments confirmed the essential roles of both the nickel catalyst and phenylsilane: no product was detected in their absence, lending support to the involvement of a Ni­(I) species as the catalytically active intermediate (entries 14, 15). It is worth mentioning that a noncarbonylation compound was the main byproduct detectable during the study.

1. Screening of the Conditions .

graphic file with name ol6c00974_0009.jpg

Entry Variations Yield (%)
1 none 74 (73)
2 p-Me-Phen 25
3 1,10-Phen 5
4 p-MeO-Phen 30
5 Ni(acac)2 60
6 Ph2SiH2 68
7 B2pin2 11
8 DIPEA 0
9 Na2CO3 8
10 MeCN 24
11 THF 0
12 12 h 37
13 130 °C 11
14 w/o NiCl2·6H2O 0
15 w/o PhSiH3 0
a

Reactions were performed on a 0.2 mmol scale, aryl trifluoromethoxides (1.0 equiv), amine (3.0 equiv).

b

Yields were determined by GC-MS analysis of the crude product using n-dodecane as the internal standard.

c

Isolated yield.

With the optimized catalytic system in hand, we next explored the scope of this procedure (Scheme ). In the examination of various aniline derivatives, the steric environment of the aniline coupling partner proved to have a pronounced effect on the reaction efficiency. As the steric bulk of ortho-substituents increased, a corresponding decrease in yield was observed (1–3, 73–49%). Notably, when the ortho-position bore a phenyl group or two methyl substituents, the desired products were obtained in less than 30% yield (4, 5), underscoring the sensitivity of this transformation to steric congestion. In contrast, para-substituted anilines were well tolerated regardless of electronic nature: electron-donating groups (Me, Et, t Bu, MeO) afforded the corresponding benzamides in good yields (69, 62–78%), and electron-withdrawing substituents such as fluoro and trifluoromethoxy groups also delivered similar yields (10, 11, 47–79%). meta-Substituted anilines also participated smoothly, providing the desired products in good yields (12–15, 44–74%). Notably, the reaction exhibited excellent functional group tolerance: methoxy, trifluoromethoxy, and fluoro substituents were all compatible with the catalytic conditions (9–11, 15, 16, and 18), offering handles for further synthetic elaboration. Disappointingly, anilines bearing polyaromatic motifs furnished only trace amounts of the desired products (19), highlighting the current limitations of the method. Polysubstituted anilines were generally well accommodated, delivering the corresponding benzamides in moderate yields (5, 17, 18, 27–47%).

2. Scope of Substrates a .

2

Encouraged by the broad compatibility with diverse anilines, we next turned our attention to the aryl trifluoromethyl ether component. Unfortunately, substrate variation on this coupling partner proved challenging: beyond the 4-acetyl-substituted model substrate, aryl trifluoromethyl ethers bearing electron-withdrawing groups or lacking substituents afforded only trace amounts of the desired products, while those bearing electron-donating groups or fluoro substituents failed to deliver any detectable product (2024). Further details regarding unsuccessful substrates are provided in the Supporting Information (SI). These results indicate that the current catalytic system is highly sensitive to the electronic and structural features of the ArOCF3 coupling partner. Despite these limitations, this work represents a crucial proof-of-concept for nickel-catalyzed aminocarbonylation via C­(sp2)–OCF3 bond cleavage, offering a glimpse of the potential for upgrading persistent fluorinated pollutants into value-added benzamide derivatives.

To gain insight into the catalytic cycle of this transformation, a series of mechanistic experiments were conducted (Scheme ). First, the origin of the carbonyl group in the amide product was probed. Under the standard reaction conditions, the desired benzamide was obtained in 73% yield. In contrast, when the reaction was performed in the absence of HFI, neither product was detectable. This result unequivocally establishes that the carbonyl moiety of the amide originates from HFI rather than from decomposition of the labile trifluoromethoxy anion (OCF3 ) to carbonyl fluoridea pathway that could potentially serve as an alternative CO source (Scheme A). Next, the oxidation state of the catalytically active nickel species was investigated. When Ni­(cod)2 was employed as the catalyst in the absence of silane, only trace amounts of the desired amide were detected. However, upon the addition of phenylsilane to the same Ni­(cod)2 precatalyst, the yield increased markedly to 41% (Scheme B).

3. Control Experiments and Proposed Mechanism.

3

This striking difference suggests that a Ni­(I) species, generated in situ via silane-mediated reduction of Ni­(II) or comproportionation between Ni(0) and Ni­(II), is likely the catalytically active species rather than Ni(0) itself. To further corroborate this hypothesis, a catalytic reaction employing an independently prepared Ni­(I) complex was conducted. Unexpectedly, only trace amounts of the desired product were observed under these conditions (Scheme C). This result may be rationalized by the tendency of Ni­(I) species to undergo rapid dimerization at elevated concentrations in the absence of electrophilic coupling partners, forming catalytically inactive dimers and thereby diminishing the yield. Collectively, these experiments support the involvement of a Ni­(I) intermediate while highlighting the critical role of silane in both generating and stabilizing the active nickel species throughout catalytic turnover.

Based on our results and literature, a plausible catalytic cycle is proposed (Scheme D). The cycle commences with reduction of Ni­(II) precursor I by phenylsilane to generate catalytically active Ni­(I) species II. This Ni­(I) intermediate then undergoes oxidative addition into the C­(sp2)–OCF3 bond of the aryl trifluoromethyl ether, affording Ni­(III) aryl species III. Concurrently, HFI decomposes under basic conditions at elevated temperature to release carbon monoxide, which coordinates to the nickel center of III and subsequently undergoes migratory insertion to yield the Ni­(III) acyl complex IV. In the presence of DBU, ligand exchange with the amine coupling partner furnishes the Ni­(III) intermediate V, which upon reductive elimination delivers the desired benzamide product and regenerates the Ni­(I) species II to re-enter the catalytic cycle. Notably, a competing disproportionation pathway may operate in parallel: the Ni­(I) species can undergo comproportionation with the Ni­(III) intermediate to generate the Ni­(II) complex. This off-cycle Ni­(II) species is subsequently reduced back to the active Ni­(I) catalyst by phenylsilane, thereby sustaining catalytic turnover. Throughout the cycle, phenylsilane plays a crucial role in initiating and maintaining the catalytic cycle through reduction of Ni­(II) to Ni­(I). The interplay between these pathways highlights the critical role of silane in enabling this challenging transformation.

In summary, we have developed the first nickel-catalyzed aminocarbonylation of aryl trifluoromethyl ethers. This transformation is enabled by a silane reduction strategy that generates catalytically active Ni­(I) species. The reaction exhibits broad compatibility with diverse aniline derivatives, accommodating various electronic and steric demands, although the scope of aryl trifluoromethyl ethers currently remains limited to activated substrates. This work not only offers a potential approach for the chemical upcycling of persistent fluorinated pollutants into value-added benzamide derivatives but also expands the aryl source for amide synthesis from conventional electrophiles to the highly robust ArOCF3 motif.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFA1507500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22302198, 22572190, 22571291), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB1530000).

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.6c00974.

  • Experimental details, characterization data, and NMR spectra (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Shishkov I. F., Geise H. J., Van Alsenoy C., Khristenko L. V., Vilkov L. V., Senyavian V. M., Van der Veken B., Herrebout W., Lokshin B. V., Garkusha O. G.. Trifluoromethoxy benzene in the gas phase studied by electron diffraction and spectroscopy supplemented with ab initio calculations. J. Mol. Struct. 2001;567–568:339–360. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2860(01)00564-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hojczyk K. N., Feng P., Zhan C., Ngai M.-Y.. Trifluoromethoxylation of Arenes: Synthesis of ortho-Trifluoromethoxylated Aniline Derivatives by OCF3Migration. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:14559–14563. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moujalled D., White A. R.. Advances in the Development of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:227–243. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tlili A., Toulgoat F., Billard T.. Synthetic Approaches to Trifluoromethoxy-Substituted Compounds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:11726–11735. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Inoue M., Sumii Y., Shibata N.. Contribution of Organofluorine Compounds to Pharmaceuticals. ACS Omega. 2020;5:10633–10640. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Murphy C. D., Clark B. R., Amadio J.. Metabolism of fluoroorganic compounds in microorganisms: impacts for the environment and the production of fine chemicals. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009;84:617–629. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grandjean P., Clapp R.. Changing Interpretation of Human Health Risks from Perfluorinated Compounds. Public Health Rep. 2014;129:482–485. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seong H. J., Kwon S. W., Seo D.-C., Kim J.-H., Jang Y.-S.. Enzymatic defluorination of fluorinated compounds. Applied Biological Chem. 2019;62:62. doi: 10.1186/s13765-019-0469-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Han J., Kiss L., Mei H., Remete A. M., Ponikvar-Svet M., Sedgwick D. M., Roman R., Fustero S., Moriwaki H., Soloshonok V. A.. Chemical Aspects of Human and Environmental Overload with Fluorine. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4678–4742. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dankwardt J. W.. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Aryl Grignard Reagents with Aromatic Alkyl Ethers: An Efficient Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Biaryls. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004;43:2428–2432. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mkrtchyan S., Jakubczyk M., Budzák Š., Benická B., Iaroshenko V. O.. Introducing Trifluoromethoxyarenes as Halide Surrogates in Mechanochemical Realizations of Ni-catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2023;12:e202300094. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.202300094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheng H., Liu Q., Zhang B.-B., Wang Z.-X., Chen X.-Y.. Visible-Light-Induced N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Catalyzed Single Electron Reduction of Mono-Fluoroarenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202218468. doi: 10.1002/anie.202218468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeong J., Lee J. H., Lee E.. Iron-Catalyzed Borylation of Aryl Trifluoromethoxides. Org. Lett. 2025;27:5852–5857. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang Z., Garg A., Besset T.. Strategic advances in C–OCF3 bond transformations. Chem. Commun. 2025;61:15329–15332. doi: 10.1039/D5CC03991F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Satoh T., Ikeda M., Kushino Y., Miura M., Nomura M.. Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation of Allyl Alcohols in the Presence of Phenols. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:2662–2664. doi: 10.1021/jo962387n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiao W.-J., Alper H.. Highly Regioselective Thiocarbonylation of Allylic Alcohols with Thiols and Carbon Monoxide Catalyzed by Palladium Complexes: A New and Efficient Route to β,γ-Unsaturated Thioesters. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:7939–7944. doi: 10.1021/jo9812328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Q., Wu L., Jiao H., Fang X., Jackstell R., Beller M., Domino Catalysis. Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation of Allylic Alcohols to β,γ-Unsaturated Esters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52:8064–8068. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong K., Sang R., Liu J., Razzaq R., Franke R., Jackstell R., Beller M.. Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation of sec- and tert-Alcohols. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:6203–6207. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider C., Jackstell R., Maes B. U. W., Beller M.. Palladium-Catalyzed Alkoxycarbonylation of sec-Benzylic Ethers. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020;2020:932–936. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201901592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, J. ; Yang, Q. ; Qi, Y. ; Jiang, H. , Palladium-catalyzed ionic liquids-mediated cascade carbonylative alkynylation of diaryl ethers with alkynes. Green Synth. Catal. 2025, 10.1016/j.gresc.2025.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu X.-F.. Palladium-catalyzed carbonylative transformation of aryl chlorides and aryl tosylates. RSC Adv. 2016;6:83831–83837. doi: 10.1039/C6RA18388C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ai H.-J., Franke R., Wu X.-F.. Pd/C-Catalyzed methoxycarbonylation of aryl chlorides. Mol. Catal. 2020;493:111043. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bao Z.-P., Wang L.-C., Wu X.-F.. Carbonylation: Unlocking Opportunities for Bioactive Molecule and Pharmaceutical Development. ACS Catal. 2025;15:19580–19606. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c07031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu Z.-W., Yang H., Bao Z.-P., Zhang J., Wu X.-F.. Mannitol-Based CO Surrogate for Palladium-Catalyzed Alkoxycarbonylation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2025;28:e202401363. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202401363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu Z.-W., Huo Y.-W., Wu X.-F.. Palladium-Catalyzed Aryloxycarbonylayion of Aryl Bromides with Phenols Using Inositol Hexaformate as an Efficient CO Source. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2026;368(3):e70261. doi: 10.1002/adsc.70261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, W. ; Qin, X. ; Sun, S. ; Xu, T. ; Wu, X.-F. ; Yin, Z. . A Direct Route to Ynones: Pd-Catalyzed Sonogashira Carbonylative Coupling of Ethers with Alkynes via C-O Cleavage. Chem. Commun. 2026, 62, 5960 10.1039/D6CC00779A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Torres G. M., Liu Y., Arndtsen B. A.. A dual light-driven palladium catalyst: Breaking the barriers in carbonylation reactions. Science. 2020;368:318–323. doi: 10.1126/science.aba5901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang C., Wu X., Li H., Qu J., Chen Y.. Carbonylative Cross-Coupling Reaction of Allylic Alcohols and Organoalanes with 1 atm CO Enabled by Nickel Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202210484. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yoo C., Bhattacharya S., See X. Y., Cunningham D. W., Acosta-Calle S., Perri S. T., West N. M., Mason D. C., Meade C. D., Osborne C. W., Turner P. W., Kilgore R. W., King J., Cowden J. H., Grajeda J. M., Miller A. J. M.. Nickel-catalyzed ester carbonylation promoted by imidazole-derived carbenes and salts. Science. 2023;382:815–820. doi: 10.1126/science.ade3179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bena, A. R. ; Banik, T. ; Giannoudis, C. ; Ortis, F. ; Bím, D. ; Baunis, H. ; Palissery, G. H. ; Pieber, B. . Ligand design overcomes bottlenecks in Ni­(I)-catalyzed C­(sp2)-heteroatom couplings. ChemRxiv 2025. (1111), 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-1czpp-v2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ananikov V. P.. Nickel: The “Spirited Horse” of Transition Metal Catalysis. ACS Catal. 2015;5:1964–1971. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin C.-Y., Power P. P.. Complexes of Ni­(i): a “rare” oxidation state of growing importance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:5347–5399. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00216E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tasker S. Z., Standley E. A., Jamison T. F.. Recent advances in homogeneous nickel catalysis. Nature. 2014;509:299–309. doi: 10.1038/nature13274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bena A. R., Pieber B.. Advances in NiI/NiIII-Catalyzed C­(sp2)–Heteroatom Cross-Couplings. ACS Catal. 2026;16:866–881. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c07964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Terrett J. A., Cuthbertson J. D., Shurtleff V. W., MacMillan D. W. C.. Switching on elusive organometallic mechanisms with photoredox catalysis. Nature. 2015;524:330–334. doi: 10.1038/nature14875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Levin M. D., Kim S., Toste F. D.. Photoredox Catalysis Unlocks Single-Electron Elementary Steps in Transition Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling. ACS Central Science. 2016;2:293–301. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Twilton J., Le C., Zhang P., Shaw M. H., Evans R. W., MacMillan D. W. C.. The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017;1:0052. doi: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu C., Yue H., Chu L., Rueping M.. Recent advances in photoredox and nickel dual-catalyzed cascade reactions: pushing the boundaries of complexity. Chem. Sci. 2020;11:4051–4064. doi: 10.1039/D0SC00712A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li C., Kawamata Y., Nakamura H., Vantourout J. C., Liu Z., Hou Q., Bao D., Starr J. T., Chen J., Yan M., Baran P. S.. Electrochemically Enabled, Nickel-Catalyzed Amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:13088–13093. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lu J., Wang Y., McCallum T., Fu N.. Harnessing Radical Chemistry via Electrochemical Transition Metal Catalysis. iScience. 2020;23:101796. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Truesdell B. L., Hamby T. B., Sevov C. S.. General C­(sp2)–C­(sp3) Cross-Electrophile Coupling Reactions Enabled by Overcharge Protection of Homogeneous Electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:5884–5893. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Till N. A., Oh S., MacMillan D. W. C., Bird M. J.. The Application of Pulse Radiolysis to the Study of Ni­(I) Intermediates in Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:9332–9337. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c04652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gu J., Wang X., Xue W., Gong H.. Nickel-catalyzed reductive coupling of alkyl halides with other electrophiles: concept and mechanistic considerations. Org. Chem. Front. 2015;2:1411–1421. doi: 10.1039/C5QO00224A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sun R., Qin Y., Nocera D. G.. General Paradigm in Photoredox Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Allows for Light-Free Access to Reactivity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:9527–9533. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang L., Yan Y., Cao N., Hao J., Li G., Zhang W., Cao R., Wang C., Xiao J., Xue D.. Ni­(I)-Catalyzed Hydroxylation of Aryl Halides with Water under Thermal Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2022;24:9431–9435. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang L., Jiao H.-J., Song G., Huang Y.-R., Ji N., Xue D., He W.. Thermal Nickel-Catalyzed Carbon–Oxygen Cross-Coupling of (Hetero)­aryl Halides with Alcohols Enabled by the Use of a Silane Reductant Approach. ACS Catal. 2024;14:7846–7852. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c01283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Huo Y.-W., Yao L., Qi X., Wu X.-F.. Nickel-catalyzed reductive aminocarbonylation of vinyl triflates with nitro compounds for the synthesis of α,β-unsaturated amides. Org. Chem. Front. 2021;8:6974–6978. doi: 10.1039/D1QO01508G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao X., Feng X., Chen F., Zhu S., Qing F.-L., Chu L.. Divergent Aminocarbonylations of Alkynes Enabled by Photoredox/Nickel Dual Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:26511–26517. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ito Y., Nakatani S., Shiraki R., Kodama T., Tobisu M.. Nickel-Catalyzed Addition of C–C Bonds of Amides to Strained Alkenes: The 1,2-Carboaminocarbonylation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:662–666. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c09265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu Z.-W., Wang Y., A R.-H., Wu X.-F.. Nickel-catalyzed aminocarbonylation of aryl chlorides enabled by a newly designed CO source. Chem. Sci. 2025;16:23315–23320. doi: 10.1039/D5SC07751F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Andersen T. L., Donslund A. S., Neumann K. T., Skrydstrup T.. Carbonylative Coupling of Alkyl Zinc Reagents with Benzyl Bromides Catalyzed by a Nickel/NN2 Pincer Ligand Complex. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:800–804. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chen X., Chen G., Lian Z.. Recent Advances in Nickel Catalyzed Carbonylative Reactions via the Insertion of Carbon Monoxide. Chin. J. Chem. 2024;42:177–189. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202300426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhu C., Yue H., Jia J., Rueping M.. Nickel-Catalyzed C-Heteroatom Cross-Coupling Reactions under Mild Conditions via Facilitated Reductive Elimination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:17810–17831. doi: 10.1002/anie.202013852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Song G., Song J., Dong J., Li G., Fan J., Xue D.. Ni-Catalyzed Photochemial Sulfamidation of Aryl Chlorides with Soluble Organic Amine as Base. Organometallics. 2024;43:1706–1712. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.3c00506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Chakrabarti, S. ; Chae, J. B. ; Knecht, K. A. ; Cedron, N. D. ; Woods, T. J. ; Mirica, L. M. , Catalytically competent nickel­(I)–isocyanide compounds for cross-coupling reactions. Nat. Catal. 2026, 10.1038/s41929-025-01473-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES