Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1976 Jan;254(1):1–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011217

Studies of the contractility of mammalian myocardium at low rates of stimulation.

D G Allen, B R Jewell, E H Wood
PMCID: PMC1309176  PMID: 1249717

Abstract

1. Measurements have been made of tension development in papillary muscles isolated from the right ventricles of young cats. In some cases membrane potentials have also been recorded, using micro electrodes. 2. Regular contractions at a stimulation rate of 20 min(-1) (the 'standard' rate used in this study) had the following characteristics (30 degrees C): peak tension developed, about 43mN mm(-2); time to peak tension and time to 80% repolarization of the cell membrane, about 400 ms. 3. The corresponding figures for the first contraction after a rest of several minutes (rested state contraction) were: tension developed, about 4mN mm(-2); time to peak tension and time to 80% repolarization of the cell membrane, about 560 ms. Sometimes there was also an early peak in the mechanical response, about 250 ms after stimulation. 4. The time course with which tension development declined when the muscle was allowed to rest was examined under various conditions. It was found to decline more slowly when the muscle was potentiated by raising the bathing Ca2+ concentration and by stimulation at rates above 20 min(-1). 5. Tension development in rested state contractions was found to depend on the Ca2+ and Na+ concentrations in the bathing solution. The full effect of a change in either could be produced by exposing the resting muscle to the altered ionic conditions. 6. These experimental findings have been interpreted in terms of a simple model of the calcium movements involved in excitation-contraction coupling in the myocardial cell.

Full text

PDF
1

Images in this article

8Fig. 5
on p.8

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Antoni H., Jacob R., Kaufmann R. Mechanische Reaktionen des Frosch- und Säugetiermyokards bei Veränderung der Aktionspotential-Dauer durch konstante Gleichstromimpulse. Pflugers Arch. 1969;306(1):33–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00586610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beeler G. W., Jr, Reuter H. Membrane calcium current in ventricular myocardial fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):191–209. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blinks J. R. Convenient apparatus for recording contractions of isolated heart muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1965 Jul;20(4):755–757. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1965.20.4.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fawcett D. W., McNutt N. S. The ultrastructure of the cat myocardium. I. Ventricular papillary muscle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jul;42(1):1–45. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ford L. E., Podolsky R. J. Regenerative calcium release within muscle cells. Science. 1970 Jan 2;167(3914):58–59. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3914.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jewell B. R., Rovell J. M. Influence of previous mechanical events on the contractility of isolated cat papillary muscle. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):715–740. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KAVALER F. Membrane depolarization as a cause of tension development in mammalian ventricular muscle. Am J Physiol. 1959 Nov;197:968–970. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.5.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KOCH-WESER J., BLINKS J. R. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTERVAL BETWEEN BEATS ON MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTILITY. Pharmacol Rev. 1963 Sep;15:601–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Langer G. A. Coupling calcium in mammalian ventricle: its source and factors regulating its quantity. Cardiovasc Res. 1971 Jul;Suppl 1:71–75. doi: 10.1093/cvr/5.supp1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morad M., Trautwein W. The effect of the duration of the action potential on contraction in the mammalian heart muscle. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1968;299(1):66–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00362542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NIEDERGERKE R., LUTTGAU H. C. Antagonism between calcium and sodium ions. Nature. 1957 May 25;179(4569):1066–1067. doi: 10.1038/1791066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ochi R., Trautwein W. The dependence of cardiac contraction on depolarization and slow inward current. Pflugers Arch. 1971;323(3):187–203. doi: 10.1007/BF00586383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reiter M. Der Einfluss der Natriumionen auf die Beziehung zwischen Frequenz und Kraft der Kontraktion des isolierten Meerschweinchenmyokards. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol Exp Pathol. 1966;254(3):261–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reuter H. Exchange of calcium ions in the mammalian myocardium. Mechanisms and physiological significance. Circ Res. 1974 May;34(5):599–605. doi: 10.1161/01.res.34.5.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ringer S. A further Contribution regarding the influence of the different Constituents of the Blood on the Contraction of the Heart. J Physiol. 1883 Jan;4(1):29–42.3. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1883.sp000120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tritthart H., Kaufmann R., Volkmer H. P., Bayer R., Krause H. Ca-movement controlling myocardial contractility. I. Voltage-, current- and time-dependence of mechanical activity under voltage clamp conditions (cat papillary muscles and trabeculae). Pflugers Arch. 1973 Feb 6;338(3):207–231. doi: 10.1007/BF00587388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WEBER A., HERZ R., REISS I. THE REGULATION OF MYOFIBRILLAR ACTIVITY BY CALCIUM. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Oct 27;160:489–501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WOODBURY J. W., BRADY A. J. Intracellular recording from moving tissues with a flexibly mounted ultramicroelectrode. Science. 1956 Jan 20;123(3186):100–101. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3186.100-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Winegrad S. The intracellular site of calcium activaton of contraction in frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jan;55(1):77–88. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wood E. H., Heppner R. L., Weidmann S. Inotropic effects of electric currents. I. Positive and negative effects of constant electric currents or current pulses applied during cardiac action potentials. II. Hypotheses: calcium movements, excitation-contraction coupling and inotropic effects. Circ Res. 1969 Mar;24(3):409–445. doi: 10.1161/01.res.24.3.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES