Abstract
Background
Composting converts organic residues into stable organic matter and nutrients under aerobic conditions, improving soil properties and microbiome balance, while mitigating environmental impacts. Although microbiomes of various compost types have been studied, information is still fragmented and often not tailored to specific raw material combinations. In particular, little is known about the fungal communities involved in composting dairy plant wastewater sludge mixed with garden trimmings. This data paper contributes to filling that gap by providing a comprehensive taxonomic inventory.
New information
We provide a fungus-focused dataset from 18 compost samples generated from a 1:1 (w/w) mix of garden trimmings and dairy plant wastewater sludge, collected at three process stages (thermophilic start/end; mid-cooling and maturation) under two turning regimes. Shotgun metagenomes were taxonomically annotated against NCBI taxonomy (accessed 19 Feb 2025). Only Fungi were detected within Eukarya, spanning nine phyla; Ascomycota (60.8%), Mucoromycota (17.76%), Basidiomycota (8.50%) and Chytridiomycota (7.21%) comprised 94.27% of the taxonomic features. We report 417 genera (13 >1% relative abundance each); top: Aspergillus (17.93%), Rhizopus (8.61%), Chaetomium (4.83%), Aureobasidium (3.09%), Madurella (2.85%), Paramicrosporidium (2.71%), Rhizophagus (1.88%), Rasamsonia (1.81%), Hyaloraphidium (1.39%), Thermochaetoides (1.31%), Talaromyces (1.19%), Trichoderma (1.15%), Podospora (1.06%) comprised 49.81% of the taxonomic feature abundance. Overall 663 taxa were identified (578 species, 416 genera, 230 families, 106 orders, 48 classes and 9 phyla). The dataset (DwCA; 663 occurrences) is intended to serve as a reference for compost mycobiomes and will be available via GBIF (DOI 10.15468/nmpzwr).
Keywords: Thermophilic, cooling and maturation, garden trimmings, wastewater sludge, microbiome
Introduction
Composting is an aerobic process, in which microorganisms decompose organic matter into more stable compounds. The resulting product can be applied in agriculture as an organic fertiliser that improves soil physical properties, enriches the microbiome and enhances crop health while also contributing to nutrient recycling. In addition, composting reduces the environmental impact of organic residue accumulation and lowers sanitary risks through the pasteurisation effect of the thermophilic stage, which eliminates most coliform bacteria (Lin et al. 2018).
Sewage sludge, when co-composted with lignocellulosic materials, produces a stabilied, nutrient-enriched product. Nitrogen-rich wastes, such as food residues, manure and sewage sludge (C/N = 10–20), are typically combined with carbon-rich biomass (C/N > 50), which balances the C/N ratio and improves aeration while reducing leachate (Lin et al. 2018, Tarpani et al. 2020, Hoang et al. 2022). Composting also facilitates the dissipation of organic contaminants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pharmaceuticals, antibiotic-resistance genes and microplastics (Hoang et al. 2022).
Compared with anaerobic digestion, lime treatment, pyrolysis or incineration, composting offers several advantages, including nutrient recovery, low investment and operational costs, suitability for small- and medium-scale facilities and the potential to substitute chemical fertilisers. However, disadvantages include variable greenhouse gas emissions, high energy demand, requirement for large processing areas, limited volume reduction and no energy recovery (Hoang et al. 2022, Yu et al. 2023).
Microbial activity during composting is stage-dependent: bacteria dominate during the mesophilic and thermophilic phases, whereas fungi become more active during cooling and maturation (Tuomela et al. 2000). Labile compounds, such as sugars, starch, amino acids and lipids, are degraded early, releasing CO₂ and ammonia, whereas more recalcitrant polymers (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) are broken down later, contributing to humus formation. Fungi play a particularly important role due to their extracellular enzyme production, which enables the degradation of complex polymers and facilitates microbial interactions within compost piles (Awasthi et al. 2023).
General description
Purpose
This dataset provides information on the fungal community associated with the composting process. Composting is a biologically driven degradation process in which organic matter is transformed into a stable and nutrient-rich product. Fungi play an essential role in this process because of their ability to degrade complex polymers such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, thereby accelerating organic matter decomposition and influencing the final quality of compost. The dataset was generated to document the diversity and taxonomic composition of fungi present in the composting material. The present Data Paper does not aim to evaluate treatment and compost stage effects (which will be addressed in a future article), but rather to provide baseline information for applied microbiology, waste management and soil fertility studies.
Project description
Title
Metagenomic Survey of Compost Fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago)
Personnel
The project was conceived by Paulo Monjardino.
Fieldwork: Cátia Pereira, Paulo Monjardino.
Database management: Paulo Monjardino.
Darwin Core Database management: Paulo A. V. Borges & Paulo Monjardino.
Funding
VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307, FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05292/2025 DOI https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05292/2025 and from the Azorean Regional Directorate of Science, Innovation and Development, through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System, Ref. M1.1. A/FUNC.UI&D/016/2025).
Sampling methods
Sampling description
Compost Production
Composting was performed at an open-air, industrial-scale facility operated by Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM (38.67583° N, −27.17433° W). Wastewater sludge from a dairy processing plant was mixed with garden trimmings at a 1:1 (w/w) ratio. Garden trimmings were made of trees and shrubs branches (no more than 15 cm diameter), palm leaves, grass cuttings and garden herbaceous ornamentals. Two windrow-turning regimes were applied: (i) triweekly during the thermophilic stage and weekly during the cooling and maturation stages and (ii) once every three weeks throughout all stages.
Sample Collection and DNA Extraction
Samples were collected at the beginning and end of the thermophilic stage and at the mid-cooling and maturation. Material was obtained by digging 50–60 cm into the piles, ≈ 1 m above the ground, from three zones (external and middle) and bulked into composite samples. Each sample (200–300 g) was placed in a sterile bag and transported to the laboratory.
Samples were homogenied in PBS (pH 7.4), centrifuged, and the pellets were stored at −80 °C. Metagenomic DNA was extracted using the repeated bead-beating method (Yu and Morrison 2018) combined with a Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research 2017). DNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and stored at −20 °C.
Shotgun Sequencing
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed by Novogene (Cambridge, UK) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), which provides high accuracy, scalability, and sequencing depth for complex microbiome studies (NOVOGENE 2023).
Genomic DNA (200 ng) was randomly sheared into ≈ 350 bp fragments using a Covaris ultrasonic disruptor. Libraries were prepared using Novogene NGS DNA Library Prep Set (Cat. No. PT004). Briefly, the fragmented DNA underwent end repair and A-tailing to produce blunt ends with adenine overhangs, followed by ligation of Illumina sequencing adapters containing unique barcodes. Size selection was performed to retain fragments of 350–450 bp by using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). To enrich adapter-ligated fragments, PCR amplification was carried out when DNA input was low; for high-input samples, PCR-free preparation was applied to minimise bias.
Library quality was verified by fragment integrity and insert size analysis (AATI) and the effective library concentration was quantified by qPCR (> 3 nM). Qualified libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with two-channel sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) chemistry. Paired-end sequencing (PE150) was employed to provide high-accuracy reads and improve the assembly performance, with error rates below 1%.
Bioinformatics Analysis
Raw reads were filtered using Trimmomatic v.0.39 to obtain high-quality clean data for downstream analysis. Reads from each sample were assembled individually to recover information from low-abundance species and the unused reads were pooled for mixed assembly using the metaSPAdes v.4.1.0 assembler. Gene prediction was carried out using MetaGeneMark v.3.25, based on the scaftigs that were assembled by single and mixed samples. The predicted genes were pooled and dereplicated to construct a non-redundant gene catalogue. Gene abundance for each sample was quantified by mapping reads back to this catalogue using a read mapper (Bowtie v.2.5.4). Taxonomic annotation was obtained for metagenomic reads against the microNR database, a curated collection of taxonomically informative gene families, using sequence alignment software called DIAMOND v.2.1.12. Taxon-specific abundance profiles were inferred from gene abundance estimates and aggregated to generate taxonomic feature tables at multiple taxonomic ranks. The taxonomic hierarchy of all fungal taxa was standardised and updated according to the NCBI Taxonomy database (accessed April 2025) using the taxize v.0.10.0 package in R v.4.5.1.
The data presented in this article originate from a composite analysis of 18 samples and represent the mean value across the entire sample set.
Geographic coverage
Description
Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal. Solid waste processing centre managed by Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM. In Terceira Island (Azores Archipelago).
Coordinates
38.676 and 38.676 Latitude; -27.174 and -27.174 Longitude.
Taxonomic coverage
Description
The following Phyla are covered: Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Cryptomycota, Microsporidia, Mucoromycota, Olpidiomycota, Zoopagomycota.
The following Classes are covered: Agaricomycetes, Arthoniomycetes, Basidiobolomycetes, Blastocladiomycetes, Candelariomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, Coniocybomycetes, Dacrymycetes, Dimargaritomycetes, Dipodascomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Endogonomycetes, Entomophthoromycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Exobasidiomycetes, Geoglossomycetes, Glomeromycetes, Harpellomycetes, Kickxellomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lichinomycetes, Lipomycetes, Malasseziomycetes, Microbotryomycetes, Mixiomycetes, Monoblepharidomycetes, Mortierellomycetes, Mucoromycetes, Neolectomycetes, Neocallimastigomycetes, Olpidiomycetes, Orbiliomycetes, Pezizomycetes, Physodermatomycetes, Pichiomycetes, Pneumocystomycetes, Pucciniomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Schizosaccharomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Taphrinomycetes, Tremellomycetes, Umbelopsidomycetes, Ustilaginomycetes, Wallemiomycetes, Xylobotryomycetes, Zoopagomycetes.
Taxa included
| Rank | Scientific Name | Common Name |
|---|---|---|
| kingdom | Fungi | Fungi |
Temporal coverage
Data range: 2022-3-14 – 2022-11-28.
Notes
The presented data were obtained from 18 samples collected between March 14, 2022 and November 28, 2022. DNA extraction was performed between March 8 and May 19, 2023, and sequencing analysis was completed in August 2023 (exact date unknown).
Usage licence
Usage licence
Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)
Data resources
Data package title
Metagenomic Survey of Compost Fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago)
Resource link
Alternative identifiers
https://www.gbif.org/dataset/e3b9f473-b41e-427e-89fc-990c973c8e05
Number of data sets
1
Data set 1.
Data set name
Occurrence Table
Data format
Darwin Core Archive
Character set
UTF-8
Download URL
Data format version
1.3
Description
The dataset was published in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility platform, GBIF (Monjardino et al. 2026). The following data-table includes all the records for which a taxonomic identification of the species was possible. The dataset submitted to GBIF is structured as a sample occurrence dataset that has been published as a Darwin Core Archive (DwCA), which is a standardised format for sharing biodiversity data as a set of one or more data tables. The core data file contains 663 records (eventID; and occurrenceID). This GBIF IPT (Integrated Publishing Toolkit, Version 2.5.6) archives the data and, thus, serves as the data repository. The data and resource metadata are available for download in the Portuguese GBIF Portal IPT (Monjardino et al. 2026).
Data set 1.
| Column label | Column description |
|---|---|
| id | Identifier generated by GBIF IPT. |
| type | The nature or genre of the resource. |
| licence | Reference to the licence under which the record is published. |
| institutionID | An identifier for the institution publishing the data. |
| institutionCode | The code of the institution publishing the data. |
| basisOfRecord | The nature of the data record (MaterialSample). |
| occurrenceID | Identifier of the record, coded as a global unique identifier. |
| recordedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who performed the sampling in the field. |
| organismQuantity | A number or enumeration value for the quantity of Organisms. |
| organismQuantityType | The type of quantification system used for the quantity of organisms. |
| eventID | Identifier of the events, unique for the dataset |
| eventDate | The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. |
| year | Year the sample was collected. |
| eventRemarks | Comments or notes about the dwc:Event. |
| habitat | The surveyed habitat, in this case, a waste management site. |
| samplingProtocol | The sampling protocol used to capture the species. |
| sampleSizeValue | A numeric value for a measurement of the size (time duration, length, area or volume) of a sample in a sampling dwc:Event. |
| sampleSizeUnit | The unit of measurement of the size (time duration, length, area or volume) of a sample in a sampling dwc:Event. |
| locationID | Identifier of the location. |
| islandGroup | The name of the island group in which the Location occurs (Azores Archipelago). |
| island | The name of the island on which the Location occurs (Terceira). |
| country | The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs (Portugal). |
| countryCode | The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs (PT). |
| stateProvince | The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
| municipality | The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than county (city, municipality etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
| locality | The specific description of the place. |
| minimumElevationInMetres | The lower limit of the range of elevation (altitude, usually above sea level), in metres. |
| decimalLatitude | Approximate centre point decimal latitude of the field site in GPS coordinates. |
| decimalLongitude | Approximate centre point decimal longitude of the field site in GPS coordinates. |
| geodeticDatum | Standard Global Positioning System coordinate reference for the location of the sample collection points. |
| coordinateUncertaintyInMetres | Uncertain value of coordinate metrics. |
| coordinatePrecision | Value in decimal degrees to a precision of six decimal places. |
| georeferenceSources | Navigation system used to record the location of sample collections. |
| identifiedBy | A list of names of people, groups or organisations who assigned the Taxon to the subject. |
| dateIdentified | The date on which the subject was determined as representing the Taxon. |
| identificationRemarks | Comments or notes about the dwc:Identification. |
| scientificName | The full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known. |
| kingdom | Kingdom name. |
| phylum | Phylum name. |
| class | Class name. |
| order | Order name. |
| family | Family name. |
| genus | Genus name. |
| specificEpithet | Specific epithet name. |
| taxonRank | Lowest taxonomic rank of the record. |
| scientificNameAuthorship | The authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode. |
Additional information
The microbiome analysis revealed four major groups: Eukarya, Archaea, Bacteria and Viruses (NCBI 2025). This study focuses exclusively on the Eukarya domain.
Within Eukarya, only the Fungi kingdom was detected, representing 0.01–0.1% of all taxonomic features and ranked as the least abundant group in 16 of the 18 compost samples. No other eukaryotic organisms (e.g. invertebrates, protozoa and algae) were detected. The absence of non-fungal eukaryotes in our dataset is likely related to strong ecological filtering during the thermophilic phase of composting. Temperatures during this stage commonly exceed 55–65°C, creating prolonged heat stress conditions that eliminate or severely reduce most non-spore-forming eukaryotes (Lin et al. 2018). Many fungal taxa are capable of surviving such conditions through thermotolerance mechanisms, rapid stress-response systems or the production of resistant structures such as spores (Tuomela et al. 2000). The thermophilic phase also accelerates organic matter degradation and alters oxygen availability and moisture dynamics, further restricting the establishment of other eukaryotic groups. Temperature-driven ecological filtering is a key determinant of compost microbial succession (Awasthi et al. 2023). The eukaryotic community may already have undergone strong selective filtering, resulting in the dominance of fungi. Aditionally, the very low overall proportion of Eukarya-derived reads (0.01–0.1%) suggests that other eukaryotic groups, if present, may fall below detection thresholds in shotgun metagenomic datasets dominated by bacterial and archaeal DNA (Quince et al. 2017).
Previous studies have similarly reported a relatively low abundance of fungi during composting (Martins et al. 2013, Wang et al. 2022, Aguilar-Paredes et al. 2023), suggesting that, while fungi contribute to the composting process, bacteria consistently dominate the microbial community. Although fungi represent a relatively small fraction of total metagenomic reads, their ecological importance in composting is disproportionate to their numerical abundance. Fungi are key degraders of recalcitrant polymers, such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin during both the thermophilic and subsequent cooling and maturation stages (Mello et al. 2017, Varma et al. 2017).
The present dataset provides an extensive inventory of fungal taxa identified in compost. While many have previously been reported in composting systems, others were not found in Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar or GBIF searches. This may reflect database limitations, as taxa not explicitly cited in titles, abstracts or indexed keywords are easily overlooked. Records from Google Scholar and GBIF can complement this gap, but require validation due to lower precision.
Another important consideration is the evolving state of fungal taxonomy. Over the past decade, major revisions have occurred following the abandonment of dual nomenclature and the adoption of molecular methods, which have clarified earlier misclassifications (Kidd et al. 2023). Consequently, even recent articles (as late as 2024) may report taxa using outdated classification. Taxonomic databases, including the NCBI database (NCBI 2025), are frequently updated. Between our first survey in 2023 and the present, 40–50 taxa have undergone reclassification, mainly at the species, genus and family levels and, in some cases, at the order and class levels.
The dominance of Ascomycota (Table 1) is consistent with other composting studies (Lin et al. 2018, Awasthi et al. 2023). However, the relatively high abundance of Mucoromycota, Basidiomycota and Chytridiomycota, which ranked second, third and fourth in taxonomic feature abundance, respectively, has not been reported elsewhere. Factors, such as raw material composition, mixture ratio, aeration, C/N balance, moisture, pH, shredding of garden trimmings and local environmental conditions, strongly affect the compost microbiome and may explain these differences. In metabolic terms, these fungal phyla play distinct roles during composting. Ascomycota and Mucoromycota contribute to the rapid degradation of simple carbohydrates and hemicellulose, Basidiomycota are particularly important lignin degraders through oxidative enzymes such as laccases and peroxidases and Chytridiomycota participate in the hydrolysis of cellulose and other recalcitrant polymers (Tuomela et al. 2000, Awasthi et al. 2023). Nevertheless, all phyla identified in this study have been reported previously in compost (Tuomela et al. 2000, Cai et al. 2018, Lin et al. 2018, He et al. 2022, Awasthi et al. 2023, Liu et al. 2024, Mahongnao et al. 2024, Ahmad et al. 2024).
Table 1.
List of phyla detected during the composting process, with corresponding classified reads aggregated at phylum level and relative abundances (RA) within the Eukarya domain, confirmed in the NCBI Taxonomy Browser.
| Phylum | Classified reads | RA |
| Ascomycota | 135741 | 60.80% |
| Basidiomycota | 18971 | 8.50% |
| Blastocladiomycota | 1068 | 0.48% |
| Chytridiomycota | 16096 | 7.21% |
| Cryptomycota | 6508 | 2.92% |
| Microsporidia | 2318 | 1.04% |
| Mucoromycota | 39638 | 17.76% |
| Olpidiomycota | 98 | 0.04% |
| Zoopagomycota | 2802 | 1.26% |
| Total | 223241 |
At the genus level, the most abundant taxa (relative abundance of classified reads > 1%) were Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Chaetomium, Aureobasidium, Madurella, Paramicrosporidium, Rhizophagus, Rasamsonia, Hyaloraphidium, Thermochaetoides, Talaromyces, Trichoderma and Podospora (Table 2). These genera can be broadly grouped according to their metabolic or ecological roles during composting: (i) decomposers and nutrient cyclers (Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Podospora, Thermochaetoides); (ii) biocontrol and cellulolytic fungi (Trichoderma, Chaetomium, Talaromyces, Rasamsonia); (iii) yeasts and opportunistic fungi (Aureobasidium, Madurella); (iv) microsporidia and chytrids associated with aquatic or anaerobic niches (Paramicrosporidium, Hyaloraphidium) and (v) mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus). Most of these genera have been previously reported in compost or during composting (Tuomela et al. 2000, Sebők et al. 2015, Anastasi et al. 2017, Cai et al. 2018, Lu et al. 2024, Mahongnao et al. 2024, Ahmad et al. 2024). Paramicrosporidium and Hyaloraphidium have been reported in non-aerated compost tea (Mengesha et al. 2017) and Paramicrosporidium was also detected in the gut of Hermetia illucens larvae grown in urban compost (Vallejo-Arróliga and Rojas-Jimenez 2024), suggesting that both genera may be associated with the composting environment.
Table 2.
List of classes, orders, families and genera detected during the composting process, with corresponding classified reads counts and relative abundances (RA) within the Eukarya domain, confirmed in the NCBI Taxonomy Browser.
| class | order | family | genus | Classified reads | RA |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Aaosphaeria | 48 | 0.02% | |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Cunninghamellaceae | Absidia | 269 | 0.12% |
| Exobasidiomycetes | Exobasidiales | Cryptobasidiaceae | Acaromyces | 17 | 0.01% |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Acaulosporaceae | Acaulospora | 96 | 0.04% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Teratosphaeriaceae | Acidomyces | 23 | 0.01% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Actinomortierella | 91 | 0.04% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Agaricaceae | Agaricus | 34 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Strophariaceae | Agrocybe | 48 | 0.02% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Pleosporaceae | Alternaria | 60 | 0.03% |
| Arthoniomycetes | Arthoniales | Lecanographaceae | Alyxoria | 29 | 0.01% |
| Glomeromycetes | Archaeosporales | Ambisporaceae | Ambispora | 1196 | 0.54% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Amniculicolaceae | Amniculicola | 59 | 0.03% |
| Amphiacanthidae | Amphiamblys | 17 | 0.01% | ||
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Amylocarpus | 38 | 0.02% | |
| Neocallimastigomycetes | Neocallimastigales | Neocallimastigaceae | Anaeromyces | 104 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Annulohypoxylon | 1963 | 0.88% |
| Dothideomycetes | Botryosphaeriales | Aplosporellaceae | Aplosporella | 62 | 0.03% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Apophysomyces | 1266 | 0.57% |
| Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Arthrobotrys | 389 | 0.17% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Arthrodermataceae | Arthroderma | 18 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Arthromyces | 18 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ascosphaeraceae | Ascosphaera | 31 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Aspergillaceae | Aspergillus | 40031 | 17.93% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Asterophora | 26 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Astraeaceae | Astraeus | 787 | 0.35% |
| Agaricomycetes | Atheliales | Atheliaceae | Athelia | 62 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Dothideales | Saccotheciaceae | Aureobasidium | 6896 | 3.09% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Lecanorales | Ramalinaceae | Bacidia | 19 | 0.01% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Backusellaceae | Backusella | 30 | 0.01% |
| Basidiobolomycetes | Basidiobolales | Basidiobolaceae | Basidiobolus | 220 | 0.10% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Batrachochytrium | 2052 | 0.92% | |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Cordycipitaceae | Beauveria | 627 | 0.28% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Benjaminiella | 20 | 0.01% |
| Endogonomycetes | Endogonales | Bifiguratus | 328 | 0.15% | |
| Blastocladiomycetes | Blastocladiales | Blastocladiaceae | Blastocladiella | 490 | 0.22% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ajellomycetaceae | Blastomyces | 276 | 0.12% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Blyttiomyces | 132 | 0.06% | ||
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Boletaceae | Boletus | 39 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Bondarzewiaceae | Bondarzewia | 171 | 0.08% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Terramycetaceae | Boothiomyces | 53 | 0.02% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophlyctidales | Borealophlyctidaceae | Borealophlyctis | 131 | 0.06% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Sclerotiniaceae | Botryotinia | 22 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Sclerotiniaceae | Botrytis | 230 | 0.10% |
| Pichiomycetes | Pichiales | Pichiaceae | Brettanomyces | 25 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Ploettnerulaceae | Cadophora | 51 | 0.02% |
| Dacrymycetes | Dacrymycetales | Dacrymycetaceae | Calocera | 415 | 0.19% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Calonectria | 203 | 0.09% |
| Candelariomycetes | Candelariales | Candelariaceae | Candelaria | 194 | 0.09% |
| Pichiomycetes | Serinales | Debaryomycetaceae | Candida | 794 | 0.36% |
| Agaricomycetes | Cantharellales | Hydnaceae | Cantharellus | 42 | 0.02% |
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Ancylistaceae | Capillidium | 110 | 0.05% |
| Blastocladiomycetes | Blastocladiales | Catenariaceae | Catenaria | 89 | 0.04% |
| Sordariomycetes | Microascales | Microascaceae | Cephalotrichum | 876 | 0.39% |
| Agaricomycetes | Cantharellales | Ceratobasidiaceae | Ceratobasidium | 997 | 0.45% |
| Sordariomycetes | Microascales | Ceratocystidaceae | Ceratocystis | 127 | 0.06% |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Gigasporaceae | Cetraspora | 863 | 0.39% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Chaetomium | 10780 | 4.83% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Choanephoraceae | Choanephora | 71 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Gomphidiaceae | Chroogomphus | 50 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Cryphonectriaceae | Chrysoporthe | 1935 | 0.87% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytridiaceae | Chytridium | 21 | 0.01% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytriomycetaceae | Chytriomyces | 1061 | 0.48% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Lichtheimiaceae | Circinella | 409 | 0.18% |
| Xylobotryomycetes | Xylobotryales | Cirrosporiaceae | Cirrosporium | 48 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Hypocreaceae | Cladobotryum | 184 | 0.08% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Cladochytriales | Cladochytriaceae | Cladochytrium | 408 | 0.18% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Herpotrichiellaceae | Cladophialophora | 103 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Clavicipitaceae | Claviceps | 43 | 0.02% |
| Pichiomycetes | Serinales | Metschnikowiaceae | Clavispora | 18 | 0.01% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Lindgomycetaceae | Clohesyomyces | 48 | 0.02% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Lobulomycetales | Lobulomycetaceae | Clydaea | 20 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Onygenaceae | Coccidioides | 200 | 0.09% |
| Blastocladiomycetes | Blastocladiales | Coelomomycetaceae | Coelomomyces | 137 | 0.06% |
| Kickxellomycetes | Kickxellales | Kickxellaceae | Coemansia | 322 | 0.14% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Dermateaceae | Coleophoma | 109 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Collariella | 114 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Glomerellales | Glomerellaceae | Colletotrichum | 1965 | 0.88% |
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Ancylistaceae | Conidiobolus | 107 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Coniochaetales | Coniochaetaceae | Coniochaeta | 169 | 0.08% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Coniothyriaceae | Coniothyrium | 623 | 0.28% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Psathyrellaceae | Coprinellus | 56 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Corynesporascaceae | Corynespora | 88 | 0.04% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Crepidotaceae | Crepidotus | 18 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Cryphonectriaceae | Cryphonectria | 196 | 0.09% |
| Tremellomycetes | Tremellales | Cryptococcaceae | Cryptococcus | 112 | 0.05% |
| Cucumispora | 341 | 0.15% | |||
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Tricladiaceae | Cudoniella | 6 | 0.00% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Cunninghamellaceae | Cunninghamella | 24 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Nidulariaceae | Cyathus | 64 | 0.03% |
| Dacrymycetes | Dacrymycetales | Dacrymycetaceae | Dacryopinax | 58 | 0.03% |
| Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Dactylella | 518 | 0.23% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Dactylonectria | 23 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Daldinia | 630 | 0.28% |
| Pichiomycetes | Serinales | Debaryomycetaceae | Debaryomyces | 303 | 0.14% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Dendrothele | 49 | 0.02% | |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Gigasporaceae | Dentiscutata | 85 | 0.04% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Diaporthaceae | Diaporthe | 78 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Polyporaceae | Dichomitus | 77 | 0.03% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Lichtheimiaceae | Dichotomocladium | 146 | 0.07% |
| Dictyocoela | 69 | 0.03% | |||
| Dimargaritomycetes | Dimargaritales | Dimargaritaceae | Dimargaris | 169 | 0.08% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytridiaceae | Dinochytrium | 76 | 0.03% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Drepanopezizaceae | Diplocarpon | 37 | 0.02% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Ostropales | Graphidaceae | Diploschistes | 128 | 0.06% |
| Kickxellomycetes | Kickxellales | Kickxellaceae | Dipsacomyces | 120 | 0.05% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Dissophora | 62 | 0.03% |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Diversisporaceae | Diversispora | 1695 | 0.76% |
| Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Drechslerella | 108 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Durotheca | 28 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Elaphomycetaceae | Elaphomyces | 304 | 0.14% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ajellomycetaceae | Emergomyces | 17 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Bionectriaceae | Emericellopsis | 144 | 0.06% |
| Endogonomycetes | Endogonales | Endogonaceae | Endogone | 418 | 0.19% |
| Enteropsectra | 55 | 0.02% | |||
| Enterocytozoonidae | Enterospora | 84 | 0.04% | ||
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Entomophthoraceae | Entomophthora | 30 | 0.01% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Entomortierella | 67 | 0.03% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytriomycetaceae | Entophlyctis | 23 | 0.01% |
| Glomeromycetes | Entrophosporales | Entrophosporaceae | Entrophospora | 322 | 0.14% |
| Dothideomycetes | Eremomycetales | Eremomycetaceae | Eremomyces | 152 | 0.07% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Saccharomycetaceae | Eremothecium | 13 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Erysiphales | Erysiphaceae | Erysiphe | 509 | 0.23% |
| Agaricomycetes | Auriculariales | Exidiaceae | Exidia | 47 | 0.02% |
| Exobasidiomycetes | Exobasidiales | Exobasidiaceae | Exobasidium | 15 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Herpotrichiellaceae | Exophiala | 61 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Pleosporaceae | Exserohilum | 873 | 0.39% |
| Tremellomycetes | Filobasidiales | Filobasidiaceae | Filobasidium | 256 | 0.11% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Spizellomycetales | Powellomycetaceae | Fimicolochytrium | 42 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Tricholomataceae | Flagelloscypha | 18 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Hymenochaetales | Hymenochaetaceae | Fomitiporia | 314 | 0.14% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Fomitopsidaceae | Fomitopsis | 62 | 0.03% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Herpotrichiellaceae | Fonsecaea | 65 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Teratosphaeriaceae | Friedmanniomyces | 595 | 0.27% |
| Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | Glomeraceae | Funneliformis | 1048 | 0.47% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Fusarium | 599 | 0.27% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Spizellomycetales | Spizellomycetaceae | Gaertneriomyces | 90 | 0.04% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Gamsiella | 63 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Polyporaceae | Ganoderma | 37 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Sordariaceae | Gelasinospora | 68 | 0.03% |
| Geoglossomycetes | Geoglossales | Geoglossaceae | Geoglossum | 469 | 0.21% |
| Glomeromycetes | Archaeosporales | Geosiphonaceae | Geosiphon | 80 | 0.04% |
| Dipodascomycetes | Dipodascales | Dipodascaceae | Geotrichum | 373 | 0.17% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Spizellomycetales | Powellomycetaceae | Geranomyces | 126 | 0.06% |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Gigasporaceae | Gigaspora | 1068 | 0.48% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Globomycetaceae | Globomyces | 276 | 0.12% |
| Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | Glomeraceae | Glomus | 40 | 0.02% |
| Geoglossomycetes | Geoglossales | Geoglossaceae | Glutinoglossum | 359 | 0.16% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Gnomoniaceae | Gnomoniopsis | 19 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Erysiphales | Erysiphaceae | Golovinomyces | 297 | 0.13% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Ostropales | Graphidaceae | Gomphillus | 297 | 0.13% |
| Monoblepharidomycetes | Monoblepharidales | Gonapodyaceae | Gonapodya | 597 | 0.27% |
| Dothideomycetes | Acrospermales | Acrospermaceae | Gonatophragmium | 87 | 0.04% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Cunninghamellaceae | Gongronella | 197 | 0.09% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Gorgonomycetaceae | Gorgonomyces | 1147 | 0.51% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Gryganskiella | 40 | 0.02% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Teloschistales | Teloschistaceae | Gyalolechia | 20 | 0.01% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Cunninghamellaceae | Halteromyces | 24 | 0.01% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycodales | Saccharomycodaceae | Hanseniaspora | 44 | 0.02% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Haplosporangium | 59 | 0.03% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Bionectriaceae | Hapsidospora | 16 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Hymenogastraceae | Hebeloma | 330 | 0.15% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ajellomycetaceae | Helicocarpus | 111 | 0.05% |
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Hericiaceae | Hericium | 218 | 0.10% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Meruliaceae | Hermanssonia | 76 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Bondarzewiaceae | Heterobasidion | 35 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Ophiocordycipitaceae | Hirsutella | 50 | 0.02% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ajellomycetaceae | Histoplasma | 1379 | 0.62% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Teratosphaeriaceae | Hortaea | 213 | 0.10% |
| Monoblepharidomycetes | Monoblepharidales | Hyaloraphidium | 3105 | 1.39% | |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Hyaloscyphaceae | Hyaloscypha | 33 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Hygrophoropsidaceae | Hygrophoropsis | 30 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Hypomontagnella | 12 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Hypocreaceae | Hypomyces | 61 | 0.03% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Hypoxylon | 196 | 0.09% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Hypsizygus | 114 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Ilyonectria | 270 | 0.12% |
| Agaricomycetes | Hymenochaetales | Hymenochaetaceae | Inonotus | 39 | 0.02% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytridiaceae | Irineochytrium | 257 | 0.12% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Irpicaceae | Irpex | 89 | 0.04% |
| Agaricomycetes | Jaapiales | Jaapiaceae | Jaapia | 65 | 0.03% |
| Endogonomycetes | Endogonales | Endogonaceae | Jimgerdemannia | 61 | 0.03% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Juglanconidaceae | Juglanconis | 1238 | 0.55% |
| Sordariomycetes | Microascales | Microascaceae | Kernia | 297 | 0.13% |
| Tremellomycetes | Tremellales | Cryptococcaceae | Kwoniella | 267 | 0.12% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Hydnangiaceae | Laccaria | 54 | 0.02% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Saccharomycetaceae | Lachancea | 496 | 0.22% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Laetiporaceae | Laetiporus | 47 | 0.02% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Umbilicariales | Umbilicariaceae | Lasallia | 24 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Omphalotaceae | Lentinula | 57 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Polyporaceae | Lentinus | 77 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Lentitheciaceae | Lentithecium | 82 | 0.04% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mytilinidiales | Argynnaceae | Lepidopterella | 70 | 0.03% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Leptodontidiaceae | Leptodontidium | 1666 | 0.75% |
| Sordariomycetes | Ophiostomatales | Ophiostomataceae | Leptographium | 52 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Leucogyrophana | 188 | 0.08% | |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Lichtheimiaceae | Lichtheimia | 561 | 0.25% |
| Kickxellomycetes | Kickxellales | Kickxellaceae | Linderina | 42 | 0.02% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Linnemannia | 1196 | 0.54% |
| Lipomycetes | Lipomycetales | Lipomycetaceae | Lipomyces | 9 | 0.00% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Lobosporangium | 21 | 0.01% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Lobulomycetales | Lobulomycetaceae | Lobulomyces | 19 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Microascales | Microascaceae | Lomentospora | 38 | 0.02% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Lophiotremataceae | Lophiotrema | 28 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Lyophyllum | 60 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Botryosphaeriales | Botryosphaeriaceae | Macrophomina | 1885 | 0.84% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Madurella | 6366 | 2.85% | |
| Dipodascomycetes | Dipodascales | Dipodascaceae | Magnusiomyces | 92 | 0.04% |
| Malasseziomycetes | Malasseziales | Malasseziaceae | Malassezia | 236 | 0.11% |
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Entomophthoraceae | Massospora | 25 | 0.01% |
| Exobasidiomycetes | Exobasidiales | Brachybasidiaceae | Meira | 434 | 0.19% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Clavicipitaceae | Metarhizium | 340 | 0.15% |
| Pichiomycetes | Serinales | Metschnikowiaceae | Metschnikowia | 40 | 0.02% |
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Ancylistaceae | Microconidiobolus | 198 | 0.09% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Microdochiaceae | Microdochium | 31 | 0.01% |
| Mitosporidium | 933 | 0.42% | |||
| Mixiomycetes | Mixiales | Mixiaceae | Mixia | 11 | 0.00% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Clavicipitaceae | Moelleriella | 104 | 0.05% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Mollisiaceae | Mollisia | 19 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Aspergillaceae | Monascus | 147 | 0.07% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Sclerotiniaceae | Monilinia | 771 | 0.35% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Marasmiaceae | Moniliophthora | 71 | 0.03% |
| Monoblepharidomycetes | Monoblepharidales | Monoblepharidaceae | Monoblepharella | 512 | 0.23% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Monosporascus | 144 | 0.06% | |
| Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Morchellaceae | Morchella | 1020 | 0.46% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | 855 | 0.38% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Mucor | 1315 | 0.59% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Mycenaceae | Mycena | 797 | 0.36% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Mycothermus | 12 | 0.01% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mycotyphaceae | Mycotypha | 63 | 0.03% |
| Tremellomycetes | Filobasidiales | Filobasidiaceae | Naganishia | 22 | 0.01% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Saccharomycetaceae | Nakaseomyces | 59 | 0.03% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Arthrodermataceae | Nannizzia | 30 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Nemania | 71 | 0.03% |
| Nematocida | 225 | 0.10% | |||
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Apiosporaceae | Neoarthrinium | 100 | 0.04% |
| Neocallimastigomycetes | Neocallimastigales | Neocallimastigaceae | Neocallimastix | 50 | 0.02% |
| Entomophthoromycetes | Entomophthorales | Ancylistaceae | Neoconidiobolus | 14 | 0.01% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Teratosphaeriaceae | Neohortaea | 48 | 0.02% |
| Neolectomycetes | Neolectales | Neolectaceae | Neolecta | 41 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Sporocadaceae | Neopestalotiopsis | 106 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Sordariaceae | Neurospora | 619 | 0.28% |
| Nosematidae | Nosema | 382 | 0.17% | ||
| Chytridiomycetes | Cladochytriales | Nowakowskiellaceae | Nowakowskiella | 175 | 0.08% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytriomycetaceae | Obelidium | 20 | 0.01% |
| Pichiomycetes | Pichiales | Pichiaceae | Ogataea | 13 | 0.01% |
| Olpidiomycetes | Olpidiales | Olpidiaceae | Olpidium | 98 | 0.04% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Ophiocordycipitaceae | Ophiocordyceps | 858 | 0.38% |
| Sordariomycetes | Diaporthales | Gnomoniaceae | Ophiognomonia | 456 | 0.20% |
| Sordariomycetes | Ophiostomatales | Ophiostomataceae | Ophiostoma | 799 | 0.36% |
| Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Orbilia | 1955 | 0.88% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Thermoascaceae | Paecilomyces | 1119 | 0.50% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Galeropsidaceae | Panaeolus | 197 | 0.09% |
| Pancytospora | 92 | 0.04% | |||
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Panaceae | Panus | 17 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Ajellomycetaceae | Paracoccidioides | 392 | 0.18% |
| Glomeromycetes | Paraglomerales | Paraglomeraceae | Paraglomus | 360 | 0.16% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Ophiocordycipitaceae | Paraisaria | 40 | 0.02% |
| Paramicrosporidium | 6046 | 2.71% | |||
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Stachybotryaceae | Paramyrothecium | 16 | 0.01% |
| Physodermatomycetes | Physodermatales | Physodermataceae | Paraphysoderma | 353 | 0.16% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Parasitella | 602 | 0.27% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Paxillaceae | Paxillus | 56 | 0.02% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Peltigerales | Peltigeraceae | Peltigera | 188 | 0.08% |
| Lichinomycetes | Lichinales | Phylliscaceae | Peltula | 78 | 0.04% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Aspergillaceae | Penicilliopsis | 539 | 0.24% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Aspergillaceae | Penicillium | 1845 | 0.83% |
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Peniophoraceae | Peniophora | 312 | 0.14% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Sporocadaceae | Pestalotiopsis | 191 | 0.09% |
| Tremellomycetes | Cystofilobasidiales | Mrakiaceae | Phaffia | 16 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Phanerochaetaceae | Phanerochaete | 207 | 0.09% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Lichtheimiaceae | Phascolomyces | 14 | 0.01% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | Herpotrichiellaceae | Phialophora | 19 | 0.01% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytridiaceae | Phlyctochytrium | 822 | 0.37% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Strophariaceae | Pholiota | 53 | 0.02% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Phycomycetaceae | Phycomyces | 96 | 0.04% |
| Lichinomycetes | Lichinales | Phylliscaceae | Phylliscum | 38 | 0.02% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Caliciales | Physciaceae | Physcia | 30 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Meripilaceae | Physisporinus | 243 | 0.11% |
| Pichiomycetes | Pichiales | Pichiaceae | Pichia | 111 | 0.05% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Pilaira | 29 | 0.01% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Pilobolaceae | Pilobolus | 61 | 0.03% |
| Zoopagomycetes | Zoopagales | Piptocephalidaceae | Piptocephalis | 65 | 0.03% |
| Neocallimastigomycetes | Neocallimastigales | Neocallimastigaceae | Piromyces | 619 | 0.28% |
| Sordariomycetes | Glomerellales | Plectosphaerellaceae | Plectosphaerella | 1257 | 0.56% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Leptosphaeriaceae | Plenodomus | 25 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Pleurotaceae | Pleurotus | 18 | 0.01% |
| Pneumocystomycetes | Pneumocystales | Pneumocystaceae | Pneumocystis | 72 | 0.03% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Clavicipitaceae | Pochonia | 106 | 0.05% |
| Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Podila | 73 | 0.03% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytriomycetaceae | Podochytrium | 12 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Erysiphales | Erysiphaceae | Podosphaera | 161 | 0.07% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Podosporaceae | Podospora | 2356 | 1.06% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Polychytriales | Polychytrium | 248 | 0.11% | |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Tetraplosphaeriaceae | Polyplosphaeria | 47 | 0.02% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Polyrhizophydium | 73 | 0.03% | |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Polytolypa | 74 | 0.03% | |
| Chytridiomycetes | Spizellomycetales | Powellomycetaceae | Powellomyces | 264 | 0.12% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Mycosphaerellaceae | Pseudocercospora | 14 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Thelebolales | Thelebolaceae | Pseudogymnoascus | 819 | 0.37% |
| Pseudoloma | 48 | 0.02% | |||
| Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | Ustilaginaceae | Pseudozyma | 24 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Strophariaceae | Psilocybe | 561 | 0.25% |
| Pucciniomycetes | Pucciniales | Pucciniaceae | Puccinia | 483 | 0.22% |
| Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Pyronemataceae | Pyronema | 306 | 0.14% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Quaeritorhizaceae | Quaeritorhiza | 1731 | 0.78% | |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Gigasporaceae | Racocetra | 299 | 0.13% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Radiomycetaceae | Radiomyces | 61 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Gomphales | Gomphaceae | Ramaria | 103 | 0.05% |
| Ramicandelaberales | Ramicandelaberaceae | Ramicandelaber | 34 | 0.02% | |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Mycosphaerellaceae | Ramularia | 62 | 0.03% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Trichocomaceae | Rasamsonia | 4036 | 1.81% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | Chytriomycetaceae | Rhizoclosmatium | 962 | 0.43% |
| Agaricomycetes | Cantharellales | Ceratobasidiaceae | Rhizoctonia | 758 | 0.34% |
| Dothideomycetes | Aulographales | Rhizodiscinaceae | Rhizodiscina | 15 | 0.01% |
| Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | Glomeraceae | Rhizophagus | 4204 | 1.88% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophlyctidales | Rhizophlyctidaceae | Rhizophlyctis | 462 | 0.21% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Rhizopogonaceae | Rhizopogon | 47 | 0.02% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Rhizopodaceae | Rhizopus | 19211 | 8.61% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Omphalotaceae | Rhodocollybia | 33 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Fomitopsidaceae | Rhodofomes | 117 | 0.05% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Adustoporiaceae | Rhodonia | 493 | 0.22% |
| Microbotryomycetes | Sporidiobolales | Sporidiobolaceae | Rhodotorula | 107 | 0.05% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Rosellinia | 154 | 0.07% |
| Rozella | 462 | 0.21% | |||
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Russulaceae | Russula | 942 | 0.42% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Rutstroemiaceae | Rutstroemia | 38 | 0.02% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Saccharomycetaceae | Saccharomyces | 542 | 0.24% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycodales | Saccharomycodaceae | Saccharomycodes | 31 | 0.01% |
| Saitoella | 284 | 0.13% | |||
| Tremellomycetes | Tremellales | Trimorphomycetaceae | Saitozyma | 792 | 0.35% |
| Agaricomycetes | Hymenochaetales | Hymenochaetaceae | Sanghuangporus | 202 | 0.09% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Schizophyllaceae | Schizophyllum | 100 | 0.04% |
| Agaricomycetes | Hymenochaetales | Schizoporaceae | Schizopora | 42 | 0.02% |
| Schizosaccharomycetes | Schizosaccharomycetales | Schizosaccharomycetaceae | Schizosaccharomyces | 22 | 0.01% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Sclerodermataceae | Scleroderma | 28 | 0.01% |
| Coniocybomycetes | Coniocybales | Coniocybaceae | Sclerophora | 198 | 0.09% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Sclerotiniaceae | Sclerotinia | 281 | 0.13% |
| Sordariomycetes | Microascales | Microascaceae | Scopulariopsis | 1907 | 0.85% |
| Glomeromycetes | Diversisporales | Gigasporaceae | Scutellospora | 21 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Scytalidium | 740 | 0.33% | ||
| Agaricomycetes | Sebacinales | Serendipitaceae | Serendipita | 345 | 0.15% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Serpulaceae | Serpula | 23 | 0.01% |
| Harpellomycetes | Harpellales | Legeriomycetaceae | Smittium | 423 | 0.19% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Sordariaceae | Sordaria | 752 | 0.34% |
| Agaricomycetes | Geastrales | Sphaerobolaceae | Sphaerobolus | 88 | 0.04% |
| Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Pyronemataceae | Sphaerosporella | 13 | 0.01% |
| Kickxellomycetes | Kickxellales | Kickxellaceae | Spiromyces | 77 | 0.03% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Spizellomycetales | Spizellomycetaceae | Spizellomyces | 123 | 0.06% |
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Massarinaceae | Stagonospora | 24 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Staphylotrichum | 350 | 0.16% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Strophariaceae | Stropharia | 181 | 0.08% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Suillaceae | Suillus | 313 | 0.14% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Syncephalastraceae | Syncephalastrum | 51 | 0.02% |
| Zoopagomycetes | Zoopagales | Piptocephalidaceae | Syncephalis | 781 | 0.35% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Synchytriales | Synchytriaceae | Synchytrium | 187 | 0.08% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Trichocomaceae | Talaromyces | 2651 | 1.19% |
| Taphrinomycetes | Taphrinales | Taphrinaceae | Taphrina | 30 | 0.01% |
| Dothideomycetes | Mycosphaerellales | Teratosphaeriaceae | Teratosphaeria | 2041 | 0.91% |
| Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Pezizaceae | Terfezia | 47 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Termitomyces | 1006 | 0.45% |
| Chytridiomycetes | Rhizophydiales | Terramycetaceae | Terramyces | 37 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Marasmiaceae | Tetrapyrgos | 183 | 0.08% |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Mucoraceae | Thamnidium | 125 | 0.06% |
| Lecanoromycetes | Thelocarpales | Thelocarpaceae | Thelocarpon | 22 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Thermochaetoides | 2930 | 1.31% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Eurotiales | Trichocomaceae | Thermomyces | 172 | 0.08% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Thermothelomyces | 1758 | 0.79% |
| Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | Thermothielavioides | 1116 | 0.50% |
| Sordariomycetes | Chaetosphaeriales | Chaetosphaeriaceae | Thozetella | 28 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Thyridiaceae | Thyridium | 317 | 0.14% | |
| Exobasidiomycetes | Tilletiales | Tilletiaceae | Tilletia | 100 | 0.04% |
| Exobasidiomycetes | Entylomatales | Tilletiopsis | 14 | 0.01% | |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Ophiocordycipitaceae | Tolypocladium | 23 | 0.01% |
| Saccharomycetes | Saccharomycetales | Saccharomycetaceae | Torulaspora | 69 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Venturiales | Cylindrosympodiaceae | Tothia | 477 | 0.21% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Polyporaceae | Trametes | 723 | 0.32% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Irpicaceae | Trametopsis | 16 | 0.01% |
| Tremellomycetes | Tremellales | Tremellaceae | Tremella | 70 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Phaeotrichales | Phaeotrichaceae | Trichodelitschia | 28 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Hypocreaceae | Trichoderma | 2559 | 1.15% |
| Geoglossomycetes | Geoglossales | Geoglossaceae | Trichoglossum | 49 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Lyophyllaceae | Tricholomella | 37 | 0.02% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Arthrodermataceae | Trichophyton | 149 | 0.07% |
| Tremellomycetes | Trichosporonales | Trichosporonaceae | Trichosporon | 33 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Helotiaceae | Tricladium | 24 | 0.01% |
| Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Tuberaceae | Tuber | 764 | 0.34% |
| Tubulinosematidae | Tubulinosema | 15 | 0.01% | ||
| Agaricomycetes | Cantharellales | Tulasnellaceae | Tulasnella | 303 | 0.14% |
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Psathyrellaceae | Tulosesus | 73 | 0.03% |
| Agaricomycetes | Boletales | Boletaceae | Tylopilus | 446 | 0.20% |
| Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | Umbelopsidaceae | Umbelopsis | 234 | 0.10% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Onygenales | Onygenaceae | Uncinocarpus | 15 | 0.01% |
| Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | Ustilaginaceae | Ustilago | 434 | 0.19% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Ustulina | 74 | 0.03% |
| Nosematidae | Vairimorpha | 27 | 0.01% | ||
| Tremellomycetes | Trichosporonales | Trichosporonaceae | Vanrija | 53 | 0.02% |
| Agaricomycetes | Russulales | Lachnocladiaceae | Vararia | 11 | 0.00% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Discinellaceae | Varicosporium | 31 | 0.01% |
| Dothideomycetes | Venturiales | Venturiaceae | Venturia | 59 | 0.03% |
| Leotiomycetes | Helotiales | Pleuroascaceae | Venustampulla | 126 | 0.06% |
| Dothideomycetes | Venturiales | Sympoventuriaceae | Verruconis | 20 | 0.01% |
| Sordariomycetes | Glomerellales | Plectosphaerellaceae | Verticillium | 231 | 0.10% |
| Nosematidae | Vittaforma | 30 | 0.01% | ||
| Agaricomycetes | Agaricales | Pluteaceae | Volvariella | 17 | 0.01% |
| Wallemiomycetes | Wallemiales | Wallemiaceae | Wallemia | 1304 | 0.58% |
| Lichinomycetes | Lichinales | Porocyphaceae | Watsoniomyces | 33 | 0.01% |
| Dipodascomycetes | Dipodascales | Trichomonascaceae | Wickerhamiella | 83 | 0.04% |
| Saccharomycetes | Phaffomycetales | Wickerhamomycetaceae | Wickerhamomyces | 181 | 0.08% |
| Agaricomycetes | Polyporales | Phaeolaceae | Wolfiporia | 44 | 0.02% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Xylaria | 591 | 0.26% |
| Sordariomycetes | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Xylariaceae | 31 | 0.01% |
| Leotiomycetes | Xylogone | 108 | 0.05% | ||
| Pichiomycetes | Serinales | Debaryomycetaceae | Yamadazyma | 22 | 0.01% |
| Harpellomycetes | Harpellales | Legeriomycetaceae | Zancudomyces | 65 | 0.03% |
| Dothideomycetes | Zopfiaceae | Zopfia | 117 | 0.05% | |
| Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Lichtheimiaceae | Zychaea | 48 | 0.02% |
| Eurotiomycetes | Chaetothyriales | 69 | 0.03% | ||
| Chytridiomycetes | Chytridiales | 62 | 0.03% |
Amongst the 13 most abundant genera, Rhizophagus (an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus - AMF) is the only one without published reports linking it directly to composting. However, its presence in soil is well documented and studies have shown that compost addition stimulates hyphal growth and sporulation, benefiting multiple crops (Yang et al. 2018, Boutasknit et al. 2020, Tahiri et al. 2022). Rhizophagus, an obligate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), requires a living plant host for active growth (Smith and Read 2008). These fungi produce resistant spores capable of persisting in soil and plant residues and may be introduced into compost through yard trimmings or soil particles (Aguilar-Paredes et al. 2023). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing detects environmental DNA (eDNA) irrespective of metabolic state. Nevertheless, the observed relative abundance of 1.88% (within Fungi) suggests that additional factors may be involved beyond the mechanisms currently identified. The potential survival of AMF propagules during composting may have implications for the agricultural use of the final product.
Amongst the detected taxa (Monjardino et al. 2025), some correspond to host-specific or host-obligate parasites, including human-associated Pneumocystis jirovecii (Cissé et al. 2020), insect-associated Entomophthora muscae and Massospora cicadina (Elya and De Fine Licht 2021), amphibian-associated Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Martel et al. 2013) and amoeba-associated Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae (Quandt et al. 2017). Shotgun metagenomics identifies DNA fragments based on sequence similarity and does not discriminate amongst active organisms, dormant propagules or residual environmental DNA. Their detection may, therefore, reflect resistant spores, residual host material introduced through garden trimmings, undetected microscopic hosts or taxonomic assignments to closely-related environmental lineages. However, for relatively abundant taxa, such as Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (RA = 0.59%) and Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae (RA = 2.71%) and, given that their known host species were not identified, additional factors may account for their presence in the composting material. These findings highlight the complexity of compost-associated microbial diversity and warrant further ecological investigation.
Although composting typically requires no inoculation, several studies demonstrated positive effects of fungal amendments, despite fungi often being amongst the least abundant microbial groups (He et al. 2022). Different taxa have been inoculated for: (i) detoxification of inhibitory compounds, for example, supplementation with Paecilomyces sp. FA13 enhances the degradation of furan derivatives during food waste pretreatment (Nakasaki et al. 2015); (ii) lignocellulose degradation and humification, with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatum increasing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin breakdown, while elevating humus and humic acid content, all of which were also detected in our samples (Table 2); and (iii) synergistic effects with other microbes, such as inoculation with thermotolerant actinomycetes, which accelerates humification and increases humic substance content by 50–100% (Zhao et al. 2017).
Most of the fungi listed in Table 2 are relevant to composting. Based on previous studies and their relative abundances (> 0.5% of classified reads), three main functional groups emerge with the greatest potential for agricultural applications: (i) biocontrol fungi (Trichoderma, Chaetomium, Aureobasidium, Penicillium, Paecilomyces); (ii) mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus, Diversispora, Ambispora) and (iii) nutrient cyclers and decomposers (Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Mucor, Podospora, Thermothelomyces, Linnemannia). The remaining genera detected were either pathogenic or of limited agricultural value.
In summary, this study provides a shotgun metagenomic inventory of fungal taxa detected across composting stages, documenting their relative read abundance and reinforcing the ecological and agricultural relevance of fungal communities within compost systems.
Acknowledgements
The research was funded by VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307, financed by FEDER and Teramb – Empresa Municipal de Gestão e Valorização Ambiental da Ilha Terceira, EM. Additionally, the Biotechnology Centre of Azores financed the Open Access for this publication (FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05292/2025 DOI https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05292/2025 and from the Azorean Regional Directorate of Science, Innovation and Development, through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System, Ref. M1.1 A/FUNC.UI&D/016/2025). PAVB was funded by FCT through national and European funds by UID/00329/2023 - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C) and Regional Directorate for Science, Innovation and Development [Regional Government of the Azores] through the PROSCIENTIA Incentive System (M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/021/2025 [UI&D/GBA/2025]). The data here published will be also put available in AZORES BIOPORTAL under the supervion of PAVB.
The authors also wish to express their gratitude to Teramb for providing the field equipment to carry out part of this work and to Cátia Pereira for supervising the compost production site during this experiment.
Funding Statement
The research was funded by VERCOCHAR - Vermicompost, compost y biochar, herramientas para la adaptación al cambio climático, la prevención y mitigación de los efectos derivados de los riesgos naturales en el medio agrícola y forestal, MAC2/3.5b/307
Author contributions
P.M.: Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition, project administration, Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, writing —original draft; A.R.A.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing — review and editing; D.M.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing — review and editing; G.P.: Data curation, Writing — review and editing; P.A.V.B.: Methodology, Writing — review and editing; J.F.: Data curation, Writing — review and editing; D.T.: Conceptualisation, Methodology; Investigation, Data curation, Validation, Writing — review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- Aguilar-Paredes Ana, Valdés Gabriela, Araneda Nicole, Valdebenito Emky, Hansen Felipe, Nuti Marco. Microbial community in the composting process and its positive impact on the soil biota in sustainable agriculture. Agronomy. 2023;13(2) doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad A., Haq T., Karim A., Saleem M., Hasan K. A., Liaqat I., Zafar U. Designing of phosphate rich compost inoculated with environmental strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAC1 as a phosphate solubilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2024;22(11):10029–10048. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-06278-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Anastasi Antonella, Varese Giovanna Cristina, Filipello Marchisio Valeria. Isolation and identification of fungal communities in compost and vermicompost. Mycologia. 2017;97(1):33–44. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Awasthi Sanjeev Kumar, Verma Shivpal, Liu Tao, Awasthi Mukesh Kumar, Zhang Zengqiang, Syed Asad, Bahkali Ali H. Regulation of fungal communities during pig manure composting. Bioresource Technology. 2023;389 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boutasknit Abderrahim, Ait-Rahou Youssef, Anli Mohamed, Ait-El-Mokhtar Mohamed, Ben-Laouane Raja, Meddich Abdelilah. Improvement of garlic growth, physiology, biochemical traits, and soil fertility by Rhizophagus irregularis and compost. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2020;73(2):149–160. doi: 10.1007/s10343-020-00533-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cai Linlin, Gong Xiaoqiang, Sun Xiangyang, Li Suyan, Yu Xin. Comparison of chemical and microbiological changes during the aerobic composting and vermicomposting of green waste. PLOS One. 2018;13(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cissé Ousmane H., Ma Liang, Jiang Chao, Snyder Michael, Kovacs Joseph A. Humans are selectively exposed to Pneumocystis jirovecii. mBio. 2020;11(2) doi: 10.1128/mbio.03138-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elya Carolyn, De Fine Licht Henrik H. The genus Entomophthora: bringing the insect destroyers into the twenty-first century. IMA Fungus. 2021;12(1) doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00084-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Jing, Zhu Nengmin, Xu Yansheng, Wang Li, Zheng Jiaqiang, Li Xia. The microbial mechanisms of enhanced humification by inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma longibrachiatum during biogas residues composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022;351 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang Son A., Bolan Nanthi, Madhubashani A. M.P., Vithanage Meththika, Perera Vishma, Wijesekara Hasintha, Wang Hailong, Srivastava Prashant, Kirkham M. B., Mickan Bede S., Rinklebe Jörg, Siddique Kadambot H. M. Treatment processes to eliminate potential environmental hazards and restore agronomic value of sewage sludge: A review. Environmental Pollution. 2022;293 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kidd Sarah E, Abdolrasouli Alireza, Hagen Ferry. Fungal nomenclature: Managing change is the name of the game. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2023;10(1) doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin Long, Xu Fuqing, Ge Xumeng, Li Yebo. Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;89:151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Xin, Rong Xiangmin, Jiang Pan, Yang Junyan, Li Han, Yang Yong, Deng Xingxiang, Xie Guixian, Luo Gongwen. Biodiversity and core microbiota of key-stone ecological clusters regulate compost maturity during cow-dung-driven composting. Environmental Research. 2024;245 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Mengling, Hao Yuhao, Lin Binfeng, Huang Zhi, Zhang Yu, Chen Liang, Li Kai, Li Jianbin. The bioaugmentation effect of microbial inoculants on humic acid formation during co-composting of bagasse and cow manure. Environmental Research. 2024;252 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahongnao Sophayo, Sharma Pooja, Nanda Sarita. Characterization of fungal microbiome structure in leaf litter compost through metagenomic profiling for harnessing the bio-organic fertilizer potential. 3 Biotech. 2024;14(9) doi: 10.1007/s13205-024-04028-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martel An, Spitzen-van der Sluijs Annemarieke, Blooi Mark, Bert Wim, Ducatelle Richard, Fisher Matthew C., Woeltjes Antonius, Bosman Wilbert, Chiers Koen, Bossuyt Franky, Pasmans Frank. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans sp. nov. causes lethal chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(38):15325–15329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307356110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martins Layla Farage, Antunes Luciana Principal, Pascon Renata C., de Oliveira Julio Cezar Franco, Digiampietri Luciano A., Barbosa Deibs, Peixoto Bruno Malveira, Vallim Marcelo A., Viana-Niero Cristina, Ostroski Eric H., Telles Guilherme P., Dias Zanoni, da Cruz João Batista, Juliano Luiz, Verjovski-Almeida Sergio, da Silva Aline Maria, Setubal João Carlos. Correction: Metagenomic analysis of a tropical composting operation at the São Paulo Zoo Park reveals diversity of biomass degradation functions and organisms. PLOS One. 2013;8(6) doi: 10.1371/annotation/2cca811e-d45b-4854-a420-d0405309ef43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mello Bruno L., Alessi Anna M., Riaño-Pachón Diego M., deAzevedo Eduardo R., Guimarães Francisco E. G., Espirito Santo Melissa C., McQueen-Mason Simon, Bruce Neil C., Polikarpov Igor. Targeted metatranscriptomics of compost-derived consortia reveals a GH11 exerting an unusual exo-1,4-β-xylanase activity. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2017;10(1) doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0944-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mengesha W. K., Gill W. M., Powell S. M., Evans K. J., Barry K. M. A study of selected factors affecting efficacy of compost tea against several fungal pathogens of potato. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2017;123(3):732–747. doi: 10.1111/jam.13530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monjardino P., R. Azevedo; A., Mendonça D., Pozsgai G., Borges P. A. V., Frias J., Toubarro D. GBIF; 2026. [2026-02-27T00:53:10+00:00]. Metagenomic survey of compost fungi from Terceira (Azores Archipelago) 1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nakasaki Kiyohiko, Mimoto Hiroshi, Tran Quyen Ngoc Minh, Oinuma Akiko. Composting of food waste subjected to hydrothermal pretreatment and inoculated with Paecilomyces sp. FA13. Bioresource Technology. 2015;180:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NCBI NCBI Taxonomy Browser. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi. [2025-08-18T00:53:10+00:00]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi
- NOVOGENE Shotgun metagenomic sequencing. https://www.novogene.com/us-en/services/research-services/metagenome-sequencing/shotgun-metagenomic-sequencing/#overview. [2025-03-28T00:24:57+00:00]. https://www.novogene.com/us-en/services/research-services/metagenome-sequencing/shotgun-metagenomic-sequencing/#overview
- Quandt C Alisha, Beaudet Denis, Corsaro Daniele, Walochnik Julia, Michel Rolf, Corradi Nicolas, James Timothy Y. The genome of an intranuclear parasite, Paramicrosporidium saccamoebae, reveals alternative adaptations to obligate intracellular parasitism. eLife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/elife.29594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quince Christopher, Walker Alan W, Simpson Jared T, Loman Nicholas J, Segata Nicola. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35(9):833–844. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sebők Flóra, Dobolyi Csaba, Bobvos János, Szoboszlay Sándor, Kriszt Balázs, Magyar Donát. Thermophilic fungi in air samples in surroundings of compost piles of municipal, agricultural and horticultural origin. Aerobiologia. 2015;32(2):255–263. doi: 10.1007/s10453-015-9396-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. E., Read D. J. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd Edition. Academic Press; Cambridge: 2008. 787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tahiri Abdel-ilah, Raklami Anas, Bechtaoui Noura, Anli Mohamed, Boutasknit Abderrahim, Oufdou Khalid, Meddich Abdelilah. Beneficial effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growth under field conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2022;74(1):219–235. doi: 10.1007/s10343-021-00604-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tarpani Raphael Ricardo Zepon, Alfonsín Carolina, Hospido Almudena, Azapagic Adisa. Life cycle environmental impacts of sewage sludge treatment methods for resource recovery considering ecotoxicity of heavy metals and pharmaceutical and personal care products. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;260 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuomela M, Vikman M, Hatakka A, Itävaara M. Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: a review. Bioresource Technology. 2000;72(2):169–183. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00104-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vallejo-Arróliga Mónica, Rojas-Jimenez Keilor. Yeasts of Pichia (Pichiaceae) dominate the mycobiome of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae during urban composting. Revista de Biología Tropical. 2024;72(1) doi: 10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.57898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Varma Vempalli Sudharsan, Das Suminakshi, Sastri Chivukula V., Kalamdhad Ajay S. Microbial degradation of lignocellulosic fractions during drum composting of mixed organic waste. Sustainable Environment Research. 2017;27(6):265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.serj.2017.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Hongye, Shankar Vijay, Jiang Xiuping. Compositional and functional changes in microbial communities of composts due to the composting-related factors and the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022;10(4) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01845-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Wei, Gu Siyu, Xin Ying, Bello Ayodeji, Sun Wenpeng, Xu Xiuhong. Compost addition eHyphal growth and sporulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi without affecting their composition in the soil. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Shilin, Deng Shuanghui, Zhou Ao, Wang Xuebin, Tan Houzhang. Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emission for sewage sludge treatment and disposal: a review. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1123972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Zhongtang, Morrison Mark. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. BioTechniques. 2018;36(5):808–812. doi: 10.2144/04365st04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Yi, Zhao Yue, Zhang Zhechao, Wei Yuquan, Wang Huan, Lu Qian, Li Yanjie, Wei Zimin. Effect of thermo-tolerant actinomycetes inoculation on cellulose degradation and the formation of humic substances during composting. Waste Management. 2017;68:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Research Zymo. Quick DNA Miniprep Plus Kit. http://www.zymoresearch.com/dna/genomic-dna/cell-soft-tissue-dna/quick-dna-miniprep-plus-kit. [2023-02-13T00:53:10+00:00]. http://www.zymoresearch.com/dna/genomic-dna/cell-soft-tissue-dna/quick-dna-miniprep-plus-kit
