Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249

Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

G M Pace, M T Ivancic, G L Edwards, B A Iwata, T J Page
PMCID: PMC1308015  PMID: 4044458

Abstract

We evaluated a procedure for identifying potential reinforcers with profoundly retarded individuals. In Experiment 1, six persons were repeatedly exposed to 16 stimuli, and approach behaviors to each stimulus were used to identify preferred and nonpreferred stimuli. In Experiment 2, we examined the reinforcing properties of preferred and nonpreferred stimuli by delivering them contingently on the occurrence of arbitrarily selected responses. Results revealed that the preferred stimulus conditions typically produced higher rates of responding than did either the baseline or the nonpreferred stimulus conditions, suggesting that the procedure can be used to assess reinforcer value for individuals with limited behavioral repertoires.

Full text

PDF
249

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARRETT B. H. Reduction in rate of multiple tics by free operant conditioning methods. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1962 Sep;135:187–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egel A. L. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):345–350. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Favell J. E., Cannon P. R. Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons. Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Jan;81(4):357–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrari M., Harris S. L. The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):339–343. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Repp A. C., Barton L. E., Brulle A. R. A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):435–445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rincover A., Newsom C. D., Lovaas O. I., Koegel R. L. Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1977 Oct;24(2):312–323. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(77)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES