Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1981 Winter;14(4):449–463. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-449

Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students.

M Weeks, R Gaylord-Ross
PMCID: PMC1308233  PMID: 7328069

Abstract

The influence of task difficulty on aberrant behavior was investigated with three severely handicapped students. Noticeably higher rates of problem behavior occurred in demand compared to no-demand conditions. In addition, there were higher rates of problem behaviors on difficult versus easy tasks. Both these findings were validated with visual discrimination and perceptual motor tasks. An errorless learning procedure effectively minimized errors and aberrant behavior in visual discrimination tasks but not in perceptual motor tasks. It was conceptualized that aberrant behavior was maintained by negative reinforcement contingencies. Difficult tasks were aversive to the children, who emitted aberrant responses to escape or avoid such tasks. By contrast, conditions in which no demands were made, easy tasks, and, in visual discrimination learning, errorless tasks, were less aversive and resulted in little or no problem behavior. Implications for reducing maladaptive behaviors through curricular modifications are discussed and contrasted to more traditional consequence manipulation approaches.

Full text

PDF
449

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azrin N. H., Gottlieb L., Hughart L., Wesolowski M. D., Rahn T. Eliminating self-injurious behavior by educative procedures. Behav Res Ther. 1975 Jun;13(2-3):101–111. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(75)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azrin N. H., Schaeffer R. M., Wesolowski M. D. A rapid method of teaching profoundly retarded persons to dress by a reinforcement - guidance method. Ment Retard. 1976 Dec;14(6):29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman J. A. Self-injurious behavior: a behavioral analysis. J Abnorm Psychol. 1972 Dec;80(3):211–224. doi: 10.1037/h0033736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks P. H., Baumeister A. A. A plea for consideration of ecological validity in the experimental psychology of mental retardation: a guest editorial. Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Mar;81(5):407–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr E. G., Newsom C. D., Binkoff J. A. Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;13(1):101–117. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carr E. G., Newsom C. D., Binkoff J. A. Stimulus control of self-destructive behavior in a psychotic child. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(2):139–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00916518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carr E. G. The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses. Psychol Bull. 1977 Jul;84(4):800–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fellows B. J. Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychol Bull. 1967 Feb;67(2):87–92. doi: 10.1037/h0024098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GIBSON E. J., GIBSON J. J., PICK A. D., OSSER H. A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Dec;55:897–906. doi: 10.1037/h0043190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koegel R. L., Egel A. L. Motivating autistic children. J Abnorm Psychol. 1979 Aug;88(4):418–426. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.88.4.418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lambert J. L. Extinction by retarded children following discrimination learning with and without errors. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Nov;80(3):286–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lovaas O. I., Simmons J. Q. Manipulation of self-destruction in three retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Fall;2(3):143–157. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lutzker J. R. Reducing self-injurious behavior by facial screening. Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Mar;82(5):510–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Plummer S., Baer D. M., LeBlanc J. M. Functional considerations in the use of procedural timeout and in effective alternative. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):689–705. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sailor W., Guess D., Rutherford G., Baer D. M. Control of tantrum behavior by operant techniques during experimental verbal training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):237–243. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith J., Kaufman H., Dutch S., Frost R. Identification by retarded and nonretarded children of stimuli varying along one, two, or three dimensions. Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Sep;80(2):191–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanner B. A., Zeiler M. Punishment of self-injurious behavior using aromatic ammonia as the aversive stimulus. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Spring;8(1):53–57. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Touchette P. E. The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):39–48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES