Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2026 Mar 27;29(5):115510. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115510

NSF is required for diverse endocytic modes by promoting fusion and fission pore closure in secretory cells

Xin-Sheng Wu 1,7, Tao Sun 1,3,7, Bo Shi 1,4,7, Sunghoon Lee 1,5,7, Zheng Zhang 1,6, Lisi Wei 1, Xin Wang 1, Maryam Molakarimi 1, Sue Han 1, Aaron Uy 1, Lin Gan 2, Ling-Gang Wu 1,8,∗
PMCID: PMC13091539  PMID: 42004027

Summary

The ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), known for disassembling SNARE complexes, plays key roles in neurotransmitter release, neurotransmitter (AMPA, GABA, and dopamine) receptor trafficking, and synaptic plasticity, and its dysfunction or mutation is linked to neurological disorders. These roles are largely attributed to SNARE-mediated exocytosis. Here, we reveal an unexpected role for NSF: mediating diverse modes of endocytosis—including slow, fast, ultrafast, overshoot, and bulk—by driving closure of both fusion and fission pores. This function was consistently observed across large calyx nerve terminals, small hippocampal boutons, and chromaffin cells using capacitance recordings, synapto-pHluorin imaging, electron microscopy, and multi-color pore-closure imaging. Results were robust across four NSF inhibitors, gene knockout, knockdown, and mutations. Furthermore, NSF facilitates content release. These findings establish NSF as a central regulator of membrane fission, kiss-and-run fusion, endocytosis, and exo-endocytosis coupling, providing a mechanistic basis for its diverse roles in synaptic transmission, receptor trafficking, and disease.

Subject areas: Neuroscience, Cellular neuroscience

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • •

    NSF is essential for slow, fast, ultrafast, overshoot, and bulk endocytosis

  • •

    NSF promotes endocytosis by closing fusion pores and pre-existing Ω-profiles’ pore

  • •

    NSF promotes pore closures (including kiss-and-run) by disassembling SNARE complex

  • •

    NSF facilitates vesicular content release


Neuroscience; Cellular neuroscience

Introduction

The ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) is well-known to disassemble the soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex, composed of synaptobrevin, SNAP-25, and syntaxin, which drives vesicle fusion, releasing neurotransmitters and hormones. Genetic loss of NSF results in the accumulation of cis-SNARE complexes on synaptic vesicles and inhibition of transmitter release in Drosophila synapses.1 Acute peptide-based perturbation experiments in giant squid synapses show that impaired NSF activity causes a rapid block in neurotransmission and slowing down of release, suggesting that SNARE complex disassembly is crucial for transmitter release at the pre-fusion state.2,3 Mutation and pharmacological inhibition of NSF reveal NSF in regulating vesicle priming for fusion at release sites in Drosophila synapses and mouse hippocampal synapses,4,5 suggesting that the SNARE complex disassembly is important for vesicle priming at the pre-fusion state. Besides regulating vesicle fusion at the nerve terminal, NSF has been shown to regulate the trafficking of important neurotransmitter receptors, such as AMPA receptors, GABA receptors, and dopamine receptors, thereby regulating synaptic plasticity.6 Aggregation, functional impairment, and/or mutation of NSF have been linked to major neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and epilepsy.6 In brief, NSF is crucial for transmitter release, neurotransmitter receptor trafficking, synaptic plasticity, and neurological disorders. These diverse physiological functions and pathological roles have been largely attributed to its ability to disassemble the SNARE complex, crucial for vesicle priming and release.6

Little is known about whether NSF plays any role after vesicle fusion, such as the fusion pore expansion and closure, and subsequent endocytosis that recycles exocytosed vesicles to sustain synaptic transmission and exocytosis in secretory cells. Here, we studied whether NSF is involved in these post-fusion roles by (1) measuring slow, fast, and ultrafast endocytosis with capacitance measurements in chromaffin cells and calyx of Held synapses, (2) detecting endocytosis with synapto-pHluorin imaging in hippocampal synapses, and (3) quantifying bulk endocytosis with electron microscopy (EM) in hippocampal synapses. By inhibiting NSF with various pharmacological inhibitors, gene knockout or knockdown, we found, to our surprise, that NSF is essential for each of these different forms of endocytosis in three preparations. By imaging fusion pore opening and closure, as well as the fission pore closure, we found that NSF is crucial in mediating diverse forms of endocytosis mentioned above by playing a critical role in closing both fusion and fission pores in chromaffin cells. These results suggest including NSF as a key player in the current models of membrane fission, diverse modes of endocytosis, vesicle recycling, and exo-endocytosis coupling, which may contribute to accounting for NSF’s diverse physiological and pathological roles discussed above.

Results

NSF is involved in slow and fast endocytosis at calyces

Recording conditions

We measured slow (Figure 1) and fast (Figure 2) endocytosis by whole-cell capacitance recordings at calyces with a pipette containing either a control solution or one of the following four types of NSF (ATPase) inhibitors: (1) ATPγS (replacing ATP, 4 mM, n = 6) or 0 ATP (n = 7), (2) N-ethylmaleimide (NEM, 1 mM, n = 12), (3) an NSF peptide (NSFp, 1 mM, n = 9),3 and (4) an SNAP peptide (SNAPp, 1 mM, n = 8) that blocks the binding between NSF and SNAP (soluble NSF attachment protein), a chaperone for recruiting NSF.7 The corresponding control solution for peptides contained either mutated NSFp (NSFmp, 1 mM, n = 10) or scrambled SNAPp (SNAPsp, 1 mM, n = 7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NSF is involved in slow endocytosis at calyces

(A) Sampled calcium current (ICa) induced by depol20ms in a calyx of Held. Vertical scale bar, 1 nA; horizontal scale bar, 20 ms.

(B) Sampled single traces showing membrane capacitance (Cm) changes induced by depol20ms (gray arrowheads) at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing a control solution (Ctrl, black), 4 mM ATPγS (replacing ATP) (red), or 1 mM NEM (blue). The Cm decay in Ctrl was fitted with a mono-exponential function (left, fit line in gray, τ = 10.6 s). Vertical scale bar, 200 fF; horizontal scale bar, 10 s. Scale bars apply to all traces in (B).

(C) Averaged traces showing capacitance changes induced by depol20ms (gray arrowhead) at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing a control solution (black, 11 calyces, from 5 male and 6 female rats), 4 mM ATPγS (replacing ATP, red, 6 calyces, from 3 male and 3 female rats) or 1 mM NEM (blue, 12 calyces, from 6 male and 6 female rats). The peak amplitude of the ΔCmpeak was normalized (Avg/Norm), and data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. every 5 s (applies also to E and G). Horizontal scale bar, 10 s.

(D and E) Similar arrangements as in (B) and (C), respectively, but with NSFmp (1 mM, black, Ctrl, 10 calyces, from 5 male and 5 female rats) or NSFp (1 mM, red, 9 calyces, from 4 male and 5 female rats). Vertical scale bar, 200 fF; horizontal scale bars, 10 s.

(F–G) Similar arrangements as in (D) and (E), respectively, but with SNAPsp (1 mM, black, Ctrl, 7 calyces, from 3 male and 4 female rats) or SNAPp (1 mM, red, 8 calyces, from 4 male and 4 female rats). Vertical scale bar, 200 fF; horizontal scale bars, 10 s.

(H) The Ratedecay_n (upper) and ΔCmpeak (lower) induced by depol20ms at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing the control solution (Ctrl, 11 calyces, from 5 male and 6 female rats), ATPγS (4 mM, 6 calyces, from 3 male and 3 female rats), NEM (1 mM, 12 calyces, from 6 male and 6 female rats), NSFmp (1 mM, 10 calyces, from 5 male and 5 female rats), NSFp (1 mM, 9 calyces, from 4 male and 5 female rats), SNAPsp (1 mM, 7 calyces, from 3 male and 4 female rats), or SNAPp (1 mM, 8 calyces, from 4 male and 4 female rats). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle represents the data from a single calyx. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test). See also Figures S1 and S2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

NSF is involved in fast endocytosis at calyces

(A) Sampled calcium current (ICa) induced by depol20msX10 in a calyx of Held. Vertical scale bar, 1 nA; horizontal scale bar, 400 ms.

(B) Sampled single traces showing membrane capacitance (Cm) changes induced by depol20msX10 (gray arrowheads) at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing a control solution (black, Ctrl), 4 mM ATPγS (replacing ATP) (red) or 1 mM NEM (blue). The Cm decay in Ctrl was fitted with a bi-exponential function (left; gray fit line) with τ1 = 1.4 s (weight: 29%) and τ2 = 18.3 s. Vertical scale bar, 300 fF; horizontal scale bar, 10 s. Scale bars apply to all traces in (B).

(C) Averaged traces showing capacitance changes induced by depol20msX10 (gray arrowhead) at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing a control solution (black, 11 calyces, from 5 male and 6 female rats), 4 mM ATPγS (replacing ATP, red, 6 calyces, from 3 male and 3 female rats), or 1 mM NEM (blue, 12 calyces, from 6 male and 6 female rats). The peak amplitude of the ΔCmpeak is normalized (Avg/Norm), and data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. every 5 s (applies also to E and G). Horizontal scale bar, 10 s.

(D and E) Similar arrangements as in (B) and (C), respectively, but with NSFmp (1 mM, black, Ctrl, 10 calyces, from 5 male and 5 female rats) or NSFp (1 mM, red, 9 calyces, from 4 male and 5 female rats). Vertical scale bar, 300 fF; horizontal scale bars, 10 s.

(F and G) Similar arrangements as in (D) and (E), respectively, but with SNAPsp (1 mM, black, Ctrl, 7 calyces, from 3 male and 4 female rats) or SNAPp (1 mM, red, 8 calyces, from 4 male and 4 female rats). Vertical scale bar, 300 fF; horizontal scale bars, 10 s.

(H) The Ratedecay_n (upper) and ΔCmpeak (lower) induced by depol20msX10 at 4–10 min after break-in with a pipette containing the control solution (Ctrl, 11 calyces, from 5 male and 6 female rats), ATPγS (4 mM, 6 calyces, from 3 male and 3 female rats), NEM (1 mM, 12 calyces, from 6 male and 6 female rats), NSFmp (1 mM, 10 calyces, from 5 male and 5 female rats), NSFp (1 mM, 9 calyces, from 4 male and 5 female rats), SNAPsp (1 mM, 7 calyces, from 3 male and 4 female rats), or SNAPp (1 mM, 8 calyces, from 4 male and 4 female rats). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle represents data from a single calyx. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test). See also Figure S2.

Quantifying slow and fast endocytosis in control

We first analyzed data during 4–10 min after whole-cell break-in. In control, we induced slow and fast endocytosis with 1 and 10 pulses of 20 ms depolarization (from −80 to +10 mV, if not mentioned otherwise) at 10 Hz, called depol20ms (Figure 1A) and depol20msX10 (Figure 2A), respectively.8,9,10 A depol20ms induced a capacitance jump (ΔCmpeak) of 531 ± 55 fF (n = 11), followed by a slow decay with a τ of 10.2 ± 0.9 s (n = 11) and an initial decay rate (Ratedecay), measured during 0.5–4 s after depol20ms (see also “STAR Methods”), of 56 ± 9 fF/s (n = 11, e.g., Figure 1B, left). A depol20msX10 induced a ΔCmpeak of 1,565 ± 115 fF (n = 11), followed by a bi-exponential decay with a rapid τ of 1.6 ± 0.3 s (amplitude: 31 ± 4%) and a slow τ of 15.5 ± 1.4 s (n = 11, e.g., Figure 2B). The Ratedecay, measured during 0.5–1.5 s after depol20msX10 (see also “STAR Methods”), was 301 ± 55 fF/s (n = 11, e.g., Figure 2B, left), which reflected mostly (>80%) the rapid component of endocytosis as demonstrated previously.8,9,10 When NSFmp or SNAPsp was included, serving as the control for NSFp or SNAPp, it did not significantly affect the results described above (Figures 1D–1H and 2D–2H). These control results were similar to previous reports.8,9,10

Ratedecay at calyces was measured between 0.5 and 4 s after depol20ms that induced slow endocytosis, but between 0.5 and 1.5 s after depol20msX10 that induced rapid endocytosis.9,10,11 Ratedecay_n was measured as Ratedecay divided by the capacitance jump peak amplitude (ΔCmpeak).

When ΔCmpeak was normalized to 1, the initial rate of Cm decay (Ratedecay_n, see “STAR Methods” for calculation) after depol20ms was 0.09 ± 0.01/s (n = 11), meaning 9% of ΔCmpeak was retrieved at the first second after stimulation. The Ratedecay_n after depol20msX10 (see “STAR Methods” for calculation) was 0.12 ± 0.01/s (n = 11), which largely reflected the normalized rapid endocytosis rate.8,9,10 Throughout the study, we compared these normalized values (Ratedecay_n) in control and in the presence of drugs. We did not compare τ, because τ was often too long to estimate in the presence of blockers (Figures 1 and 2). We did not compare Ratedecay, because it is influenced by ΔCmpeak, which was often reduced by the tested blockers.

Inhibition of NSF inhibits both slow and fast endocytosis

At 4–10 min after whole-cell break-in, four NSF blockers dialyzed via the whole-cell pipette into the calyx, including ATPγS, NEM, NSFp, and SNAPp, substantially reduced the Ratedecay_n measured after depol20ms (Figures 1B–1H) or depol20msX10 (Figures 2B–2H) by more than 60%, but did not affect the calcium current amplitude (ICa; Figure S1). Consequently, these four blockers substantially prolonged the normalized, averaged capacitance decay (Figures 1B–1G and 2B–2G). These results suggest that NSF is involved in mediating both slow and fast endocytosis (Figures 1 and 2).

Ratedecay_n reduction is independent of ΔCmpeak reduction

Except for ATPγS and 0 ATP, other blockers reduced ΔCmpeak to a value >60% of control (Figures 1B–1H and 2B–2H). The extent of reduction in ΔCmpeak is in the range, although on the lower side, of reported EPSC reduction by NSF inhibition in squid giant synapses and drosophila synapses.2,3,4 This difference might be due to differences in the stimulation protocol (depol20ms vs. action potential), exocytosis detection methods (ΔCm vs. EPSC recordings), methods used to inhibit NSF, and the synapse under investigation.

A series of studies in the last two decades showed that calcium influx, but not the amount of exocytosis determined the rate of endocytosis, and a decrease in exocytosis alone does not slow down endocytosis.8,9,10,12,13 When a large amount of exocytosis saturates the endocytic capacity, a reduction of exocytosis will be accompanied by a decrease of endocytosis τ or an increased endocytosis rate.8,14,15,16,17 Thus, the decreased Ratedecay_n by NSF inhibition is not caused by the reduction of exocytosis itself, but by inhibition of endocytosis. Three sets of evidence below further support this suggestion. First, Ratedecay_n was normalized to the ΔCmpeak, which normalized the contribution of the ΔCmpeak decrease on Ratedecay. Second, ATPγS blocked endocytosis, but not ΔCmpeak or ICa within 4–10 min after break-in (Figures 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, and S1), further confirming that endocytosis block can be independent of the ΔCmpeak. At later dialysis time points, ATPγS reduced ΔCmpeak and ICa. We did not analyze these data because the ICa decrease may complicate analysis of the Ratedecay_n.9 Third, at 2–4 min after whole-cell break-in, during which the exocytosis block was minimal, NSFp and SNAPp did not decrease the ΔCmpeak, but still significantly reduced the Ratedecay_n induced by depol20ms (Figures S2A–S2C) or depol20msX10 (Figures S2D–S2F).

NSF and its SNARE disassembly activity are required for endocytosis at hippocampal synapses

The specificity of pharmacological blockers is a common concern in pharmacology experiments. We addressed this concern by (1) using four different NSF blockers in the calyx of Held, all of which generate the consensus inhibition of slow and fast endocytosis (Figures 1 and 2) and (2) knocking out or knocking down NSF genes as described below.

NSF conditional knockout mouse generation and gene deletion in culture synapses

To block NSF specifically, we generated NSF conditional knockout (NSFLoxP/LoxP) mice by floxing NSF exon 6 and exon 7 (Figure S3). In hippocampal neurons cultured from NSFLoxP/LoxP mice, we deleted NSF by treating the culture with Cre-4-OHT or by Cre transfection (with mCherry for recognition).18 Western blot showed that Cre-4-OHT treatment progressively reduced NSF to below 20% in 8 days, but does not affect other endocytic proteins (dynamin, clathrin, and adaptor protein 2) (Figures 3A, 3B, and S4). Similar reduction was obtained at 8 days after Cre transfection, as detected with immunostaining (Figure S5). Since these two methods resulted in similar NSF reduction, we grouped them together as the NSF−/− culture, and their corresponding data were grouped accordingly.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NSF knockout inhibits endocytosis at hippocampal synapses

(A) Sampled western blot of NSF, clathrin heavy chain (CHC), adaptor protein 2 α subunit (AP2), dynamin 1 (Dyn 1), and β-actin at day 0, day 4, and day 8 after Cre-4-OHT treatment to the NSFLoxP/LoxP hippocampal culture.

(B) NSF intensity (mean + s.e.m.; 8 cultures) measured by western blot at days 0, 4, and 8 after Cre-4-OHT treatment in NSFLoxP/LoxP hippocampal cultures. All data are normalized to NSF intensity at day 0. Each circle represents a single culture.

(C) Averaged traces of SypH fluorescence (FSypH) changes induced by Train20Hz in control (Ctrl, black, 20 experiments), NSF−/− hippocampal boutons (red, 19 experiments), and NSF−/− boutons overexpressed with wild-type NSF (NSF−/− + NSF; blue; containing EBFP2 for recognition, 23 experiments) at 22°C–24°C. All data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. every 6 s (applies also to E, F, H, and J). Short bars under traces indicate the stimulation (applies also to E, F, H, and J). Traces are also normalized to control and overlapped to show the block of the FSypH decay (right, Avg/Norm). Short black bars under traces indicate the stimulation (applies also to E, F, H, and J). Vertical scale bar, 50%, applies to the first three columns in (C); horizontal scale bar, 50 s, applies to all traces in (C).

(D) Ratedecay_n (upper) and ΔF/F (lower) of SypH fluorescence (FSypH) shown in C (Ctrl, NSF−/−, and NSF−/− + NSF). All data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle represents an experiment (applies also to G, I, and K). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test).

(E and F) The traces of FSypH changes induced by a 10 s AP train at 5 Hz (E) or 40 Hz (F) in control (5 Hz: 11 experiments; 40 Hz: 11 experiments; black) and in NSF−/− hippocampal boutons (5 Hz: 10 experiments; 40 Hz: 10 experiments; red) at 22°C–24°C. Traces are also normalized to control and overlapped to show the block of the FSypH decay (right). Vertical scale bars, 50%, apply to the left and middle columns in (E) and (F); horizontal scale bars, 50 s, apply to all traces in (E) and (F).

(G) Ratedecay_n (upper) and ΔF/F (lower) of FSypH shown in (E) and (F). Data from (D) (AP20Hz) also included for comparison. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test).

(H and I) The traces (H), Ratedecay_n (I), and ΔF/F (I) of FSypH changes induced by Train20Hz in control (Ctrl, black, 19 experiments) and NSF−/− hippocampal boutons (red, 9 experiments) at 34°C–37°C. Traces are also normalized and overlapped to show the block of the FSypH decay (H, right). Vertical scale bar, 50%, applies to the left and middle columns in (H); horizontal scale bar, 50 s, applies to all traces in (H). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test).

(J and K) The traces (J), Ratedecay_n (K), and ΔF/F (K) of FSypH changes induced by Train20Hz in wild-type cultures expressed with wild-type NSF (+NSF, black, 14 experiments) or NSFE329Q (+NSFE329Q, 8 experiments) at 22°C–24°C. Traces are also normalized to control and overlapped to show the block of the FSypH decay (J, Avg/Norm, right). Vertical scale bar, 50%, applies to the left and middle columns in (J); horizontal scale bar, 50 s, applies to all traces in (J). ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test). See also Figures S3–S5.

Synapto-pHluorin imaging of endocytosis

To record endocytosis, we transfected pH-sensitive synapto-pHluorin (SypH) to the NSF−/− hippocampal culture and imaged SypH fluorescence (FSypH) from boutons at room temperature (22°C–24°C), if not mentioned otherwise.12,14 A train of action potential stimulation at 20 Hz for 10 s (AP20Hz) induced a FSypH increase and decrease, reflecting exocytosis and endocytosis, respectively (Figure 3C). In control (NSFLoxP/LoxP culture), the peak FSypH increase over the baseline (ΔF/F) is 161.0 ± 23.4% (Figure 3D); FSypH decay is mono-exponential with an initial decay rate (Ratedecay_n) of 3.9 ± 0.2%/s (n = 20 experiments, each experiment contained ∼10–30 boutons; Figure 3D), where the rate was normalized to ΔF/F.

In NSF−/− cultures, ΔF/F induced by AP20Hz decreased ΔF/F to ∼60% of control, and reduced Ratedecay_n to about 25% of control (Figures 2C and 2D; n = 19 experiments). Both ΔF/F and Ratedecay_n were rescued to the control level by transfection of WT NSF to the NSF−/− culture (Figures 3C and 3D; 20 experiments). These results suggest that NSF is required for mediating endocytosis after 20 Hz nerve firing.

Similar inhibition of both ΔF/F and Ratedecay_n was observed after 5 or 40 Hz action potential stimulation for 10 s (Figures 3E–3G), or AP20Hz at physiological temperature (34°C–37°C; Figures 3H–3I). These results suggest that NSF is required for endocytosis regardless of the stimulation frequency and temperature.

ATP hydrolysis is required for endocytosis

The ATPase NSF hydrolyses ATP to disassemble the SNARE complex, which was blocked by the NSF E329Q mutant (NSFE329Q).19,20 To determine whether NSF’s ATPase function in disassembling the SNARE complex is needed for endocytosis, we first overexpressed NSFE329Q in the NSF−/− culture, but found that imaging was not possible because most neurons were dead for an unknown reason. We then overexpressed either NSF (used as the control) or NSFE329Q in wild-type hippocampal neurons. We found that AP20Hz-induced Ratedecay_n was ∼3.3%/s with NSF transfection (control), but was reduced to ∼44% of control with NSFE329Q transfection (Figures 3J and 3K), suggesting that ATPase-mediated SNARE complex disassembly is required for endocytosis at hippocampal synapses.

NSF involvement in bulk endocytosis at hippocampal synapses observed with EM

We performed EM to examine the ultrastructural changes in NSF−/− hippocampal cultures at physiological temperature. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP, 5 mg/mL) was added in bath for assay of vesicular uptake. At rest, HRP-positive [HRP(+)] vesicles were minimal; most vesicles were HRP-negative [HRP(−)] (Figure 4A); the number of HRP(+) vesicles in boutons was similar in Ctrl and NSF−/− cultures. To examine endocytosis, we applied 90 mM KCl with HRP for 1.5 min, and fixed samples at 0, 3, and 10 min after KCl/HRP application. In Ctrl boutons, compared with the resting condition, HRP(+) vesicles increased from time 0 to 10 min after KCl, reflecting vesicle endocytosis (Figures 4A and 4B) as previously shown.21,22 Compared with Ctrl boutons, HRP(+) vesicles were significantly reduced at each time point after KCl application in NSF−/− boutons (Figures 4A and 4B), suggesting inhibition of endocytosis of regular vesicles.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

NSF knockout affects endocytosis examined with EM at hippocampal synapses

(A) EM images of WT and NSF−/− hippocampal boutons at rest (Rest) and at 0 min (KCl), 3 min, and 10 min after 1.5 min 90 mM KCl application. For Rest, HRP was included for 1.5 min; for KCl application, HRP was included only during KCl application (see labels). ∗: an HRP(+) bulk endosome; arrow: an HRP(+) vesicle. Horizontal scale bar (200 nm) applies to all images in (A).

(B and C) Number of HRP(+) vesicles (B) and the bulk endosome area (C) per square micrometer of synaptic cross-section are plotted versus the time before (Rest) and at 0 min (KCl), 3 min, and 10 min after the end of KCl application in WT and NSF−/− hippocampal cultures. Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each group comprised 120–122 synaptic profiles from 18 mice (3 male and 3 female mice per experiment, 3 independent experiments). The temperature before fixation was 37°C. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (t test). Each circle represents one synaptic profile. See also Figures S3 and S5.

In Ctrl boutons, we observed HRP(+) bulk endosomes (Figure 4A), defined as vesicles with a diameter 80 nm or with a cross-section area more than that of an 80 nm vesicle (∼0.005 μm2). Bulk endosome area increased at time 0, then decreased at 3 and 10 min (Figures 4A–4C), suggesting generation of bulk endosomes and subsequent conversion to vesicles as previously shown.10,21 Similar trends were observed in NSF−/− cultures, but at a significantly lower level (Figures 4A–4C), suggesting inhibition of bulk endocytosis. Thus, EM results reveal the involvement of NSF in regular vesicle endocytosis and bulk endocytosis at hippocampal synapses.

NSF is essential for pore closure of preformed and fusion-generated Ω-profiles in chromaffin cells

We showed NSF involvement in slow, fast, and bulk endocytosis at synapses (Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4). Since these different endocytic modes are mediated primarily by the pore closure of preformed Ω-profiles (pre-Ω, formed before depolarization) and fusion-generated Ω-profiles (fs-Ω) in chromaffin cells,23,24,25 we determined whether NSF involvement in endocytosis is due to its role in closing pre-Ω and fs-Ω’s pore in chromaffin cells in the following.

Methods for imaging pre-Ω and fs-Ω pore closure

We have developed imaging methods to detect pre-Ω (Figure 5) and fs-Ω (Figure 6) pore closure in live adrenal chromaffin cells.23,24,25,26,27 Pre-Ω (∼200–1,500 nm in diameter; Figure 5B) could be generated from (1) the endocytic flat-to-Ω-shape transition, including bulk endocytosis that produces vesicles larger than fusing vesicles25,28 and (2) dense-core vesicle fusion, some of which could maintain the Ω-shape for a long time.25 Fs-Ω is from fusion of dense-core vesicles24 with a diameter of ∼360 nm (range: 200–700 nm, Figure 6A).29,30 We used mNeonGreen attached to phospholipase C δPH domain (PHG, overexpressed, binds to PI(4,5)P2) to label the plasma membrane (PM), Atto 655 (A655, 30 μM in bath; or Atto 532) to fill Ω-profiles, and fluorescent false neurotransmitter FFN511 (or FFN206) pre-loaded into vesicles to measure release (Figures 5B, 6A, and S6).18,25 At the bottom plasma membrane of resting cells, XY-plane confocal microscopy observed FFN511-containing vesicle spots and preformed PHG spots and rings overlapped with A655, but not FFN511 spots (termed pre-spot; Figures 5B and S6). Pre-spots were mostly pre-Ω as observed at the XZ-plane with confocal or stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy (e.g., Figure S6, for detail, see Shin et al.25).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

NSF is essential for mediating pre-Ω pore closure in chromaffin cells

(A) Upper: setup drawing. The cell membrane, bath, and vesicles are labeled with PHG (green), A655 (red), and FFN511 (blue), respectively. ICa and Cm are recorded via a whole-cell pipette. Lower: Sampled ICa (left) and Cm (right) changes induced by depol1s (gray arrowhead). Left: vertical scale bar, 300 pA; horizontal scale bar, 500 ms. Right: vertical scale bar, 300 fF; horizontal scale bar, 20 s.

(B) PHG fluorescence (FPH), A655 fluorescence (F655) and sampled confocal images showing depol1s-induced rapid (left), slow (middle) or large-size (right) pre-spot pore closure (pre-close) in chromaffin cells. FPH and F655 were normalized to the baseline. Labels for two y axes apply to the other images in (B). Gray arrowheads indicate a 1-s stimulation. Schematic cartoons in the bottom image illustrate the process of vesicle closure. Upper horizontal scale bars, 10 s; lower vertical scale bars, 500 nm.

(C) FPH, F655, and sampled confocal images showing a pre-spot without undergoing pore closure after depol1s in a chromaffin cell (no pre-close). FPH and F655 were normalized to the baseline. Gray arrowhead indicates a 1-s stimulation. Upper horizontal scale bar, 10 s; lower vertical scale bar, 500 nm.

(D) Western blot of NSF, clathrin heavy chain (CHC), dynamin 2 (Dyn 2), and β-actin in chromaffin cell cultures transfected with si-Ctrl or si-NSF.

(E) The probability of pre-spots undergoing pre-close after depol1s (Probpre-close) in control (Ctrl, 25 cells), si-NSF transfection (22 cells), si-NSF transfection plus wild-type NSF overexpression (si-NSF+NSF, 15 cells), control cells overexpressed with wild-type NSF (+NSF, 22 cells), or control cells overexpressed with NSFE329Q (+NSFE329Q, 24 cells). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle presents the data from a cell. ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test, compared to control). See also Figures S6 and S7.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

NSF in mediating fusion (fs-Ω) pore closure and facilitating content release in chromaffin cells

(A) PHG fluorescence (FPH, green), A655 fluorescence (F655, red), FFN511 fluorescence (FFFN, blue), and confocal images showing close- (left), stay- (middle) and shrink-fusion (right). Labels for three y axes apply to the other images in (A). Gray arrowheads indicate a 1-s stimulation. Schematic cartoons in the bottom image illustrate the process of vesicle fusion. Upper horizontal scale bars, 10 s. Lower vertical scale bars, 500 nm.

(B) The probability for a fusion spot to undergo close-fusion (Probclose-fusion) measured after depol1s in control (Ctrl, 25 cells), cells transfected with si-NSF (22 cells), cells transfected with si-NSF transfection plus wild-type NSF overexpression (si-NSF+NSF, 15 cells), control cells overexpressed with wild-type NSF (+NSF, 22 cells), or control cells overexpressed with NSFE329Q (+NSFE329Q, 24 cells). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle represents data from a cell. ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test, compared to control).

(C) Averaged FFN511 spot fluorescence (FFFN) decay due to fusion in three groups: control (Ctrl, 20 fusion events from 4 cells), si-NSF (20 fusion events from 4 cells), and si-NSF+NSF (19 fusion events from 4 cells). Horizontal scale bar, 3 s.

(D) Averaged FFN511 spot fluorescence (FFFN) decay due to fusion in control cells overexpressing wild-type NSF (+NSF, 20 fusion events from 4 cells) or overexpressing NSFE329Q (+NSFE329Q, 24 fusion events from 4 cells). Horizontal scale bar, 3 s.

(E) The 20%–80% decay time (TFFN) of FFFN (indicating release time) in Ctrl (25 cells), si-NSF (22 cells), si-NSF+NSF (15 cells), +NSF (22 cells), +NSFE329Q (24 cells). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. Each circle represents data from a cell. ∗∗p < 0.01 (t test, compared to control). See also Figures S6 and S7.

A whole-cell 1-s depolarization (−80 to +10 mV, depol1s) induced ICa, capacitance changes reflecting exo-endocytosis (Figure 5A), pre-spot closure (pre-close; Figure 5B), and fusion spots observed with confocal microscopy (Figure 6A; cell-bottom, XY-plane imaging every 40–80 ms).23,24,25 Pre-close was detected as A655 fluorescence (F655, strongly excited) dimming while PHG fluorescence (FPH, weakly excited) sustained or dimmed with a delay (Figure 5B, see Figure 5C for a pre-spot without undergoing pore closure).25 This method detected pore closure of pre-Ω that was impermeable to H+ and OH−, mediated by dynamin, and observed directly with STED imaging.23,24,25,26 Pre-Ω closure forms ∼200–1,500 nm vesicles,25 with ∼17% in the 600–1,500 nm range (e.g., Figure 5B, right) that can be attributed to bulk endocytosis.25

Fusion spots were detected as a sudden appearance of PHG and A655 spots while FFN511 spot fluorescence (FFFN) decayed, due to the diffusion of PHG/A655 from the PM/bath to the fs-Ω and release of FFN511 from the fs-Ω (Figure 6A). Three fusion modes were observed (see “STAR Methods” for more detail): (1) close-fusion (kiss-and-run)—fs-Ω pore closure was detected similarly to pre-close: as F655 dimming while FPH was sustained or decayed later (Figure 6A, left)23,24,25,26; (2) stay-fusion—a sustained fs-Ω was detected as persistent PHG/A655 spots with sustained F655 and FPH (Figure 6A, middle); (3) shrink-fusion—fs-Ω shrinking was detected as parallel decreases of spot-size with F655 and FPH (Figure 6A, right).24,26,31 STED imaging directly observed these modes (for detail, see Shin et al.24,31).

NSF and its ATPase activity are required for pre-Ω and fs-Ω pore closure

NSF siRNA (si-NSF) transfection substantially reduced NSF without affecting key endocytic protein dynamin and clathrin (Figures 5D and S7). si-NSF substantially reduced the probability of pre-spots to undergo pre-close (pore closure) induced by depol1s (Probpre-close; Figure 5E) and the probability of fusion spots to undergo close-fusion (Probclose-fusion; Figure 6B), but increased the FFN511 20%–80% decay time that reflects the release time course (TFFN-release time; Figures 6C–6E). NSF overexpression in si-NSF-transfected cells rescued pre-close (Figure 5E), close-fusion (Figure 6B), and TFFN (Figures 6C–6E) to the control level. These results suggest that NSF is required for pre-close and close-fusion, and controls the time course of vesicular content release.

Overexpression of NSFE329Q, a mutant unable to disassemble SNARE complexes,19,20 reduced Probpre-close (Figure 5E) and Probclose-fusion (Figure 6B) measured after depol1s, but increased TFFN (Figures 6D and 6E), suggesting that SNARE disassembly by NSF is required for closing both pre-Ω and fs-Ω’s pore, and controlling content release time course.

NSF mediates slow, fast, ultrafast, and overshoot endocytosis by closing pre-Ω/fs-Ω’s pore in chromaffin cells

Since endocytosis in chromaffin cells is primarily due to pre-Ω/fs-Ω’s pore closure rather than the endocytic transformation,18,25 our finding of NSF involvement in pre-Ω/fs-Ω pore closure predicts NSF involvement in endocytosis. We verified this prediction by examining how inhibition of NSF affects depol1s-induced capacitance decay (after the jump) that reflects endocytosis. The following two sets of results suggest that NSF and its SNARE-disassembly function are required for endocytosis in chromaffin cells. First, si-NSF transfection inhibited the Cm-decay-indicated endocytosis, but not ICa; and the inhibition was rescued by overexpression of wild-type NSF (Figure 7A). Second, overexpression of NSFE329Q inhibited the Cm-decay-indicated endocytosis as compared to overexpression of wild-type NSF (Figure 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

NSF is essential for mediating slow, fast, ultrafast, and overshoot endocytosis in chromaffin cells

(A) Depol1s-induced ICa (upper) and Cm (lower) in chromaffin cells under control (Ctrl, black, 25 cells), si-NSF transfection (si-NSF, red, 22 cells), and si-NSF transfection plus wild-type NSF overexpression (si-NSF+NSF, blue, 15 cells). Data are expressed as mean + s.e.m. at intervals of 0.1 s (ICa) or 4 s (Cm); gray arrowheads indicate a 1-s stimulation (applies to all other images in this figure). Traces are also merged on the right for comparison. Upper: vertical scale bar, 300 pA; horizontal scale bar, 400 ms. Lower: vertical scale bar, 500 fF; horizontal scale bar, 10 s. The scale bars apply to all images in (A).

(B) Depol1s-induced ICa (upper) and Cm (lower) in chromaffin cells overexpressed with wild-type NSF (+NSF, black, 22 cells) or NSFE329Q (+NSFE329Q, red, 24 cells). Traces are also merged in the right. Upper: vertical scale bar, 300 pA; horizontal scale bar, 400 ms. Lower: vertical scale bar, 500 fF; horizontal scale bar, 10 s. The scale bars apply to all images in (B).

(C) Mean ICa (upper) and Cm (lower) induced by depol1s in five groups of chromaffin cells (from left to right): Groupno-endo (decay <30% ΔCm, 6 cells), Groupslow (endocytic τ > 6 s, 6 cells), Groupfast (τ: 0.6–6 s, 5 cells), Groupultrafast (τ < 0.6 s, 4 cells) and Groupovershoot (decay >130% ΔCm, 4 cells) in control chromaffin cells. Upper: vertical scale bar, 400 pA; horizontal scale bar, 500 ms. Lower: vertical scale bar, 500 fF; horizontal scale bar, 10 s. The scale bars apply to all images in (C).

(D and E) Depol1s-induced ICa (upper) and Cm (lower) in chromaffin cells with ICa of 160–360 pA (left), 400–900 pA (middle), and 1,000–1,800 pA (right) in two conditions: (D) si-NSF transfection (left: 8 cells; middle: 7 cells; right: 7 cells); (E) NSFE329Q overexpression (left: 9 cells; middle: 8 cells; right: 7 cells). Upper: vertical scale bars, 400 pA; horizontal scale bars, 500 ms. Lower: vertical scale bars, 300 fF; horizontal scale bars, 20 s. The scale bars apply to all images in (D) and (E).

To determine which mode(s) of endocytosis NSF is involved in, we first described five distinct modes of endocytosis with different time constants and amplitudes as recently characterized systematically in chromaffin cells.18,25 Five modes of endocytosis were revealed when chromaffin cells were divided into five groups based on the decay of the whole-cell capacitance (Cm) after the jump induced by depol1s: (1) no-endocytosis (Groupno-endo, decay < 30% ΔCm), (2) slow endocytosis (Groupslow, endocytic τ > 6 s), (3) fast endocytosis (Groupfast, τ: 0.6–6 s), (4) ultrafast endocytosis (Groupultrafast, τ < 0.6 s), and 5) overshoot endocytosis (Groupovershoot, decay > 130% ΔCm; Figure 7C; see Shin et al.25 for detail). Calcium influx triggers endocytosis in each of these five groups: larger ICa induces faster and larger amplitude of endocytosis (Figure 7C), whereas strontium abolishes endocytosis (see Shin et al.25 for detail).

si-NSF transfection or NSFE329Q overexpression inhibited the Cm-decay-indicated endocytosis in all three cell groups divided based on the ICa amplitude (Figures 7D and 7E), indicating inhibition of endocytosis throughout the entire ICa range that generates five distinct endocytic modes in control (Figure 7C). These results suggest that NSF and its SNARE complex disassembly function are required to drive slow, fast, ultrafast, and overshoot endocytosis observed in control. We concluded that NSF and its SNARE complex disassembly function contribute to mediating diverse modes of endocytosis by participating in closing the pre-Ω and fs-Ω’s pore.

Discussion

While finding the involvement of the core “exocytosis” protein NSF in endocytosis is apparently surprising, it is consistent with a series of studies showing that other core exocytosis proteins, including SNAP-25, syntaxin, VAMP2, and synaptotagmin 1, are involved in synaptic vesicle endocytosis at calyx-type and hippocampal synapses.13,32,33,34,35,36,37 It may also provide an explanation for an early study showing that NSF inhibitors reduced the total vesicle number in squid giant nerve terminals3—the block of endocytosis reduces the vesicle supply. The dual roles of these core “exocytosis” proteins in both exo- and endocytosis suggest that they may play an important role in coupling exocytosis to endocytosis, which recycles vesicles and maintains the exocytosis capacity and membrane homeostasis of release sites.27,38

In line with its dual roles in exo- and endocytosis, we demonstrated that NSF and its SNARE-disassembly function are required to close the pore of fs-Ω (fusion pore) and pre-Ω, thereby mediating endocytosis in chromaffin cells (Figures 5 and 6). Given that pre-Ω could be generated by fusing vesicles that maintain a Ω-shape, NSF and its SNARE-disassembly function may mediate fusion pore closure and thus endocytosis via the kiss-and-run (close-fusion) and kiss-and-stay fusion (stay-fusion). Since pre-Ω could also be generated from endocytic flat-to-Ω shape transition,25,39 NSF and its SNARE-disassembly function may be required for pore closure during classical endocytic flat-to-round vesicle formation.

How is NSF involved in pore closure? A recent study shows that SNARE disassembly by NSF is essential for closing the fusion pore formed in the in vitro SNARE-reconstituted nanodisk.40 The SNARE complex formation is required to assemble a fusion pore, whereas the SNARE complex disassembly by NSF has been suggested to disassemble the fusion pore, resulting in the fusion pore closure.40 This in vitro finding offers a mechanistic explanation for why NSF and its SNARE-disassembly function are required to mediate fusion pore closure in live chromaffin cells. An alternative explanation could be that NSF-mediated SNARE disassembly may help to clear the release site,9,33,38,41 allowing for the endocytic proteins, such as dynamin23,24 and the recently found clathrin,18 to access and close the fusion pore.

This explanation seems difficult to account for the requirement of NSF and its SNARE-complex disassembly function in closing the pre-Ω’s pore. It might be possible that after fusion, the SNARE complex is sorted to the endocytic site around the pre-Ω’s pore region, which may present a physical barrier that may prevent dynamin and clathrin from accessing the pore. Disassembly of the SNARE complex at the pre-Ω by NSF might thus facilitate pre-Ω pore closure, explaining why NSF is needed for the pre-Ω pore closure. While beyond the scope of the present work, it is interesting to determine how NSF is involved in pore closure in the future.

Our findings provide an explanation for a long-standing observation that endocytosis requires energies from not only GTP hydrolysis,17,42 but also ATP hydrolysis43 —NSF hydrolyzes ATP to disassemble the SNARE complex. Through its ATPase activity that disassembles the SNARE complex, NSF (1) mediates diverse modes of endocytosis, as shown here, (2) regulates the trafficking of neurotransmitter receptors, including AMPA receptors, GABA receptors, and dopamine receptors, and (3) contributes to generating synaptic plasticity in the nervous system across different types of synapses.6 The dysfunction of NSF-mediated trafficking of these receptors or NSF mutations is associated with several neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy.6 Our finding that NSF mediates diverse endocytic modes by closing pre-Ω and fs-Ω’s pore provides a mechanistic basis accounting for these physiological and pathological roles of NSF.

Limitations of the study

NSF E329Q mutation was reported to inhibit SNARE complex disassembly.19,20 We could not exclude its potential for other non-specific effects, as we were unable to measure SNARE complex disassembly and thus verify its inhibitory role in chromaffin cells or hippocampal synapses. However, its inhibitory effect on endocytosis is consistent with the effects of peptides we used to inhibit NSF’s function in disassembling the SNARE complex in the calyx of Held (Figures 1 and 2), supporting NSF E329Q mutation in inhibiting SNARE complex disassembly.

While we have demonstrated clearly a crucial function of NSF in endocytosis via pre-Ω and fs-Ω pore closure, we have not explored its underlying mechanisms. It would be of great interest to explore underlying mechanisms in the future.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Ling-Gang Wu (wul@ninds.nih.gov).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Data and code availability

All data produced for this manuscript are available from the lead contact (wul@ninds.nih.gov) upon reasonable request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jianhua Xu for the strong support of calyx experiments, Susan Cheng and Virginia Crocker for EM technical support, Dr. Gero Miesenböck (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK) for providing us with the synapto-pHluorin plasmid, and Dr. Yongling Zhu for synaptophysin-pHluorin2X plasmid. This work was supported by NINDS Research Program (ZIA NS003009-15 and ZIA NS003105-10 to L.G.W.). The contributions of the NIH author(s) were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author contributions

L.G.W., conceptualization, supervision, writing – review and editing, and funding acquisition; X.S.W., T.S., and B.S., methodology, validation, formal analysis, visualization, and writing – original draft; X.S.W., T.S., and B.S., investigation (major experiments); Z.Z., S.L., L.W., X.W., M.M., S.H., and L.G., investigation (minor experiments); S.L., validation and formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the article.

Declaration of interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin Abcam Cat#ab6276; RRID: AB_2223210
Rabbit polyclonal anti-AP2 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#PA1-41068; RRID: AB_2115072
Rabbit polyclonal anti-CHC (Clathrin heavy chain) Abcam Cat#ab21679; RRID: AB_2083165
Mouse Monoclonal anti-dynamin 1 Cell Signaling Technology Cat#4565; RRID: AB_2093212
Rabbit Monoclonal anti-dynamin 2 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 90438; RRID: AB_3739825
Mouse monoclonal anti-NSF-1 Abcam Cat#ab16681; RRID: AB_2155806
Rabbit monoclonal anti-TAU Abcam Cat#ab32057; RRID: AB_778254

Biological samples

Bovine adrenal glands J. W. Treuth & Sons Inc. https://www.jwtreuth.com

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Atto 655 carboxy ATTO-TEC Cat#AD655-21
FFN511 Abcam Cat#ab-120331
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#P8125
Lipofectamine™ LTX Reagent with PLUS™ Reagent ThermoFisher Scientific Cat#15338030
Mutated NSF peptide (NSFmp): TGKTLIARKIETMLNAREPK 21st Century Biochemicals N/A
NSF peptide (NSFp): TGKTLIARKIGTMLNAREPK 21st Century Biochemicals N/A
SNAP peptide (SNAPp): QSFFSGLFGGSSKIEEACE 21st Century Biochemicals N/A
Scrambled SNAP peptide (SNAPsp): GFAESLFQSIEKESGFSCG 21st Century Biochemicals N/A
Tetrodotoxin (TTX) Tocris Cat#1078

Critical commercial assays

Elite ABC-HRP kit Vector Labs Cat#PK-6100
Basic NucleofectorTM Kit for primary mammalian neurons Lonza Cat#VPI-1003
Quick extract DNA extraction solution Lucigen Cat#QE09050

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Mouse: C57BL/6J Jackson Laboratory Cat#000664; RRID:IMSR_JAX: 000664
Mouse: NSFLoxP Lin Gan’s lab (This paper) N/A
Rat: Wistar Charles River Laboratories Cat#003

Oligonucleotides

MISSION® esiRNA (siRNA NSF) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#EHU051331
MISSION® siRNA Fluorescent Universal Negative Control #1, Cyanine 3 (si-Control) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#SIC003

Recombinant DNA

Plasmid: cDNA NSF (Mouse) NovoPro N/A
Plasmid: cDNA NSFE329Q (Mouse) Genecopoeia N/A
Plasmid: pH-sensitive pHluorin 2X (SypH) Yong-Ling Zhu’s lab (Zhu et al.44) N/A

Software and algorithms

Igor Pro 6.1.2.1 WaveMetrics, Inc. https://www.wavemetrics.com
Image J National Institutes of Health https://imagej.net/
NIS-Elements AR 4.1 Nikon NIS-Elements | Software | Microscope Products | Nikon Instruments Inc.
Pulse v8.67 HEKA Elektronik https://www.heka.com

Other

EPC-10 Amplifier HEKA Elektronik RRID: SCR_018399
German glass coverslips with mouse laminin coating over PDL layer Neuvitro Cat#GG-25-Laminin
Integraslice 7550 Vibratome Campden Instruments https://www.campdeninstruments.com
JEOL200CX transmission electron microscope JEOL https://www.jeolusa.com
Nikon Eclipse A1 confocal microscope Nikon https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com

Experimental model and study participant details

Animal care and use

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and were approved by the NIH Animal Care and Use Committee (NINDS ASP-1170 and ASP-1259). Wistar rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories, and wild-type C57BL/6J mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. NSFloxP mice were generated by Dr. Lin Gan and described in Figure S3. NSFloxP/loxP mice of either sex were obtained by heterozygous and homozygous breeding using standard mouse husbandry procedures. Mouse genotypes were determined by PCR. Rats and mice were housed under controlled environmental conditions: temperature 70–74°F, humidity 35–60%, with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (light: 6 AM–6 PM, dark: 6 PM–6 AM).

Fresh bovine adrenal glands, obtained from male and female bovines aged 21–27 months, were purchased from J. W. Treuth & Sons, Inc.

P7–10 rats of either sex were used for the preparation of brainstem slices. P0 mice of either sex were used for hippocampal culture experiments. The adrenal glands were used for chromaffin cell culture experiments.

Method details

Slice preparation, capacitance recordings and solutions

Slice preparation and capacitance recordings were similar as previously described.9,15,45,46,47 Briefly, parasagittal brainstem slices (200 μm thick) containing the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body were prepared from 7–10-day-old male or female Wistar rats using a vibratome. Whole-cell membrane capacitance measurements were performed using an EPC-10 amplifier in combination with a software lock-in amplifier (PULSE; HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) implementing the Lindau-Neher technique. The frequency of the sinusoidal stimulus was 1,000 Hz, and the peak-to-peak voltage of the sine wave was ≤ 50 mV. We pharmacologically isolated presynaptic Ca2+ currents with a bath solution (∼22–24°C) containing (in mM): 105 NaCl, 20 TEA-Cl, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 glucose, 0.4 ascorbic acid, 3 myo-inositol, 2 sodium pyruvate, 0.001 tetrodotoxin (TTX), 0.1 3,4-diaminopyridine, 300–310 mOsm, pH 7.4 when bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The presynaptic pipette contained (in mM): 125 Cs-gluconate, 20 CsCl, 4 MgATP, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine, 0.3 GTP, 10 HEPES, 0.05 BAPTA, 310–320 mOsm, pH 7.2, adjusted with CsOH.

NSF peptide (TGKTLIARKIGTMLNAREPK), mutated NSF peptide (TGKTLIARKIETMLNAREPK), SNAP peptide (QSFFSGLFGGSSKIEEACE), scrambled SNAP peptide (GFAESLFQSIEKESGFSCG) were purchased from the 21st Century Biochemicals, Inc. (Marlboro, MA, USA).

Measurements of the time constant, Ratedecay and Ratedecay_n in calyces

The τ was measured from exponential fit of Igor (Figures 1B and 2B). Ratedecay at calyces was measured between 0.5–4 s after depol20ms that induced slow endocytosis, but between 0.5–1.5 s after depol20msX10 that induced rapid endocytosis.9,10,11 Ratedecay_n was measured as Ratedecay divided by the capacitance jump peak amplitude (ΔCmpeak). We used depol20msX10 to induce rapid endocytosis, because the Ratedecay after depol20msX10 reflected mostly (∼80%) the rapid component of endocytosis.9,10,12

Mouse hippocampal culture and transfection

Mouse hippocampal culture was prepared as described previously.10,48 Hippocampal CA1-CA3 regions were dissected from P0–P1 wild-type or NSFLoxp/Loxp mice of either sex, dissociated, and plated on Poly-D-lysine. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator in a medium containing MEM, 0.5% glucose, 0.1 g/l bovine transferrin, 0.3 g/l glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum, 2% B-27, and 3 μM cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside. On 6–8 days after plating, neurons were transfected with plasmids using Lipofectamine LTX. Neurons were then maintained at 37°C for an additional 2 days before imaging.

Transfected plasmids included a plasmid containing synaptophysin-pHluroin (SypH) gifted by Dr. Yongling Zhu44 alone (control) or with a L309 plasmid containing Cre/mCherry. A nuclear localization sequence was tagged at the N-terminal of Cre, and cloned into L309 vector via BamHI and EcoRI sites. Accordingly, mCherry was expressed in the nucleus. For the rescue experiments (see Figure 2), we transfected cDNA NSF plasmid (Novopro) along with SypH and Cre/mCherry. The cDNA encoding NSF was subcloned into EBFP2-C1 (Addgene #54665), and EBFP2 was used for us to recognize transfected cells.

The cDNA encoding NSFE329Q (Genecopoeia) was subcloned into EBFP2-C1 (Addgene #54665) and EBFP2 was used for us to recognize transfected cells. For the rescue experiments, we transfected NSF plasmid along with SypH and NSFE329Q.

Immunohistochemistry in hippocampal cultures

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100, and subsequently incubated with primary and secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 10% donkey serum and incubated with cells at 4oC overnight. After several rinses in PBS, cells were incubated with fluorescence-conjugated donkey anti-mouse, anti-sheep, or anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen) for 1 h at 22–24oC. Primary antibodies included mouse anti-NSF (1:200, Abcam) and anti-TAU (1:200, Abcam). Imaging was similar to SypH imaging. mCherry fluorescence imaging was performed simultaneously to identify cells transfected with Cre/mCherry.

SynaptopHluorin imaging in hippocampal neurons

Action potentials were evoked by multiple 1-ms pulses (20 mA) delivered at different frequencies through a platinum electrode. The bath solution contained (in mM): 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 25 HEPES (buffered to pH 7.4), 30 glucose, 0.01 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX), and 0.05 D, L-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid. We heated the culture chamber using a temperature controller (TC344B, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT). Imaging was performed after the culture was at 34–37°C for 15–30 min. The temperature was verified with another small thermometer (BAT-7001H, Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ) in the chamber. SypH images were acquired at 10 Hz using Nikon A1 confocal microscope (Objective: 60×, 1.4 NA), and analyzed with Nikon software. All boutons showing fluorescence increases were analyzed (region of interest: 2 × 2 μm). Each data group was obtained from at least three batches of cultures.

Electron microscope images, data collection and analysis of hippocampal neurons

Hippocampal cultures were fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde (freshly prepared, Electron microscopy sciences, Hatfield, PA) in 0.1 M Na-cacodylate buffer solution containing for at least 1 h at 22–24°C and stored in 4°C refrigerator overnight. The next day, cultures were washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and treated with 1% OsO4 in cacodylate buffer for 1 h on ice, and 0.25% uranyl acetate in acetate buffer at pH 5.0 overnight at 4°C, dehydrated with ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin. Thin sections were counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate then examined in a JEOL200CX TEM. Images were collected with a CCD digital camera system (XR-100; AMT) at a primary magnification of 10,000–20,000×. Synapses were selected based on the structural specialization including synaptic vesicle clustering, synaptic cleft and the postsynaptic density.

Chromaffin cell culture and transfection

The primary bovine adrenal chromaffin cell culture has been described previously.23,26,49 We purchased fresh adrenal glands (from 21–27 months old bovines of either sex) from a local slaughterhouse (J. W. Treuth & Sons Inc., 328 Oella Ave, Catonsville, MD 21228; web site: https://www.jwtreuth.com). The glands were immersed in pre-chilled Locke’s buffer on ice for transportation to the lab. The Locke’s buffer contained (mM): NaCl, 145; KCl, 5.4; Na2HPO4, 2.2; NaH2PO4, 0.9; glucose, 5.6; HEPES, 10 (pH 7.3, adjusted with NaOH). The glands were perfused with Locke’s buffer, then infused with Locke’s buffer containing collagenase P (1.5 mg/ml, Roche), trypsin inhibitor (0.325 mg/ml, Sigma) and bovine serum albumin (5 mg/ml, Sigma), and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The digested medulla was minced in Locke’s buffer, and filtered through a 100 nm nylon mesh. The filtrate was centrifuged (48 × g, 5 min), re-suspended in Locke’s buffer and re-centrifuged until the supernatant was clear. The final cell pellet was re-suspended in pre-warmed DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco).

Cells were transfected by electroporation using Basic Primary Neurons Nucleofector Kit (Lonza), according to the manufacturer’s protocol and plated onto poly-L-lysine (0.005 % w/v, Sigma) and laminin (4 μg/ml, Sigma) coated glass coverslips (Neuvitro). The cells were incubated at 37°C with 9% CO2 and used within 48 h.49

Fluorescent dyes and plasmids for chromaffin cells

For FFN511 (Abcam) imaging, cells were bathed with FFN511 (5–10 μM) in 37°C incubator for 20 min and images were performed after washing out FFN511 in the bath solution. Atto 655 (A655, Sigma) was included in the bath solution at the concentration of 30 μM. PH-EGFP (phospholipase C delta PH domain attached with EGFP) was obtained from Dr. Tamas Balla. PH-mNeonGreen (PHG) was created by replacing the EGFP tag of PH-EGFP with mNeonGreen (Allele Biotechnology).49

For knockdown of endogenous NSF in bovine chromaffin cells, a siRNA duplex for bovine NSF (5′- CCAGAUUGUCGAUGUGUUU-3′) labeled with cyanine 3 (si-NSF) and scrambled control siRNA (si-Ctrl) labeled with cyanine 3 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. For rescue experiments, si-NSF and a plasmid containing wild-type NSF and mCherry (for recognition of the transfected cell) (Addgene #84334) were transfected into chromaffin cells. The cDNA encoding NSFE329Q (Genecopoeia) was subcloned into EBFP2-C1 (Addgene #54665), where EBFP2 was used to recognize transfected cells.

Western blot

Total protein was extracted from cultured chromaffin cells or hippocampal cultures using RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Millipore Sigma). Equal amounts of proteins, determined by BCA protein assay (Invitrogen) were loaded onto 4%–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membrane and immunoblotted with the indicated primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Membranes were incubated with HRP-labeled secondary antibodies at 22–24oC for 2 h and visualized using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System. Primary antibodies included anti-NSF (1:2000, Abcam), mouse anti-CHC (1:500, Abcam), rabbit anti-dynamin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti-AP2 (1:1000, ThermoFisher Scientific), and β-actin (1:3000; Abcam).

Electrophysiological recording at chromaffin cells

The method has been described before.23,26,49 At room temperature (20–22°C), whole-cell voltage-clamp and capacitance recordings were performed with an EPC-10 amplifier together with the software lock-in amplifier (PULSE 8.74, HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany). The holding potential was –80 mV. For capacitance measurements, the frequency of the sinusoidal stimulus was 1000 Hz with a peak-to-peak voltage ≤ 50 mV. The bath solution contained (mM): 125 NaCl, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, 5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 4.5 KCl, 0.001 TTX and 20 TEA, pH 7.3 adjusted with NaOH. The pipette (2–4 MΩ) solution contained (mM) 130 Cs-glutamate, 0.5 Cs-EGTA, 12 NaCl, 30 HEPES, 1 MgCl2, 2 ATP, and 0.5 GTP, pH 7.2 adjusted with CsOH. These solutions pharmacologically isolated calcium currents. For stimulation, we used a 1-s depolarization from the holding potential of –80 mV to +10 mV (depol1s). We used this stimulus because it induces robust exo-endocytosis as reflected in capacitance recordings. Since prolonged whole-cell recording slows down endocytosis, we limited to 1 depol1s per cell.

Confocal imaging at chromaffin cells

Imaging of PHG, FFN511, and A655 was performed with an inverted confocal microscope (TCS SP5II, Leica, Germany, 100× oil objective, numerical aperture: 1.4).25,49 PHG was excited by a tunable white light laser at 515 nm (laser power set at ∼1–4 mW); FFN511 was excited by an Argon laser at 458 nm (laser power set at ∼2–4 mW); A655 was excited by an HeNe laser at 633 nm (laser power set at ∼12–15 mW); their fluorescence was collected at 520–600 nm, 465–510 nm, and 650–800 nm, respectively. Confocal imaging area was ∼70–160 μm2 at the XY plane with a fixed Z-axis focal plane ∼100–200 nm above the cell-bottom membrane (XY/Zfix scanning). Images were collected every 40–80 ms at 40–60 nm per pixel.

Fusion modes, close-fusion and pre-close detection with confocal microscopy

Full-fusion was identified as the sudden appearance of PHG spot or ring together with the sudden appearance of an A655 spot, due to PHG and A655 diffusion from the plasma membrane (PM) and the bath into the fusion-generated Ω-profile (fs-Ω, Figure 6) at cell-bottom. FFN511 (pre-loaded in vesicles) fluorescence (FFFN) decrease concurrently at the same spot as PHG fluorescence (FPH) and A655 fluorescence (F655) increased, while measurements was made for estimation of FFN511 release rate. The fusion pore closes at ∼0.05–30 s later (close-fusion, Figure 6), maintains an open pore (stay-fusion, Figure 6), or shrinks to merge with the plasma membrane (shrink-fusion, Figure 6).24,25,31,49

Close-fusion was detected as F655 (strongly excited) dimming due to pore closure that prevented bath fluorescent A655 from exchanging with bleached A655 in vesicle, while FPH (weakly excited) sustained or decayed with a delay that reflected vesicle pinch off (Figure 6); stay-fusion was detected as sustained F655 and FPH (Figure 6); shrink-fusion was detected as parallel increases and decreases of F655 and FPH (Figure 6).

Pre-close was detected with spot F655 bleaching with constant FPH, due to fusion pore closure of pre-Ω by strong excitation (Figure 5). It is not due to a narrow pore smaller than A655 molecule size, because after spot dimming, bath application of an acid solution cannot quench the pH-sensitive VAMP2-EGFP or VAMP2-pHluorin overexpressed at the same spot, indicating that the spot is impermeable to H+ or OH-, the smallest molecules, and thus is closed.23

Quantification and statistical analysis

Data collection and quantifications

For membrane capacitance (Cm) measurements at calyces, each group of data were from 7–12 calyces, with one calyx recorded per mouse (7–12 mice of either sex). The exact numbers of calyces and mice for each experimental group are indicated in the corresponding figure legends. Cm was measured within 10 min after break-in to avoid rundown. The first 0.25 s Cm trace after stimulation was not used (and thus not shown in Figures 1 and 2) to avoid capacitance artifact contamination.9,13,46,47

In each pHluorin imaging experiment, 20–30 synaptic boutons exhibiting stimulus-evoked increases in SypH fluorescence (FSypH) were analyzed. Square regions of interest (ROIs; 2 μm × 2 μm) were manually defined over individual boutons. Approximately one to three experiments were performed per culture, with each culture prepared from 3–6 mice. Data for each experimental group were obtained from at least four independent batches of cultures (4–12 cultures). FSypH was normalized to the baseline FSypH before stimulation (baseline FSypH was normalized as 100%). Ratedecay (the initial rate of FSypH decay) was measured from FSypH in the first 4 – 10 s after stimulation.

For electron microscopy, hippocampal synapses were identified based on characteristic ultrastructural specializations, including synaptic vesicle clustering, the presence of a synaptic cleft, and postsynaptic density. Each dataset was derived from 120–122 synaptic profiles collected from 18 mice across three independent cultures.

For chromaffin cell experiments, each dataset was obtained from at least four independent primary chromaffin cell cultures. Each culture was prepared using at least three adrenal glands collected from two individual bovines. Cm and ICa were collected within the first 2 min after the break-in to avoid rundown of endocytosis and Ca2+ influx, which appear as a gradual decline in both,26,50 and were analyzed using Igor (WaveMetrics). Confocal images were analyzed with LAS X (Leica) and ImageJ. Fluorescence intensity was measured at each frame within the fluorescence spot. Cells with fewer than five fusion events were excluded to avoid biasing the dataset.

Statistical tests

Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. The number of replicates (n) is specified in the Results and figure legends, where n represents the number of cells, fusion events, or independent experiments as indicated. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests. Statistical significance is denoted as follows: p < 0.05 (∗), p < 0.01 (∗∗), and p < 0.001 (∗∗∗).

Published: March 27, 2026

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115510.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Figures S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Littleton J.T., Chapman E.R., Kreber R., Garment M.B., Carlson S.D., Ganetzky B. Temperature-sensitive paralytic mutations demonstrate that synaptic exocytosis requires SNARE complex assembly and disassembly. Neuron. 1998;21:401–413. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80549-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuner T., Li Y., Gee K.R., Bonewald L.F., Augustine G.J. Photolysis of a caged peptide reveals rapid action of N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor before neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:347–352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707197105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schweizer F.E., Dresbach T., Debello W.M., O'Connor V., Augustine G.J., Betz H. Regulation of neurotransmitter release kinetics by NSF. Science. 1998;279:1203–1206. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kawasaki F., Mattiuz A.M., Ordway R.W. Synaptic physiology and ultrastructure in comatose mutants define an in vivo role for NSF in neurotransmitter release. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:10241–10249. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.18-24-10241.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.He E., Wierda K., van Westen R., Broeke J.H., Toonen R.F., Cornelisse L.N., Verhage M. Munc13-1 and Munc18-1 together prevent NSF-dependent de-priming of synaptic vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang J., Kong L., Zou L., Liu Y. The role of synaptic protein NSF in the development and progression of neurological diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2024;18 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1395294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lledo P.M., Zhang X., Südhof T.C., Malenka R.C., Nicoll R.A. Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation. Science. 1998;279:399–403. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu W., Xu J., Wu X.S., Wu L.G. Activity-dependent acceleration of endocytosis at a central synapse. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:11676–11683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu X.S., McNeil B.D., Xu J., Fan J., Xue L., Melicoff E., Adachi R., Bai L., Wu L.G. Ca(2+) and calmodulin initiate all forms of endocytosis during depolarization at a nerve terminal. Nat. Neurosci. 2009;12:1003–1010. doi: 10.1038/nn.2355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu X.S., Lee S.H., Sheng J., Zhang Z., Zhao W.D., Wang D., Jin Y., Charnay P., Ervasti J.M., Wu L.G. Actin Is Crucial for All Kinetically Distinguishable Forms of Endocytosis at Synapses. Neuron. 2016;92:1020–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu X.S., Subramanian S., Zhang Y., Shi B., Xia J., Li T., Guo X., El-Hassar L., Szigeti-Buck K., Henao-Mejia J., et al. Presynaptic Kv3 channels are required for fast and slow endocytosis of synaptic vesicles. Neuron. 2021;109:938–946.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun T., Wu X.S., Xu J., McNeil B.D., Pang Z.P., Yang W., Bai L., Qadri S., Molkentin J.D., Yue D.T., et al. The role of calcium/calmodulin-activated calcineurin in rapid and slow endocytosis at central synapses. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:11838–11847. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1481-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu J., Luo F., Zhang Z., Xue L., Wu X.S., Chiang H.C., Shin W., Wu L.G. SNARE proteins synaptobrevin, SNAP-25, and syntaxin are involved in rapid and slow endocytosis at synapses. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1414–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sankaranarayanan S., Ryan T.A. Real-time measurements of vesicle-SNARE recycling in synapses of the central nervous system. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:197–204. doi: 10.1038/35008615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun J.Y., Wu X.S., Wu L.G. Single and multiple vesicle fusion induce different rates of endocytosis at a central synapse. Nature. 2002;417:555–559. doi: 10.1038/417555a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu L.G., Betz W.J. Nerve activity but not intracellular calcium determines the time course of endocytosis at the frog neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 1996;17:769–779. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80208-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamashita T., Hige T., Takahashi T. Vesicle endocytosis requires dynamin-dependent GTP hydrolysis at a fast CNS synapse. Science. 2005;307:124–127. doi: 10.1126/science.1103631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wei L., Guo X., Haimov E., Obashi K., Lee S.H., Shin W., Sun M., Chan C.Y., Sheng J., Zhang Z., et al. Clathrin mediates membrane fission and budding by constricting membrane pores. Cell Discov. 2024;10:62. doi: 10.1038/s41421-024-00677-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cipriano D.J., Jung J., Vivona S., Fenn T.D., Brunger A.T., Bryant Z. Processive ATP-driven substrate disassembly by the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) molecular machine. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:23436–23445. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.476705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Whiteheart S.W., Rossnagel K., Buhrow S.A., Brunner M., Jaenicke R., Rothman J.E. N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein: a trimeric ATPase whose hydrolysis of ATP is required for membrane fusion. J. Cell Biol. 1994;126:945–954. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jin Y.H., Wu X.S., Shi B., Zhang Z., Guo X., Gan L., Chen Z., Wu L.G. Protein Kinase C and Calmodulin Serve As Calcium Sensors for Calcium-Stimulated Endocytosis at Synapses. J. Neurosci. 2019;39:9478–9490. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.0182-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shi B., Jin Y.H., Wu L.G. Dynamin 1 controls vesicle size and endocytosis at hippocampal synapses. Cell Calcium. 2022;103 doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2022.102564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao W.D., Hamid E., Shin W., Wen P.J., Krystofiak E.S., Villarreal S.A., Chiang H.C., Kachar B., Wu L.G. Hemi-fused structure mediates and controls fusion and fission in live cells. Nature. 2016;534:548–552. doi: 10.1038/nature18598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shin W., Ge L., Arpino G., Villarreal S.A., Hamid E., Liu H., Zhao W.D., Wen P.J., Chiang H.C., Wu L.G. Visualization of Membrane Pore in Live Cells Reveals a Dynamic-Pore Theory Governing Fusion and Endocytosis. Cell. 2018;173:934–945.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shin W., Wei L., Arpino G., Ge L., Guo X., Chan C.Y., Hamid E., Shupliakov O., Bleck C.K.E., Wu L.G. Preformed Omega-profile closure and kiss-and-run mediate endocytosis and diverse endocytic modes in neuroendocrine chromaffin cells. Neuron. 2021;109:3119–3134.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chiang H.C., Shin W., Zhao W.D., Hamid E., Sheng J., Baydyuk M., Wen P.J., Jin A., Momboisse F., Wu L.G. Post-fusion structural changes and their roles in exocytosis and endocytosis of dense-core vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3356. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu L.G., Chan C.Y. Membrane transformations of fusion and budding. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:21. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44539-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arpino G., Somasundaram A., Shin W., Ge L., Villareal S., Chan C.Y., Ashery U., Shupliakov O., Taraska J.W., Wu L.G. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis cooperates with bulk endocytosis to generate vesicles. iScience. 2022;25 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Plattner H., Artalejo A.R., Neher E. Ultrastructural organization of bovine chromaffin cell cortex-analysis by cryofixation and morphometry of aspects pertinent to exocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 1997;139:1709–1717. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.7.1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Albillos A., Dernick G., Horstmann H., Almers W., Alvarez de Toledo G., Lindau M. The exocytotic event in chromaffin cells revealed by patch amperometry. Nature. 1997;389:509–512. doi: 10.1038/39081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shin W., Arpino G., Thiyagarajan S., Su R., Ge L., McDargh Z., Guo X., Wei L., Shupliakov O., Jin A., et al. Vesicle Shrinking and Enlargement Play Opposing Roles in the Release of Exocytotic Contents. Cell Rep. 2020;30:421–431.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Deák F., Schoch S., Liu X., Südhof T.C., Kavalali E.T. Synaptobrevin is essential for fast synaptic-vesicle endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:1102–1108. doi: 10.1038/ncb1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hosoi N., Holt M., Sakaba T. Calcium dependence of exo- and endocytotic coupling at a glutamatergic synapse. Neuron. 2009;63:216–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang Z., Wang D., Sun T., Xu J., Chiang H.C., Shin W., Wu L.G. The SNARE proteins SNAP25 and synaptobrevin are involved in endocytosis at hippocampal synapses. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:9169–9175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0301-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nicholson-Tomishima K., Ryan T.A. Kinetic efficiency of endocytosis at mammalian CNS synapses requires synaptotagmin I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:16648–16652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406968101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Poskanzer K.E., Fetter R.D., Davis G.W. Discrete residues in the c(2)b domain of synaptotagmin I independently specify endocytic rate and synaptic vesicle size. Neuron. 2006;50:49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yao J., Kwon S.E., Gaffaney J.D., Dunning F.M., Chapman E.R. Uncoupling the roles of synaptotagmin I during endo- and exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. Nat. Neurosci. 2011;15:243–249. doi: 10.1038/nn.3013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu L.G., Hamid E., Shin W., Chiang H.C. Exocytosis and endocytosis: modes, functions, and coupling mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2014;76:301–331. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shin W., Zucker B., Kundu N., Lee S.H., Shi B., Chan C.Y., Guo X., Harrison J.T., Turechek J.M., Hinshaw J.E., et al. Molecular mechanics underlying flat-to-round membrane budding in live secretory cells. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3697. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31286-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Das D., Bao H., Courtney K.C., Wu L., Chapman E.R. Resolving kinetic intermediates during the regulated assembly and disassembly of fusion pores. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:231. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14072-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Neher E. What is Rate-Limiting during Sustained Synaptic Activity: Vesicle Supply or the Availability of Release Sites. Front Synaptic. Neurosci. 2010;2:144. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu J., McNeil B., Wu W., Nees D., Bai L., Wu L.G. GTP-independent rapid and slow endocytosis at a central synapse. Nat. Neurosci. 2008;11:45–53. doi: 10.1038/nn2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heidelberger R. ATP is required at an early step in compensatory endocytosis in synaptic terminals. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:6467–6474. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06467.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhu Y., Xu J., Heinemann S.F. Two pathways of synaptic vesicle retrieval revealed by single-vesicle imaging. Neuron. 2009;61:397–411. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sun J.Y., Wu L.G. Fast kinetics of exocytosis revealed by simultaneous measurements of presynaptic capacitance and postsynatpic currents at a central synapse. Neuron. 2001;30:171–182. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00271-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu X.S., Wu L.G. Rapid endocytosis does not recycle vesicles within the readily releasable pool. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:11038–11042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2367-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.He L., Xue L., Xu J., McNeil B.D., Bai L., Melicoff E., Adachi R., Wu L.G. Compound vesicle fusion increases quantal size and potentiates synaptic transmission. Nature. 2009;459:93–97. doi: 10.1038/nature07860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shi B., Wu X.S., Cordero N.P., Moreira S.L., Wu L.G. Light and electron microscopic imaging of synaptic vesicle endocytosis at mouse hippocampal cultures. STAR Protoc. 2022;3 doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guo X., Han S., Wei L., Arpino G., Shin W., Wang X., Wu L.G. Real-time visualization of exo- and endocytosis membrane dynamics with confocal and super-resolution microscopy. STAR Protoc. 2022;3 doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smith C., Neher E. Multiple forms of endocytosis in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Cell Biol. 1997;139:885–894. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figures S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data produced for this manuscript are available from the lead contact (wul@ninds.nih.gov) upon reasonable request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES