Skip to main content
Society for Endocrinology Open Access logoLink to Society for Endocrinology Open Access
. 2026 Apr 13;269(1):e250295. doi: 10.1530/JOE-25-0295

The CXCL13 hub in obesity-related metabolic inflammation: regulation of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and targeted strategies

Mengke Huang 1, Xiaolin Chen 1, Yongmei Jiang 1,, Ting Liu 1,2,
PMCID: PMC13097124  PMID: 41885315

Abstract

C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) is a crucial regulator of lymphoid tissue development and immune function. It orchestrates homeostasis in secondary lymphoid organs, inflammatory responses in tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), and immunometabolic balance within fat-associated lymphoid clusters (FALCs) by mediating the homing of CXCR5+ cells and activating stromal cells. In the context of obesity-related metabolic inflammation, CXCL13 acts as a central hub of immunometabolic dysregulation, driving pathological processes across multiple organs with significant organ- and stage-specific heterogeneity, which reflects spatiotemporal heterogeneity. It mediates the pathological transformation of FALCs in adipose tissue, inducing insulin resistance; promotes TLS formation within pancreatic islets, accelerating β-cell destruction; dynamically regulates atherosclerotic plaque stability in the blood vessels; and undergoes a functional shift from compensatory suppression to profibrotic and procarcinogenic roles during the progression of liver disease. The effects of CXCL13 are highly dependent on the local microenvironment, exhibiting both pro-inflammatory and repair-suppressive effects in diabetic complications. Although targeted therapies show experimental promise, the context-dependent functions of CXCL13 – encompassing both physiological protection and pathological disruption – along with its organ and stage specificity, necessitate spatiotemporally precise interventions. This review systematically elucidates the pivotal role of CXCL13 in obesity-related metabolic inflammation, providing a theoretical foundation for the development of precision intervention strategies tailored to disease subtypes, stages, and specific organ targeting.

Keywords: CXCL13, obesity, metabolic inflammation, SLO, TLS, FALC

Introduction

Chemokines are a class of structurally highly conserved small peptide molecules. Based on the position of cysteine residues at their N-terminus, they are classified into four subfamilies: CXC, CC, XC, and CX3C (1, 2). These molecules are secreted by various cell types upon induction or are constitutively expressed (3). C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), also known as B cell-attracting chemokine 1 or B lymphocyte chemoattractant, is a homeostatic chemokine that belongs to the CXC subgroup and represents the most potent chemoattractant for B cells (4, 5). C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CXCR5), also referred to as Burkitt’s lymphoma receptor 1, is the sole known receptor for CXCL13 (5). It is primarily expressed on B cells, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, and migratory dendritic cells (DCs) (6, 7). Tfh cells are specialized helpers for B cells, supporting B cell differentiation, antibody production, and germinal center (GCs) reactions through cytokines and co-stimulatory signals (8).

Under physiological conditions, CXCL13 is primarily expressed by stromal cells and Tfh cells, serving as a key regulator of lymphoid tissue structure development and immune function (9, 10). It directs the homing of B cells and Tfh cells to the follicular zones of secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) (including lymph nodes, spleen, tonsils, Peyer’s patches, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue) (9, 11). CXCL13 collaborates with C-C motif chemokine ligands 19 and 21 (CCL19 and CCL21) to establish T–B cell compartmentalization, promotes B cell positioning within GCs, facilitates T–B cell interactions, and supports antibody affinity maturation (12, 13, 14). Within body cavities (such as the peritoneal and pleural cavities), macrophages and mesothelial cells constitutively express CXCL13, recruiting B1 cells to home to fat-associated lymphoid clusters (FALCs) (15, 16). This process mediates the production of natural IgM antibodies, providing early immune defense (16, 17). Studies using CXCL13 gene-deficient models (CXCL13−/− mice) have confirmed its essential physiological functions, demonstrating SLO hypoplasia and defective localization and function of B1 cells within FALCs (18, 19).

Under chronic inflammatory stimuli, such as autoimmune diseases, infections, and tumors, activated stromal cells, T peripheral helper (Tph) cells, and macrophages in non-lymphoid tissues exhibit aberrant CXCL13 overexpression – termed ectopic CXCL13 expression (12, 20, 21). This induces elevated plasma CXCL13 levels correlating with inflammatory activity (22, 23). Ectopic CXCL13 collaborates with chemokines such as CCL21 to recruit CXCR5+ lymphocytes to non-lymphoid tissues, driving the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) containing GCs (24, 25). TLSs initiate local immune responses independently of SLOs: they confer protection by enhancing pathogen clearance during infections, yet promote pathology by exacerbating tissue damage in chronic inflammation (26). CXCL13 levels positively correlate with TLS maturity and disease severity, while CXCR5 deficiency abolishes TLS formation in mice (27). Notably, FALCs in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) undergo TLS-like remodeling upon inflammatory stimulation, characterized by increased number, size, and GC formation (28).

CXCL13, a key mediator of chronic inflammation, is increasingly recognized as a central hub in obesity-associated metabolic inflammation. Obesity – defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 – affects over 1 billion people worldwide (29). Its core pathology involves chronic low-grade systemic inflammation triggered by abnormal adipose tissue expansion (30). This unique metabolic inflammation (distinct from infectious or autoimmune inflammation) persistently activates innate immunity, disrupts metabolic homeostasis, and targets organs including the pancreas, liver, blood vessels, and adipose tissue (31, 32, 33). Consequently, it drives the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and atherosclerosis (AS) (34, 35, 36). Within the obese microenvironment, infiltrating immune cells dysregulate chemokine networks (including CXCL13, CCL19, and CCL21), promoting pathological TLS neogenesis or aberrant FALC expansion, thereby exacerbating tissue damage (31, 37). The profound crosstalk between inflammatory and metabolic signaling offers new perspectives on obesity-related multi-organ complications. A comprehensive elucidation of the dynamic regulation of CXCL13 in lymphoid structure formation and organ-specific inflammation is essential for unraveling the pathological heterogeneity of obesity-associated diseases and advancing precision interventions.

CXCL13: the orchestrator of constitutive and inducible lymphoid structures

CXCL13 functions as a crucial regulatory chemokine that orchestrates lymphoid immune functions by governing the development and operation of various lymphoid structures through the recruitment of CXCR5+ immune cells and the activation of stromal cell networks. These structures are categorized into three main types based on their developmental origins and microenvironmental characteristics: embryonically programmed SLOs, inflammation-induced ectopic TLSs, and FALCs residing in metabolically active VAT (Table 1). CXCL13 exhibits distinct regulatory patterns across these structures: it maintains homeostatic architecture in SLOs, drives inflammatory cascades in TLSs, and precisely regulates immunometabolic switching in FALCs. This functional heterogeneity provides critical mechanistic insights into the immunopathology of obesity-associated metabolic inflammation while establishing a foundation for precision-targeted therapeutic strategies against CXCL13.

Table 1.

CXCL13-mediated heterogeneity in lymphoid structures: comparative analysis of developmental and functional features across SLOs, TLSs, and fat-associated lymphoid clusters.

Characteristics SLOs TLSs FALCs
Structural organization Highly structured: contains GCs, distinct T/B cell zones, FDC networks, FRC networks, conduits, HEVs, and a complete lymphatic vessel system Highly structured: contains GCs, distinct T/B cell zones, FDC networks, FRC networks, and HEVs; may partially develop conduits and lymphatic vessels Steady state: loose cellular aggregates lacking GCs, distinct T/B zones, FDC networks, HEVs, conduits, and lymphatic vessels
Inflammation/infection: develops GCs, T/B zones, and HEVs; remains devoid of FDC networks, conduits, and lymphatic vessels
Capsule presence Present in spleen, lymph nodes, and tonsils (physically separating them from the tissue microenvironment); absent in PPs and MALTs (directly exposed to the tissue microenvironment) Absent (directly exposed to the local inflammatory microenvironment) Absent (directly exposed to the tissue microenvironment)
Distribution Systemically distributed Chronic inflammatory foci within non-lymphoid organs/tissues (under persistent inflammation) Within visceral VAT (e.g., greater omentum and mesentery)
Developmental timeline Embryonically programmed (pre-established developmental pathways) Postnatally induced by persistent local inflammatory signals (within affected tissues) Steady state: postnatally induced, shaped by commensal microbiota
Inflammation/infection: driven by local inflammatory signals
Formation mechanism Dependent on CXCL13 and LTβR signaling secreted by LTi cells and LTo cells Dependent on CXCL13 and LTβR signaling secreted by mature immunofibroblasts Dependent on CXCL13 signaling secreted by stromal cells and macrophages, coordinated by ILC2s
Primary functions Systemic adaptive immunity or mucosal immune defense; clearance of self-reactive lymphocytes Localized adaptive immune responses in non-lymphoid tissues (under chronic inflammation); defective peripheral tolerance with autoantibody production Localized adaptive immune responses within serosal cavities (e.g., peritoneal and pleural spaces)
Clinical implications Foundation of systemic immune homeostasis Context-dependent disease modulator: protective roles: anti-tumor and anti-infection immunity Regulation of immunometabolic homeostasis and serosal cavity immune defense
Pathological roles: aggravation of autoimmune disorders

SLO, secondary lymphoid organ; TLS, tertiary lymphoid structure; FALC, fat-associated lymphoid cluster; GCs, germinal centers; FDC, follicular dendritic cell; FRC, fibroblastic reticular cell; HEVs, high endothelial venules; PPs, Peyer’s patches; MALTs, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; LTi, lymphoid tissue inducer; LTo, lymphoid tissue organizer; and ILC2s, innate lymphoid cells type 2.

SLOs

SLOs are permanent structures developmentally programmed during embryogenesis, providing the essential architectural foundation for systemic immune responses. Their development initiates with lymphoid tissue organizer (LTo) cells – also termed stromal organizer cells – which secrete CXCL13 to recruit CXCR5-expressing lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells, forming primitive cell clusters (Fig. 1, SLO) (18). The lymphotoxin alpha1/beta2 heterotrimer (LTα1β2) on LTi cell surfaces binds to the lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTβR) on LTo cells, activating a core positive feedback loop. This signaling upregulates the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), and chemokines (including CXCL13, CCL19, and CCL21) by LTo cells (38). This process not only sustains recruitment and retention of immune cells but also induces differentiation of LTo cells into stromal subpopulations such as follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) and fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) (38, 39). Ultimately, mature SLO structures emerge, including GCs, segregated T/B cell zones, high endothelial venules (HEVs), and fully developed lymphatic vessel systems.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CXCL13 dynamically regulates the functions of three types of lymphoid structures: it maintains homeostatic architecture in SLOs, drives inflammatory ectopic aggregation in TLSs, and mediates the transition of fat-associated lymphoid clusters from physiological barrier protection to inflammatory immune responses. A full color version of this figure is available at https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-25-0295.

Continuous lymphocyte circulation between the bloodstream and SLOs is mediated by two specialized vascular systems: HEVs and lymphatic vessels. In mature SLOs (excluding the spleen), lymphocyte infiltration primarily occurs through HEVs via a tightly regulated multistep cascade (40). First, peripheral node addressin (PNAd) expressed on HEVs binds to leukocyte selectin (L-selectin) on lymphocytes, mediating rolling adhesion (41, 42). Subsequently, CXCL13 (predominantly secreted by stromal cells) and CCL21 (mainly produced by endothelial cells) presented on the luminal surfaces of HEVs activate the lymphocyte integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1), promoting its binding to endothelial intercellular adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 for firm adhesion (43, 44). Ultimately, lymphocytes transmigrate across the endothelium into the SLOs. Lymphocyte positioning within SLOs is finely regulated by chemokine gradients. CXCL13 guides naïve B cells to follicles along FRC networks via CXCR5, while CCL21 and CCL19 direct naïve T cells to T-cell zones along FRC networks via C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) (45, 46). In this process, stromal cells execute essential organizational functions. FRCs in T-cell zones form conduit systems that coordinate T-cell migration, dendritic cell interactions, and the transport of small antigens (47, 48). FDCs constitutively express high levels of CXCL13, which is crucial for B-cell retention in follicles, B-cell activation, and GC reactions (including somatic hypermutation and class switching) (4, 49, 50). Additionally, the lymphatic vessels throughout the entire SLOs form a complete dynamic drainage network – ranging from afferent lymphatics to subcapsular sinuses to efferent lymphatics – efficiently performing the functions of transporting and recycling antigens and specific immune cells, mainly migratory DCs, along with a small number of naïve T cells and effector memory T cells (46, 51).

Under inflammatory stimulation, SLOs undergo adaptive remodeling characterized by HEV expansion and upregulated adhesion molecule expression, promoting massive infiltration of naïve lymphocytes, effector T cells, and monocytes (52). Simultaneously, increased afferent lymphatic flow delivers abundant mature DCs, while lymphocyte egress obstruction synergistically expands the SLO immunocyte reservoir, significantly enhancing antigen presentation efficiency (53). Notably, the inflammatory microenvironment induces CXCL13 upregulation that accelerates B-cell follicular aggregation, thus augmenting immune surveillance capacity (18). As central hubs of immune homeostasis, SLOs utilize highly specialized stromal cells to precisely orchestrate key molecules, including CXCL13, directing orderly immune cell migration, positioning, and interactions – this dynamically tunable regulatory scaffold provides a central reference framework for understanding TLS formation induced by inflammation.

TLSs

TLSs are transient ectopic lymphoid aggregates developing within non-lymphoid tissues in response to chronic inflammatory stimuli – such as autoimmune diseases, infections, cancer, or aging – that typically resolve upon inflammation subsidence (54, 55). Although exhibiting SLO-like architectural features, including GCs, segregated T/B cell zones, FDC networks, and HEVs, they lack fibrous capsules and complete lymphatic vessel systems (56). As a result, they are directly exposed to antigens and damage signals in local inflammatory microenvironments, which may provoke heightened regional immune responses (57). CXCL13 serves as the core organizer of TLS formation, orchestrating the entire process from initiation and expansion to functional maturation.

TLS formation initiates with inflammatory reprogramming of tissue-resident fibroblasts. Prolonged stimulation of these fibroblasts by cytokines, including interleukin-13 (IL-13), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-22 (IL-22), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), leads to their transformation into immunofibroblasts (Fig. 1, TLS) (58, 59). Functionally analogous to LTo cells in SLOs, these immunofibroblasts highly express chemokines (CXCL13, CCL19, and CCL21) and adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1), recruiting naïve B and T cells to sites of inflammation (20, 21, 37, 60, 61). The recruited B cells secrete CXCL13 and synergize with LTα1β2 and IL-17 to activate the non-canonical nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway, driving immunofibroblast proliferation and differentiation into FDCs (56, 62). The formation of FDCs further amplifies CXCL13 secretion, establishing a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop that accelerates TLS maturation. Additionally, immunofibroblasts may differentiate into FRCs supporting T-cell activation, although their differentiation mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated.

Lymphocyte aggregate expansion depends on synergistic interactions among diverse immune cells. In this process, the secretion of CXCL13 by stromal cells – including immunofibroblasts and FRCs – initiates lymphocyte clustering (63). Subsequently, recruited macrophages, T cells, and nascent FDCs become essential supplementary CXCL13 sources (55, 56). The CXCL13–CXCR5 axis selectively recruits B cells, Tfh cells, and macrophages, while these recruited cells feedback-secrete CXCL13, establishing a transcellular cooperative positive feedback circuit that continuously amplifies the chemokine gradient, promoting further lymphocyte aggregation and structural maintenance (12, 64, 65, 66). Specifically, B cells persistently produce CXCL13 within follicles, whereas T cells enhance CXCL13 expression through factors such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) (67). Within these aggregates, Tfh cells directly drive B-cell differentiation into GC B cells through interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-21 (IL-21), and co-stimulatory molecules, facilitating antibody affinity maturation (68, 69). Notably, due to absent central tolerance mechanisms, autoreactive B cells generated therein fail to be effectively eliminated, predisposing to pathogenic autoantibody production.

The structural maturation of TLSs endows them with adaptive immune functionality. Hallmarks of mature TLSs include the formation of functional HEVs and networks of FDCs within GCs. HEVs develop through the transformation of local vascular endothelial cells under the influence of LTβR signaling (70). These vessels mediate the continuous infiltration of lymphocytes from the bloodstream to sustain chronic inflammation (70). At the mature stage, FDCs emerge as the primary producers of CXCL13 within GCs (63). They develop via LTβR and tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) signaling pathways, constitutively expressing high levels of CXCL13 to retain B cells and capture antigens, thereby supporting GC reactions (56, 62). Although ductal and lymphatic structures are present in some mature TLSs, their function relies primarily on HEV-mediated cell infiltration and local chemokine concentration gradients due to the absence of a complete drainage network (71, 72). Ultimately, mature TLSs establish a functional local immune microenvironment capable of antigen presentation (mediated chiefly by DCs and B cells), lymphocyte activation, clonal expansion, and memory formation, thus executing local adaptive immune responses (72, 73).

The presence of TLSs is a hallmark of persistent chronic inflammation, and their functionality is highly dependent on the disease context. In infections or tumors, TLSs contribute to pathogen clearance and anti-tumor immunity by enhancing local antigen presentation efficiency and antibody production (72). Conversely, in autoimmune diseases, this localized adaptive immune response – particularly the production of autoantibodies – exacerbates tissue damage (23). Consequently, CXCL13, a key driver of TLS formation and maintenance, exhibits expression levels that directly correlate with structural maturity, inflammation severity, and disease progression (63). Targeting the CXCL13–CXCR5 axis has thus emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for intervening in TLS development, modulating local immune responses, and treating associated diseases.

FALCs

FALCs are specialized lymphoid structures constitutively distributed beneath the serosal lining of VAT – such as the greater omentum and mesentery – under physiological conditions (74, 75). Similar to SLOs, FALCs mediate local immune surveillance and early immune responses in the steady state. However, their architecture differs significantly from SLOs: FALCs lack a fibrous capsule, do not form GCs, and are devoid of distinct T/B cell zones, FDC networks, HEVs, conduits, and lymphatic vessels (76, 77, 78, 79). Yet, they possess a highly vascularized structure that supports rapid immune cell recruitment and infiltration (80). The core region of FALCs is enveloped by a monolayer of specialized CXCL13+ mesothelial cells, known as FALC cover cells (Fig. 1, FALC – physiological state) (81). This core is enriched with clusters of B1 cells and supported by a network scaffold formed by CCL19+ FRCs (82). It also contains T cells, innate lymphoid cells type 2 (ILC2s), M2 macrophages, eosinophils, and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells, collectively establishing a homeostatic immune niche dominated by type 2 immune responses (82, 83). FALC formation relies on a unique mechanism dependent on ILC2s and CXCL13 signaling from stromal cells (particularly FALC cover cells) and macrophages, contrasting with the LTi cells and LTβR signaling pathway essential for SLO development (15, 19, 84, 85, 86). Constitutive CXCL13 secretion by cover cells is crucial for maintaining B1 cell positioning and survival within the core (19). Concurrently, interleukin-33 (IL-33) release from cover cells activates neighboring ILC2s (87). Upon activation, ILC2s drive B1 cell proliferation and IgM secretion via interleukin-5 (IL-5) production and induce C-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CCL11) expression in adipose stromal cells through IL-4 and IL-13 secretion, thereby recruiting eosinophils (76, 87, 88). This cascade, orchestrated by FALC cover cells, CXCL13, and ILC2s, collectively contributes to metabolic balance and immune homeostasis within VAT.

Upon inflammatory or infectious stimulation, FALCs undergo rapid remodeling (Fig. 1, FALC – inflammation). Their number and volume increase dramatically, and they develop GCs, relatively distinct T/B cell zones, and HEVs, exhibiting features resembling TLSs but still lacking FDC networks (28). During this process, FRCs sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns through the Toll-like receptor adaptor protein myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) and secrete C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) to recruit inflammatory monocytes (80). FRCs and the recruited M1 macrophages promote T–B cell interactions via TNF–TNFR signaling, thereby driving GC reactions and antibody production (80). Concurrently, FALC cover cells secrete CCL2 to recruit M1 macrophages and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) to recruit neutrophils (81). These neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular trap-like aggregates within FALCs, characterized by an outer DNA structure expressing citrullinated histone H3, which efficiently capture luminal pathogens (81). The newly formed HEVs further accelerate the sustained infiltration of peripheral immune cells (77). TNF signals from infiltrating M1 macrophages, combined with IL-4 and IL-13 secreted by iNKT cells, collectively induce the generation of new FALCs (28). These changes drive the shift in the FALC microenvironment from a type 2 immunity-dominated steady state toward a type 1 inflammatory state, characterized by expansion of M1 macrophages, CD8+ T cells, T helper 1 (Th1) cells, neutrophils, and activated B cells, concomitant with a relative decline in resident type 2 immune cells (89).

CXCL13, constitutively expressed by FALC cover cells and macrophages throughout both physiological homeostasis and inflammatory responses, serves as a central hub for maintaining FALC structural integrity and lymphocyte recruitment. Under steady-state conditions, CXCL13 derived from FALC cover cells orchestrates type 2 immune cells, such as ILC2s and B1 cells, to collectively maintain metabolic balance and immune homeostasis. Conversely, during inflammation, CXCL13 secretion drives the production of divergent cytokines that promote immune cell infiltration and type 1 immune responses, consequently leading to immune–metabolic imbalance. This bidirectional core function in physiological surveillance and inflammatory remodeling underscores the unique role of CXCL13 within FALCs. Given the critical involvement of FALCs in obesity-associated inflammation, peritoneal infections, and autoimmune diseases, targeting the CXCL13–CXCR5 axis may present a novel therapeutic strategy for disorders at the metabolic–immune interface.

CXCL13-driven organ-specific inflammatory cascades: the heterogeneous network underlying obesity-associated multi-organ pathology

Under obesity-associated metabolic dysregulation, the microenvironment of lymphoid tissues – previously in a homeostatic or controlled state – undergoes profound alterations. This results in a shift in the role of CXCL13 from maintaining immune homeostasis to driving a sustained inflammatory cascade, thereby contributing to the formation of heterogeneous pathological networks in organs affected by chronic inflammation. The persistent accumulation of obesity-induced chronic low-grade inflammation across multiple organs serves as the central driver of metabolic syndrome and its complications, including insulin resistance, T2DM, AS, NAFLD, and its malignant transformation. As a critical nexus linking metabolic dysregulation and immune imbalance, CXCL13 plays a pivotal role in this systemic pathological process. Therefore, it is essential to elucidate its precise regulatory networks within specific organ microenvironments and disease stages (Fig. 2). This undertaking is crucial for deciphering the heterogeneous mechanisms underlying obesity-related multisystem complications and for developing targeted therapies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Biphasic spatiotemporal regulation of the CXCL13 hub in obesity-related immunometabolism: orchestrating the activation and migration of immune cells (T/B lymphocytes and macrophages), inducing the formation of TLSs and remodeling of fat-associated lymphoid clusters, and triggering inflammation–fibrosis cascades in different organs. This dynamic network facilitates a functional shift from early metabolic protection to late-stage organ damage. A full color version of this figure is available at https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-25-0295.

Adipose tissue

Adipose tissue, acting as a central hub in obesity-associated metabolic inflammation, undergoes a distinctive transformation in its FALC structure, revealing a CXCL13-driven immunometabolic cascade that progresses from maintaining physiological homeostasis to forming a pathological conversion characterized by features of TLSs, a process directly leading to systemic metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance (Fig. 2, adipose tissue). Under physiological conditions, FALCs in VAT establish a unique immune microenvironment that maintains immune homeostasis and metabolic balance through a CXCL13-dependent dual immunoregulatory axis. First, CXCL13+ mesothelial cells constitutively express high levels of CXCL13, continuously recruiting anti-inflammatory B1 cells to colonize FALCs (19). These B1 cells secrete interleukin-10 (IL-10), which inhibits pro-inflammatory Ly-6Chi monocyte retention while promoting anti-inflammatory Ly-6Clow monocyte accumulation (90). Concurrently, in concert with M2 macrophages, they reverse TNF-α-mediated inhibition of insulin signaling pathways and stimulate adiponectin secretion, thereby maintaining local insulin sensitivity (91, 92). Second, IL-33 derived from CXCL13+ mesothelial cells activates ILC2s, which in turn secrete IL-5 to promote the proliferation and differentiation of B1 cells into IgM plasma cells (88). Furthermore, retinoic acid stimulates cavity-resident macrophages to produce TGF-β2, promoting IgA class switching in B1 cells to establish an immune barrier against commensal bacteria (82). At this stage, the FALC microenvironment – dominated by type 2 immunity components including ILC2s, M2 macrophages, and B1 cells – forms the immunological cornerstone of metabolic equilibrium (93).

Obesity-induced adipose tissue remodeling, characterized by extracellular matrix stiffening and adipocyte hypertrophy, directly stimulates CXCL13 secretion from adipocytes (94, 95, 96). Although highly expressed in mature adipose tissue, CXCL13 does not directly participate in adipogenesis but instead drives pathological progression through immune regulation (97, 98). This adipocyte-derived CXCL13 activates M1 macrophages via paracrine signaling and, in concert with iNKT cells, induces abnormal expansion in both the number and size of FALCs through TNF, IL-4, and IL-13 signaling pathways (19, 82, 99, 100). During early high-fat diet-induced obesity, subcutaneous adipose tissue promotes innate lymphoid cells type 1 (ILC1s) proliferation and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) secretion via interleukin-12 (IL-12) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) signaling, directly activating M1 macrophages (101). These activated M1 macrophages enhance angiogenesis through secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (including MMP-7, MMP-9, and MMP-12) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), while simultaneously exacerbating fibrosis via release of TGF-β, reactive oxygen species, and reactive nitrogen species (94, 102, 103). By disrupting the protective IL-10 network, they establish a pro-inflammatory microenvironment centered on TNF-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), ultimately inducing systemic insulin resistance (74). Concurrently, CXCL13 drives pro-inflammatory phenotypic transformation in endothelial cells, upregulating adhesion molecules to increase vascular permeability and facilitate immune cell infiltration (99, 100). Sustained inflammatory stimulation drives the transformation of FALCs into structures resembling TLSs. Within FALCs, CXCL13 recruits B2 cells into GCs (104). Acting in concert with the CCL19–MYD88 signaling pathway in FRCs, this recruitment facilitates CD4+ T cell co-localization, thereby promoting T–B cell interactions and IgG class switching (79). This cascade culminates in increased secretion of autoreactive IgG antibodies, exacerbating inflammation in VAT and contributing to insulin resistance. Activated fibroblasts further support B cell activation by constructing a three-dimensional stromal network through collagen and fibrin secretion, simultaneously amplifying inflammatory signals and accelerating the pathological process (103). Concurrently, chronic inflammation persistently depletes B1 cells, further impairing their critical anti-inflammatory and barrier functions (92).

Ultimately, a self-perpetuating cycle is established: adipose tissue remodeling stimulates CXCL13 secretion, which perpetuates chronic inflammation and drives the rapid remodeling of FALCs, thereby accelerating the pathological progression of insulin resistance and systemic metabolic disorders. This process reveals a CXCL13 gradient imbalance across tissues: serum CXCL13 levels are significantly reduced in obese patients, positively correlating with high-density lipoprotein and negatively correlating with cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (105). This reduction reflects impaired systemic immune chemotactic function. Conversely, locally elevated CXCL13 levels in mouse peritoneal ascites highlight the predominance of tissue-specific macrophage recruitment (106). Collectively, this disrupted CXCL13 gradient constitutes a core mechanism of immunometabolic homeostasis dysregulation, whereby systemic concentration imbalance exacerbates lipid metabolism disorders, while local pathological elevation drives a vicious cycle of inflammation – conclusively demonstrating the mechanism underlying immunometabolic equilibrium disruption.

Pancreatic islets

As a key target organ in obesity-associated chronic inflammation, pancreatic islets experience β-cell dysfunction that acts as the core driver of diabetes development and progression. Obesity-induced metabolic dysregulation and systemic inflammation create the foundation for aberrant CXCL13 expression, establishing it as a critical molecular nexus linking obesity-related inflammation, pancreatic islet damage, and diabetic complications. Within the pancreatic islet microenvironment, CXCL13 functions as a central factor driving inflammatory cell accumulation and β-cell destruction (Fig. 2, pancreatic islet) (107). Furthermore, CXCL13 serves as a key inducer of TLS formation within pancreatic islets, particularly in autoimmune-mediated pancreatic islet damage (107). Clinical evidence demonstrates a positive correlation between CXCL13 levels, added sugar intake, and the incidence of T2DM (108). The expression of CXCL13 is regulated by high-glucose-activated pathways, such as Janus kinase and STAT, thereby amplifying systemic low-grade inflammation (109, 110). Obesity- or autoimmunity-mediated inflammatory infiltration (predominantly involving CD8+ T cells and macrophages) induces local upregulation of LT-α/β, subsequently triggering CXCL13 and CCL19 expression (111, 112). This chemokine-mediated recruitment of B and T cells drives the progressive formation of mature TLSs featuring organized structures, including GCs, FDCs, and HEVs (113, 114, 115, 116). Within mature TLSs, immune cells – primarily B cells, plasma cells, and antigen-presenting cells – cooperatively destroy β-cells through multiple mechanisms. CXCR5+ B cells in GCs utilize activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) to mediate antibody affinity maturation and class switch recombination, thereby driving autoreactive B cell proliferation (117). CD138+ plasma cells directly attack β-cells via local secretion of anti-insulin autoantibodies (118). CD45 MHC-II+ non-hematopoietic cells activate infiltrating CD4+ T cells through pancreatic islet antigen presentation, inducing secretion of pro-inflammatory factors, such as IFN-γ, that promote β-cell apoptosis (115). Crucially, TLS maintenance relies on persistent antigenic stimulation from residual β-cells. Extensive β-cell depletion reduces inflammatory signals (including CXCL13), consequently diminishing the incidence of functionally mature TLSs and immune cell infiltration (114, 118, 119). This dynamic clearly demonstrates the direct association between CXCL13-driven immune restructuring and pancreatic islet destruction progression. Such cumulative pancreatic islet damage and inflammatory processes ultimately contribute to diabetes development and progression.

Furthermore, with diabetes progression, CXCL13 – functioning as a pivotal mediator at the intersection of obesity-related metabolic disorders (hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia) and chronic inflammation – demonstrates strongly compartmentalized expression and functionality across diabetic complications. The heterogeneous tissue-specific expression patterns of CXCL13 underscore its critical dependence on local microenvironments. Upregulation occurs predominantly in inflammation-driven complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), and tendinopathy. In DR, Tfh cells secrete CXCL13 to promote B-cell proliferation and activation, exacerbating vascular leakage and neovascularization; CXCL13 levels show significant positive correlations with fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin type A1c (HbA1c), and BMI (120). In DFU, CXCL13 overexpression activates IL-17 and TNF signaling pathways, driving excessive immune cell infiltration that potentiates inflammation (121). In PDN, neuronal CXCL13 activates astrocytes through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), STAT3, and protein kinase B (AKT) signaling cascades, inducing release of TNF-α, IL-6, and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), which collectively mediate central sensitization and neuropathic pain (122). In tendinopathy, glucolipotoxicity induces senescence in tendon-derived stem cells (TSCs) while aberrantly activating CXCL13, thereby promoting TSCs’ osteogenic differentiation that ultimately impairs tendon repair and causes ectopic ossification (123). In complications characterized by impaired repair mechanisms – diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and diabetic bone defects – CXCL13 expression is downregulated. In DPN, diminished CXCL13 disrupts immune cell infiltration balance (notably neutrophils, macrophages, B cells, and NK cells), exacerbating neural damage through dysregulated inflammation (124). Similarly, hyperglycemia in diabetic bone defects suppresses CXCL13, concurrently inhibiting bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs) proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and reducing alkaline phosphatase activity (125, 126). These alterations collectively impair osteogenic capacity – a pathological process reversible upon CXCL13 restoration. This context-dependent duality originates from tissue-specific microenvironmental interpretations of CXCL13 signaling under metabolic stress, ultimately polarizing outcomes toward either pro-inflammation or repair suppression. Critically, CXCL13 serves dual pathogenic roles: as a primary driver of pancreatic islet inflammation and TLS formation that directly facilitates β-cell destruction and as a metabolic–inflammatory nexus propagating multi-organ crosstalk. Its organotypic expression patterns thus bidirectionally modulate the trajectories of diabetic complications.

Blood vessels

The blood vessels, as a principal target in obesity-associated chronic inflammation, undergoes AS progression characterized by chronic inflammatory responses to dysregulated lipoprotein metabolism. This process entails aberrant activation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), fibroblasts, and immune cells (such as B cells, T cells, and M1 macrophages) (127, 128). Within the obesogenic environment characterized by hyperlipidemia and chronic low-grade inflammation, CXCL13 mediates stage-dependent regulatory functions throughout AS pathogenesis (Fig. 2, blood vessels). During early plaque stabilization phases, VSMCs and M1 macrophages co-express CXCL13, forming focal enrichments that confer cytoprotective effects. These include suppression of VSMC apoptosis; promotion of anti-inflammatory factor secretion (TGF-β and IL-10) and oxidative stress-mitigating arginase-1; and concurrent inhibition of MMPs expression to preserve fibrous cap integrity (129, 130, 131, 132). Furthermore, locally enriched FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) attenuate inflammatory cascades while inducing naïve CD4+ T-cell differentiation into Tregs (60). These mechanisms synergize with B1 cell-derived oxidation-specific IgM antibodies targeting oxidized LDL, collectively establishing an immune-tolerant vascular niche (129, 132).

Under persistent obesity-associated metabolic inflammatory stimulation and disease progression, CXCL13 undergoes functional transformation that drives plaque destabilization. The CXCL13–CXCR5 axis mediates B-cell migration to the adventitia, facilitating TLS formation. Recruited T/B lymphocytes secrete LTα1β2, which amplifies CXCL13 release from VSMCs and M1 macrophages via positive feedback, promoting FDC network maturation to support GC formation (60, 133, 134). Concurrently, CCL21-recruited T cells drive B-cell plasmacytic differentiation through MHC-II antigen presentation and Tfh-derived CD40L signaling, facilitating affinity-matured production of pro-inflammatory immunoglobulins (e.g., IgG targeting oxidized LDL or heat shock protein 60), thereby exacerbating vascular inflammation (60, 135). Concomitant HEV formation and aberrant lymphoid conduit neogenesis enable direct T/B lymphocytes infiltration, intensifying chemokine/antigen/cytokine crosstalk between vascular layers (135). This shifts TLS immunity toward pro-inflammatory skewing, substantially elevating plaque instability risks. Clinical and experimental evidence supports the stage-specific importance of CXCL13 in the pathogenesis of obesity-related AS. High-fat diets elevate circulating CXCL13 levels in ApoE−/− mice, promoting inflammatory infiltration (136). Mirroring this, human aortic plaques exhibit transient CXCL13 surges specifically during vulnerability phases (137). Clinically, symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis patients show significantly elevated serum CXCL13 following stroke or transient ischemic attack (130). Furthermore, in aged ApoE−/− mice, adventitial TLS size positively correlates with intimal lesion severity (138). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that CXCL13 orchestrates a pathological transition from early immunotolerance to late-stage inflammatory dysregulation, characterized by TLS formation in AS.

Liver

The liver, a critical target in obesity-associated chronic inflammation, undergoes NAFLD progression driven by persistent metabolic stress and inflammatory signaling. This disease spectrum evolves from simple steatosis through nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CXCL13 critically drives pathogenesis by mediating immune cell infiltration, disrupting lipid metabolism, and amplifying inflammation (Fig. 2, liver). Its regulatory functions dynamically transition during NAFLD advancement. In the simple steatosis phase, suppressed CXCL13 expression cooperates with attenuated STAT4 signaling and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) induction to establish a protective network. This coordinated mechanism inhibits inflammatory cascades while preserving lipid homeostasis, constituting the body’s compensatory defense against lipotoxicity (139).

However, when the disease progresses to NASH, intestinal barrier dysfunction results in the leakage of bacterial components via the portal vein, which abnormally upregulates intrahepatic CXCL13 through Toll-like receptor 2/4 (TLR2/4) signaling, thereby chemotactically recruiting B cells to infiltrate the liver parenchyma (140, 141). These infiltrating B cells express high levels of pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), and enhance their antigen-presenting capacity by upregulating CD80 and MHC-II, thus activating T-cell immune responses (139, 141). This process, in synergy with TLR4 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, disrupts the original metabolic compensation, exacerbating chronic inflammation, lipid metabolic disorders, and fibrosis (139, 141). In the cirrhosis stage, persistent liver injury activates macrophages through the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, inducing CXCL13 expression. This suppresses AKT/FoxO3a signaling in Ly-6Clow restorative macrophages and downregulates hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression, thereby impairing HGF/c-MET pathway-mediated liver regeneration (142). Concurrently, CXCL13+ exhausted CD8+ T cells form an immunometabolic imbalance network through the activation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint, glycolytic and pyruvate metabolic reprogramming, and dysregulated T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling, thereby cooperatively accelerating cirrhosis progression (143). This dual role of CXCL13 as a ‘switch’ – inhibitory in early stages and activating in late stages – signifies the failure of lipotoxicity defense, constituting the molecular switch that drives the progression from NAFLD to NASH (144).

When the disease progresses to the HCC stage, CXCL13 synergistically drives malignant transformation through three coordinated mechanisms: activating oncogenic pathways, remodeling the tumor microenvironment, and inducing metabolic imbalance. At the molecular pathway level, CXCL13 forms a positive feedback loop with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway – wherein Wnt activators upregulate CXCL13/CXCR5, while CXCL13 inhibitors suppress β-catenin signaling – thereby continuously amplifying oncogenic signals (145). Within the immune microenvironment, CXCL13 recruits CXCR5+ CD8+ T cells, T helper 17 (Th17) cells, macrophages, and B cells to facilitate immune escape (146, 147, 148, 149). This recruitment promotes IL-12/IL-17 secretion by Th17 cells, exacerbating inflammation-associated carcinogenesis, and induces the production of immunosuppressive IgG4 in B cells (145, 146). Metabolically, CXCL13 suppresses adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation while activating the protein kinase C (PKC) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, upregulating lipogenic genes (including fatty acid synthase and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1) that cause abnormal lipid droplet accumulation, thereby establishing a cancer-promoting metabolic imbalance (150). Clinical evidence further confirms the prognostic significance of CXCL13: levels are markedly elevated in both serum and tumor tissues of advanced HCC patients (145, 151). Serum concentrations positively correlate with liver injury markers, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), highlighting its potential as a circulating biomarker for HCC progression (145, 151).

Targeting CXCL13: challenges and prospects for organ- and stage-specific precision interventions

CXCL13 plays a central role in obesity-related metabolic inflammation and cumulative multi-organ damage, making it an exceptionally promising therapeutic target. Current therapeutic strategies targeting CXCL13 primarily involve direct blockade and can be categorized at two levels. At the genetic level, knockout or inhibition of the CXCL13 gene in mice or rats attenuates the inflammatory response (23). In carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury models, CXCL13 knockout mice exhibited significantly enhanced liver regeneration, as evidenced by reduced serum ALT and AST levels, diminished necrotic areas, and upregulated hepatocyte proliferation markers (such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen and cyclin D1) (142). In tendon abnormality models, targeted inhibition in diabetic mice using small interfering RNA delivered via adeno-associated virus 2 effectively alleviated ectopic ossification process under metabolic disorder conditions (123). In specific in vitro cell knockout or inhibition models, targeted knockout of CXCL13 effectively reversed the abnormal osteogenic differentiation of TSCs induced by high glucose and high fat and significantly inhibited the osteogenic differentiation capacity of BMSCs (123, 125). At the protein level, in the liver injury model, blocking CXCL13 with an anti-CXCL13 antibody relieved the suppression of HGF expression by macrophages, activated the HGF/c-MET pathway, promoted hepatocyte proliferation, and thereby accelerated liver regeneration (142). Crucially, however, this ‘beneficial’ effect is not universal: in murine pancreatic islet autoimmune models, anti-CXCL13 antibodies disrupted TLSs within islets but failed to delay diabetes progression (117). This may be because targeting only the CXCL13-driven immune structures may not be sufficient to reverse the CXCL13-mediated functional damage or to adapt to the complex pathological microenvironment, thereby reducing the therapeutic efficacy.

The research above demonstrates that although CXCL13 holds significant potential as a therapeutic target for obesity-related metabolic inflammation, its clinical application still faces fundamental limitations. The function of this chemokine is highly context-dependent and can play completely opposite roles in different target organs and stages of disease development. Moreover, current intervention strategies are mainly limited to specific organs or disease models, posing substantial challenges for clinical application. Within the obesity-associated inflammatory cascade, CXCL13 can exert protective regulation, as seen in early-stage fatty liver or plaque stabilization, while simultaneously acting as a critical switch that drives destructive processes, such as the transition to NASH, plaque destabilization, and the progression of HCC. This double-edged nature demands intervention strategies with high precision (organ-targeted), strict timeliness (disease-stage specificity), and microenvironment adaptability.

Based on the discussion above, future research must urgently focus on two key areas: developing drug delivery technologies capable of crossing biological barriers (such as vascular walls and specific tissues) for precise organ and cell targeting, and exploring combinatorial interventions (such as co-targeting CXCL13 and its synergistic signaling pathways) to counteract complex regulatory networks. Consequently, while the role of CXCL13 as a molecular nexus is undeniable, translating this knowledge into safe and effective clinical therapeutics requires a more in-depth investigation of its finely tuned regulatory mechanisms across the full spectrum of obesity-related inflammatory accumulation and within specific target organ microenvironments.

Conclusion

This review elucidates the central orchestrating role of CXCL13 in obesity-related metabolic inflammation. Through spatiotemporal heterogeneity, CXCL13 drives pathological progression across multiple organs. This progression manifests spatially as organ-specific lymphoid remodeling, which includes the pathological transformation of adipose tissue FALCs, TLS-induced β-cell destruction in pancreatic islets, dynamic regulation of vascular plaque stability, and malignant transformation from NAFLD to HCC in the liver. Temporally, CXCL13 exhibits stage-dependent functional switching, evolving from early protective maintenance of metabolic homeostasis to late-stage promotion of organ damage. Precisely regulated by local metabolic–immune microenvironments, this dual nature underscores the core challenge of overcoming spatiotemporal heterogeneity for targeted interventions. It necessitates the precise modulation of specific functions in the appropriate organs at optimal time points. Consequently, this review establishes a theoretical framework for developing stratified, staged, and organ-targeted therapies, thereby advancing precision medicine for the multisystem complications of obesity.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023YFS0186 and 2023YFS0222).

Author contribution statement

MH wrote the manuscript. XC, YJ, and TL gave valuable suggestions and made critical revisions. YJ and TL conceptualized and supervised the preparation of this manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The figures were compiled using images from Servier Medical Art.

References

  • 1.Miller MC & Mayo KH. Chemokines from a structural perspective. Int J Mol Sci 2017. 18 2088. ( 10.3390/ijms18102088) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Trivedi PJ & Adams DH. Chemokines and chemokine receptors as therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease; pitfalls and promise. J Crohns Colitis 2018. 12 S641–S652. ( 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx145) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rot A & von Andrian UH. Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2004. 22 891–928. ( 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104543) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gunn MD, Ngo VN, Ansel KM, et al. A B-cell-homing chemokine made in lymphoid follicles activates Burkitt’s lymphoma receptor-1. Nature 1998. 391 799–803. ( 10.1038/35876) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Legler DF, Loetscher M, Roos RS, et al. B cell-attracting chemokine 1, a human CXC chemokine expressed in lymphoid tissues, selectively attracts B lymphocytes via BLR1/CXCR5. J Exp Med 1998. 187 655–660. ( 10.1084/jem.187.4.655) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saeki H, Wu MT, Olasz E, et al. A migratory population of skin-derived dendritic cells expresses CXCR5, responds to B lymphocyte chemoattractant in vitro, and co-localizes to B cell zones in lymph nodes in vivo. Eur J Immunol 2000. 30 2808–2814. ( 10.1002/1521-4141(200010)30:103.0.Co;2-k) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schaerli P, Willimann K, Lang AB, et al. CXC chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell helper function. J Exp Med 2000. 192 1553–1562. ( 10.1084/jem.192.11.1553) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harrer C, Otto F, Radlberger RF, et al. The CXCL13/CXCR5 immune axis in health and disease – implications for intrathecal B cell activities in neuroinflammation. Cells 2022. 11 2649. ( 10.3390/cells11172649) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cyster JG, Ansel KM, Reif K, et al. Follicular stromal cells and lymphocyte homing to follicles. Immunol Rev 2000. 176 181–193. ( 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.00618) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crotty S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH). Annu Rev Immunol 2011. 29 621–663. ( 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101400) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willard-Mack CL. Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes. Toxicol Pathol 2006. 34 409–424. ( 10.1080/01926230600867727) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carlsen HS, Baekkevold ES, Morton HC, et al. Monocyte-like and mature macrophages produce CXCL13 (B cell-attracting chemokine 1) in inflammatory lesions with lymphoid neogenesis. Blood 2004. 104 3021–3027. ( 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0701) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shinnakasu R & Kurosaki T. Regulation of memory B and plasma cell differentiation. Curr Opin Immunol 2017. 45 126–131. ( 10.1016/j.coi.2017.03.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ise W, Fujii K, Shiroguchi K, et al. T follicular helper cell-germinal center B cell interaction strength regulates entry into plasma cell or recycling germinal center cell fate. Immunity 2018. 48 702–715.e704. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.027) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ansel KM, Harris RBS & Cyster JG. CXCL13 is required for B1 cell homing, natural antibody production, and body cavity immunity. Immunity 2002. 16 67–76. ( 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00257-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Höpken UE, Achtman AH, Krüger K, et al. Distinct and overlapping roles of CXCR5 and CCR7 in B-1 cell homing and early immunity against bacterial pathogens. J Leukoc Biol 2004. 76 709–718. ( 10.1189/jlb.1203643) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang B, Wang M, Ao D, et al. CXCL13-CXCR5 axis: regulation in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022. 1877 188799. ( 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188799) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van de Pavert SA, Olivier BJ, Goverse G, et al. Chemokine CXCL13 is essential for lymph node initiation and is induced by retinoic acid and neuronal stimulation. Nat Immunol 2009. 10 1193–1199. ( 10.1038/ni.1789) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bénézech C, Luu N-T, Walker JA, et al. Inflammation-induced formation of fat-associated lymphoid clusters. Nat Immunol 2015. 16 819–828. ( 10.1038/ni.3215) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asam S, Nayar S, Gardner D, et al. Stromal cells in tertiary lymphoid structures: architects of autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 2021. 302 184–195. ( 10.1111/imr.12987) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gago da Graça C, van Baarsen LGM & Mebius RE. Tertiary lymphoid structures: diversity in their development, composition, and role. J Immunol 2021. 206 273–281. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.2000873) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pan Z, Zhu T, Liu Y, et al. Role of the CXCL13/CXCR5 axis in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 2022. 13 850998. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2022.850998) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hui L, Li Y, Huang M-K, et al. CXCL13: a common target for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Clin Exp Med 2024. 24 244. ( 10.1007/s10238-024-01508-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aloisi F & Pujol-Borrell R. Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2006. 6 205–217. ( 10.1038/nri1786) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin L, Hu X, Zhang H, et al. Tertiary lymphoid organs in cancer immunology: mechanisms and the new strategy for immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2019. 10 1398. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01398) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barone F, Gardner DH, Nayar S, et al. Stromal fibroblasts in tertiary lymphoid structures: a novel target in chronic inflammation. Front Immunol 2016. 7 477. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00477) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Winter S, Loddenkemper C, Aebischer A, et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR5 is pivotal for ectopic mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue neogenesis in chronic Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation. J Mol Med 2010. 88 1169–1180. ( 10.1007/s00109-010-0658-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cruz-Migoni S & Caamaño J. Fat-associated lymphoid clusters in inflammation and immunity. Front Immunol 2016. 7 612. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00612) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) . Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2024. 403 1027–1050. ( 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02750-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. WHO Technical Report Series 2000. 894 1–253. (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42330) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lumeng CN & Saltiel AR. Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Investig 2011. 121 2111–2117. ( 10.1172/jci57132) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu H & Ballantyne CM. Skeletal muscle inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. J Clin Investig 2017. 127 43–54. ( 10.1172/jci88880) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Charles-Messance H, Mitchelson KAJ, De Marco Castro E, et al. Regulating metabolic inflammation by nutritional modulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020. 146 706–720. ( 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koyama Y & Brenner DA. Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J Clin Investig 2017. 127 55–64. ( 10.1172/jci88881) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yong J, Johnson JD, Arvan P, et al. Therapeutic opportunities for pancreatic β-cell ER stress in diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021. 17 455–467. ( 10.1038/s41574-021-00510-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schleh MW, Caslin HL, Garcia JN, et al. Metaflammation in obesity and its therapeutic targeting. Sci Transl Med 2023. 15 eadf9382. ( 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf9382) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Luo S, Zhu R, Yu T, et al. Chronic inflammation: a common promoter in tertiary lymphoid organ neogenesis. Front Immunol 2019. 10 2938. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02938) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chang JE & Turley SJ. Stromal infrastructure of the lymph node and coordination of immunity. Trends Immunol 2015. 36 30–39. ( 10.1016/j.it.2014.11.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van de Pavert SA & Mebius RE. New insights into the development of lymphoid tissues. Nat Rev Immunol 2010. 10 664–674. ( 10.1038/nri2832) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Blanchard L & Girard J-P. High endothelial venules (HEVs) in immunity, inflammation and cancer. Angiogenesis 2021. 24 719–753. ( 10.1007/s10456-021-09792-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hemmerich S, Bistrup A, Singer MS, et al. Sulfation of L-selectin ligands by an HEV-restricted sulfotransferase regulates lymphocyte homing to lymph nodes. Immunity 2001. 15 237–247. ( 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00188-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kawashima H, Petryniak B, Hiraoka N, et al. N-acetylglucosamine-6-O-sulfotransferases 1 and 2 cooperatively control lymphocyte homing through L-selectin ligand biosynthesis in high endothelial venules. Nat Immunol 2005. 6 1096–1104. ( 10.1038/ni1259) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shamri R, Grabovsky V, Gauguet JM, et al. Lymphocyte arrest requires instantaneous induction of an extended LFA-1 conformation mediated by endothelium-bound chemokines. Nat Immunol 2005. 6 497–506. ( 10.1038/ni1194) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mueller SN & Germain RN. Stromal cell contributions to the homeostasis and functionality of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2009. 9 618–629. ( 10.1038/nri2588) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bajénoff M, Egen JG, Koo LY, et al. Stromal cell networks regulate lymphocyte entry, migration, and territoriality in lymph nodes. Immunity 2006. 25 989–1001. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Girard J-P, Moussion C & Förster R. HEVs, lymphatics and homeostatic immune cell trafficking in lymph nodes. Nat Rev Immunol 2012. 12 762–773. ( 10.1038/nri3298) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Anderson AO & Shaw S. Conduit for privileged communications in the lymph node. Immunity 2005. 22 3–5. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Friedman RS, Jacobelli J & Krummel MF. Surface-bound chemokines capture and prime T cells for synapse formation. Nat Immunol 2006. 7 1101–1108. ( 10.1038/ni1384) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Allen CD, Okada T, Tang HL, et al. Imaging of germinal center selection events during affinity maturation. Science 2007. 315 528–531. ( 10.1126/science.1136736) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schwickert TA, Lindquist RL, Shakhar G, et al. In vivo imaging of germinal centres reveals a dynamic open structure. Nature 2007. 446 83–87. ( 10.1038/nature05573) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Förster R, Braun A & Worbs T. Lymph node homing of T cells and dendritic cells via afferent lymphatics. Trends Immunol 2012. 33 271–280. ( 10.1016/j.it.2012.02.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shiow LR, Rosen DB, Brdicková N, et al. CD69 acts downstream of interferon-alpha/beta to inhibit S1P1 and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nature 2006. 440 540–544. ( 10.1038/nature04606) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.von Andrian UH & Mempel TR. Homing and cellular traffic in lymph nodes. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2003. 3 867–878. ( 10.1038/nri1222) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schumacher TN & Thommen DS. Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Science 2022. 375 eabf9419. ( 10.1126/science.abf9419) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sato Y, Silina K, van den Broek M, et al. The roles of tertiary lymphoid structures in chronic diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 2023. 19 525–537. ( 10.1038/s41581-023-00706-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhao L, Jin S, Wang S, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures in diseases: immune mechanisms and therapeutic advances. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther 2024. 9 225. ( 10.1038/s41392-024-01947-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ruddle NH. Lymphatic vessels and tertiary lymphoid organs. J Clin Investig 2014. 124 953–959. ( 10.1172/jci71611) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rangel-Moreno J, Carragher DM, de la Luz Garcia-Hernandez M, et al. The development of inducible bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue depends on IL-17. Nat Immunol 2011. 12 639–646. ( 10.1038/ni.2053) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nayar S, Campos J, Smith CG, et al. Immunofibroblasts are pivotal drivers of tertiary lymphoid structure formation and local pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019. 116 13490–13497. ( 10.1073/pnas.1905301116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yin C, Mohanta SK, Srikakulapu P, et al. Artery tertiary lymphoid organs: powerhouses of atherosclerosis immunity. Front Immunol 2016. 7 387. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00387) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ciccia F, Rizzo A, Maugeri R, et al. Ectopic expression of CXCL13, BAFF, APRIL and LT-β is associated with artery tertiary lymphoid organs in giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017. 76 235–243. ( 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209217) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aguzzi A, Kranich J & Krautler NJ. Follicular dendritic cells: origin, phenotype, and function in health and disease. Trends Immunol 2014. 35 105–113. ( 10.1016/j.it.2013.11.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rouanne M, Arpaia N & Marabelle A. CXCL13 shapes tertiary lymphoid structures and promotes response to immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021. 151 245–248. ( 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.054) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.GeurtsvanKessel CH, Willart MA, Bergen IM, et al. Dendritic cells are crucial for maintenance of tertiary lymphoid structures in the lung of influenza virus-infected mice. J Exp Med 2009. 206 2339–2349. ( 10.1084/jem.20090410) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Thommen DS, Koelzer VH, Herzig P, et al. A transcriptionally and functionally distinct PD-1(+) CD8(+) T cell pool with predictive potential in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade. Nat Med 2018. 24 994–1004. ( 10.1038/s41591-018-0057-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Koscsó B, Kurapati S, Rodrigues RR, et al. Gut-resident CX3CR1(hi) macrophages induce tertiary lymphoid structures and IgA response in situ. Sci Immunol 2020. 5 eaax0062. ( 10.1126/sciimmunol.aax0062) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ukita M, Hamanishi J, Yoshitomi H, et al. CXCL13-producing CD4+ T cells accumulate in the early phase of tertiary lymphoid structures in ovarian cancer. JCI Insight 2022. 7 e157215. ( 10.1172/jci.insight.157215) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rao DA, Gurish MF, Marshall JL, et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 2017. 542 110–114. ( 10.1038/nature20810) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sato Y, Oguchi A, Fukushima Y, et al. CD153/CD30 signaling promotes age-dependent tertiary lymphoid tissue expansion and kidney injury. J Clin Investig 2022. 132 e146071. ( 10.1172/jci146071) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fleig S, Kapanadze T, Bernier-Latmani J, et al. Loss of vascular endothelial notch signaling promotes spontaneous formation of tertiary lymphoid structures. Nat Commun 2022. 13 2022. ( 10.1038/s41467-022-29701-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Link A, Hardie DL, Favre S, et al. Association of T-zone reticular networks and conduits with ectopic lymphoid tissues in mice and humans. Am J Pathol 2011. 178 1662–1675. ( 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.039) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hughes CE, Benson RA, Bedaj M, et al. Antigen-presenting cells and antigen presentation in tertiary lymphoid organs. Front Immunol 2016. 7 481. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00481) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Buckley CD, Barone F, Nayar S, et al. Stromal cells in chronic inflammation and tertiary lymphoid organ formation. Annu Rev Immunol 2015. 33 715–745. ( 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120252) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liu M, Silva-Sanchez A, Randall TD, et al. Specialized immune responses in the peritoneal cavity and omentum. J Leukoc Biol 2021. 109 717–729. ( 10.1002/jlb.5mir0720-271rr) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Daley AD & Bénézech C. Fat‐associated lymphoid clusters: supporting visceral adipose tissue B cell function in immunity and metabolism. Immunol Rev 2024. 324 78–94. ( 10.1111/imr.13339) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Moro K, Yamada T, Tanabe M, et al. Innate production of TH2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit+Sca-1+ lymphoid cells. Nature 2009. 463 540–544. ( 10.1038/nature08636) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Buscher K, Wang H, Zhang X, et al. Protection from septic peritonitis by rapid neutrophil recruitment through omental high endothelial venules. Nat Commun 2016. 7 10828. ( 10.1038/ncomms10828) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Meza-Perez S & Randall TD. Immunological functions of the omentum. Trends Immunol 2017. 38 526–536. ( 10.1016/j.it.2017.03.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Perez-Shibayama C, Gil-Cruz C, Cheng H-W, et al. Fibroblastic reticular cells initiate immune responses in visceral adipose tissues and secure peritoneal immunity. Sci Immunol 2018. 3 eaar4539. ( 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar4539) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jackson-Jones LH & Bénézech C. FALC stromal cells define a unique immunological niche for the surveillance of serous cavities. Curr Opin Immunol 2020. 64 42–49. ( 10.1016/j.coi.2020.03.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jackson-Jones LH, Smith P, Portman JR, et al. Stromal cells covering omental fat-associated lymphoid clusters trigger formation of neutrophil aggregates to capture peritoneal contaminants. Immunity 2020. 52 700–715.e706. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Trim WV & Lynch L. Immune and non-immune functions of adipose tissue leukocytes. Nat Rev Immunol 2021. 22 371–386. ( 10.1038/s41577-021-00635-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Brestoff Jonathan R & Artis D. Immune regulation of metabolic homeostasis in health and disease. Cell 2015. 161 146–160. ( 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Randall TD, Carragher DM & Rangel-Moreno J. Development of secondary lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol 2008. 26 627–650. ( 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090257) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rangel-Moreno J, Moyron-Quiroz JE, Carragher DM, et al. Omental milky spots develop in the absence of lymphoid tissue-inducer cells and support B and T cell responses to peritoneal antigens. Immunity 2009. 30 731–743. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roozendaal R & Mebius RE. Stromal cell–immune cell interactions. Annu Rev Immunol 2011. 29 23–43. ( 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101357) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Rana BMJ, Jou E, Barlow JL, et al. A stromal cell niche sustains ILC2-mediated type-2 conditioning in adipose tissue. J Exp Med 2019. 216 1999–2009. ( 10.1084/jem.20190689) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jackson-Jones LH, Duncan SM, Magalhaes MS, et al. Fat-associated lymphoid clusters control local IgM secretion during pleural infection and lung inflammation. Nat Commun 2016. 7 12651. ( 10.1038/ncomms12651) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Trim W, Turner JE & Thompson D. Parallels in immunometabolic adipose tissue dysfunction with ageing and obesity. Front Immunol 2018. 9 169. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00169) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wu L, Dalal R, Cao CD, et al. IL-10–producing B cells are enriched in murine pericardial adipose tissues and ameliorate the outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019. 116 21673–21684. ( 10.1073/pnas.1911464116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lumeng CN, Bodzin JL & Saltiel AR. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J Clin Investig 2007. 117 175–184. ( 10.1172/jci29881) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wu L, Parekh VV, Hsiao J, et al. Spleen supports a pool of innate-like B cells in white adipose tissue that protects against obesity-associated insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014. 111 E4638–E4647. ( 10.1073/pnas.1324052111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Molofsky AB, Nussbaum JC, Liang H-E, et al. Innate lymphoid type 2 cells sustain visceral adipose tissue eosinophils and alternatively activated macrophages. J Exp Med 2013. 210 535–549. ( 10.1084/jem.20121964) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Crewe C, An YA & Scherer PE. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired angiogenesis. J Clin Investig 2017. 127 74–82. ( 10.1172/jci88883) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Frasca D & Blomberg Bonnie B. Adipose tissue: a tertiary lymphoid organ: does it change with age? Gerontology 2020. 66 114–121. ( 10.1159/000502036) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kim M, Lee C & Park J. Extracellular matrix remodeling facilitates obesity-associated cancer progression. Trends Cell Biol 2022. 32 825–834. ( 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.02.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kabir SM, Lee E-S & Son D-S. Chemokine network during adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Adipocyte 2014. 3 97–106. ( 10.4161/adip.28110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kusuyama J, Komorizono A, Bandow K, et al. CXCL3 positively regulates adipogenic differentiation. J Lipid Res 2016. 57 1806–1820. ( 10.1194/jlr.M067207) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fiedler U, Reiss Y, Scharpfenecker M, et al. Angiopoietin-2 sensitizes endothelial cells to TNF-α and has a crucial role in the induction of inflammation. Nat Med 2006. 12 235–239. ( 10.1038/nm1351) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Choisez A, Ishihara S, Ishii T, et al. Matrix stiffness regulates the triad communication of adipocytes/macrophages/endothelial cells through CXCL13. J Lipid Res 2024. 65 100620. ( 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100620) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.O’Sullivan TE, Rapp M, Fan X, et al. Adipose-resident group 1 innate lymphoid cells promote obesity-associated insulin resistance. Immunity 2016. 45 428–441. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cho C-H, Jun Koh Y, Han J, et al. Angiogenic role of LYVE-1–positive macrophages in adipose tissue. Circ Res 2007. 100 e47–e57. ( 10.1161/01.Res.0000259564.92792.93) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wynn TA & Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med 2012. 18 1028–1040. ( 10.1038/nm.2807) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Frasca D & Blomberg BB. Adipose tissue inflammation induces B cell inflammation and decreases B cell function in aging. Front Immunol 2017. 8 1003. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.McKay HS, Bream JH, Margolick JB, et al. Host factors associated with serologic inflammatory markers assessed using multiplex assays. Cytokine 2016. 85 71–79. ( 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.05.016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ignacio RMC, Lee E-S, Wilson AJ, et al. Obesity-induced peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer and dominant recruitment of macrophages in ascites. Immune Netw 2018. 18 e47. ( 10.4110/in.2018.18.e47) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gonzalez Badillo FE, Zisi Tegou F, Abreu MM, et al. CCL21 expression in β-cells induces antigen-expressing stromal cell networks in the pancreas and prevents autoimmune diabetes in mice. Diabetes 2019. 68 1990–2003. ( 10.2337/db19-0239) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ramne S, Drake I, Ericson U, et al. Identification of inflammatory and disease-associated plasma proteins that associate with intake of added sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages and their role in type 2 diabetes risk. Nutrients 2020. 12 3129. ( 10.3390/nu12103129) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Griffith JW, Sokol CL & Luster AD. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2014. 32 659–702. ( 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wu C, Chen X, Shu J, et al. Whole-genome expression analyses of type 2 diabetes in human skin reveal altered immune function and burden of infection. Oncotarget 2017. 8 34601–34609. ( 10.18632/oncotarget.16118) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lee Y, Chin RK, Christiansen P, et al. Recruitment and activation of naive T cells in the islets by lymphotoxin β receptor-dependent tertiary lymphoid structure. Immunity 2006. 25 499–509. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Liu S-W, Sun F, Rong S-J, et al. Lymphotoxins serve as a novel orchestrator in T1D pathogenesis. Front Immunol 2022. 13 917577. ( 10.3389/fimmu.2022.917577) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kendall PL, Yu G, Woodward EJ, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures in the pancreas promote selection of B lymphocytes in autoimmune diabetes. J Immunol 2007. 178 5643–5651. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.178.9.5643) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Korpos É, Kadri N, Loismann S, et al. Identification and characterisation of tertiary lymphoid organs in human type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2021. 64 1626–1641. ( 10.1007/s00125-021-05453-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Costanzo A, Clarke D, Holt M, et al. Repositioning the early pathology of type 1 diabetes to the extraislet vasculature. J Immunol 2024. 212 1094–1104. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.2300769) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Banerjee D, Paul S, Selvan C, et al. Uncovering the role of tertiary lymphoid organs in the inflammatory landscape: a novel immunophenotype of diabetic foot ulcers. J Cell Mol Med 2025. 29 e70479. ( 10.1111/jcmm.70479) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Henry RA & Kendall PL. CXCL13 blockade disrupts B lymphocyte organization in tertiary lymphoid structures without altering B cell receptor bias or preventing diabetes in Nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol 2010. 185 1460–1465. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.0903710) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Astorri E, Bombardieri M, Gabba S, et al. Evolution of ectopic lymphoid neogenesis and in situ autoantibody production in autoimmune nonobese diabetic mice: cellular and molecular characterization of tertiary lymphoid structures in pancreatic islets. J Immunol 2010. 185 3359–3368. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.1001836) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Willcox A, Richardson SJ, Bone AJ, et al. Analysis of islet inflammation in human type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 2009. 155 173–181. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03860) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Xiang X, Huang X, Zhang Z, et al. Dysregulation of circulating CD4 + CXCR5 + PD-1+ T cells in diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complicat 2023. 37 108420. ( 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2023.108420) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Fan P, Ye H, Zhu C, et al. Exploring the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis accompanied by diabetic foot ulcers using microarray data analysis. Medicine 2023. 102 e33962. ( 10.1097/md.0000000000033962) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Liu S, Liu X, Xiong H, et al. CXCL13/CXCR5 signaling contributes to diabetes-induced tactile allodynia via activating pERK, pSTAT3, pAKT pathways and pro-inflammatory cytokines production in the spinal cord of male mice. Brain Behav Immun 2019. 80 711–724. ( 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.05.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chen Y, Wu J, Wong C, et al. Disturbed glycolipid metabolism activates CXCL13-CXCR5 axis in senescent TSCs to promote heterotopic ossification. Cell Mol Life Sci 2024. 81 265. ( 10.1007/s00018-024-05302-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zhang Y, Zhou H, Liu J, et al. Identification of key genes and immune infiltration of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in mice and humans based on bioinformatics analysis. Front Endocrinol 2024. 15 1437979. ( 10.3389/fendo.2024.1437979) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Cao B, Liu N & Wang W. High glucose prevents osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via lncRNA AK028326/CXCL13 pathway. Biomed Pharmacother 2016. 84 544–551. ( 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.058) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Jiang H, Wang Y, Meng J, et al. Effects of transplanting bone marrow stromal cells transfected with CXCL13 on fracture healing of diabetic rats. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018. 49 123–133. ( 10.1159/000492848) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995. 92 1355–1374. ( 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1355) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Jones PW, Mallat Z & Nus M. T-cell/B-cell interactions in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2024. 44 1502–1511. ( 10.1161/atvbaha.124.319845) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kyaw T, Tay C, Krishnamurthi S, et al. B1a B lymphocytes are atheroprotective by secreting natural IgM that increases IgM deposits and reduces necrotic cores in atherosclerotic lesions. Circ Res 2011. 109 830–840. ( 10.1161/circresaha.111.248542) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Smedbakken LM, Halvorsen B, Daissormont I, et al. Increased levels of the homeostatic chemokine CXCL13 in human atherosclerosis – potential role in plaque stabilization. Atherosclerosis 2012. 224 266–273. ( 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.06.071) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Halvorsen B, Smedbakken LM, Michelsen AE, et al. Activated platelets promote increased monocyte expression of CXCR5 through prostaglandin E2-related mechanisms and enhance the anti-inflammatory effects of CXCL13. Atherosclerosis 2014. 234 352–359. ( 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.03.021) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.van der Vorst EPC, Daissormont I, Aslani M, et al. Interruption of the CXCL13/CXCR5 chemokine axis enhances plasma IgM levels and attenuates atherosclerosis development. Thromb Haemost 2019. 120 344–347. ( 10.1055/s-0039-3400746) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Edgel KA, LeBoeuf RC & Oram JF. Tumor necrosis factor-α and lymphotoxin-α increase macrophage ABCA1 by gene expression and protein stabilization via different receptors. Atherosclerosis 2010. 209 387–392. ( 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.10.019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lötzer K, Döpping S, Connert S, et al. Mouse aorta smooth muscle cells differentiate into lymphoid tissue organizer-like cells on combined tumor necrosis factor receptor-1/lymphotoxin β-receptor NF-κB signaling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010. 30 395–402. ( 10.1161/atvbaha.109.191395) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Gräbner R, Lötzer K, Döpping S, et al. Lymphotoxin β receptor signaling promotes tertiary lymphoid organogenesis in the aorta adventitia of agedApoE−/− mice. J Exp Med 2009. 206 233–248. ( 10.1084/jem.20080752) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Jin Q, Zhang C, Chen R, et al. Quinic acid regulated TMA/TMAO-related lipid metabolism and vascular endothelial function through gut microbiota to inhibit atherosclerotic. J Transl Med 2024. 22 352. ( 10.1186/s12967-024-05120-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.van Dijk RA, Duinisveld AJF, Schaapherder AF, et al. A change in inflammatory footprint precedes plaque instability: a systematic evaluation of cellular aspects of the adaptive immune response in human atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2015. 4 e001403. ( 10.1161/jaha.114.001403) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hu D, Mohanta S, Yin C, et al. Artery tertiary lymphoid organs control aorta immunity and protect against atherosclerosis via vascular smooth muscle cell lymphotoxin β receptors. Immunity 2015. 42 1100–1115. ( 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Sahini N & Borlak J. Genomics of human fatty liver disease reveal mechanistically linked lipid droplet–associated gene regulations in bland steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Transl Res 2016. 177 41–69. ( 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.06.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bigorgne AE, Bouchet–Delbos L, Naveau S, et al. Obesity-induced lymphocyte hyperresponsiveness to chemokines: a new mechanism of fatty liver inflammation in obese mice. Gastroenterology 2008. 134 1459–1469.e1452. ( 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Kim NH, Kim MY, Yang YM, et al. Bacterial components‐driven intrahepatic CXCR5hi B cells are important population for MASH progression through inducing inflammation. FASEB J 2025. 39 e70322. ( 10.1096/fj.202401256R) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhao Q, Wu J, Feng M, et al. CXCL13 suppresses liver regeneration through the negative regulation of HGF signaling. Cell Death Dis 2025. 16 361. ( 10.1038/s41419-025-07568-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zheng K, Dai L, Zhang S, et al. Unraveling the heterogeneity of CD8+ T-cell subsets in liver cirrhosis: implications for disease progression. Gut Liver 2024. 19 410–426. ( 10.5009/gnl230345) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Zhai R, Feng L, Zhang Y, et al. Combined transcriptomic and lipidomic analysis reveals dysregulated genes expression and lipid metabolism profiles in the early stage of fatty liver disease in rats. Front Nutr 2021. 8 733197. ( 10.3389/fnut.2021.733197) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Li C, Kang D, Sun X, et al. The effect of C-X-C motif chemokine 13 on hepatocellular carcinoma associates with wnt signaling. Biomed Res Int 2015. 2015 1–8. ( 10.1155/2015/345413) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Li Y, Wang W, Tang L, et al. Chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 13 promotes intrahepatic chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) receptor 5+ lymphocyte homing and aberrant B‐cell immune responses in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2015. 61 1998–2007. ( 10.1002/hep.27725) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hsu C-L, Ou D-L, Bai L-Y, et al. Exploring markers of exhausted CD8 T cells to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 2021. 10 346–359. ( 10.1159/000515305) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Rubio T, Felipo V, Tarazona S, et al. Multi-omic analysis unveils biological pathways in peripheral immune system associated to minimal hepatic encephalopathy appearance in cirrhotic patients. Sci Rep 2021. 11 1907. ( 10.1038/s41598-020-80941-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Dolapchiev L, Gonzales K, Cruz Graham L, et al. Gut microbiome and hepatic transcriptomic determinants of HCC development in mice with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024. 11 1891–1905. ( 10.2147/jhc.S485532) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Meng J, Lv Q, Sui A, et al. Hyperuricemia induces lipid disturbances by upregulating the CXCL-13 pathway. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2022. 322 G256–G267. ( 10.1152/ajpgi.00285.2021) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Duan Z, Gao J, Zhang L, et al. Phenotype and function of CXCR5+CD45RA−CD4+ T cells were altered in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated serum CXCL13 predicted better prognosis. Oncotarget 2015. 6 44239–44253. ( 10.18632/oncotarget.6235) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of Bioscientifica Ltd.

RESOURCES