Skip to main content
Microbiology logoLink to Microbiology
. 2026 Apr 20;172(4):001694. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001694

Microbial Primer: Bacterial energy metabolism

Qonita Afinanisa 1,, Alexander Brooks 1,, Iremide Sanyaolu 1,, Ashwathi Valiyaparambil 1,, Tim W Overton 1,*
PMCID: PMC13095032  PMID: 42008292

Abstract

All cells need energy to perform their functions. This primer introduces energy metabolism in bacteria, with a focus on key pathways and examples from model organisms, while acknowledging that bacterial diversity means that species such as Escherichia coli are not always ‘typical’ in terms of energy metabolism. It finishes by looking at how metabolism underpins important bacterial behaviours.

Keywords: anaerobic metabolism, energy metabolism, fermentation, respiration

Why do bacteria need energy?

All cells need energy – indeed, the harvesting of energy is a fundamental requirement of life and a classifier of living things. Energy is needed for processes such as movement, chemical reactions (typically anabolic reactions that generate larger molecules from smaller building blocks) and the transport of molecules across membranes against a concentration gradient. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another; therefore, living organisms must harvest or capture energy from their environment. Bacteria also require carbon, a fundamental atomic component of biochemicals and, thereby, cells. Acquisition of energy and carbon is often linked.

Where does energy come from?

Humans gain energy and carbon from the same source, the breakdown (catabolism) of organic molecules (the food we eat); we are therefore classed as chemoheterotrophs. Many bacteria do the same, for example, the model organisms Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. However, we must acknowledge that bacteria are incredibly diverse, and many bacterial species can harvest energy from light (photosynthesis – phototrophs) or inorganic chemicals like iron or sulphur (lithotrophs). Likewise, many bacterial species ‘fix’ carbon from CO2, like green plants (autotrophs) [1] . Within ecosystems, phototrophs, lithotrophs and autotrophs are often referred to as ‘primary producers’, in that they capture energy and carbon from the environment and provide them to consumers (heterotrophs like humans and E. coli). For the remainder of this primer, we will consider energy metabolism in chemoheterotrophs, whilst acknowledging the broader diversity of bacterial energy and carbon metabolism.

The basics: aerobic glucose metabolism

The preferred carbon and energy source for many bacteria (e.g. E. coli) is glucose – for this reason, many descriptions of energy metabolism start with glucose. In the presence of oxygen, glucose is completely oxidized (equation 1).

C6H12O6+6O26CO2+H2O (1)

This reaction liberates energy; oxidation of glucose in a chemistry laboratory would be called combustion and would release energy in the form of heat. In biological systems, the energy released is captured in different ways, most commonly in the form of chemical energy-carrier molecules, the most ubiquitous being ATP. ATP is hydrolysed to ADP with the loss of a phosphate group, releasing energy, which is used to drive work within the bacterium. Typically, in bioenergetics, this useful energy is stated as Gibbs free energy (G) and the release of energy as a negative change in G, ΔG. ATP is used as an energy carrier as the ΔG of hydrolysis of ATP to ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) is highly negative. ATP can be thought of like a charged battery, whereas ADP can be compared to a discharged battery. Glucose oxidation is used to drive the production of ATP from ADP, thereby ‘recharging’ the energy store.

Metabolism of glucose also generates intermediate chemicals, required as building blocks for the synthesis of diverse biomolecules and new cells, and reducing power in the form of the electron carriers NAD and NADP. These reversibly associate with electrons and protons and are required to enable reduction in a range of enzymatic reactions, and for the final stages of respiration.

Glucose is oxidized via multiple reactions, which can be split into three stages: glycolysis, the citric acid cycle and the respiratory chain (Fig. 1a). Glycolysis converts glucose to pyruvate. There are three glycolytic pathways in E. coli, the most prevalent being the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway (EMPP), which comprises ten reactions and yields two ATP molecules and two NADH molecules per glucose. The pyruvate generated by glycolysis is then completely oxidized to carbon dioxide by the citric acid cycle (eight reactions, also referred to as the Krebs cycle), with release of energy in the form of guanosine triphosphate (comparable to ATP), and reducing power [NADH and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2), the latter a protein-bound electron carrier]. Both glycolysis and the citric acid cycle occur in the bacterial cytoplasm.

Fig. 1. Summary of aerobic energy metabolism with a focus on E. coli. (a) Simplified outline of aerobic glucose oxidation. Summary of glycolysis (the EMPP), the citric acid cycle and a simplified respiratory chain. Not all intermediates are shown. The EMPP comprises ten reactions that convert glucose to two pyruvate molecules and yield two ATPs and two NADHs per glucose. It should be noted that two ATP molecules are initially consumed per molecule of glucose, with the final generation of four ATP molecules, resulting in an overall yield of two ATPs. The citric acid cycle oxidizes the carbon in pyruvate to CO2, yielding two GTPs per glucose plus reducing power in the form of NADH and FADH2. Reducing power from NADH and FADH2 is fed into the respiratory chain through dehydrogenases, which reduce the quinone (Q) pool to quinols (QH2). The reduced quinols then pass electrons to the terminal oxidases, which reduce terminal electron acceptors (O2 in the case of aerobic respiration). Protons are pumped across the inner membrane, generating the PMF, which is used to drive ATP synthesis as well as other functions, such as transporters. (b) Summary of sugar metabolic pathways. The three glycolytic pathways are the EMPP, EDP and PPP. Abbreviated intermediate names and the number of carbons in each molecule are: F6P (six carbons), G3P (three carbons), 6PG (six carbons), Ru5P (five carbons), X5P (five carbons), R5P (five carbons), S7P (seven carbons) and E4P (four carbons). Not all steps and intermediates are shown for clarity. (c) Outline of the aerobic respiratory chain in E. coli. Selected dehydrogenases are shown on the left (some alternative dehydrogenases are not shown for clarity), the quinol pool in the centre (comprising three quinols) and the three terminal oxidases on the right, summarizing their enzymatic features and aspects of regulation below. E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; EDP, Entner–Doudoroff pathway; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; 6 PG, 6-phosphogluconate; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose 7-phosphate; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; X5P, xylose-5-phosphate.

Metabolic diagram of E. coli aerobic energy metabolism. Illustrates glycolysis via EMPP, EDP and PPP pathways linked to citric acid cycle and respiratory chain. Shows dehydrogenases, quinol pool and terminal oxidases generating PMF for ATP synthesis.

The reducing power liberated by these first two stages then drives the respiratory chain, which occurs at the cell (inner) membrane; a model respiratory chain is shown in Fig. 1a. The electrons are transferred from NADH, through a series of membrane-spanning multi-enzyme complexes (the respiratory complexes), until they reduce oxygen to water. These enzymes transfer electrons through redox-active cofactors including haem (in cytochromes), flavin and iron–sulphur centres. Electrons pass from a negative to a positive redox potential, releasing energy at each step.

NADH is first oxidized to NAD+ by an NADH dehydrogenase, which transfers the electrons to quinols (Q), hydrophobic electron-carrier molecules localized within the lipid portion of the membrane. Quinol refers to the reduced molecule (QH2) and quinone to the oxidized form (Q). The quinols migrate laterally through the membrane, shuttling electrons to the terminal oxidase, which reduces oxygen to water. Oxygen is thereby the terminal electron acceptor. The energy released by electron transfer permits some respiratory complexes to pump protons outside the membrane, generating an electrochemical gradient, the proton motive force (PMF). A major role of the PMF is to provide energy to the ATP synthase enzyme, where protons pass back to the cytoplasm, driving ATP synthesis. This process is referred to as oxidative phosphorylation.

The PMF is also used to drive a range of other cellular functions at the membrane, such as the transport of molecules across the membrane against a concentration gradient by transporters, efflux of antimicrobial compounds by efflux pumps and rotation of the flagella permitting motility. The PMF is a component of the membrane potential, reviewed by Benarroch and Asally [2]. Overall, oxidation of one glucose molecule can yield up to 38 ATP molecules; however, this number decreases if the PMF is used to power other functions, or if carbon intermediates are channelled to other biomolecules in the bacterium.

Adding complexity: metabolic diversity in carbon sources

Building on the simple scheme given above, most bacteria are able to utilize a range of substrates to support growth. To use a substrate, it has to enter the bacterium (usually via a transporter) and be chemically transformed to enter central carbon metabolism. The substrate range of different species therefore depends upon their genomic repertoire of transporters and enzymes.

There are three pathways for hexose (six-carbon sugar) utilization. We have introduced the EMPP above; many bacteria (although not E. coli) convert hexoses to pyruvate via an alternative glycolytic pathway, the Entner–Doudoroff pathway, comprising only five enzymatic steps. The third major pathway for monosaccharide utilization is the pentose phosphate pathway, interconverting sugars containing three to seven carbons, permitting diverse sugar utilization, and generating NADPH, an important source of reducing power for biosynthesis reactions.

Disaccharides and polysaccharides are typically broken down to monosaccharides before entering central carbon metabolism; for example, lactose is split by β-galactosidase (LacZ) in E. coli to glucose and galactose, which enter the EMPP. Other common substrates include organic acids and amino acids, which are typically converted to organic acids (a process called transamination) before entering central carbon metabolism. This is effectively the opposite of amino acid synthesis.

The range of substrates that a given species can utilize is usually a reflection of which molecules are available in its environment; many human pathogens are able to utilize lactate, which is found in many tissues. Many selective growth media permit the identification of bacteria based on the range of substrates they can use.

Aerobic respiratory chain flexibility and diversity

The respiratory chain is slightly more complicated than introduced above, with multiple dehydrogenases feeding electrons to the quinol pool, driving multiple terminal oxidases. Different species also possess different respiratory chain architectures [3] and can use their respiratory chain flexibly, depending on growth conditions and oxygen concentrations.

In E. coli (Fig. 1c), there are two NADH dehydrogenases: NDH-I (encoded by the nuo operon), which is proton-pumping, and NDH-II (ndh), which does not pump protons. NDH-I is also referred to as Complex I, as it has homology to the human mitochondrial complex of the same name; respiration is thereby deeply conserved through evolution.

NDH-I and NDH-II pass electrons to three quinols: ubiquinol, menaquinol and demethylmenaquinone. Electrons are also passed to quinols by succinate dehydrogenase (sdhABCD), which catalyses the reduction of succinate to fumarate in the citric acid cycle, using FADH2 as an electron carrier. Other dehydrogenases, including GlpD and Dld, oxidize glycerol-3-phosphate and lactate, respectively.

Quinols pass electrons to one of three terminal oxidases, varying in activity and affinity. Cytochrome bo (cyoABCDE) is proton-pumping and high-throughput, but has low oxygen affinity, so it is used at high oxygen concentrations. Cytochrome bd-I (cydABX-cydH) has a higher affinity for oxygen, so it is used at low oxygen concentrations (microaerobic conditions). Expression of these operons is repressed by the oxygen-sensing transcription factor FNR and is differentially regulated by the two-component regulatory system ArcBA, which senses the redox state of the quinol pool, repressing cyo but activating cyd. This demonstrates that energy metabolism is carefully regulated at the level of transcription. The third terminal oxidase, cytochrome bd-II (appCBX), is less well characterized. The complexity of the E. coli respiratory chain is reviewed by Unden et al. [4].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has a more complicated, branched aerobic respiratory chain, with three NADH dehydrogenases and several other dehydrogenases feeding electrons into the quinol pool. There are five terminal oxidases, two of which take electrons directly from the quinol pool, with the remaining three channelling electrons from quinol via two intermediate cytochromes (bc1 and c). This diversity allows Pseudomonas to live in a variety of environments with varied oxygen tensions. Furthermore, this species generates hydrogen cyanide, which inhibits most terminal oxidases; P. aeruginosa must therefore express a cyanide-insensitive terminal oxidase. Moving away from Gram-negative species, Staphylococcus aureus possesses two NADH dehydrogenases, both NDH-II type (there is no NDH-I/Complex I in this species), and two terminal oxidases (Qox and Cyd).

Life without oxygen: anaerobic energy metabolism

Unlike humans, many bacterial species can survive in the absence of oxygen; facultative anaerobes (such as E. coli) are those that can grow without oxygen, whereas obligate anaerobes require oxygen-free conditions. Aerobically, the reducing power carried by NADH is used to reduce oxygen to water. In the absence of oxygen, bacteria must direct the reducing power to other end points. There are two approaches to this: fermentation, where the reducing power is used to directly reduce intermediates of central carbon metabolism, eliminating the respiratory chain; and anaerobic respiration, where electrons are used to reduce molecules other than oxygen (called alternative electron acceptors). Anaerobic metabolism varies widely between different species, both in terms of whether fermentation or respiration is preferred, and the range of substrates and electron acceptors.

  1. E. coli can ferment glucose to a range of reduced end products, commonly referred to as mixed-acid fermentation (Fig. 2a). The generation of different end products utilizes different quantities of NADH and also generates different quantities of ATP, permitting flexibility depending on whether the bacterium requires NAD+ recycling or energy. It should also be noted that formate and hydrogen generated by fermentation can drive respiration; formate dehydrogenase and hydrogenase enzymes transfer electrons to the quinol pool (Fig. 2b).

  2. E. coli can use five alternative electron acceptors: nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), fumarate, DMSO and trimethylamine N-oxide (Fig. 2b). Salmonella adds tetrathionate and thiosulphate to this list. The terminal reductase enzymes catalysing these reactions are located at the inner membrane; their expression is regulated by the availability of oxygen (mediated by FNR and ArcBA) and by their relevant electron acceptors (e.g. the nitrate- and nitrite-sensing two-component regulatory systems NarXL and NarQP). Similar to terminal oxidases, there are multiple nitrate and nitrite reductases, with higher and lower affinity and activity. It should be noted that not all dehydrogenases can donate electrons to all terminal reductases; coupling is energetically constrained by the redox potential of each enzyme.

Fig. 2. Aspects of anaerobic energy metabolism in E. coli and Salmonella. (a) Mixed-acid fermentation in E. coli. End products are shown in orange, indicating which pathways consume reducing power (NADH) and/or generate ATP. Conversion of acetyl CoA and oxaloacetate to succinate via the citric acid cycle does not occur under these conditions, as indicated by greyed-out steps. Not all steps and intermediates are shown for clarity. (b) Anaerobic respiration in E. coli and Salmonella. Relevant dehydrogenases are shown on the left, and terminal reductases on the right, each with their substrates and products. DMS, dimethyl sulphide; TMA, trimethylamine; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide.

Metabolic pathways of bacterial anaerobic energy metabolism. Fermentation diagram shows glucose conversion to end products with ATP generation. Respiratory pathway connects dehydrogenases to terminal reductases via quinol for various electron acceptors.

Real-world implications of energy metabolism

Bacteria have evolved to live in different niches; energy metabolism reflects this, with each species being able to utilize the substrates and electron acceptors (oxygen or alternatives) present in each environment. Energy metabolism, therefore, has a massive impact on bacterial physiology and behaviour; it underlies many aspects of bacterial behaviour and survival.

Impacts on physiology: life in the host

The ability to adapt to different host environments plays a critical role in both bacterial pathogenicity and commensalism. Many bacteria have evolved to utilize host-derived molecules; lactate is the end product of fermentation in human cells and can be utilized by many bacteria as a carbon and energy source. During infection, Salmonella hijacks host cell energy metabolism to power its own metabolism in favour of bacterial proliferation and dissemination. Salmonella species can infect diverse niches in their hosts and therefore can adapt to different host environments.

During colonization of the gut, Salmonella Typhimurium exploits the metabolism of both the host and the gastrointestinal microbiome by inducing inflammation [5]. This provides Salmonella with lactate and oxygen (both generated by host metabolism) and the alternative electron acceptors nitrate and tetrathionate, which are used in respiration of microbiota-derived 1,2-propanediol and ethanolamine as carbon sources. In addition, succinate produced by the gut microbiota can be catabolized by Salmonella, acting as a source of carbon to complete the citric acid cycle.

Salmonella Typhimurium can also survive inside human macrophages; the Salmonella pathogenicity islands encode effectors that reprogramme macrophage metabolism to provide carbon sources, including 2- and 3-phosphoglycerate and phosphoenolpyruvate [6]. There are many such examples of bacteria modulating human metabolism for their benefit.

Impacts on physiology: biofilm formation

Most bacteria live not planktonically, but in biofilms, assemblies of bacteria enclosed within a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix. Many biofilms are problematic to humanity, for example, those causing infections. Nutrient and oxygen concentrations within biofilms vary spatially, not only due to limitation of diffusion through the EPS matrix but also due to utilization by bacteria within the biofilm, giving rise to varied microenvironments. Most naturally occurring biofilms comprise multiple species and strains, each potentially having their own preferred energy sources and electron acceptors, increasing the complexity further.

In oxygen-limited (anoxic) microenvironments, for example, deep in the biofilm, bacteria can use alternative electron acceptors. Previous work has shown that, in in vivo and in vitro P. aeruginosa biofilms, bacteria in the outer layers rapidly respire oxygen while the inner cells switch to nitrate reduction [7]. Unlike E. coli, P. aeruginosa reduces nitrate to N2, a stepwise process via NO2, NO and N2O called denitrification. Interestingly, simultaneous oxygen and nitrate respiration can occur at the same depth within the biofilm. Oxygen inhibits the last step of denitrification, generating N2O as the end product. However, the ATP produced can still contribute to the energy demand across the varying oxygen gradient. This shows that cells can physiologically adapt to different micro-niches. An intermediate of denitrification, NO, can also induce biofilm dispersal, further amplifying the heterogeneity of biofilms.

New evidence suggests a more fundamental link between energy metabolism and biofilms. There is a growing body of literature showing that respiration can lead to formation or dispersal of biofilms (termed respiration-induced biofilm formation or respiration-induced biofilm dispersal) in a species- and strain-dependent manner (reviewed by Martín-Rodríguez [8]). This emerging link could offer novel routes to prevent formation or drive dispersal of biofilms, which is especially important given that biofilms are often resistant to antimicrobials.

Impacts on physiology: bioprocesses

As well as posing problems to humanity, bacteria are also used in productive processes. For decades, E. coli has been used for production of industrially relevant recombinant proteins, such as the drug insulin. In these processes, there needs to be a balance between biomass generation and product formation, both requiring intermediates such as amino acids, energy and reducing power. Recombinant protein production is described as posing a metabolic burden on bacteria.

In such processes, E. coli is typically grown in bioreactors, usually to very high cell densities (optical densities at 650 nm >100, >40 g dry cell weight per litre) [9]. This poses a problem because high quantities of carbon source are needed to support such high biomass accumulation. However, supplementation of growth media with a high concentration of glucose would result in overflow metabolism, whereby glucose is fermented to acetate and other acids rather than being respired, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen. This is not only wasteful (reducing ATP yield) but also reduces culture pH, inhibiting growth. Industrial solutions to this problem include use of a fed-batch growth method, where glucose is added gradually through the process, use of glycerol as a carbon source (which does not generate as much acetate as glucose) and use of E. coli B strains such as BL21, which produce less acetate due to changes in metabolism.

Another example of useful microbes is lactic acid bacteria, a grouping of multiple bacterial species, including Lactobacillus, which are widely used in the dairy industry and as probiotics. Many Lactobacillus species primarily harvest energy through homolactic fermentation, a pathway that generates lactate as a sole end product. Surprisingly, many of these species possess an aerobic respiratory chain but are unable to synthesize haem cofactors and quinones [10]. Providing these bacteria with exogenous haem and menaquinone permits respiration and has been shown to improve growth in industrial settings.

Acid production is relevant to the use of Lactobacillus spp. in the dairy industry, transforming milk into yoghurt and preventing spoilage by competing microbes. Competition is also likely the natural function of lactate production; Lactobacillus spp. are human commensals and live in polymicrobial environments, such as the gut and vagina. In these environments, haem and menaquinone are available, supporting some respiratory growth.

Conclusions

We can see that energy metabolism is diverse, is often complicated and is driven by the resources available to a given bacterial species in its natural habitat. It can therefore give clues to the habitat and overall lifestyle of the organisms. In particular, the study of the interplay between bacterial energy metabolism and host metabolic pathways is offering insights into pathogenesis, commensalism and complex interactions within the microbiota.

When growing bacteria in the laboratory, one should think about how growth conditions are allowing them to harvest energy. Indeed, given the diverse mechanisms of energy generation possessed by many species, one should consider how different carbon sources and electron acceptors are influencing behaviour, gene regulation and physiology.

Finally, it may be surprising to learn how little is known about energy metabolism in some species. Genome sequencing has allowed far greater understanding of the enzymes encoded by different species and strains, so predictions of preferred routes of energy metabolism can be made, but experimental confirmation is often required, especially where novel pathways are involved.

Acknowledgements

As well as the references noted below, Ecocyc (https://ecocyc.org/https://ecocyc.org/) and the articles within the EcoSal Plus journal, published by ASM, are excellent (and incredibly detailed) sources of information on Escherichia coli.

Abbreviations

EMPP

Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway

EPS

extracellular polymeric substance

FADH2

flavin adenine dinucleotide

G

Gibbs free energy

Pi

inorganic phosphate

PMF

proton motive force

Footnotes

Funding: A.V. and Q.A. are funded by studentships from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. A.B. is funded by a studentship from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, supported by Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited. I.S. is funded by a studentship from the University of Birmingham. The funders played no role in this manuscript.

Dedication: This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jeff Cole.

Contributor Information

Qonita Afinanisa, Email: qam219@student.bham.ac.uk.

Alexander Brooks, Email: axb1199@student.bham.ac.uk.

Iremide Sanyaolu, Email: ixs402@student.bham.ac.uk.

Ashwathi Valiyaparambil, Email: axv381@student.bham.ac.uk.

Tim W. Overton, Email: t.w.overton@bham.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Claassens NJ, Sousa DZ, Dos Santos VAPM, de Vos WM, van der Oost J. Harnessing the power of microbial autotrophy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:692–706. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benarroch JM, Asally M. The microbiologist’s guide to membrane potential dynamics. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaila VRI, Wikström M. Architecture of bacterial respiratory chains. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:319–330. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00486-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Unden G, Steinmetz PA, Degreif-Dünnwald P. The aerobic and anaerobic respiratory chain of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica: enzymes and energetics. EcoSal Plus. 2014;6 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0005-2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rogers AWL, Tsolis RM, Bäumler AJ. Salmonella versus the microbiome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020;85:e00027–19. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00027-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pokorzynski. Groisman EA. How bacterial pathogens coordinate appetite with virulence. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023;87:e0019822. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00198-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stoodley P, Toelke N, Schwermer C, de Beer D. Bioenergetics of simultaneous oxygen and nitrate respiration and nitric oxide production in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa agar colony biofilm. Biofilm. 2024;7:100181. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martín-Rodríguez AJ. Respiration-induced biofilm formation as a driver for bacterial niche colonization. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:120–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee SY. High cell-density culture of Escherichia coli. Trends Biotechnol. 1996;14:98–105. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(96)80930-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lechardeur D, Cesselin B, Fernandez A, Lamberet G, Garrigues C, et al. Using heme as an energy boost for lactic acid bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES