Abstract
Background:
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) microspheres are permanent dermal fillers used in aesthetic procedures but may cause foreign body granulomas, resulting in chronic inflammation and discomfort. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties, has shown promise in granuloma management, although robust evidence remains limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of allopurinol, alone or in combination with steroids, in treating PMMA-induced granulomas.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for English-language studies on human participants with PMMA-induced granulomas treated with allopurinol ± steroids. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies, case series, and reports. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed bias using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Qualitative synthesis was performed because of study heterogeneity and low evidence quality.
Results:
Out of more than 2500 articles identified, 6 studies (5 case reports, 1 case series; n = 8 women, aged 47–83 y) met the inclusion criteria. Granulomas developed 7 months to more than 10 years postinjection. Allopurinol (200–600 mg/d orally, 2–32 mo), alone or combined with steroids, lasers, or antibiotics, improved edema, erythema, tenderness, and nodularity, achieving partial or complete resolution in all cases. Reported adverse events were mild.
Conclusions:
Allopurinol seems to be a safe and potentially effective treatment for PMMA-induced granulomas, offering a steroid-sparing option. However, available evidence is limited to small, low-quality studies. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy and optimal dosing, and compare therapeutic strategies.
Takeaways
Question: What is the therapeutic efficacy and safety of allopurinol, alone or with steroids, in treating polymethylmethacrylate-induced foreign body granulomas?
Findings: A systematic review of 6 case reports/series (n = 8; age, 47–83 y) showed that allopurinol (200–600 mg/d, 2–32 mo) alone or with steroids, lasers, or antibiotics reduced edema, erythema, tenderness, and nodules, achieving partial to complete resolution. Adverse effects were mild (eg, transient hair loss).
Meaning: Allopurinol is a promising and well-tolerated treatment for polymethylmethacrylate-induced granulomas based on case reports; however, high-quality studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and optimize dosing.
INTRODUCTION
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) microspheres are widely used as permanent dermal fillers because of their durability and biocompatibility.1,2 However, a notable complication is the formation of foreign body granulomas, a chronic inflammatory reaction to the injected material.3 These granulomas, though relatively rare (≈1% of cases),4 can cause pain; swelling; aesthetic dissatisfaction; and, occasionally, functional impairment.3,4 Unlike hyaluronic acid fillers, PMMA is nonbiodegradable, making its complications more persistent and challenging to treat.5 Current management strategies include systemic or intralesional corticosteroids, which may cause adverse effects or fail to fully resolve lesions. Surgical excision is an option, but it is invasive and carries a risk of scarring.3,6,7 The long-term and often refractory nature of PMMA-related complications highlights the need for safer, more effective, and steroid-sparing therapies.
Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor primarily used for gout, has emerged as a potential therapeutic agent for managing granulomatous inflammation owing to its anti-inflammatory properties.8–10 Preliminary studies suggest that allopurinol, alone or combined with steroids, improves symptoms and may reduce the need for prolonged steroid therapy.8–10 However, evidence remains limited to small case reports and series. In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize available evidence on the use of allopurinol, with or without steroids, for PMMA-induced granulomas to inform clinical practice and guide future research. It is worth noting that this review relies entirely on case reports and case series without any controlled trials (RCTs), which limits the ability to draw causal inferences or generalize the findings. Therefore, this study serves as an exploratory review to provide a basis for robust studies, rather than evidence of efficacy.
Background
The growing demand for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures has increased the use of soft-tissue fillers. The ideal soft-tissue filler should be safe, biocompatible, resistant to phagocytosis, and able to maintain volume without degradation.11 Hyaluronic acid fillers are the most commonly used and last 6–24 months, but some patients seek more durable results and opt for permanent fillers such as PMMA.5 Permanent injectable facial fillers are used to treat wrinkles, restore volume loss, and modify facial structures altered by the aging process.12 PMMA carries a risk of late complications, including granuloma formation, which can occur from months to more than 10 years postinjection.4,12 Clinically, granulomas present as nodules, swelling, discoloration, and tenderness, often causing patient distress. Their pathogenesis involves immune activation, infection, or injection technique errors.12
Pathophysiology of PMMA-related Granulomas
Granulomas are tumor-like inflammatory lesions formed by aggregates of macrophages, often accompanied by multinucleated giant cells.3 In foreign body granulomas, macrophages are unable to phagocytose the injected PMMA particles, leading to chronic inflammation.3 The process involves sequential steps, including protein adsorption, macrophage adhesion, macrophage fusion, and intercellular crosstalk, culminating in persistent granulomatous inflammation.3
Current Treatment Strategies
No standardized treatment protocol exists for PMMA-related granulomas. Oral and intralesional corticosteroids remain first-line therapy but require prolonged use and are associated with adverse effects. Other options include allopurinol, fumaric acid esters, tetracyclines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or surgical excision for well-defined lesions.12–14 Emerging evidence supports the clinical benefits of allopurinol, particularly in steroid-refractory cases.8–10
Allopurinol and Its Anti-inflammatory Properties
Allopurinol is an XO inhibitor approved for the prevention of gout and chemotherapy-induced hyperuricemia.15–18 By blocking the conversion of hypoxanthine to xanthine and uric acid, it reduces uric acid levels and oxidative stress.17 Beyond its urate-lowering effect, allopurinol reduces reactive oxygen species production, suppresses proinflammatory cytokines, and modulates immune cell activity. These mechanisms support its use as an adjunct therapy in inflammatory conditions, including PMMA-induced granulomas.19–23
XO inhibition modulates granulomatous inflammation by preventing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines.24,25 XO catalyzes the production of uric acid and superoxide radicals from purine bases.24,25 Uric acid can initiate a series of inflammatory responses by activating the inflammasome and NF-κB pathways in endothelial cells, inducing the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Simultaneously, XO generates hydroxyl radicals from superoxide intermediates, amplifying oxidative stress and inflammation.24,25 In granulomatous conditions, allopurinol inhibits granuloma formation by suppressing multinucleated giant cell development via the inhibition of the monocyte P2X7 receptor and intracellular adhesion molecule-1, which contribute to granuloma formation.26
Other steroid-sparing agents (minocycline and doxycycline), in addition to their antibiotic properties, have been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic activities by inhibiting nitric oxide synthases, cyclooxygenase-2 and phospholipases A2, and matrix metallopeptidases.26 Clinical studies have reported minocycline’s efficacy in inflammatory acne, noninfectious dermatitis, rosacea, bullous dermatoses, and neutrophilic dermatoses; however, doxycycline has been preferred recently because of its similar efficacy with fewer complications.26
Aim and Objectives
Aim
The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of allopurinol, alone or with corticosteroids, in the treatment of PMMA-related foreign body granulomas.
Objectives
Assess the effectiveness of allopurinol in reducing inflammation and resolving granulomas.
Evaluate potential synergistic effects with corticoste-roids.
Determine the safety profile and report adverse effects of allopurinol in this context.
Summarize available data on dosing, administration route, and treatment duration.
Provide considerations for clinical management of PMMA-induced granulomas based on the available evidence.
METHODS
Study Design
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD420251142672.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria were studies published in English between January 2000 and July 2025, focusing on individuals with PMMA-induced foreign body granulomas treated with allopurinol, with or without steroids, and reporting clinical outcomes such as granuloma resolution, reduction in inflammation, recurrence rates, or adverse events. Exclusion criteria included animal studies, in vitro studies, investigations not specifically addressing PMMA-induced granulomas, nonhuman studies, studies lacking clinical outcomes, non-English publications, and studies with insufficient data for extraction. Eligible study designs included RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports, all published in peer-reviewed journals.
Information Sources
A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Reference lists of included articles were also manually screened for additional publications.
Search Strategy
The search strategy combined keywords and Medical Subject Headings, including allopurinol, PMMA, foreign body granuloma, dermal fillers, steroids, corticosteroids, inflammation, complications, and adverse effects. Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used to refine the searches.
Selection Process
Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for eligibility based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full-text articles of potentially relevant studies were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion.
Data Collection Process
Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers using a standardized template. Extracted information was cross-verified for accuracy, and disagreements were resolved through consensus.
Data Items
Extracted data included study characteristics (author, year of publication, study design, sample size), patient demographics (age, sex, relevant medical history), treatment details (allopurinol dosage, type and dosage of corticosteroid, route of administration, duration of therapy), and reported outcomes (granuloma resolution rates, reduction in inflammation, recurrence rates, adverse events).
Study Risk of Bias Assessment
All eligible studies were case reports or case series; the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists for case reports and case series were applied to evaluate methodological quality, focusing on aspects such as clear reporting of patient history, clinical condition, treatment details, and outcomes.
Synthesis Methods
A qualitative synthesis was conducted using a narrative summary to describe study characteristics, treatment protocols, and outcomes, identifying patterns in the efficacy and safety of allopurinol for PMMA-induced granulomas. Quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis using random-effects models was planned if sufficient homogeneity existed across studies, and statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. However, owing to the eligibility of only case reports and series, only a qualitative synthesis was conducted.
Certainty Assessment
Given the type of studies included, the certainty of evidence was not formally graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Included studies were either case reports or series with low evidence levels.
RESULTS
More than 2500 articles were identified in the initial search, but only 6 met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The search yielded no RCTs, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, or case-control studies, underscoring the emerging nature of allopurinol and its reliance on case reports and case series.
Fig. 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for the included studies.
Characteristics of the Included Studies
The 6 included studies, published between 2003 and 2020, comprised 5 single case reports and 1 case series. (See table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which displays characteristics of the included studies, https://links.lww.com/PRSGO/E794.) All reports involved women aged 47–83 years who developed delayed granulomatous reactions following Artecoll (PMMA/collagen) filler injections. The period between filler injection and clinical presentation of granulomas varied widely (from 7 mo to >10 y). Clinical manifestations of foreign body granulomas typically include swelling, erythema, and nodules. Artecoll was the PMMA filler used in most cases.
Effectiveness of Allopurinol in PMMA-related Inflammation and Granuloma
Across the included reports, allopurinol demonstrated consistent effectiveness in reducing inflammation and granuloma size, with improvements in symptoms, such as edema, erythema, tenderness, and nodule firmness. In cases where allopurinol was used alone,8,9 outcomes were positive, with gradual resolution during 4–24 weeks. Fischer et al27 reported gradual swelling reduction after 6 weeks on allopurinol (up to 600 mg/d), with partial nodule resolution and ulcer healing during an additional 16 weeks in a 48-year-old woman with disfiguring facial edema. Similarly, Reisberger et al.9 reported reduced tenderness and erythema in a 61-year-old woman after 8 weeks of treatment (starting at 200 mg/d and increasing to 600 mg/d), which progressed to softening and color improvement during the next 8 weeks, with only slight discoloration remaining at 24 weeks. In a separate case report, Silveira et al8 observed significant lesion healing within the first month of allopurinol treatment in a 56-year-old woman (initially 200 mg/d, then 300 mg/d), restoring the skin to a physiological state with no relapse at the 3-month follow-up. Redondo et al28 found that a daily dose of 300 mg for 2 months was effective in achieving complete resolution of the lesions within 2 months, with no recurrence noted at the 1-year follow-up.
In combination therapies,29,30 allopurinol contributed to the resolution of foreign body granulomas. Gelfer et al29 described 3 cases where allopurinol was combined with intralesional triamcinolone and other modalities. In case 1, the patient achieved remission 6 months after the postfinal treatment, case 2 showed partial resolution after 2.5 years, and case 3 had complete resolution after 13 months. González-Delgado et al30 reported a slow but steady improvement in an 83-year-old woman treated with allopurinol (300 mg/d) plus cyclic mometasone furoate, achieving full lesion control after 8 months, including resolution of edema and scarring. Based on the included cases, allopurinol effectively reduced inflammation and granuloma formation. It should be noted that this review is based solely on case reports and case series, lacking controlled trials; thus, it serves as an exploratory overview to inform future robust studies rather than providing evidence of efficacy.
Safety Profile and Potential Adverse Effects of Allopurinol
All reports indicated that allopurinol treatment was well tolerated by the patients. Overall, the safety profile of allopurinol was favorable across studies, with minimal adverse effects reported. Most studies reported no adverse effects.8,9,30 Minor events included transient hair loss and mild, clinically insignificant liver enzyme elevations, which did not necessitate treatment discontinuation.30 No serious adverse events were reported.
Optimal Dosing, Administration Routes, and Treatment Duration
Allopurinol was exclusively administered orally, with an initial dose of 200–300 mg/d and a maximum dose of 600 mg/d in 2 reports. (See table, Supplemental Digital Content 2, which displays optimal dosing, administration routes, and treatment duration based on the included cases, https://links.lww.com/PRSGO/E795.) The duration of prescription was 4 months for monotherapy and 8–32 months when combined with other treatments. No studies reported intravenous or topical administration. Evidence suggests starting at 200 mg/d with gradual titration if needed, and maintaining treatment for several months to ensure sustained remission. Figure 2 shows the proposed staged management of PMMA-induced granulomas.
Fig. 2.
Staged management of PMMA-induced granuloma.
DISCUSSION
Principal Findings
This systematic review evaluated the therapeutic benefits of allopurinol, with or without steroids, in managing PMMA-induced foreign body granulomas. Across all included reports, allopurinol was associated with consistent clinical improvements, including reductions in edema, erythema, tenderness, and nodule firmness, leading to gradual lesion resolution over weeks to months.8,9,27,31 These results align with the established anti-inflammatory mechanisms of allopurinol, including the inhibition of reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines,19–23 which may attenuate the macrophage-driven granulomatous response.3
Similar outcomes have been reported in silicone-associated granulomas,28 suggesting a broader therapeutic potential for allopurinol in foreign body–related inflammation. Clinically, this positions allopurinol as a viable alternative or adjunct to corticosteroids, potentially reducing the risks associated with prolonged steroid use, such as adrenal suppression, skin atrophy, and systemic metabolic effects.7 In aesthetic medicine, where PMMA complications can persist for years,5,12 allopurinol may improve both patient comfort and cosmetic outcomes.3,4
However, treatment duration varied widely (4–32 mo), highlighting the need for individualized therapy based on disease severity and clinical response. More robust studies are required to define optimal dosing, timing, and treatment duration.
Dosing, Monitoring, and Safety Considerations
Across the reviewed cases, oral doses ranged from 200 to 600 mg/d, usually starting low and titrated upward as needed. Monotherapy typically required 4–6 months, whereas combination regimens often required longer courses. Nonetheless, the lack of uniform dosing strategies underscores the need for standardized treatment protocols.
The safety profile of allopurinol was favorable, with only mild, reversible adverse effects such as transient hair loss, slight discoloration, and mild liver enzyme elevation.9,27 No discontinuations due to adverse events were reported. This compares favorably with corticosteroids, whose long-term use is limited by systemic toxicities.31,32 Accordingly, allopurinol may be particularly valuable when corticosteroids are contraindicated or poorly tolerated.
Several other considerations before using allopurinol are mostly related to potential drug interactions, implications in specific populations, regular monitoring, and treatment duration. The human leukocyte antigen B (HLA-B) plays a crucial role in the immune system; its variant, HLA-B*58:01 allele, is most common in the Asian population and is strongly associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions during treatment with allopurinol.33,34 Compared with African and White populations, Asian ethnicities may have a higher risk of serious skin cutaneous reactions if they have the B*58:01 allele.35 Consequently, clinicians recommended testing for HLA–B*58:01 before starting allopurinol in the Asian population.33,34 Potential drug interactions should also be considered when using allopurinol. Evidence indicates that the interaction of allopurinol with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine can lead to serious adverse outcomes, such as severe agranulocytosis and pancytopenia.35–37 Baseline and regular monitoring (2–5 wk) of complete blood count, liver function tests, renal function, and serum uric acid levels is required following allopurinol administration.37 Limited and low-quality evidence suggests optimal treatment responses after 4 months of allopurinol treatment, with no relapse cases in the included studies. Conditions requiring allopurinol discontinuation include the development of allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome, skin rashes, and other side effects such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.37
Consider allopurinol if the patient:
Has confirmed PMMA-induced foreign body granuloma (eg, following Artecoll or similar PMMA/collagen filler injections), with a delayed onset (7 mo to >10 y postinjection);
Has experienced recurrence or failure to resolve inflammation or nodule firmness despite adequate treatment with corticosteroids;
Has evidence of ongoing inflammation attributed to macrophage response or reactive oxygen species, where allopurinol’s anti-inflammatory mechanisms (XO inhibition and reduced proinflammatory cytokines) may attenuate granuloma progression;
Has experienced failure in prior treatments, such as steroids alone, shown partial response, or is contraindicated;
Has no high risk for HLA-B58:01-associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions, or has negative HLA-B58:01 testing;
Has no concurrent use of azathioprine or 6-mercapto-purine;
Has feasible baseline and ongoing laboratory monitoring for CBC, LFTs, renal function, and serum uric acid at baseline, and then every 2–5 weeks; and
Has no history of allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or severe rash with prior exposure.
Limitations
The evidence base for allopurinol in treating PMMA-induced foreign body granulomas remains limited to case reports and small series, with no RCTs or comparative studies. This inherently limits generalizability and precludes firm conclusions regarding efficacy. The heterogeneity in dosing regimens, treatment duration, and concurrent therapies further complicates interpretation.8,27–30 Additionally, small sample sizes and short follow-up periods (as little as 3 mo in some cases) may underestimate recurrence risk or late adverse effects.8 Additionally, restricting the search to English-language studies may have excluded relevant non-English publications, particularly from regions with high PMMA filler use. There is a potential publication bias due to the reporting of positive outcomes in case reports and series, as they often highlight successful treatments over unsuccessful ones.
Future Directions
Well-designed RCTs, cohort studies, and mechanistic investigations are needed to establish the efficacy, optimal dosing, and duration of allopurinol therapy for foreign body granulomas. Future comparative trials against corticosteroids and other immunomodulators would also clarify allopurinol’s place in therapy. Standardized treatment protocols, long-term follow-up, and recurrence monitoring are critical for developing evidence-based clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS
Emerging evidence from case reports and series suggests the potential safety and effectiveness of allopurinol for PMMA-induced foreign body granulomas, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids. Its favorable safety profile and steroid-sparing potential make it an attractive therapeutic choice. However, current data are limited to low-level evidence, and high-quality studies are urgently needed to confirm its efficacy and safety and to define standardized treatment regimens.
DISCLOSURE
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Published online 17 April 2026.
Disclosure statements are at the end of this article, following the correspondence information.
Related Digital Media are available in the full-text version of the article on www.PRSGlobalOpen.com.
REFERENCES
- 1.Mok D, Schwarz J. The use of polymethyl-methacrylate (Artecoll) as an adjunct to facial reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg. 2004;12:39–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hildebrand C, Martins MD, Danilevicz CK, et al. Location of injected polymethylmethacrylate microspheres influences the onset of late adverse effects: an experimental and histopathologic study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee JM, Kim YJ. Foreign body granulomas after the use of dermal fillers: pathophysiology, clinical appearance, histologic features, and treatment. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:232–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luciano P, Silva Rizzo EA, Oliveira MF, et al. Treatment of hypercalcemia related to polymethylmethacrylate injection: report of three cases. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025;23:eRC1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vengalil N, Council LM, Michalski BM. Foreign body granulomas to polymethylmethacrylate soft tissue filler following COVID-19 infection. JAAD Case Rep. 2023;41:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trinh LN, McGuigan KC, Gupta A. Delayed granulomas as a complication secondary to lip augmentation with dermal fillers: a systematic review. Surg J. 2022;8:e69–e79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ianhez M, Miot HA, Caetano LV, et al. Sarcoidosis and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) granulomas following COVID-19 vaccination (ChAdOx1): successful treatment with tofacitinib. Indian J Dermatol. 2024;69:328–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Silveira B, Alves BC, Candela Rambaldi ML, et al. The therapeutic benefit of allopurinol in the treatment of foreign body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate microspheres. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2012;2012:945205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reisberger EM, Landthaler M, Wiest L, et al. Foreign body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate microspheres: successful treatment with allopurinol. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:17–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martín JM, Revert A, Monteagudo C, et al. Granulomatous reactions to permanent cosmetic tattoos successfully treated with topical steroids and allopurinol. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:229–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santana KP, Pereira LH, Sabatovich O, et al. Foreign-body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) microspheres: successful correction by autologous fat transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e139–e141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tavares LOR, Diaz CRLDM, De Souza AVN, et al. Foreign body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) long-term/permanent facial fillers: a literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022;134:e227. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu H, Lee P, Sun A, et al. Polymethylmethacrylate-induced foreign body granuloma in the left lower lip. J Dent Sci. 2025;20:1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sivam S, Mackay C, Humphrey C, et al. Giant PMMA foreign body granulomas with imaging. J Cutaneous Aesthet Surg. 2023;16:256–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mackenzie IS, Hawkey CJ, Ford I, et al. ; ALL-HEART Study Group. Allopurinol versus usual care in UK patients with ischaemic heart disease (ALL-HEART): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1195–1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sekine M, Okamoto K, Pai EF, et al. Allopurinol and oxypurinol differ in their strength and mechanisms of inhibition of xanthine oxidoreductase. J Biol Chem. 2023;299:105162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dillman KM, Hawkins AM, Ragland AR, et al. Allopurinol: clinical considerations in the development and treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and other associated drug reactions. Cureus. 2024;16:e64517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huan X, Zhuo N, Lee HY, et al. Allopurinol non-covalently facilitates binding of unconventional peptides to HLA-B*58:01. Sci Rep. 2023;13:9373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Imeer ATA, Kadhum AAH, Lahhob QR, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of allopurinol; a mini-review on current concepts. J Nephropathol. 2025;14:e27587. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Al-Niemi MS, et al. The prospective effect of allopurinol on the oxidative stress index and endothelial dysfunction in Covid-19. Inflammation. 2022;45:1651–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ganz M, Alessandro C, Jacobs M, et al. Investigating the anti-inflammatory effect of allopurinol on the prevention of prostate cancer. Cureus. 2023;15:e40058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prieto-Moure B, Lloris-Carsí JM, Belda-Antolí M, et al. Allopurinol protective effect of renal ischemia by downregulating TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 response. J Investig Surg. 2017;30:143–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schlesinger N, Brunetti L. Beyond urate lowering: analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of allopurinol. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:444–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pratomo IP, Noor DR, Kusmardi K, et al. Xanthine oxidase-induced inflammatory responses in respiratory epithelial cells: a review in immunopathology of COVID-19. Int J Inflam. 2021;2021:1653392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Trinh PTN, Truc NC, Danh TT, et al. A study on the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity of the Artemisia vulgaris L. extract and its fractions. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;334:118519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Paulucci BP. PMMA safety for facial filling: review of rates of granuloma occurrence and treatment methods. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44:148–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fischer J, Metzler G, Schaller M. Cosmetic permanent fillers for soft tissue augmentation: a new contraindication for interferon therapies. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:507–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Redondo P, Del Olmo J, Alberola I. In situ and distant foreign body granulomas caused by silicone. Treatment with allopurinol. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:1064–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gelfer A, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, et al. The natural history of polymethylmethacrylate microspheres granulomas. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:614–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.González-Delgado VA, Cordero-Romero P, Terrádez-Mas L, et al. Foreign-body reaction to dermal filler: good response to treatment with allopurinol. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020;111:439–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Faggiano A, Mazzilli R, Natalicchio A, et al. ; Oncological Endocrinology Research Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. Corticosteroids in oncology: use, overuse, indications, contraindications. An Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)/Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD)/Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE)/Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;180:103826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Möhlmann JE, Ezzafzafi S, Lindemans CA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemic corticosteroids in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a review of current evidence. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024;63:1251–1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dean L, Kane M. Allopurinol therapy and HLA-B*58:01 genotype. In: Medical Genetics Summaries. National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2012. Updated August 25, 2020. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK127547/. Accessed December 24, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ng WL, Hussein N, Ng CJ, et al. Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing prior to allopurinol initiation in Malaysian primary care setting: a qualitative study from doctors’ and patients’ perspective. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0296498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stevens PE, Ahmed SB, Carrero JJ, et al. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105:S117–S314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gearry RB, Day AS, Barclay ML, et al. Azathioprine and allopurinol: a two-edged interaction. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:653–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qurie A, Preuss CV, Musa R. Allopurinol. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available at https://europepmc.org/article/NBK/nbk499942. Accessed December 24, 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


