Skip to main content
Engineering Microbiology logoLink to Engineering Microbiology
. 2026 Mar 26;6(2):100272. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2026.100272

Actinobacteria TFDB: An integrated view of transcription factors in Actinobacteria

Yu Fu 1, Zhan-Hui Xu 1, Yi-Fan Liang 1, Shi-Qi Yang 1, Xue-Qin Xie 1, Bang-Ce Ye 1,, Di You 1,
PMCID: PMC13089018  PMID: 42004485

Abstract

Actinobacteria represent a prolific source of bioactive natural products. However, the complex transcriptional regulatory networks in these bacteria, particularly the interplay between transcription factors (TFs) and their regulatory ligands (TF-RLs), remain poorly characterized and lack dedicated resources. In this context, we introduce the Actinobacteria Transcription Factor Database (Actinobacteria TFDB), a comprehensive repository that systematically integrates TF-centric data across 25 representative species. The current version encompasses 629 TFs, classified into 69 families, documents 11,776 TF-target relationships and 28 TF posttranslational modification sites. Uniquely, it features a dedicated collection of 54 experimentally validated TF-RL interactions. Beyond providing standardized annotations, sequence and structural features, and regulatory networks, Actinobacteria TFDB incorporates a specialized TF-RL module that enables interactive exploration and visualization of allosteric regulatory mechanisms. By consolidating multi-dimensional TF data from diverse sources, this resource empowers systems-level analyses and facilitates the rational design of regulatory strategies to activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters and optimize metabolite production. The database is publicly available at http://mingleadgene.com:9315/#/home.

Keywords: Actinobacteria, Transcription factors, Database

Graphical abstract

Image, graphical abstract

1. Introduction

Actinobacteria, a major phylum of Gram-positive bacteria, are distinguished by their sophisticated morphological differentiation and remarkable capacity for producing bioactive secondary metabolites, thereby representing a cornerstone of pharmaceutical discovery and industrial biotechnology [[1], [2], [3]]. Among them, the genus Streptomyces epitomizes the concept of a “natural drug factory” with individual genomes frequently harboring >50 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) dedicated to secondary metabolism [[4], [5], [6]]. However, the inability to activate >60% of these BGCs under conventional cultivation conditions remains a significant obstacle. This phenotypic silence is primarily dictated by multi-layered transcriptional regulatory circuits [7].

The remarkably high abundance of transcription factors (TFs) in actinobacterial genomes represents a fundamental genetic determinant underlying their exceptional capacity for secondary metabolism [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. In the model actinobacteria Streptomyces coelicolor, which possesses a large genome of approximately 8000 genes, an estimated 965 to 1232 genes are predicted to encode TFs, accounting for 12% to 15% of its total gene complement [12]. This proportion is more than double that observed in typical bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, where TFs constitute approximately 5% to 7% of the genome, and rivals the regulatory complexity of certain simple eukaryotes, including Drosophila [[13], [14], [15]]. These transcription factors form elaborate and hierarchical regulatory networks, wherein a single regulator can direct the expression of hundreds of target genes, thereby synchronizing morphological differentiation with the production of antibiotics [8,[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. From a biotechnological perspective, rational engineering of key TFs, via strategies including overexpression or targeted point mutations, has proven highly effective in amplifying antibiotic titers, often by several- to several dozen-fold [17,[22], [23], [24], [25]]. Notable examples include the rewiring of pathway-specific regulators in industrial strains, which has yielded over 50-fold enhancements in the biosynthesis of clinically relevant compounds such as avermectin and daptomycin [[26], [27], [28]]. Collectively, these findings underscore the central importance of TFs in governing the biology of actinobacteria and in driving their industrial exploitation for natural product discovery and optimization.

In addition, TFs are modulated by diverse regulatory ligands, including small-molecule effectors (such as nucleotide second messengers, metabolic intermediates, ions and antibiotics) and protein regulatory ligands [29]. Their binding induces allosteric changes or alters protein interactions, fine-tuning transcriptional responses [30,31]. Small molecules primarily sense environmental and metabolic states, whereas protein regulatory ligands enhance complex assembly and stability [[24], [30], [31]]. This integrated signaling enables the transcriptional reprogramming necessary for adaptation, governing processes from metabolism to antibiotic resistance [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. The centrality of regulatory ligands highlights the multi-layered nature of regulation in Actinobacteria, demanding holistic study through multi-dimensional data that encompass TF sequences, DNA-binding motifs, and regulatory ligand interactions.

While high-throughput methods such as ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq have enabled genome-wide mapping of TF networks in Actinobacteria [37,38], revealing regulatory circuits for antibiotic production and virulence in species such as Saccharopolyspora erythraea and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [39,40], the field remains hindered by data fragmentation. TF functional data are dispersed across studies with inconsistent annotations and available databases are inadequate for integrated analysis. This fragmentation ultimately obstructs a system-level understanding of transcriptional regulation and its application in metabolic engineering.

Here, we developed the Actinobacterial Transcription Factor Database (Actinobacteria TFDB). This database consolidates foundational TF information from sources such as Ensembl, KEGG and UniProt with multi-dimensional features, including experimentally validated TF regulatory ligand interactions. It provides a unified platform for analyzing TF-target networks and regulatory modifications, thereby supporting diverse research aims from elucidating transcriptional mechanisms to guiding natural product discovery and synthetic biology applications. Additionally, the database serves as a reference for industrial strain design via multi-omics data integration. This article outlines the construction pipeline, data sources, and core functionalities of Actinobacteria TFDB, which offers both a roadmap for its ongoing development and a robust, standardized resource for the research community.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Data collection and curation

The data within Actinobacteria TFDB were systematically curated from multiple sources to ensure comprehensiveness and accuracy. Primary data on TFs, including species and family classification, were collected from scientific literature databases (PubMed [41], Web of Science) and functional annotation databases (KEGG database [42], PubChem [43], UniProt [44], NCBI GenBank [41]). To achieve structured storage of standardized data, we developed a closed-loop pipeline for Actinobacteria transcription factor data: first, manual curation built a seed dataset of basic annotations; then, using KEGG gene IDs, a Python crawler retrieved related information from NCBI and UniProtKB, effectively resolving identifier mappings across databases. After cleaning and standardization including generating hyperlinks to external resources, the data was exported as an Excel file conforming to the MySQL table schema. Finally, a Java program mapped Excel headers to database fields for batch warehousing, with support for exception logging and resumable uploads.

The quality of the integrated data was ensured through rigorous cross-verification and manual scrutiny of information from the various sources. To ensure data quality, we implemented a dual-validation approach combining automated screening with manual review, where customized SQL statements were first used to detect anomalies across multi-dimensional data, followed by manual verification, confirmation, and correction of flagged entries. This process ensured data uniqueness and completeness by validating the uniqueness of transcription factor records based on species, TF name, and gene ID; verifying target gene uniqueness by species and gene ID; confirming TF family classification integrity through record counts; assessing species coverage breadth; and ensuring uniqueness of TF-regulatory ligand associations via a quadruple of TF name, ligand name, species, and external ID. The final curated dataset provides multi-dimensional information for each TF, which is organized and presented through several core modules on the website. These primarily include Basic Information, Transcript details, and TF-RL interactions. For instance, using a known KEGG identifier, users can access a dedicated information page with links to external resources like KEGG, enabling them to obtain deep functional insights such as family classification, protein sequence, and involvement in biochemical pathways. Similarly, searches using an Ensembl ID or a UniProt Swiss-Prot ID provide direct links to the respective databases, granting access to key sequence data, structural details, and domain characteristics of the TFs. By integrating these diverse categories of information, Actinobacteria TFDB offers users a specific and comprehensive overview of their TF of interest (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1 dummy alt text

Data processing workflow of Actinobacteria TFDB. The data processing workflow in Actinobacteria TFDB includes four main parts: (top)Multi-source data collection and standardized verification; (left) Data processing and integration, including Excel-based input, automated SQL generation with GO term annotation, and final database deployment via a CentOS 7.9 server; (bottom) Detailed information display, presenting basic information, transcript details, and TF-RL; (right) User function modules, supporting keyword-based and category-based searches.

2.2. Database contents

Actinobacteria TFDB is a comprehensive, specialized resource dedicated to the TFs of Actinobacteria. The current release systematically integrates data across 25 species, encompassing 629 TFs, 69 TF families, 11,776 TF-target relationships, 28 TF posttranslational modification sites and a unique collection of 54 experimentally validated TF-RL interactions (Table 1). The integrated dataset is accessible through a user-friendly web interface with the following core pages, each designed to facilitate specific research queries and data exploration.

Table 1.

Coverage of TFs in the Actinobacteria TFDB database.

Species TF numbers
Mycobacterium smegmatis 292
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv 182
Mycolicibacterium smegmatis MC2 155 1
Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338 11
Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2341 1
Saccharopolyspora pogona NRRL30141 7
Saccharopolyspora spinosa 1
Streptomyces avermitilis ATCC31267 10
Streptomyces avermitilis KA320 3
Streptomyces chartreusis NRRL 3882 1
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) 82
Streptomyces cyanogenus S136 1
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NBRC 13,350 6
Streptomyces griseus [Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. palearctica Y11] 1
Streptomyces lincolnensis 5
Streptomyces lydicus NRRL 2433 1
Streptomyces pactum Act12 2
Streptomyces pristinaespiralis 1
Streptomyces pristinaespiralis NRRL2958 4
Streptomyces rapamycinicus 1
Streptomyces roseosporus SW0702 1
Streptomyces sp ATCC 55,186 1
Streptomyces venezuelae 2
Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC 10,712 11
Streptomycessp. CS40 1

The Home page serves as the central gateway to the database. It provides a concise overview of the biological significance of Actinobacterial TFs and the database's core content. A prominent and convenient search function is placed directly on this page, allowing users to immediately initiate queries by entering a TF name, species, or database identifier (Ensembl ID, UniProt ID). It ensures that both new and returning users can quickly access the core functionality of the database.

The dedicated Search page offers two versatile and complementary modes for data retrieval (Fig. 2a). The "Search by Keyword" mode supports flexible querying by letting users enter any transcription factor-related identifier in a unified input box. For more targeted investigations, the "Search by Category" mode enables users to filter data through multiple biologically relevant criteria. (Fig. 2b). The search results are presented in a sortable table with key annotation information (Fig. 2c). Each entry in the results table includes a "View" button, which directs the user to a dedicated detail page for comprehensive information (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2.

Fig 2 dummy alt text

Search interface of Actinobacteria TFDB. (a) Main search interface. (b) Interface for category-based search with filtering options. (c) Sortable summary table for displaying matched search results. (d) Dedicated page for presenting complete annotation information of individual transcription factors.

In the Species page, we classify TFs by species and construct a tree diagram, which illustrates the associations between different Actinobacteria species and various TF families (Fig. 3a). Users can access information on TFs from 25 Actinobacteria species in this section, and clicking on relevant nodes allows viewing of corresponding details. Following this is the percentage of family members section, which uses a pie chart to present the proportion of different TFs, with families such as TetR and LysR each having their corresponding proportion values (Fig. 3b). This design enables users to intuitively understand the composition of TFs in specific species and facilitates in-depth exploration of species-specific characteristics related to transcriptional regulation in Actinobacteria.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3 dummy alt text

Visualization of transcription factor classification and family distribution. (a) Association graph on the Species page: First-level nodes represent Actinobacterial species; selection of a species node reveals second-level nodes of associated TF families. (b) Proportional distribution of TF families, visualized as an arc chart on the Species page. (c) Hierarchical tree diagram on the TF page: First-level nodes denote TF families, which expand into second-level nodes of individual TFs upon selection. (d) Multi-level circular chart on the TF page: The outermost ring shows the relative abundance of all TF families; interaction with the corresponding region navigates detailed views of family and member composition.

The TF page provides a global overview of all transcription factors within the database. It features an interactive association graph that visually maps the connections between Actinobacteria species and their diverse TFs. TFs are systematically classified into a tree diagram by family; selecting any family node expands the structure to reveal its constituent TFs, and choosing a specific TF prompts a summary information box to appear below (Fig. 3c). Complementing this, a hierarchical pie chart intuitively displays the distribution of TF families across the dataset (Fig. 3d). The initial view shows the proportional representation of each family. Selecting a specific sector drill down to a second level, which details the selected family's composition, while a third level is accessible by selecting an individual TF. The page concludes with the "Basic Domains Group" section, which dynamically presents all TFs in a tabular format, including Ensembl ID, Gene ID, Family, and Species. A "View" button, available both in the summary pop-up and the table, directs users to the dedicated detail page for any TF. Collectively, this page facilitates systematic exploration of the distribution patterns and characteristics of TFs from different families, enabling users to filter and retrieve relevant information based on their transcription factor of interest.

A defining feature and core advantage of the Actinobacteria TFDB is its integration of experimentally validated TF-RL interactions. This type of curated functional data remains relatively scarce in existing databases, yet it is crucial for deciphering the sophisticated regulatory networks that govern Actinobacterial physiology and secondary metabolism [45]. As summarized in Table 2, the database currently documents over 30 specific TF-RL pairs across 8 species, providing a unique resource for investigating signal perception and allosteric regulation. The compiled TF-RL interactions involve a diverse array of key regulatory molecules, which can be categorized into several functional classes, including cyclic nucleotide second messengers, key metabolic intermediates, and antibiotic-derived signaling molecules [[46], [47], [48]].

Table 2.

Coverage of known TF-RLs in the Actinobacteria TFDB database.

Species TF TF-RL
Mycobacterium smegmatis EtbR ethambutol [49]
Mycobacterium smegmatis Lsr2 cyclic di-3′,5′-guanylate [50]
Mycobacterium smegmatis XbpR D-xylose [51]
Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338 DasR c-di-AMP [52]
Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338 BldD c-di-GMP [53]
Saccharopolyspora erythraea NRRL 2338` GlnR acetylated GlnA1 [54]
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv Rv0273c ethambutol [49]
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv Rv1473A adenosine 5′-triphosphate [55]
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv Rv2640c cupric cation [56]
Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC 10,712 RmdA c-di-GMP [57]
Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC 10,712 RmdB c-di-GMP [57]
Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NBRC 13,350 ArpA cAMP [58]
Streptomyces avermitilis AccR methylcrotonyl-CoA [59]
Streptomyces avermitilis AccR propionyl-CoA [59]
Streptomyces avermitilis AccR acetyl-CoA [59]
Streptomyces avermitilis SAV4189 hygromycin B [60]
Streptomyces avermitilis SAV4189 thiostrepton [60]
Streptomyces lincolnensis SLCG_Lrp arginine [47]
Streptomyces lincolnensis SLCG_Lrp phenylalanine [47]
Streptomyces avermitilis AveT avermectin B1 [48]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) AdpA sulfane sulfur [61]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) BldD cyclic di-3′,5′-guanylate [62]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) BldD nitric oxide [62]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) CatR hydrogen peroxide [63]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) CdaR tryptophan [64]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Crp cAMP [65]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) DasR N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine [66]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) GluR glutamic acid [67]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) HypR zinc ion [68]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) HypR L-hydroxyproline [68]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SCO3361 L-phenylalanine [10]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SCO3361 L-cysteine [10]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) NmtR nickel (2+) [69]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) NmtR cobalt (2+) [69]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) NsrR nitric oxide [70]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) OxyR hydrogen peroxide [71]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) ScbA Streptomyces gamma-butyrolactone 1 [72]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) ScbR Streptomyces gamma-butyrolactone 1 [72]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) ScbR2 jadomycin B [73]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) ScbR2 actinomycin D [74]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) ScbR2 undecylprodigiosin [74]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SlbR Streptomyces gamma-butyrolactone 1 [40]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SoxR phenazine methosulfate [75]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SoxR p-Benzoquinone [75]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SoxR plumbagin [75]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) SoxR diamide [75]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) StgR γ-actinorhodin [76]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) TamR citrate [77]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) TamR trans-aconitate [76]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) TamR cis-aconitate [76]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) TamR 1-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid [76]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) XdhR guanosine 3′,5′-bis(diphosphate) [78]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) XdhR guanosine3′-diphosphate 5′-triphosphate [78]
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) XdhR guanosine 5′-triphosphate [79]

To maximize the utility of this unique dataset, we developed a dedicated TF-RL search module. This module is specifically designed to store, retrieve, and display the high-quality, experimentally validated interaction data highlighted in Table 2. It integrates auxiliary structural and functional annotations from authoritative external databases, including the Protein Data Bank (PDB) for 3D structural context and UniProt for sequence and domain information, thereby constructing a comprehensive data framework for each interaction.

To enable efficient and diverse querying of the curated TF-RL interactions, the module features a user-centric search system operating through two complementary modes: a flexible keyword search for direct queries using TF names, regulatory ligand names, or species, and a targeted category search that allows for filtering across predefined biological dimensions such as TF Name, TF Family, TF-RL Type, and Source Species (Fig. 4a, b). The category search interface is streamlined with "Submit" and "Reset" buttons for effortless refinement. Search results are presented in a paginated table, clearly displaying key columns including TF Name, TF Family, TF-RL Name, and Source Species, with a crucial "View" button in the "Details" column (Fig. 4c). Clicking this button navigates to a dedicated, comprehensive information page for the specific TF-RL pair. This page features a structured layout centered on a "Basic Information" section that integrates extensive data, typically encompassing TF details, regulatory ligand information, interaction context, and direct cross-references to external databases, allowing users to access a holistic functional profile without needing to navigate multiple external platforms (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4.

Fig 4 dummy alt text

TF-RL interaction search interface of Actinobacteria TFDB. (a) Search interface supporting both keyword and category-based queries. (b) Category search panel with filters for TF name, TF-RL name, and species. (c) Search results are listed in a paginated table; the “View” button leads to a dedicated detail page. (d) The detail page provides comprehensive information, including TF and regulatory ligand names, source species, and links to external databases such as UniProt and PDB.

Unlike general resources such as GTRD [80] and KnockTF 2.0 [81], which are eukaryote-centric, or specialized tools like RiboD [82] and RSwitch [83] that focus only on riboswitches, Actinobacteria TFDB provides comprehensive Actinobacteria-specific TF data. Compared to prokaryote-focused databases such as CollecTF [84], LogoMotif [85], and RegPrecise [86], our platform integrates TF sequences, TF–RL interactions, target genes, and posttranslational modification sites (Table 3). Notably, RegPrecise [86] lacks key Actinobacteria regulators like PhoP [87] and BldD [88], limiting its utility for systematic studies in this phylum. These comparisons highlight the unique and integrative value of Actinobacteria TFDB.

Table 3.

Comparison of transcriptional regulation-related databases.

Database Species Focus Area Regulatory Ligand Query Core Functions
RiboD Prokaryotes Riboswitches None Predict, annotate and visualize prokaryotic riboswitches
RSwitch Prokaryotes Riboswitches None Analyze riboswitch sequence/structure; evaluate drug targets for pathogenic bacteria
GTRD Eukaryotes TF and transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) None Integrate ChIP-seq/DNase-seq data; predict and analyze eukaryotic TFBS
KnockTF 2.0 Eukaryotes TF, TF-RL and target genes Available Integrate knockdown/knockout data; annotate and analyze TF target genes
CollecTF Prokaryotes TF and TFBS None Integrate bacterial TFBS experimental data; conduct motif alignment and analysis
LogoMotif Actinobacteria TF, TFBS and target genes None Predict and visualize actinobacteria TFBS; support BGC regulatory locus analysis
RegPrecise Prokaryotes TF, TF-RL and TF-target genes Available Classify, visualize and analyze conservation of prokaryotic TF
Actinobacteria TFDB Actinobacteria TF, TF-RL and TF-target genes and posttranslational modification sites Available TF annotation and regulatory network visualization

3. Discussion

Actinobacteria TFDB was created to integrate the fragmented landscape of transcriptional regulation data in Actinobacteria. Through the systematic consolidation of TF data across 25 species, it directly tackles the challenge of data dispersion and the inadequacy of existing general resources. All TF-target gene relationships in this study were defined based on systematic literature mining and are supported by published experimental evidence. The database strategically encompasses key model species such as Streptomyces coelicolor and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, thereby providing support for antibiotic development and research into host-pathogen dynamics. A key feature of this database is its collection of experimentally validated TF-RL interactions, which offers molecular-level insight into signal integration in Actinobacteria. Furthermore, the systematic annotation of TF families and orthologs enables systems-level analyses previously constrained by data fragmentation. These resources support rational approaches to strain engineering, with potential applications in developing antimicrobials and other high-value compounds.

Actinobacteria are known for their production of diverse bioactive compounds, and their genomes contain a vast reservoir of silent biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Activating these BGCs through rational manipulation of transcriptional regulators is a key objective in the field [89]. Actinobacteria TFDB could serve as a platform for this purpose by mapping the master transcriptional switches of BGCs and the regulatory ligands that regulate them. For instance, a researcher studying antibiotic production in Streptomyces can search for the TF BldD to obtain its regulatory ligands, target genes involved in secondary metabolism, and associated pathway information. This allows identification of potential targets for genetic engineering to enhance antibiotic yield. Another example: users can input a target gene such as SCO5085 (actII-ORF4, a pathway-specific activator in actinorhodin biosynthesis) to perform a reverse query and identify upstream TFs regulating its expression. Additionally, by integrating transcriptional network data with homology information, researchers can predict regulatory mechanisms for uncharacterized TFs in nonmodel strains. These applications demonstrate how the database supports hypothesis-driven experimental design in metabolic engineering and natural product discovery.

Actinobacteria TFDB remains a work in progress with several directions planned for its development. Incremental updates will be performed annually with a formal version and data package released. New KEGG genome data will be integrated, TF-target relationships supplemented through literature mining, and TF family classifications updated according to international standards. Each update undergoes format, logic, and manual verification. Future versions will broaden taxonomic representation, integrate ChIP-seq and other functional genomic datasets, and offer user-friendly tools for binding site and network analysis. Community feedback will be essential for expanding TF-RL interaction data, validating predicted functions, and maintaining annotation accuracy. Together, these efforts will ensure the database continues to serve as a unified, species-specific platform for studying Actinobacterial transcriptional regulation. By centralizing dispersed data and providing accessible interfaces, Actinobacteria TFDB aims to accelerate research in microbial genetics, natural product biosynthesis, and strain engineering.

Data availability statement

The web interface to the database is available at http://mingleadgene.com:9315/#/home.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yu Fu: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis. Zhan-Hui Xu: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis. Yi-Fan Liang: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis. Shi-Qi Yang: Investigation, Formal analysis. Xue-Qin Xie: Investigation, Formal analysis. Bang-Ce Ye: Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Di You: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFA0917100 to Bang-Ce Ye), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32570075 to Di You; 32500065 to Yu Fu), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (25ZR1401089 to Di You), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JKF01251633 to Di You), and Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research (22TQ1400100-14 to Di You).

Contributor Information

Bang-Ce Ye, Email: bcye@ecust.edu.cn.

Di You, Email: 030111115@mail.ecust.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Koech S.C., Plechatá M., Pathom-aree W., Kamenik Z., Jaisi A. Strategies for actinobacteria isolation, cultivation, and metabolite production that are biologically important. ACS Omega. 2025;10:15923–15934. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c01344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ventura M., Canchaya C., Tauch A., Chandra G., Fitzgerald G.F., Chater K.F., van Sinderen D. Genomics ofActinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007;71:495–548. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00005-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azman A.-S., Mawang C.-I., Khairat J.-E., AbuBakar S. Actinobacteria—A promising natural source of anti-biofilm agents. Int. Microbiol. 2019;22:403–409. doi: 10.1007/s10123-019-00066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barka E.A., Vatsa P., Sanchez L., Gaveau-Vaillant N., Jacquard C., Klenk H.-P., Clément C., Ouhdouch Y., van Wezel G.P. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016;80:1–43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang X., Wang R., Kang Q., Bai L. The antitumor agent Ansamitocin P-3 binds to cell division protein FtsZ in actinosynnema pretiosum. Biomolecules. 2020;10:699. doi: 10.3390/biom10050699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu Y., Kang Q., Zhang L.-L., Bai L. Subtilisin-involved morphology engineering for improved antibiotic production in actinomycetes. Biomolecules. 2020;10:851. doi: 10.3390/biom10060851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tomm H.A., Ucciferri L., Ross A.C. Advances in microbial culturing conditions to activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters for novel metabolite production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;46:1381–1400. doi: 10.1007/s10295-019-02198-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bibb M.J. Regulation of secondary metabolism in streptomycetes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005;8:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Wezel G.P., McDowall K.J. The regulation of the secondary metabolism of streptomyces: new links and experimental advances. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:1311. doi: 10.1039/c1np00003a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu J., Li J., Dong H., Chen Y., Wang Y., Wu H., Li C., Weaver D.T., Zhang L., Zhang B. Characterization of an Lrp/AsnC family regulator SCO3361, controlling actinorhodin production and morphological development in Streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:5773–5783. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8339-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mu X., Lei R., Yan S., Deng Z., Liu R., Liu T. The LysR family transcriptional regulator ORF-L16 regulates spinosad biosynthesis in saccharopolyspora spinosa. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2024;9:609–617. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Castro-Melchor M., Charaniya S., Karypis G., Takano E., Hu W.-S. Genome-wide inference of regulatory networks in Streptomyces coelicolor. BMC Genom. 2010;11:578. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Babu M.Madan, Teichmann S.A. Functional determinants of transcription factors in Escherichia coli: protein families and binding sites. Trends Genet. 2003;19:75–79. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Riechmann J.L., Heard J., Martin G., Reuber L., Jiang C.Z., Keddie J., Adam L., Pineda O., Ratcliffe O.J., Samaha R.R., Creelman R., Pilgrim M., Broun P., Zhang J.Z., Ghandehari D., Sherman B.K., Yu G.L. Arabidopsis Transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science. 2000;290:2105–2110. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5499.2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim W., Lee N., Hwang S., Lee Y., Kim J., Cho S., Palsson B., Cho B.-K. Comparative genomics determines strain-dependent secondary metabolite production in streptomyces venezuelae strains. Biomolecules. 2020;10:864. doi: 10.3390/biom10060864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ohnishi Y., Yamazaki H., Kato J.-y., Tomono A., Horinouchi S., AdpA a. Central transcriptional regulator in the A-factor regulatory cascade that leads to morphological development and secondary metabolism inStreptomyces griseus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014;69:431–439. doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Higo A., Hara H., Horinouchi S., Ohnishi Y. Genome-wide distribution of AdpA, a global regulator for secondary metabolism and morphological differentiation in streptomyces, revealed the extent and complexity of the AdpA regulatory network. DNA Res. 2012;19:259–274. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dss010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang D., Li Z.-H., You D., Zhou Y., Ye B.-C. Lysine acetylproteome analysis suggests its roles in primary and secondary metabolism in saccharopolyspora erythraea. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;99:1399–1413. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martín J.F., Liras P., Sánchez S. Modulation of gene expression in actinobacteria by translational modification of transcriptional factors and secondary metabolite biosynthetic enzymes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:630694. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.630694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mao X.-M., Luo S., Zhou R.-C., Wang F., Yu P., Sun N., Chen X.-X., Tang Y., Li Y.-Q. Transcriptional regulation of the daptomycin gene cluster in Streptomyces roseosporus by an autoregulator, AtrA. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:7992–8001. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.608273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang P., Zhao Z., Li H., Chen X.-L., Deng Z., Bai L., Pang X. Production of the antibiotic FR-008/candicidin in Streptomyces sp FR-008 is co-regulated by two regulators, FscRI and FscRIV, from different transcription factor families. Microbiology-SGM. 2015;161:539–552. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shu W., Stegmüller J., Rodriguez-Estevez M., Rückert-Reed C., Kalinowski J., Gromyko O., Rebets Y., Luzhetskyy A., Wittmann C. Metabolic engineering of Streptomyces explomaris for increased production of the reverse antibiotic nybomycin. Microb. Cell Fact. 2025;24:227. doi: 10.1186/s12934-025-02860-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu J., Chen Y., Wang W., Ren M., Wu P., Wang Y., Li C., Zhang L., Wu H., Weaver D.T., Zhang B. Engineering of an Lrp family regulator SACE_Lrp improves erythromycin production in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. Metab. Eng. 2017;39:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu P., Chen K., Li B., Zhang Y., Wu H., Chen Y., Ren S., Khan S., Zhang L., Zhang B. Polyketide starter and extender units serve as regulatory ligands to coordinate the biosynthesis of antibiotics in actinomycetes. Mbio. 2021;12 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02298-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.B. Yang, Z. Li, J. Zhang, S. Qiu, X. Liu, Z. Liang, H. Yan, Y. Zhang, L. Liu, B. Xia, L. Bao, D. Li, S. Zhou, C. Corre, C. Zhang, Y. Lu, G.-Y. Tan, X. Xia, S. Li, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Scalable secondary metabolite production in Streptomyces using a plug-and-play system, Nat. Biotechnol. (2025) advance online publication. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Zhuo Y., Zhang W., Chen D., Gao H., Tao J., Liu M., Gou Z., Zhou X., Ye B.-C., Zhang Q., Zhang S., Zhang L.-X. Reverse biological engineering of hrdB to enhance the production of avermectins in an industrial strain of Streptomyces avermitilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:11250–11254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006085107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen Q., Zhu J., Li X., Wen Y. Transcriptional regulator DasR represses daptomycin production through both direct and cascade mechanisms in streptomyces roseosporus. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1065. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang H., Sha W., Liu Z., Tang T., Liu H., Qin L., Cui Z., Chen J., Liu F., Zheng R., Huang X., Wang J., Feng Y., Ge B. Lysine acetylation of DosR regulates the hypoxia response of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0032-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martín J.F., Liras P. The balance metabolism safety net: integration of stress signals by interacting transcriptional factors in streptomyces and related actinobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3120. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shi J., Feng Z., Xu J., Li F., Zhang Y., Wen A., Wang F., Song Q., Wang L., Cui H., Tong S., Chen P., Zhu Y., Zhao G., Wang S., Feng Y., Lin W. Structural insights into the transcription activation mechanism of the global regulator GlnR from actinobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300282120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tabib-Salazar A., Liu B., Doughty P., Lewis R.A., Ghosh S., Parsy M.-L., Simpson P.J., O’Dwyer K., Matthews S.J., Paget M.S. The actinobacterial transcription factor RbpA binds to the principal sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:5679–5691. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rabhi N., Hannou S.A., Froguel P., Annicotte J.-S. Cofactors As metabolic sensors driving cell adaptation in physiology and disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2017;8:304. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bei C., Zhu J., Culviner P.H., Gan M., Rubin E.J., Fortune S.M., Gao Q., Liu Q. Genetically encoded transcriptional plasticity underlies stress adaptation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:3088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47410-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu J.-h., Chen X.-w., Liu Y.-l., Wu J.-y., Chen Z.-g., Peng B. Metabolism-dependent succinylation governs resource allocation for antibiotic resistance. Sci. Adv. 2025;11:eadu2856. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen Y.-T., Lohia G.K., Chen S., Riquelme S.A. Immunometabolic regulation of bacterial infection, biofilms, and antibiotic susceptibility. J. Innate Immun. 2024;16:143–158. doi: 10.1159/000536649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Auriol C., Bestel-Corre G., Claude J.-B., Soucaille P., Meynial-Salles I. Stress-induced evolution of Escherichia coli points to original concepts in respiratory cofactor selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108:1278–1283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010431108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Satam H., Joshi K., Mangrolia U., Waghoo S., Zaidi G., Rawool S., Thakare R.P., Banday S., Mishra A.K., Das G., Malonia S.K. Next-generation sequencing technology: current trends and advancements. Biology. 2023;12:997. doi: 10.3390/biology12070997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seshadri R., Roux S., Huber K.J., Wu D., Yu S., Udwary D., Call L., Nayfach S., Hahnke R.L., Pukall R., White J.R., Varghese N.J., Webb C., Palaniappan K., Reimer L.C., Sardà J., Bertsch J., Mukherjee S., Reddy T.B.K., Hajek P.P., Huntemann M., Chen I.M.A., Spunde A., Clum A., Shapiro N., Wu Z.-Y., Zhao Z., Zhou Y., Evtushenko L., Thijs S., Stevens V., Eloe-Fadrosh E.A., Mouncey N.J., Yoshikuni Y., Whitman W.B., Klenk H.-P., Woyke T., Göker M., Kyrpides N.C., Ivanova N.N. Expanding the genomic encyclopedia of actinobacteria with 824 isolate reference genomes. Cell Genomics. 2022;2:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Galagan J.E., Minch K., Peterson M., Lyubetskaya A., Azizi E., Sweet L., Gomes A., Rustad T., Dolganov G., Glotova I., Abeel T., Mahwinney C., Kennedy A.D., Allard R., Brabant W., Krueger A., Jaini S., Honda B., Yu W.-H., Hickey M.J., Zucker J., Garay C., Weiner B., Sisk P., Stolte C., Winkler J.K., Van de Peer Y., Iazzetti P., Camacho D., Dreyfuss J., Liu Y., Dorhoi A., Mollenkopf H.-J., Drogaris P., Lamontagne J., Zhou Y., Piquenot J., Park S.T., Raman S., Kaufmann S.H.E., Mohney R.P., Chelsky D., Moody D.B., Sherman D.R., Schoolnik G.K. The mycobacterium tuberculosis regulatory network and hypoxia. Nature. 2013;499:178–183. doi: 10.1038/nature12337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang Y.-H., Song E., Kim J.-N., Lee B.-R., Kim E.-J., Park S.-H., Kim W.-S., Park H.-Y., Jeon J.-M., Rajesh T., Kim Y.-G., Kim B.-G. Characterization of a new ScbR-like γ-butyrolactone binding regulator (SlbR) in Streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;96:113–121. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3803-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sayers E.W., Bolton E.E., Brister J.R., Canese K., Chan J., Comeau Donald C., Connor R., Funk K., Kelly C., Kim S., Madej T., Marchler-Bauer A., Lanczycki C., Lathrop S., Lu Z., Thibaud-Nissen F., Murphy T., Phan L., Skripchenko Y., Tse T., Wang J., Williams R., Trawick Barton W., Pruitt Kim D., Sherry Stephen T. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D20–D26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kanehisa M., Furumichi M., Sato Y., Kawashima M., Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D587–D592. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim S., Chen J., Cheng T., Gindulyte A., He J., He S., Li Q., Shoemaker B.A., Thiessen P.A., Yu B., Zaslavsky L., Zhang J., Bolton E.E. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1388–D1395. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.UniProt: the Universal protein knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:D609–D617. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zorro-Aranda A., Escorcia-Rodríguez J.M., González-Kise J.K., Freyre-González J.A. Curation, inference, and assessment of a globally reconstructed gene regulatory network for Streptomyces coelicolor. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:2840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06658-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tschowri N., Schumacher Maria A., Schlimpert S., Chinnam Naga b., Findlay Kim C., Brennan Richard G., Buttner Mark J. Tetrameric c-di-GMP mediates effective transcription factor dimerization to control streptomyces development. Cell. 2014;158:1136–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xu Y., Tang Y., Wang N., Liu J., Cai X., Cai H., Li J., Tan G., Liu R., Bai L., Zhang L., Wu H., Zhang B. Transcriptional regulation of a leucine-responsive regulatory protein for directly controlling lincomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces lincolnensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;104:2575–2587. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10381-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu W., Zhang Q., Guo J., Chen Z., Li J., Wen Y., Elliot M.A. Increasing avermectin production in streptomyces avermitilis by manipulating the expression of a novel TetR-Family regulator and its target gene product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:5157–5173. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00868-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu C., Liu Y., Hu L., Yang M., He Z.G. Molecular mechanism of the synergistic activity of ethambutol and isoniazid against mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:16741–16750. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ling X., Liu X., Wang K., Guo M., Ou Y., Li D., Xiang Y., Zheng J., Hu L., Zhang H., Li W. Lsr2 acts as a cyclic di-GMP receptor that promotes keto-mycolic acid synthesis and biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:695. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44774-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang K., Cui X., Ling X., Chen J., Zheng J., Xiang Y., Li W. d-xylose blocks the broad negative regulation of XylR on lipid metabolism and affects multiple physiological characteristics in mycobacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24 doi: 10.3390/ijms24087086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.You D., Zhao L.C., Fu Y., Peng Z.Y., Chen Z.Q., Ye B.C. Allosteric regulation by c-di-AMP modulates a complete N-acetylglucosamine signaling cascade in saccharopolyspora erythraea. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:3825. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48063-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fu Y., Dong Y.Q., Shen J.L., Yin B.C., Ye B.C., You D. A meet-up of acetyl phosphate and c-di-GMP modulates BldD activity for development and antibiotic production. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:6870–6882. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.You D., Yin B.C., Li Z.H., Zhou Y., Yu W.B., Zuo P., Ye B.C. Sirtuin-dependent reversible lysine acetylation of glutamine synthetases reveals an autofeedback loop in nitrogen metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016;113:6653–6658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525654113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Duan W., Li X., Ge Y., Yu Z., Li P., Li J., Qin L., Xie J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv1473 is a novel macrolides ABC efflux pump regulated by WhiB7. Future Microbiol. 2019;14:47–59. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rowland J.L., Niederweis M. A multicopper oxidase is required for copper resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:3724–3733. doi: 10.1128/JB.00546-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Haist J., Neumann S.A., Al-Bassam M.M., Lindenberg S., Elliot M.A., Tschowri N. Specialized and shared functions of diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases in Streptomyces development. Mol. Microbiol. 2020;114:808–822. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Horinouchi S., Ohnishi Y., Kang D.K. The A-factor regulatory cascade and cAMP in the regulation of physiological and morphological development in Streptomyces griseus. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001;27:177–182. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lyu M., Cheng Y., Han X., Wen Y., Song Y., Li J., Chen Z. AccR, a TetR family transcriptional repressor, coordinates short-chain acyl coenzyme A homeostasis in streptomyces avermitilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;86 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00508-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guo J., Zhang X., Lu X., Liu W., Chen Z., Li J., Deng L., Wen Y. SAV4189, a MarR-Family regulator in Streptomyces avermitilis, Activates Avermectin Biosynthesis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1358. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lu T., Wu X., Cao Q., Xia Y., Xun L., Liu H. Sulfane sulfur posttranslationally modifies the global regulator AdpA to influence actinorhodin production and morphological differentiation of streptomyces coelicolor. mBio. 2022;13 doi: 10.1128/mbio.03862-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Honma S., Ito S., Yajima S., Sasaki Y. Nitric oxide signaling for aerial mycelium formation in streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) M145. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022;88 doi: 10.1128/aem.01222-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hahn J.S., Oh S.Y., Chater K.F., Cho Y.H., Roe J.H. H2O2-sensitive fur-like repressor CatR regulating the major catalase gene in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:38254–38260. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006079200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Palazzotto E., Renzone G., Fontana P., Botta L., Scaloni A., Puglia A.M., Gallo G. Tryptophan promotes morphological and physiological differentiation in Streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:10177–10189. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Derouaux A., Dehareng D., Lecocq E., Halici S., Nothaft H., Giannotta F., Moutzourelis G., Dusart J., Devreese B., Titgemeyer F., Van Beeumen J., Rigali S. Crp of Streptomyces coelicolor is the third transcription factor of the large CRP-FNR superfamily able to bind cAMP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;325:983–990. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nothaft H., Rigali S., Boomsma B., Swiatek M., McDowall K.J., van Wezel G.P., Titgemeyer F. The permease gene nagE2 is the key to N-acetylglucosamine sensing and utilization in Streptomyces coelicolor and is subject to multi-level control. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;75:1133–1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Li L., Jiang W., Lu Y. A novel two-component system, GluR-GluK, involved in glutamate sensing and uptake in streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 2017;199 doi: 10.1128/JB.00097-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kotowska M., Świat M., Zarȩba-Pasławska J., Jaworski P., Pawlik K. A GntR-like transcription factor HypR regulates expression of genes associated with l-hydroxyproline utilization in streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1451. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kim H.M., Ahn B.E., Lee J.H., Roe J.H. Regulation of a nickel-cobalt efflux system and nickel homeostasis in a soil actinobacterium streptomyces coelicolor. Metallomics. 2015;7:702–709. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00318g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Volbeda A., Dodd E.L., Darnault C., Crack J.C., Renoux O., Hutchings M.I., Le Brun N.E., Fontecilla-Camps J.C. Crystal structures of the NO sensor NsrR reveal how its iron-sulfur cluster modulates DNA binding. Nat. Commun. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hahn J.S., Oh S.Y., Roe J.H. Role of OxyR as a peroxide-sensing positive regulator in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:5214–5222. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.19.5214-5222.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Takano E., Chakraburtty R., Nihira T., Yamada Y., Bibb M.J. A complex role for the gamma-butyrolactone SCB1 in regulating antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Mol. Microbiol. 2001;41:1015–1028. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wang W., Ji J., Li X., Wang J., Li S., Pan G., Fan K., Yang K. Angucyclines as signals modulate the behaviors of Streptomyces coelicolor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:5688–5693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324253111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Xu G., Wang J., Wang L., Tian X., Yang H., Fan K., Yang K., Tan H. Pseudo" gamma-butyrolactone receptors respond to antibiotic signals to coordinate antibiotic biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:27440–27448. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.143081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lee K.L., Yoo J.S., Oh G.S., Singh A.K., Roe J.H. Simultaneous activation of iron- and thiol-based sensor-regulator systems by redox-active compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:139. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Huang H., Grove A. The transcriptional regulator TamR from Streptomyces coelicolor controls a key step in central metabolism during oxidative stress. Mol. Microbiol. 2013;87:1151–1166. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Huang H., Sivapragasam S., Grove A. The regulatory role of Streptomyces coelicolor TamR in central metabolism. Biochem. J. 2015;466:347–358. doi: 10.1042/BJ20130838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sivapragasam S., Grove A. Streptomyces coelicolor XdhR is a direct target of ppGpp that controls expression of genes encoding xanthine dehydrogenase to promote purine salvage. Mol. Microbiol. 2016;100:701–718. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mao X.M., Sun Z.H., Liang B.R., Wang Z.B., Feng W.H., Huang F.L., Li Y.Q. Positive feedback regulation of stgR expression for secondary metabolism in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:2072–2078. doi: 10.1128/JB.00040-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yevshin I., Sharipov R., Kolmykov S., Kondrakhin Y., Kolpakov F. GTRD: a database on gene transcription regulation—2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D100–D105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Feng C., Song C., Liu Y., Qian F., Gao Y., Ning Z., Wang Q., Jiang Y., Li Y., Li M., Chen J., Zhang J., Li C. KnockTF: a comprehensive human gene expression profile database with knockdown/knockout of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D93–D100. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mukherjee S., Das Mandal S., Gupta N., Drory-Retwitzer M., Barash D., Sengupta S. RiboD: a comprehensive database for prokaryotic riboswitches. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:3541–3543. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Penchovsky R., Pavlova N., Kaloudas D. RSwitch: a novel bioinformatics database on riboswitches as antibacterial drug targets. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2021;18:804–808. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.2983922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kiliç S., White E.R., Sagitova D.M., Cornish J.P., Erill I. CollecTF: a database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D156–D160. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Augustijn H.E., Karapliafis D., Joosten K.M.M., Rigali S., van Wezel G.P., Medema M.H. LogoMotif: a comprehensive database of transcription factor binding site profiles in actinobacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 2024;436:168558. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Novichkov P.S., Kazakov A.E., Ravcheev D.A., Leyn S.A., Kovaleva G.Y., Sutormin R.A., Kazanov M.D., Riehl W., Arkin A.P., Dubchak I., Rodionov D.A. RegPrecise 3.0–a resource for genome-scale exploration of transcriptional regulation in bacteria. BMC Genom. 2013;14:745. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ryndak M., Wang S., Smith I. PhoP, a key player in mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:528–534. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yan H., Lu X., Sun D., Zhuang S., Chen Q., Chen Z., Li J., Wen Y. BldD, a master developmental repressor, activates antibiotic production in two Streptomyces species. Mol. Microbiol. 2020;113:123–142. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van der Heul H.U., Bilyk B.L., McDowall K.J., Seipke R.F., van Wezel G.P. Regulation of antibiotic production in actinobacteria: new perspectives from the post-genomic era. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018;35:575–604. doi: 10.1039/c8np00012c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The web interface to the database is available at http://mingleadgene.com:9315/#/home.


Articles from Engineering Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Shandong University

RESOURCES