Abstract
We describe new methodology for the evaluation of the labor experience and preliminary findings using these methods. The effects of feedback from an Electronic Fetal Monitor on report of contraction onset were evaluated during the labors of eight primiparous women, four of whom had attended childbirth preparation classes. Using a within-subject reversal design, data were gathered across four phases for each woman: no feedback (monitor turned away from mother and coach), feedback, no feedback, and feedback again. The women were observed in early labor without medication. Six women were able to note the onset of contractions earlier with the availability of feedback; two women (who had not attended childbirth preparation classes) were more variable in their response. Threshold for recognition of pain onset did not change reliably. Seven of the eight women chose to continue monitoring when offered the chance to discontinue it. These results suggest that the technological advance of fetal monitoring can be used in cooperation with prepared childbirth techniques to facilitate earlier recognition of contraction onset, allowing increased preparation for contractions. Further experimental evaluations during labor are suggested.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Averill J. R., Rosenn M. Vigilant and nonvigilant coping strategies and pscyhophysiological stress reactions during the anticipation of electric shock. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Jul;23(1):128–141. doi: 10.1037/h0032758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haverkamp A. D., Thompson H. E., McFee J. G., Cetrulo C. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jun 1;125(3):310–320. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurst M., Summey P. S. Electronic fetal monitoring. Health PAC Bull. 1979;(83-85):20–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller S. M. Coping with impending stress: psychophysiological and cognitive correlates of choice. Psychophysiology. 1979 Nov;16(6):572–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shields D. Fetal and maternal monitoring: maternal reactions to fetal monitoring. Am J Nurs. 1978 Dec;78(12):2110–2112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starkman M. N. Fetal monitoring: psychologic consequences and management recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Oct;50(4):500–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starkman M. N. Psychological responses to the use of the fetal monitor during labor. Psychosom Med. 1976 Jul-Aug;38(4):269–277. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197607000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens R. J., Heide F. Analgesic characteristics of prepared childbirth techniques: attention focusing and systematic relaxation. J Psychosom Res. 1977;21(6):429–438. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(77)90065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stone C. I., Demchik-Stome D. A., Horan J. J. Coping with pain: a component analysis of Lamaze and cognitive-behavioral procedures. J Psychosom Res. 1977;21(6):451–456. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(77)90067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Worthington E. L., Jr, Martin G. A. A laboratory analysis of response to pain after training three Lamaze techniques. J Psychosom Res. 1980;24(2):109–116. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(80)90060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]