Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1985 Spring;18(1):45–59. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-45

Clinical behavioral pharmacology: methods for evaluating medications and contingency management.

L D Burgio, T J Page, R M Capriotti
PMCID: PMC1307986  PMID: 3997697

Abstract

We evaluated methods for comparing the effects of dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine), thioridazine (Mellaril), and contingency management in the control of severe behavior problems. A reversal design was used in which medications were systematically titrated and assessed in unstructured as well as structured settings with three clients. Subsequently, behavioral procedures including timeout, differential reinforcement of other behavior, and visual screening, were used in a multiple-baseline design across settings. The assessment and design methods were useful in comparing the interventions. Dextroamphetamine decreased inappropriate behaviors and improved academic behaviors in one client, but no reliable effects were observed in the other two clients. Thioridazine was variable across clients, settings, behaviors, and dosages. Contingency management produced consistent decreases in inappropriate behaviors and small improvements in academic performance.

Full text

PDF
45

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aman M. G., Singh N. N. The usefulness of thioridazine for treating childhood disorders--fact or folklore? Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Jan;84(4):331–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayllon T., Layman D., Kandel H. J. A behavioral-educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Summer;8(2):137–146. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer D. M. "Perhaps it would be better not to know everything.". J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):167–172. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bijou S. W., Peterson R. F., Ault M. H. A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):175–191. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen D. E. Effects of combining methylphenidate and a classroom token system in modifying hyperactive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Nov;80(3):266–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craig T. J., Behar R. Trends in the prescription of psychotropic drugs (1970-1977) in a state hospital. Compr Psychiatry. 1980 Sep-Oct;21(5):336–345. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(80)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis K. V., Sprague R. L., Werry J. S. Stereotyped behavior and activity level in severe retardates: the effect of drugs. Am J Ment Defic. 1969 Mar;73(5):721–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis K. V. The effect of drugs on stereotyped and nonstereotyped operant behaviors in retardates. Psychopharmacologia. 1971;22(2):195–213. doi: 10.1007/BF00403628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marholin D., 2nd, Phillips D. Methodological issues in psychopharmacological research: chlorpromazine--a case in point. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1976 Jul;46(3):477–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1976.tb00948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marholin D., 2nd, Touchette P. E., Stewart R. M. Withdrawal of chronic chlorpromazine medication: an experimental analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):159–171. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rapport M. D., Murphy H. A., Bailey J. S. Ritalin vs. response cost in the control of hyperactive children: a within-subject comparison. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Summer;15(2):205–216. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shafto F., Sulzbacher S. Comparing treatment tactics with a hyperactive preschool child: stimulant medication and programmed teacher intervention. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):13–20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sprague R. L., Barnes K. R., Werry J. S. Methylphenidate and thioridazine: learning, reaction time, activity, and classroom behavior in disturbed children. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1970 Jul;40(4):615–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1970.tb00719.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. St Omer V. S. Direct measurement of psychopharmacologic response: effects of chlorpromazine on motor behavior of retarded children. Am J Ment Defic. 1972 Jan;76(4):397–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wulbert M., Dries R. The relative efficacy of methylphenidate (ritalin) and behavior-modification techniques in the treatment of a hyperactive child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):21–31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wysocki T., Fuqua W., Davis V. J., Breuning S. E. Effects of thioridazine (Mellaril) on titrating delayed matching-to-sample performance of mentally retarded adults. Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Mar;85(5):539–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES