Skip to main content
Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers logoLink to Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers
. 2018 Feb 6;21(2):277–285. doi: 10.3233/CBM-170354

Knockdown of long noncoding RNA FGFR3- AS1 induces cell proliferation inhibition, apoptosis and motility reduction in bladder cancer

Xinhui Liao a,1, Jieqing Chen a,1, Yuchen Liu a,b, Anbang He a, Jianting Wu a, Jianli Cheng a, Xintao Zhang a, Zhaojie Lv a, Feng Wang a, Hongbing Mei a,*
PMCID: PMC13078262  PMID: 29226855

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To study the expression pattern of long non-coding RNA FGFR3 antisense transcript 1(FGFR3-AS1) and the cell proliferation inhibition, apoptosis, and motility changes induced by silencing FGFR3-AS1 in bladder cancer.

METHODS:

The differential expression levels of FGFR3-AS1 and FGFR3 in tumor tissues and paired normal tissues were determined using Real-Time qPCR in a total of 36 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer (urothelial carcinoma). Pearson’s coefficient correlation was used for expression correlation assay. Expression differences of FGFR3-AS1 were analyzed according to grading and staging. FGFR3 protein was detected by western blot assay. Human bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cell lines were transiently transfected with FGFR3-AS1-specific siRNA or negative control siRNA. The cell proliferation changes of transfected bladder cancer cells were determined using CCK-8 assay. Apoptosis caused by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 was evaluated using ELISA assay. Motility changes induced by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 were measured using wound healing assay and transwell assay.

RESULTS:

Both FGFR3-AS1 and FGFR3 were overexpressed in bladder cancer tissues compared to matched normal tissues. They were also positively expressed in bladder cancer. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in high grade tumors than those in low grade tumors. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in invasive tumors than those in non-invasive tumors. Cell proliferation inhibition, increased apoptosis, and decreased motility were observed in FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-transfected T24 and 5637 cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS:

FGFR3-AS1 plays an oncogenic role in human bladder cancer. Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 may provide a potential new therapeutic approach to this disease.

Keywords: lncRNA, FGFR3-AS1, bladder cancer

1. Introduction

As one of the most common malignancies worldwide, urothelial carcinoma of bladder displays a broad histologic spectrum ranging from superficial and well differentiated lesions to invasive and poorly differentiated tumors [1, 2]. High rates of recurrence and progression have prompted investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis and progression in bladder cancer. The genetic and epigenetic changes that contribute to development of bladder cancer are continuing to be identified and it is necessary to identify novel biological targets for bladder cancer [3, 4].

Recently, the studies on long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer progression and metastasis have led to new approaches in treating cancers [5]. As non-protein coding RNA transcripts, lncRNAs are larger than 200 nt in length and can serve as scaffolds or regulators [6, 7] to regulate cellular signaling pathways. They also play critical roles in the programming and regulation of mammalian genome [8]. As a widespread phenomenon, some lncRNAs have function as antisense transcripts and could regulate the expression of sense genes through RNA-RNA interaction [9, 10, 11]. For example, antisense Uchl1 increases Uchl1 translation through an embedded SINEB2 repeat [9]. The dysregulation of lncRNAs is related to many types of human cancer, including FGFR3 antisense transcript 1 (FGFR3-AS1) [12]. FGFR3-AS1 (previous name: lncRNA-BX537709) oriented in antisense direction with respect to FGFR3, and formed a ‘tail-to-tail’ pairing pattern with 1053 nucleotides full complementarity. FGFR3-AS1 increases the expression of its target gene FGFR3, which was previously identified as a potential biomarker for detection of bladder cancer [13, 14]. Somatic point mutations of FGFR3 were significantly associated with low grade/stage in bladder cancer [15]. Genomic alterations of FGFR3, such as translocations and activating mutations, have been found in advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma [16]. It has also been reported that FGFR3 decreases cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, and induces pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic events in bladder cancer [17]. However, the relationship between FGFR3-AS1 and bladder cancer is still unclear.

In this study, our results showed that FGFR3-AS1 was overexpressed in bladder cancer compared to matched normal bladder tissue. The expression levels of FGFR3-AS1 in high grade tumors were higher than those in low grade tumors. FGFR3-AS1 RNAs were more abundant in invasive tumors than those in non-invasive tumors. Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 inhibited bladder cancer cell proliferation, induced apoptosis and decreased cell motility.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Patient samples

Thirty-six patients who diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and received partial or radical cystectomy were included in this study. The bladder cancer tissues and matched histologically normal tissues from patients were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgical operation. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board of Shenzhen 2nd People’s Hospital with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shenzhen 2nd People’s Hospital.

2.2. Cell culture

T24, 5637, UM-UC-3, SW-780 and SV-HUC-1 cell lines were obtained from the Institute of Cell Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. They were grown in minimal essential medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

2.3. Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the tissue samples or cell lines by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the instructions. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA with the RevertAidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Hanover, MD, USA). The primer sequences were as follows: FGFR3-AS1 primers [12] forward: 5-CCACCTCAGGAACCCACAAG-3, rev- erse: 5-GCAGCAGCACCGAAAGTCAC-3; LETM1 primers: 5-AGTTCCTCCAGGACACCATC-3 (forw- ard), 5-TCTGCAGTGTGGACTTGAGC-3 (reverse); TBP primers: 5-CCCGAAACGCCGAATATAATCC-3 (forward), 5-AATCAGTGCCGTGGTTCGTG-3(reverse). PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 20 μl, including 10 μl of 2× All-in-OneTM qPCR Mix (GeneCopoiea Inc, Rockville, MD, USA), 0.4 μl forward primer, 0.4 μl reverse primer, 1 μl First-Strand cDNA, 0.4 μl ROX Reference Dye and 7.8 μl double-distilled water. The reactions were performed and analyzed using the ABI PRISM 7000 Fluorescent Quantitative PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR reactions were performed in triplicate. TBP was used as an internal control. The cycling parameters for PCR were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 10 min at 95C; 40 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 15 s at 95C, 20 s at 55C, and 30 s at 70C. The median in each triplicate was used to calculate relative gene concentration using the comparative ΔCt method (value of 2)-ΔCt(gene-TBP). Expression fold changes were calculated using 2-ΔΔCt methods.

2.4. Western blot assay

Western blotting was performed as described elsewhere [7]. Antibodies specific to FGFR3 and TBP were obtained from Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA.

2.5. siRNA transfection

FGFR3-AS1 siRNAs were synthesized by Geneph- arma Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China. The siRNA sequen- ces [12]: the siRNA-1 sequence was 5-CAGAGGAAA UGAUGGACCCACAGCU-3 and the siRNA-2 sequence was 5-CCCUCCCAUAAACAUUCCUUGCU CU-3. The negative Control siRNA was also purchased from Genepharma Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China. The cell lines were incubated with either FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the protocol.

2.6. Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation was measured using Cell Counting Kit-8, CCK-8 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, shanghai, China) according to protocols. Cells were cultured in a 96-well plate for 24 h and grown in normal medium. Then cells were transfected with FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA. At 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after transfection, 10 μl of CCK-8 (5 mg/ml) was added to each well. The cells were cultured for 1 hour and the OD values were then determined at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The OD values were finally converted to cell numbers using standard curves.

2.7. Cell apoptosis assay

Cell apoptosis was measured by using Caspase 3 ELISA assay kit (R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Bladder cancer cell lines were cultured and transfected with either FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA. 48 hours after transfection, apoptosis caused by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 was measured by analyzing the activity of caspase 3 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to calculate OD values. Data were shown as the ratios between the OD values of FGFR3-AS1 siRNA transfected cells and those of negative control siRNA transfected cells.

2.8. Wound healing assay

Bladder cancer cell lines were cultured and transfected with either FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA. Cells were scratched in the monolayer and cultured in normal condition. The migrated distances were measured at 0, 24 h after scratching for T24 and 5637 cells respectively.

2.9. Transwell assay

About 1 × 105 siRNA-treated cells supplemented with 100 μl serum-free medium were plated into the upper chambers (24-well insert, pore size 8 μm, Corning) containing Matrigel (1:8, 50 μl/well, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) . The lower chambers were added with 500 μl medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were cultured for 48 hours and then cells under the surface of the lower chamber were washed with 1 × PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 25 min, and washed 3 times. Invaded cells were observed under the inverted microscope and imaged. After that, each chamber with the invaded cells was soaked into 1 ml 33% acetic acid for 10 min to wash out the crystal violet. 100 μl of 33% acetic acid were added into each well of 96-well plates, and then the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm by a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.10. Statistical analysis

The FGFR3-AS1 RNA expression differences between bladder cancer tissues and matched normal tissues were analyzed using paired samples t-test. The expression correlation between FGFR3-AS1 and FGFR3 was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The FGFR3-AS1 RNA expression differences between cancer subgroups were analyzed using independent samples t-test. The differences between FGFR3-AS1 siRNA and negative control siRNA transfected cells in the CCK-8 assay were analyzed using independent samples t-test at each time point. Cell apoptosis assays and wound healing assays were analyzed using independent samples t-test. All these statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 19.0 SPSS Inc.). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. FGFR3-AS1 was overexpressed in bladder cancer tissues

The genomic organization of FGFR3-AS1 andFGFR3 was shown in Fig. 1A. The relative expression of FGFR3-AS1 was detected using Real-Time qPCR in a total of 36 patients with bladder cancer. FGFR3-AS1 was overexpressed in bladder cancer compared to matched normal tissue. The FGFR3-AS1 expression fold change (bladder cancer tissue/matched histologically normal tissue) in each patient is indicated in Fig. 1B. The clinical features of this cohort of patients (from No. 1 to No. 36) are provided in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

FGFR3-AS1 was overexpressed in bladder cancer. A. The genomic organization of FGFR3-AS1 and FGFR3. Arrows show transcription direction and blocks indicate exons. B. T represents tumor, N represents normal. The heights of the columns in the chart represent the log2-transformed fold changes (tumor/normal) in FGFR3-AS1 expression in 36 patients. C. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in high grade cancers than those in low grade cancers (**p< 0.01). D. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in invasive cancers than those in non-invasive cancers (**p< 0.01). E. FGFR3 mRNA was overexpressed in most tumor tissues. F. FGFR3 protein was overexpressed in bladder cancer tissues. G. FGFR3-AS1 RNA and FGFR3 mRNA were positively expressed in bladder cancer. H. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were much higher in T24 and 5637 cell lines than in other 3 cell lines. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

Table 1.

Summary of clinicopathological features of tissues of bladder cancer

Pt No. Age Sex Grade Stage Pt No. Age Sex Grade Stage
1 61 M L T1N0M0 19 60 M H T2N0M0
2 51 M H T2N0M0 20 55 M L T2N0M0
3 45 M H T1N0M0 21 59 M H T2N0M0
4 67 M H T2N1M0 22 71 M L T1N0M0
5 63 M H T2N1M0 23 65 F H T3N0M0
6 54 M H T2N0M0 24 58 M H T3N0M0
7 51 F H T3N1M0 25 46 M H T2N0M0
8 56 M H T2N0M0 26 41 M L T1N0M0
9 62 M L T2N0M0 27 46 F L T2N0M0
10 53 M H T2N0M0 28 53 M L T1N0M0
11 48 M H T2N0M0 29 51 M H T2N0M0
12 54 M L T1N0M0 30 50 M L T2N0M0
13 57 M H T3N0M0 31 52 F L T2N0M0
14 44 F L T1N0M0 32 42 M L T2N0M0
15 54 M H T3N0M0 33 59 M H T3N1M0
16 59 M H T3N0M0 34 52 M H T2N0M0
17 62 M H T2N0M0 35 59 F H T3N1M0
18 61 M H T2N0M0 36 52 M L T1N0M0

Pt No.: patient number; M: male; F: female; Grade: the World Health Organization 2004 classification; H: high; L: low; Stage: the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification.

We analyzed expression differences according to grading and staging. FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in high grade tumors than those in low grade tumors. The expression fold change (high/low grade tumor) was 3.18 (Fig. 1C). FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were higher in invasive tumors than those in non-invasive tumors. The expression fold change (invasive/non-invasive tumor) was 2.63 (Fig. 1D).

Because FGFR3-AS1 was reported to increase the expression of its sense gene FGFR3 [12], we then determined the relative expression of FGFR3 mRNA using Real-Time qPCR in the same bladder cancer samples (n= 36). FGFR3 was overexpressed in most bladder cancer tissues. The FGFR3 expression fold change (bladder cancer tissue/matched histologically normal tissue) in each patient is indicated in Fig. 1E. As shown in western blot assay (Fig. 1F), FGFR3 protein was also overexpressed in the tumor tissues compared to the matched normal tissues (n= 6). FGFR3-AS1 RNA and FGFR3 mRNA were also positively expressed in bladder cancer, supporting the activation of FGFR3 by FGFR3-AS1 (Fig. 1G).

We also determined the expression pattern of FGFR3-

AS1 in several well-known bladder cancer cell lines (T24, 5637, UM-UC-3 and SW-780) and one normal urothelial cell line (SV-HUC-1) using Real-Time qPCR. The data showed that FGFR3-AS1 expression levels were much higher in bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cell lines than in other 3 cell lines (Fig. 1H). Therefore, we performed functional experiments in T24 and 5637.

3.2. Specific siRNA down-regulated the expression of FGFR3-AS1

According to the previous reports [12], we have used two different siRNAs (siRNA-1 and siRNA-2) targeting FGFR3-AS1 and tested their efficiencies in bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cells transfected with FGFR3-AS1 siRNAs or negative control siRNA. 48 hours after transfection, the FGFR3-AS1 RNA expression levels were analyzed. Although FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-1 only induced minimal knockdown effects, FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-2 largely reduced FGFR3-AS1 RNA levels in both T24 (Fig. 2A) and 5637 (Fig. 2B) cells. To exclude the possibility that the siRNAs we designed also reduce the expression of LETM1, a gene downstream of FGFR3, we also measured the relative level of LETM1 using qPCR after transfection of these siRNAs. The results confirmed that siRNAs have no influence on LETM1 expression (Fig. 2C). Therefore, we performed functional experiments using FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 expression. T24 and 5637 cells were cultured and transfected with either FGFR3-AS1 siRNAs or negative control siRNA and cultured in normal medium. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were collected. Then the FGFR3-AS1 RNA expression levels in siRNA transfected T24 (A) and 5637 (B) cells or the LETM1 mRNA expression levels in T24 cells (C) were analyzed. C. Data are indicated as mean ± SD. Each experiment in both cell lines was performed in triplicate for three independent times.

3.3. Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 inhibited cell proliferation

Bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cells were transfected with FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA and the cell proliferation changes of bladder cancer cells were determined by CCK-8 assay. Cell proliferation arrest was observed in both T24 cells (Fig. 3A) and 5637 cells after knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 inhibited cell proliferation. Cell proliferation was measured by CCK-8 assay. After transfection of FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA, OD values were measured and converted to cell numbers. Independent t test was used for comparing the differences between FGFR3-AS1 siRNA and negative control siRNA at each time point. A. Cell proliferation inhibition was observed in bladder cancer T24 cells (**p< 0.01). D. Cell proliferation inhibition was observed in bladder cancer 5637 cells (**p< 0.01). Data are shown as mean ± SD. Each experiment in both cell lines was performed in double for three independent times.

3.4. Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 induced apoptosis

Bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cell lines were transfected with FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cell apoptosis changes of bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cells were determined using ELISA analysis (Fig. 4). Induced cell apoptosis was observed in both bladder cancer cell lines after knockdown of FGFR3-AS1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 induced apoptosis. Forty-eight hours after transfection of FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA, the cell apoptosis changes were determined by ELISA. Cell apoptosis induction was observed in FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-transfected bladder cancer T24 (**p< 0.01) and 5637 (**p< 0.01) cells using ELISA. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Each experiment in both cell lines was performed in triplicate for three independent times.

3.5. Motility changes induced by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1

We used wound healing assay to detect cell migration caused by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 in bladder cancer cells. Decreased cell migration was observed in both T24 cells (Fig. 5A and B) and 5637 cells (Fig. 5C and D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 decreased cell migration. After transfection of FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA, wound healing assay was used to detect cell migration in bladder cancer cells. A. Representative images of wound healing assay in T24 cells. B. Decreased cell migration was observed in T24 cells (p< 0.01). C. Representative images of wound healing assay in 5637 cells. D. Decreased cell migration was observed in 5637 cells (p< 0.01). Data are indicated as mean ± SD. Each experiment in both cell lines was performed in triplicate for three independent times.

We also used transwell assay to detect cell invasion. Compared with the negative control group, the cell invasion ability was extremely suppressed in T24 (Fig. 6A and B) cells and 5637 cells (Fig. 6C and D) which were transfected with FGFR3-AS1 siRNA.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 decreased cell invasion. After transfection of FGFR3-AS1 siRNA or negative control siRNA, transwell assay was used to detect cell invasion in bladder cancer cells. A. Representative images of transwell assay in T24 cells. B. Decreased cell invasion was observed in T24 cells (p< 0.01). C. Representative images of transwell assay in 5637 cells. D. Decreased cell invasion was observed in 5637 cells (p< 0.01). Data are indicated as mean ± SD. Each experiment in both cell lines was performed in triplicate for three independent times.

4. Discussion

LncRNAs take participation in nearly all the biological and pathological processes and have been involved in the tumorigenesis, metastasis, or recurrence of bladder cancer. They may serve as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis [18]. Although the reason why lncRNAs were activated in bladder cancer is unclear, it has been believed that lncRNAs are powerful endogenous regulators for specific targets [19, 20]. As a recently discovered lncRNA, several previous works were conducted to characterize the oncogenic properties of FGFR3-AS1 [12, 21]. Inducible knockdown of FGFR3 in human bladder cancer cells arrested cell-cycle progression and markedly prevented tumor progression in xenografted mice, suggesting that FGFR3 is an oncogene [22]. FGFR3 also plays an important role in progression of other cancers and was associated with aggressive tumor behavior [23]. In this study, we found that FGFR3-AS1 was overexpressed in bladder cancer compared to matched normal tissue. High level expression of FGFR3-AS1 was associated with high grade and stage bladder cancers. The differential FGFR3-AS1 expression patterns between bladder cancer and control and the association of FGFR3-AS1 with clinicopathological features suggest that long noncoding RNA FGFR3-AS1 emerges as a novel player in the development and progression of the bladder cancer. Interestingly, the expression of FGFR3-AS1 was positively correlated with FGFR3 in bladder cancer. These results were consistent with the well-known conclusion which indicated that FGFR3-AS1 increases FGFR3 mRNA stability and expression through antisense pairing with 3’UTR of FGFR3 mRNA.

To understand the possible impacts of FGFR3-AS1 on bladder cancer, we determined the cell proliferation inhibition, apoptosis, and motility changes induced by knockdown of FGFR3-AS1 in bladder cancer. Cell proliferation inhibition, increased apoptosis, and decreased motility were observed in FGFR3-AS1 siRNA-transfected bladder cancer T24 and 5637 cell lines. These findings suggest that FGFR3-AS1 may play roles in carcinogenesis via upregulating FGFR3 in bladder cancer. Targeting FGFR3-AS1 or FGFR3 may be a promising approach to the treatment of bladder cancer. More works will be needed to determine the potential molecular mechanism of FGFR3-AS1 in bladder cancer. Therapies designed to target FGFR3-AS1 or FGFR3 are also should under intensive investigation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the donors whose names were not included in the author list, but who participated in this program. This research was supported by Scientific Research Project of Shenzhen Health and Family Planning System (201606019).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  • [1]. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D. and Jemal A., Cancer statistics, CA Cancer J Clin 66(1) (2016), 7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2]. Dobruch J. et al., Gender and bladder cancer: A collaborative review of etiology, biology, and outcomes, European Urology 69(2) (2016), 300–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3]. Du X. et al., MMP-1 and Pro-MMP-10 as potential urinary pharmacodynamic biomarkers of FGFR3-targeted therapy in patients with bladder cancer, Clinical Cancer Research 20(24) (2014), 6324–6335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4]. Wang C. et al., Targeted p53 activation by saRNA suppresses human bladder cancer cells growth and metastasis, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 35(1) (2016), 53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. Hu W. et al., Tumor heterogeneity uncovered by dynamic expression of long noncoding RNA at single-cell resolution, Cancer Genetics 208(12) (2015), 581–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6]. Jiang X. et al., Increased level of H19 long noncoding RNA promotes invasion, angiogenesis, and stemness of glioblastoma cells, Journal of Neurosurgery 124(1) (2016), 129–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7]. Liu Y. et al., Directing cellular information flow via CRISPR signal conductors, Nat Methods 13(11) (2016), 938–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8]. Chen D. et al., Genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) expression in colorectal cancer tissues from patients with liver metastasis, Cancer Medicine 5(7) (2016), 1629–1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9]. Carrieri C. et al., Long non-coding antisense RNA controls Uchl1translation through an embedded SINEB2 repeat, Nature 491(7424) (2012), 454–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10]. Mahmoudi S. et al., Wrap53, a natural p53 antisense transcript required for p53 induction upon DNA damage, Mol Cell 33(4) (2009), 462–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11]. Su W. et al., Bidirectional regulation between WDR83 and its natural antisense transcript DHPS in gastric cancer, Cell Res 22(9) (2012), 1374–1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12]. Sun J. et al., Long noncoding RNA FGFR3-AS1 promotes osteosarcoma growth through regulating its natural antisense transcript FGFR3, Molecular Biology Reports 43(5) (2016), 427–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. Du X. et al., MMP-1 and Pro-MMP-10 as potential urinary pharmacodynamic biomarkers of FGFR3-targeted therapy in patients with bladder cancer, Clinical Cancer Research 20(24) (2014), 6324–6335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Blanca A. et al., FGFR3 and Cyclin D3 as urine biomarkers of bladder cancer recurrence, Biomarkers 10(3) (2016), 243–253. [Google Scholar]
  • [15]. Pandith A.A. et al., Oncogenic Activation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-3 and RAS Genes as Non-Overlapping Mutu al Exclusive Events in Urinary Bladder Cancer, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 17(6) (2016), 2787–2793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16]. Sethakorn N. and O’Donnell P.H., Spectrum of genomic alterations in FGFR3: Current appraisal of the potential role of FGFR3 in advanced urothelial carcinoma, BJU Int 118(5) (2016), 681–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. Pandith A.A., Shah Z.A. and Siddiqi M.A., Oncogenic role of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in tumorigenesis of urinary bladder cancer, in: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Elsevier, 31(4) (2013), 398–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18]. Chen T. et al., Expression of long noncoding RNA lncRNA-n336928 is correlated with tumor stage and grade and overall survival in bladder cancer, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 468(4) (2015), 666–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19]. Guo G. et al., A long noncoding RNA critically regulates Bcr-Abl-mediated cellular transformation by acting as a competitive endogenous RNA, Oncogene 34(14) (2015), 1768–1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20]. Hung C.L. et al., A long noncoding RNA connects c-Myc to tumor metabolism, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(52) (2014), 18697–18702. [Google Scholar]
  • [21]. Li J.P. et al., Microarray expression profile of long noncoding RNAs in human osteosarcoma, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 433(2) (2013), 200–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. Qing J. et al., Antibody-based targeting of FGFR3 in bladder carcinoma and t (4; 14)-positive multiple myeloma in mice, The Journal of Clinical Investigation 119(5) (2009), 1216–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. Jiang H. et al., miR-99a promotes proliferation targeting FGFR 3 in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 68(2) (2014), 163–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Biomarkers: Section A of Disease Markers are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES