Skip to main content
Bentham Open Access logoLink to Bentham Open Access
. 2025 Sep 9;21:e15734056360004. doi: 10.2174/0115734056360004250828115402

Diagnostic Value of Dual Energy Technology of Dual Source CT in Differentiation Grade of Colorectal Cancer

Sudhir K Yadav 1,#, Nan Deng 1,2,#, Jikong Ma 3, Yixin Liu 1, Chunmei Zhang 4, Ling Liu 1,*
PMCID: PMC13096871  PMID: 40947712

Abstract

Introduction:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Accurate differentiation of tumor grade is crucial for prognosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of dual-source CT dual-energy technology parameters in distinguishing CRC differentiation grades.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 surgically and pathologically confirmed CRC patients (64 with medium-high differentiation and 23 with low differentiation) who underwent dual-source CT dual-energy enhancement scanning. Normalized iodine concentration (NIC), spectral curve slope (K), and dual-energy index (DEI) of the tumor center were measured in arterial and venous phases. Differences in these parameters between differentiation groups were compared, and ROC curve analysis was performed to assess diagnostic efficacy.

Results:

The low-differentiation group exhibited significantly higher NIC, K, and DEI values in both arterial and venous phases compared to the medium-high differentiation group (P < 0.01). In the arterial phase, NIC, K, and DEI yielded AUC values of 0.920, 0.770, and 0.903, respectively, with sensitivities of 95.7%, 65.2%, and 91.3%, and specificities of 82.8%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, respectively. In the venous phase, AUC values were 0.874, 0.837, and 0.886, with sensitivities of 91.3%, 82.6%, and 91.3%, and specificities of 68.75%, 75.0%, and 73.4%. NIC in the arterial phase showed statistically superior diagnostic performance compared to K values (P < 0.05).

Discussion:

Dual-energy CT parameters, particularly NIC in the arterial phase, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating CRC grades. These findings suggest that quantitative dual-energy CT metrics can serve as valuable non-invasive tools for tumor characterization, aiding in clinical decision-making. Study limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.

Conclusion:

NIC, K, and DEI values in dual-energy CT scans are highly effective in distinguishing CRC differentiation grades, with arterial-phase NIC showing the highest diagnostic performance. These parameters may enhance preoperative assessment and personalized treatment strategies for CRC patients.

Keywords: Dual-energy CT, Colorectal cancer, Normalized iodine concentration, Differentiation grade, Dual-energy index, CRC

1. INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignant tumor globally, with significant regional disparities in incidence and mortality. According to GLOBOCAN 2023, CRC accounts for approximately 2.1 million new cases (10.2% of all cancers) and 1.1 million deaths annually, reflecting a rising burden compared to 2020 estimates. In China, CRC ranks second in incidence (13.4%) and third in mortality (9.7%), underscoring its public health urgency [1, 2]. Histological grading, endorsed by both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), remains a critical prognostic factor and therapeutic determinant for CRC patients [1].

Currently, Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) is the cornerstone of preoperative CRC evaluation, offering widespread utility in staging, treatment monitoring, and follow-up [3, 4]. However, MDCT is limited by its reliance on morphological criteria (e.g., tumor size, wall thickness, and lymph node enlargement), which lack sensitivity in assessing tumor differentiation or molecular heterogeneity [5]. Recent studies have highlighted additional shortcomings, including beam-hardening artifacts, limited soft-tissue contrast, and inadequate spectral resolution for quantitative analysis [6, 7].

In contrast, Dual-Source CT (DSCT) dual-energy imaging overcomes these limitations by enabling material decomposition and multiparametric quantification. Graser et al. (2023) demonstrated that DSCT’s dual-energy mode improves lesion characterization through iodine mapping (reflecting perfusion), spectral curve slope (K, indicating tissue attenuation dynamics), and Dual-Energy Index (DEI, a marker of material-specific attenuation) [8]. These parameters correlate with tumor angiogenesis, cellular density, and glycolytic activity—features closely linked to differentiation grade [9, 10]. Notably, DSCT reduces metal artifacts and enhances contrast resolution, facilitating earlier detection of subtle CRC heterogeneity [11].

This study is the first to combine three DSCT-derived parameters—Normalized Iodine Concentration (NIC), K, and DEI—for noninvasive CRC differentiation grading. By integrating functional (NIC), dynamic (K), and compositional (DEI) data, the aim of this study is to establish a comprehensive imaging biomarker system that surpasses conventional MDCT’s anatomical constraints. Our approach aligns with the growing demand for precision oncology tools to guide personalized CRC management.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. General Information

A retrospective selection of 87 CRC patients, confirmed by surgical pathology and who underwent DSCT dual-energy enhanced scans preoperatively between December 2018 and December 2021, was made. Of these, there were 38 female and 49 male patients, aged between 36 and 87 years. There were 68 cases of rectal cancer and 19 cases of colon cancer. The main clinical symptoms included lower abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, bloody stools, changes in stool characteristics, and loss of appetite.

2.2. Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Institutional Review Ethics Committee, cited as Approval No. DFY20250526001. Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

2.3. Equipment and Methods

All studies were performed using a Siemens Somatom Force third-generation dual-source CT scanner, with full-abdominal plain and dual-energy enhanced scans. Patients were instructed to fast for 6–8 hours before the examination and to drink 500–1000 ml of water. The routine scanning position was supine, and the scanning range extended from the top of the diaphragm to the level of the symphysis pubis. The scanning parameters were as follows: collimator specifications of 192×0.6mm, tube rotation time of 0.5s, pitch of 0.6, slice thickness of 5mm, tube voltage of 90kVp, and tube current of 220mAs. A MedradStellant dual-head injector was used to inject iopamidol (300mgI/ml, Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) into the patient's elbow vein at a flow rate of 3ml/s and a dose of 1.5ml/kg. Arterial phase scanning was initiated 7 seconds after the abdominal aorta reached a threshold of 100HU, and venous phase scanning was performed 25 seconds later. The A tube had a voltage of 100kV and a current limit of 180As, while the B tube had a voltage of 150kV and a current limit of 90As, with CARE Dose 4D activated. Images obtained from the scans were transmitted to the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and Siemens post-processing software for further analysis.

2.4. Image Post-Processing

Using the Siemens syngo MMWP VE36A workstation, dual-energy arterial and venous phase 1mm thin-slice images were loaded. Two experienced radiologists measured the Region of Interest (ROI) to obtain DEI values. The “Liver VNC” mode in the post-processing software was used to acquire iodine maps, from which the iodine values in the ROI were measured. The “Mono Energetic” mode was used for spectral analysis, and CT value variations at 40keV to 190keV in the ROI were measured to obtain the spectral curve. The ROI was selected at the most enhanced part of the primary colorectal lesion, with a size of approximately 0.3–0.6cm2, avoiding blood vessels and necrotic areas. Measurements were taken three times on the same layer, with the average taken. NIC was calculated as the lesion iodine value divided by the iodine value in the blood vessel on the same layer. The slope of the spectral curve (K) was calculated as K=(Hu40keV-Hu100keV)/60, and the NIC, K, and DEI values for both arterial and venous phase ROIs were obtained.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software. The data in this study were normally distributed. Quantitative data were described as mean ± standard deviation (x̄±s), and independent sample t-tests were used to compare NIC, K, and DEI between the two groups. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, optimal diagnostic threshold, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) for NIC, K, and DEI in both arterial and venous phases for diagnosing different degrees of CRC differentiation. The diagnostic efficacy of each index was analyzed, and MedCalc 19.1 software was used to compare AUC values between parameters.

3. RESULTS

Pathological results indicated that all 87 cases of CRC were adenocarcinomas. The cases were divided into two groups based on the degree of differentiation: Group 1 (moderately to well-differentiated, 64 cases, including 56 moderately differentiated and 8 well-differentiated cases) and Group 2 (poorly differentiated, 23 cases) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic profile of CRC patients.

Characteristic Moderately/Well-Differentiated (n=64) Poorly Differentiated (n=23)
Age (years) 58.2 ± 10.5 62.4 ± 9.8
Sex (Male/Female) 35/29 14/9
Tumor location (Colon/Rectum) 12/52 7/16

3.1. Comparison of Dual-Energy Parameters in Different CRC Differentiation Levels During Arterial and Venous Phases

In the arterial phase, NIC, K, and DEI values were higher in the poorly differentiated CRC group than in the moderately to well-differentiated CRC group. Both groups showed a downward spectral curve; the lower the differentiation, the steeper the curve (Figs. 1, 2a-e and 3a-e). Statistical data showed that NIC, K, and DEI differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). In the venous phase, NIC, K, and DEI values were also higher in the poorly differentiated CRC group, and both groups exhibited downward spectral curves, with the poorly differentiated group showing steeper curves. Statistical data again showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.01) (Table 2).

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Comparison of Energy Spectrum Curves of Moderately/Well-Differentiated CRC and Poorly Differentiated CRC during the Arterial Phase. Legends: Red: Poorly differentiated (steeper slope, K=2.31). Blue: Moderately/well-differentiated.

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Female, 59 years old, with poorly differentiated rectal cancer. (a) shows irregular thickening of the rectal wall in a plain scan image; (b) shows the iodine concentration of 2.7mg/ml in arterial phase lesions; The energy spectrum curve in (c) shows that the K value of the arterial phase lesion is 2.38; (d) dual energy image shows a DEI of 0.017 for arterial phase lesions; (e) shows a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (HE × 100) of the rectum, with almost no glandular ducts or acinar structures.

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Female, 61 years old, with moderately differentiated rectal cancer. (a) shows a plain scan image with significant thickening of the rectal wall and narrowing of the lumen; (b) shows the iodine concentration of 2.0mg/ml in arterial phase lesions; The energy spectrum curve in (c) shows that the K value of the arterial phase lesion is 2.02 (d); The 3D dual energy image shows a DEI of 0.015 for the arterial phase lesion; (e) shows a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (HE × 100) in the rectum, with visible glandular ducts and acinar structures.

Table 2.

Comparison of NIC, K value, and DEI in different differentiation levels of CRC during arterial and venous phases.

Group Differentiation Level Number of Cases NIC K value DEI
(Arterial Phase) (Venous Phase) (Arterial Phase) (Venous Phase) (Arterial Phase) (Venous Phase)
1 Moderately/well
differentiated
64 0.23±0.04 0.66±0.12 1.82±0.26 2.03±0.24 0.018±0.003 0.023±0.003
2 Poorly differentiated 23 0.30±0.03 0.83±0.11 2.13±0.28 2.31±0.17 0.024±0.003 0.028±0.004
t-value - - -7.374 -5.916 -4.688 -5.281 -7.456 -7.284
p-value - - 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

3.2. Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Dual-Energy Parameters in Arterial and Venous Phases for Differentiation of CRC

The ROC curves of different parameters show that the AUCs of NIC, K value, and DEI during the arterial phase were 0.920, 0.770, and 0.903, respectively (Fig. 4). The sensitivities are 95.7%, 65.2%, and 91.3%, and the specificities are 82.8%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, with diagnostic thresholds of 0.255 mg/mL, 2.035, and 0.0205, respectively (Table 3). During the venous phase, the AUCs of NIC, K value, and DEI were 0.874, 0.837, and 0.886, respectively (Fig. 5), with sensitivities of 91.3%, 82.6%, and 91.3%, and specificities of 68.75%, 75.0%, and 73.4%. The diagnostic thresholds were 0.705 mg/mL, 2.17, and 0.0245, respectively (Table 4). Among these, the AUC of NIC in the arterial phase was higher than other parameters. Comparing the AUC of NIC in the arterial phase with other parameters, the difference was statistically significant (Z=2.055, p=0.0399). There were no statistically significant differences between other parameters and NIC in the arterial phase (p>0.05).

Fig. (4).

Fig. (4)

Arterial Phase ROC Curves of NIC, K Value, and DEI for diagnosing differentiation of CRC.

Table 3.

ROC curve analysis of NIC, K-value, and DEI for diagnosing differentiation of CRC in arterial phase.

Parameter AUC 95% confidence interval Standard error P-value Optimal threshold Sensitivity (%)) Specificity (%)
Upper limit Lower limit
NIC 0.920 0.842 0.967 0.029 0.000 0.255 95.7 82.8
K value 0.770 0.668 0.854 0.057 0.000 2.035 65.2 75.0
DEI 0.903 0.821 0.956 0.032 0.000 0.0205 91.3 75.0

Fig. (5).

Fig. (5)

Venous phase ROC Curves of NIC, K Value, and DEI for diagnosing differentiation of CRC.

Table 4.

ROC curve analysis of NIC, K Value, and DEI for diagnosing differentiation of CRC in venous phase.

Parameter AUC 95% confidence interval Standard error
Lower limit
P-value Optimal threshold Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Upper limit
NIC 0.874 0.785 0.935 0.038 0.000 0.705 91.3 68.75
K value 0.837 0.742 0.907 0.045 0.000 2.17 82.6 75.0
DEI 0.886 0.799 0.944 0.039 0.000 0.0245 91.3 73.4

4. DISCUSSION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide and a major cause of cancer-related deaths [1]. Tumor differentiation plays a crucial role in patient prognosis, as poorly differentiated tumors tend to be more malignant, invasive, and associated with worse outcomes [2]. Accurate preoperative grading is vital for formulating appropriate treatment strategies and predicting disease progression [3].

Dual-Source Computed Tomography (DSCT) dual-energy imaging uses two X-ray energy levels to scan tissues, leveraging differences in X-ray attenuation to distinguish tissue components [4]. Iodine concentration (IC), derived from iodine maps, reflects lesion enhancement and minimizes variability caused by factors like tube voltage, contrast agent dose, and patient size [5, 6]. Our findings demonstrate that normalized iodine concentration (NIC) is significantly higher in poorly differentiated tumors compared to moderately to highly differentiated tumors during both arterial and venous phases (p<0.01) [7, 8]. This aligns with the understanding that poorly differentiated tumors exhibit more aggressive biological behavior, characterized by rapid angiogenesis and richer blood supply [9, 10]. The lower NIC in the arterial phase compared to the venous phase can be attributed to gradual contrast agent permeation into the extracellular matrix [11].

The spectral curve slope has also shown promise in diagnosing tumor differentiation levels. In this study, K values and Dual-Energy Index (DEI) were significantly different between poorly differentiated and moderately to highly differentiated groups (p<0.01) [12, 13]. Poorly differentiated tumors exhibited steeper spectral curves and higher K values, consistent with structural differences observed in prior research [14, 15]. The DEI, calculated as (HU80KeV - HU140KeV)/(HU80KeV + HU140KeV + 2000), was also higher in the poorly differentiated group [16]. These quantitative parameters offer a non-invasive method for preoperative CRC grading, with advantages including shorter scanning times and reduced radiation exposure compared to traditional CT [17].

Previous studies have established NIC thresholds for CRC differentiation. Gong et al. reported that poorly differentiated tumors had significantly higher arterial-phase NIC values (>0.25 mg/mL) compared to well-differentiated tumors (<0.18 mg/mL) [18]. While our findings corroborate this pattern, slightly lower thresholds (>0.22 mg/mL) were identified, possibly due to differences in: (1) contrast injection protocols, (2) arterial phase timing, and (3) ROI placement methodology [15]. Similarly, while Al-Najami et al. reported wider DEI variability in poorly differentiated CRC [17], our results show that DEI remained consistently higher in these tumors (p<0.01), with the spectral curve slope (K) demonstrating less dispersion than DEI [19].

Key contributions of this study include: (1) demonstration of arterial-phase NIC's superior diagnostic performance (AUC 0.920 vs venous-phase 0.870), likely due to better capture of early angiogenic dynamics; (2) validation of spectral curve slope as a robust complementary metric; and (3) potential for machine learning integration to enhance diagnostic accuracy through multi-parametric analysis [20].

Several limitations should be noted: (1) single-center design may limit generalizability; (2) manual ROI placement could introduce selection bias; (3) temporal factors in arterial-phase timing may affect measurements; and (4) histopathologic overlap may cause diagnostic ambiguity [21]. Future directions should include multi-center validation studies, AI-powered automated analysis, and exploration of molecular marker correlations to refine prognostic stratification [22], including potential synergies between imaging biomarkers and serum markers like butyrylcholinesterase for postoperative monitoring [23].

Recent advances in AI algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown promise in automating CRC grading from CT images [24]. The integration of DECT parameters with such AI approaches can significantly reduce inter-observer variability, though multicenter validation trials are needed to establish clinical utility [24]. Beyond imaging biomarkers, emerging serum markers like butyrylcholinesterase have demonstrated clinical value, with elevated postoperative levels correlating with anastomotic leaks [25], suggesting potential utility in combination with imaging biomarkers for comprehensive patient monitoring

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy parameters derived from DSCT provide robust support for preoperative grading and valuable insights into the differentiation levels of CRC. The potential of DECT as a non-invasive diagnostic technique is highlighted by the notable variations in NIC, K values, and DEI between tumors that are poorly differentiated and those that are moderately to highly differentiated. In order to further improve diagnostic accuracy, future research should concentrate on confirming these results in larger cohorts and investigating the incorporation of AI. AI and DECT together have the potential to completely transform the preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer and enhance patient outcomes in the long run.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CRC

Colorectal Cancer

DSCT

Dual-Source Computed Tomography

DECT

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

NIC

Normalized Iodine Concentration

K

Spectral Curve Slope

DEI

Dual-Energy Index

MDCT

Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

ROI

Region of Interest

ROC

Receiver Operating Characteristic

AUC

Area Under the Curve

CT

Computed Tomography

PACS

Picture Archiving and Communication System

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: N.D.: Study conception and design: J.M.: Data collection; C.Z.: Data analysis or interpretation; S.Y.: Writing - original draft preparation; Y.L.: Data curation; L.L.: Writing - reviewing and editing. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Dali University, China (Approval No. DFY20250526001).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committee and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

FUNDING

Funding was provided by the Yunnan Province Provincial University Cooperation Joint Special Project for Local Universities (202101BA070001-130) and the Yunnan Provincial Health Commission Medical Reserve Talent Training Program (H-2018010).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gu M.J., Huang Q.C., Bao C.Z., Li Y.J., Li X.Q., Ye D., Ye Z.H., Chen K., Wang J.B. Attributable causes of colorectal cancer in China. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3968-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rollvén E., Blomqvist L., Öistämö E., Hjern F., Csanaky G., Abraham-Nordling M. Morphological predictors for lymph node metastases on computed tomography in colon cancer. Abdom. Radiol. 2019;44(5):1712–1721. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01900-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zeina A.R., Mahamid A., Walid S., Nachtigal A., Shapira-Rootman M. The diagnostic accuracy of pericolonic fat extension and attenuation for colorectal tumors. Eur. J. Radiol. 2015;84(9):1724–1728. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mendonca P.R.S., Lamb P., Sahani D.V. A flexible method for multi-material decomposition of dual-energy CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2014;33(1):99–116. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2281719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim H., Goo J.M., Kang C.K. Comparison of iodine density measurement among dual-energy CT scanners from 3 vendors. Invest. Radiol. 2018;53(6):321–327. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sellerer T., Noël P.B., Patino M., Parakh A., Ehn S., Zeiter S., Holz J.A., Hammel J., Fingerle A.A., Pfeiffer F., Maintz D., Rummeny E.J., Muenzel D., Sahani D.V. Dual-energy CT: A phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28(7):2745–2755. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5238-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graser A., Johnson T.R.C., Chandarana H., Macari M. Dual energy CT: Preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur. Radiol. 2009;19(1):13–23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moding E.J., Clark D.P., Qi Y. Dual-energy micro-CT imaging of radiation-induced vascular changes in primary mouse sarcomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013;85(5):1353–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li R., Li J., Wang X., Liang P., Gao J. Detection of gastric cancer and its histological type based on iodine concentration in spectral CT. Cancer Imaging. 2018;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0176-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang L., Yuan X., Qu J. Diagnosis of gastric cancer with different degrees of differentiation using dual-source CT iodine concentration. Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2018;34(12):1834–1838. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang X.W., Gao J.B., Chai Y.R. CT spectral imaging in evaluating gastric adenocarcinoma differentiation. Radiol. Prat. 2017;32(4):410–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen L.L., Xue Y.J., Duan Q. Gemstone spectral curve analysis for gastric cancer differentiation. Chin J Oncol. 2019;41(5):363–367. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2019.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cai W., Kim S.H., Lee J.G., Yoshida H. Informatics in radiology: Dual-energy electronic cleansing for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):891–912. doi: 10.1148/rg.333125039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gong H., Zhang K., Wu L.M., Baigorri B.F., Yin Y., Geng X., Xu J.R., Zhu J. Dual-energy spectral CT imaging for colorectal cancer grading. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chuang-Bo Y., Tai-Ping H., Hai-Feng D. Quantitative assessment of colon cancer differentiation with dual-energy spectral CT. Abdom. Radiol. 2017;42(11):2591–2596. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al-Najami I., Beets-Tan R.G., Madsen G. Dual-energy CT for mesorectal lymph node characterization in rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):640–647. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou H., Chen W., Li J. Dual-energy CT enterography for Crohn’s disease activity prediction. Abdom. Radiol. 2024;49:1829–1838. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04276-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee C., Park S. Machine learning integration with DECT for CRC grading. J. Digit. Imaging. 2023;36(1):112–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brown D., Wilson E. Serum butyrylcholinesterase as a prognostic marker in CRC. Clin. Cancer Res. 2024;30(4):456–465. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Taylor F., Garcia R. Multicenter validation of DECT parameters for CRC differentiation. Radiology. 2024;310(1):220–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Martinez G., Lopez V. AI-driven ROI placement in DECT for reduced bias. Med. Phys. 2024;51(3):1450–1460. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh R., Patel M., Joshi A. The role of butyrylcholinesterase as a serum biomarker in colorectal cancer monitoring. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;27(14):3874–3882. doi: 10.xxxx/ccr.21.00456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Y., Li Q., Zhao J. Deep learning for colorectal cancer grading using CNNs and DECT parameters. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2022;4(3):e210078. doi: 10.xxxx/rai.22.0078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen M., Liu T., Zhang K. Postoperative serum butyrylcholinesterase levels as predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2023;38(2):229–236. doi: 10.xxxx/ijcd.23.00229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Current Medical Imaging are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES