Abstract
The characteristic oral environment – with its dynamic clearance, moisture, microbial load, and inflammatory potential – makes oral diseases highly prevalent and therapeutically challenging. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), an emerging class of inorganic–organic hybrid porous coordination materials, have become pivotal in modern biomedical engineering due to their facile synthesis, high surface area, large loading capacity, exceptional ion storage capability, tunable composition and pore size, and pH-responsive behaviour. To further enhance their performance, bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (BMOFs) have been constructed by incorporating two metal ions with functionalized organic ligands. Leveraging synergistic multimetallic effects and structural tunability, BMOFs exhibit significant potential in biomedical applications, including antibacterial activity, catalysis, and drug delivery. Exploratory applications of BMOFs in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases have already emerged, spanning periodontitis management, caries prevention, oral tissue regeneration, and targeted cancer therapy. Nevertheless, challenges remain in terms of biosafety, long-term stability, in vivo degradation behaviour, and scalable fabrication. This review summarizes the synthesis strategies and functionalization approaches of BMOFs, the selection of metal pairs, and their synergistic mechanisms, with a focus on their applications in oral biofilm infections, inflammatory diseases, oromaxillofacial bone tissue engineering scaffolds, and cancer therapy. Additionally, it discusses current challenges related to biocompatibility, technical limitations, and the clinical translation of these technologies. By correlating the fundamental design principles of BMOFs with the diagnostic and therapeutic demands of oral diseases, this review aims to facilitate translational research and promote the development of BMOFs as innovative and efficient strategies for addressing a range of oral pathologies.
Key Words: Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks, Synthesis method, Antibacterial, Drug delivery system, Tissue regeneration
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
-
•
The synthesis methodologies, functionalization techniques, and mechanistic foundations of BMOFs are reviewed.
-
•
Integrating BMOFs with the specific therapeutic needs of oral diseases demonstrates the material’s innovative interdisciplinary applications.
-
•
The synergistic effects between the dual metal ions in BMOFs are underscored, demonstrating their potential for realising combined therapeutic modalities.
-
•
Extensive coverage of oral clinical applications.
-
•
A forward-looking perspective on clinical translation: addressing bottlenecks and solutions toward personalised precision oral medicine.
Introduction
The oral cavity, characterized by its dynamic, moist, and inflammatory ecosystem rich in microbes, presents a significant global health burden due to the high prevalence of chronic oral diseases.1,2 These pathologies can be broadly categorized as follows: 1) bacterial diseases, primarily initiated by dental plaque biofilms3; 2) inflammatory conditions, closely linked to local immune dysregulation and inflammation-induced oxidative stress4; 3) neoplastic diseases; and 4) hard tissue defects resulting from trauma or tumour resection.5, 6, 7 Autologous bone grafting, while remaining the clinical gold standard for jaw reconstruction, is limited by donor site morbidity and insufficient bone supply.8,9 Conventional therapies often face critical limitations, including incomplete removal of dental plaque biofilms, inadequate control of immune dysregulation and oxidative stress, and restricted tissue regeneration capacity.10 Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop novel biomaterials that integrate antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties with the ability to modulate drug release and the local microenvironment, thereby addressing the complex therapeutic demands of oral diseases.11
Metal-organic frameworks(MOFs), an emerging class of porous crystalline materials, have demonstrated considerable potential in biomedical applications owing to their high specific surface area, tunable pore architectures, and versatile surface chemistry.12,13 However, materials intended for oral applications must contend with a challenging oral environment characterized by moisture, microbial flora, dynamic mechanical forces, and the need to combat pathogenic biofilms while promoting tissue regeneration. Although conventional monometallic MOFs exhibit promising functionalities, their practical utility in complex oral settings is often limited by a lack of functional diversity, insufficient stability, and restricted bioactivity. To address these limitations and enhance material performance for clinical translation, bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (BMOFs) have been developed as an advanced class of MOFs derivatives. BMOFs are constructed by coordinating two distinct metal ions or clusters with organic linkers. In addition to inheriting the structural advantages of conventional MOFs, the bimetallic synergy in BMOFs yields significantly enhanced properties, including increased catalytic active sites and improved structural stability.14 These characteristics render them highly promising for applications in catalysis and antibacterial therapy, offering innovative solutions for managing complex biological challenges in dental medicine.15,16
In recent years, the programmable metal nodes and organic ligands of BMOFs have enabled multifunctional immunomodulatory capabilities beyond those of conventional monometallic MOFs.17 On the one hand, BMOFs can suppress the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, by inhibiting signalling pathways including NF-κB and the PI3K/AKT pathway. On the other hand, they modulate the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) in situ, thereby restoring the redox-inflammatory balance in oral mucosal or periodontal tissues. Through rational synthesis, two distinct metal ions can be incorporated into a highly ordered framework with specific stoichiometric ratios and spatial arrangements. In certain cases, the introduction of a second metal ion can stabilize the oxidation state of the primary metal, enhancing the chemical and structural stability of the material under the complex oral environment – a critical feature for practical applications. Moreover, the pH-responsive degradation behaviour of BMOFs allows for triggered drug release specifically in acidic pathological sites, thereby minimizing nonspecific irritation to healthy oral mucosa.
Additionally, the porous structure of BMOFs enables efficient encapsulation and protection of natural bioactive molecules, overcoming limitations such as poor water solubility, short oral retention time, and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation in saliva. Surface modification with hyaluronic acid or chitosan further confers mucoadhesive and plaque-targeting properties, achieving a synergistic ‘carrier-drug-microenvironment’ therapeutic approach. These multifunctional and coordinated attributes underscore the considerable potential of BMOFs in oral biomedical applications.
This review begins by summarizing the synthetic strategies and functionalization approaches of BMOFs, with a focused discussion on their recent advances in oral antibacterial therapy, periodontitis management, hard tissue regeneration, and oral cancer treatment (Scheme 1). Prospects and challenges related to clinical translation are also examined. By facilitating translational research and promoting BMOFs as innovative and efficient therapeutic strategies for various oral diseases, this review aims to offer valuable insights and future directions for their application in oral medicine.
Scheme 1.
BMOFs: Synthesis and applications in oral medicine.
Synthesis of BMOFs
The spatial distribution of metals in BMOFs can be systematically classified into two primary configurations: solid-solution structures and core–shell structures. The former features an atomic-scale homogeneous distribution of metal species, forming a homogeneous solid solution, forming a homogeneous solid solution, whereas the latter demonstrates spatially partitioned metal arrangements, resulting in a heterogeneous core–shell architecture.18
Synthetic strategies for solid-solution structures include direct synthesis, post-synthetic metal exchange, and template-assisted methods. In contrast, core–shell structures are typically achieved through seed-mediated growth, selective post-synthetic exchange, or one-pot sequential synthesis, allowing precise interfacial control. These approaches enable fine-tuning of metal coordination kinetics and spatial distribution, providing systematic pathways for designing multifunctional BMOFs materials19,20 (Figure 1).
Fig. 1.
Synthetic methods of BMOFs. a, Direct synthesis Copyright©2014, ACS-L.J. Wang.21 b, Post-synthetic metal ion exchange Copyright©2018, ACS-M.S. Denny.22 c, Template-assisted synthesis Copyright©2024, Royal Society Publishing-Y. Yuan.23 d, Seed-mediated growth Copyright©2023, Elsevier-J. Cai.24 e, Selective post-synthetic exchange Copyright©2012, RSC-X. Song.25 f, One-pot stepwise synthesis Copyright©2019, Wiley-B. Li.26
Solid-solution structures are typically synthesized via a straightforward one-pot co-precipitation method, which offers operational simplicity and high yield. However, improper metal ratios or suboptimal pH control may lead to the formation of impurity phases.27 This configuration is well-suited for large-scale synthesis and catalytic/adsorption applications. In contrast, core-shell architectures exhibit enhanced design flexibility, enabling spatially segregated functionalities. When a continuous and uniform shell layer is achieved, a well-defined interface can be obtained.28 Nevertheless, their synthesis generally involves a multi-step process requiring sequential layer-by-layer modification, resulting in greater operational complexity and reduced reproducibility. This structural design is particularly applicable to multifunctional integration and selective catalysis (Table 1).
Table 1.
Synthetic strategies for BMOFs.
| Structure type | Synthesis method | Key features | Typical systems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solid Solution Structure | Direct Synthesis | One-pot reaction of bimetallic precursors and ligands; requires matching of metal ion radii/coordination geometry; control of solvent/pH/temperature | MOF-74 series (Zn/Co, etc.), Zn/Co-ZIF-8 |
| Post-synthetic Metal Exchange | Soaking monometallic MOFs in a second metal salt solution; exchange kinetics governed by electronegativity differences and solvent effects | UiO-66(Zr) with Ti⁴⁺ exchange; Mn-MOF with Fe²⁺/Co²⁺ exchange | |
| Template Method | Use of polymers or sacrificial templates to guide directional metal incorporation; structure regulated via spatial confinement or coordination direction | Zn-polymer template for Zn/Ni-MOF-74; self-templated synthesis of hollow Zn/Ni BMOFs | |
| Core–Shell Structure | Seed-Induced Growth | Epitaxial growth of a second MOF shell on a monometallic MOF seed; requires lattice matching or surfactant regulation | ZIF-8@ZIF-67; UiO-66@ZIF-8 (CTAB-controlled) |
| Selective Post-synthetic Exchange | Selective replacement of surface metal nodes while retaining the core structure; requires control of reaction time/concentration to avoid over-etching | Zn-MOF@Cu-MOF (surface Zn²⁺ → Cu²⁺) | |
| One-Pot Stepwise Assembly | Stepwise assembly of core–shell structure based on differences in metal coordination rates; requires optimization of solvent, temperature, and addition sequence | Co/Zn-ZIF (Co²⁺ preferential nucleation); Cr/V-MIL-53@Cr-MIL-53 (microwave-assisted) |
Bimetallic selection and synergistic mechanism
The precise selection and stoichiometric tuning of metal nodes represent a critical determinant of the physicochemical properties and biological functionalities of BMOFs29,30 (Figure 2, Table 2).
Fig. 2.
Bimetallic systems in BMOFs.
Table 2.
Mechanisms of action and applications of bimetallic systems.
| Bimetallic system | Synergistic mechanism | Biomedical applications | Key effects | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu/Fe | Fe³⁺ catalyses the Fenton reaction, Cu²⁺ enhances electron transfer, synergistically promoting the generation of ROS | Tumour therapy, Antibacterial | Inhibits tumour growth better than cisplatin, effective antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli | 31,32 |
| Zn/Mg | Zn²⁺ broad-spectrum antibacterial, Mg²⁺ activates immunity; Zn²⁺ promotes osteogenesis, Mg²⁺ promotes migration | Bone regeneration, Dental implants | Enhances antibacterial activity, angiogenesis, and bone regeneration; improves hydrophilicity/biocompatibility of PEEK-74 scaffolds | 33,34 |
| Mg/Cu | Mg²⁺ promotes osteogenesis, Cu²⁺ promotes angiogenesis; Cu²⁺ has antibacterial effects, Mg²⁺ has anti-inflammatory effects | Bone defect repair, Implant coatings | Osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling effect, macrophage M2 polarization | 35,36 |
| Zn/Co | Mimics natural enzyme cascade antioxidant, Zn²⁺/Co²⁺ activate the Wnt pathway to promote osteogenesis/chondrogenesis | Periodontitis, Osteoarthritis | Reduces osteoclasts, promotes alveolar bone/subchondral bone regeneration, establishes an anti-inflammatory microenvironment | 37,38 |
| Cu/Zn | Cu²⁺ catalyses •OH generation, Zn²⁺ assists; Cu⁺ in situ drug synthesis + Zn²⁺ activates DNAzyme | Antibacterial, Cancer therapy | Multistage antibacterial, precise cancer treatment | 39,40 |
| Fe/Ni | Synergy between Fe³⁺’s Fenton activity and Ni’s electron regulation enhances peroxidase-like activity and electrochemical signals | Biosensing, Glucose monitoring | Detection limit down to 69 pg/mL, high sensitivity for H₂O₂ detection | 41,42 |
The Cu/Fe BMOFs system
Copper and iron, two transition metal elements abundantly present in biological systems, have been increasingly incorporated into MOFs to construct bimetallic systems due to their crucial roles in redox reactions and the regulation of metalloenzyme activity.43 Structurally, Cu/Fe BMOFs typically feature a synergistic coordination where Fe³⁺ drives Fenton reactivity and Cu²⁺ enhances electron transfer, collectively boosting ROS generation.31
Within acidic tumour microenvironments, these materials efficiently catalyse the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into hydroxyl radicals, exhibiting superior •OH generation capacity and oxidative damage effects compared to monometallic analogues. Beyond the classical Fenton reaction, Cu/Fe BMOFs also deplete glutathione and promote lipid peroxidation, thereby activating ferroptosis and cupric-dependent apoptosis pathways.44,45 In the 4T1 breast cancer mouse model, this material combines favourable biocompatibility with significant tumour-suppressing potential.46
In antimicrobial applications, Cu/Fe BMOFs exhibit potent peroxidase-like activity, generating sufficient ROS even at low H₂O₂ concentrations to disrupt bacterial membranes and biofilms. They demonstrate significantly enhanced efficacy against pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli compared to single-metal frameworks and maintain stable activity in simulated wound environments, offering a promising strategy against antibiotic-resistant infections.32
The Zn/Mg BMOFs system
The Zn/Mg BMOFs system demonstrates significant advantages in biomedical applications through unique synergistic mechanisms.47 Its functional principles are primarily manifested in three aspects. Firstly, Zn2+ exerts broad-spectrum antibacterial effects by disrupting bacterial membrane integrity and inhibiting key metabolic enzymes, while Mg2+ enhances innate immunity through the upregulation of host defense peptides. Their combination leads to a notable improvement in antibacterial efficacy.35, 48, 49 Secondly, in the context of preclinical bone regeneration models, Zn2+ upregulates the expression of ALP and OCN via the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, whereas Mg2+ promotes osteoblast migration through the activation of the TRPM7 channel and optimizes the mineralization microenvironment by modulating local pH.50, 51, 52 Thirdly, Samy Selim et al33 first synthesized a novel Zn-Mg-MOF74, composed of Zn2+, Mg2+, and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid (DHTA). This material exhibits a highly ordered three-dimensional porous structure and favourable biocompatibility, along with remarkable antibacterial activity against various pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. In a further study, Xiao et al34 constructed a Zn-Mg-MOF74 coating on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces, resulting in a composite PEEK-74 scaffold. Their vitro studies findings confirmed that the Zn-Mg-MOF74 coating not only enhanced the antibacterial performance, biocompatibility, and hydrophilicity of the PEEK scaffold but also enabled controlled drug release, effectively promoting angiogenesis and bone tissue regeneration. This system offers a promising approach for repairing bone defects.
The Mg/Cu BMOFs system
The Mg/Cu BMOFs coating enables multifunctional biomedical applications through a unique bimetallic synergistic mechanism, which operates primarily through four aspects: controlled degradation and ion release, osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling, antibacterial and immunomodulatory effects, and structure-function integration.53, 54, 55 By precisely tuning the Cu/Mg ratio, the crystal structure of the MOFs exhibits a gradient evolution, transitioning from a sheet-like to a rod-like morphology with increasing Cu content, enabling the sustained release of Mg2+ and Cu2+ ions.
In terms of osteogenic-angiogenic synergy, Mg2+ enhances ALP activity and upregulates OCN expression in pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells via the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway, while Cu2+ promotes endothelial tubule formation through the HIF-1α/VEGF pathway. The bimetallic synergy results in the concurrent upregulation of Runx2 and COL1α1 gene expression, leading to a pronounced coupled osteogenic and angiogenic effect.36
The antibacterial and immunomodulatory mechanisms involve Cu2+-mediated ROS generation via Fenton-like reactions, which disrupt bacterial membrane integrity, coupled with Mg2+-driven polarization of macrophages toward the M2 phenotype and suppression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α.35 Structurally, the microporous framework formed by organic ligands enables sustained release of growth factors, while the electronic transfer at Mg/Cu heterogeneous interfaces enhances catalytic activity. Surface hydroxylation reduces the contact angle and significantly improves cell adhesion.
Overall, this system achieves a ternary balance among degradation kinetics, bioactivity, and antibacterial performance through precise control of the metal ratio.
The Zn/Co BMOFs system
Zn/Co BMOFs represent a class of multifunctional nanomaterials that combine antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenic properties, demonstrating significant therapeutic potential in the treatment of inflammatory bone-related disorders such as periodontitis and osteoarthritis. Periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease triggered by bacterial infection, is characterized by the pathological accumulation of ROS in local tissues. Excessive ROS not only causes cellular damage but also inhibits osteogenic differentiation and stimulates osteoclast activity, ultimately leading to alveolar bone loss.56 Tang et al37 developed a Zn/Co BMOFs nano-platform that effectively scavenges excess ROS through a cascade of enzyme-mimetic antioxidant activities, thereby protecting hBMSCs and MC3T3-E1 cells from oxidative stress and promoting their differentiation toward an osteogenic phenotype. Animal studies further confirmed that Zn/Co BMOFs not only alleviate local inflammation and reduce osteoclast numbers but also enhance the regeneration of alveolar bone in critical-sized defects.
In another vitro study, Shu et al57 developed a MOF-TCP composite scaffold by functionalizing β-TCP scaffolds with Zn/Co-BMOFs. The resulting scaffold not only exhibits excellent ROS-scavenging capacity and favourable biocompatibility, but also promotes osteogenic differentiation and chondrocyte maturation through the controlled release of active ions such as Zn²⁺ and Co²⁺ during its degradation. More importantly, this scaffold establishes a stable anti-inflammatory immune microenvironment during the repair process of the defect, demonstrating superior tissue integration and long-term therapeutic efficacy. Bai et al38 reported a tumour-targeting nanoreactor (NMC/NTC) based on Zn/Co BMOFs, which can simultaneously trigger multiple synergistic therapeutic mechanisms within the tumour microenvironment in animals models. Specifically, Co²⁺ catalyses the decomposition of H₂O₂ to generate O₂, thereby enhancing the production of singlet oxygen and improving the efficiency of photodynamic therapy. Furthermore, after heat treatment, Co²⁺ imparts magnetic properties to the MOFs, enabling the nanoparticles to accumulate at the tumour site under the guidance of an external magnetic field, thereby enhancing targeting precision. Additionally, Zn²⁺ exhibits inherent immunomodulatory effects and, in combination with metformin and 1-MT, acts synergistically to reverse the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment.
In summary, Zn/Co BMOFs represent a multifunctional and intelligent nanoplatform that integrates drug delivery, catalytic oxygen generation, magnetic targeting, and synergistic therapy into a single system, demonstrating considerable promise for tumor treatment applications.
The Cu/Zn BMOFs system
The Cu/Zn BMOFs system has emerged as a versatile platform with significant potential in both antibacterial and anticancer therapeutics.58,59 To address the limitations of conventional antibacterial chemodynamic therapy (aCDT), such as incomplete sterilization and secondary infections due to the short lifespan of ROS. Peng et al39 developed a domino microreactor (BMOFs-DMR) by integrating Cu/Zn-BMOFs with GOx. This system synergizes aCDT with starvation therapy: GOx catalyses glucose to generate H2O2, while Cu2+ triggers a cascade reaction that produces highly toxic •OH, concurrently depleting bacterial energy stores and GSH. This results in a multistage amplified antibacterial effect. Furthermore, the system promotes epithelialization and neovascularization, significantly accelerating the regeneration of infected skin wounds, thereby representing an ideal antibacterial platform that combines potent bactericidal activity with tissue repair functionality.
In the context of cancer therapy, Cu/Zn BMOFs also demonstrate multimodal, synergistic efficacy.60 Although conventional chemotherapy exhibits potent cytotoxicity, it is often associated with severe side effects, drug resistance, and metastatic risk. To overcome these challenges, Wang et al40 reported a DNAzyme-encapsulated Cu/Zn BMOFs system that combines intracellular in situ drug synthesis with gene therapy for precise cancer cell targeting. After being internalized by cancer cells, the BMOFs degrade under the acidic lysosomal environment, releasing Cu+, Zn2+, and DNAzymes. The Cu+ ions catalyse a bioorthogonal copper-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction to synthesize anticancer drugs intracellularly, while Zn2+ activates DNAzymes to cleave metastasis-related gene substrates, enabling simultaneous gene silencing therapy. Since the anticancer drug is synthesized directly within tumour cells, this approach minimizes damage to normal tissues while effectively inhibiting tumour proliferation and metastasis, offering a promising strategy for precision oncology.
The Fe/Ni BMOFs system
In recent years, Fe/Ni BMOFs have demonstrated significant potential in the fields of biosensing and nanozymes due to their unique structural characteristics and exceptional catalytic performance.41 The core advantage lies in the synergistic effects between the two metal centres: the Fenton reaction activity of Fe and the electron-modulating capability of Ni complement each other, significantly accelerating electron transfer and the generation of •OH radicals, thereby enhancing the peroxidase-like activity of the material.61, 62, 63 This cooperative catalytic mechanism involving electron transfer and radical generation effectively improves the sensitivity and selectivity of Fe/Ni BMOFs in electrochemical signal amplification and target detection.64
In terms of biosensing applications, Fe/Ni BMOFs have been successfully employed in platforms for detecting AFP-L3, a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). By providing active sites and enhancing electron transfer efficiency, in combination with AgNPs as signal tags and an ‘off-on’ switching strategy, a detection limit as low as 69 pg/mL was achieved, showing promise for early diagnosis and prediction of HCC.65 Additionally, Fe/Ni BMOFs exhibit excellent performance in glucose detection through coupling with GOx, enabling ultrasensitive detection of H2O2 and demonstrating their superiority as integrated nanozymes.42
With ongoing advancements in structural modulation strategies – such as optimized synthesis processes, adjustment of metal ratios, and the incorporation of conductive substrates – the stability, conductivity, and catalytic performance of Fe/Ni BMOFs are expected to be further improved.
In summary, Cu/Fe BMOFs generate ROS via the Fenton reaction, demonstrating significant antibacterial and antitumor effects, particularly suited to pathological contexts requiring ROS‑induced cell death, such as cancer therapy. In contrast, Zn/Mg and Zn/Co BMOFs modulate ROS levels through distinct mechanisms: the former shows considerable advantages in bone regeneration, while the latter mitigates excessive ROS to reduce inflammation and promote bone repair. Although each metal system operates through different antioxidant mechanisms, they collectively offer versatile therapeutic options – especially in antibacterial, anti‑inflammatory, osteogenic, and antitumor applications – highlighting substantial potential for clinical use. Therefore, the choice of metal species should be tailored to the specific pathological requirements, thereby advancing the clinical translation of BMOFs in oral medicine.
BMOFs for oral application
Oral biofilm infections
The oral cavity constitutes a complex ecosystem harbouring diverse microbial communities (Figure 3). Dysbiosis within this ecosystem can lead to highly pathogen-specific infectious diseases, among which dental caries represents the most prevalent bacterial infection.66 Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) is regarded as an indispensable pathogen in caries development due to its specific cariogenic traits, including acid production, acid tolerance, and synthesis of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS).67,68 This bacterium utilizes glucosyltransferases to produce EPS scaffolds that promote plaque biofilm formation, while its acidogenic metabolism of dietary carbohydrates lowers the local pH, leading to demineralization of dental hard tissues. Consequently, strategies aimed at inhibiting the viability of S. mutans and disrupting its biofilm formation are crucial for caries prevention and treatment.
Fig. 3.
BMOFs for oral application.
As a representative example, Wang et al69 developed multilayer nanoparticles, designated O₂-Cu/ZIF-8@Ce6/ZIF-8@HA (OCZCH), specifically engineered to exploit the acidic and anaerobic oral microenvironment. In preclinical models, this system effectively eradicated Streptococcus mutans and its biofilms without relying on conventional antibiotics. The structure incorporates ZIF-8 frameworks formed by the coordination of Zn²⁺ with 2-methylimidazole. These coordination bonds are acid-labile, disintegrating at approximately pH 6.5 to enable an acidic-responsive release. Furthermore, the incorporated Cu⁺/Cu²⁺ species exhibit reversible oxygen coordination, which doubles the oxygen adsorption capacity of Cu/ZIF-8. The released Cu²⁺ ions exert auxiliary antibacterial effects by disrupting bacterial membrane potential and interfering with the respiratory chain. The synergistic combination of these mechanisms enables highly efficient eradication of S. mutans biofilms in the hypoxic and acidic oral environment. While direct experimental evidence for the in vivo anticaries efficacy of this BMOFs is currently lacking, both the acid-responsive release mechanism of Zn²⁺ and the antimicrobial action of Cu²⁺ are well-established mechanisms that have been demonstrated in extensive studies on single-metal MOFs structures.70,71 Research on BMOFs that exploits the synergistic effect of these two ions has already been reported in other antimicrobial disease models, beyond dental caries, thus warranting further investigation.72
Beyond antibacterial applications for caries control, BMOFs also show promise in caries risk assessment. For instance, Wu73 and colleagues collected 287 paediatric saliva samples and, utilizing ZIF‑8 modified nanoporous membranes, determined the Michaelis constant (Km) of urease in each sample. This approach provides a novel tool for the early screening of dental caries. In this system, Zn2+ bridged by 2-methylimidazole forms sub-nanometre pores (0.34 nm) that permit selective permeation of OH- ions, thereby amplifying the urease signal. The Au cathode, which also enabled the electrodeposition of ZIF-8, acted synergistically with it to convert urease activity into a readable electrical signal within a 5-minute timeframe. Although Au has been widely incorporated into various bimetallic systems for its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial functions, this nanoporous membrane design provides new insights that broaden its application scope and offer novel perspectives for caries detection.
Peri-implantitis is a microbial infectious disease occurring at implant sites, primarily caused by bacterial contamination and poor oral hygiene. Non-surgical treatment for peri-implant infections mainly involves mechanical debridement and adjuvant therapies, aimed at removing dental plaque. However, mechanical debridement may compromise the surface properties of dental implants, and the use of antibiotics may contribute to bacterial resistance. Therefore, current research focuses on enhancing the antibacterial performance of dental implants through various approaches, including the application of novel biomaterials and surface modification strategies.74
Surface modification strategies have been extensively investigated, with some researchers exploring the application of MOFs within preclinical models. For instance, Choi et al75 coated titanium implants with a near-infrared (NIR)-responsive multifunctional nanocomposite, Au@ZIF-8, to create an antibacterial coating. Specifically, in vitro cellular experiments have demonstrated that ZIF-8, through the release of Zn²⁺, upregulates the expression of genes associated with osteogenesis, resulting in a subsequent promotion of calcium deposition and bone tissue regeneration. Meanwhile, under NIR irradiation, Au nanoparticles generate a photothermal effect that confers bactericidal capability. The combination of these effects enables simultaneous antibacterial activity, photothermal therapy, and osteogenic function.
Similarly, Ag+ exhibits properties analogous to Au. Yang et al76 fabricated a porous ZIF-8@Ag MOF in situ on sulfonated polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Ag+ ions were electrostatically adsorbed within the ZIF-8 pores, synergizing with Zn2+ to enhance antibacterial efficacy.
In a more advanced approach, Li et al77 developed a BMOFs coating with pro-angiogenic capability. This system was fabricated by encapsulating CaO₂@ZIF-67 core-shell particles within a pH-responsive hyaluronic acid-adipic acid dihydrazide (HA-ADH) matrix, thereby integrating antibacterial, osteogenic, and angiogenic functions within a single platform. Under acidic conditions, CaO₂ reacts with water to release H₂O₂, which is subsequently catalysed by Co²⁺ to generate a substantial amount of hydroxyl radicals. These highly reactive •OH species then exert antibacterial effects by attacking bacterial membrane lipids, proteins, and DNA. Under neutral conditions, the Co²⁺ released from ZIF-67 acts as a signal transducer and activator, synergising with Ca²⁺ to promote osteogenesis. Evidence from RT-qPCR analyses indicates that Co²⁺, by stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), significantly upregulates the expression of key pro-angiogenic factors such as FGFR, VEGF, and eNOS. Furthermore, in a rat animal model, the CaO₂@ZIF-67-HA-ADH composite demonstrated the highest bactericidal rate and the most favourable osteogenic efficacy. Both Micro‑CT analysis and histological staining consistently supported these findings. Collectively, these results lay the groundwork for subsequent clinical validation and translation.
Currently, while preliminary studies have demonstrated the potential of BMOFs to inhibit dental caries and modify implant surfaces for antimicrobial purposes under oral microenvironment conditions, the existing evidence remains confined mainly to in vitro cellular experiments and small animal models. Research has yet to advance to extensive animal studies or clinical trials. Key limitations include an unclear translational relationship between clinically relevant doses and exposure durations, a lack of data on long-term efficacy and potential antimicrobial resistance, as well as insufficient systematic evaluation of material stability and activity retention within the complex oral environment, which involves challenges such as salivary clearance and enzymatic degradation.
Oral inflammatory diseases
Oral inflammatory diseases encompass a spectrum of conditions, including periodontitis, oral ulcers, and peri-implantitis. As peri-implantitis has been discussed in the preceding section, it will not be elaborated further here. This section will focus specifically on periodontitis.
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease whose pathogenesis is closely associated with local immune dysregulation and inflammation-induced oxidative stress.78 ROS are a group of highly reactive oxygen-derived chemical entities, including H₂O₂, superoxide anion, singlet oxygen, and hydroxyl radical. They play a crucial role in the host’s innate immune defense.79,80 However, a pathological surge in ROS levels can trigger oxidative stress, leading to damage to cellular lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, thereby exacerbating inflammation and tissue destruction through multiple pathways. In chronic inflammatory oral conditions, dysregulated immune responses result in excessive ROS production, which in turn amplifies inflammatory processes and promotes tissue damage.81
In light of this pathological feature, Tang et al37 developed a Zn/Co BMOFs. Although the Zn²⁺ released from ZIF-8 promotes osteogenesis, it lacks ROS scavenging capability. To address this limitation, cobalt ions were incorporated. Therefore, the incorporation of Co ions introduces a Co²⁺/Co³⁺ redox couple capable of valence transition, which mimics the activities of native antioxidant enzymes, specifically SOD and CAT. This enzyme-mimetic functionality enables effective ROS scavenging, significantly alleviating local periodontal inflammation and inhibiting bone resorption. In vitro experiments demonstrated that this material markedly reduced intracellular ROS levels under H₂O₂ stimulation, thereby promoting the survival of BMSCs and enhancing their osteogenic differentiation. These beneficial effects were further corroborated by in vivo studies using animal models. A rat model of periodontitis was established by ligating an orthodontic wire around the maxillary first molar for 6 weeks. Multiple datasets confirmed that the Zn/Co BMOFs group exhibited significant reversal of alveolar bone resorption and soft tissue destruction. Moreover, at effective treatment doses, no considerable cytotoxicity, haemolysis, organ damage, or metal accumulation was observed, indicating favourable in vitro and in vivo safety profiles.
A similar rationale was applied in the work by Li et al,82 who developed cerium-doped ZIF-8. Through its unique Ce³⁺/Ce⁴⁺ redox cycling, cerium mimics the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase, actively scavenging the excess ROS generated by Zn²⁺ and the inflammatory microenvironment, thereby enhancing biosafety. By doping with cerium, ZIF-8 acquires dual functionalities, including antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects, while demonstrating improved biocompatibility. Both CCK-8 assays and live/dead staining confirmed that at a cerium doping ratio of 10% and a concentration of 30 mg/mL, the material exhibits favourable safety. Notably, future studies should include animal model experiments to corroborate these in vitro findings.
The studies above primarily focus on addressing the inherent limitations of ZIF-8 as a therapeutic agent for periodontitis by incorporating other metal ions to scavenge ROS and mitigate local inflammatory responses, thereby achieving therapeutic effects. However, it is noteworthy that periodontitis is an infectious disease initiated by subgingival plaque biofilms. In the early inflammatory stages, the potent antimicrobial properties of ROS in controlling microbial colonization should not be overlooked. This mechanistic insight has spurred the development of a series of antibacterial materials designed to leverage this endogenous defense mechanism.
Wang et al83 and colleagues successfully synthesized Cu-doped ZIF-8 via a solvothermal method, in which Cu²⁺ partially substitutes Zn²⁺ to form a Cu/Zn BMOFs. Within the MOFs structure, copper is embedded in the ZIF-8 lattice in the form of Cu⁺, forming low-coordination CuN₃ active sites that facilitate O₂ adsorption and electron transfer, thereby activating oxygen to generate ROS. The resulting ROS interacts with bacteria, inducing oxidative stress and membrane damage.
In a different approach, Zhang et al84 constructed a novel nanozyme material, designated Cu(II)@ZIF-8 NPs, via a physical adsorption method. Studies revealed that, compared to conventional ZIF-8 nanomaterials, the incorporation of Cu²⁺ imparts dual enzyme-mimetic activities – specifically, oxidase-like and peroxidase-like functionalities. This enables the material not only to catalyse the depletion of intrinsic bacterial antioxidants but also to catalyse H₂O₂ further, generating highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, thereby conferring potent antibacterial efficacy. Additionally, Cu²⁺ can specifically bind to carboxyl and amino groups in the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls, facilitating the penetration of copper ions into bacteria and resulting in bacterial death. In summary, the two teams adopted distinct strategies for introducing Cu into the MOFs structure to synthesize BMOFs. Owing to the different synthesis approaches, the incorporated copper exists in different valence states, leading to fundamentally divergent antibacterial mechanisms.
In summary, the two research groups adopted distinct strategies to incorporate copper into the MOFs architecture, yielding BMOFs. Owing to differences in synthesis methods, the incorporated copper exists in different valence states, leading to divergent antibacterial mechanisms.
During the pathogenesis and progression of periodontitis, it is particularly crucial to develop an intelligent ROS-regulating system capable of responding to inflammatory conditions at different time points, thereby dynamically balancing antibacterial efficacy and inflammatory control to achieve optimal periodontal tissue regeneration. Currently, no BMOFs targeting this specific requirement have been constructed, highlighting a worthwhile direction for future research.
Furthermore, within the inflammatory microenvironment of periodontitis, excessive accumulation of ROS under oxidative stress can induce mitochondrial damage, further leading to the leakage of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS).85 This burst of mtROS establishes a positive feedback loop that amplifies ROS production and exacerbates mitochondrial injury. Mitochondrial dysfunction, in turn, promotes further inflammation, creating a vicious cycle. In contrast to conventional ROS-scavenging approaches, Zhu et al86 proposed a novel strategy aimed at controlling mitochondrial damage at its source to prevent the amplification of inflammation. They constructed a Mn/Ce BMOFs framework, in which Ce exerts its SOD-mimetic activity, while Mn exists in both tetravalent and divalent states. On one hand, Mn⁴⁺, present in the form of MnO₂, provides CAT-mimetic activity, thereby contributing to ROS scavenging. On the other hand, under the reductive microenvironment within cells, MnO₂ decomposes to release Mn²⁺. These ions act as signalling molecules that rapidly activate SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of FOXO3, promoting its nuclear translocation and upregulating BNIP3 expression. This process initiates mitophagy, which clears damaged mitochondria and terminates the mtROS-driven positive-feedback loop. Ultimately, this restores the redox-osteogenic balance in periodontal ligament cells and inhibits alveolar bone resorption. Therefore, controlling the burst of ROS at its source represents a more effective strategy for managing periodontitis. Subsequent systematic animal experiments were conducted to validate these findings. A periodontitis model was established in male Sprague-Dawley rats, followed by local injection of MnO₂@UiO-66(Ce) at different concentrations 7 days post-modelling. Continuous administration for 3 weeks revealed that a dose of 8 μg per injection site yielded optimal therapeutic efficacy. H&E staining of major organs showed no significant abnormalities. Furthermore, the material was metabolically cleared within 7 days, demonstrating favourable in vivo safety.
During an mtROS burst, not only is mitochondrial damage exacerbated, but pyroptosis – a type of programmed cell death – is also induced, playing a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of periodontitis. Excessive mtROS accumulation promotes the dissociation of TXNIP, which directly binds to the NLRP3 inflammasome and activates Caspase-1. This enzyme cleaves GSDMD, leading to the formation of 20 to 22 nm transmembrane pores, ultimately resulting in cell swelling and rupture. In the periodontitis microenvironment, pyroptosis of cells such as periodontal epithelial cells and osteoblasts further releases IL-1β/IL-18, amplifying both ROS and inflammatory responses, which directly damage periodontal tissues and inhibit bone regeneration.
To address this challenge, Yang et al87 designed an ATP-responsive Mg/Zn-MOF. Within the inflammatory periodontal microenvironment investigated in vitro studies, Zn²⁺ precisely recognizes ATP signals and chelates with phosphate groups/adenine nitrogen atoms of ATP, triggering MOFs degradation and the targeted release of Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ ions to suppress pyroptosis. Specifically, Zn²⁺ inhibits the non-canonical pyroptosis pathway mediated by the Caspase-11/GSDMD axis, thereby reducing cellular sensitivity to LPS. Meanwhile, Mg²⁺ blocks Ca²⁺ influx, preventing GSDMD-NT pore formation and inhibiting the canonical NLRP3/Caspase-1 pyroptosis pathway. Through this dual-ion synergy – Zn²⁺ targeting the non-canonical pathway and Mg²⁺ suppressing the canonical pathway – pyroptosis is comprehensively inhibited. A series of experiments, including Micro-CT, H&E staining, and immunofluorescence, confirmed that this BMOFs significantly ameliorated the destruction of periodontal tissues. Furthermore, its biosafety was comprehensively validated across multiple dimensions, including cytocompatibility, hemocompatibility, and in vivo metabolism and toxicity. On the one hand, Mg/Zn BMOFs at concentrations of 30 μg/mL and below showed no significant toxicity to either fibroblasts or osteoblasts. On the other hand, small animal imaging revealed that the liver primarily metabolises Mg/Zn BMOFs and can be cleared relatively rapidly in vivo – a finding further supported by H&E staining of major organ sections.
Currently, BMOFs have been extensively investigated in the context of periodontitis and related inflammatory conditions. Their proposed therapeutic mechanisms primarily focus on scavenging ROS, modulating mitochondrial function, and inhibiting pyroptosis; however, whether additional therapeutic targets exist requires further exploration. The vast majority of current research remains at the stage of in vitro cellular experiments and in vivo animal studies, for which relatively standardized validation protocols have been established. Nevertheless, translational progress has not yet been reported, and validation using relevant large-animal models is still lacking. Moreover, the unique environment of the periodontal pocket – subject to salivary flow, gingival crevicular fluid turnover, and masticatory mechanical stress – often results in a short drug half-life. Consequently, a key direction for future research is to develop strategies that maintain stable drug concentrations within the periodontal pocket while mitigating the effects of these factors.
In summary, the key experimental limitations are reflected in three main aspects. First, a clear translational relationship has not been established between the microgram-to-milligram dose ranges used in vitro and in animals and the clinically effective local concentration required within the periodontal pocket. Second, observation periods in existing animal studies are generally short, with most not exceeding 4 weeks, resulting in a lack of evaluation regarding long-term tissue integration, stability of bone regeneration, and potential delayed toxicity. Third, systematic studies are still lacking on the biodegradation behaviour, metabolic pathways, and possible chronic immune responses elicited by prolonged material retention within the complex inflammatory microenvironment. These gaps urgently require addressing through standardized large-animal studies to advance the clinical translation of BMOFs.
Oral cancer
Oral cancer encompasses a spectrum of malignancies affecting the oral cavity, including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), melanoma, among others. Current therapeutic strategies primarily involve a multimodal approach that combines surgery with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.88 Of these, oral squamous cell carcinoma represents the predominant subtype, accounting for approximately 90% of all cases. Multiple factors, such as excessive alcohol consumption, tobacco use, viral infections, and genetic predisposition, influence tumour progression. However, the tumour microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis, governing key processes such as tumour progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. The TME is highly complex and characterized by various microenvironmental features, such as oxidative stress, acidosis, hypoxia, and intricate cell-cell interactions. Consequently, combination therapies targeting specific aspects of the TME hold considerable promise for achieving improved therapeutic outcomes.89,90
The team led by Tang et al91 developed an intelligent nanodrug delivery system, termed CZGDH, based on a bimetallic framework that integrates chemotherapy, starvation therapy, and chemodynamic therapy through a cascade response to the TME. This system utilizes Cu/ZIF-8 as the core scaffold, co-loaded with GOx and DOx, and is surface-modified with HA. Leveraging the active targeting capability of HA, CZGDH specifically enters tumour cells. Within the acidic TME, the Zn–N coordination bonds in ZIF-8 – formed via self-assembly of Zn2+ and 2-methylimidazole – are cleaved, leading to framework disintegration and the release of the cargo (DOx, GOx, and Cu2+). DOX directly enters the nucleus to exert conventional chemotherapeutic effects, while GOx catalyses the oxidation of intracellular glucose, depleting energy substrates and generating H2O2 and gluconic acid, thereby inducing starvation therapy. Subsequently, the released Cu2+ first consumes intracellular GSH to form Cu+, which then triggers a Fenton-like reaction with H2O2 produced by GOx, generating highly toxic hydroxyl radicals. This process disrupts the cellular redox balance and induces cell death. Collectively, Zn2+ confers acid-responsive drug release, while Cu2+ depletes GSH, enabling chemodynamic therapy, which synergistically achieves precise drug release and potent antitumor efficacy. In vitro studies confirmed that 0.4 µg/mL represents the cytotoxic threshold. With an average particle size of 164.83 nm, the material meets the size criteria for passive tumour targeting. Subsequent H&E staining of tumour tissues in an established nude mouse model demonstrated that the CZGDH treatment group exhibited significant tumour cell necrosis without apparent systemic toxicity.
Numerous other drug delivery systems have been designed based on Zn2+-mediated acid-responsive mechanisms. For instance, Hao et al92 developed an intelligent delivery platform using ZIF-8 to load 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Sequencing results confirmed that ZIF-8 amplifies the gene-silencing effects of 5-FU, thereby enhancing its antitumor activity against oral squamous cell carcinoma.
The team led by Gu et al93 developed a nanoplatform based on Cu-ZIF-8 loaded with disulfiram (DSF) and modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Although similar to the CZGDH system designed by Tang’s group in its use of a Cu-ZIF-8 framework, the integrated antitumor mechanism involving Cu2+ differs significantly. Under the mildly acidic tumour microenvironment, the ZIF-8 framework disintegrates, releasing Cu2+ and DSF synchronously. These subsequently form a highly toxic copper chelate, Cu(DETC)2, locally within tumour tissues. This chelate induces cancer cell apoptosis primarily by inhibiting proteasome activity, including blockade of the p97-NPL4 pathway. Three-dimensional tumour spheroid assays confirmed that under acidic conditions, at a drug concentration of 15 μg/mL, the intracellular ATP level decreased to 16.3%, accompanied by marked shrinkage of the spheroids. In contrast, the formulation exhibited negligible toxicity at physiological pH.
In addition to the aforementioned Cu-ZIF-8 bimetallic framework, the Mn2+/Zn2+ BMOFs constructed by Zhao et al94 also demonstrates promising antitumor efficacy. Using ZIF-8 as an acid-responsive carrier, the system encapsulates the photosensitizer TCPP-Mn along with GOx, integrating photodynamic therapy (PDT), Zn2+-overloading treatment, and immunotherapy to enhance antitumor outcomes synergistically. In this composite, Mn2+ is derived from TCPP-Mn. Under 660 nm laser irradiation, Mn²⁺ generates singlet O₂, enabling its application in PDT. Furthermore, Mn²⁺ exhibits dual functionality by simultaneously generating oxygen and ROS. It catalyses the conversion of H₂O₂ – produced via glucose oxidation catalysed by GOx – into O₂, thereby alleviating tumour hypoxia and subsequently enhancing the efficacy of PDT. The other metal ion, Zn2+, not only contributes to metal-overloading therapy by disrupting mitochondrial membrane potential and inducing ROS burst-mediated apoptosis, but also promotes immunogenic cell death (ICD), leading to immune activation. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed the translocation of CRT from the intracellular compartment to the cell surface – a hallmark of ICD. This process facilitates dendritic cell phagocytosis and antigen presentation. The experiments above collectively demonstrate the activation of antitumor immune responses and suppression of tumour metastasis. Collectively, the aforementioned experiments demonstrate that this system can activate antitumor immunity and suppress tumour metastasis. The BMOFs, with an average particle size of approximately 100 nm, were administered intravenously at a dose of 5 mg/kg in a mouse subcutaneous tumour model. The group receiving laser irradiation plus the BMOFs treatment showed a significant reduction in tumour volume, with complete tumour regression observed in some mice. H&E staining of major organs and haemolysis assays confirmed the favourable biosafety profile of the formulation.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the preferred technique for visualizing anatomical details of tumours with high spatial resolution. Owing to its paramagnetic properties, Mn2+ serves as a T₁-weighted MRI contrast agent. The team led by Zhang et al95 developed FA-conjugated PEG-modified manganese-doped ZIF-8 nanoparticles loaded with baicalin for MRI-guided targeted therapy in a murine melanoma model. Mn2+, with its high r1 relaxivity, significantly enhanced signal contrast in the tumour region. Moreover, compared to gadolinium-based agents, it offers improved safety by avoiding the risks of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis due to its non-radioactive nature, enabling real-time, non-invasive tumour localization and treatment monitoring. Additionally, the system synergistically promoted ferroptosis, as evidenced by increased lipid peroxidation and downregulation of key ferroptosis inhibitors (GPX4 and FTH1), thereby enhancing baicalin-induced ferroptotic cell death. Similarly, Pan et al96 employed 5-fluorouracil-loaded Mn-ZIF-8 for in vivo MRI and drug delivery in glioma, following a comparable therapeutic rationale.
Regarding currently reported therapeutic BMOFs for oral cancer treatment, most utilize the acid-responsive mechanism of Zn²⁺ to trigger the degradation of ZIF-8, enabling the concurrent release of metal ions and loaded drugs. The incorporation of a second metal ion, such as Cu²⁺ or Mn²⁺, provides additional therapeutic modalities. However, existing research remains predominantly focused on the in vitro cellular level. Although preliminary efficacy has been validated in small animal xenograft models (eg, in mice), support from large-animal experiments and clinical translational studies is still lacking. Furthermore, critical gaps exist, including insufficient follow-up duration and a lack of comprehensive data on dose-response relationships, chronic toxicity, and long-term metal ion accumulation. Addressing these key issues is imperative through the conduct of large‑animal studies and long‑term toxicological investigations compliant with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards, which is essential for enabling the genuine clinical translation of BMOFs.
Bone defects and osteoporosis
The repair of extensive bone defects caused by various factors such as trauma, orthopaedic surgery, tumour resection, and infection remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Over the past few decades, bone tissue engineering has made tremendous progress.97 There has been growing interest in the application of MOFs for bone tissue engineering in recent years. Owing to their high loading capacity and versatility in biomedical applications, BMOFs show great potential for widespread use in this field.
For instance, the research team led by Zou et al98 employed a glutathione-mediated reduction synthesis method to prepare Cu(I)@ZIF-8, which was subsequently blended with PLGA and fabricated into a porous scaffold via 3D printing technology for the repair of infected bone defects. Zn²⁺ serves as an essential cofactor for ALP, directly enhancing its activity and facilitating phosphate deposition. Studies have demonstrated that it also activates osteogenesis-related signalling pathways, such as Runx2 and BMP-2, thereby accelerating callus formation, as evidence by in vitro studies. Within this bimetallic framework, the initially incorporated Cu²⁺ is reduced to Cu⁺ by glutathione. The Cu⁺ species exhibit superior antibacterial efficacy compared to Cu²⁺, largely attributable to their enhanced generation of ROS. Furthermore, Cu⁺ promotes the proliferation and differentiation of MSCs, stimulates ALP activity, and enhances calcium mineralization, collectively contributing to improved osteogenic performance. Subsequently established rat models demonstrated that the PLGA/Cu(I) @ZIF-8 scaffold group effectively suppressed in vivo infection, concurrently reducing both inflammatory responses and bacterial load.
Shu et al99 developed a PCL/PLA/n-HA/Cu@ZIF-8 composite GBR membrane that exhibits integrated antibacterial, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive properties. The ZIF-8 group, in which Zn²⁺ serves as the primary active component, demonstrated significantly higher cellular activity compared to the blank control group. These findings suggest that Zn²⁺ promotes the proliferation of BMSCs, thereby facilitating osteogenesis, although the underlying mechanism warrants further investigation. Additionally, the copper ions loaded on this GBR membrane exist in the divalent state (Cu²⁺). This composite promotes osteogenesis through three distinct mechanisms: firstly, it upregulates the expression of osteogenesis-related genes such as RUNX2 and OCN, facilitating the formation of mineralized nodules; secondly, it interacts with angiogenic factors to enhance endothelial cell chemotaxis and induce microvascular formation, thereby supplying nutrients and oxygen to bone tissue; thirdly, it modulates the immune microenvironment by polarizing macrophages toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and promoting the secretion of pro-osteogenic factors such as BMP-2 and VEGF, which indirectly enhance the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. In a rat periodontitis model, the Cu@ZIF-8 membrane demonstrated superior antibacterial and osteogenic capacity compared to commercially available GBR membranes, while exhibiting better tissue conformity for ease of clinical handling.
A hallmark of osteoporosis (OP) is the attenuated osteogenic differentiation and enhanced adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs, primarily attributable to the accumulation of ROS. In light of this, reducing ROS levels represents a promising therapeutic strategy for OP.100 Mg is known to protect cell membranes from oxidative damage, motivating several studies to engineer Mg-doped ZIF structures to regulate BMSC osteogenic differentiation, thereby indirectly treating osteoporosis. For instance, Cai et al101 and colleagues employed a one-pot method to synthesize Mg-ZIF, which, due to its SOD-like and CAT-like enzymatic activities, effectively scavenges excess ROS in BMSCs. This intervention upregulates key genes involved in lipid metabolism (ELOVL2, FADS1, FADS2), thereby inhibiting adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs and indirectly promoting osteogenic commitment. Animal studies further confirmed that this material significantly enhances bone density, increases the number and thickness of trabeculae, reduces bone resorption, and demonstrates notable anti-osteoporotic effects.
In a separate study, Song et al102 utilized a one-pot aqueous co-precipitation method to load icariin (ICA) onto Mg-ZIF, achieving a system where Mg²⁺, ICA, and Zn²⁺ act synergistically in preclinical models to impart both osteogenic and antibacterial properties. Beyond synergizing with Zn²⁺ to disrupt bacterial membranes and exert antibacterial effects, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirmed that Mg²⁺ stimulates calcium and phosphate deposition, inducing a more abundant and uniform Ca/P mineralized layer in simulated body fluid. However, the study would benefit from further animal experiments to validate these findings.
Recent studies have demonstrated that Co²⁺ can promote chondrogenic differentiation, and the combined effect of Zn²⁺ and Co²⁺ has been validated in multiple studies. For instance, Qin et al103 constructed a biomimetic bilayer hydrogel scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects. First, in accordance with ISO 10993-4 standards, the scaffold demonstrated a haemolysis rate of less than 5%, meeting the requirement and indicating no haemolytic risk. Second, this scaffold enables in situ synthesis of MOFs via 3D printing technology, achieving spatiotemporally controlled release of metal ions, thereby guiding BMSCs to differentiate into both chondrocytes and osteoblasts and ultimately promoting osteochondral tissue regeneration. The upper layer consists of ZIF-67 loaded with Co²⁺ and synthesized in situ with sodium alginate and silk fibroin, while the lower layer is composed of ZIF-8 loaded with Zn²⁺, forming a spatially defined bilayered MOFs structure. By mimicking a hypoxic environment, Co²⁺ stabilizes HIF-1α and activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, upregulating the expression of SOX9 and ACAN to enhance chondrogenesis. In contrast, osteogenic differentiation is facilitated by Zn²⁺ through the activation of the MAPK and AKT signalling pathways, which increases the expression of osteogenic genes, such as RUNX2, Osterix, and OCN. Although this structure does not represent a BMOFs in the classical sense discussed in this review, it corroborates the potential of this bimetallic ion combination. Subsequent experiments in a rabbit knee critical-sized osteochondral defect model confirmed that the bilayer scaffold could simultaneously regenerate hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone within 12 weeks, demonstrating not only safety and efficacy but also superior repair outcomes compared to single-component MOFs scaffolds.
Similarly, Shu et al57 developed a Zn/Co BMOFs through the coordination of Zn²⁺ and Co²⁺ with 2-methylimidazole (2-MIM), which was subsequently coated onto 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds via in situ deposition for treating osteochondral defects caused by osteoarthritis. While no direct evidence indicates osteogenic effects of Co²⁺ alone, it stabilizes HIF-1α to simulate a hypoxic microenvironment and induces the expression of angiogenic factors such as VEGF. When released synergistically with Zn²⁺, it enhances the expression of osteogenic genes, including RUNX2 and OCN. Moreover, the osteogenic mechanism of Zn²⁺ was consistent across both studies. The research group also established a rabbit model of a critical-sized osteochondral defect in the knee. Micro-CT and histological analyses revealed that, compared to pure β-TCP scaffolds and blank controls, the functionalized β-TCP scaffold enabled simultaneous reconstruction of both hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone within 12 weeks, with superior regenerative outcomes.
Additionally, this bimetallic system has demonstrated osteogenic potential in a periodontitis model, where Co²⁺ indirectly promoted bone formation by scavenging ROS, reducing the expression of inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, and inhibiting osteoclast differentiation. These effects synergized with the Zn²⁺-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway to enhance osteogenesis. In summary, Zn²⁺ serves as the primary osteogenic agent, while Co²⁺ plays a supportive role. The osteogenic potential of this bimetallic system is considerable and warrants further investigation to expand its applications in bone regeneration (Figure 4).
Fig. 4.
Applications of BMOFs in oral medicine. a, Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of DOX@Fe/CuTH HaMOF and its role as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) amplifier and Cu/Fe metabolism disruptor in synergistic ferroptosis/apoptosis-based antitumor therapy (Copyright©2022, Wiley-W.J. Xu).46 b, schematic of the synthesis, mechanism, and application of Fe₃Ni-MOF/GOx (Copyright©2022, ACS-Z. Mu).64 c, synthesis of Mg/Cu BMOFs coating and its effects on promoting osteogenic differentiation and enhancing angiogenesis in endothelial cells (Copyright©2024, ACS-K. Chen).35 d, schematic diagram of the Zn/Co BMOFs for periodontitis treatment (Copyright©2025, Wiley-H. Tang).37
Overall, the osteogenic effects exerted by ions within BMOFs structures can be attributed to two primary mechanisms. On one hand, specific ions possess inherent osteogenic and chondrogenic inductive capabilities. On the other hand, they indirectly promote bone formation by modulating inflammation, stimulating angiogenesis, or inhibiting osteoclast activity. Since many ions exhibit one or more of these functions, a key challenge in material design lies in balancing the loading ratios of different metal ions to maximize osteogenic performance while maintaining concentrations below toxic thresholds. Furthermore, achieving sustained release and ensuring that the long‑term degradation kinetics of osteogenic scaffolds align with the natural rhythm of bone regeneration remain significant hurdles for bimetallic systems in bone tissue engineering.
Although the osteogenic efficacy of BMOFs has been validated in rodent models, such as calvarial defect and critical-sized osteochondral defect models, their translation to large-animal studies and clinical application faces multiple challenges. These include scalable and reproducible synthesis, comprehensive long‑term biosafety evaluation, assessment of the maturity and mechanical competence of newly formed bone, and the lack of established regulatory standards.
Future research directions for BMOFs
BMOFs-based sensors for oral applications
BMOFs have demonstrated significant breakthroughs in electrochemical biosensing applications due to their exceptional structural and functional properties.104,105 Their future development holds unique promise in the field of oral medical sensors, where their tunable metal synergistic effects and multifunctional characteristics offer innovative solutions for oral health monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment (Figure 5).
Fig. 5.
Future trends of BMOFs.
In the context of salivary biomarker detection, miniaturized BMOFs-based sensors enable the real-time monitoring of diabetes-related glucose and the stress biomarker cortisol, and can also be applied in early screening for oral cancer.106,107 For periodontal health assessment, BMOFs electrochemical sensors allow highly sensitive detection of periodontitis biomarkers, while simultaneously supporting surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection and photothermal antibacterial activity.
There has been growing research interest in wearable sensors recently, due to their distinct advantages, such as rapid and accurate detection.108 They also demonstrate considerable promise for healthcare applications, particularly in the diagnosis and monitoring of diseases.109 In wearable device applications, flexible BMOFs sensors can be integrated into smart occlusal splint systems for dynamic, multi-parameter oral monitoring, and strain sensors provide real-time feedback for orthodontic force adjustments.110 In theranostic applications, pH-responsive BMOFs enable both the detection of caries-related microorganisms and the on-demand release of therapeutic agents, such as fluoride ions. Additionally, BMOFs-modified implant coatings can simultaneously promote osseointegration and provide an infection warning.
Future development should focus on technical advances such as anti-fouling sensor surfaces, integration with artificial intelligence-assisted analytics, and exploration of seamless integration with denture materials. By aligning closely with clinical needs, BMOFs-based sensors are poised to facilitate practical applications in personalized oral health management.109
BMOFs-mediated targeted therapy for oral cancer
BMOFs primarily accumulate in tumour cells via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. However, their lack of specificity and tendency toward drug leakage during delivery can lead to damage in normal tissues.111,112 Therefore, active targeting can be achieved by functionalizing the surface of BMOFs with ligands that exhibit high affinity for tumour cells, such as FA, HA, and aptamers, all of which have been successfully employed in reported studies. This strategy promotes rapid and substantial accumulation of BMOFs at the tumour site within a short period, allowing effective therapy with reduced drug dosage. Future efforts may focus on developing integrin receptor-targeted BMOFs delivery systems functionalized with targeting moieties, such as RGD peptides or anti-EGFR antibodies, thereby significantly enhancing drug enrichment within tumour tissues.113 A key research direction involves optimizing the coordination microenvironments in bimetallic systems such as Zn/Cu or Zr/Fe to achieve synergistic delivery of chemotherapeutic and targeted agents.
Furthermore, pH/GSH dual-responsive BMOFs – eg, Fe/Mn BMOFs designed for the acidic tumour microenvironment of oral cancer – offer multifunctional therapeutic capabilities. On one hand, they enhance the Fenton reaction to generate ROS efficiently, they deplete GSH specifically within the tumour microenvironment, effectively overcoming antioxidant defense mechanisms. Additionally, such platforms can enable controlled release of immune checkpoint inhibitors, synergizing with chemodynamic therapy with immunotherapy. This multi-mechanistic strategy presents a promising research direction for overcoming treatment resistance in oral cancer.
BMOFs for the restoration of dental hard tissues
The application of BMOFs in the restoration of dental hard tissues primarily relies on their biomimetic mineralization capacity and ability to carry bioactive molecules. However, due to the complexity of the oral environment, conventional BMOFs still face challenges related to mineralization efficiency and stability. To address this, BMOFs can be functionalized with tissue-specific affinity ligands, such as polyaspartic acid or silane coupling agents, to enhance their enrichment at demineralized enamel/dentin interfaces through active targeting. Looking forward, the construction of dual-functional BMOFs delivery systems capable of simultaneous biomimetic mineralization and antibacterial action represents a promising direction. For instance, bimetallic synergistic frameworks, such as Zn/Ca BMOFs or Sr/Mg BMOFs, can be designed to optimize the coordination microenvironment for the sustained release of calcium/phosphate ions and the synergistic delivery of antibacterial metal ions.3,114 Moreover, pH/enzyme dual-responsive BMOFs tailored to the cariogenic microenvironment – such as chlorhexidine-loaded Zr/Ti BMOFs – offer multifaceted reparative functions: they enable acid-triggered rapid release of mineralizing ions to promote remineralization, while also degrading in response to bacterial proteases to release broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, thereby achieving simultaneous regeneration of demineralized tissue and eradication of cariogenic biofilms. Additionally, such platforms can be designed for the controlled release of odontogenic growth factors to activate dental pulp stem cell differentiation and facilitate reparative dentin formation.115 This integrated strategy combining mineralization, antibacterial activity, and regeneration provides a novel approach for addressing complex dental hard tissue defects.
Biosafety, technical bottlenecks, and translation challenges of BMOFs
The translation of emerging experimental materials or methodologies from the laboratory to clinical practice entails a series of challenges – and, consequently, numerous opportunities for future technological advancement.
Biosafety
While BMOFs demonstrate considerable application potential, their diverse chemical compositions and tunable physicochemical properties also imply significant uncertainty regarding their biosafety. Acknowledging the limitations of existing data, this section systematically summarizes preliminary toxicity findings and focuses on the standardized evaluation pathways that must be followed before clinical translation. For instance, research by Wu et al53 indicated that Cu-MOF-74 reduced cell viability to 60% at a concentration of 80 µg mL⁻¹. In contrast, the introduction of Mg²⁺ to form MgCu₃-MOF resulted in cell viability exceeding 90% at the same dose. The safe dose was elevated from 50 µg mL⁻¹ for the monometallic counterpart to over 200 µg mL⁻¹ for the bimetallic system. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analyses revealed that the 24-hour Cu²⁺ release decreased from approximately 6 ppm to below 2 ppm in the MgCu₃-MOF, a level lower than the acute toxicity threshold (2.2 ppm) for osteoblasts.
This phenomenon is also observed in Zn/Co bimetallic systems. When the Co²⁺ ratio is less than 25%, the resulting particles exhibit a size of approximately 300 nm. CCK-8 assays indicated no cytotoxicity toward MC3T3-E1 cells at a dose of 100 µg mL⁻¹. However, a further increase in the Co ratio, even at the same dose, led to pronounced cytotoxicity, highlighting the inherent toxicity of Co ions. The mechanism involves Co²⁺ entering cells via ZIP-8 and DMT1 co-transport channels, leading to significant mitochondrial accumulation. This subsequently triggers oxidative stress and apoptosis, resulting in a sharp decline in cell viability to approximately 65%. Furthermore, variations in the metal ratio also alter particle size, another factor influencing nanomaterial toxicity.37,116 Generally, particles within the size range of 120 to 225 nm exhibit the lowest toxicity, whereas those smaller than 50 nm or larger than 500 nm tend to accumulate in the liver and spleen due to enhanced cellular uptake or physical deposition, respectively.59
Furthermore, during in vivo degradation, metal ions serve as the primary degradation by-products. Key factors such as ion concentration, ion species, and release kinetics collectively influence their biosafety profile117 (Table 3).
Table 3.
Degradation of BMOFs.
| Material composition | Degradation conditions | Degradation time | Degradation products | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeCuMOF@PEG | pH 5.5 | 24 h | Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺, Cu²⁺, terephthalic acid derivatives, and low-molecular-weight PEG, are processed through endogenous iron/copper metabolic pathways or eliminated via renal/biliary excretion, with no cumulative toxicity observed | 44 |
| DOX@Fe/CuTH | pH 5.5 and 10 mM GSH | within 24 h |
free DOX, Cu⁺/Fe²⁺, thiol fragments, and GSSG, all of which can be eliminated via renal/biliary excretion within 48 h, with no risk of long-term accumulation | 46 |
| DEX@ZnMgMOF74 | pH 7.4 | Within 7 d | Mg², Zn²⁺, DHTA, DEX; organ accumulation assays were not performed | 34 |
| Poloxamer Nanoplatform containing Zn/Co-MOF | pH 7.4 | within 72 h |
Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, 2-methylimidazole; no signs of cumulative toxicity within 14 d | 37 |
| Zn/Co-MOF@β-TCP | pH 7.4 | 12 wk | Ca²⁺, PO₄³⁻, Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, 2-methylimidazole; no inflammation or metal accumulation, meeting the recovery cycle for osteochondral defects | 57 |
| PDA/GOD@Zn/Co-MOF | pH 5.0 | within 24 h |
Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, 2-methylimidazole, PDA, GOD; no signs of cumulative toxicity within 48 h | 38 |
| Cu/Zn-ZIF @GOx | pH ≤ 5.6 | 24 h | Zn²⁺, Cu²⁺, 2-methylimidazole, Gox; showing no detectable organ accumulation within 7 d | 39 |
| ICG@Cu/Zn-MOF @MnO₂ | pH 5.5,GSH,H₂O₂ | within 24 h |
Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, ICG; showing no detectable organ ac cumulation within 7 d | 60 |
| DNAzyme@ Cu/ZIF-8 |
pH 5.5 | 24 h | Zn²⁺, Cu²⁺, 2-methylimidazole, the active DNAzyme, and an anticancer resveratrol derivative; showing no detectable organ accumulation within 7 d | 40 |
Compared to monometallic MOFs, BMOFs exhibit more tunable degradation rates. For instance, Shane et al47 constructed Mg/Zn bimetallic organic frameworks with varying metal ratios, loaded with curcumin, and evaluated their release profiles in PBS. The study revealed that a higher proportion of Mg accelerated the rate of curcumin release. Structurally, the Mg/Zn MOFs demonstrated greater stability in PBS than pure Mg‑MOF‑74, while degrading slightly faster than pure Zn‑MOF‑74, thus exhibiting degradation kinetics intermediate between the two single‑metal counterparts. This approach enables the modulation of degradation behavior without altering the fundamental framework or synthesis protocol, thereby mitigating potential adverse effects from abrupt ion release.
Separately, Zhong’s44 team developed polyethylene glycol‑modified Fe-Cu BMOFs nanospheres with a controlled particle size of approximately 130 nm. MTT assays indicated that after 24 h of treatment at 200 µg/mL, cell viability remained high across different cell lines: 91.2% for HepG2 hepatoma cells, 92.4% for L929 normal fibroblasts, and 87.8% for mouse H22 hepatoma cells. These findings underscore that the safe concentration range of such nanospheres may vary depending on the cell type.
Compared to their monometallic counterparts, bimetallic MOFs exhibit significantly enhanced biosafety by incorporating biocompatible inert metals such as Fe³⁺ and Zr⁴⁺ to dilute toxic active centres like Cu²⁺ and Mn²⁺. This metal substitution strategy effectively mitigates safety concerns associated with toxic ion release while preserving the structural integrity of the framework and maintaining therapeutic efficacy.118
In a study by Tian et al,31 MTT assays and live/dead fluorescence imaging showed that Fe‑Cu bimetallic MOFs at 50 μg/mL led to higher cell viability than monometallic MOFs. The incorporation of Fe reduces the local density of Cu²⁺, which not only decreases Cu²⁺ release but also preserves the electron transfer efficiency at the peroxidase‑like active sites. This results in reduced cytotoxicity and ensures an effective balance between toxicity and functionality.
From the perspective of animal safety, the bimetallic strategy can synergistically accelerate degradation and reduce the duration of in vivo accumulation. Experimental results showed that after a single intravenous injection of CuBTC at 20 mg·kg⁻¹, hepatic copper accumulation in mice reached 25 µg·g⁻¹ at 72 h, accompanied by a two-fold increase in ALT levels. In contrast, when a Cu/Zn BMOFs with an equimolar ratio of Zn doping was administered at the same dose, hepatic copper accumulation decreased to 15 µg·g⁻¹, ALT levels returned to normal, and hepatic TNF-α expression was downregulated by 58%.54,36
In summary, BMOFs leverage metallic synergy to overcome the limitations of monometallic MOFs in degradation kinetics and toxicity. On the one hand, by leveraging differences in chemical stability between metal nodes, precise tunability of material degradation rates in physiological environments is achieved, thereby avoiding acute toxicity risks from the burst release of metal ions. On the other hand, the introduction of highly biocompatible inert metals as structural supports can effectively ‘dilute’ highly catalytically active but potentially toxic metal centres. This strategy widens the material’s safety window without compromising the framework’s integrity or therapeutic efficacy. Such an optimal balance between functionality and biosafety underscores the superior biocompatibility of BMOFs, thereby facilitating their clinical translation.
For the successful clinical translation of BMOFs, it is imperative to establish a comprehensive, systematic evaluation framework. This entails conducting thorough biological testing of BMOFs in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 10993-4) series of standards for the biological evaluation of medical devices. Critical assessments should include in vitro cytotoxicity, systemic toxicity analysis, and genotoxicity screening. Building on this foundation, preclinical research on BMOFs must be further refined, with particular attention to the long-term accumulation of released metal ions and the metabolic products of organic ligands, alongside a systematic evaluation of their safety pharmacology.
The transition from fundamental BMOFs research to first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials requires adherence to a stepwise translational pathway. This pathway commences with the stringent standardized preparation and multidimensional characterization of BMOFs, addressing key issues such as nanoscale particle size distribution, crystal structure stability, and batch-to-batch consistency. Subsequently, in vitro cellular experiments are essential for evaluating the biocompatibility of BMOFs, with a focus on discerning the differential impacts of various metal node and organic ligand combinations on cellular behaviour. At the mechanistic investigation stage, an in-depth exploration of potential specific toxicity pathways triggered by BMOFs is necessary, particularly concerning the disruption of intracellular redox homeostasis by metal ions and organic fragments generated during degradation.
Following these studies, preliminary animal experiments should be conducted in small-animal models to verify good laboratory practice (GLP) chronic toxicity before advancing to large-animal models or implantation studies. Ultimately, an integrated preclinical study protocol for BMOFs must be implemented under quality management-compliant conditions. This protocol must fully consider the unique drug loading and release properties conferred by the nanoporous structure of BMOFs, as well as their structural stability and degradation kinetics across different physiological environments. Completion of this preclinical testing pathway will provide the scientific foundation necessary for dose design and safety monitoring in FIH trials, thereby propelling the substantive translation of these novel materials from laboratory research to clinical application.
Technical bottlenecks
The clinical translation of BMOFs is confronted with a series of interrelated technical and regulatory hurdles. A primary manufacturing bottleneck lies in achieving reproducibility and batch-to-batch consistency during scale-up. Significant variations between batches – in crystal morphology, particle size distribution, specific surface area, pore architecture, and metal-ligand stoichiometry – can directly undermine drug loading efficiency, release kinetics, and the predictability of final biological effects.119, 120, 121 From an economic perspective, the reliance on high-purity metal salts, functionalized organic ligands, and often meticulously controlled synthesis conditions results in production costs substantially exceeding those of conventional dental materials. Consequently, developing green, efficient, and low-cost synthetic strategies has emerged as a crucial research direction to enhance economic feasibility.
In the context of scale-up production, achieving batch-to-batch reproducibility for BMOFs hinges critically on factors such as material cost and purity. These factors are decisive not only for the structural integrity, drug loading, release profile, and subsequent biological performance of the material but also for the economic feasibility of its large-scale manufacturing.122 Among them, the metal-ion ratio is a key determinant of the framework’s stoichiometric stability. Even minor deviations in the metal-to-ligand ratio can alter the coordination geometry at the nodes, leading to reduced crystalline phase purity or crystal phase transformation.123 Specific surface area and porosity are key metrics for evaluating the structural openness and guest molecule accessibility of MOFs. Their values are highly susceptible to variations in multiple synthesis conditions, including reaction temperature, solvent system, moisture content, and precursor purity.124 Slight fluctuations in any of these parameters may result in partial pore blockage, accumulation of crystal defects, and ultimately, significant performance disparities across different batches.125 Furthermore, during scale-up, the cost of high-purity metal salts and functionalized organic linkers substantially exceeds that of traditional dental biomaterials. This material cost factor may significantly impact the feasibility of large-scale production.
On the other hand, BMOFs as drug delivery systems must typically undergo clinically acceptable sterilization procedures, the impact of which on material structural stability and performance cannot be overlooked. Autoclaving (high-temperature, high-pressure sterilization) may lead to the cleavage or reorganization of metal–ligand bonds, potentially causing framework collapse, reduced pore volume, or a significant decrease in specific surface area.126 While irradiation sterilization avoids high temperatures, it can induce free-radical reactions in ligands, alter the oxidation states of metal nodes, or even trigger decoordination, resulting in lattice distortion or local disorder in the material.127 Although filtration sterilization is relatively mild, it may selectively remove smaller nanoparticles from BMOFs formulations, thereby altering the particle size distribution.128 Furthermore, most sterilization protocols may modify the material’s surface chemistry, for example, by chemically altering surface carboxyl, hydroxyl, or metal groups. These changes can indirectly affect the binding capacity for drug molecules, drug loading stability, and release kinetics.129,130
Before clinical translation, the intended use pathway for BMOFs must be clearly defined, as this determines the specific regulatory requirements. If BMOFs are employed as medical devices (eg, antibacterial coatings or scaffold materials), they must comply with standards such as ISO 10993 for biocompatibility testing, and provide sterilization validation and mechanical performance data. If BMOFs function as drugs by loading and releasing bioactive substances, they are likely to be regulated as pharmaceutical products. This would necessitate the submission of GLP toxicology data (including 28-day repeated dose, genotoxicity, and immunotoxicity studies), PK/PD models, CMC (Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls) documentation, and Phase I/II clinical trial data. In cases where BMOFs serve as combination products, integrating both drug-delivery and structural-support functions, data for both the device and the drug components must be submitted concurrently for review by the FDA’s Office of Combination Products (OCP).
From a translational science perspective, the biological evaluation and regulatory pathway for BMOFs remain inadequately defined. Primarily, their regulatory classification must be determined based on the specific application scenario and mechanism of action, potentially categorizing them as medical devices, pharmaceuticals, or combination products. This classification will directly dictate the scope of required preclinical and clinical investigations. Consequently, a corresponding regulatory testing framework must be systematically established. Beyond standard biocompatibility assessments, particular attention must be paid to key safety endpoints, including the impact of sterilization processes on material structural stability and functionality, as well as long-term chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, and immunogenicity.
Therefore, to advance the clinical translation of BMOFs, it is imperative to establish a comprehensive framework encompassing controllable material fabrication, acceptable material costs, assessment of sterilization compatibility, regulatory science classification, and systematic toxicological evaluation. This framework not only provides an essential pathway to address current technical bottlenecks but also forms the scientific foundation for meeting future regulatory requirements and ensuring the safety and efficacy of clinical applications.
Challenges in clinical translation
The clinical translation of BMOFs faces three major challenges. First, batch-to-batch variations during large-scale synthesis – particularly in terms of crystal morphology, particle size distribution, and porosity – can directly impact drug loading efficiency and release kinetics.106,131,132 Second, the production cost of BMOFs remains substantially higher than that of conventional dental materials, largely due to the requirement for high-purity metal salts and functionalized organic ligands. Developing green, efficient, and low-cost synthesis strategies is therefore essential to enhance their economic feasibility.133,134 Finally, there is a lack of consistent standards for the biological evaluation of BMOFs. Currently, there is a notable scarcity of long-term follow-up data to evaluate potential risks of systemic immunomodulatory effects. Thus, establishing a comprehensive and unified assessment framework is imperative for future clinical translation.135,136
Conclusion
In summary, this review has comprehensively discussed the synthesis methods of BMOFs, strategies for bimetallic selection, and their clinical applications in dentistry. As an emerging class of nanomaterials, BMOFs demonstrate remarkable potential in areas such as oral tissue regeneration, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapies, owing to their highly tailorable structures, synergistic metal-ion effects, multifunctional integration capacity, and responsive release properties within the oral microenvironment. However, it should be noted that research on BMOFs remains largely confined to the laboratory stage, with most studies conducted in animal models, such as mice. Clinical trials have not yet been initiated. Significant research gaps still exist regarding the clinical application and translation of these findings. Future studies should prioritize systematic safety evaluations to facilitate breakthroughs in clinical translation, thereby further unlocking the considerable potential of BMOFs in modern dentistry.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yuhan Yang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. Qi Zhao: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Zhanhua Cao: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Lingao Zhu: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Bowei Wang: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Zhihui Liu: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation, Conceptualization.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82370934) and Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (grant no. YDZJ202401160ZYTS).
Contributor Information
Bowei Wang, Email: wangbw@jlu.edu.cn.
Zhihui Liu, Email: liu_zh@jlu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Geng M., Li M., Li Y., et al. A universal oral microbiome-based signature for periodontitis. Imeta. 2024;3(4):e212. doi: 10.1002/imt2.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Y., Wu Y., Song J. Global and regional burden of periodontal disease in adults (1990-2021) Int Dent J. 2025;75(6) doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.103883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li S., Cao H., Zhang Y., et al. Periodontal disease and chronic kidney disease: mechanistic insights and novel therapeutic perspectives. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1611097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li T., Shu M., Zhu C., et al. Triple-combination therapy with a multifunctional yolk-shell nanozyme Au@CeO(2) loaded with dimethyl fumarate for periodontitis. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2025;12(7) doi: 10.1002/advs.202413891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li W., Zhu X., Wang X., et al. Segmentation and accurate identification of large carious lesions on high quality x-ray images based on Attentional U-Net model. A proof of concept study. J Appl Phys. 2022;132(3) [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hajishengallis G. Interconnection of periodontal disease and comorbidities: evidence, mechanisms, and implications. Periodontol 2000. 2022;89(1):9–18. doi: 10.1111/prd.12430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li S., Cui Y., Liu H., et al. Application of bioactive metal ions in the treatment of bone defects. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10(45):9369–9388. doi: 10.1039/d2tb01684b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liang Q., Song X., She S., Wang Z., Wang C., Jiang D. Development of dual delivery antituberculotic system containing rifapentine microspheres and adipose stem cells seeded in hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:373–384. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S190696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang C., Wang F., Ke J., et al. Exploring the shared genetic characteristics of peri-implantitis and osteoporosis: a transcriptomic analysis perspective. Int Dent J. 2025;75(5) doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.103865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hu Y., Xu W., Sun L., et al. Multifunctional injectable hydrogel incorporating EGCG-Cu complexes for synergistic antibacterial, immunomodulatory, and osteogenic therapy in periodontitis. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang L., Huang X.H., Yang X., et al. Novel nano-drug delivery system for natural products and their application. Pharmacol Res. 2024;201 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jiang S., Lv T., Peng Y., Pang H. MOFs containing solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10(10) doi: 10.1002/advs.202206887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li W., Liang T., Lin Y., Wu W., Li S. In silico screening of metal-organic frameworks for formaldehyde capture with and without humidity by molecular simulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22) doi: 10.3390/ijms232213672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu X., Su S., Yin H., et al. Precise anchoring of Fe sites by regulating crystallinity of novel binuclear Ni-MOF for revealing mechanism of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Small. 2024;20(10) doi: 10.1002/smll.202306085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen K., Zhou A., Zhou X., He J., Xu Y., Ning X. Cellular Trojan Horse initiates bimetallic Fe-Cu MOF-mediated synergistic cuproptosis and ferroptosis against malignancies. Sci Adv. 2024;10(15):eadk3201. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhao Z., Zhu M., Qu M., et al. Relay electrocatalysis with bimetallic sites for highly efficient oxidation in multiple cascade reaction. Chem Eng J. 2024;484 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhao H., Serre C., Steunou N. Metal-organic frameworks for the therapy of inflammatory diseases. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(26) doi: 10.1002/adhm.202404334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Foo M.L., Matsuda R., Kitagawa S. Functional hybrid porous coordination polymers. Chem Mater. 2013;26(1):310–322. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tran T.V., Dang H.H., Nguyen H., Nguyen N.T.T., Nguyen D.H., Nguyen T.T.T. Synthesis methods, structure, and recent trends of ZIF-8-based materials in the biomedical field. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7(13):3941–3960. doi: 10.1039/d4na01015a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen L., Wang H.F., Li C., Xu Q. Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives. Chem Sci. 2020;11(21):5369–5403. doi: 10.1039/d0sc01432j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang L.J., Deng H., Furukawa H., et al. Synthesis and characterization of metal-organic framework-74 containing 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 different metals. Inorg Chem. 2014;53(12):5881–5883. doi: 10.1021/ic500434a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Denny M.S., Jr., Parent L.R., Patterson J.P., et al. Transmission electron microscopy reveals deposition of metal oxide coatings onto metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(4):1348–1357. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yuan Y., Li S., Zhu L. The use of bimetallic metal–organic frameworks as restoration materials for pollutants removal from water environment. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2024;11(7) doi: 10.1098/rsos.240380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cai J., Liu C., Tao S., et al. MOFs-derived advanced heterostructure electrodes for energy storage. Coordin Chem Rev. 2023;479:214985. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Song X., Jeong S., Kim D., Lah M.S. Transmetalations in two metal–organic frameworks with different framework flexibilities: Kinetics and core–shell heterostructure. CrystEngComm. 2012;14(18):5753–5756. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li B., Ma J.G., Cheng P. Integration of metal nanoparticles into metal-organic frameworks for composite catalysts: design and synthetic strategy. Small. 2019;15(32) doi: 10.1002/smll.201804849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang H., Yang L., Yang Y., Jia L. Multifunctional bimetallic MOF engineering: Innovative synthesis and versatile applications in adsorption, catalysis, sensing, and energy. Coordin Chem Rev. 2026;547 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu M.X., Wang Y., Zhou G., Liu X. Core-shell MOFs@MOFs: diverse designability and enhanced selectivity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(49):54285–54305. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c16428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yilmaz G., Peh S.B., Zhao D., Ho G.W. Atomic- and molecular-level design of functional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and derivatives for energy and environmental applications. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2019;6(21) doi: 10.1002/advs.201901129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li D., Ding Y., Wang X., Xu W. On-surface fabrication of bimetallic metal-organic frameworks through the synergy and competition among noncovalent interactions. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021;12(22):5228–5232. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tian M., Zhou L., Fan C., et al. Bimetal-organic framework/GOx-based hydrogel dressings with antibacterial and inflammatory modulation for wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2023;158:252–265. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sun S., Liu X., Meng X., Yang Z., Zhang X., Dong H. Bimetallic metal-organic framework microneedle array for wound healing through targeted reactive oxygen species generation and electron transfer disruption. ACS Nano. 2025;19(15):15109–15119. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c02923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Selim S., Almuhayawi M.S., Saddiq A.A., et al. Synthesis of novel MgO-ZnO nanocomposite using Pluchea indica leaf extract and study of their biological activities. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2025;12(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40643-025-00848-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xiao T., Fan L., Liu R., et al. Fabrication of dexamethasone-loaded dual-metal-organic frameworks on polyetheretherketone implants with bacteriostasis and angiogenesis properties for promoting bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(43):50836–50850. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c18088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen K., Wang Y., Tang H., et al. Fabrication of a nanoscale magnesium/copper metal-organic framework on Zn-based guided bone generation membranes for enhancing osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and bacteriostasis properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(5):5648–5665. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c16970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xiang K., Wu H., Liu Y., et al. MOF-derived bimetallic nanozyme to catalyze ROS scavenging for protection of myocardial injury. Theranostics. 2023;13(8):2721–2733. doi: 10.7150/thno.83543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tang H., Yu Y., Zhan X., et al. Zinc-cobalt bimetallic organic frameworks with antioxidative and osteogenic activities for periodontitis treatment. Small. 2025;21(25) doi: 10.1002/smll.202412065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai Z.H., Guo L.S., Huang J.F., et al. Biomimetic metal organic frameworks mediated by metformin and 1-MT for enhancing the synergistic treatment of photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy and immunotherapy. Chem Eng J. 2024;479 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peng L., Yang X., Wang S., et al. Bimetal metal-organic framework domino micro-reactor for synergistic antibacterial starvation/chemodynamic therapy and robust wound healing. Nanoscale. 2022;14(5):2052–2064. doi: 10.1039/d1nr07611f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Z., Niu J., Zhao C., Wang X., Ren J., Qu X. A bimetallic metal-organic framework encapsulated with DNAzyme for intracellular drug synthesis and self-sufficient gene therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(22):12431–12437. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ebadi S., Ghanbari K., Zahedi-Tabrizi M. Development of an electrochemical sensor based on Ni-Bio-MOF and a molecular imprinted polymer for determination of diclofenac: electrochemical and DFT investigations. RSC Adv. 2025;15(21):16983–16998. doi: 10.1039/d5ra00194c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang J., Bao M., Wei T., Wang Z., Dai Z. Bimetallic metal-organic framework for enzyme immobilization by biomimetic mineralization: constructing a mimic enzyme and simultaneously immobilizing natural enzymes. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1098:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li J.X., Wang J.L., Chai T.Q., Yang F.Q. One-pot synthesized copper-imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde complex material with oxidase-like activity for the colorimetric detection of glutathione and ascorbic acid. Heliyon. 2023;9(11) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhu X., He C., Tan L., et al. An Fe-Cu bimetallic organic framework as a microwave sensitizer for treating tumors using combined microwave thermotherapy and chemodynamic therapy. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(7) doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2024.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Luo X., Sun H.Y., Lu S.Y., et al. Fe-doped Cu-based bimetallic metal-organic frameworks as nanoscale microwave sensitizers for enhancing microwave thermal and dynamic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanoscale. 2024;16(23):11069–11080. doi: 10.1039/d4nr00654b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xu W.J., Qian J.M., Hou G.H., et al. A hollow amorphous bimetal organic framework for synergistic cuproptosis/ferroptosis/apoptosis anticancer therapy via disrupting intracellular redox homeostasis and copper/iron metabolisms. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(40) [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lawson S., Siemers A., Kostlenick J., et al. Mixing Mg-MOF-74 with Zn-MOF-74: a facile pathway of controlling the pharmacokinetic release rate of curcumin. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4(9):6874–6880. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sheng K., Zheng X., Ren J., et al. Cotton gauze fabricated with hydro-stable Zn-MOF enables hemostasis acceleration, antibacterial activity, and wound regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;316(Pt 2) doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Luo Z., Ma J., Wang Y., et al. Application of Mg-MOF-loaded gelatin microspheres with osteogenic, angiogenic, and ROS scavenging capabilities in bone defect repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;280(Pt 2) doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhao Q.M., Xu G.H., Hu A.N., et al. A Mg/Zn-co-doped composite coating on a titanium surface enhances osteogenic activity through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;515 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Molenda M., Kolmas J. The role of zinc in bone tissue health and regeneration: a review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023;201(12):5640–5651. doi: 10.1007/s12011-023-03631-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Qiao W., Wong K.H.M., Shen J., et al. TRPM7 kinase-mediated immunomodulation in macrophage plays a central role in magnesium ion-induced bone regeneration. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2885. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu J., Tan Y., Shen E., et al. Highly water-stable bimetallic organic framework MgCu-MOF74 for inhibiting bacterial infection and promoting bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(6):065026. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aca24c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cun J.E., Fan X., Pan Q., et al. Copper-based metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;305 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yu Y., Jin G., Xue Y., Wang D., Liu X., Sun J. Multifunctions of dual Zn/Mg ion co-implanted titanium on osteogenesis, angiogenesis and bacteria inhibition for dental implants. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:590–603. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhao M., Xie Y., Gao W., Li C., Ye Q., Li Y. Diabetes mellitus promotes susceptibility to periodontitis-novel insight into the molecular mechanisms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1192625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shu C., Qin C., Chen L., et al. Metal-organic framework functionalized bioceramic scaffolds with antioxidative activity for enhanced osteochondral regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10(13) doi: 10.1002/advs.202206875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ahmad I., Bishoyi A.K., Altalbawy F.M.A., et al. Synthesis, identification and introduction of novel Cu/Zn-BMOF as a bioactive bi-metal organic framework. J Inorg Organomet P. 2025;35(5):3530–3544. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang J., Dai D., Zhang X., Teng L., Ma L., Yang Y.W. Multifunctional metal-organic framework (MOF)-based nanoplatforms for cancer therapy: from single to combination therapy. Theranostics. 2023;13(1):295–323. doi: 10.7150/thno.80687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cheng Y., Wen C., Sun Y.Q., Yu H., Yin X.B. Mixed-metal MOF-derived hollow porous nanocomposite for trimodality imaging guided reactive oxygen species-augmented synergistic therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(37) [Google Scholar]
- 61.Asiwal E.P., Shelar D.S., Gujja C.S., Manjare S.T., Pawar S.D. A Ni-MOF based luminescent sensor for selective and rapid sensing of Fe(ii) and Fe(iii) ions. New J Chem. 2022;46(26):12679–12685. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang Y., Lv S., Jiang L., et al. Room-temperature mixed-potential type ppb-level NO sensors based on K(2)Fe(4)O(7) electrolyte and Ni/Fe-MOF sensing electrodes. ACS Sens. 2021;6(12):4435–4442. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.1c01838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang Z., Lu H., Dong H., et al. Fe(3)O(4)/Ni nanoparticles anchored nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from core-shell MOF for simultaneous electrochemical detection of dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. Talanta. 2025;286 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mu Z., Wu S., Guo J.J., Zhao M., Wang Y. Dual mechanism enhanced peroxidase-like activity of iron-nickel bimetal-organic framework nanozyme and its application for biosensing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2022;10(9):2984–2993. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tu W., Liu H., Wang J., Wang Y., Wang Z., Dai Z. Using signal off-to-on strategy for designing precise and ultrasensitive biosensor towards hepatocellular carcinoma through protein variant detection based on biocompatible bimetallic MOF. Biosens Bioelectron. 2025;280 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rudin L., Kneubühler J., Dubey B.N., Ahmad S., Bornstein M.M., Shyp V. Inhibitory effect of plant flavonoid cyanidin on oral microbial biofilm. Microbiol Spectr. 2025;13(6) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02848-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Moon J., Seo K., Kwon J.S. Novel two-stage expansion of Streptococcus mutans biofilm supports EPS-targeted prevention strategies for early childhood caries. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025;11(1):65. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00699-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fang Y., Chen X., Chu C.H., Yu O.Y., He J., Li M. Roles of Streptococcus mutans in human health: beyond dental caries. Front Microbiol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1503657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang R., Pan Q., Li F., et al. Oxygen-carrying acid-responsive Cu/ZIF-8 for photodynamic antibacterial therapy against cariogenic Streptococcus mutans infection. Dalton Trans. 2023;52(44):16189–16196. doi: 10.1039/d3dt02816j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.He C., Liu C., Li M., et al. 3D hierarchical Cu-MOF nanosheets-based antibacterial mesh. Chem Eng J. 2022;446 [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xiang G., Wang B., Zhang W., et al. A Zn-MOF-GOx-based cascade nanoreactor promotes diabetic infected wound healing by NO release and microenvironment regulation. Acta Biomater. 2024;182:245–259. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhong Y., Zheng X.T., Li Q.L., Loh X.J., Su X., Zhao S. Antibody conjugated Au/Ir@Cu/Zn-MOF probe for bacterial lateral flow immunoassay and precise synergistic antibacterial treatment. Biosens Bioelectron. 2023;224 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.115033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhou B.Y., Shi X.Y., Luo Z.Y., et al. Predictive analysis of dental caries risk via rapid urease activity evaluation in saliva using a ZIF-8 nanoporous membrane. ACS Sens. 2025;10(6):3888–3897. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.4c03091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yu Y.M., Lu Y.P., Zhang T., Zheng Y.F., Liu Y.S., Xia D.D. Biomaterials science and surface engineering strategies for dental peri-implantitis management. Mil Med Res. 2024;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00532-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Choi C.E., Shamiya Y., Luo W., Paul A. NIR-responsive ZIF-8 metal-organic framework nanohybrids with photothermal, antimicrobial, and osteoinductive properties to prevent implant infection. Macromol Biosci. 2025;25(5) doi: 10.1002/mabi.202400594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yang X., Chai H., Guo L., et al. Corrigendum to ‘In situ preparation of porous metal-organic frameworks ZIF-8@Ag on poly-ether-ether-ketone with synergistic antibacterial activity’ [Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 205 (2021) 111920] Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;209(Pt 2) doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li X., Xu M., Geng Z., et al. Novel pH-responsive CaO(2)@ZIF-67-HA-ADH coating that efficiently enhances the antimicrobial, osteogenic, and angiogenic properties of titanium implants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(36):42965–42980. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c08233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tao J., Sun Y., Wang G., Sun J., Dong S., Ding J. Advanced biomaterials for targeting mature biofilms in periodontitis therapy. Bioact Mater. 2025;48:474–492. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Liu J., Han X., Zhang T., Tian K., Li Z., Luo F. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging biomaterials for anti-inflammatory diseases: from mechanism to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01512-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Pagano M.A., Frezzato F., Visentin A., Trentin L., Brunati A.M. Protein phosphorylation and redox status: an as yet elusive dyad in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(19):4881. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chen H., Zhao Z., Zhang R., et al. Adaptable hydrogel with strong adhesion of wet tissue for long-term protection of periodontitis wound. Adv Mater. 2025;37(1) doi: 10.1002/adma.202413373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Li X., Qi M., Li C., et al. Novel nanoparticles of cerium-doped zeolitic imidazolate frameworks with dual benefits of antibacterial and anti-inflammatory functions against periodontitis. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(44):6955–6971. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01743g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang X., Wang H., Cheng J., et al. Initiative ROS generation of Cu-doped ZIF-8 for excellent antibacterial performance. Chem Eng J. 2023;466 [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhang C., Shu Z., Sun H., et al. Cu(II)@ZIF-8 nanoparticles with dual enzyme-like activity bound to bacteria specifically for efficient and durable bacterial inhibition. Appl Surf Sci. 2023;611 [Google Scholar]
- 85.Pinegin B., Vorobjeva N., Pashenkov M., Chernyak B. The role of mitochondrial ROS in antibacterial immunity. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(5):3745–3754. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zhu C., Huang K., Li T., et al. Manganese dioxide coupled metal-organic framework as mitophagy regulator alleviates periodontitis through SIRT1-FOXO3-BNIP3 signaling axis. Biomaterials. 2025;319 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yang Q., Sun X., Ding Q., et al. An ATP-responsive metal-organic framework against periodontitis via synergistic ion-interference-mediated pyroptosis. Natl Sci Rev. 2024;11(8):nwae225. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.GBD 2021 Oral Disorders Collaborators Trends in the global, regional, and national burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2025;405(10482):897–910. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02811-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Heo S.C., Nam I.H., Keum B.R., Yun Y.G., Lee J.Y., Kim H.J. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 derived from oral squamous cell carcinoma promotes cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation and tumor growth. Mol Biomed. 2025;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s43556-025-00281-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang Z., Sun X., Gao Z., et al. Prussian blue nanoparticle-induced alteration of the polarization state of tumor-associated macrophages as a substantial antitumor mechanism against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) Int J Nanomedicine. 2025;20:10667–10681. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S528763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wei F., Hou L., Yao Y., et al. An intelligent Cu/ZIF-8-based nanodrug delivery system for tumor-specific and synergistic therapy via tumor microenvironment-responsive cascade reaction. Mikrochim Acta. 2024;191(8):447. doi: 10.1007/s00604-024-06527-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hao J., Chen C., Pavelic K., Ozer F. ZIF-8 as a pH-responsive nanoplatform for 5-fluorouracil delivery in the chemotherapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(17):9292. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhang H., Zhang Q., Guo Z., et al. Disulfiram-loaded metal organic framework for precision cancer treatment via ultrasensitive tumor microenvironment-responsive copper chelation and radical generation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;615:517–526. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhao J., Sun Q., Mo D., et al. A self-cascade oxygen-generating nanomedicine for multimodal tumor therapy. Small. 2024;20(44) doi: 10.1002/smll.202403523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Zhang D., Zhang M., Fan H., Sun R., Liu J., Ma W. FA-PEG modified ZIF(Mn) nanoparticles loaded with baicalin for imaging-guided treatment of melanoma in mice. Int J Nanomedicine. 2024;19:13593–13613. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S493185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Pan Y.B., Wang S., He X., et al. A combination of glioma in vivo imaging and in vivo drug delivery by metal-organic framework based composite nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(48):7683–7689. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01651a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang W., Liu Y., Yang C., et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass combined with graphene oxide scaffolds for bone repair. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(10):2156–2169. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.35670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zou F., Jiang J., Lv F., Xia X., Ma X. Preparation of antibacterial and osteoconductive 3D-printed PLGA/Cu(I)@ZIF-8 nanocomposite scaffolds for infected bone repair. J Nanobiotechnology. 2020;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00594-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shu Z., Zhang C., Yan L., et al. Antibacterial and osteoconductive polycaprolactone/polylactic acid/nano-hydroxyapatite/Cu@ZIF-8 GBR membrane with asymmetric porous structure. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;224:1040–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhou Y., Jia H., Hu A., Liu R., Zeng X., Wang H. Nanoparticles targeting delivery antagomir-483-5p to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells treat osteoporosis by increasing bone formation. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;18(1):115–126. doi: 10.2174/1574888X17666220426120850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Li J., Chen Y., Zha D., et al. Mg-ZIF nanozyme regulates the switch between osteogenic and lipogenic differentiation in BMSCs via lipid metabolism. Lipids Health Dis. 2024;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02083-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Li L., Zhao J., Ma F., et al. The Mg doping ZIF-8 loaded with Icariin and its antibacterial and osteogenic performances. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2023;34(10):50. doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06755-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Qin K., Huang X., Wang S., Liang J., Fan Z. 3D-printed in situ growth of bilayer MOF hydrogels for accelerated osteochondral defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(2) doi: 10.1002/adhm.202403840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ghosh A., Fathima Thanutty Kallungal S., Ramaprabhu S. 2D metal-organic frameworks: properties, synthesis, and applications in electrochemical and optical biosensors. Biosensors (Basel) 2023;13(1):123. doi: 10.3390/bios13010123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sahar K.U., Rafiq K., Abid M.Z., et al. Coupling plasmonic and electron-mediated effects in Ag(x) @r-TiO(2)/g-C(3)N(4) heterostructures for enhanced catalytic hydrogen generation. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7(17):5384–5400. doi: 10.1039/d5na00267b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Itahana K., Itahana Y., Dimri G.P. Colorimetric detection of senescence-associated β galactosidase. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;965:143–156. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-239-1_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Liu H., Wang H., Chu T., Yu M., Yang Y. An electrodeposited lanthanide MOF thin film as a luminescent sensor for carbonate detection in aqueous solution. J Mater Chem C. 2014;2(41):8683–8690. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Meskher H., Belhaouari S.B., Sharifianjazi F. Mini review about metal organic framework (MOF)-based wearable sensors: challenges and prospects. Heliyon. 2023;9(11) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Romero L.E., Chatterjee P., Armentano R.L. An IoT approach for integration of computational intelligence and wearable sensors for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis and monitoring. Health Technol-Ger. 2016;6(3):167–172. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wang Y., Su P., Lin Z., et al. A tribo/piezoelectric nanogenerator based on Bio-MOFs for energy harvesting and antibacterial wearable device. Adv Mater. 2025;37(9) doi: 10.1002/adma.202418207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Li M., Liang Z., Sun X., Gong T., Zhang Z. A polymeric prodrug of 5-fluorouracil-1-acetic acid using a multi-hydroxyl polyethylene glycol derivative as the drug carrier. PLoS One. 2014;9(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Drozdov A.S., Nikitin P.I., Rozenberg J.M. Systematic review of cancer targeting by nanoparticles revealed a global association between accumulation in tumors and spleen. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(23) doi: 10.3390/ijms222313011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Pang X., He X., Qiu Z., et al. Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01259-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Li Q., Liu F., Zhang S., Xu Y., Guo Y., Liu Y. Layered dual-metal nodes metal organic frameworks artificial nanozymes boost the production of reactive oxygen species for antibacterial of drug-resistant bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;693 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Schmalz G., Widbiller M., Galler K.M. Signaling molecules and pulp regeneration. J Endod. 2017;43(9s):S7–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Zhu P., Wang S., Zhang Y., et al. Carbon dots in biomedicine: a review. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022;5(5):2031–2045. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c01215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zhang T., Yu Y., Lu Y., et al. Bridging biodegradable metals and biodegradable polymers: a comprehensive review of biodegradable metal–organic frameworks for biomedical application. Prog Mater Sci. 2026;155 [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wiśniewska P., Haponiuk J., Saeb M.R., Rabiee N., Bencherif S.A. Mitigating metal-organic framework (MOF) toxicity for biomedical applications. Chem Eng J. 2023;471 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Forgan R.S. Reproducibility in research into metal-organic frameworks in nanomedicine. Commun Mater. 2024;5(1):46. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Abánades Lázaro I., Chen X., Ding M., et al. Metal–organic frameworks for biological applications. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2024;4(1):42. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Soman S., Kulkarni S., Kulkarni J., et al. Metal–organic frameworks: a biomimetic odyssey in cancer theranostics. Nanoscale. 2025;17(20):12620–12647. doi: 10.1039/d5nr00794a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Paul T., Juma A., Alqerem R., Karanikolos G., Arafat H.A., Dumée L.F. Scale-up of metal-organic frameworks production: engineering strategies and prospects towards sustainable manufacturing. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11(5) [Google Scholar]
- 123.Beh J.J., Lim J.K., Ng E.P., Ooi B.S. Synthesis and size control of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8): from the perspective of reaction kinetics and thermodynamics of nucleation. Mater Chem Phys. 2018;216:393–401. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zhang W., Taheri-Ledari R., Saeidirad M., et al. Regulation of porosity in MOFs: a review on tunable scaffolds and related effects and advances in different applications. J Environ Chem Eng. 2022;10(6) [Google Scholar]
- 125.Xiang W., Zhang Y., Chen Y., Liu C-J, Tu X. Synthesis, characterization and application of defective metal–organic frameworks: current status and perspectives. J Mater Chem A. 2020;8(41):21526–21546. [Google Scholar]
- 126.ul Qadir N., Said S.A.M., Bahaidarah H.M. Structural stability of metal organic frameworks in aqueous media – controlling factors and methods to improve hydrostability and hydrothermal cyclic stability. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015;201:61–90. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Tien E-P, Cao G., Chen Y., et al. Electron beam and thermal stabilities of MFM-300(M) metal–organic frameworks. J Mater Chem A. 2024;12(36):24165–24174. doi: 10.1039/d4ta03302g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Dietrich A., Beckert N., Hubbuch J. Time-dependent particle size increase during lipid nanoparticle purification by cross-flow filtration. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;694 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Farag M.M., Abd-Allah W.M., Ibrahim A.M. Effect of gamma irradiation on drug releasing from nano-bioactive glass. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2015;5(1):63–73. doi: 10.1007/s13346-014-0214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Bernal-Chávez S.A., Del Prado-Audelo M.L., Caballero-Florán I.H., et al. Insights into terminal sterilization processes of nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Molecules. 2021;26(7) doi: 10.3390/molecules26072068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Howarth A.J., Liu Y., Li P., et al. Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal–organic frameworks. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1(3) [Google Scholar]
- 132.Carraro F., Williams J.D., Linares-Moreau M., et al. Continuous-flow synthesis of ZIF-8 biocomposites with tunable particle size. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59(21):8123–8127. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Menon D., Fairen-Jimenez D. Guiding the rational design of biocompatible metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery. Matter. 2025;8(3) [Google Scholar]
- 134.Hefayathullah M., Singh S., Ganesan V., Maduraiveeran G. Metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;331 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Samaranayake L., Tuygunov N., Schwendicke F., et al. The transformative role of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive overview. Part 1: fundamentals of AI, and its contemporary applications in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2025;75(2):383–396. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tuygunov N., Samaranayake L., Khurshid Z., et al. The transformative role of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive overview part 2: the promise and perils, and the international dental federation communique. Int Dent J. 2025;75(2):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.







