Abstract
We evaluated the effects of adding a social support component to a worksite controlled smoking treatment program. Twenty-four participants were randomly assigned to either a controlled smoking or a controlled smoking plus partner support condition. Within a multiple baseline across behaviors design, smokers in both conditions made efforts to achieve sequential 50% reductions in: nicotine content of brand smoked, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and percentage of each cigarette smoked. Self-monitoring records, laboratory analyses of spent cigarette butts, and carbon monoxide determinations indicated that both conditions were effective in producing significant reductions in each of the three target behaviors and in carbon monoxide levels. All participants who quit smoking during the program maintained their abstinence at a 6-month follow-up, and those who did not quit were smoking less at follow-up than they had at pretest on all dependent variables. However, few differences were observed between controlled smoking and controlled smoking plus partner support conditions either during treatment or at the 6-month follow-up. Results are discussed with regard to previous worksite studies, future directions for research on social support, and variables that may have mediated treatment outcome.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d322/3d3229f6291bd0495fc7e2fd1ec3369b34742db2" alt="485"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9eed/d9eed7641d6249a104146bc29637bbf0a8234d1d" alt="486"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05827/058272ed26371b5f169d3ae3c229efc294427058" alt="487"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5add9/5add9f94629d03ca5f94b4a5f57b5d3c55c28a52" alt="488"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b561/1b561cc8bd76ff65ffe25a74b3b732f796c682a2" alt="489"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609d8/609d89769e0236071adfa452b79ac3664062c545" alt="490"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15ebb/15ebb2694ef460d2f036faae35e14ec4ad508c93" alt="491"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2a4f/e2a4fa2e78059b06f3407752ddcb66b123e9b295" alt="492"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f85/61f85cce09d2d1130e2d65b236c779e72364609d" alt="493"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60e6a/60e6a656b83bc23273e513e3a7ae37d2c900118c" alt="494"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68850/688501e7879b3f821213f6d6b75caf11e1b1a4b9" alt="495"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brownell K. D., Heckerman C. L., Westlake R. J., Hayes S. C., Monti P. M. The effect of couples training and partner co-operativeness in the behavioral treatment of obesity. Behav Res Ther. 1978;16(5):323–333. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(78)90002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brownell K. D. Obesity: understanding and treating a serious, prevalent, and refractory disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Dec;50(6):820–840. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.6.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fagerström K. O. Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav. 1978;3(3-4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(78)90024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fielding J. E. Effectiveness of employee health improvement programs. J Occup Med. 1982 Nov;24(11):907–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasgow R. E., Klesges R. C., Godding P. R., Vasey M. W., O'Neill H. K. Evaluation of a worksite-controlled smoking program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Feb;52(1):137–138. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasgow R. E., Klesges R. C., Vasey M. W. Controlled smoking for chronic smokers: an extension and replication. Addict Behav. 1983;8(2):143–150. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(83)90008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton S. B., Bornstein P. H. Broad-spectrum behavioral approach to smoking cessation: effects of social support and paraprofessional training on the maintenance of treatment effects. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979 Jun;47(3):598–600. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.47.3.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janis I. L., Hoffman D. Facilitating effects of daily contact between partners who make a decision to cut down on smoking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971 Jan;17(1):25–35. doi: 10.1037/h0030468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janis I. L. The role of social support in adherence to stressful decisions. Am Psychol. 1983 Feb;38(2):143–160. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.38.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanzler M., Zeidenberg P., Jaffe J. H. Response of medical personnel to an on-site smoking cessation program. J Clin Psychol. 1976 Jul;32(3):670–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leventhal H., Cleary P. D. The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification. Psychol Bull. 1980 Sep;88(2):370–405. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichtenstein E. The smoking problem: a behavioral perspective. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Dec;50(6):804–819. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.6.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mermelstein R., Lichtenstein E., McIntyre K. Partner support and relapse in smoking-cessation programs. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):465–466. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orleans C. S., Shipley R. H. Worksite smoking cessation initiatives: review and recommendations. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiffman S. Relapse following smoking cessation: a situational analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;50(1):71–86. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]