Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pediatrics logoLink to Frontiers in Pediatrics
. 2026 Apr 2;14:1732348. doi: 10.3389/fped.2026.1732348

Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease initially presenting with severe digestive symptoms and progressing to systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report and literature review

Yi-De Li 1,†, Zhiwei Zhu 2,†, Hao-Dong Jiang 3, Qia Cheng 2, Man-Qiong Yang 2, Boyu Tan 4, Yu-Pin Tan 2,*
PMCID: PMC13083089  PMID: 42006577

Abstract

Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease (KFD), also known as histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis, is a rare idiopathic inflammatory disorder characterized by low incidence and a propensity for misdiagnosis. Although its etiology remains elusive, KFD is often linked to underlying autoimmune conditions. Definitive diagnosis requires lymph node biopsy. Classically, patients present with cervical lymphadenopathy and fever; however, this report describes an atypical, severe manifestation in a patient whose initial symptoms were dominated by prominent gastrointestinal involvement, including abdominal pain and vomiting. Histopathological evaluation of an excised lymph node confirmed the diagnosis. While corticosteroid therapy led to resolution of KFD symptoms, the patient's course was further complicated by the subsequent onset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Targeted immunosuppressive therapy for SLE ultimately achieved sustained remission. This case underscores the diagnostic pitfalls of KFD with an atypical gastrointestinal prodrome, reaffirms its established yet pivotal association with SLE, and advocates for vigilant long-term surveillance in affected individuals.

Keywords: antinuclear antibodies, Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, lymphadenopathy, pathology, systemic lupus erythematosus

Case presentation

A 14-year-old male patient presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain persisting for seven days and was admitted to our hospital on April 15, 2022. On physical examination, his body temperature was 36.8 °C, pulse rate was 76 beats per minute, respiratory rate was 20 breaths per minute, and blood pressure was 122/69 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa). No skin rashes or palpable superficial lymphadenopathy were detected, cardiopulmonary examinations showed no significant abnormalities. Mild tenderness was noted in the upper abdomen without rebound tenderness. Laboratory investigations tests were subsequently carried out. Peripheral blood count revealed a white blood cell count (WBC) of 0.65 × 109/L, neutrophils (N) at 0.27 × 109/L, and platelets (PLT) at 95 × 109/L. Liver function tests demonstrated elevated levels of alanine transaminase (ALT) at 222.80 U/L and aspartate transaminase (AST) at 372.16 U/L. Evidence of bone marrow hyperplasia was detected. Examination of bone marrow indicated some swollen granulocytes, prominent hemophagocytosis, notable megakaryocytes, and dispersed platelets in small clusters. Conversely, bone marrow biopsy revealed hypoplasia with an approximately normal granulocyte-to-erythrocyte ratio. The granulocyte lineage was mainly comprised of myelocyte and its earlier-stage cells, with scattered myeloblasts. The erythroid lineage included mostly intermediate and late-stage erythroblasts, with occasional early-stage precursors. Megakaryocytes, mainly polymorphonuclear, were detected at a frequency of 1–3 per high-power field (HPF). No fibroblast proliferation was observed in the bone marrow stroma. Screening for hepatitis, autoimmune liver diseases, respiratory virus antigens, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and multiple tumor markers yielded negative results. Imaging studies, including chest radiography and gastrointestinal endoscopy, indicated no significant abnormalities. The patient was treated with omeprazole to inhibit gastric acid secretion for gastric mucosal protection, phloroglucinol for spasmolysis and pain relief, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase peripheral neutrophil counts. Despite this, the clinical outcome was unsatisfactory. Given the multi-system involvement and unclear etiology, rheumatic connective tissue disease was suspected. Additional autoimmune tests revealed positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA, titer of 1:1,000 by indirect immunofluorescence) and a reduced serum complement C3 level of 0.74 g/L with normal C4 levels. Abdominal CT scans identified multiple small lymph nodes around the gastric fundus and the liver-gastric region, with the largest measuring 6 mm in diameter. On the eighth day of hospitalization, a soft, mobile, peanut-sized mass was palpated in the right mandible. Ultrasound confirmed this as an enlarged lymph node measuring approximately 20.5 mm × 7.6 mm. In the following day, additional enlarged lymph nodes were palpated in the left neck and left inguinal regions. Hence, a biopsy of the left cervical lymph node was performed (Figure 1). Immunohistochemistry findings revealed the following: CD30 (scattered +), CD21 (FDC network +), CD3 (+), Ki67 (+, 20%), CD123 (+), MPO (+), CD5 (−), CD68 (+), Bcl-2 (−), and Bcl-6 (−). These findings were consistent with the histopathology of histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, KFD). Following the lymph node biopsy, the patient developed a fever, with the peak temperature of 39.5 °C. On the third day of fever, treatment with prednisone acetate tablets (10 mg, three times daily) was initiated. The patient showed significant improvement upon three days of treatment and was subsequently discharged. Prednisone acetate was gradually tapered off after discharge. Follow-up visits on June 23, 2022, and August 16, 2022, revealed normalized blood counts and significantly reduced transaminase levels, with the ALT at 169.4 U/L and AST at 58.1 U/L.

Figure 1.

Microscopy panel with two labeled sample sets, marked as one and two, each showing progressive magnification of tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Insets highlight specific tissue regions, with boxes labeled a, b, c, d, and e, focusing on cellular and structural details for analysis.

Lymph node biopsy reveals that lymph node structures are partially preserved, with follicular hyperplasia, paracortical hyperplasia, and patchy, well-defined necrotic areas. The necrotic lesions are characterized by abundant degenerative nuclear fragments and a significant accumulation of histiocytes at the borders. Crescent-shaped histiocytes are prominently observed within the necrotic areas, with small lymphocytes, activated T cells, and some plasma cells scattered among the histiocytes. Neutrophils and eosinophils are notably absent. (1a) represents a normal lymph node. (1b) indicates paracortical hyperplasia. (1c) shows the significant accumulation of histiocytes. (2d) highlights the well-defined necrotic area. (2e) illustrates the necrotic nuclear fragments.

On March 7, 2023, the patient was readmitted for complaint of one-week history of fatigue and vomiting. Physical examination revealed erythema on both cheeks and the face (Figure 2), along with multiple palpable, soft, mobile lymph nodes in the neck and lower jaw, with the largest measuring approximately 20 mm in diameter. Laboratory tests revealed a WBC of 2.01 × 109/L and Neutrophils at 0.99 × 109/L, while red blood cells and PLT counts within normal ranges. Liver function tests indicated ALT of 79.2 U/L and an AST of 105.3 U/L. Although KFD recurrence was initially suspected, the presence of facial rashes raised concern for SLE, prompting further autoimmune testing. The results revealed positive ANA (titer 1:1,000), positive anti-Sm antibodies as well as positive anti-nRNP/Sm antibodies. According to the 2019 classification criteria for SLE (2019 EULAR/ACR), the patient scored a total of 13 points: 3 points for leukopenia, 6 points for positive anti-Sm antibodies, and 4 points for subacute cutaneous lupus rash, confirming the diagnosis of SLE. Additionally, the patient's 24 h urine protein was 1,433 mg. A subsequent kidney biopsy revealed mild lupus nephritis (Type I). The detailed laboratory test results of the patient during the two admissions are shown in (Table 1). Standard SLE therapy (prednisone acetate 60 mg daily, mycophenolate mofetil 720 mg twice daily, hydroxychloroquine sulfate 0.10 g twice daily, and belimumab 710 mg intravenously) was then administered. Following treatment, the patient showed significant improvement and was discharged. Currently followed up for almost 3 years, the patient was stable without any clinical symptoms. SLEDAI-2000 Score is 0, with negative autoantibodies, normal complement and urinary protein levels. Belimumab was discontinued and current treatment includes prednisone acetate (5 mg daily), mycophenolate mofetil (540 mg twice daily) and hydroxychloroquine sulfate (0.10 g twice daily).Therefore, a timeline summarizing the patient's clinical course and interventions is presented (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Close-up view of a person's face with multiple red, inflamed acne lesions on both cheeks. Eyes are obscured by a black bar for anonymity. Skin texture and lip contours are clearly visible.

Erythema on both cheeks and the face of the patient.

Table 1.

Comprehensive laboratory test results for the pediatric patient at initial and subsequent hospital admissions.

Indicators Reference range First hospital admission Second hospital admission
White blood cells (mm3) 4,000–11,000 650 2,010
Proportion of classification (%)
Neutrophils 37–77 41.1 49.6
Lymphocytes 17–54 49.5 42.7
Platelets (mm3) 1,50,000–4,07,000 95,000 1,73,000
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.9–17.2 13.9 11.5
Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate (mm/h) 0–20 2 11
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 0–6 3.19 3.22
Serum creatinine (μmol/L) 37–93 44.63 64.00
Liver function
ALT (U/L) 7–43 222.80 79.2
AST (U/L) 12–37 372.16 105.3
Albumin (g/L) 42–56 43.4 43.45
Ferritin (ng/mL) 22–275 14,370 1,320
Autoantibodies
Antinuclear Antibody Negative 1:1,000 1:1,000
Anti-Sm antibody Negative Negative Negative
Anti-dsDNA Antibody Negative Negative Negative
Complement levels
C3 (g/L) 0.90–1.80 0.74 1.05
C4 (g/L) 0.10–0.40 0.16 0.24
Urine tests
Urinary protein Negative Negative 1+
Urinary red blood cells (/HP) 0–6 0 0
Urinary white blood cells (/HP) 0–8 0 7
24 h Urinary protein (mg/24 h) <150 <150 1,433
Blood culture Sterile growth Sterile growth Sterile growth
EBV-DNA(copies/mL) 4.00E + 02 <4.00E + 02 <4.00E + 02
CMV-DNA(copies/mL) 4.00E + 02 <4.00E + 02 <4.00E + 02
T-SPOT Negative Negative Negative

Figure 3.

Disease progression timeline chart illustrates clinical events, diagnostic procedures, symptoms, follow-ups, diagnoses, and therapeutic interventions for a patient from April 2022 through early 2026, using color.

Timeline of key clinical events and therapeutic interventions for the patient.

Discussion

The exact cause and mechanism of KFD remains unclear, although viral infections or autoimmune responses are suspected to play a role (1–3). KFD is a self-limiting condition characterized by leukopenia and a lack of response to antibiotic treatment, which supports a potential viral etiology. A study indicated that viruses such as EBV and herpes simplex virus may be implicated (4–6). Most patients with KFD exhibit negative serological markers for autoimmune diseases, such as ANA and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, with only a minority showing positive results (7–9). In this case, the patient initially presented with positive ANA (titer of 1:1,000) but did not meet the diagnostic criteria for SLE. A diagnosis of KFD was established through lymph node biopsy. Notably, the progression of KFD to autoimmune conditions, particularly SLE, has been reported in previous literature (8, 10, 11). The patient was subsequently diagnosed with SLE during a second hospitalization. Nevertheless, the precise mechanism underlying the progression from KFD to autoimmune diseases remains poorly understood and warrants further investigation. It is also possible that the patient initially presented with both KFD and SLE, though the evidence of SLE may not have been apparent at the time. The diagnostic process for SLE can be lengthy, often taking 1–2 years or more to confirm (12–15). This highlights the importance of close monitoring in patients with KFD who test positive for autoimmune markers such as ANA or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. In this case, the presence of a high-titer ANA and low complement C3 at the initial KFD presentation may not have been a mere coincidence but rather an early immunological signature of a concomitant, subclinical autoimmune process. This could suggest that in some patients, KFD and SLE may represent different phases on a spectrum of an aberrant immune response, possibly triggered by an unknown viral or environmental stimulus in a genetically predisposed individual. The KFD episode could have been an intense, organ-specific (lymph node) inflammatory manifestation that preceded the full systemic evolution into classifiable SLE. Early detection and intervention are crucial, as these patients may have an increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases or coexisting inflammatory conditions.

KFD lacks specific clinical features and typically follows an acute or subacute course lasting for several weeks. Most patients present with posterior cervical lymphadenopathy (60%–90%), often with involvement of axillary and/or supraclavicular lymph nodes (16–19). The affected lymph nodes are typically firm and tender. Lymphadenopathy is commonly associated with fever with other nonspecific symptoms including weight loss, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, headache, and joint pain (4, 20–23). Skin lesions commonly associated with KFD frequently involve the face and upper body, presenting as rashes, nodules, erythematous papules, erythema induratum, or erythema multiforme (24–26). In this case, cervical lymphadenopathy was not identified in the first place. However, CT imaging revealed multiple small lymph nodes around the gastric fundus and liver, with enlarged lymph nodes palpated only in the right mandible by the 8th day of hospitalization. This pattern suggests that lymphadenopathy may have originated from internal organs and progressively involved superficial lymph nodes. The patient's gastrointestinal symptoms could be attributed to irritation of the gastrointestinal tract by the enlarged perigastric lymph nodes. Notably, some cases of gastrointestinal lymphadenopathy may present without noticeable clinical symptoms, potentially delaying medical consultation and diagnosis. KFD is a rare condition, and diagnosis relies on lymph node biopsy (27). Consequently, some patients may remain undiagnosed if they resolve spontaneously before the appearance of superficial lymphadenopathy. Laboratory test results in KFD are generally unremarkable, though mild anemia, slightly elevated C-reactive protein, and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate have been reported in some cases (3, 18, 28). Other laboratory findings may include leukopenia, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated transaminases (12, 20, 28, 29). Additionally, atypical lymphocytes can be observed in the peripheral blood of up to one-third of patients.

The diagnosis of KFD is primarily based on lymph node pathology and morphology. The clinical manifestations of KFD often closely resemble those of SLE, making differentiation between the two challenging based solely on lymph node morphology. Histologically, KFD typically shows partially preserved lymph node structures with follicular hyperplasia and an expanded paracortical area containing scattered, well-defined necrotic zones. The necrotic areas are characterized by abundant fragmented nuclear debris, with a notable accumulation of histiocytes at the borders. Additionally, the necrotic lesions in KFD also contain numerous crescent-shaped histiocytes, interspersed with scattered small lymphocytes, activated T cells, and some plasma cells (30). Notably, neutrophils and eosinophils are generally absent. The borders of the necrotic areas may show clusters of plasma cell-like dendritic cells and immunoblasts, along with blood vessels forming thrombi. In contrast, the most distinctive histological feature of SLE-related lymphadenopathy is the presence of hematoxylin bodies, although these are observed in only a small proportion of SLE patients (7). In this case, the patient did not meet the diagnostic criteria for SLE during the initial visit and was diagnosed with KFD based on lymph node biopsy findings. During the second hospitalization, the patient met the diagnostic criteria for SLE; however, no further lymph node biopsy was performed, precluding a direct comparison of lymph node pathology between KFD and SLE. Further research and case studies are warranted to better understand the histopathological differences and similarities between KFD and SLE-related lymphadenopathy. Notably, KFD has been associated with autoimmune diseases (31–35). A previous study reported that approximately 30% of KFD cases occurred prior to an SLE diagnosis, while around 23% of cases were diagnosed with SLE after KFD was recognized (36). The differential diagnostic features of KFD and SLE are summarized in (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, and pathological findings between KFD and SLE.

Characters SLE (%) KFD (%)
Clinical symptoms
Cervical Lymphadenopathy 40% 50%–98%
Generalized Lymphadenopathy 10% 1%–22%
Fever 52% 30%–67%
Weight loss 83% 10%–51%
Hepatosplenomegaly 10%–45% 1%–22%
Arthralgia/arthritis 60%/20% 5%–34%
Headache 25%–80% 17%–33%
Diarrhea Rare Rare
Skin lesions 53%–78% 10%–40%
Laboratory tests
Anemia 60%–70% 28%–54%
Leukopenia/lymphopenia 30%–40% 25%–58%
Thrombocytopenia 25%–50% 5%
ANA positive 70%–98% 8%–45%
Anti-dsDNA positive 70% 7%–18%
Decreased complement levels 47%–55% 21%–27%
Pathological examination
Histopathological examination Follicular hyperplasia, fragmented immunoblasts, plasma cells, increased vasculature, and Azzopardi phenomenon Subcapsular expansion with distinct, patchy necrotic areas containing amorphous eosinophilic and apoptotic fragments. Necrotic areas surrounded by abundant crescentic histiocytes and varying numbers of immunoblasts. Clustered plasma cell-like dendritic cells may also be observed.
Immunohistochemistry CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes CD8+ T lymphocytes, myeloperoxidase+, CD68+, CD123+

In conclusion, KFD is a rare, benign, self-limiting condition, although it has the potential to progress to other autoimmune diseases, particularly SLE. In patients with KFD who test positive for autoimmune markers, close follow-up is essential to monitor the development of autoimmune disease or the coexistence of self-limiting inflammatory conditions.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Health Commission of Hunan Province Research Program (grant no. B202306017285), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Joint Fund (grant no. 2022JJ80066).

Footnotes

Edited by: Erkan Demirkaya, Western University, Canada

Reviewed by: Zhihui Li, Hunan Children’s Hospital, China

Nithya Gunawardena, Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine (Sri Lanka), Sri Lanka

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Medical Ethics Committee of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s) legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YDL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Writing – original draft. ZWZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HDJ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. QC: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. MQY: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. BYT: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision. YPT: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Chong Y, Kang CS. Causative agents of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease (histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis): a meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. (2014) 78(11):1890–7. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahmed Z, Quadir H, Hakobyan K, Gaddam M, Kannan A, Ojinnaka U, et al. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: a rare cause of cervical lymphadenopathy. Cureus. (2021) 13(8):e17021. 10.7759/cureus.17021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bosch X, Guilabert A. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2006) 1:18. 10.1186/1750-1172-1-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cuglievan B, Miranda RN. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease. Blood. (2017) 129(7):917. 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hudnall SD, Tang YW, Hasserjian RP, McClain CM, Wang B, Mosse CA. Detection of human herpesvirus DNA in Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. (2008) 1(4):362–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosado FG, Tang YW, Hasserjian RP, McClain CM, Wang B, Mosse CA. Kikuchi-Fujimoto lymphadenitis: role of parvovirus B-19, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6, and human herpesvirus 8. Hum Pathol. (2013) 44(2):255–9. 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perry AM, Choi SM. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2018) 142(11):1341–6. 10.5858/arpa.2018-0219-RA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sopena B, Rivera A, Vázquez-Triñanes C, Fluiters E, González-Carreró J, del Pozo M, et al. Autoimmune manifestations of Kikuchi disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2012) 41(6):900–6. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sopeña B, Rivera A, Chamorro A, Freire M, Alende V, Seco E, et al. Clinical association between Kikuchi’s disease and systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2017) 47(1):46–52. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stefanou MI, Ott G, Ziemann U, Mengel A. Histiocytic necrotising lymphadenitis identical to Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease in CNS lupus. BMJ Case Rep. (2018) 2018:bcr-2018. 10.1136/bcr-2018-225668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yousefi M, Rukerd MRZ, Binafar H, Shoaie S, Mirkamali H, Pourzand P, et al. The co-occurrence of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease and systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report. J Med Case Rep. (2023) 17(1):448. 10.1186/s13256-023-04186-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Selvanathan SN, Suhumaran S, Sahu VK, Chong CY, Tan NWH, Thoon KC. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease in children. J Paediatr Child Health. (2020) 56(3):389–93. 10.1111/jpc.14628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahajan VK, Sharma V, Sharma N, Rani R. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. (2023) 11(16):3664–79. 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i16.3664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hua CZ, Chen YK, Chen SZ, Gu WZ, Shu Q. Histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis mimicking acute appendicitis in a child: a case report. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:682738. 10.3389/fped.2021.682738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sahin S, Adrovic A, Barut K, Canpolat N, Ozluk Y, Kilicaslan I, et al. Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus in Turkey: demographic, clinical and laboratory features with disease activity and outcome. Lupus. (2018) 27(3):514–9. 10.1177/0961203317747717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Astudillo L. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease. Rev Med Interne. (2010) 31(11):757–65. 10.1016/j.revmed.2010.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen LC, Wang CJ, Chang YC, Shie SS, Lin TY, Hsieh YC, et al. Distribution of lymphadenopathy in patients with Kikuchi disease. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. (2021) 54(2):299–304. 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim TY, Ha KS, Kim Y, Lee JH, Lee KC, Lee JW. Characteristics of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease in children compared with adults. Eur J Pediatr. (2014) 173(1):111–6. 10.1007/s00431-013-2131-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdu A, Pajkrt D, Bijker EM. Kikuchi disease in children: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2022) 41(3):199–204. 10.1097/INF.0000000000003397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mathews D, McMahon P, Bolton M. Unusual cause of prolonged fever of unknown origin. Clin Pediatr. (2018) 57(2):245–7. 10.1177/0009922817693303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choi S, Choi HS, Ryu YJ, Kim JY, Paik JH, Ahn S, et al. Characterization of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease in children and risk factors associated with its course. J Pediatr. (2023) 260:113515. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zheng Y, Du Y, Zhu WH, Zhao CG. Clinical analysis of 44 children with subacute necrotizing lymphadenitis. Infect Drug Resist. (2022) 15:1449–57. 10.2147/IDR.S351191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kucukardali Y, Solmazgul E, Kunter E, Oncul O, Yildirim S, Kaplan M. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: analysis of 244 cases. Clin Rheumatol. (2007) 26(1):50–4. 10.1007/s10067-006-0230-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Soto-Moreno A, Vílchez-Márquez F, Narváez-Simón M, Castro-Martín J, Ramos-Pleguezuelos FM, Soto-Díaz A, et al. Pediatric Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: case report and review of cutaneous and histopathologic features in childhood. Dermatopathology. (2025) 12(1):7. 10.3390/dermatopathology12010007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim JH, Kim YB, In SI, Kim YC, Han JH. The cutaneous lesions of Kikuchi’s disease: a comprehensive analysis of 16 cases based on the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence studies with an emphasis on the differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. (2010) 41(9):1245–54. 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuo TT. Cutaneous manifestation of Kikuchi’s histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis. Am J Surg Pathol. (1990) 14(9):872–6. 10.1097/00000478-199009000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Onciu M, Medeiros LJ. Kikuchi-Fujimoto lymphadenitis. Adv Anat Pathol. (2003) 10(4):204–11. 10.1097/00125480-200307000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang D Su GX, Wu FQ, Zhu J, Kang M, Xu YJ et al. Clinical features and prognosis of 118 children with histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2023) 61(6):533–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lou D, Song Y. Clinical features of histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis in children. Eur J Pediatr. (2024) 183(3):1333–9. 10.1007/s00431-023-05391-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seong GM, Kim JH, Lim GC, Kim J. Clinicopathological review of immunohistochemically defined Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease-including some interesting cases. Clin Rheumatol. (2012) 31(10):1463–9. 10.1007/s10067-012-2036-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brisse E, Wouters CH, Matthys P. Advances in the pathogenesis of primary and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: differences and similarities. Br J Haematol. (2016) 174(2):203–17. 10.1111/bjh.14147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bosch X, Guilabert A, Miquel R, Campo E. Enigmatic Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: a comprehensive review. Am J Clin Pathol. (2004) 122(1):141–52. 10.1309/YF081L4TKYWVYVPQ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jung HJ, Lee IJ, Yoon SH. Risk assessment of recurrence and autoimmune disorders in Kikuchi disease. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2020) 13:1687–93. 10.2147/RMHP.S271283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang Y, Lian H, Ma H, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Zhang L, et al. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis: a clinical study of 13 children and literature review. J Pediatr. (2021) 229:267–74 e3. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaccarelli F, de Vincentiis M, D’Erme G, Greco A, Natalucci F, Fusconi M. Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: a distinct pathological entity but also an “overlap” autoimmune syndrome: a systematic review. Curr Rheumatol Rev. (2023) 19(2):159–67. 10.2174/1573397118666220903123128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kampitak T. Fatal Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease associated with SLE and hemophagocytic syndrome: a case report. Clin Rheumatol. (2008) 27(8):1073–5. 10.1007/s10067-008-0902-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.


Articles from Frontiers in Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES