Abstract
Two stimulus control processes by which some parent-child dyads occasionally escalate their aversive exchanges into progressively more coercive interactions are described. The compliance hypothesis suggests that aversive actions have instructional properties for the dyad and that parent compliance with such child instructions maintains behavior chains of increasing aversiveness. The predictability hypothesis suggests that social interactions are most likely to function as aversive stimuli in the dyad when delivered in unpredictable fashion by either party and that responses instrumental in reducing dyadic unpredictability maintain aversive behavior chains. Expectations derived from both hypotheses are evaluated in a series of correlational analyses of mother-child interactions obtained in extended baseline observations of three dyads seeking psychological help for severe interactional problems. Results provide tentative support for the predictability hypothesis and suggest important avenues of further research.
Full text
PDF









Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burgess R. L., Conger R. D. Family interaction in abusive, neglectful, and normal families. Child Dev. 1978 Dec;49(4):1163–1173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumas J. E., Wahler R. G. Indiscriminate mothering as a contextual factor in aggressive-oppositional child behavior: "damned if you do and damned if you don't". J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1985 Mar;13(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00918368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein S., Roupenian A. Heart rate and skin conductance during experimentally induced anxiety: the effect of uncertainty about receiving a noxious stimulus. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Sep;16(1):20–28. doi: 10.1037/h0029786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George C., Main M. Social interactions of young abused children: approach, avoidance, and aggression. Child Dev. 1979 Jun;50(2):306–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann D. P. Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):103–116. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D. O., Shanok S. S., Pincus J. H., Glaser G. H. Violent juvenile delinquents: psychiatric, neurological, psychological, and abuse factors. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1979 Spring;18(2):307–319. doi: 10.1016/s0002-7138(09)61045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snyder J. J. Reinforcement analysis of interaction in problem and nonproblem families. J Abnorm Psychol. 1977 Oct;86(5):528–535. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.86.5.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Staub E., Tursky B., Schwartz G. E. Self-control and predictability: their effects on reactions to aversive stimulation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971 May;18(2):157–162. doi: 10.1037/h0030851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
