Abstract
Two studies evaluated the effects of a group contingency on electricity conservation. In Study 1, residents of 166 apartment units in three towers held meetings and received biweekly payments of the value of electricity saved compared to predicted use. The group contingencies were initiated in each tower in a multiple-baseline design. The program produced substantial savings in one tower (11.2% of temperature-adjusted baseline), moderate savings in another (4.0%), and minimal savings in a third (1.7%). Overall, the residents saved 6.2%. In Study 2, residents of 255 apartment units, also in three towers, received the same treatment, except only 50% of the value of their savings were paid, and they received a one-time bonus of $5 for using ≥ 10% less than baseline. Towers in Study 2 showed savings of 9.5%, 4.7%, and 8.3%, an average of 6.9%.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Hayes S. C., Cone J. D. Reducing residential electrical energy use: payments, information, and feedback. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):425–435. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohlenberg R., Phillips T., Proctor W. A behavioral analysis of peaking in residential electrical-energy consumers. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):13–18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Litoe L., Pumroy D. K. A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Fall;8(3):341–347. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winett R. A., Neale M. S., Grier H. C. Effects of self-monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):173–184. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]