Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Mar 8;16:12591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-41610-3

Contact engineering of metallic Ni-integrated niobium sulfide via H2S treatment for enhanced MoS2 transistor performance and CMOS compatibility

Koki Hori 1,2,✉, Wen Hsin Chang 1, Toshifumi Irisawa 1, Atsushi Ogura 2,3, Naoya Okada 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13087010  PMID: 41796196

Abstract

For scaled transistors utilizing transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) channels, we demonstrate that the Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 is a promising contact material for n-type field-effect transistors (nFETs). This material is derived from the metallic TMDC NbS2 through Ni incorporation and enables monolayer MoS2-channel nFETs with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 source/drain contacts to achieve higher on-state current and superior thermal stability up to 600 °C compared to devices with NbS2 or Ni contacts. Metallic NbS2, owing to its high work function, is suitable as a contact material for p-type FETs (pFETs). However, the incorporation of Ni atoms into NbS2 modifies both its crystal structure and work function, effectively converting its suitability from pFETs to nFETs applications. Therefore, Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 represents a promising contact material for MoS2-channel nFETs, while NbS2 remains appropriate for pFETs, thereby advancing CMOS integration process technology for TMDC-based CMOS devices.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-41610-3.

Subject terms: Materials science, Nanoscience and technology

Introduction

The performance of Silicon-based field-effect transistors (FETs) has been enhanced through continuous miniaturization, the introduction of new materials, and the adoption of advanced structures such as FinFET and gate-all-around (GAA) architectures. However, the carrier mobility of Si nanosheet decreases significantly when the thickness falls below ~ 5 nm1–3, primarily due to potential fluctuations arising from atomic-scale variations in nanosheet thickness4. To address this issue, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have attracted considerable attention as next-generation semiconductor channel materials to replace Si nanosheet, owing to their advantageous properties, particularly their high carrier mobility even at thickness below approximately 1 nm5–8. One of the key challenges in realizing TMDC channel FETs is reducing the contact resistance at the interface between TMDC and metal electrode9–13. To reduce contact resistance, van der Waals (vdW) contacts, formed by stacking two-dimensional layered metals onto TMDC semiconductors, have been reported14,15. Examples include Au16,17, In18, and Sb19 contacts for MoS2-channel n-type FETs (nFETs) and WSe2-channel p-type FETs (pFETs). Similarly, we have previously demonstrated that vdW contacts, in which Bi2Te3 is used for WSe2-channel pFETs20 and Sb2Te3 for MoS2-channel nFETs21, lead to improved device performance. Furthermore, we recently demonstrated vdW contacts using the metallic TMDC NbS2 for WSe2-channel pFETs, achieving higher on-state currents compared to conventional metal contacts. This improvement is attributed to the high work function of NbS2 (~ 6.2 eV)22–24, which is synthesized from a Nb film through H2S annealing at 600 °C, a temperature optimized to minimize sulfidation-induced damage to WSe225. On the other hand, NbS2 is not suitable as a contact material for nFETs due to its high work function. We therefore explore alternative contact materials with consideration for integration into the CMOS fabrication process26.

In this study, we demonstrate the advantages of nickel-incorporated NbS2 (NixNbySz) as a contact material for nFETs. Nickel is commonly used as a promoter for metal-induced growth and can readily diffuse within two-dimensional materials27–29. These characteristics motivated us to investigate the possibility of tuning the structure and electronic properties of NbS2 through Ni incorporation. Accordingly, we propose a TMDC-channel CMOS comprising WSe2-channel pFETs with NbS2 contacts25 and MoS2-channels nFETs with NixNbySz, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Both contact materials were synthesized using a common H2S annealing process, enabling simplified integration into the CMOS fabrication process, as shown in Fig. 1b. We further elucidate the structure of NixNbySz on MoS2 and evaluate the thermal stability of MoS2-channels nFETs with NixNbySz contacts.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDC)-channel CMOS integration technology utilizing NbS2 for p-type FETs (pFETs) and NixNbySz contacts for n-type FETs (nFETs). Incorporation of Ni atoms into NbS2 modifies both its crystal structure and electronic properties, effectively enabling its application in nFETs. (b) Contact formation process for both pFETs and nFETs, where NixNbySz and NbS2 contacts are formed through a common H2S annealing process.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and structural analysis of NixNbySz film on MoS2

The NixNbySz film on single-crystal monolayer MoS2 (ML-MoS2) was synthesized by annealing a 1 nm-thick Nb film deposited on a 1 nm-thick Ni film atop MoS2 (Nb/Ni/MoS2) in an H2S gas atmosphere, as shown in Fig. 2a. Notably, the structure of the underlying ML-MoS2 was preserved after the formation of NixNbySz, and no diffusion or intermixing of Ni or Nb atoms into the ML-MoS2 layer was observed. Compared to a Ni-only or Nb-only film on ML-MoS2 subjected to the same annealing conditions used for NixNbySz formation, EDX analysis revealed diffusion of Ni or Nb atoms into the underlying MoS2, as shown in Fig. 2b–c. The Ni/MoS2 stack was likely converted into a Ni-Mo-S compound through sulfurization of Ni (Fig. 2b and Fig. S3), diffusion of Ni into MoS2, and/or intermixing of Ni/MoS2 during H2S annealing. Accordingly, the three-layer laminated structure of Nb/Ni/MoS2 is thermodynamically stabilized through the formation of NixNbySz on MoS2, in contrast to the Ni/MoS2 or Nb/MoS2 stacks. It is also noteworthy that Nb diffusion into ML-MoS2 was observed when the stacking order was changed from Nb/Ni/MoS2 to Ni/Nb/MoS2. This suggests that Nb atoms may have diffused into the ML-MoS2 layer during the Nb deposition process30. To elucidate the reaction mechanisms, various stacks were systematically investigated, as detailed in Supplementary Information. Notably, the Ni/Nb/MoS2 stack did not result in the formation of NixNbySz on MoS2, unlike the Ni/Nb/MoS2 stack. This difference may be attributed to Nb diffusion into MoS2, which likely suppresses the formation of NixNbySz.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mappings of (a) crystalline Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 formed on monolayer MoS2 (ML-MoS2) after H2S annealing at 600 °C, showing no diffusion or intermixing of Ni and Nb elements into the underlying ML-MoS2. (b) Ni and (c) Nb on ML-MoS2 after H2S annealing at 600 °C, showing diffusion or intermixing of Ni or Nb elements into underlying ML-MoS2.

A crystal structure of NixNbySz on ML-MoS2 was clearly observed by high-resolution cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), as shown in Fig. 3a. Here, NixNbySz was synthesized by annealing a 1 nm-thick Nb film deposited on a 1 nm-thick Ni film atop MoS2. Focused ion beam (FIB) processing was performed parallel to the sides of the triangular MoS2 domains; consequently, the cross section was observed along the [210] direction of MoS2, confirming the formation of a vdW junction with well-aligned NixNbySz on MoS2. Also, we investigated the effect of the initial Ni film thickness on the formation of NixNbySz by preparing initial stacks of Nb (1 nm)/Ni (1 nm), Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.2 nm), and Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) on ML-MoS2 (Fig. 3a–c). After H2S annealing, all NixNbySz films exhibited a uniform thickness of 2.9 nm, regardless of the initial Ni film thickness. This finding indicates that the NixNbySz film possesses a maximum Ni content, and its overall thickness is primarily determined by the initial Nb film thickness. STEM images further revealed the locations to which the excess Ni atoms had migrated, as shown in Fig. 3d–f. Ni aggregation was observed on the surface of the Nb (1 nm)/Ni (1 nm) and Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.2 nm) samples after the H2S annealing, with the amount of aggregation increasing as the initial Ni thickness increased. In contrast, surface Ni aggregation was scarcely observed in the Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) structure. Furthermore, we examined the NixNbySz film on MoS2, as shown in Fig. 4a synthesized Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) on MoS2 by H2S annealing. This crystal structure closely resembles that of Nb1.35S2, which contains excess Nb atoms located between NbS2 layers31. Figure 4b shows the positions of Ni atoms were analyzed using an electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) line scan in the STEM image. The Ni distribution (Fig. 4b) was clearly biased toward regions of higher contrast (Fig. 4a), which correspond to Nb substitution sites in NbS2. This observation suggests that the displaced Nb atoms were subsequently ejected into the interlayer region as excess Nb, owing to the stability of the substituted Ni atoms, as shown in Fig. 4c and S4. Moreover, the strong structural similarity between 2H-Nb1.35S231 and NixNbySz (Fig. 4a) suggests that similar bonding states may occur between excess Nb (or Ni) atoms and S atoms in Ni0.19Nb1.16S2, as illustrated in Fig. 4c.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

High resolution cross-sectional STEM images of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 formed by H2S annealing of (a, d) Nb (1 nm) /Ni (1 nm), (b, e) Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.2 nm) and (c, f) Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) stacks on ML-MoS2. Red flames indicate Ni aggregation on the Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 surface.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) High resolution cross-sectional STEM image of NixNbySz on ML-MoS2. (b) Corresponding elemental profiles obtained from an electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) line scan, as indicated in Fig. 3c. (c) Schematic diagrams of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2, illustrating partial substitution of Nb atoms in Nb1.35S231,32 by Ni atoms.

Assuming that all Ni atoms were incorporated into Nb1.35S2, the composition ratio x was calculated to be 0.19 in NixNb(1.35-x)S2. It is noteworthy that the Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 film likely possesses both a vdW interface and surface, leading to the formation of a vdW junction between Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 and ML-MoS2.

MoS2-channel n-type FETs with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts

We evaluated ML-MoS2-channel nFETs with the Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts formed from the Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) stack, compared to the NbS2 contacts formed from Nb (2 nm) using the same H2S annealing at 600 °C, as shown in Fig. 5a,b. The Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts exhibited a higher Ion than the NbS2 contacts, primarily because the contact resistivity of the NbS2 contacts is approximately three orders of magnitude lager, as shown in Fig. S6. This high resistivity originates from the intrinsically high work function of NbS2. In contrast, Ni incorporation effectively reduced the work function of NbS2 by forming Ni0.19Nb1.16S2. The work function of NbS2 is known to depend strongly on its crystal phase, decreasing by roughly 1 eV when transitioning from the trigonal prismatic (H phase) to the octahedral (T phase) structure, due to differences in the splitting of metal d-orbitals22. The incorporation of Ni may thus promote modifications in the crystal phase and electronic states, resulting in a reduced work function. To substantiate this hypothesis, the electron Schottky barrier height at Ni0.19Nb1.16S2/MoS2 interface was experimentally determined using temperature-dependent transport measurements9,33. The extracted barrier height was relatively low, approximately 0.12 eV, as detailed in the Supplementary Information. This result supports the conclusion that the electron Schottky barrier height of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2/MoS2 contact is lower than that of NbS2 and its close to that of Ni, as evidenced by the transfer characteristics shown in Fig. 5a, b, and d.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Drain current (ID)- gate voltage (VG) characteristics of ML-MoS2 channel nFETs with (a) Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 and (b) NbS2 contacts. (c) On-state current (Ion) of ML-MoS2 nFETs with Ni1.35−xNbxS2 contacts synthesized from Nb (1 nm)/Ni (1 nm) and (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) stacks, and NbS2 contacts synthesized from Nb (1.5 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm), Nb (2 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm), and Nb (2 nm). ID-VG characteristics of ML-MoS2 nFETs with Ni contacts (d) before and (e) after Ar annealing at 600 °C, and (f) after H2S annealing at 600 °C. (g) Electron mobility derived from ML-MoS2 nFETs with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2, NbS2, and Ni contacts.

To clarify the influence of the initial Nb/Ni film thickness ratio on contact characteristics, ML-MoS2-channel nFETs were fabricated using the following Nb/Ni configurations: Nb (1 nm)/Ni (1 nm), Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm), Nb (1.5 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm), Nb (2 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) and Nb (2 nm). The on-state current (Ion) of 30 devices, defined as the drain current (ID) at VG-Vth=100 V, is statistically distributed as shown in Fig. 5c. Compared with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts formed from different initial stacks, those derived from Nb (1 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) exhibited a broader Ion distribution, attributed to a discontinuous Ni layer with ultrathin thickness (0.1 nm). In contrast, contacts formed with initial films of Nb (1.5 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) or Nb (2 nm)/Ni (0.1 nm) showed significantly lower Ion, approaching that of NbS2 contacts formed form Nb (2 nm), likely due to NbS2 formation resulting from the higher Nb ratio.

To assess the thermal stability of ML-MoS2-channel nFETs with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts, devices with Ni contacts were annealed under identical conditions for comparison. Prior to annealing, Ni contacts exhibited an Ion comparable to that of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts. However, after Ar or H2S annealing at 600 °C, Ni contacts showed significant variation and reduced Ion, as shown in Fig. 5e and f. This degradation is attributed to the intermixing between Ni and MoS2, as previously discussed, which leads to an increase in contact resistance. These findings demonstrate that Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts provide superior thermal stability when interfaced with ML-MoS2. Figure. 5 g shows the extracted electron mobility of the fabricated transistors, calculated using following equation:

graphic file with name d33e1179.gif

where Inline graphic is the electron mobility, Inline graphicis the maximum transconductance, LG= 2 μm and W = 5 μm are the channel length and width, respectively. Inline graphic is the gate-oxide capacitance, calculated form dielectric constant (Inline graphic3.9) and oxide thickness (Inline graphic280 nm). The drain voltage was fixed at VD = 2 V. The Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts exhibited higher mobility compared to NbS2 contacts, and their performance was comparable to that of the Ni contacts.

Conclusions

The Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contact provides enhanced performance for monolayer MoS2-channel nFETs. The thickness of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 was determined by the initial Nb film thickness, with excess Ni expelled to the surface. Its crystal structure closely resembles 2H-Nb1.35S2, which consists of Nb interstitials between hexagonal NbS2 layers. Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 is formed by the substitution of some Nb atoms in Nb1.35S2 with Ni atoms, originating from the initial Nb/Ni stack via H2S annealing on monolayer MoS2. Importantly, neither Ni nor Nb atoms diffuse into the underlaying MoS2, in contrast to Ni- or Nb-only films on MoS2. These structural characteristics are consistent with the observed transistor performance, demonstrating excellent on-state current and thermal stability of Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts up to 600 °C. In contrast, NbS2 contacts are unsuitable for MoS2-channle nFETs due to their high work function. Incorporation of Ni atoms into NbS2 effectively reduces the work function, converting its suitability to nFET applications. Overall, Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 represents a promising contact material for nFETs, while NbS2 remains appropriate for pFETs, enabling the integration of 2D materials into CMOS transistors.

Methods

Synthesis of NixNbySz on MoS2

Monolayer MoS2 (ML-MoS2) on SiO2 (280 nm)/Si substrate used in this work is a commercially available product (2D semiconductors). To synthesize NixNbySz, a Ni film was deposited on ML-MoS2 via electron-beam (EB) evaporation at -5 °C, followed by continuous deposition of an Nb film on the Ni layer using the same method. The thickness uniformity of the Ni and Nb layers was approximately 5–10% across the 2-inch substrate. In the EB evaporation system, the thickness was controlled using a quartz crystal oscillator, which is a widely adopted standard method. Therefore, the reported thickness for very thin film represents an estimated value and may exhibit slightly reduced accuracy. Subsequently, H2S annealing was carried out at 600–700 °C for 30 min under a pressure of 50 kPa.

Fabrication of ML-MoS2-channel nFETs with Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 contacts

After cleaning the ML-MoS2 on a SiO2/Si substrate with acetone and isopropanol (IPA), the source and drain contact regions were patterned by photolithography. Nb and Ni films were then deposited onto the ML-MoS2 by EB evaporation. The contact sections were formed using a lift-off process in acetone and IPA, followed by continuous H2S annealing to synthesize Ni0.19Nb1.16S2. Subsequently, 30 nm-thick Au electrodes were fabricated on the Ni0.19Nb1.16S2 layer by photolithography and lift-off processing. The backside SiO2 of the devices was then removed using a hydrogen fluoride (HF) solution, and Au was deposited to form the back-gate electrode. Finally, the channel areas were isolated by photolithography and reactive ion etching (RIE) using SF6 gas.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author contributions

K. H. fabricated the devices and evaluated their electrical characteristics. N. O. conceived and supervised the experiment. The manuscript was written by K. H., and N. O., with contributions and discussions from all authors.

Funding

This research was supported by JPS KAKENHI (JP23H01574) and JST MIRAI (JPMJMI22708192).

Data availability

The data set used in this study is available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Koki Hori, Email: hori-koki@aist.go.jp.

Naoya Okada, Email: okada-naoya@aist.go.jp.

References

  • 1.Uchida, K. et al. Experimental study on carrier transport mechanism in ultrathin-body SOI nand p-MOSFETs with SOI thickness less than 5 nm. in IEEE Int. Electron. Devices Meeting 47 (2002). 10.1109/IEDM.2002.1175776.
  • 2.Uchida, K. & Takagi, S. Experimental study on carrier transport mechanisms in double- and single-gate ultrathin-body MOSFETs - Coulomb scattering, volume inversion, and /spl delta/T/sub SOI/-induced scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett.82, 2916. (2003). 10.1109/IEDM.2003.1269402 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmidt, M. et al. Mobility extraction in SOI MOSFETs with sub 1nm body thickness. Solid State Electron.53, 1246. 10.1016/j.sse.2009.09.017 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee, Y. S., Shim, T. H., Yoo, S. D. & Park, J. G. Silicon thickness fluctuation scattering dependence of electron mobility in ultrathin body silicon-on-insulator n-metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors. J. Appl. Phys.103, 084503. 10.1063/1.2902951 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chhowalla, M., Jena, D. & Zhang, H. Two-dimensional semiconductors for transistors. Nat. Reviews Mater.1, 16052. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.52 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu, Y., Duan, X., Huang, Y. & Duan, X. Two-dimensional transistors beyond graphene and TMDCs. Chem. Soc. Rev.47, 6388. 10.1039/C8CS00318A (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Akinwande, D. et al. Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology. Nature573, 507. 10.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu, Y. et al. Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors. Nature591, 43. 10.1038/s41586-021-03339-z (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Allain, A., Kang, J., Banerjee, K. & Kis, A. Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater.14, 1195. 10.1038/nmat4452 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim, C. et al. Fermi Level Pinning at Electrical Metal Contacts of Monolayer Molybdenum Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano. 11, 1588. 10.1021/acsnano.6b07159 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim, G. S. et al. Schottky barrier height engineering for electrical contacts of multilayered MoS2 transistors with reduction of metal-induced gap states. ACS Nano. 12, 6292. 10.1021/acsnano.8b03331 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sotthewes, K. et al. Universal fermi-level pinning in transition-metal dichalcogenides. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 5411. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10971 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu, X., Choi, M. S., Hwang, E., Yoo, W. J. & Sun, J. Fermi Level Pinning Dependent 2D Semiconductor Devices: Challenges and Prospects. Adv. Mater.34, 2108425. 10.1002/adma.202108425 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma, L., Wang, Y. & van der Liu, Y. Waals contact for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Rev.124, 2583. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00697 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seo, J., Sohn, I. & Kim, H. Contact engineering in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide-based devices: Industry-compatible approaches toward ultralow contact resistance. ACS Mater. Lett.7, 3190. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c01010 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu, Y. et al. Approaching the Schottky–Mott limit in van der Waals metal–semiconductor junctions. Nature557, 696. 10.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kwon, G. et al. Interaction- and defect-free van der Waals contacts between metals and two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Electron.5, 241. 10.1038/s41928-022-00746-6 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang, Y. et al. Van der Waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors. Nature568, 70–74. 10.1038/s41586-019-1052-3 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li, W. et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts. Nature613, 274. 10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chang, W. H. et al. Thermally stable Bi2Te3/WSe2 Van Der Waals contacts for pMOSFETs application. Sci. Rep.14, 28572. 10.1038/s41598-024-79750-z (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang, W. H. et al. Sb2Te3/MoS2 Van der Waals Junctions with high thermal stability and low contact resistance. Adv. Electron. Mater.9, 2201091. 10.1002/aelm.202201091 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ding, X. et al. NbS2: A Promising p-Type Ohmic Contact for Two-Dimensional Materials. Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 064061. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064061 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shen, T., Ren, J. C., Liu, X., Li, S. & van der Liu, W. Waals Stacking Induced Transition from Schottky to Ohmic Contacts: 2D Metals on Multilayer InSe. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 3110. 10.1021/jacs.8b12212 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang, N. et al. Computational Screening and Multiscale Simulation of Barrier-Free Contacts for 2D Semiconductor pFETs. IEDM 28.1.1 (2022). 10.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019377.
  • 25.Hori, K., Chang, W. H., Irisawa, T., Ogura, A. & Okada, N. Layered NbS2 contacts formed via H2S reaction with Nb for high-performance WSe2-channel p-type transistor. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 12SP21. 10.35848/1347-4065/ad974d (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hori, K., Chang, W. H., Irisawa, T., Ogura, A. & Okada, N. Source/Drain Contact Formation Using H2S Annealing for TMDC-channel CMOS: NixNb1-xS2 Contacts for MoS2 nFET and NbS2 contacts for WSe2 pFET. SSDM Extended Abstract 491. 10.7567/SSDM.2025.K-3-02 (2025).
  • 27.Galun, E. et al. Crystallization of layered metal-dichalcogenides films on amorphous substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett.67, 3474–3476. 10.1063/1.115251 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Regula, M., Ballif, C., Remskar, M. & Levy, F. Crystallinity and texture promotion in WS2 thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A. 15, 2323. 10.1116/1.580742 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gourmelon, E. et al. MS2 (M = W, Mo) photosensitive thin films for solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 46, 115. 10.1016/S0927-0248(96)00096-7 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tanaka, I. et al. Quantitative ToF-SIMS assessment of in-plane and out-of-plane Nb doping uniformity in CVT-grown MoS2 crystals. Small Methods. 9, e01405. (2025). 10.1002/smtd.202501405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang, J. et al. Ultrahigh-current-density niobium disulfide catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater.18, 1309–1314. 10.1038/s41563-019-0463-8 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohmad, A. R. et al. Synthesis of Metallic Mixed 3R and 2H Nb1+xS2 Nanoflakes by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Faraday Discuss.227, 332. 10.1039/C9FD00132H (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shen, P. C. et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature593, 211. 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data set used in this study is available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES