Abstract
Many experimenters and practitioners regard eye contact between instructor and learner as a facilitator, if not a prerequisite, to the effective instruction of sighted people. Without scientifically supporting the practice of demanding eye contact, experimenters, nonetheless, advocate its use and offer a variety of procedures to promote its acquisition. To justify the widespread use of demanded eye contact and to explain its role functionally, one experiment and data from six replications with nine subjects are presented. The primary experiment provides an empirical base for the training of eye contact prior to instruction. In a multiple-baseline design across two students demanded eye contact resulted in levels of compliance that were double and triple those of baseline. A tentative functional analysis of demanded eye contact is presented, followed by a discussion of the relationship of eye contact to attending.
Keywords: eye contact, compliance, antecedent event
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Foxx R. M. Attention training: the use of overcorrection avoidance to increase the eye contact of autistic and retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):489–499. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOMME L. E., DEBACA P. C., DEVINE J. V., STEINHORST R., RICKERT E. J. USE OF THE PREMACK PRINCIPLE IN CONTROLLING THE BEHAVIOR OF NURSERY SCHOOL CHILDREN. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:544–544. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris S. L. Teaching language to nonverbal children--with emphasis on problems of generalization. Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):565–580. doi: 10.1037/h0076903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovaas O. I., Berberich J. P., Perloff B. F., Schaeffer B. Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children. Science. 1966 Feb 11;151(3711):705–707. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3711.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neef N. A., Shafer M. S., Egel A. L., Cataldo M. F., Parrish J. M. The class specific effects of compliance training with "do" and "don't" requests: analogue analysis and classroom application. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;16(1):81–99. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nordquist V. M., Wahler R. G. Naturalistic treatment of an autistic child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):79–87. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Risley T., Wolf M. Establishing functional speech in echolalic children. Behav Res Ther. 1967 May;5(2):73–88. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte R. C., Hopkins B. L. The effects of teacher attention on following instructions in a kindergarten class. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Summer;3(2):117–122. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman E. H., Zimmerman J., Russell C. D. Differential effects of token reinforcement on instruction-following behavior in retarded students instructed as a group. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):101–112. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]