Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1975 Jul;249(2):399–423. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011022

An analysis of the representation of the forelimb in the ventrobasal thalamic complex of the albino rat.

A Angel, K A Clarke
PMCID: PMC1309581  PMID: 1177098

Abstract

1. Glass micro-electrodes have been used to record from a total of 998 units situated in the ventrobasal thalamic complex in the deeply anaesthetized albino rat. 2. Of these units 889 responded to electrical stimulation of the contralateral forelimb and fifty-one to the contralateral hind limb. The remaining units consisted of those with receptive fields on the trunk, head and those which responded to stimulation of more than one limb. Only the latter group of units showed any spontaneous activity in the absence of intentional stimulation. 2. Of the units which responded to electrical stimulation of the contralateral forelimb the receptive fields, modality and latencies of response were accurately determined for 505 units. The mean latency to supramaximal stimulation at the wrist was 4.49 (+/- 0.04 S.E. of mean) msec; and to mechanical stimulation (for 146 of these units) at the centre of the receptive field 6.58 (+/- 0.12) msec. The modalities were distributed as follows: light pressure, 391; heavy pressure, 47; hair movement, 40; claw sensitive, 15 and joint movement, 12 units. 4. The forelimb representation within the ventrobasal thalamic complex was somatotopically organized, the over-all appearance being that of an incompletely closed fist, palmar surface uppermost, thumb media, with the wrist caudal and the digital tips rostral and dorsal. 5. The central projection was distorted, some parts showing expanded representation, notably the tips of digits II and III and the medial wrist pad. Other parts were contracted, e.g. the wrist, forearm and shoulder. 6. Units with receptive fields consisting of the whole of a walking pad had shorter mean latencies, to tactile stimulation, than those whose field was a single spot on a pad. 7. Units were found to show an abolute unresponsive time to the second of a pair of identical supramaximal electrical stimuli of up to 50 msec, and a relative unresponsive time which could last up to 500 msec. The absolute unresponsive and relative unresponsive times to the second of a pair of tactile stimuli was shorter being 30 and 150 msec respectively. 8. The effect of decortication was to increase the excitability of thalamic units to peripheral stimulation both in the initial and later discharges.

Full text

PDF
399

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSEN P., ECCLES J. C., SEARS T. A. THE VENTRO-BASAL COMPLEX OF THE THALAMUS: TYPES OF CELLS, THEIR RESPONSES AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION. J Physiol. 1964 Nov;174:370–399. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANGEL A. THE EFFECT OF PERIPHERAL STIMULATION ON UNITS LOCATED IN THE THALAMIC RETICULAR NUCLEI. J Physiol. 1964 May;171:42–60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angel A., Berridge D. A., Unwin J. The effect of anaesthetic agents on primary cortical evoked responses. Br J Anaesth. 1973 Aug;45(8):824–836. doi: 10.1093/bja/45.8.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angel A., Clarke K. A. Fine somatotopic representation of the forelimb area of the ventrobasal thalamus of the albino rat. J Physiol. 1973 Aug;233(1):43P–44P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Angel A. Cortical responses to paired stimuli applied peripherally & at sites along the somato-sensory pathway. J Physiol. 1967 Jul;191(2):427–448. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown A. G., Gordon G., Kay R. H. A study of single axons in the cat's medial lemniscus. J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(1):225–246. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidson N. The projection of afferent pathways on the thalamus of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1965 Jun;124(3):377–390. doi: 10.1002/cne.901240308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EMMERS R. ORGANIZATION OF THE FIRST AND THE SECOND SOMESTHETIC REGIONS (SI AND SII) IN THE RAT THALAMUS. J Comp Neurol. 1965 Apr;124:215–227. doi: 10.1002/cne.901240207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GORDON G., JUKES M. G. DUAL ORGANIZATION OF THE EXTEROCEPTIVE COMPONENTS OF THE CAT'S GRACILE NUCLEUS. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:263–290. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GORDON G., PAINE C. H. Functional organization in nucleus gracilis of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:331–349. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GORDON G., SEED W. A. An investigation of nucleus gracilis of the cat by antidromic stimulation. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:589–601. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gwyn D. G., Waldron H. A. A nucleus in the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord of the rat. Brain Res. 1968 Sep;10(3):342–351. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(68)90204-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hand P. J. Lumbosacral dorsal root terminations in the nucleus gracilis of the cat. Some observations on terminal degeneration in other medullary sensory nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1966 Feb;126(2):137–156. doi: 10.1002/cne.901260201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KUYPERS H. G., TUERK J. D. THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CORTICAL FIBRES WITHIN THE NUCLEI CUNEATUS AND GRACILIS IN THE CAT. J Anat. 1964 Apr;98:143–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaizawa J., Takahashi I. The monosynaptic origin of the fast synchronous wave in rat spinal reflex. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1970 Feb;100(2):115–125. doi: 10.1620/tjem.100.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lund R. D., Webster K. E. Thalamic afferents from the dorsal column nuclei. An experimental anatomical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1967 Aug;130(4):301–312. doi: 10.1002/cne.901300403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lund R. D., Webster K. E. Thalamic afferents from the spinal cord and trigeminal nuclei. An experimental anatomical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1967 Aug;130(4):313–328. doi: 10.1002/cne.901300404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCance I., Phillis J. W., Westerman R. A. Acetylcholine-sensitivity of thalamic neurones: its relationship to synaptic transmission. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1968 Mar;32(3):635–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00463.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McComas A. J. Responses of the rat dorsal column system to mechanical stimulation of the hind paw. J Physiol. 1963 May;166(3):435–448. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mikhail Y. Some observations on the structure of the cervical portion of the spinal cord of the albino rat. Acta Anat (Basel) 1972;81(2):225–236. doi: 10.1159/000143762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PERL E. R., WHITLOCK D. G., GENTRY J. R. Cutaneous projection to second-order neurons of the dorsal column system. J Neurophysiol. 1962 May;25:337–358. doi: 10.1152/jn.1962.25.3.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. POGGIO G. F., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. A study of the functional contributions of the lemniscal and spinothalamic systems to somatic sensibility. Central nervous mechanisms in pain. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1960 May;106:266–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. POGGIO G. F., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. THE FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF VENTROBASAL THALAMIC NEURONSSTUDIED IN UNANESTHETIZED MONKEYS. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Sep;26:775–806. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.5.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. POGGIO G. F., VIERNSTEIN L. J. TIME SERIES ANALYSIS OF IMPULSE SEQUENCES OF THALAMIC SOMATIC SENSORY NEURONS. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Jul;27:517–545. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.4.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rinvik E. A re-evaluation of the cytoarchitecture of the ventral nuclear complex of the cat's thalamus on the basis of corticothalamic connections. Brain Res. 1968 May;8(2):237–254. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(68)90045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WALL P. D., MCCULLOCH W. S., LETTVIN J. Y., PITTS W. H. The terminal arborisation of the cat's pyramidal tract determined by a new technique. Yale J Biol Med. 1955 Dec;28(3-4):457–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WELKER W. I., JOHNSON J. I., Jr, PUBOLS B. H., Jr SOME MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOMATIC SENSORY SYSTEM IN RACCOONS. Am Zool. 1964 Feb;4:75–94. doi: 10.1093/icb/4.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. WINTER D. L. N. GRACILIS OF CAT. FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION AND CORTICOFUGAL EFFECTS. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Jan;28:48–70. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wall P. D., Egger M. D. Formation of new connexions in adult rat brains after partial deafferentation. Nature. 1971 Aug 20;232(5312):542–545. doi: 10.1038/232542a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Welker W. I., Johnson J. I., Jr Correlation between nuclear morphology and somatotopic organization in ventro-basal complex of the raccoon's thalamus. J Anat. 1965 Oct;99(Pt 4):761–790. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES