Abstract
Purpose of Review
Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), driven by residual lesions and progressive ventricular dysfunction. The heterogeneity of CHD anatomy and physiology often limits the applicability of standard HF therapies. This review aims to summarize contemporary catheter-based strategies used to diagnose, stabilize, and treat HF in patients with CHD across both acute and chronic clinical settings, and to evaluate their role in improving outcomes and delaying surgical or transplant-based therapies.
Recent Findings
Recent advances in transcatheter technology have expanded therapeutic options for HF in CHD. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring and implantable sensors enable more precise assessment and remote management of complex circulations. Short-term mechanical circulatory support systems, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous ventricular assist devices, are increasingly used as bridges to recovery or transplantation. Catheter-based closure of shunts (e.g., atrial or ventricular septal defects and patent ductus arteriosus) and creation of controlled shunts using devices such as atrial flow regulators provide strategies to optimize hemodynamics. Transcatheter valve therapies, including pulmonary valve implantation and atrioventricular valve repair, have become important alternatives to repeat surgery. In patients with failing Fontan circulation, interventions such as fenestration creation, pathway stenting, collateral embolization, and emerging lymphatic procedures have demonstrated promising clinical benefits.
Summary
Percutaneous interventions have become central to the management of HF in CHD, offering minimally invasive, anatomy-specific approaches that can stabilize acute decompensation, address residual lesions, and palliate chronic circulatory failure. These strategies enable individualized treatment pathways and may delay or reduce the need for surgical reintervention or transplantation. Continued technological innovation, improved patient selection, and multidisciplinary expertise will be essential to further refine these approaches.
Keywords: Congenital heart disease, Heart failure, Invasive monitoring, Percutaneous interventions, Mechanical circulatory support, Fontan circulation
Introduction
Congenital heart disease (CHD) survivors represent a rapidly growing population, many of whom will develop heart failure (HF) over time due to their residual lesions, prior surgical interventions, or progressive myocardial dysfunction. The rate of hospitalisation for patients with CHD is twice that of the general population, with 50% of patients being hospitalized and 16% requiring intensive care [1, 2]. Although only around 7% of hospitalisations are due to HF, [1] it represents the leading cause of death among CHD patients [3, 4]. The underlying anatomical and physiological heterogeneity, particularly in patients with complex or palliated CHD such as Fontan circulation or systemic right ventricles, complicates standard HF management. Recent advances in percutaneous interventions have transformed the therapeutic landscape for acute and chronic HF in CHD patients by offering less invasive, adaptable strategies that stabilize patients, improve hemodynamics, and delay or avoid the need for surgery or transplantation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of catheter-based strategies across the continuum of HF in CHD, including invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical circulatory support, closure and creation of shunts, valve interventions, and novel approaches for failing Fontan physiology. Additionally, the review highlights the indications, techniques, and outcomes of these therapies in the growing population of patients with CHD and HF.
Acute Heart Failure in Congenital Heart Disease
Acute heart failure (AHF) is a complex clinical syndrome characterized by the sudden onset or worsening of HF signs and symptoms, requiring urgent medical attention. In patients with CHD, AHF can be precipitated by structural deterioration, arrhythmias, residual shunts, or elevated pulmonary arterial pressures. Accurate and timely hemodynamic assessment is essential for the effective management of AHF in patients with CHD, as assessment can be particularly challenging in this population due to complex anatomies and variable pathophysiology [5, 6]. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring informs therapeutic decisions and facilitates rapid stabilization [7]. It also provides the basis for decisions regarding the need for mechanical circulatory support or urgent catheter-based interventions [8].
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Acute Heart Failure
AHF arises from a multifactorial process involving myocardial dysfunction, volume overload, and neurohormonal activation. Clinical examination and ultrasound often fall short in defining the precise hemodynamic profile needed for individualized therapy [8]. Invasive monitoring offers direct assessment of intracardiac pressures, cardiac output, and vascular resistances, guiding tailored interventions, particularly in complex congenital heart disease or challenging postoperative settings where non-invasive data may be inconclusive [8, 9].
Common Invasive Monitoring Techniques
Right and left heart catheterization remain the definitive tools for hemodynamic assessment in AHF and complex CHD. Right heart catheterization (RHC) provides evaluation of volume status, pulmonary artery pressures, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), whilst left heart catheterization (LHC) is useful for assessing systemic ventricular pressures, outflow tract obstruction, or coronary arterial abnormalities [9]. Combined RHC and LHC offer comprehensive mapping of systemic and pulmonary circulations, vital in CHD with systemic right ventricles, single ventricles, or significant shunt lesions [8, 9].
Pulmonary Artery Catheter
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC, or Swan-Ganz) allows continuous monitoring of filling pressures, cardiac output, and mixed venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂). In CHD, PAC is primarily used during diagnostic or interventional catheterization, particularly when non-invasive methods are insufficient for evaluating PVR and shunt physiology [9, 10]. It plays a pivotal role in managing refractory AHF, especially when initiating mechanical circulatory support such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventricular assist devices (VAD). Routine PAC use remains controversial; even in adult patients with HF, the ESCAPE trial demonstrated no survival benefit, [11] and robust pediatric data remain lacking.
Central Venous Pressure Monitoring
Central venous pressure (CVP), measured via a central line, reflects right atrial pressure and provides a rough estimate of intravascular volume. Its clinical value increases when paired with dynamic indices or ScvO₂, offering indirect insight into global perfusion and oxygen balance [12].
Invasive Systemic Arterial Pressure Monitoring
Invasive arterial lines enable continuous systemic blood pressure monitoring, essential for titrating vasoactive medications, guiding mechanical circulatory support, and performing frequent arterial blood gas analyses in intensive care unit (ICU) or catheterization settings. However, there is a growing tendency to favor non-invasive alternatives to reduce the risk of vascular complications associated with arterial cannulation [13, 14].
Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring
Techniques such as Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) which combines transpulmonary thermodilution with pulse contour analysis, and thoracic bioimpedance offer less invasive alternatives but have limited validation in CHD, especially in the presence of intracardiac shunts [15].
Clinical Utility
Invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves diagnosis by distinguishing cardiogenic shock, detecting pulmonary hypertension, and clarifying etiology. Continuous assessment of systemic arterial pressures and cardiac output supports real-time treatment adjustment and decisions on escalation or de-escalation of care [8, 16]. However, procedural risks limit its use to selected intensive care patients, particularly in pediatric and congenital heart disease populations, where non-invasive approaches are increasingly preferred [17, 18].
Invasive Mechanical Circulatory Support (ECMO, Impella, Venting Strategies)
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS), particularly short-term percutaneous options, has emerged as a critical therapeutic bridge in this population - serving roles from stabilization to decision-making, recovery, or transition to durable support or transplantation and in some cases also as chronic or “destination” therapy [19–21]. The 2022 registry report from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) shows that more than a third of recipients of transplants for CHD were supported by MCS, reflecting its increasing use [22].
Short-term Support
ECMO in Congenital Heart Disease
Veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) remains the most widely utilized short-term MCS in CHD populations [19]. Its utility spans acute decompensation, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) [19]. Early initiation (within six hours) is linked to better outcomes [23, 24], though complications such as bleeding, thrombosis, stroke, and infection remain common [25, 26]. Cannula placement in CHD can be challenging, and unique problems such as steal from the systemic circulation by Blalock–Taussig shunts or aortopulmonary collaterals can limit full cardiac unloading.
The Impella® Device
The Impella® (Abiomed, MA, USA) is a percutaneous catheter-mounted micro-axial pump that provides partial circulatory support by unloading the left ventricle. Impella use in CHD is limited by anatomical and size constraints, but it has shown feasibility in selected larger children and adolescents with systemic left ventricular dysfunction [27, 28]. Right-sided mechanical circulatory support systems are not used as much, the applications of the Impella RP®, have been reported in cases such as Ebstein anomaly [29].
Combined use of Impella and ECMO (“ECMELLA”) can mitigate ECMO-induced afterload, thus improving pulmonary congestion and facilitating myocardial recovery but carries increased risks of vascular injury, device migration, hemolysis, and thromboembolism [30, 31].
Venting Strategies During ECMO
Left ventricular distension during VA-ECMO is associated with worse outcomes and may require venting [30]. Venting options include passive strategies, such as atrial septostomy (percutaneous or surgical), implantation of Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) devices to decompress the left atrium and active strategies, such as left atrial or LV cannulation, either surgically or via transseptal approach and Impella-assisted unloading in ECMELLA configurations [30, 32]. Indications include persistent pulmonary edema, elevated filling pressures, absent aortic valve opening, or intracardiac stasis [30].
Durable Support Options
Durable ventricular assist devices are increasingly used in CHD as bridges to transplantation, with outcomes approaching those of non-CHD patients when implanted in experienced centers [33]. However, patients with systemic right ventricles or Fontan circulation present unique technical and physiological challenges, underscoring the need for individualized strategies [13, 34–38].
Chronic Heart Failure
Chronic HF (CHF) is becoming more common among patients with CHD due to improved survival rates and the long-term effects of anatomical and physiological changes. This condition can present as systemic right ventricular failure, sub-pulmonary or single ventricle dysfunction, valve regurgitation, or Fontan-associated circulatory failure. Unlike acquired cardiomyopathies, standard HF therapies can vary in effectiveness, necessitating an individualized, anatomy-specific approach. Symptoms such as exercise intolerance, edema, and hepatic congestion may develop insidiously and often require detailed imaging and hemodynamic assessment for interpretation. New strategies, including remote monitoring, transcatheter valve and shunt interventions, and lymphatic therapy for Fontan insufficiency, offer new opportunities to delay disease progression. Long-term care in specialized centers is essential for optimizing outcomes in this heterogeneous and vulnerable patient population.
Invasive Monitoring of Chronic Heart Failure (Cardiomems)
The CardioMEMS HF System® (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA), a wireless pulmonary artery pressure sensor, is approved for use in adults with HF and has been applied off-label in selected CHD populations [39].
Possible indications for invasive monitoring of device implantation are single ventricle patients palliated with Fontan circulation, patients with d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) after atrial switch, ccTGA and a borderline systemic ventricle. Continuous pressure data provide insight into daily life hemodynamics, avoiding confounding effects of anesthesia, mechanical ventilation, or fasting associated with catheterization [40–43]. Remote monitoring may be particularly valuable for patients living far from specialized centers.
Evidence for reduction in HF hospitalizations or mortality in CHD remains limited and inconsistent [41]. Reduced adherence to data transmission has been a major limiting factor [43, 44]. Additionally, sensor recalibration during follow-up has been required more frequently in CHD than in acquired HF, with reported pressure discrepancies of several mmHg [41, 45].
Procedural challenges arise from complex native or post-surgical anatomy, especially in Fontan patients, in whom long sheaths and prior pulmonary artery stents may complicate device placement. Reported complications include device migration, embolization, and pulmonary artery distortion [41, 45]. Thromboembolic risk appears low but may be increased in Fontan physiology, necessitating careful anticoagulation management [41, 45].
Despite these limitations, CardioMEMS may reduce the need for surveillance catheterization and allow remote titration of medical therapy in carefully selected patients. Optimization of patient education, caregiver involvement, and multidisciplinary monitoring may enhance adherence and maximize potential benefit [46].
Shunt Closure Procedures for HF (ASD, SVASD, VSD, PDA, Fistulas)
Shunt lesions, including atrial septal defects (ASDs), ventricular septal defects (VSDs), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and arteriovenous fistulas impose chronic volume overload, chamber dilation, pulmonary hypertension, and eventual HF. Percutaneous closure has become the preferred approach for most of these lesions [47].
Atrial Septal Defect Closure
ASD closure is indicated when significant left-to-right shunting results in right heart volume overload [48]. Elective closure is recommended between the ages of three and five [48]. Although ASDs are usually asymptomatic in childhood, some infants may present with HF, respiratory distress, or failure to thrive, which warrants earlier intervention. In adults, age-related changes, such as reduced left ventricular compliance, can exacerbate shunting and make ASDs symptomatic later in life [48–50]. In older patients or those with diastolic dysfunction, closure must be approached cautiously, as elimination of the shunt may precipitate pulmonary edema [51]. Balloon test occlusion and fenestrated devices may help identify and mitigate this risk [52, 53].
Transcatheter ASD closure, introduced in 1974 and revolutionized by the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO), is now standard practice [54, 55]. Selection of occluder devices depends on the defect size, its location and rim adequacy, with self-centering occluders generally favored for most cases, whilst non-self-centering devices are being used for small or eccentrically located defects [56, 57].
Superior Sinus Venosus Defect Closure
Superior sinus venosus ASDs are typically associated with partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage of the right upper pulmonary vein into the SVC or the right atrium [58]. Due to the complexity of the anatomy, surgical repair has traditionally been the standard treatment.
In 2014, a novel transcatheter technique using a covered stent in the SVC to redirect pulmonary venous return emerged as a viable option in selected cases [59, 60]. Careful patient selection, aided by multimodality imaging and superior vena cava (SVC) balloon interrogation, is essential for procedural success [61–65].
Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
Ventricular septal defects (VSD) closure is indicated for hemodynamically significant defects with acceptable pulmonary vascular resistance [66, 67]. Muscular and selected perimembranous VSDs are amenable to percutaneous closure, though the latter carry a higher risk of heart block [68, 69]. Device embolization, valvular regurgitation, and arrhythmias are rare but recognized complications that have decreased with improved technology and techniques [70, 71].
Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure is indicated in symptomatic patients with left heart overload and is routinely performed using occluder devices or coils, even in small infants [58, 72, 73]. Devices such as the Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADO) and its variants (ADO II, ADO II AS), which offer versatility to accommodate different duct morphologies and patient size and can be used in small infants under echocardiographic guidance [74–76]. Coils may occasionally be used for small PDAs [77]. Potential complications include device embolization, hemolysis, stenosis of the left pulmonary artery and vascular obstruction, especially in small infants [77, 78].
Fistulas
Coronary-cameral fistula, most often involving the right coronary artery and the right atrium or ventricle and occasionally the pulmonary artery warrant intervention with significant left-to-right shunting, evidence of myocardial ischemia or progressive enlargement [79]. Transcatheter closure is first-line in suitable patients, with surgery reserved for infants or complex anatomies [80].
Systemic arteriovenous fistulas can lead to high-output cardiac states with right heart volume overload, with the preferred treatment being embolization, using coils, liquid agents such as Onyx, focal vessel occlusion for major aortopulmonary collaterals or surgical techniques, depending on lesion complexity [81].
Creation of Shunts for Heart Failure (Fenestrated Atrial Devices, Transcatheter Potts shunt, Enlargement of restrictive ASD, Enlargement of VSD)
In selected patients with advanced HF, controlled shunt creation may provide hemodynamic benefits by decompressing high-pressure chambers or improving preload. Techniques include atrial septostomy, implantation of fenestrated atrial devices, and creation of systemic-to-pulmonary shunts.
The Atrial Flow Regulator
The Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) (Occlutech Holding AG, Schaffhausen, Switzerland) is a self-expandable fenestrated device designed to create a calibrated interatrial shunt. Although approved for HF with preserved or reduced ejection fraction [82, 83], it has been used off-label in CHD, pulmonary hypertension, as a venting strategy during ECMO in children with end-stage cardiomyopathies and is considered effective and safe in creating a stable fenestration in Fontan circulation [32, 42, 84–89].
The device offers predictable fenestration size, high patency rates, and technical feasibility even in small children [42, 85]. In mid-term follow-up, patency is high (~ 91%), with minimal thromboembolic complications, even in right-to-left shunt settings [89].
ASD Creation
Percutaneous ASD creation or enlargement is crucial for palliation or as a bridge to definitive therapies in cases of transposition of the great arteries, and restrictive atrial septum in tricuspid atresia or hypoplastic left heart syndrome [9, 90, 91]. Techniques include the Rashkind balloon atrial septostomy, static balloon dilation, blade septostomy, radiofrequency perforation, atrial septal stenting or AFR implantation, depending on anatomy and age [9].
Transcatheter Creation of Potts Shunt
The transcatheter Potts shunt recreates a surgical anastomosis between the left pulmonary artery and descending aorta and is used as palliation in refractory suprasystemic pulmonary arterial hypertension [92, 93]. Early reports show improvement in functional class and right ventricular unloading, but procedural risks and high reintervention rates limit widespread use [93–95]. Long-term durability remains a challenge [96]. Despite its limitations, the transcatheter Potts shunt marks a significant advance in palliative care for patients who are not eligible for surgical shunt creation.
Percutaneous Valve Interventions for Heart Failure
Valvar dysfunction is a major contributor to HF in CHD [47]. Percutaneous valve interventions offer effective alternatives to surgery, particularly in high-risk patients or those requiring repeat interventions [97].
Pulmonary Valve Interventions
Balloon Pulmonary Valvuloplasty(BPV) remains the first-line treatment for isolated congenital pulmonary valve stenosis in all age groups [47, 98], providing durable relief of obstruction and low reintervention rates [99, 100]. A balloon-to-annulus ratio of 1.2 to 1.25 is considered more effective than larger ratios, achieving comparable gradient reductions whilst reducing the incidence of pulmonary regurgitation [101, 102].
Since its introduction in 2000 [103], balloon-expandable Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement(tPVR) has become the standard alternative to surgical valve replacement in dysfunctional conduits or bioprosthetic valves [104], and is increasingly applied in post-transannular patch anatomies using larger self-expanding valves [105–107]. The advantages of tPVR include a reduced need for surgical reintervention and improved hemodynamics, however, the risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis remains a major concern [108].
Aortic Valve Interventions
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the preferred initial intervention for congenital aortic stenosis, particularly in neonates and children [109]. Although effective acutely, progressive aortic regurgitation often necessitates later surgical valve replacement [110]. Whilst BAV remains the preferred initial treatment due to its less invasive nature, recent data suggest that surgical valvotomy may reduce the need for reintervention, especially if tri-leaflet valve morphology can be achieved following repair [111].
Although Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(TAVR) has been extensively studied in adults with calcific AS [112], its use in children and patients with CHD is limited by anatomical challenges and the prevalence of aortic regurgitation or mixed valve disease [113]. Early case reports and small case series have demonstrated the off-label use of modified devices, such as the Melody and Sapien and other valves, in selected patients with CHD [114, 115
Atrioventricular Valve Interventions
Atrioventricular (AV) valve regurgitation significantly contributes to HF, particularly in patients with systemic right ventricles and Fontan circulation. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) techniques such as the MitraClip™ (Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA) and Valve-in-Valve Procedures in failing bioprosthetic AV valves have been performed in selected high-risk patients and have demonstrated symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement [116, 117,118 These interventions require meticulous planning and multidisciplinary expertise.
Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting of Coarctation of the Aorta
Coarctation of the aorta increases ventricular afterload, which can ultimately result in HF [119]. Management options include surgical repair, balloon angioplasty, and stent implantation, with choice guided by patient age, anatomy, and prior interventions [120].
Balloon Angioplasty is widely accepted for recoarctation and for native coarctation in infants and small children, particularly when vessel size limits stent placement [121]. Whilst effective, balloon angioplasty is associated with higher rates of elastic recoil, restenosis, and vascular injury, especially in older patients [122].
Endovascular Stenting has become first-line therapy for coarctation in adolescents and adults, offering superior gradient reduction and lower rates of restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty alone [119, 121]. Both covered and bare-metal stents demonstrate similar efficacy, with covered stents preferred when there is concern for vessel injury [121]. Advances in stent technology have enabled treatment in increasingly smaller patients, including as a bridge to definitive surgery in neonates [123].
Successful intervention is defined by reduction of the gradient across coarctation to less than 10 mmHg, which is associated with improved long-term outcomes [124]. Lifelong surveillance is required to monitor for restenosis, aneurysm formation, and systemic hypertension.
Transcatheter Interventions in the Failing Fontan Circulation
Fontan failure is characterized by systemic venous congestion, low cardiac output, and lymphatic dysfunction leading to exercise intolerance, and multi-organ complications [125, 126]. Transcatheter interventions are central to the management and aim to optimize circuit geometry, reduce venous pressures, and palliate symptoms. Transcatheter interventions have emerged as critical tools to preserve function, palliate symptoms, and delay the need for transplant [126, 127].
Fenestration and Transcatheter Offloading in the Failing Fontan
Transcatheter Offloading in the Failing Fontan provides a controlled right-to-left shunt that lowers central venous pressure and improves preload [125–127]. Techniques vary by Fontan type and include transseptal puncture, radiofrequency perforation combined with stent implantation, and off-label use of the fenestrated AFR device [89, 128, 129]. Whilst effective, these interventions carry a risk of thrombosis and require long-term antithrombotic therapy and surveillance [89, 128, 130].
Embolization of Aortopulmonary and Veno-venous Collaterals
Embolization of Aortopulmonary Collaterals reduces ventricular volume overload, whilst Embolization of Veno-Venous Collaterals may improve oxygenation in selected patients [125, 126, 131, 132]. Hemodynamic assessment is essential, as indiscriminate closure may worsen Fontan pressures. Nevertheless, embolization with microcoils and vascular plugs, often yields immediate improvements, but high rates of collateral recurrence demand long-term surveillance [125, 126].
Fontan Conduit and Pathway Stenting
Stenting of stenotic Fontan pathways has become a vital method to restore conduit patency and improve hemodynamic [133]. Balloon-expandable covered stents are the primary choice for treating stenoses at key sites, including the extracardiac conduit, pulmonary arteries, and veno-atrial junctions [126, 127]. Immediate results consistently show marked pressure gradient reduction and improved cardiac output, often resulting in symptomatic improvement. 133–135 In pediatric patients, somatic growth demands staged redilation [133]. Nonetheless, restenosis from neointimal proliferation and stent fractures remain significant long-term challenges [136]. Advanced imaging modalities, such as high-resolution MRI and 3D rotational angiography, combined with computational fluid dynamics, are transforming procedural planning [137, 138]. Bioresorbable scaffolds and drug-eluting stents hold promise in reducing restenosis rates but currently lack the necessary diameters and radial force required for Fontan circuit applications [139].
Emerging Transcatheter Therapies and Future Perspectives
Emerging Lymphatic Interventions, including thoracic duct embolization and decompression techniques, have shown promise in treating protein-losing enteropathy and plastic bronchitis [140, 141]. One such technique, the innominate vein turn-down, creates a direct connection to the atrium, facilitating decompression and improving lymphatic flow in selected patients with failing Fontan physiology [142]. These therapies represent an important advance but should be performed in highly specialized centers.
Transcatheter Edge-to‐Edge Repair (TEER) for AV valve regurgitation, is emerging as a viable adjunct in managing Fontan failure, though currently, only small case series are available [118].
Conclusions
Percutaneous interventions have become increasingly integral to the management of HF in patients with CHD, offering minimally invasive, lesion-specific solutions across the spectrum of acute and chronic presentations (Fig. 1). In acute decompensation, invasive hemodynamic monitoring guides decision-making, whilst short-term mechanical support systems, such as ECMO and percutaneous ventricular assist devices serve as critical bridges to recovery or transplant. Chronic management strategies include remote pressure monitoring with CardioMEMS and fenestration devices such as the AFR, tailored to unload systemic or pulmonary circulations. Closure of hemodynamically significant shunts (ASD, VSD, PDA) reduces volume overload, whilst percutaneous valve implantation and repair offer durable options for valvar dysfunction. In the failing Fontan circulation, catheter-based fenestration, stenting, collateral embolization, and emerging lymphatic interventions have shown promise in alleviating symptoms and prolonging survival. As procedural techniques and device platforms continue to evolve and expertise deepens, percutaneous strategies for HF in CHD will continue to grow under longitudinal surveillance.
Fig. 1.
Percutaneous strategies are applied across the spectrum of acute and chronic heart failure in congenital heart disease, including invasive monitoring, mechanical support, shunt manipulation, valve and vascular interventions, and Fontan-specific therapies
Key References
-
Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA, Sivakumar K, et al. Covered Stent Correction for Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defects, an Emerging Alternative to Surgical Repair: Results of an International Registry. Circulation. 2025;151(11):744–756. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.124.070271.
This international registry provides important contemporary evidence supporting transcatheter techniques for the correction of superior sinus venosus atrial septal defects. The study demonstrates high procedural success and favorable safety outcomes, highlighting a minimally invasive alternative to surgical repair in selected patients.
-
Goldstein BH, McElhinney DB, Gillespie MJ, et al. Early Outcomes From a Multicenter Transcatheter Self-Expanding Pulmonary Valve Replacement Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(14):1310–1321.
This multicenter registry reports early outcomes with newer self-expanding transcatheter pulmonary valve systems. The findings support the growing role of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement as an effective alternative to repeat surgery in patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction related to congenital heart disease.
-
Flores-Umanzor E, Luna-López R, Cepas-Guillen P, et al. Transcatheter Interventions in Adults With Fontan Palliation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17(12):e014699. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.124.014699.
This contemporary review outlines the expanding role of transcatheter interventions in adults with Fontan circulation, including fenestration creation, pathway stenting, and collateral embolization. It provides important insight into catheter-based strategies aimed at improving hemodynamics and delaying advanced heart failure therapies in this complex population.
Abbreviations
- AA
Ascending Aorta
- ACC
American College of Cardiology
- ACTION
Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network
- ADO
Amplatzer Duct Occluder
- AFR
Atrial Flow Regulator
- AHA
American Heart Association
- AHF
Acute Heart Failure
- APC
Aortopulmonary Collateral
- ASD
Atrial Septal Defect
- ASO
Amplatzer Septal Occluder
- AV
Atrioventricular
- AVVR
Atrioventricular Valve Regurgitation
- BAV
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty
- CHD
Congenital Heart Disease
- CHF
Congestive Heart Failure
- CVP
Central Venous Pressure
- ECMO
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- ECPR
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- ESC
European Society of Cardiology
- FDA
Food and Drug Administration
- HF
Heart Failure
- HFSA
Heart Failure Society of America
- HLHS
Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome
- ICU
Intensive Care Unit
- INTERMACS
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support
- ISHLT
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
- LV
Left Ventricle
- LVAD
Left Ventricular Assist Device
- MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- NYHA
New York Heart Association
- PAH
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- PB
Plastic Bronchitis
- PDA
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
- PLE
Protein-Losing Enteropathy
- PS
Pulmonary Stenosis
- PVR
Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
- RV
Right Ventricle
- RVOT
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
- SCAI
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
- SV
Systemic Ventricle
- SVASD
Superior Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defect
- SVC
Superior Vena Cava
- TAVR
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
- TGA
Transposition of the Great Arteries
- TPS
Transcatheter Potts Shunt
- VAD
Ventricular Assist Device
- VSD
Ventricular Septal Defect
- VVC
Venovenous Collateral
Authors’ Contributions
All authors contributed to the drafting, writing and reviewing of this article.
Funding
None.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Verheugt CL, Uiterwaal CS, van der Velde ET, et al. The emerging burden of hospital admissions of adults with congenital heart disease. Heart Jun. 2010;96(11):872–8. 10.1136/hrt.2009.185595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mackie AS, Pilote L, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Marelli AJ. Health care resource utilization in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol Mar. 2007;15(6):839–43. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diller GP, Kempny A, Alonso-Gonzalez R, et al. Survival prospects and circumstances of death in contemporary adult congenital heart disease patients under follow-up at a large tertiary centre. Circulation. 2015;132(22):2118–25. 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu C, Moore BM, Kotchetkova I, Cordina RL, Celermajer DS. Causes of death in a contemporary adult congenital heart disease cohort. Heart Oct. 2018;104(20):1678–82. 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hinton RB, Ware SM. Heart Failure in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. Circ Res Mar. 2017;17(6):978–94. 10.1161/circresaha.116.308996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Van De Bruaene A, Meier L, Droogne W, et al. Management of acute heart failure in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Heart Fail Rev Jan. 2018;23(1):1–14. 10.1007/s10741-017-9664-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sorajja P, Borlaug BA, Dimas V, et al. Executive summary of the SCAI/HFSA clinical expert consensus document on the use of invasive hemodynamics for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Jun. 2017;1(7):1294–9. 10.1002/ccd.27036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haddad RN, Lange JM, Raisky O, et al. Indications and outcomes of cardiac catheterization following congenital heart surgery in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg May. 2022;2(5):1056–65. 10.1093/ejcts/ezac026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Feltes TF, Bacha E, Beekman RH 3rd, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation Jun. 2011;7(22):2607–52. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31821b1f10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stanger P, Heymann MA, Hoffman JI, Rudolph AM. Use of the Swan-Ganz catheter in cardiac catheterization of infants and children. Am Heart J. 1972;83(6):749–54. 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90205-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. Jama Oct. 2005;5(13):1625–33. 10.1001/jama.294.13.1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Amoozgar H, Behniafard N, Borzoee M, Ajami GH. Correlation between peripheral and central venous pressures in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;29(2):281–4. 10.1007/s00246-007-9067-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peng E, O’Sullivan JJ, Griselli M, et al. Durable ventricular assist device support for failing systemic morphologic right ventricle: early results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(6):2122–9. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ricci Z, Brogi J, De Filippis S, Caccavelli R, Morlacchi M, Romagnoli S. Arterial pressure monitoring in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an observational study comparing invasive and non-invasive measurements. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(6):1231–7. 10.1007/s00246-019-02137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pernbro F, Wåhlander H, Romlin B. Haemodynamic monitoring after paediatric cardiac surgery using echocardiography and PiCCO. Cardiol Young. 2024;34(12):2636–40. 10.1017/s1047951124026374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Recco DP, Roy N, Gregory AJ, Lobdell KW. Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery. JTCVS Open. 2022;10:256–63. 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sanders M, Servaas S, Slagt C. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(3):433–60. 10.1007/s10877-019-00330-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cave DG, Bautista MJ, Mustafa K, Bentham JR. Cardiac output monitoring in children: a review. Arch Dis Child. 2023;108(12):949–55. 10.1136/archdischild-2022-325030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.VanderPluym CJ, Cedars A, Eghtesady P, et al. Outcomes following implantation of mechanical circulatory support in adults with congenital heart disease: An analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). J Heart Lung Transplant Jan. 2018;37(1):89–99. 10.1016/j.healun.2017.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown G, Moynihan KM, Deatrick KB, et al. Extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO): guidelines for pediatric cardiac failure. ASAIO J. 2021;67(5):463–75. 10.1097/mat.0000000000001431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lorusso R, Shekar K, MacLaren G, et al. ELSO interim guidelines for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult cardiac patients. ASAIO J. 2021;67(8):827–44. 10.1097/mat.0000000000001510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.https://ishltregistries.org/registries/slides.asp?yearToDisplay=2022
- 23.Bembea MM, Ng DK, Rizkalla N, et al. Outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the get with the guidelines-resuscitation and the extracorporeal life support organization registries. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(4):e278–85. 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lasa JJ, Rogers RS, Localio R, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) during pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest is associated with improved survival to discharge: a report from the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry. Circulation. 2016;133(2):165–76. 10.1161/circulationaha.115.016082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merrill ED, Schoeneberg L, Sandesara P, et al. Outcomes after prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in children with cardiac disease–Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Aug. 2014;148(2):582–8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Almond CS, Singh TP, Gauvreau K, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for bridge to heart transplantation among children in the United States: analysis of data from the organ procurement and transplant network and extracorporeal life support organization registry. Circulation. 2011;123(25):2975–84. 10.1161/circulationaha.110.991505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dimas VV, Murthy R, Guleserian KJ. Utilization of the Impella 2.5 micro-axial pump in children for acute circulatory support. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(2):261–2. 10.1002/ccd.25042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morray BH, Dimas VV, Lim S, et al. Circulatory support using the impella device in Fontan patients with systemic ventricular dysfunction: a multicenter experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(1):118–23. 10.1002/ccd.26885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cabezón G, Stephanenko A, Redondo A, Amat-Santos IJ. Impella RP in Ebstein disease as a bridge to heart transplant. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(6):e57–60. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lüsebrink E, Binzenhöfer L, Kellnar A, et al. Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Res Cardiol Apr. 2023;112(4):464–505. 10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bernhardt AM, Potapov E, Vandenbriele C, Skurk C, Bertoldi LF, Pappalardo F. Differential utilization of Impella devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and combined therapies as escalation and de-escalation strategies. Eur Heart J Suppl Dec. 2023;25(Suppl I):I32–8. 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Piccinelli E, Castro-Verdes MB, Fraisse A, Bautista-Rodriguez C. Implantation of an atrial flow regulator in a child on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator as a bridge to heart transplant: a case report. J Card Fail. 2021;27(3):364–7. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ross HJ, Law Y, Book WM, et al. Transplantation and mechanical circulatory support in congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(8):802–20. 10.1161/cir.0000000000000353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gonzalez-Fernandez O, De Rita F, Coats L, et al. Ventricular assist devices in transposition and failing systemic right ventricle: role of tricuspid valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. 10.1093/ejcts/ezac130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Poh CL, Chiletti R, Zannino D, et al. Ventricular assist device support in patients with single ventricles: the Melbourne experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Aug. 2017;1(2):310–6. 10.1093/icvts/ivx066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arnaoutakis GJ, Blitzer D, Fuller S, et al. Mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation for the failing single ventricle. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):193–7. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Weinstein S, Bello R, Pizarro C, et al. The use of the Berlin Heart EXCOR in patients with functional single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Feb. 2014;147(2):697–704. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.030. discussion 704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karner B, Urganci E, Schlein J, et al. First-in-man use of the EXCOR venous cannula for combined cavopulmonary and systemic ventricular support in Fontan circulation failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022;41(10):1533–6. 10.1016/j.healun.2022.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brugts JJ, Radhoe SP, Clephas PRD, et al. Remote haemodynamic monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with chronic heart failure (MONITOR-HF): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10394):2113–23. 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00923-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bradley EA, Jassal A, Moore-Clingenpeel M, Abraham WT, Berman D, Daniels CJ. Ambulatory Fontan pressure monitoring: results from the implantable hemodynamic monitor Fontan feasibility cohort (IHM-FFC). Int J Cardiol. 2019;284:22–7. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marshall W, Rajpal S, Mah ML, et al. Early experience and lessons learned using implanted hemodynamic monitoring in patients with Fontan circulation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(24):e031836. 10.1161/jaha.123.031836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Piccinelli E, Testa A, Butera G. Versatility of atrial flow regulator device in congenital heart disease: a case series. Pediatr Cardiol. 2024;45(6):1377–83. 10.1007/s00246-023-03123-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bhat DP, Graziano JN, Garn BJ, Franklin WJ. Safety and utility of CardioMEMS device for remote pulmonary artery monitoring in paediatric Fontan patients: a case series. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023;7(9):ytad422. 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Orr WB, Colombo JN, Roberts B, Silva JNA, Balzer D. Incorporation of the CardioMEMS™ system during an exercise physiology test in a pediatric congenital heart disease patient contributing to medical decision-making. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022;43(3):695–9. 10.1007/s00246-021-02758-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salavitabar A, Bradley EA, Chisolm JL, et al. Implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring device in patients with palliated congenital heart disease: Technical considerations and procedural outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Feb. 2020;95(2):270–9. 10.1002/ccd.28528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Piccinelli E, Grutter G, Pilati M, et al. Use of the CardioMEMS device in children and patients with congenital heart disease: a literature review. J Clin Med. 2024. 10.3390/jcm13144234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(6):563–645. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Torres AJ. Hemodynamic assessment of atrial septal defects. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(24):2882–9. 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McMahon CJ, Feltes TF, Fraley JK, et al. Natural history of growth of secundum atrial septal defects and implications for transcatheter closure. Heart Mar. 2002;87(3):256–9. 10.1136/heart.87.3.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rao PS, Harris AD. Recent advances in managing septal defects: ventricular septal defects and atrioventricular septal defects. F1000Res. 2018. 10.12688/f1000research.14102.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Booth DC, Wisenbaugh T, Smith M, DeMaria AN. Left ventricular distensibility and passive elastic stiffness in atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(5):1231–6. 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92605-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tadros VX, Asgar AW. Atrial septal defect closure with left ventricular dysfunction. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(X):X13-x17. 10.4244/eijv12sxa3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Abdelkarim A, Levi DS, Tran B, Ghobrial J, Aboulhosn J. Fenestrated Transcatheter ASD Closure in Adults with Diastolic Dysfunction and/or Pulmonary Hypertension: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Congenit Heart Dis. 2016;11(6):663–71. 10.1111/chd.12367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.King TD, Mills NL. Nonoperative closure of atrial septal defects. Surgery. 1974;75(3):383–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Masura J, Gavora P, Formanek A, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the new self-centering amplatzer septal occluder: initial human experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;42(4):388–93. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 56.Lee PH, Park DW. A novel closure device for atrial septal defect: Much more to learn and experience. Int J Cardiol. 2021;331:88–9. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Santoro G, Castaldi B, Cuman M, et al. Trans-catheter atrial septal defect closure with the new GORE® Cardioform ASD occluder: First European experience. Int J Cardiol Mar. 2021;15:327:68–73. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 2002;19(12):1890–900. 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Garg G, Tyagi H, Radha AS. Transcatheter closure of sinus venosus atrial septal defect with anomalous drainage of right upper pulmonary vein into superior vena cava–an innovative technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(3):473–7. 10.1002/ccd.25502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baruteau AE, Hascoet S, Malekzadeh-Milani S, et al. Transcatheter Closure of Superior Sinus Venosus Defects. JACC Cardiovasc Interv Nov. 2023;13(21):2587–99. 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hansen JH, Duong P, Jivanji SGM, et al. Transcatheter Correction of Superior Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defects as an Alternative to Surgical Treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 2020;24(11):1266–78. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA, Jones M, et al. Correction of sinus venosus atrial septal defects with the 10 zig covered Cheatham-platinum stent - An international registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Jul. 2021;1(1):128–36. 10.1002/ccd.29750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sivakumar K, Qureshi S, Pavithran S, Vaidyanathan S, Rajendran M. Simple diagnostic tools may guide transcatheter closure of superior sinus venosus defects without advanced imaging techniques. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(12):e009833. 10.1161/circinterventions.120.009833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hejazi Y, Hijazi ZM, Saloos HA, Ibrahim H, Mann GS, Boudjemline Y. Novel technique for transcatheter closure of sinus venosus atrial septal defect: the temporary suture-holding technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(6):1068–77. 10.1002/ccd.30415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.c.
- 66.Levin AR, Jarmakani MM, Spach MS, et al. Ventricular intracradiac shunting mechanisms in congenital heart disease. UCLA Forum Med Sci. 1970;10:247–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fried R, Falkovsky G, Newburger J, et al. Pulmonary arterial changes in patients with ventricular septal defects and severe pulmonary hypertension. Pediatr Cardiol. 1986;7(3):147–54. 10.1007/bf02424988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Amin Z, Gu X, Berry JM, et al. New device for closure of muscular ventricular septal defects in a canine model. Circulation Jul. 1999;20(3):320–8. 10.1161/01.cir.100.3.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yang L, Tai BC, Khin LW, Quek SC. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of transcatheter device closure of ventricular septal defects (VSD). J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(3):260–72. 10.1111/joic.12121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jortveit J, Leirgul E, Eskedal L, et al. Mortality and complications in 3495 children with isolated ventricular septal defects. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(9):808–13. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Carminati M, Butera G, Chessa M, et al. Transcatheter closure of congenital ventricular septal defects: results of the European Registry. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(19):2361–8. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schneider DJ, Moore JW. Patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation. 2006;114(17):1873–82. 10.1161/circulationaha.105.592063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Baruteau AE, Méot M, Benbrik N, et al. Device closure of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants. JACC: Advances. 2024;3(10):101211. 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Philip R, Waller BR 3rd, Agrawal V, et al. Morphologic characterization of the patent ductus arteriosus in the premature infant and the choice of transcatheter occlusion device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(2):310–7. 10.1002/ccd.26287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bessinger FB Jr., Blieden LC, Edwards JE. Hypertensive pulmonary vascular disease associated with patent ductus arteriosus. Primary or secondary? Circulation. 1975;52(1):157–61. 10.1161/01.cir.52.1.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Krichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, Möes CA, McLaughlin P, Freedom RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1989;1(12):877–80. 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Backes CH, Rivera BK, Bridge JA, et al. Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) closure during infancy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2017. 10.1542/peds.2016-2927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sathanandam S, Gutfinger D, Morray B, et al. Consensus guidelines for the prevention and management of periprocedural complications of transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure with the Amplatzer Piccolo occluder in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021;42(6):1258–74. 10.1007/s00246-021-02665-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Carminati M, Giugno L, Chessa M, Butera G, Piazza L, Bussadori C. Coronary-cameral fistulas: indications and methods for closure. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(X):X28-x30. 10.4244/eijv12sxa6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Latson LA. Coronary artery fistulas: how to manage them. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70(1):110–6. 10.1002/ccd.21125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Musmar B, Roy JM, Orscelik A, et al. Comparative outcomes of endovascular vs. surgical treatment in craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci Mar. 2025;15:470:123402. 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Shah SJ, Borlaug BA, Chung ES, et al. Atrial shunt device for heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF II): a randomised, multicentre, blinded, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Mar. 2022;19(10330):1130–40. 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Paitazoglou C, Bergmann MW, Özdemir R, et al. One-year results of the first-in-man study investigating the Atrial Flow Regulator for left atrial shunting in symptomatic heart failure patients: the PRELIEVE study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(5):800–10. 10.1002/ejhf.2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Manuri L, Calaciura RE, De Zorzi A, et al. Atrial flow regulator for failing Fontan circulation: an initial European experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(5):761–4. 10.1093/icvts/ivy165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bautista-Rodriguez C, Hascoët S, Fraisse A. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Atrial Flow Regulator in children under 10 kg. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. 10.1002/ccd.30536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hansmann G, Sabiniewicz A, Sabiniewicz R. Atrial flow regulator for postcapillary pulmonary hypertension: first-in-human transcatheter AFR device implantations in RCM. JACC Case Rep. 2022;4(14):878–84. 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pascall E, Jones MI, Savis A, Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA. Transcatheter creation of a pulmonary artery to left atrial fenestration in a failing Fontan circulation using the Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR). Cardiol Young. 2021;31(8):1376–9. 10.1017/s1047951121000731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lehner A, Schulze-Neick I, Haas NA. Creation of a defined and stable Fontan fenestration with the new Occlutech Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR®). Cardiol Young. 2018;28(8):1062–6. 10.1017/s1047951118000720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Butera G, Piccinelli E, Kolesnik A, et al. Implantation of atrial flow regulator devices in patients with congenital heart disease and children with severe pulmonary hypertension or cardiomyopathy-an international multicenter case series. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1332395. 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1332395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Giordano M, Santoro G, Agnoletti G, et al. Interventional cardiac catheterization in neonatal age: results in a multicentre Italian experience. Int J Cardiol Sep 1. 2020;314:36–42. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pedra CA, Neves JR, Pedra SR, et al. New transcatheter techniques for creation or enlargement of atrial septal defects in infants with complex congenital heart disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Nov. 2007;1(5):731–9. 10.1002/ccd.21260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sandoval J, Gomez-Arroyo J, Gaspar J, Pulido-Zamudio T. Interventional and surgical therapeutic strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: beyond palliative treatments. J Cardiol. 2015;66(4):304–14. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Schranz D, Kerst G, Menges T, et al. Transcatheter creation of a reverse Potts shunt in a patient with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with Moyamoya syndrome. EuroIntervention May. 2015;11(1):121. 10.4244/eijv11i1a21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Boudjemline Y, Sizarov A, Malekzadeh-Milani S, et al. Safety and Feasibility of the Transcatheter Approach to Create a Reverse Potts Shunt in Children With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Can J Cardiol Sep. 2017;33(9):1188–96. 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Anderson JH, Cabalka AK, Frantz RP, Cajigas HR, Taggart NW. Transcatheter nonductal reverse Potts shunt creation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(1):e011315. 10.1161/circinterventions.121.011315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Haddad RN, Levy M, Szezepanski I, Malekzadeh-Milani S, Bonnet D. Long-term outcomes of transcatheter Potts shunt in children with suprasystemic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1028304. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1028304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Brida M, Diller GP, Nashat H, et al. Cardiac catheter intervention complexity and safety outcomes in adult congenital heart disease. Heart Sep. 2020;106(18):1432–7. 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol Apr. 2019;2(12):e81–192. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hansen RL, Naimi I, Wang H, et al. Long-term outcomes up to 25 years following balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: A multicenter study. Congenit Heart Dis Nov. 2019;14(6):1037–45. 10.1111/chd.12788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Devanagondi R, Peck D, Sagi J, et al. Long-term outcomes of balloon valvuloplasty for isolated pulmonary valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(2):247–54. 10.1007/s00246-016-1506-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pathak SJ, Pockett CR, Moore JW, El-Said HG. Effect of balloon:annulus ratio on incidence of pulmonary insufficiency following valvuloplasty. Congenit Heart Dis. 2016;11(5):415–9. 10.1111/chd.12327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Rao PS. Percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: state of the art. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(5):747–63. 10.1002/ccd.20982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Qureshi SA, et al. Percutaneous insertion of the pulmonary valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 2002;15(10):1664–9. 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01822-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.McElhinney DB, Zhang Y, Levi DS, et al. Reintervention and Survival After Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 2022;4(1):18–32. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.031. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Qureshi SA, Jones MI, Pushparajah K, et al. Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation Using Self-Expandable Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve System: 3-Year CE Study Results. JACC Cardiovasc Interv Apr. 2025;28(8):1045–56. 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Goldstein BH, McElhinney DB, Gillespie MJ, et al. Early Outcomes From a Multicenter Transcatheter Self-Expanding Pulmonary Valve Replacement Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 2024;9(14):1310–21. 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dimas VV, Babaliaros V, Kim D, et al. Multicenter pivotal study of the Alterra Adaptive Prestent for the treatment of pulmonary regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17(19):2287–97. 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Egbe AC, Salama AA, Miranda WR, et al. Right Heart Reverse Remodeling and Prosthetic Valve Function After Transcatheter vs Surgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv Jan. 2024;22(2):248–58. 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Boe BA, Zampi JD, Kennedy KF, et al. Acute Success of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in the Current Era: A National Cardiovascular Data Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv Sep. 2017;11(17):1717–26. 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Maskatia SA, Ing FF, Justino H, et al. Twenty-five year experience with balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(7):1024–8. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Vergnat M, Asfour B, Arenz C, et al. Aortic stenosis of the neonate: A single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Jan. 2019;157(1):318–e3261. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Corrigendum to. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J Jun. 2022;1(21):2022. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Yoon SH, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 2017;5(22):2752–63. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sinha S, Khan A, Qureshi AM, et al. Application of transcatheter valves for aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: A case series. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Feb. 2020;95(2):253–61. 10.1002/ccd.28505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sharew B, Bakhtadze B, Das T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in congenital heart disease. JACC: Case Reports. 2024;29(4):102199. 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.102199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Schamroth Pravda N, Vaknin Assa H, Sondergaard L, et al. Transcatheter Interventions for Atrioventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Adult Congenital Heart Disease: An International Case Series. Article. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):521. 10.3390/jcm12020521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Jolley MA, Sulentic A, Amin S, et al. Introduction of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with congenital heart disease at a children’s hospital. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Feb. 2024;103(2):326–34. 10.1002/ccd.30935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Guerin P, Jalal Z, Le Ruz R, et al. Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair for systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation in patients with congenital heart disease: the first descriptive cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(10):e025628. 10.1161/jaha.122.025628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Golden AB, Hellenbrand WE. Coarctation of the aorta: stenting in children and adults. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(2):289–99. 10.1002/ccd.21009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ovaert C, Benson LN, Nykanen D, Freedom RM. Transcatheter treatment of coarctation of the aorta: a review. Pediatr Cardiol. 1998;19(1):27–44. 10.1007/s002469900243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Torok RD, Campbell MJ, Fleming GA, Hill KD. Coarctation of the aorta: management from infancy to adulthood. World J Cardiol. 2015;7(11):765–75. 10.4330/wjc.v7.i11.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Egan M, Holzer RJ. Comparing balloon angioplasty, stenting and surgery in the treatment of aortic coarctation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009;7(11):1401–12. 10.1586/erc.09.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mini N, Zartner PA, Schneider MBE. Stenting of critical aortic coarctation in neonates between 600 and 1,350 g. Using a transfemoral artery approach. A single center experience. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1025411. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1025411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zabal C, Attie F, Rosas M, Buendía-Hernández A, García-Montes JA. The adult patient with native coarctation of the aorta: balloon angioplasty or primary stenting? Heart. 2003;89(1):77–83. 10.1136/heart.89.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Van De Bruaene A, Claessen G, Salaets T, Gewillig M. Late Fontan circulatory failure. What drives systemic venous congestion and low cardiac output in adult Fontan patients? Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:825472. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.825472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Venkatesh P, Gao H, Abudayyeh I, Pai RG, Varadarajan P. Contemporary management of the failing Fontan. J Clin Med. 2024. 10.3390/jcm13113049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Flores-Umanzor E, Luna-López R, Cepas-Guillen P, et al. Transcatheter interventions in adults with Fontan palliation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17(12):e014699. 10.1161/circinterventions.124.014699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Rupp S, Schieke C, Kerst G, et al. Creation of a transcatheter fenestration in children with failure of Fontan circulation: focus on extracardiac conduit connection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(7):1189–94. 10.1002/ccd.26042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Stümper O, Gewillig M, Vettukattil J, et al. Modified technique of stent fenestration of the atrial septum. Heart. 2003;89(10):1227–30. 10.1136/heart.89.10.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Haddad RN, Bonnet D, Malekzadeh-Milani S. Embolization of vascular abnormalities in children with congenital heart diseases using medtronic micro vascular plugs. Heart Vessels. 2022;37(7):1271–82. 10.1007/s00380-021-02007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Gewillig M, Brown SC. The fontan circulation after 45 years: update in physiology. Heart. 2016;102(14):1081–6. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Salaets T, Cools B, De Meester P, et al. Stent expansion of restrictive Fontan conduits to nominal diameter and beyond. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Nov. 2022;100(6):1059–66. 10.1002/ccd.30438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Haddad RN, Naggara O, Bonnet D, Malekzadeh-Milani S. Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter stent expansion of restrictive extra-cardiac Fontan conduit. Cardiol Young. 2024;34(1):209–11. 10.1017/s1047951123004109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Jalal Z, Gewillig M, Boudjemline Y, et al. Transcatheter interventions in patients with a Fontan circulation: Current practice and future developments. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:965989. 10.3389/fped.2022.965989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Haddad RN, Bonnet D, Alsac JM, Malekzadeh-Milani S. Promising PTFE-coating technology of Optimus-CVS™ stents: the new player for congenital heart disease interventions. Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2022;7:100323. 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2022.100323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Zhang Y, Fang M, Wang Z, et al. The prediction and verification of outcome of extracardiac conduits fontan based on computational fluid dynamics simulation. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1078140. 10.3389/fphys.2022.1078140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bossers SS, Cibis M, Gijsen FJ, et al. Computational fluid dynamics in Fontan patients to evaluate power loss during simulated exercise. Heart May. 2014;100(9):696–701. 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Haddad RN, Adel Hassan A, Al Soufi M, Kasem M. A word of caution: early failure of Magmaris® bioresorbable stent after pulmonary artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101(1):131–4. 10.1002/ccd.30487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Dori Y, Keller MS, Rome JJ, et al. Percutaneous Lymphatic Embolization of Abnormal Pulmonary Lymphatic Flow as Treatment of Plastic Bronchitis in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation Mar. 2016;22(12):1160–70. 10.1161/circulationaha.115.019710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Haddad RN, Dautry R, Bonnet D, Malekzadeh-Milani S. Transvenous retrograde thoracic duct embolization for effective treatment of recurrent plastic bronchitis after Fontan palliation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101(5):863–9. 10.1002/ccd.30611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Schaffner D, Perez MH, Duran R, Pretre R, Di Bernardo S. Case report: transcatheter interventional procedure to innominate vein turn-down procedure for failing Fontan circulation. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1341443. 10.3389/fped.2024.1341443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Cedars A, Kutty S, Danford D, et al. Systemic ventricular assist device support in Fontan patients: a report by ACTION. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(5):368–76. 10.1016/j.healun.2021.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

