Skip to main content
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2026 Apr 9;14:e174893. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.14.e174893

Metagenomic survey of fungal communities in compost from dairy plant wastewater sludge and garden trimmings

Paulo Monjardino 1,, Ana Rita Azevedo 1, Duarte Mendonça 1, Gabor Pozsgai 2, Paulo A V Borges 2,3, Jorge Frias 4, Duarte Toubarro 4
PMCID: PMC13087657  PMID: 42004633

Abstract

Background

Composting converts organic residues into stable organic matter and nutrients under aerobic conditions, improving soil properties and microbiome balance, while mitigating environmental impacts. Although microbiomes of various compost types have been studied, information is still fragmented and often not tailored to specific raw material combinations. In particular, little is known about the fungal communities involved in composting dairy plant wastewater sludge mixed with garden trimmings. This data paper contributes to filling that gap by providing a comprehensive taxonomic inventory.

New information

We provide a fungus-focused dataset from 18 compost samples generated from a 1:1 (w/w) mix of garden trimmings and dairy plant wastewater sludge, collected at three process stages (thermophilic start/end; mid-cooling and maturation) under two turning regimes. Shotgun metagenomes were taxonomically annotated against NCBI taxonomy (accessed 19 Feb 2025). Only Fungi were detected within Eukarya, spanning nine phyla; Ascomycota (60.8%), Mucoromycota (17.76%), Basidiomycota (8.50%) and Chytridiomycota (7.21%) comprised 94.27% of the taxonomic features. We report 417 genera (13 >1% relative abundance each); top: Aspergillus (17.93%), Rhizopus (8.61%), Chaetomium (4.83%), Aureobasidium (3.09%), Madurella (2.85%), Paramicrosporidium (2.71%), Rhizophagus (1.88%), Rasamsonia (1.81%), Hyaloraphidium (1.39%), Thermochaetoides (1.31%), Talaromyces (1.19%), Trichoderma (1.15%), Podospora (1.06%) comprised 49.81% of the taxonomic feature abundance. Overall 663 taxa were identified (578 species, 416 genera, 230 families, 106 orders, 48 classes and 9 phyla). The dataset (DwCA; 663 occurrences) is intended to serve as a reference for compost mycobiomes and will be available via GBIF (DOI 10.15468/nmpzwr).

Keywords: Thermophilic, cooling and maturation, garden trimmings, wastewater sludge, microbiome

Introduction

Composting is an aerobic process, in which microorganisms decompose organic matter into more stable compounds. The resulting product can be applied in agriculture as an organic fertiliser that improves soil physical properties, enriches the microbiome and enhances crop health while also contributing to nutrient recycling. In addition, composting reduces the environmental impact of organic residue accumulation and lowers sanitary risks through the pasteurisation effect of the thermophilic stage, which eliminates most coliform bacteria (Lin et al. 2018).

Sewage sludge, when co-composted with lignocellulosic materials, produces a stabilied, nutrient-enriched product. Nitrogen-rich wastes, such as food residues, manure and sewage sludge (C/N = 10–20), are typically combined with carbon-rich biomass (C/N > 50), which balances the C/N ratio and improves aeration while reducing leachate (Lin et al. 2018, Tarpani et al. 2020, Hoang et al. 2022). Composting also facilitates the dissipation of organic contaminants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pharmaceuticals, antibiotic-resistance genes and microplastics (Hoang et al. 2022).

Compared with anaerobic digestion, lime treatment, pyrolysis or incineration, composting offers several advantages, including nutrient recovery, low investment and operational costs, suitability for small- and medium-scale facilities and the potential to substitute chemical fertilisers. However, disadvantages include variable greenhouse gas emissions, high energy demand, requirement for large processing areas, limited volume reduction and no energy recovery (Hoang et al. 2022, Yu et al. 2023).

Microbial activity during composting is stage-dependent: bacteria dominate during the mesophilic and thermophilic phases, whereas fungi become more active during cooling and maturation (Tuomela et al. 2000). Labile compounds, such as sugars, starch, amino acids and lipids, are degraded early, releasing CO₂ and ammonia, whereas more recalcitrant polymers (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) are broken down later, contributing to humus formation. Fungi play a particularly important role due to their extracellular enzyme production, which enables the degradation of complex polymers and facilitates microbial interactions within compost piles (Awasthi et al. 2023).

General description

Purpose

This dataset provides information on the fungal community associated with the composting process. Composting is a biologically driven degradation process in which organic matter is transformed into a stable and nutrient-rich product. Fungi play an essential role in this process because of their ability to degrade complex polymers such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, thereby accelerating organic matter decomposition and influencing the final quality of compost. The dataset was generated to document the diversity and taxonomic composition of fungi present in the composting material. The present Data Paper does not aim to evaluate treatment and compost stage effects (which will be addressed in a future article), but rather to provide baseline information for applied microbiology, waste management and soil fertility studies.

Project description

Title

Metagenomic Survey of Compost Fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago)

Personnel

The project was conceived by Paulo Monjardino.

Fieldwork: Cátia Pereira, Paulo Monjardino.

Database management: Paulo Monjardino.

Darwin Core Database management: Paulo A. V. Borges & Paulo Monjardino.

Funding

VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307, FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05292/2025 DOI https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05292/2025 and from the Azorean Regional Directorate of Science, Innovation and Development, through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System, Ref. M1.1. A/FUNC.UI&D/016/2025).

Sampling methods

Sampling description

Compost Production

Composting was performed at an open-air, industrial-scale facility operated by Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM (38.67583° N, −27.17433° W). Wastewater sludge from a dairy processing plant was mixed with garden trimmings at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio. Garden trimmings were made of trees and shrubs branches (no more than 15 cm diameter), palm leaves, grass cuttings and garden herbaceous ornamentals. Two windrow-turning regimes were applied: (i) triweekly during the thermophilic stage and weekly during the cooling and maturation stages and (ii) once every three weeks throughout all stages.

Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

Samples were collected at the beginning and end of the thermophilic stage and at the mid-cooling and maturation. Material was obtained by digging 50–60 cm into the piles, ≈ 1 m above the ground, from three zones (external and middle) and bulked into composite samples. Each sample (200–300 g) was placed in a sterile bag and transported to the laboratory.

Samples were homogenied in PBS (pH 7.4), centrifuged, and the pellets were stored at −80 °C. Metagenomic DNA was extracted using the repeated bead-beating method (Yu and Morrison 2018) combined with a Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research 2017). DNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and stored at −20 °C.

Shotgun Sequencing

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed by Novogene (Cambridge, UK) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), which provides high accuracy, scalability, and sequencing depth for complex microbiome studies (NOVOGENE 2023).

Genomic DNA (200 ng) was randomly sheared into ≈ 350 bp fragments using a Covaris ultrasonic disruptor. Libraries were prepared using Novogene NGS DNA Library Prep Set (Cat. No. PT004). Briefly, the fragmented DNA underwent end repair and A-tailing to produce blunt ends with adenine overhangs, followed by ligation of Illumina sequencing adapters containing unique barcodes. Size selection was performed to retain fragments of 350–450 bp by using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). To enrich adapter-ligated fragments, PCR amplification was carried out when DNA input was low; for high-input samples, PCR-free preparation was applied to minimise bias.

Library quality was verified by fragment integrity and insert size analysis (AATI) and the effective library concentration was quantified by qPCR (> 3 nM). Qualified libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with two-channel sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) chemistry. Paired-end sequencing (PE150) was employed to provide high-accuracy reads and improve the assembly performance, with error rates below 1%.

Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw reads were filtered using Trimmomatic v.0.39 to obtain high-quality clean data for downstream analysis. Reads from each sample were assembled individually to recover information from low-abundance species and the unused reads were pooled for mixed assembly using the metaSPAdes v.4.1.0 assembler. Gene prediction was carried out using MetaGeneMark v.3.25, based on the scaftigs that were assembled by single and mixed samples. The predicted genes were pooled and dereplicated to construct a non-redundant gene catalogue. Gene abundance for each sample was quantified by mapping reads back to this catalogue using a read mapper (Bowtie v.2.5.4). Taxonomic annotation was obtained for metagenomic reads against the microNR database, a curated collection of taxonomically informative gene families, using sequence alignment software called DIAMOND v.2.1.12. Taxon-specific abundance profiles were inferred from gene abundance estimates and aggregated to generate taxonomic feature tables at multiple taxonomic ranks. The taxonomic hierarchy of all fungal taxa was standardised and updated according to the NCBI Taxonomy database (accessed April 2025) using the taxize v.0.10.0 package in R v.4.5.1.

The data presented in this article originate from a composite analysis of 18 samples and represent the mean value across the entire sample set.

Geographic coverage

Description

Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal. Solid waste processing centre managed by Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM. In Terceira Island (Azores Archipelago).

Coordinates

38.676 and 38.676 Latitude; -27.174 and -27.174 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

Description

The following Phyla are covered: Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Cryptomycota, Microsporidia, Mucoromycota, Olpidiomycota, Zoopagomycota.

The following Classes are covered: Agaricomycetes, Arthoniomycetes, Basidiobolomycetes, Blastocladiomycetes, Candelariomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, Coniocybomycetes, Dacrymycetes, Dimargaritomycetes, Dipodascomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Endogonomycetes, Entomophthoromycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Exobasidiomycetes, Geoglossomycetes, Glomeromycetes, Harpellomycetes, Kickxellomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lichinomycetes, Lipomycetes, Malasseziomycetes, Microbotryomycetes, Mixiomycetes, Monoblepharidomycetes, Mortierellomycetes, Mucoromycetes, Neolectomycetes, Neocallimastigomycetes, Olpidiomycetes, Orbiliomycetes, Pezizomycetes, Physodermatomycetes, Pichiomycetes, Pneumocystomycetes, Pucciniomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Schizosaccharomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Taphrinomycetes, Tremellomycetes, Umbelopsidomycetes, Ustilaginomycetes, Wallemiomycetes, Xylobotryomycetes, Zoopagomycetes.

Taxa included

Rank Scientific Name Common Name
kingdom Fungi Fungi

Temporal coverage

Data range: 2022-3-14 – 2022-11-28.

Notes

The presented data were obtained from 18 samples collected between March 14, 2022 and November 28, 2022. DNA extraction was performed between March 8 and May 19, 2023, and sequencing analysis was completed in August 2023 (exact date unknown).

Usage licence

Usage licence

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

Data resources

Data package title

Metagenomic Survey of Compost Fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago)

Resource link

https://ipt.gbif.pt/ipt/resource?r=compost_eukarya

Alternative identifiers

https://www.gbif.org/dataset/e3b9f473-b41e-427e-89fc-990c973c8e05

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

Occurrence Table

Data format

Darwin Core Archive

Character set

UTF-8

Download URL

https://ipt.gbif.pt/ipt/resource?r=compost_eukarya

Data format version

1.3

Description

The dataset was published in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility platform, GBIF (Monjardino et al. 2026). The following data-table includes all the records for which a taxonomic identification of the species was possible. The dataset submitted to GBIF is structured as a sample occurrence dataset that has been published as a Darwin Core Archive (DwCA), which is a standardised format for sharing biodiversity data as a set of one or more data tables. The core data file contains 663 records (eventID; and occurrenceID). This GBIF IPT (Integrated Publishing Toolkit, Version 2.5.6) archives the data and, thus, serves as the data repository. The data and resource metadata are available for download in the Portuguese GBIF Portal IPT (Monjardino et al. 2026).

Data set 1.
Column label Column description
id Identifier generated by GBIF IPT.
type The nature or genre of the resource.
licence Reference to the licence under which the record is published.
institutionID An identifier for the institution publishing the data.
institutionCode The code of the institution publishing the data.
basisOfRecord The nature of the data record (MaterialSample).
occurrenceID Identifier of the record, coded as a global unique identifier.
recordedBy A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who performed the sampling in the field.
organismQuantity A number or enumeration value for the quantity of Organisms.
organismQuantityType The type of quantification system used for the quantity of organisms.
eventID Identifier of the events, unique for the dataset
eventDate The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred.
year Year the sample was collected.
eventRemarks Comments or notes about the dwc:Event.
habitat The surveyed habitat, in this case, a waste management site.
samplingProtocol The sampling protocol used to capture the species.
sampleSizeValue A numeric value for a measurement of the size (time duration, length, area or volume) of a sample in a sampling dwc:Event.
sampleSizeUnit The unit of measurement of the size (time duration, length, area or volume) of a sample in a sampling dwc:Event.
locationID Identifier of the location.
islandGroup The name of the island group in which the Location occurs (Azores Archipelago).
island The name of the island on which the Location occurs (Terceira).
country The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs (Portugal).
countryCode The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs (PT).
stateProvince The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs.
municipality The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than county (city, municipality etc.) in which the Location occurs.
locality The specific description of the place.
minimumElevationInMetres The lower limit of the range of elevation (altitude, usually above sea level), in metres.
decimalLatitude Approximate centre point decimal latitude of the field site in GPS coordinates.
decimalLongitude Approximate centre point decimal longitude of the field site in GPS coordinates.
geodeticDatum Standard Global Positioning System coordinate reference for the location of the sample collection points.
coordinateUncertaintyInMetres Uncertain value of coordinate metrics.
coordinatePrecision Value in decimal degrees to a precision of six decimal places.
georeferenceSources Navigation system used to record the location of sample collections.
identifiedBy A list of names of people, groups or organisations who assigned the Taxon to the subject.
dateIdentified The date on which the subject was determined as representing the Taxon.
identificationRemarks Comments or notes about the dwc:Identification.
scientificName The full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known.
kingdom Kingdom name.
phylum Phylum name.
class Class name.
order Order name.
family Family name.
genus Genus name.
specificEpithet Specific epithet name.
taxonRank Lowest taxonomic rank of the record.
scientificNameAuthorship The authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode.

Additional information

The microbiome analysis revealed four major groups: Eukarya, Archaea, Bacteria and Viruses (NCBI 2025). This study focuses exclusively on the Eukarya domain.

Within Eukarya, only the Fungi kingdom was detected, representing 0.01–0.1% of all taxonomic features and ranked as the least abundant group in 16 of the 18 compost samples. No other eukaryotic organisms (e.g. invertebrates, protozoa and algae) were detected. The absence of non-fungal eukaryotes in our dataset is likely related to strong ecological filtering during the thermophilic phase of composting. Temperatures during this stage commonly exceed 55–65°C, creating prolonged heat stress conditions that eliminate or severely reduce most non-spore-forming eukaryotes (Lin et al. 2018). Many fungal taxa are capable of surviving such conditions through thermotolerance mechanisms, rapid stress-response systems or the production of resistant structures such as spores (Tuomela et al. 2000). The thermophilic phase also accelerates organic matter degradation and alters oxygen availability and moisture dynamics, further restricting the establishment of other eukaryotic groups. Temperature-driven ecological filtering is a key determinant of compost microbial succession (Awasthi et al. 2023). The eukaryotic community may already have undergone strong selective filtering, resulting in the dominance of fungi. Aditionally, the very low overall proportion of Eukarya-derived reads (0.01–0.1%) suggests that other eukaryotic groups, if present, may fall below detection thresholds in shotgun metagenomic datasets dominated by bacterial and archaeal DNA (Quince et al. 2017).

Previous studies have similarly reported a relatively low abundance of fungi during composting (Martins et al. 2013, Wang et al. 2022, Aguilar-Paredes et al. 2023), suggesting that, while fungi contribute to the composting process, bacteria consistently dominate the microbial community. Although fungi represent a relatively small fraction of total metagenomic reads, their ecological importance in composting is disproportionate to their numerical abundance. Fungi are key degraders of recalcitrant polymers, such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin during both the thermophilic and subsequent cooling and maturation stages (Mello et al. 2017, Varma et al. 2017).

The present dataset provides an extensive inventory of fungal taxa identified in compost. While many have previously been reported in composting systems, others were not found in Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar or GBIF searches. This may reflect database limitations, as taxa not explicitly cited in titles, abstracts or indexed keywords are easily overlooked. Records from Google Scholar and GBIF can complement this gap, but require validation due to lower precision.

Another important consideration is the evolving state of fungal taxonomy. Over the past decade, major revisions have occurred following the abandonment of dual nomenclature and the adoption of molecular methods, which have clarified earlier misclassifications (Kidd et al. 2023). Consequently, even recent articles (as late as 2024) may report taxa using outdated classification. Taxonomic databases, including the NCBI database (NCBI 2025), are frequently updated. Between our first survey in 2023 and the present, 40–50 taxa have undergone reclassification, mainly at the species, genus and family levels and, in some cases, at the order and class levels.

The dominance of Ascomycota (Table 1) is consistent with other composting studies (Lin et al. 2018, Awasthi et al. 2023). However, the relatively high abundance of Mucoromycota, Basidiomycota and Chytridiomycota, which ranked second, third and fourth in taxonomic feature abundance, respectively, has not been reported elsewhere. Factors, such as raw material composition, mixture ratio, aeration, C/N balance, moisture, pH, shredding of garden trimmings and local environmental conditions, strongly affect the compost microbiome and may explain these differences. In metabolic terms, these fungal phyla play distinct roles during composting. Ascomycota and Mucoromycota contribute to the rapid degradation of simple carbohydrates and hemicellulose, Basidiomycota are particularly important lignin degraders through oxidative enzymes such as laccases and peroxidases and Chytridiomycota participate in the hydrolysis of cellulose and other recalcitrant polymers (Tuomela et al. 2000, Awasthi et al. 2023). Nevertheless, all phyla identified in this study have been reported previously in compost (Tuomela et al. 2000, Cai et al. 2018, Lin et al. 2018, He et al. 2022, Awasthi et al. 2023, Liu et al. 2024, Mahongnao et al. 2024, Ahmad et al. 2024).

Table 1.

List of phyla detected during the composting process, with corresponding classified reads aggregated at phylum level and relative abundances (RA) within the Eukarya domain, confirmed in the NCBI Taxonomy Browser.

Phylum Classified reads RA
Ascomycota 135741 60.80%
Basidiomycota 18971 8.50%
Blastocladiomycota 1068 0.48%
Chytridiomycota 16096 7.21%
Cryptomycota 6508 2.92%
Microsporidia 2318 1.04%
Mucoromycota 39638 17.76%
Olpidiomycota 98 0.04%
Zoopagomycota 2802 1.26%
Total 223241

At the genus level, the most abundant taxa (relative abundance of classified reads > 1%) were Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Chaetomium, Aureobasidium, Madurella, Paramicrosporidium, Rhizophagus, Rasamsonia, Hyaloraphidium, Thermochaetoides, Talaromyces, Trichoderma and Podospora (Table 2). These genera can be broadly grouped according to their metabolic or ecological roles during composting: (i) decomposers and nutrient cyclers (Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Podospora, Thermochaetoides); (ii) biocontrol and cellulolytic fungi (Trichoderma, Chaetomium, Talaromyces, Rasamsonia); (iii) yeasts and opportunistic fungi (Aureobasidium, Madurella); (iv) microsporidia and chytrids associated with aquatic or anaerobic niches (Paramicrosporidium, Hyaloraphidium) and (v) mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus). Most of these genera have been previously reported in compost or during composting (Tuomela et al. 2000, Sebők et al. 2015, Anastasi et al. 2017, Cai et al. 2018, Lu et al. 2024, Mahongnao et al. 2024, Ahmad et al. 2024). Paramicrosporidium and Hyaloraphidium have been reported in non-aerated compost tea (Mengesha et al. 2017) and Paramicrosporidium was also detected in the gut of Hermetia illucens larvae grown in urban compost (Vallejo-Arróliga and Rojas-Jimenez 2024), suggesting that both genera may be associated with the composting environment.

Table 2.

List of classes, orders, families and genera detected during the composting process, with corresponding classified reads counts and relative abundances (RA) within the Eukarya domain, confirmed in the NCBI Taxonomy Browser.

class order family genus Classified reads RA
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Aaosphaeria 48 0.02%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Cunninghamellaceae Absidia 269 0.12%
Exobasidiomycetes Exobasidiales Cryptobasidiaceae Acaromyces 17 0.01%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Acaulosporaceae Acaulospora 96 0.04%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Teratosphaeriaceae Acidomyces 23 0.01%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Actinomortierella 91 0.04%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Agaricaceae Agaricus 34 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Strophariaceae Agrocybe 48 0.02%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Pleosporaceae Alternaria 60 0.03%
Arthoniomycetes Arthoniales Lecanographaceae Alyxoria 29 0.01%
Glomeromycetes Archaeosporales Ambisporaceae Ambispora 1196 0.54%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Amniculicolaceae Amniculicola 59 0.03%
Amphiacanthidae Amphiamblys 17 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Amylocarpus 38 0.02%
Neocallimastigomycetes Neocallimastigales Neocallimastigaceae Anaeromyces 104 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Hypoxylaceae Annulohypoxylon 1963 0.88%
Dothideomycetes Botryosphaeriales Aplosporellaceae Aplosporella 62 0.03%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Apophysomyces 1266 0.57%
Orbiliomycetes Orbiliales Orbiliaceae Arthrobotrys 389 0.17%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Arthrodermataceae Arthroderma 18 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Arthromyces 18 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ascosphaeraceae Ascosphaera 31 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Aspergillaceae Aspergillus 40031 17.93%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Asterophora 26 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Astraeaceae Astraeus 787 0.35%
Agaricomycetes Atheliales Atheliaceae Athelia 62 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Dothideales Saccotheciaceae Aureobasidium 6896 3.09%
Lecanoromycetes Lecanorales Ramalinaceae Bacidia 19 0.01%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Backusellaceae Backusella 30 0.01%
Basidiobolomycetes Basidiobolales Basidiobolaceae Basidiobolus 220 0.10%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Batrachochytrium 2052 0.92%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Cordycipitaceae Beauveria 627 0.28%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Benjaminiella 20 0.01%
Endogonomycetes Endogonales Bifiguratus 328 0.15%
Blastocladiomycetes Blastocladiales Blastocladiaceae Blastocladiella 490 0.22%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ajellomycetaceae Blastomyces 276 0.12%
Chytridiomycetes Blyttiomyces 132 0.06%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Boletaceae Boletus 39 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Bondarzewiaceae Bondarzewia 171 0.08%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Terramycetaceae Boothiomyces 53 0.02%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophlyctidales Borealophlyctidaceae Borealophlyctis 131 0.06%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Sclerotiniaceae Botryotinia 22 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Sclerotiniaceae Botrytis 230 0.10%
Pichiomycetes Pichiales Pichiaceae Brettanomyces 25 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Ploettnerulaceae Cadophora 51 0.02%
Dacrymycetes Dacrymycetales Dacrymycetaceae Calocera 415 0.19%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Nectriaceae Calonectria 203 0.09%
Candelariomycetes Candelariales Candelariaceae Candelaria 194 0.09%
Pichiomycetes Serinales Debaryomycetaceae Candida 794 0.36%
Agaricomycetes Cantharellales Hydnaceae Cantharellus 42 0.02%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Ancylistaceae Capillidium 110 0.05%
Blastocladiomycetes Blastocladiales Catenariaceae Catenaria 89 0.04%
Sordariomycetes Microascales Microascaceae Cephalotrichum 876 0.39%
Agaricomycetes Cantharellales Ceratobasidiaceae Ceratobasidium 997 0.45%
Sordariomycetes Microascales Ceratocystidaceae Ceratocystis 127 0.06%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Gigasporaceae Cetraspora 863 0.39%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Chaetomium 10780 4.83%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Choanephoraceae Choanephora 71 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Gomphidiaceae Chroogomphus 50 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Cryphonectriaceae Chrysoporthe 1935 0.87%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytridiaceae Chytridium 21 0.01%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytriomycetaceae Chytriomyces 1061 0.48%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Lichtheimiaceae Circinella 409 0.18%
Xylobotryomycetes Xylobotryales Cirrosporiaceae Cirrosporium 48 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Hypocreaceae Cladobotryum 184 0.08%
Chytridiomycetes Cladochytriales Cladochytriaceae Cladochytrium 408 0.18%
Eurotiomycetes Chaetothyriales Herpotrichiellaceae Cladophialophora 103 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Clavicipitaceae Claviceps 43 0.02%
Pichiomycetes Serinales Metschnikowiaceae Clavispora 18 0.01%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Lindgomycetaceae Clohesyomyces 48 0.02%
Chytridiomycetes Lobulomycetales Lobulomycetaceae Clydaea 20 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Onygenaceae Coccidioides 200 0.09%
Blastocladiomycetes Blastocladiales Coelomomycetaceae Coelomomyces 137 0.06%
Kickxellomycetes Kickxellales Kickxellaceae Coemansia 322 0.14%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Dermateaceae Coleophoma 109 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Collariella 114 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Glomerellales Glomerellaceae Colletotrichum 1965 0.88%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Ancylistaceae Conidiobolus 107 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Coniochaetales Coniochaetaceae Coniochaeta 169 0.08%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Coniothyriaceae Coniothyrium 623 0.28%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Psathyrellaceae Coprinellus 56 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Corynesporascaceae Corynespora 88 0.04%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Crepidotaceae Crepidotus 18 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Cryphonectriaceae Cryphonectria 196 0.09%
Tremellomycetes Tremellales Cryptococcaceae Cryptococcus 112 0.05%
Cucumispora 341 0.15%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Tricladiaceae Cudoniella 6 0.00%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Cunninghamellaceae Cunninghamella 24 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Nidulariaceae Cyathus 64 0.03%
Dacrymycetes Dacrymycetales Dacrymycetaceae Dacryopinax 58 0.03%
Orbiliomycetes Orbiliales Orbiliaceae Dactylella 518 0.23%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Nectriaceae Dactylonectria 23 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Hypoxylaceae Daldinia 630 0.28%
Pichiomycetes Serinales Debaryomycetaceae Debaryomyces 303 0.14%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Dendrothele 49 0.02%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Gigasporaceae Dentiscutata 85 0.04%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Diaporthaceae Diaporthe 78 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Polyporaceae Dichomitus 77 0.03%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Lichtheimiaceae Dichotomocladium 146 0.07%
Dictyocoela 69 0.03%
Dimargaritomycetes Dimargaritales Dimargaritaceae Dimargaris 169 0.08%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytridiaceae Dinochytrium 76 0.03%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Drepanopezizaceae Diplocarpon 37 0.02%
Lecanoromycetes Ostropales Graphidaceae Diploschistes 128 0.06%
Kickxellomycetes Kickxellales Kickxellaceae Dipsacomyces 120 0.05%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Dissophora 62 0.03%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Diversisporaceae Diversispora 1695 0.76%
Orbiliomycetes Orbiliales Orbiliaceae Drechslerella 108 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Durotheca 28 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Elaphomycetaceae Elaphomyces 304 0.14%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ajellomycetaceae Emergomyces 17 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Bionectriaceae Emericellopsis 144 0.06%
Endogonomycetes Endogonales Endogonaceae Endogone 418 0.19%
Enteropsectra 55 0.02%
Enterocytozoonidae Enterospora 84 0.04%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Entomophthoraceae Entomophthora 30 0.01%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Entomortierella 67 0.03%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytriomycetaceae Entophlyctis 23 0.01%
Glomeromycetes Entrophosporales Entrophosporaceae Entrophospora 322 0.14%
Dothideomycetes Eremomycetales Eremomycetaceae Eremomyces 152 0.07%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycetales Saccharomycetaceae Eremothecium 13 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Erysiphales Erysiphaceae Erysiphe 509 0.23%
Agaricomycetes Auriculariales Exidiaceae Exidia 47 0.02%
Exobasidiomycetes Exobasidiales Exobasidiaceae Exobasidium 15 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Chaetothyriales Herpotrichiellaceae Exophiala 61 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Pleosporaceae Exserohilum 873 0.39%
Tremellomycetes Filobasidiales Filobasidiaceae Filobasidium 256 0.11%
Chytridiomycetes Spizellomycetales Powellomycetaceae Fimicolochytrium 42 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Tricholomataceae Flagelloscypha 18 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Hymenochaetales Hymenochaetaceae Fomitiporia 314 0.14%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Fomitopsidaceae Fomitopsis 62 0.03%
Eurotiomycetes Chaetothyriales Herpotrichiellaceae Fonsecaea 65 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Teratosphaeriaceae Friedmanniomyces 595 0.27%
Glomeromycetes Glomerales Glomeraceae Funneliformis 1048 0.47%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Nectriaceae Fusarium 599 0.27%
Chytridiomycetes Spizellomycetales Spizellomycetaceae Gaertneriomyces 90 0.04%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Gamsiella 63 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Polyporaceae Ganoderma 37 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Sordariaceae Gelasinospora 68 0.03%
Geoglossomycetes Geoglossales Geoglossaceae Geoglossum 469 0.21%
Glomeromycetes Archaeosporales Geosiphonaceae Geosiphon 80 0.04%
Dipodascomycetes Dipodascales Dipodascaceae Geotrichum 373 0.17%
Chytridiomycetes Spizellomycetales Powellomycetaceae Geranomyces 126 0.06%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Gigasporaceae Gigaspora 1068 0.48%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Globomycetaceae Globomyces 276 0.12%
Glomeromycetes Glomerales Glomeraceae Glomus 40 0.02%
Geoglossomycetes Geoglossales Geoglossaceae Glutinoglossum 359 0.16%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Gnomoniaceae Gnomoniopsis 19 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Erysiphales Erysiphaceae Golovinomyces 297 0.13%
Lecanoromycetes Ostropales Graphidaceae Gomphillus 297 0.13%
Monoblepharidomycetes Monoblepharidales Gonapodyaceae Gonapodya 597 0.27%
Dothideomycetes Acrospermales Acrospermaceae Gonatophragmium 87 0.04%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Cunninghamellaceae Gongronella 197 0.09%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Gorgonomycetaceae Gorgonomyces 1147 0.51%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Gryganskiella 40 0.02%
Lecanoromycetes Teloschistales Teloschistaceae Gyalolechia 20 0.01%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Cunninghamellaceae Halteromyces 24 0.01%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycodales Saccharomycodaceae Hanseniaspora 44 0.02%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Haplosporangium 59 0.03%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Bionectriaceae Hapsidospora 16 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Hymenogastraceae Hebeloma 330 0.15%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ajellomycetaceae Helicocarpus 111 0.05%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Hericiaceae Hericium 218 0.10%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Meruliaceae Hermanssonia 76 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Bondarzewiaceae Heterobasidion 35 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Ophiocordycipitaceae Hirsutella 50 0.02%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ajellomycetaceae Histoplasma 1379 0.62%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Teratosphaeriaceae Hortaea 213 0.10%
Monoblepharidomycetes Monoblepharidales Hyaloraphidium 3105 1.39%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Hyaloscyphaceae Hyaloscypha 33 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Hygrophoropsidaceae Hygrophoropsis 30 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Hypoxylaceae Hypomontagnella 12 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Hypocreaceae Hypomyces 61 0.03%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Hypoxylaceae Hypoxylon 196 0.09%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Hypsizygus 114 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Nectriaceae Ilyonectria 270 0.12%
Agaricomycetes Hymenochaetales Hymenochaetaceae Inonotus 39 0.02%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytridiaceae Irineochytrium 257 0.12%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Irpicaceae Irpex 89 0.04%
Agaricomycetes Jaapiales Jaapiaceae Jaapia 65 0.03%
Endogonomycetes Endogonales Endogonaceae Jimgerdemannia 61 0.03%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Juglanconidaceae Juglanconis 1238 0.55%
Sordariomycetes Microascales Microascaceae Kernia 297 0.13%
Tremellomycetes Tremellales Cryptococcaceae Kwoniella 267 0.12%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Hydnangiaceae Laccaria 54 0.02%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycetales Saccharomycetaceae Lachancea 496 0.22%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Laetiporaceae Laetiporus 47 0.02%
Lecanoromycetes Umbilicariales Umbilicariaceae Lasallia 24 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Omphalotaceae Lentinula 57 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Polyporaceae Lentinus 77 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Lentitheciaceae Lentithecium 82 0.04%
Dothideomycetes Mytilinidiales Argynnaceae Lepidopterella 70 0.03%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Leptodontidiaceae Leptodontidium 1666 0.75%
Sordariomycetes Ophiostomatales Ophiostomataceae Leptographium 52 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Leucogyrophana 188 0.08%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Lichtheimiaceae Lichtheimia 561 0.25%
Kickxellomycetes Kickxellales Kickxellaceae Linderina 42 0.02%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Linnemannia 1196 0.54%
Lipomycetes Lipomycetales Lipomycetaceae Lipomyces 9 0.00%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Lobosporangium 21 0.01%
Chytridiomycetes Lobulomycetales Lobulomycetaceae Lobulomyces 19 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Microascales Microascaceae Lomentospora 38 0.02%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Lophiotremataceae Lophiotrema 28 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Lyophyllum 60 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Botryosphaeriales Botryosphaeriaceae Macrophomina 1885 0.84%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Madurella 6366 2.85%
Dipodascomycetes Dipodascales Dipodascaceae Magnusiomyces 92 0.04%
Malasseziomycetes Malasseziales Malasseziaceae Malassezia 236 0.11%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Entomophthoraceae Massospora 25 0.01%
Exobasidiomycetes Exobasidiales Brachybasidiaceae Meira 434 0.19%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Clavicipitaceae Metarhizium 340 0.15%
Pichiomycetes Serinales Metschnikowiaceae Metschnikowia 40 0.02%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Ancylistaceae Microconidiobolus 198 0.09%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Microdochiaceae Microdochium 31 0.01%
Mitosporidium 933 0.42%
Mixiomycetes Mixiales Mixiaceae Mixia 11 0.00%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Clavicipitaceae Moelleriella 104 0.05%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Mollisiaceae Mollisia 19 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Aspergillaceae Monascus 147 0.07%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Sclerotiniaceae Monilinia 771 0.35%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Marasmiaceae Moniliophthora 71 0.03%
Monoblepharidomycetes Monoblepharidales Monoblepharidaceae Monoblepharella 512 0.23%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Monosporascus 144 0.06%
Pezizomycetes Pezizales Morchellaceae Morchella 1020 0.46%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Mortierella 855 0.38%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Mucor 1315 0.59%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Mycenaceae Mycena 797 0.36%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Mycothermus 12 0.01%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mycotyphaceae Mycotypha 63 0.03%
Tremellomycetes Filobasidiales Filobasidiaceae Naganishia 22 0.01%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycetales Saccharomycetaceae Nakaseomyces 59 0.03%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Arthrodermataceae Nannizzia 30 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Nemania 71 0.03%
Nematocida 225 0.10%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Apiosporaceae Neoarthrinium 100 0.04%
Neocallimastigomycetes Neocallimastigales Neocallimastigaceae Neocallimastix 50 0.02%
Entomophthoromycetes Entomophthorales Ancylistaceae Neoconidiobolus 14 0.01%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Teratosphaeriaceae Neohortaea 48 0.02%
Neolectomycetes Neolectales Neolectaceae Neolecta 41 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Sporocadaceae Neopestalotiopsis 106 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Sordariaceae Neurospora 619 0.28%
Nosematidae Nosema 382 0.17%
Chytridiomycetes Cladochytriales Nowakowskiellaceae Nowakowskiella 175 0.08%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytriomycetaceae Obelidium 20 0.01%
Pichiomycetes Pichiales Pichiaceae Ogataea 13 0.01%
Olpidiomycetes Olpidiales Olpidiaceae Olpidium 98 0.04%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Ophiocordycipitaceae Ophiocordyceps 858 0.38%
Sordariomycetes Diaporthales Gnomoniaceae Ophiognomonia 456 0.20%
Sordariomycetes Ophiostomatales Ophiostomataceae Ophiostoma 799 0.36%
Orbiliomycetes Orbiliales Orbiliaceae Orbilia 1955 0.88%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Thermoascaceae Paecilomyces 1119 0.50%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Galeropsidaceae Panaeolus 197 0.09%
Pancytospora 92 0.04%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Panaceae Panus 17 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Ajellomycetaceae Paracoccidioides 392 0.18%
Glomeromycetes Paraglomerales Paraglomeraceae Paraglomus 360 0.16%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Ophiocordycipitaceae Paraisaria 40 0.02%
Paramicrosporidium 6046 2.71%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Stachybotryaceae Paramyrothecium 16 0.01%
Physodermatomycetes Physodermatales Physodermataceae Paraphysoderma 353 0.16%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Parasitella 602 0.27%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Paxillaceae Paxillus 56 0.02%
Lecanoromycetes Peltigerales Peltigeraceae Peltigera 188 0.08%
Lichinomycetes Lichinales Phylliscaceae Peltula 78 0.04%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Aspergillaceae Penicilliopsis 539 0.24%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Aspergillaceae Penicillium 1845 0.83%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Peniophoraceae Peniophora 312 0.14%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Sporocadaceae Pestalotiopsis 191 0.09%
Tremellomycetes Cystofilobasidiales Mrakiaceae Phaffia 16 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Phanerochaetaceae Phanerochaete 207 0.09%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Lichtheimiaceae Phascolomyces 14 0.01%
Eurotiomycetes Chaetothyriales Herpotrichiellaceae Phialophora 19 0.01%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytridiaceae Phlyctochytrium 822 0.37%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Strophariaceae Pholiota 53 0.02%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Phycomycetaceae Phycomyces 96 0.04%
Lichinomycetes Lichinales Phylliscaceae Phylliscum 38 0.02%
Lecanoromycetes Caliciales Physciaceae Physcia 30 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Meripilaceae Physisporinus 243 0.11%
Pichiomycetes Pichiales Pichiaceae Pichia 111 0.05%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Pilaira 29 0.01%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Pilobolaceae Pilobolus 61 0.03%
Zoopagomycetes Zoopagales Piptocephalidaceae Piptocephalis 65 0.03%
Neocallimastigomycetes Neocallimastigales Neocallimastigaceae Piromyces 619 0.28%
Sordariomycetes Glomerellales Plectosphaerellaceae Plectosphaerella 1257 0.56%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Leptosphaeriaceae Plenodomus 25 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Pleurotaceae Pleurotus 18 0.01%
Pneumocystomycetes Pneumocystales Pneumocystaceae Pneumocystis 72 0.03%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Clavicipitaceae Pochonia 106 0.05%
Mortierellomycetes Mortierellales Mortierellaceae Podila 73 0.03%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytriomycetaceae Podochytrium 12 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Erysiphales Erysiphaceae Podosphaera 161 0.07%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Podosporaceae Podospora 2356 1.06%
Chytridiomycetes Polychytriales Polychytrium 248 0.11%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Tetraplosphaeriaceae Polyplosphaeria 47 0.02%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Polyrhizophydium 73 0.03%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Polytolypa 74 0.03%
Chytridiomycetes Spizellomycetales Powellomycetaceae Powellomyces 264 0.12%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Mycosphaerellaceae Pseudocercospora 14 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Thelebolales Thelebolaceae Pseudogymnoascus 819 0.37%
Pseudoloma 48 0.02%
Ustilaginomycetes Ustilaginales Ustilaginaceae Pseudozyma 24 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Strophariaceae Psilocybe 561 0.25%
Pucciniomycetes Pucciniales Pucciniaceae Puccinia 483 0.22%
Pezizomycetes Pezizales Pyronemataceae Pyronema 306 0.14%
Chytridiomycetes Quaeritorhizaceae Quaeritorhiza 1731 0.78%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Gigasporaceae Racocetra 299 0.13%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Radiomycetaceae Radiomyces 61 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Gomphales Gomphaceae Ramaria 103 0.05%
Ramicandelaberales Ramicandelaberaceae Ramicandelaber 34 0.02%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Mycosphaerellaceae Ramularia 62 0.03%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Trichocomaceae Rasamsonia 4036 1.81%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales Chytriomycetaceae Rhizoclosmatium 962 0.43%
Agaricomycetes Cantharellales Ceratobasidiaceae Rhizoctonia 758 0.34%
Dothideomycetes Aulographales Rhizodiscinaceae Rhizodiscina 15 0.01%
Glomeromycetes Glomerales Glomeraceae Rhizophagus 4204 1.88%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophlyctidales Rhizophlyctidaceae Rhizophlyctis 462 0.21%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Rhizopogonaceae Rhizopogon 47 0.02%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Rhizopodaceae Rhizopus 19211 8.61%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Omphalotaceae Rhodocollybia 33 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Fomitopsidaceae Rhodofomes 117 0.05%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Adustoporiaceae Rhodonia 493 0.22%
Microbotryomycetes Sporidiobolales Sporidiobolaceae Rhodotorula 107 0.05%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Rosellinia 154 0.07%
Rozella 462 0.21%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Russulaceae Russula 942 0.42%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Rutstroemiaceae Rutstroemia 38 0.02%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycetales Saccharomycetaceae Saccharomyces 542 0.24%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycodales Saccharomycodaceae Saccharomycodes 31 0.01%
Saitoella 284 0.13%
Tremellomycetes Tremellales Trimorphomycetaceae Saitozyma 792 0.35%
Agaricomycetes Hymenochaetales Hymenochaetaceae Sanghuangporus 202 0.09%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Schizophyllaceae Schizophyllum 100 0.04%
Agaricomycetes Hymenochaetales Schizoporaceae Schizopora 42 0.02%
Schizosaccharomycetes Schizosaccharomycetales Schizosaccharomycetaceae Schizosaccharomyces 22 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Sclerodermataceae Scleroderma 28 0.01%
Coniocybomycetes Coniocybales Coniocybaceae Sclerophora 198 0.09%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Sclerotiniaceae Sclerotinia 281 0.13%
Sordariomycetes Microascales Microascaceae Scopulariopsis 1907 0.85%
Glomeromycetes Diversisporales Gigasporaceae Scutellospora 21 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Scytalidium 740 0.33%
Agaricomycetes Sebacinales Serendipitaceae Serendipita 345 0.15%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Serpulaceae Serpula 23 0.01%
Harpellomycetes Harpellales Legeriomycetaceae Smittium 423 0.19%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Sordariaceae Sordaria 752 0.34%
Agaricomycetes Geastrales Sphaerobolaceae Sphaerobolus 88 0.04%
Pezizomycetes Pezizales Pyronemataceae Sphaerosporella 13 0.01%
Kickxellomycetes Kickxellales Kickxellaceae Spiromyces 77 0.03%
Chytridiomycetes Spizellomycetales Spizellomycetaceae Spizellomyces 123 0.06%
Dothideomycetes Pleosporales Massarinaceae Stagonospora 24 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Staphylotrichum 350 0.16%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Strophariaceae Stropharia 181 0.08%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Suillaceae Suillus 313 0.14%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Syncephalastraceae Syncephalastrum 51 0.02%
Zoopagomycetes Zoopagales Piptocephalidaceae Syncephalis 781 0.35%
Chytridiomycetes Synchytriales Synchytriaceae Synchytrium 187 0.08%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Trichocomaceae Talaromyces 2651 1.19%
Taphrinomycetes Taphrinales Taphrinaceae Taphrina 30 0.01%
Dothideomycetes Mycosphaerellales Teratosphaeriaceae Teratosphaeria 2041 0.91%
Pezizomycetes Pezizales Pezizaceae Terfezia 47 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Termitomyces 1006 0.45%
Chytridiomycetes Rhizophydiales Terramycetaceae Terramyces 37 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Marasmiaceae Tetrapyrgos 183 0.08%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Mucoraceae Thamnidium 125 0.06%
Lecanoromycetes Thelocarpales Thelocarpaceae Thelocarpon 22 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Thermochaetoides 2930 1.31%
Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Trichocomaceae Thermomyces 172 0.08%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Thermothelomyces 1758 0.79%
Sordariomycetes Sordariales Chaetomiaceae Thermothielavioides 1116 0.50%
Sordariomycetes Chaetosphaeriales Chaetosphaeriaceae Thozetella 28 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Thyridiaceae Thyridium 317 0.14%
Exobasidiomycetes Tilletiales Tilletiaceae Tilletia 100 0.04%
Exobasidiomycetes Entylomatales Tilletiopsis 14 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Ophiocordycipitaceae Tolypocladium 23 0.01%
Saccharomycetes Saccharomycetales Saccharomycetaceae Torulaspora 69 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Venturiales Cylindrosympodiaceae Tothia 477 0.21%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Polyporaceae Trametes 723 0.32%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Irpicaceae Trametopsis 16 0.01%
Tremellomycetes Tremellales Tremellaceae Tremella 70 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Phaeotrichales Phaeotrichaceae Trichodelitschia 28 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Hypocreales Hypocreaceae Trichoderma 2559 1.15%
Geoglossomycetes Geoglossales Geoglossaceae Trichoglossum 49 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Lyophyllaceae Tricholomella 37 0.02%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Arthrodermataceae Trichophyton 149 0.07%
Tremellomycetes Trichosporonales Trichosporonaceae Trichosporon 33 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Helotiaceae Tricladium 24 0.01%
Pezizomycetes Pezizales Tuberaceae Tuber 764 0.34%
Tubulinosematidae Tubulinosema 15 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Cantharellales Tulasnellaceae Tulasnella 303 0.14%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Psathyrellaceae Tulosesus 73 0.03%
Agaricomycetes Boletales Boletaceae Tylopilus 446 0.20%
Umbelopsidomycetes Umbelopsidales Umbelopsidaceae Umbelopsis 234 0.10%
Eurotiomycetes Onygenales Onygenaceae Uncinocarpus 15 0.01%
Ustilaginomycetes Ustilaginales Ustilaginaceae Ustilago 434 0.19%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Ustulina 74 0.03%
Nosematidae Vairimorpha 27 0.01%
Tremellomycetes Trichosporonales Trichosporonaceae Vanrija 53 0.02%
Agaricomycetes Russulales Lachnocladiaceae Vararia 11 0.00%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Discinellaceae Varicosporium 31 0.01%
Dothideomycetes Venturiales Venturiaceae Venturia 59 0.03%
Leotiomycetes Helotiales Pleuroascaceae Venustampulla 126 0.06%
Dothideomycetes Venturiales Sympoventuriaceae Verruconis 20 0.01%
Sordariomycetes Glomerellales Plectosphaerellaceae Verticillium 231 0.10%
Nosematidae Vittaforma 30 0.01%
Agaricomycetes Agaricales Pluteaceae Volvariella 17 0.01%
Wallemiomycetes Wallemiales Wallemiaceae Wallemia 1304 0.58%
Lichinomycetes Lichinales Porocyphaceae Watsoniomyces 33 0.01%
Dipodascomycetes Dipodascales Trichomonascaceae Wickerhamiella 83 0.04%
Saccharomycetes Phaffomycetales Wickerhamomycetaceae Wickerhamomyces 181 0.08%
Agaricomycetes Polyporales Phaeolaceae Wolfiporia 44 0.02%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Xylaria 591 0.26%
Sordariomycetes Xylariales Xylariaceae Xylariaceae 31 0.01%
Leotiomycetes Xylogone 108 0.05%
Pichiomycetes Serinales Debaryomycetaceae Yamadazyma 22 0.01%
Harpellomycetes Harpellales Legeriomycetaceae Zancudomyces 65 0.03%
Dothideomycetes Zopfiaceae Zopfia 117 0.05%
Mucoromycetes Mucorales Lichtheimiaceae Zychaea 48 0.02%
Eurotiomycetes Chaetothyriales 69 0.03%
Chytridiomycetes Chytridiales 62 0.03%

Amongst the 13 most abundant genera, Rhizophagus (an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus - AMF) is the only one without published reports linking it directly to composting. However, its presence in soil is well documented and studies have shown that compost addition stimulates hyphal growth and sporulation, benefiting multiple crops (Yang et al. 2018, Boutasknit et al. 2020, Tahiri et al. 2022). Rhizophagus, an obligate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), requires a living plant host for active growth (Smith and Read 2008). These fungi produce resistant spores capable of persisting in soil and plant residues and may be introduced into compost through yard trimmings or soil particles (Aguilar-Paredes et al. 2023). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing detects environmental DNA (eDNA) irrespective of metabolic state. Nevertheless, the observed relative abundance of 1.88% (within Fungi) suggests that additional factors may be involved beyond the mechanisms currently identified. The potential survival of AMF propagules during composting may have implications for the agricultural use of the final product.

Amongst the detected taxa (Monjardino et al. 2025), some correspond to host-specific or host-obligate parasites, including human-associated Pneumocystis jirovecii (Cissé et al. 2020), insect-associated Entomophthora muscae and Massospora cicadina (Elya and De Fine Licht 2021), amphibian-associated Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Martel et al. 2013) and amoeba-associated Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae (Quandt et al. 2017). Shotgun metagenomics identifies DNA fragments based on sequence similarity and does not discriminate amongst active organisms, dormant propagules or residual environmental DNA. Their detection may, therefore, reflect resistant spores, residual host material introduced through garden trimmings, undetected microscopic hosts or taxonomic assignments to closely-related environmental lineages. However, for relatively abundant taxa, such as Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (RA = 0.59%) and Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae (RA = 2.71%) and, given that their known host species were not identified, additional factors may account for their presence in the composting material. These findings highlight the complexity of compost-associated microbial diversity and warrant further ecological investigation.

Although composting typically requires no inoculation, several studies demonstrated positive effects of fungal amendments, despite fungi often being amongst the least abundant microbial groups (He et al. 2022). Different taxa have been inoculated for: (i) detoxification of inhibitory compounds, for example, supplementation with Paecilomyces sp. FA13 enhances the degradation of furan derivatives during food waste pretreatment (Nakasaki et al. 2015); (ii) lignocellulose degradation and humification, with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatum increasing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin breakdown, while elevating humus and humic acid content, all of which were also detected in our samples (Table 2); and (iii) synergistic effects with other microbes, such as inoculation with thermotolerant actinomycetes, which accelerates humification and increases humic substance content by 50–100% (Zhao et al. 2017).

Most of the fungi listed in Table 2 are relevant to composting. Based on previous studies and their relative abundances (> 0.5% of classified reads), three main functional groups emerge with the greatest potential for agricultural applications: (i) biocontrol fungi (Trichoderma, Chaetomium, Aureobasidium, Penicillium, Paecilomyces); (ii) mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus, Diversispora, Ambispora) and (iii) nutrient cyclers and decomposers (Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Mucor, Podospora, Thermothelomyces, Linnemannia). The remaining genera detected were either pathogenic or of limited agricultural value.

In summary, this study provides a shotgun metagenomic inventory of fungal taxa detected across composting stages, documenting their relative read abundance and reinforcing the ecological and agricultural relevance of fungal communities within compost systems.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307, financed by FEDER and Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM. Additionally, the Biotechnology Centre of Azores financed the Open Access for this publication (FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05292/2025 DOI https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05292/2025 and from the Azorean Regional Directorate of Science, Innovation and Development, through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System, Ref. M1.1 A/FUNC.UI&D/016/2025). PAVB was funded by FCT through national and European funds by UID/00329/2023 - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C) and Regional Directorate for Science, Innovation and Development [Regional Government of the Azores] through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System (M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/021/2025 [UI&D/GBA/2025]). The data here published will be also put available in AZORES BIOPORTAL under the supervion of PAVB.

The authors also wish to express their gratitude to Teramb for providing the field equipment to carry out part of this work and to Cátia Pereira for supervising the compost production site during this experiment.

Funding Statement

The research was funded by VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307

Author contributions

P.M.: Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition, project administration, Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, writing —original draft; A.R.A.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing — review and editing; D.M.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing — review and editing; G.P.: Data curation, Writing — review and editing; P.A.V.B.: Methodology, Writing — review and editing; J.F.: Data curation, Writing — review and editing; D.T.: Conceptualisation, Methodology; Investigation, Data curation, Validation, Writing — review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aguilar-Paredes Ana, Valdés Gabriela, Araneda Nicole, Valdebenito Emky, Hansen Felipe, Nuti Marco. Microbial community in the composting process and its positive impact on the soil biota in sustainable agriculture. Agronomy. 2023;13(2) doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad A., Haq T., Karim A., Saleem M., Hasan K. A., Liaqat I., Zafar U. Designing of phosphate rich compost inoculated with environmental strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAC1 as a phosphate solubilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2024;22(11):10029–10048. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-06278-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anastasi Antonella, Varese Giovanna Cristina, Filipello Marchisio Valeria. Isolation and identification of fungal communities in compost and vermicompost. Mycologia. 2017;97(1):33–44. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Awasthi Sanjeev Kumar, Verma Shivpal, Liu Tao, Awasthi Mukesh Kumar, Zhang Zengqiang, Syed Asad, Bahkali Ali H. Regulation of fungal communities during pig manure composting. Bioresource Technology. 2023;389 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boutasknit Abderrahim, Ait-Rahou Youssef, Anli Mohamed, Ait-El-Mokhtar Mohamed, Ben-Laouane Raja, Meddich Abdelilah. Improvement of garlic growth, physiology, biochemical traits, and soil fertility by Rhizophagus irregularis and compost. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2020;73(2):149–160. doi: 10.1007/s10343-020-00533-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cai Linlin, Gong Xiaoqiang, Sun Xiangyang, Li Suyan, Yu Xin. Comparison of chemical and microbiological changes during the aerobic composting and vermicomposting of green waste. PLOS One. 2018;13(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cissé Ousmane H., Ma Liang, Jiang Chao, Snyder Michael, Kovacs Joseph A. Humans are selectively exposed to Pneumocystis jirovecii. mBio. 2020;11(2) doi: 10.1128/mbio.03138-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elya Carolyn, De Fine Licht Henrik H. The genus Entomophthora: bringing the insect destroyers into the twenty-first century. IMA Fungus. 2021;12(1) doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00084-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. He Jing, Zhu Nengmin, Xu Yansheng, Wang Li, Zheng Jiaqiang, Li Xia. The microbial mechanisms of enhanced humification by inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatum during biogas residues composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;351 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoang Son A., Bolan Nanthi, Madhubashani A. M.P., Vithanage Meththika, Perera Vishma, Wijesekara Hasintha, Wang Hailong, Srivastava Prashant, Kirkham M. B., Mickan Bede S., Rinklebe Jörg, Siddique Kadambot H. M. Treatment processes to eliminate potential environmental hazards and restore agronomic value of sewage sludge: A review. Environmental Pollution. 2022;293 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kidd Sarah E, Abdolrasouli Alireza, Hagen Ferry. Fungal nomenclature: Managing change is the name of the game. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2023;10(1) doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lin Long, Xu Fuqing, Ge Xumeng, Li Yebo. Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;89:151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu Xin, Rong Xiangmin, Jiang Pan, Yang Junyan, Li Han, Yang Yong, Deng Xingxiang, Xie Guixian, Luo Gongwen. Biodiversity and core microbiota of key-stone ecological clusters regulate compost maturity during cow-dung-driven composting. Environmental Research. 2024;245 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu Mengling, Hao Yuhao, Lin Binfeng, Huang Zhi, Zhang Yu, Chen Liang, Li Kai, Li Jianbin. The bioaugmentation effect of microbial inoculants on humic acid formation during co-composting of bagasse and cow manure. Environmental Research. 2024;252 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mahongnao Sophayo, Sharma Pooja, Nanda Sarita. Characterization of fungal microbiome structure in leaf litter compost through metagenomic profiling for harnessing the bio-organic fertilizer potential. 3 Biotech. 2024;14(9) doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04028-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martel An, Spitzen-van der Sluijs Annemarieke, Blooi Mark, Bert Wim, Ducatelle Richard, Fisher Matthew C., Woeltjes Antonius, Bosman Wilbert, Chiers Koen, Bossuyt Franky, Pasmans Frank. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans sp. nov. causes lethal chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(38):15325–15329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307356110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martins Layla Farage, Antunes Luciana Principal, Pascon Renata C., de Oliveira Julio Cezar Franco, Digiampietri Luciano A., Barbosa Deibs, Peixoto Bruno Malveira, Vallim Marcelo A., Viana-Niero Cristina, Ostroski Eric H., Telles Guilherme P., Dias Zanoni, da Cruz João Batista, Juliano Luiz, Verjovski-Almeida Sergio, da Silva Aline Maria, Setubal João Carlos. Correction: Metagenomic analysis of a tropical composting operation at the São Paulo Zoo Park reveals diversity of biomass degradation functions and organisms. PLOS One. 2013;8(6) doi: 10.1371/annotation/2cca811e-d45b-4854-a420-d0405309ef43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mello Bruno L., Alessi Anna M., Riaño-Pachón Diego M., deAzevedo Eduardo R., Guimarães Francisco E. G., Espirito Santo Melissa C., McQueen-Mason Simon, Bruce Neil C., Polikarpov Igor. Targeted metatranscriptomics of compost-derived consortia reveals a GH11 exerting an unusual exo-1,4-β-xylanase activity. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2017;10(1) doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0944-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mengesha W. K., Gill W. M., Powell S. M., Evans K. J., Barry K. M. A study of selected factors affecting efficacy of compost tea against several fungal pathogens of potato. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2017;123(3):732–747. doi: 10.1111/jam.13530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Monjardino P., R. Azevedo; A., Mendonça D., Pozsgai G., Borges P. A. V., Frias J., Toubarro D. GBIF; 2026. [2026-02-27T00:53:10+00:00]. Metagenomic survey of compost fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago) 1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakasaki Kiyohiko, Mimoto Hiroshi, Tran Quyen Ngoc Minh, Oinuma Akiko. Composting of food waste subjected to hydrothermal pretreatment and inoculated with Paecilomyces sp. FA13. Bioresource Technology. 2015;180:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. NCBI NCBI Taxonomy Browser. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi. [2025-08-18T00:53:10+00:00]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi
  23. NOVOGENE Shotgun metagenomic sequencing. https://www.novogene.com/us-en/services/research-services/metagenome-sequencing/shotgun-metagenomic-sequencing/#overview. [2025-03-28T00:24:57+00:00]. https://www.novogene.com/us-en/services/research-services/metagenome-sequencing/shotgun-metagenomic-sequencing/#overview
  24. Quandt C Alisha, Beaudet Denis, Corsaro Daniele, Walochnik Julia, Michel Rolf, Corradi Nicolas, James Timothy Y. The genome of an intranuclear parasite, Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae, reveals alternative adaptations to obligate intracellular parasitism. eLife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/elife.29594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Quince Christopher, Walker Alan W, Simpson Jared T, Loman Nicholas J, Segata Nicola. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35(9):833–844. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sebők Flóra, Dobolyi Csaba, Bobvos János, Szoboszlay Sándor, Kriszt Balázs, Magyar Donát. Thermophilic fungi in air samples in surroundings of compost piles of municipal, agricultural and horticultural origin. Aerobiologia. 2015;32(2):255–263. doi: 10.1007/s10453-015-9396-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith S. E., Read D. J. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd Edition. Academic Press; Cambridge: 2008. 787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tahiri Abdel-ilah, Raklami Anas, Bechtaoui Noura, Anli Mohamed, Boutasknit Abderrahim, Oufdou Khalid, Meddich Abdelilah. Beneficial effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growth under field conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2022;74(1):219–235. doi: 10.1007/s10343-021-00604-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tarpani Raphael Ricardo Zepon, Alfonsín Carolina, Hospido Almudena, Azapagic Adisa. Life cycle environmental impacts of sewage sludge treatment methods for resource recovery considering ecotoxicity of heavy metals and pharmaceutical and personal care products. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;260 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tuomela M, Vikman M, Hatakka A, Itävaara M. Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: a review. Bioresource Technology. 2000;72(2):169–183. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00104-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vallejo-Arróliga Mónica, Rojas-Jimenez Keilor. Yeasts of Pichia (Pichiaceae) dominate the mycobiome of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae during urban composting. Revista de Biología Tropical. 2024;72(1) doi: 10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.57898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Varma Vempalli Sudharsan, Das Suminakshi, Sastri Chivukula V., Kalamdhad Ajay S. Microbial degradation of lignocellulosic fractions during drum composting of mixed organic waste. Sustainable Environment Research. 2017;27(6):265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.serj.2017.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang Hongye, Shankar Vijay, Jiang Xiuping. Compositional and functional changes in microbial communities of composts due to the composting-related factors and the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022;10(4) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01845-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang Wei, Gu Siyu, Xin Ying, Bello Ayodeji, Sun Wenpeng, Xu Xiuhong. Compost addition eHyphal growth and sporulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi without affecting their composition in the soil. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yu Shilin, Deng Shuanghui, Zhou Ao, Wang Xuebin, Tan Houzhang. Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emission for sewage sludge treatment and disposal: a review. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1123972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yu Zhongtang, Morrison Mark. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. BioTechniques. 2018;36(5):808–812. doi: 10.2144/04365st04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao Yi, Zhao Yue, Zhang Zhechao, Wei Yuquan, Wang Huan, Lu Qian, Li Yanjie, Wei Zimin. Effect of thermo-tolerant actinomycetes inoculation on cellulose degradation and the formation of humic substances during composting. Waste Management. 2017;68:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Research Zymo. Quick DNA Miniprep Plus Kit. http://www.zymoresearch.com/dna/genomic-dna/cell-soft-tissue-dna/quick-dna-miniprep-plus-kit. [2023-02-13T00:53:10+00:00]. http://www.zymoresearch.com/dna/genomic-dna/cell-soft-tissue-dna/quick-dna-miniprep-plus-kit

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES