Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1980 Spring;13(1):153–158. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-153

The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention.

N A Neef, B A Iwata, T J Page
PMCID: PMC1308115  PMID: 7364694

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of interspersing known items during spelling instruction on new words for three mentally retarded students. Following a baseline consisting of the presentation of 10 test words per session, a multielement design was implemented. During interspersal training sessions, previously mastered words were presented alternately with each of 10 test words. During high-density reinforcement sessions, 10 test words were presented and additional reinforcement was provided for task-related behaviors. Throughout all conditions, test words were deleted and replaced after meeting a mastery criterion. Periodic retention tests were administered over mastered words and a cumulative retention test was administered at the end of the experiment. Results showed that high-density reinforcement did facilitate performance over baseline; however, intersperal training was superior to the other conditions in terms of both acquisition rate and short- and long-term retention. In addition, students preferred the interspersal condition when offered a choice.

Full text

PDF
153

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brigham T. A., Sherman J. A. An experimental analysis of verbal imitation in preschool children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):151–158. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr E. G., Binkoff J. A., Kologinsky E., Eddy M. Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labelling. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Winter;11(4):489–501. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frisch S. A., Schumaker J. B. Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):611–621. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kircher A. S., Pear J. J., Martin G. L. Shock as punishment in a picture-naming task with retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):227–233. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovaas O. I., Berberich J. P., Perloff B. F., Schaeffer B. Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children. Science. 1966 Feb 11;151(3711):705–707. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3711.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peterson R. F. Some experiments on the organization of a class of imitative behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):225–235. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schumaker J., Sherman J. A. Training generative verb usage by imitation and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):273–287. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES