Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1975 Aug;249(3):617–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011034

The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli.

E Jankowska, Y Padel, R Tanaka
PMCID: PMC1309596  PMID: 1177108

Abstract

1. Direct and indirect effects of intracortical stimulattion on pyramidal tract cells were compared in the monkey and in the cat under barbiturate or chloralose anaesthesia. The hind-limb motor areas were explored, that in the monkey only within the convex part of the precentral gyrus. The intracortical stimuli were applied in the nearest vicinity of pyramidal tract cells, where antidromic spike potentials of single cells were recorded. 2. Average records of descending volleys in corticospinal tract fibres were taken from the surface of the lateral funiculus or from its dissected fascicles. The sensitivity of the recording was sufficient to detect responses in single fibres. 3. The latencies of the earliest descending volleys evoked by weak intracortical stimuli were compared with the latencies of the antidromic spike potentials of pyramidal tract cells evoked by stimulation of the lateral funiculus at a low lumbar level (same conduction distance). Only in about one third of cases these latencies were similar and compatible with a direct activation of pyramidal tract cells. In the remaining cases they indicated mono- or polysynaptic activation of pyramidal tract cells. 4. Latencies of the later components of the descending volleys indicated that they were due to indirect activation of pyramidal tract cells in practically all cases. 5. The components of the descending volleys attributable to the indirect activation of pyramidal tract cells were greatly increased when repetitive intracortical stimuli were applied instead of single ones. 6. The investigation leads to the conclusion that a weak intracortical stimulation is relatively ineffective in a direct excitation of pyramidal tract cells and that the effects of such a stimulation are mainly indirect, especially when repetitive stimuli are used.

Full text

PDF
617

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen P., Hagan P. J., Phillips C. G., Powell T. P. Mapping by microstimulation of overlapping projections from area 4 to motor units of the baboon's hand. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Jan 21;188(1090):31–36. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1975.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asanuma H. Cerebral cortical control of movement. Physiologist. 1973 May;16(2):143–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asanuma H., Rosén I. Spread of mono- and polysynaptic connections within cat's motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1973 Mar 19;16(5):507–520. doi: 10.1007/BF00234477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asanuma H., Rosén I. Topographical organization of cortical efferent zones projecting to distal forelimb muscles in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1972;14(3):243–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00816161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asanuma H., Stoney S. D., Jr, Abzug C. Relationship between afferent input and motor outflow in cat motorsensory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Sep;31(5):670–681. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asanuma H., Ward J. E. Patterns of contraction of distal forelimb muscles produced by intracortical stimulation in cats. Brain Res. 1971 Mar 19;27(1):97–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90374-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldissera F., Lundberg A., Udo M. Stimulation of pre- and postsynaptic elements in the red nucleus. Exp Brain Res. 1972;15(2):151–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00235579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HERN J. E., LANDGREN S., PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. Selective excitation of corticofugal neurones by surface-anodal stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Apr;161:73–90. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Illert M., Lundberg A., Tanaka R. Disynaptic corticospinal effects in forelimb motoneurones in the cat. Brain Res. 1974 Jul 26;75(2):312–315. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90752-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jankowska E., Padel Y., Tanaka R. Projections of pyramidal tract cells to alpha-motoneurones innervating hind-limb muscles in the monkey. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):637–667. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jankowska E., Roberts W. J. An electrophysiological demonstration of the axonal projections of single spinal interneurones in the cat. J Physiol. 1972 May;222(3):597–622. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KUYPERS H. G. An anatomical analysis of cortico-bulbar connexions to the pons and lower brain stem in the cat. J Anat. 1958 Apr;92(2):198–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kernell D., Chien-Ping W. U. Responses of the pyramidal tract to stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex. J Physiol. 1967 Aug;191(3):653–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuypers H. G., Lawrence D. G. Cortical projections to the red nucleus and the brain stem in the Rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1967 Mar;4(2):151–188. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LANDGREN S., PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. Minimal synaptic actions of pyramidal impulses on some alpha motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearm. J Physiol. 1962 Apr;161:91–111. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LAPORTE Y., LUNDBERG A., OSCARSSON O. Functional organization of the dorsal spino-cerebellar tract in the cat. I. Recording of mass discharge in dissected Flechsig's fasciculus. Acta Physiol Scand. 1956 Mar 24;36(1-2):175–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1956.tb01316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Landau W. M., Bishop G. H., Clare M. H. Site of excitation in stimulation of the motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1206–1222. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PATTON H. D., AMASSIAN V. E. Single and multiple-unit analysis of cortical stage of pyramidal tract activation. J Neurophysiol. 1954 Jul;17(4):345–363. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.4.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PHILLIPS C. G. Intracellular records from Betz cells in the cat. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1956 Jan;41(1):58–69. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1956.sp001163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roberts W. J., Smith D. O. Analysis of threshold currents during microstimulation of fibres in the spinal cord. Acta Physiol Scand. 1973 Nov;89(3):384–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosenthal J., Waller H. J., Amassian V. E. An analysis of the activation of motor cortical neurons by surface stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Jul;30(4):844–858. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.4.844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stoney S. D., Jr, Thompson W. D., Asanuma H. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Sep;31(5):659–669. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsukahara N., Fuller D. R., Brooks V. B. Collateral pyramidal influences on the corticorubrospinal system. J Neurophysiol. 1968 May;31(3):467–484. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.3.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES