Skip to main content
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife logoLink to International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
. 2026 Mar 30;29:101223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2026.101223

Rapid suspension-based screening of Trichinella, Alaria and Sarcocystis spp. in game and processed meat

Alexandra Juhász a,b,⁎, Gábor Majoros c
PMCID: PMC13083301  PMID: 42006680

Abstract

Foodborne zoonoses affect nearly 10% of the global population each year, with parasitic disease making up a significant proportion of these infection. Meat-borne parasites of zoonotic relevance, including Trichinella spp., Sarcocystis spp., and Alaria alata, can be transmitted through pork and other meats, with trichinellosis remaining a significant public health concern despite effective control in domestic pigs. This study introduces a simple, rapid suspension-based method for detecting major meat-borne parasites in fresh and processed meat. The method is intended for rapid, field-applicable detection in research or monitoring where laboratory equipment is limited. Encapsulated Trichinella spp. larvae and Alaria spp. mesocercariae were obtained from naturally infected wild boar muscle and spiked into non-infected pork, minced meat, and sausages (five capsules and five larvae per 50 g; n = 15). Samples were blended with water, filtered, stained with Nile blue or neutral red, cleared with dilute acetic acid, and examined under a stereomicroscope. All spiked Trichinella and Alaria larvae were detected in the experimentally prepared samples under controlled spiking conditions. This corresponds to an experimental recovery level of five larvae per 50 g sample. These findings reflect observations obtained under laboratory conditions and do not represent formally validated diagnostic performance parameters. The method also visualised dead or calcified Trichinella capsules and Sarcocystis cysts within muscle fibres, demonstrating its applicability for detecting multiple parasites in muscle tissue. While not intended to replace official digestion tests, this low-cost method provides a practical tool for detecting multiple meat-borne parasites in fresh and processed tissues. It can enhance field diagnostics and research in resource-limited settings, supporting food safety surveillance, public health, and studies of parasite co-infections in wild or domestic animal populations.

Keywords: Alaria trematodes, Foodborne parasites, Meat inspection, Sarcocystis spp., Trichinella spp., Zoonoses

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • •

    Rapid method detects Trichinella, Alaria, and Sarcocystis spp. in meat.

  • •

    Method identifies live, dead, and calcified Trichinella larvae easily.

  • •

    Method works on raw, minced, and processed meat under field conditions.

  • •

    Enables simultaneous detection of multiple meat-borne parasites in one assay.

  • •

    Provides a practical tool for food safety monitoring in resource-limited settings.

1. Introduction

Foodborne zoonoses, particularly those transmitted via meat, constitute a significant global public health concern, with parasitic infections contributing substantially to this burden (Kagira et al., 2009; Djurković-Djaković et al., 2013). The increasing popularity of free-range farming, consumption of game meat, and organic production systems may enhance human exposure to meat-borne parasites due to closer interactions between wildlife and livestock. Among these, Trichinella spp., Alaria alata, Sarcocystis spp., and Taenia solium are frequently detected in pork and wild game (Freeman et al., 1976; Korpysa-Dzirba et al., 2021; Klich et al., 2022; Malone et al., 2024).

Trichinella and Alaria species are of particular zoonotic relevance. Both parasites are commonly associated with the consumption of wild boar (Sus scrofa) meat (Ch'ung-sung, 1958; Castaño Zubieta et al., 2014; Bandino et al., 2023). Despite effective control programs reducing Trichinella spiralis infections in domestic pigs, the sylvatic cycle maintained by wildlife continues to pose a risk (Rostami et al., 2017; Gherman et al., 2022; Pozio, 2022). Globally, approximately 66,000 human cases were reported between 1986 and 2009 (Murrell and Pozio, 2011). The ability of Trichinella spp. to thrive in diverse hosts and environments complicates its control (Wakelin, 1993; Gottstein et al., 2009; Hill et al., 2010). Although severe or fatal cases are rare, human trichinellosis underscores the need for continuous surveillance and preventive measures. (Rostami et al., 2017). Similarly, A. alata is widespread among wild boars across Europe, and its mesocercariae have been detected in raw or undercooked game meat (Edwards et al., 2014; Korpysa-Dzirba et al., 2021). As both Trichinella spp. and Alaria spp. may co-occur in the same host, the development of diagnostic methods capable of detecting multiple meat-borne parasites is increasingly important. Moreover, wild boars may also harbour Sarcocystis spp., some of which are zoonotic and transmitted via undercooked meat (Dubey et al., 2016; Rosenthal, 2021; Brown et al., 2025).

Molecular methods offer high sensitivity for parasite identification (Gazzonis et al., 2019) but require laboratory infrastructure, limiting their applicability under field conditions. The standard artificial digestion technique is the gold standard for Trichinella spp. detection; however, it is laborious, costly, and cannot simultaneously detect other zoonotic parasites that may be present in meat (Nöckler et al., 2000; Noeckler et al., 2019). The suspension-based method described here provides a practical complementary approach for rapid on-site detection of meat-borne parasites in domestic and wild animals. Here, we present a simplified suspension-based method for the simultaneous detection of Trichinella spp., Alaria spp., and Sarcocystis spp. not only in raw but also in processed meat where the parasites are dead and their body are not resistant against liquefying effect of artificial digestion. This low-cost, field-applicable approach enhances food safety monitoring and parasitological surveillance in domestic and wild animals.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample preparation

Muscle samples from wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses, naturally infected with Trichinella species, were examined by trichinoscopy (compressorium technique) to reveal presence of encapsulated Trichinella larvae. Encapsulated Trichinella larvae were manually excised together with small fragments of surrounding muscle tissue from naturally infected wild boar samples. From each wild boar muscle sample, pieces of muscle containing five Trichinella capsules were excised and each set of five capsules was homogenized into 50 g of Trichinella-negative pork. The same spiking procedure was applied to Trichinella-negative minced pork and to commercially produced pork sausages (50 g portions); five encapsulated Trichinella larvae were added per 50 g portion. Each meat type was prepared in quintuplicate (n = 5 independent 50 g replicates per matrix). Additionally, five Alaria spp. mesocercariae were added to each 50 g replicate of the three meat matrices (n = 5 replicates per matrix). Wild boar muscle samples naturally contained Sarcocystis spp. cysts, which were therefore present in the spiked test samples. These cysts were not visible in unstained compressed muscle preparations but were detected by the described suspension-based method. Pork muscle, minced meat and sausage portions were cut into ∼1 cm3 pieces using scissors. Samples were processed within 1 h of spiking and stored at room temperature prior to analysis. Each 50 g sample was placed in a domestic blender (Tefal Blendforce II, model BL420840, 600 W; Tefal Group, Rumilly, France) with cold tap water (approx. 200 mL) sufficient to submerge the blades and homogenized for 3–4 min at full speed to obtain a uniform suspension. The suspension was diluted with tap water to a final volume of 1 L to facilitate subsequent filtration.

2.2. Filtration and sedimentation

The suspension was passed through a 1.0–2.0 mm mesh pasta strainer into a 1 L plastic bucket. The blender container was rinsed with cold water, and the washings were filtered through the strainer into the bucket. Tissue debris retained in the strainer or on the blender blades (visible connective tissue and fat) was discarded. The suspension was diluted with additional cold water and left to settle for 7–8 min at room temperature (∼20–22 °C). The supernatant was carefully decanted, and fresh water was added to repeat the sedimentation process. The washing and sedimentation cycle was repeated 2–3X until the supernatant was clear of fat droplets and fine, light-pink muscle fragments were observed at the bottom.

2.3. Staining and microscopy

A portion (∼5 mL) of the sediment were transferred to Petri dishes or white porcelain plates. Nile blue or neutral red dye solution (0.5–1 mL for 1% solution or 3–4 mL for 0.1%) was added to the sediment and mixed until the suspension was lightly coloured. The dye adhered to the solid particles with the surrounding water becoming nearly colourless within 2 min. To enhance contrast and visibility, 10% acetic acid was added dropwise until the background cleared (typically 8-10 drops). The acid cleared the background by removing dye from fragmented muscle fibres without blenching the more compact structures, such as the Trichinella capsules and other parasites covered with a membranous layer. Samples were examined using a stereo microscope at 20–30 × magnification (binocular, 10 × oculars, objective 0.5–5 × ) with top illumination. Trichinella capsules, if present, were identified as spindle-shaped structures that stained blue or red, depending on the dye used. Nile blue and neutral red were selected due to their strong affinity for compact structures containing numerous nuclei or necrotic material. This ensures high visibility under a stereo microscope, even after acetic acid treatment. A stereo microscope with at least 20 × magnification and top illumination is sufficient for examination. An optimal setup includes a binocular stereo microscope with 10 × oculars and objective lenses ranging from 0.5 × to 5 × magnification. The characteristic morphology of larvae inside the capsule or presence of other parasites allowed for further verification under higher magnification if required.

3. Results

The suspension-based method was evaluated on 15 laboratory-prepared samples consisting of pork muscle, minced meat, and sausage, each spiked with five encapsulated Trichinella spp. larvae and five Alaria spp. mesocercariae per 50 g of non-infected meat (n = 15). Unknown Sarcocystis spp. cysts naturally present in the same tissues were also included for visual assessment (Table 1). All artificially spiked Trichinella and Alaria larvae were detected in all experimentally prepared samples. This corresponds to the recovery of five larvae per 50 g portion under controlled laboratory spiking conditions. No formal limit-of-detection assessment was performed. The technique also enabled the detection of calcified and necrotic Trichinella capsules, as well as Sarcocystis cysts, which were not visualised by compression or digestion methods.

Table 1.

Detection of spiked Trichinella spp. Larvae, Alaria alata mesocercariae and Sarcocystis spp. cysts in different meat sample types using the suspension-based method.

Sample type No. of spiked Trichinella capsules and Alaria alata mesocercariae Sample weight (g) Suspension result for Trichinella capsules and Alaria alata mesocercariae Comment
Pork muscle chunks 5-5 50 Positive (5/5) 6 Sarcocystis spp. cyst in the sample
Minced meat 5-5 50 Positive (5/5) 7 Sarcocystis spp. cyst in the sample
Sausage 5-5 50 Positive (5/5) 9 Sarcocystis spp. cyst in the sample

Total tested 15–15 150 15/15 positive 22 Sarcocystis spp. cyst

Distinct spindle-shaped Trichinella capsules, containing intact larva were clearly visible under stereomicroscopy, retaining intense blue or red coloration depending on the dye used (Nile blue or neutral red). Due to their higher density, the stained capsules settled quicker than the fragmented muscle fibres at the bottom of the suspension after decantation, even following mild acetic acid treatment (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), allowing clear differentiation from surrounding tissue debris. Metabolic residues around the larvae, primarily phospholipids and degraded material, also retained the dyes, enhancing visual contrast.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Size comparison and visualization of Trichinella cysts and larvae A) Size of Trichinella cysts in a Petri dish compared to a matchstick, stained with neutral red (size of capsules: ∼500 μm). B) Trichinella capsule with larvae (black arrow) and Sarcocystis spp. cysts (white arrow) in Petri-dishes from wild boar at 50X magnification stained with Nile blue.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Trichinella spp. and additional parasites detected using differential staining. Trichinella capsule with larva at 700X magnification, A) stained with Nile blue, B) stained with neutral red at 700X magnification.

Capsules lacking live larvae exhibited stable and distinct staining, allowing recognition of calcified or dead Trichinella larvae (Fig. 3). Although staining intensity gradually faded with prolonged acid exposure, it remained adequate for reliable microscopic evaluation throughout the observation period.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Detection of dead or calcified Trichinella larvae using staining techniques. A) Capsule with dead, necrotised larva stained with Nile blue. B) Fully necrotised capsule without recognizable larva stained with neutral red (Magnifications as same as in case of Fig. 2).

The method performed consistently across all sample types, including fatty matrices such as minced meat and sausage, without reduction in parasite detectability. Occasionally, inorganic particles such as lime sediment were observed but could be readily distinguished, as they did not retain dye or they have irregular shape. The complete test procedure, including sample preparation and equipment cleaning, required approximately 1 h per operator.

In addition to Trichinella and Alaria, the suspension method enabled the simultaneous detection of Sarcocystis spp. cysts in the same muscle samples (Fig. 4) and identified co-occurring zoonotic parasites such as Alaria alata mesocercariae within the same tissues (Fig. 5). Due to the lack of test samples containing such parasites, we did not have the opportunity to more precisely determine the sensitivity of the proposed method, but it was clearly demonstrated that several parasites can be detected in the same way with this procedure.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sarcocystis spp. cyst released from muscle fibre, providing similar staining by Nile blue and size to Trichinella capsules, aiding diagnostic accuracy. (1000x magnification).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Nile blue stained Alaria larva in muscle tissue enhancing diagnostic scope by using the suspension method. (200x magnification).

4. Discussion

4.1. Principle of the test method

The average density of parasites in meat is always slightly higher than the density of the surrounding muscle tissue, because they contain more cells (nuclei) per unit volume than muscle tissue. Therefore, they settle faster in suspended tissue debris than muscle fibers.

The dyes used in the method stain parasites more intensely than muscle tissue containing few nuclei, because due to the many nuclei, they contain more phospholipids and, after their destruction, more fatty acids than intact muscle. Therefore, neutral red and Nile blue, which have long been used for histological examinations (Romeis, 1948), are also suitable for selective staining of parasites. The dye can be used in a similar way to make dead parasites visible and to recognize tumor cells (Lin et al., 1991). Acetic acid penetrates muscle fibers faster than parasites, so the latter fade more slowly under the influence of the acid.

4.2. Advantages and disadvantages of the simplified suspension method for meat-borne parasites examination

The suspension method proved particularly useful under field conditions and in rural areas where access to accredited laboratories is limited, enabling on-site inspections with minimal resources. Artificial digestion remains the internationally accepted reference method for Trichinella detection (Forbes and Gajadhar, 1999). The suspension-based approach is not intended to replace regulated inspection protocols but may serve as a complementary exploratory tool under field conditions. Unlike digestion, which dissolves non-viable larvae and capsules, the suspension technique preserves both viable and non-viable structures, which may provide additional epidemiological information. However, formal comparative validation studies are required to define its diagnostic performance relative to established methods. By detecting calcified and necrotic larvae in addition to live ones, it complements standard artificial digestion and trichinoscopy, providing additional epidemiological information that might otherwise be overlooked. Compared with trichinoscopy, the method allows processing of larger sample volumes while allowing examination of larger sample volumes under field conditions. These characteristics make it a valuable complementary tool for improving food safety surveillance, especially in resource-limited settings.

The suspension method efficiently separated interfering components such as fat and connective tissue. Fat droplets floated and were removed during decantation, whereas connective tissue fibres adhered to the blender blades or were retained by the strainer. Residual fat exhibited a characteristic red-brown coloration after acetic acid exposure, allowing easy distinction from parasite structures, even in high-fat matrices such as minced meat or sausages.

Those Trichinella larvae that may have escaped from their capsules and those which have not yet settled inside a muscle cell are paler in colour, but if they are alive, they can be easily recognised by their movement. Unfortunately, if these larvae are no longer alive and thus immobile during the test, they are less conspicuous than intact Trichinella capsules. (Live, bare larvae from raw tissue can be identified better using the digestion method.) By the suggested method, the distinctive appearance and coloration of the capsules make the presence of larvae easily recognizable.

The method also remained applicable to dried meat samples that were subsequently rehydrated, although capsules occasionally adhered to each other, resulting in weaker staining but still allowing visual identification. In marinated meat treated with mild acid or 10% vinegar, capsules often disintegrated, leaving only faintly stained, dead larvae, which can be recognised with experience. Despite these limitations, the suspension approach seems suitable for detecting Trichinella, Alaria and Sarcocystis spp. in various meat types, including dried products such as sausages and hams where parasites are typically non-viable.

In terms of specificity, the method is particularly relevant in European regions where encapsulated Trichinella species and other food-borne zoonotic parasites are endemic (Pozio, 2019). Encapsulated larvae are more easily differentiated from other nematode larvae than free forms, which may resemble species of unrelated taxa. Based on the present spiking experiments (five larvae per 50 g sample), the method demonstrated successful recovery under controlled laboratory conditions. However, formal sensitivity, specificity, and limit-of-detection parameters remain to be determined in future validation studies. Future studies should focus on field validation and quantitative comparison with established digestion assays to fully define sensitivity and specificity parameters.

Compared with traditional trichinoscopy under light microscopy (Kohler and Ruitenberg, 1974), the suspension-based method may facilitate improved visualization in dense or processed meat matrices; however, direct comparative validation studies are required. Although additional steps such as spreading the suspension on slides or using a compressorium can enhance visibility, they may increase examination time.

The suspension method does not dissolve tissues, so it can also detect parasites that are dissolved by enzymes. This is beneficial in cases where domestic or wild boars harbour other zoonotic food-borne parasites, such as Sarcocystis cysts (Helman et al., 2023). Sarcocystis does not produce visible lesions at slaughter (Rubiola et al., 2024), but its frequent occurrence can serve as an internal procedural control during application of suspension method. These protozoan cysts can be useful in allowing examiners to calibrate visual recognition of parasitic structures due to their high frequency and similar behaviour to Trichinella cysts; thereby improving diagnostic accuracy (Fig. 4). In addition, the method also detects Alaria alata mesocercariae that may co-occur with Trichinella larvae in the same tissues, providing further diagnostic information (Fig. 5).

4.3. Potential limitations in the muscle suspension examination technique

As with any diagnostic approach, the reliability of the suspension method depends on careful execution. Excessive tissue density in the suspension or uneven distribution in the Petri dish can obscure parasites, while incomplete decantation may leave floating debris that interferes with staining. Proper decantation and clearing are therefore essential before dye application.

For aged or processed meat samples such as smoked ham or long-frozen tissue, staining intensity may decrease due to reduced dye diffusion. Adjusting staining duration or dye concentration can compensate for this effect. Because Trichinella capsule density varies, parasites are often concentrated near the bottom of the suspension; thus, examining multiple Petri dishes and focusing on the sedimented layer is recommended. Faint staining can be enhanced by adding additional dye, whereas overstaining can be corrected by repeated acetic acid treatment. To avoid bubble formation, stagnant water should be used rather than freshly drawn tap water.

4.4. Some arguments for using the muscle suspension-based method

In slaughterhouse inspections, high diagnostic sensitivity is required because pooled samples from multiple animals must be tested rapidly. However, when individual animals are examined, Trichinella larvae can often be detected with less sensitive yet simpler methods if larger muscle portions are taken from predilection sites. This increases the probability of larval detection even without sophisticated laboratory infrastructure.

While disease severity is generally associated with infectious dose, even low-level infections are epidemiologically relevant. Therefore, any field-applicable screening method should be interpreted with caution and does not replace regulated inspection protocols. (Dupouy-Camet, 2000; Murrell and Pozio, 2011; Malone et al., 2024).

The suspension-based method is particularly useful for rapid screening of individual samples when the origin or prior laboratory testing of the meat is uncertain. Its simplicity, speed, and low cost make it suitable for field veterinarians and private practitioners. Although artificial digestion remains the gold standard for routine meat inspection, the suspension method offers a practical, on-site alternative for identifying Trichinella, Alaria, and Sarcocystis spp. Its minimal equipment requirements and cost-effectiveness make it an attractive complementary tool for researchers, inspectors, and field diagnosticians. This quick method is also very useful if you want to demonstrate parasites in meat to students during practical training. When integrated into local surveillance programmes, it can support regulatory efforts by facilitating individual sample testing in areas lacking accredited laboratory facilities.

Overall, the suspension-based method represents a practical exploratory tool for field use, with potential complementary value once validated under controlled field conditions. It can be assumed that the method can also detect other parasites in meat (e.g. Toxoplasma cyst, cysticerci, Ancylostoma, Strongyloides larvae etc.) that we have not had the opportunity to examine.

5. Conclusion

This study presents a simplified suspension method as a practical and cost-effective alternative to traditional meat-borne parasites detection techniques where accredited laboratory access is unavailable. The method's versatility across different meat matrices and ease of use make it suitable for both routine inspections and emergency assessments, particularly in resource-limited or research fieldwork settings. Its ability to detect live, dead, and calcified Trichinella larvae, Alaria alata mesocercariae and Sarcocystis across diverse meat conditions underscores its potential to complement existing diagnostic tools. While the method does not replace the gold standard of artificial digestion mandated for public safety, it provides a valuable solution for individual meat samples, especially in scenarios where access to specialized equipment is limited. This aligns with broader goals of enhancing food safety and controlling zoonotic diseases. It bridges the gap between classical trichinoscopy and enzymatic digestion by combining simplicity with improved visualization. Future research should focus on large-scale validation under field conditions, quantitative performance comparison with digestion assays, and assessment of its integration into national food safety surveillance systems.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Alexandra Juhász: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Gábor Majoros: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval for this study was not required for using animals killed as a part of routine hunting management control program. No animal was sacrificed for this study. The wild boar sample used for analysis here was submitted for diagnostic purposes to the Department of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine.

Declaration statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our helpful veterinary colleagues and hunters for the wild boar muscle pieces. The Alaria alata specimens used as comparison material were provided by Professor Georg Duscher of the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna.

References

  1. Bandino E., Gomez-Morales M.A., Brundu D., Soddu M., Ludovisi A., Cabras P.A., Pozio E. The illegal rearing and slaughtering of pigs in the wild on the Mediterranean island of Sardinia favor an increase in the biomass of Trichinella britovi in wild boars (Sus scrofa) but do not affect the serological prevalence of infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 2023;16:323. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05927-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown K., Rendall A.R., Barton D.P., Shamsi S. Sarcocystis miescheriana. Trends Parasitol. 2025;S1471–4922(25):290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2025.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castaño Zubieta R., Ruiz M., Morici G., Lovera R., Fernández M.S., Caracostantogolo J., Cavia R. First report of Trichinella spiralis from the white-eared (Didelphis albiventris) and the thick-tailed opossum (Lutreolina crassicaudata) in central Argentina. Helminthologia. 2014;51:198–202. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ch'ung-Sung F. O sluchaiakh zarazheniia trikhinnellezom cherez miaso kabana (Sus scrofa) v Kazakhstane [Case of Trichinella infection caused by boar (Sus scrofa) meat in Kazakhstan] Med. Parazitol. (Mosk). 1958;27:447–449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Djurković-Djaković O., Bobić B., Nikolić A., Klun I., Dupouy-Camet J. Pork as a source of human parasitic infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013;19:586–594. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubey J.P., Calero-Bernal R., Rosenthal B.M., Speer C.A., Fayer R. second ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2016. Sarcocystosis of Animals and Humans; p. 481. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dupouy-Camet J. 93. Vet. Parasitol.; 2000. pp. 191–200. (Trichinellosis: a Worldwide Zoonosis). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards S., Prunier A., Bonde M., Stockdale E.A. Organic pig production in Europe—Animal health, welfare and production challenges. Org. Agric. For. 2014;4:79–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Forbes L.B., Gajadhar A.A. A validated Trichinella digestion assay and an associated sampling and quality assurance system for use in testing pork and horse meat. J. Food Protect. 1999;62:1308–1313. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.11.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeman R.S., Stuart P.F., Cullen S.J., Ritchie A.C., Mildon A., Fernandes B.J., Bonin R. Fatal human infection with mesocercariae of the trematode Alaria americana. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1976;25:803–807. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1976.25.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gazzonis A.L., Gjerde B., Villa L., Minazzi S., Zanzani S.A., Riccaboni P., Sironi G., Manfredi M.T. Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis miescheriana and Sarcocystis suihominis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Italy. Parasitol. Res. 2019;118:1271–1287. doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06249-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gherman C.M., Boros Z., Băieş M.H., Cozma-Petruț A., Cozma V. A review of Trichinella species infection in wild animals in Romania. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022;28 doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gottstein B., Pozio E., Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009;22:127–145. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00026-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Helman E., Dellarupe A., Cifuentes S., Chang Reissig E., Moré G. Identification of Sarcocystis spp. in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from Argentina. Parasitol. Res. 2023;122:471–478. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07743-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill D.E., Pierce V., Murrell K.D., Ratliffe N., Rupp B., Fournet V.M., Zarlenga D.S., Rosenthal B.M., Gamble H.R., Kelly K., Dulin M. Cessation of Trichinella spiralis transmission among scavenging mammals after the removal of infected pigs from a poorly managed farm: implications for trichinae transmission in the US. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010;57:e116–e123. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kagira J.M., Maingi N., Kanyari P.W.N., Githigia S.M., Ng'ang'a J.C., Gachohi J.M. Characteristics of pig trade in low income settings in Busia District, Kenya. Trop. Vet. 2009;26:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Klich D., Nowicki M., Didkowska A., Bełkot Z., Popczyk B., Wiśniewski J., Anusz K. Predicting the risk of Alaria alata infestation in wild boar on the basis of environmental factors. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2022;17:257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kohler G., Ruitenberg E.J. Comparison of three methods for the detection of Trichinella spiralis infections in pigs by five European laboratories. Bull. World Health Organ. 1974;50:413–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Korpysa-Dzirba W., Różycki M., Bilska-Zając E., Karamon J., Sroka J., Bełcik A., Wasiak M., Cencek T. Alaria alata in terms of risks to consumers' health. Foods. 2021;10:1614. doi: 10.3390/foods10071614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin C.W., Shulok J.R., Kirley S.D., Cincotta L., Foley J.W. Lysosomal localization and mechanism of uptake of Nile blue photosensitizers in tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1991;51:2710–2719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Malone C.J., Oksanen A., Mukaratirwa S., Sharma R., Jenkins E. From wildlife to humans: the global distribution of Trichinella species and genotypes in wildlife and wildlife-associated human trichinellosis. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2024;24 doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.100934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Murrell K.D., Pozio E. Worldwide occurrence and impact of human trichinellosis, 1986–2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011;17:2194–2202. doi: 10.3201/eid1712.110896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Noeckler K., Pozio E., van der Giessen J., Hill D.E., Gamble H.R. International Commission on Trichinellosis: recommendations on post-harvest control of Trichinella in food animals. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019;14 doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nöckler K., Pozio E., Voigt W.P., Heidrich J. Detection of Trichinella infection in food animals. Vet. Parasitol. 2000;93:335–350. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00350-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pozio E. The impact of globalization and climate change on Trichinella spp. epidemiology. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022;27 doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pozio E. Trichinella and trichinellosis in Europe. Vet. Glas. 2019;73:65–84. [Google Scholar]
  27. Romeis B. Aufl. R. Oldenbourg Verlag; München: 1948. Mikroskopische Technik, 15. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosenthal B.M. Zoonotic Sarcocystis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021;136:151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rostami A., Gamble H.R., Dupouy-Camet J., Khazan H., Bruschi F. Meat sources of infection for outbreaks of human trichinellosis. Food Microbiol. 2017;64:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubiola S., Moré G., Civera T., Hemphill A., Frey C.F., Basso W., Colasanto I., Vercellino D., Fidelio M., Lovisone M., Chiesa F. vol. 34. Food Waterborne Parasitol.; 2024. (Detection of Sarcocystis hominis, Sarcocystis Bovifelis, Sarcocystis cruzi, Sarcocystis hirsuta and Sarcocystis sigmoideus Sp. Nov. in Carcasses Affected by Bovine Eosinophilic Myositis). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wakelin D. Trichinella spiralis: immunity, ecology, and evolution. J. Parasitol. 1993;79:488–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES