Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1984 Summer;17(2):273–278. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-273

The effects of single instance, multiple instance, and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students.

J R Sprague, R H Horner
PMCID: PMC1307940  PMID: 6735957

Abstract

This report provides an experimental analysis of generalized vending machine use by six moderately or severely retarded high school students. Dependent variables were training trials to criterion and performance on 10 nontrained "generalization" vending machines. A multiple-baseline design across subjects was used to compare three strategies for teaching generalized vending machine use. Training occurred with (a) a single vending machine, (b) three similar machines, or (c) three machines that sampled the range of stimulus and response variation in a defined class of vending machines. Results indicated that the third approach was the most effective method of obtaining generalized responding. Methodological implications for the experimental analysis of generalization and programmatic implications for teaching generalized behaviors are discussed.

Full text

PDF
273

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Honig W. K., Urcuioli P. J. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405–445. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Neef N. A., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Public transportation training: in vivo versus classroom instruction. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Fall;11(3):331–344. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. REYNOLDS G. S. Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:203–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Reynolds W. M. Measurement of personal competence of mentally retarded individuals. Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Jan;85(4):368–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sanders M. R., James J. E. The modification of parent behavior. A review of generalization and maintenance. Behav Modif. 1983 Jan;7(1):3–27. doi: 10.1177/01454455830071001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES