Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2002 Jun;40(6):2228–2230. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2228-2230.2002

In Vitro Activity of Caspofungin (MK-0991) against Candida albicans Clinical Isolates Displaying Different Mechanisms of Azole Resistance

Stefano P Bachmann 1, Thomas F Patterson 1, José L López-Ribot 1,*
PMCID: PMC130826  PMID: 12037093

Abstract

Caspofungin inhibits the synthesis of 1,3-β-d-glucan, a key step in fungal cell wall biosynthesis. Here we report on its potent in vitro activity (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited = 1 μg per ml of RPMI medium) against 32 Candida albicans fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates irrespective of the underlying resistance mechanism (alterations in ERG11 and/or upregulation of MDR and CDR genes encoding efflux pumps) and provide further evidence that caspofungin is not a substrate for multidrug transporters.


The increase in occurrence of fungal infections, their changing epidemiology, the emergence of resistance, and the toxicity displayed by some of the presently used antifungal therapies have resulted in the need for an expanded arsenal of antifungal drugs. Antifungal agents at different stages in the development pipeline include new-generation azole derivatives and echinocandins. Azole agents target ergosterol biosynthesis, whereas echinocandins represent a new class of antifungal agents that act by inhibiting synthesis of 1,3-β-d-glucan, a key step in fungal cell wall biosynthesis (2). Because of their different mode of action and molecular structure, it is unlikely that cross-resistance between azole antifungal agents (targeting ergosterol synthesis) and echinocandins occurs. Thus, echinocandins, which are fungicidal against yeasts and have a different mode of action, may constitute effective prophylactic and therapeutic options for the management of a variety of fungal infections, including those that are refractory to azoles. Caspofungin acetate (Cancidas, formerly reported as MK-0991 and L-743,872) is a water-soluble, potent echinocandin with activity against a number of clinically important fungi (2).

Fluconazole has proven effective in treating mucosal candidiasis even in individuals with advanced immunodeficiency. However, resistance to fluconazole and other azole antifungal drugs has become an important clinical problem in the management of candidiasis. Mechanisms of azole resistance are multifactorial and include alterations in the target enzyme (lanosterol demethylase, encoded by the ERG11 gene), including overexpression and point mutations and increased extrusion of drug mediated by two types of multidrug efflux transporters, the ABC transporters (encoded by CDR genes) and the major facilitators (encoded by MDR genes) (12). Due to the different mechanisms of action, alterations in the lanosterol demethylase are unlikely to affect susceptibility to caspofungin. However, multidrug efflux pumps display affinity for a wide variety of compounds (including different types of antifungals), and thus the possibility exists that their overexpression may affect susceptibility to caspofungin. Previous studies have demonstrated that caspofungin is highly active against Candida species, including some azole-resistant isolates (1, 3, 11), but the molecular mechanisms responsible for azole resistance in these isolates were not known.

(This work was partially presented at the 40th Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy held in Toronto, Canada, September 2000.)

The Candida albicans clinical isolates included in this study have been described before (8). Briefly, they were obtained by direct swab or by oral saline rinses from 12 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with recurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis enrolled in a longitudinal study to assess the significance of fluconazole resistance (Table 1). The identity of the isolates as C. albicans was confirmed by standard biochemical and microbiological procedures (7). Initial susceptibility testing against fluconazole was performed following NCCLS broth macrodilution methodology (5). For each patient, matched sets (as determined by DNA-typing methods) of fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant (MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml) C. albicans isolates were included in this study. The molecular mechanisms responsible for azole resistance in this series of isolates have been previously reported (8). Briefly, a Northern blot technique was used to study levels of expression of ERG11 (encoding lanosterol demethylase, the target enzyme for azole derivatives) and MDR1 and CDR genes (encoding efflux pumps) implicated in the development of azole resistance. We also obtained the nucleotide sequences of ERG11 genes from all isolates after PCR amplification from genomic DNA. Sequence data were compared to a published ERG11 sequence in search of nucleotide changes resulting in amino acid substitutions affecting the affinity of the enzyme for azole derivatives. Fluconazole MICs and a summary of the molecular resistance mechanisms detected for each of the different isolates are included in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

C. albicans isolates included in this studya

Pt Isolateb Fluconazole MICc Mechanism(s) of resistanced Caspofungin MICsc obtained with the following medium:
RPMI 1640 AM3
7 412S <0.125/0.5 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
2307R 16/>64 ERG11 and CDR 0.25/1 <0.015/<0.015
9 1002S 0.25/0.25 0.25/1 <0.015/<0.015
2823R >64/>64 ERG11 and MDR1 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
3795R >64/>64 ERG11 0.25/1 <0.015/<0.015
14 580S 1/4 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
2440R 32/64 ERG11 and MDR1 0.5/05 <0.015/<0.015
2500R 32/64 ERG11 and MDR1 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
15 945S 4/8 D116E and G450E 1/2 <0.015/<0.015
1619R 32/64 D116E, G450E, and G307S, ERG11 1/1 <0.015/<0.015
16 3107S 2/4 Y132F 0.5/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
3119R 64/>64 Y132F, MDR1 0.5/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
3120R 32/>64 Y132F, MDR1 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
3184R 64/64 Y132F, CDR 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
3281R 32/64 Y132F, CDR 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
28 5044S 4/4 D446N 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
5052R 32/64 D446N, MDR1 and CDR 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
30 5106S 4/8 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
5108R 32/64 G464S, ERG11, MDR1, and CDR 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
42 1691S 0.25/0.25 0.25/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
3731R >64/>64 F126L and K143R, MDR1 0.25/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
3733R 64/64 F126L and K143R, MDR1 0.25/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
43 1649S 0.25/0.5 0.5/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
3034R >64/>64 MDR1 and CDR 0.5/1 <0.015/<0.015
51 2274SDD 16/16 S405F 0.5/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
2257R 32/64 S405F 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.03
2339R 16/64 S405F, CDR 0.25/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
59 3917S 2/4 F449S 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
4617R 32/64 F449S and T229A, MDR1 and CDR 0.25/0.25 <0.015/0.03
4639R 64/>64 F449S and T229A 0.25/0.25 <0.015/<0.015
64 4018S 1/4 0.25/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
4380R 32/64 CDR 0.5/0.5 <0.015/<0.015
a

Serial isolates (matched susceptible and resistant) of C. albicans from patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Pt, patient.

b

Letters in isolate designations signify the following: S, susceptible; SDD, susceptible (dose dependent); R, resistant.

c

Values are in micrograms per milliliter. Two MIC values are given for each isolate: the value to the left of the shill is the value obtained after 24 h of incubation and the value to the right of the shill is the value obtained after 48 h of incubation.

d

Underlying mechanism(s) (i.e., amino acid substitutions in Erg11p and/or genes subject to upregulation) responsible for azole resistance. Only amino acid substitutions with a demonstrated effect on azole resistance are listed. See reference 8 for a detailed analysis of molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in this series of isolates.

Testing of antifungal susceptibility to caspofungin was determined following NCCLS procedures using a broth microdilution method (5). Caspofungin was provided by Merck Research Laboratories (Rahway, N.J.) as a standard powder and was tested at final concentrations of 0.015 to 16 μg/ml. Both the reference RPMI 1640 and Antibiotic Medium 3 with 2% glucose (AM3) were used as test media. We used the spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation corresponding to a concentration of 0.5 × 103 to 2.5 × 103 cells per ml for each of the isolates prepared in the test medium. Yeast inocula (100 μl) were added to each well of microdilution trays containing 100 μl of antifungal drug solution (prepared at twice the final concentration). MICs were read visually as the lowest concentration at which complete growth inhibition was observed after both 24 and 48 h of incubation.

The results of the MIC readings for caspofungin against C. albicans fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates are shown in Table 1. When RPMI 1640 was used as the test medium, the caspofungin MICs measured at 24 h ranged from 0.25 to 1 μg/ml; 48-h readings ranged from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml. The caspofungin MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited at 24 and 48 h were 0.5 and 1 μg/ml, respectively, and these values were the same for both azole-susceptible and -resistant isolates. With AM3, the MICs were all < 0.015 μg/ml at 24 h and ranged from < 0.015 to 0.03 μg/ml at 48 h. Again, caspofungin was equally active against fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant isolates (the MIC at which 90% of isolates tested were inhibited was < 0.015 μg/ml at both 24 and 48 h) when tested using AM3. Our results confirmed previously published data showing remarkably lower MICs of caspofungin when AM3 instead of RPMI 1640 was used for the assay (6). The reason for this finding is still not clear. Although interpretative criteria have not yet been defined for caspofungin, the MICs obtained here were in the range of recently reported achievable levels of caspofungin in serum in humans that are approximately 1 μg/ml for a 50-mg caspofungin daily dose (J. A. Stone, J. B. McCrea, P. J. Wickersham, S. D. Holland, P. J. Deutsch, S. Bi, T. Cicero, H. Greenberg, and S. A. Waldman, Abstr. 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 854, p. 26, 2000) and thus should be considered susceptible.

To further assess the potential role of multidrug efflux pumps in the susceptibility to caspofungin, we also performed susceptibility testing of the parental strain C. albicans SC5314 and the following mutants with knockouts in genes encoding multidrug efflux pumps: DS 448 (Δcdr1), DS 653 (Δcdr2), DS 465 (Δmdr1), DS 654 (Δcdr1/cdr2), and DS 468 (Δcdr1/mdr1). These strains were a kind gift from D. Sanglard (9, 10). The caspofungin susceptibility profiles of all multidrug transporter mutants tested were unchanged from that of strain SC5314. This was in contrast to their susceptibility to fluconazole, for which these mutants have been shown to be hypersusceptible (9, 10), and in our assay they demonstrated up to a three- or twofold-dilution decrease in fluconazole MICs compared to their parental strain. These strains were tested only against caspofungin in RPMI medium. At 24 h, the caspofungin MICs were between 0.5 and 1 μg/ml, whereas at 48 h, all MICs were the same, 1 μg/ml.

Azoles target ergosterol synthesis by blocking lanosterol demethylase, an enzyme that is encoded by the ERG11 gene. Caspofungin, on the other hand, affects fungal cell wall synthesis by inhibiting the production of 1,3-β-d-glucan (2). It is therefore unlikely that cross-resistance between these two classes of antifungals could be explained by an overexpression of ERG11 or a point mutation within the ERG11 gene. Our results supported this theory. It was not yet clear if overexpression of genes encoding efflux pumps, like CDR or the fluconazole-specific MDR1, could affect susceptibility to caspofungin. Our clinical isolates demonstrated low-stable caspofungin MICs, independent of fluconazole resistance and overexpression of genes encoding these efflux pumps. Thus, these results are indicative that caspofungin is not likely to be a substrate for these types of transporters. The observation that a series of multidrug transporter mutants did not exhibit a hypersusceptible phenotype against caspofungin compared to their parental strain corroborated that caspofungin is not a substrate for these pumps that have been widely implicated in resistance to different classes of antifungal drugs and other compounds. Of note, it has been previously shown that the majority of fluconazole-resistant isolates included in this study also exhibit decreased susceptibility against other triazoles, including the new investigational azole agents to which our patients have not had any previous exposure (8). This is in line with observations indicating that cross-resistance between different azoles, even investigational substances, can occur, as demonstrated by other authors (4).

In conclusion, caspofungin seems to be highly active against azole-susceptible and -resistant isolates, regardless of the underlying molecular mechanism(s) of azole resistance. It may therefore constitute an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of C. albicans infections, including those refractory to conventional treatment with triazole agents.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Merck & Co., Inc., and by Public Health Service grant 1 R01 DE11381.

We also thank Dominique Sanglard for providing us with the efflux pump mutant strains of C. albicans.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barchiesi, F., A. M. Schimizzi, A. W. Fothergill, G. Scalise, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro activity of the new echinocandin antifungal, MK-0991, against common and uncommon clinical isolates of Candida species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:302-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bartizal, K., C. J. Gill, G. K. Abruzzo, A. M. Flattery, L. Kong, P. M. Scott, J. G. Smith, C. E. Leighton, A. Bouffard, J. F. Dropinski, and J. Balkovec. 1997. In vitro preclinical evaluation studies with the echinocandin antifungal MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2326-2332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marco, F., M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, and R. N. Jones. 1998. Activity of MK-0991 (L-743,872), a new echinocandin, compared with those of LY303366 and four other antifungal agents tested against blood stream isolates of Candida spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32:33-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muller, F. M., M. Weig, J. Peter, and T. J. Walsh. 2000. Azole cross-resistance to ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole in clinical Candida albicans isolates from HIV-infected children with oropharyngeal candidosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:338-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 6.Nelson, P. W., M. Lozano-Chiu, and J. H. Rex. 1997. In vitro growth-inhibitory activity of pneumocandins L-733,560 and L-743,872 against putatively amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant Candida isolates: influence of assay conditions. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 35:285-287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Patterson, T. F., S. G. Revankar, W. R. Kirkpatrick, O. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, S. W. Redding, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1996. Simple method for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts with chromogenic agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1794-1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Perea, S., J. L. López-Ribot, W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. K. McAtee, R. A. Santillán, M. Mártinez, D. Calabrese, D. Sanglard, and T. F. Patterson. 2001. Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2676-2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1997. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 143:405-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1996. Susceptibilities of Candida albicans multidrug transporter mutants to various antifungal agents and other metabolic inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2300-2305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vazquez, J. A., M. Lynch, D. Boikov, and J. D. Sobel. 1997. In vitro activity of a new pneumocandin antifungal, L-743,872, against azole-susceptible and -resistant Candida species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1612-1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.White, T. C., K. A. Marr, and R. A. Bowden. 1998. Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:382-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES