Skip to main content
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine logoLink to Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
. 2026 Mar 14;22:41. doi: 10.1186/s13002-026-00883-8

Traditional ecological knowledge of wild edible plants in the Dai communities of Lujiangba area, western Yunnan, China

Xian Hu 1,2, Lianli Bai 3, Miaomiao Wang 1,4,5, Qingyu Chen 1,4,5, Congli Xu 3, Chunlin Long 1,4,5,6,
PMCID: PMC13101136  PMID: 41832560

Abstract

Background

The Dai people of Lujiangba area, Baoshan, Yunnan Province, have rich knowledge of collecting and consuming wild edible plants (WEPs). These plants contribute significantly to local food security, nutrition, and cultural identity. Rapid economic development and environmental changes threaten the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of WEPs. However, few research or inventory of such TEK had been completed.

Methods

This study adopted ethnobotanical research methods, including semi-structured interviews and participatory observation, involving 147 local participants. Data were analyzed using the relative citation frequency (RCF) index to determine commonly used species, traditional harvesting techniques, and conservation strategies.

Results

In the Lujiangba area, a total of 177 wild edible plants (WEPs) were documented among the Dai people, representing 64 families. Herbaceous species predominated, comprising 63.84% of the recorded flora, with leaves (58.19%) and stems (55.93%) as the principal edible parts. Vegetables (67.23%) and herbal medicine (29.38%) constituted the primary categories of utilization. Among these species, 171 were wild, while 66 were cultivated either in situ or in translocated sites, primarily distributed across homegardens, mountainous areas, and ricefields. Approximately 50.85% of wild edible plants required management interventions such as weeding, irrigating, or fertilizing, whereas 10.73% did not require any additional management. Harvesting exhibited distinct seasonality, predominantly occurring in spring (69.49%), followed by summer and autumn, with minimal activity in winter; only 2.82% of species were harvested year-round. Through RFC value, the more significant plants are: Diplazium esculentum, Elsholtzia kachinensis, Lasia spinosa, and Buddleja officinalis. These findings indicate that this pattern demonstrates the high degree of cultural adaptation embedded within their traditional ecological knowledge regarding species selection, management practices, and seasonal utilization. Furthermore, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of wild edible plants (WEPs) is in danger of being lost due to the influence of modern life and generations.

Conclusions

The Dai people of the Lujiangba area exhibit profound TEK in their use of WEPs. The traditional ecological knowledge not only supports the sustainable use of plant resources but also embodies the Dai people’s cultural identity and regional heritage, highlighting the importance of preserving and transmitting this knowledge to maintain local biodiversity and promote food security and cultural continuity. Furthermore, both in situ and ex situ conservation strategies can mitigate the loss of TEK. However, additional measures are required, including the development of comprehensive databases, the integration of TEK with scientific knowledge, and the promotion of multidisciplinary and cross-cultural exchange.

Keywords: Dai community, Wild edible plants, Traditional ecological knowledge, Ethnobotany, Ecological sustainability

Background

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) refers to the knowledge systems that humans have developed through long-term interaction with the natural environment, encompassing the identification, use, management, and protection of biological resources. It is deeply embedded in local cultures and livelihood practices [1, 2]. In recent years, against the backdrop of global environmental change, ecological degradation, and cultural homogenization, TEK has gained increasing attention in the fields of ethnobiology and ethnoecology as a crucial resource for understanding human–environment relationships, promoting ecological sustainability, and safeguarding cultural diversity [3, 4]. As an important component of TEK, knowledge of wild edible plants (WEPs) not only reflects the reliance of local communities on natural resources but also represents cultural variation in food choices, health concepts, and ecological adaptation strategies among different ethnic groups [57].

Wild edible plants (WEPs) are naturally occurring plant species that grow without deliberate cultivation or domestication and can be consumed directly or after processing [8]. They are widely distributed worldwide, particularly in regions with high biodiversity. WEPs play essential roles in food security, nutritional supplementation, traditional culture, and local livelihoods [9, 10]. For many communities, WEPs are integral not only to daily diets but also to traditional medicine, cultural ceremonies, and ecological management systems [1113]. In the context of accelerating climate change, biodiversity loss, and food insecurity, WEPs have attracted increasing attention due to their nutritional value and ecological adaptability [1416]. Meanwhile, with the growing standardization of global food systems and rapid changes in traditional lifestyles, the documentation and study of TEK associated with WEPs have become increasingly urgent [1719]. Within TEK systems, WEPs represent a key interface between ecological knowledge, food practices, and adaptive strategies to environmental variability.

Southwestern China represents a typical region where biological and cultural diversity intersect. Yunnan Province, characterized by complex topography, diverse climatic zones, and highly concentrated ethnic cultures, has become a key area for TEK research [2022]. The Dai people, an important Indigenous ethnic group in Yunnan, maintain livelihoods closely associated with river valleys, terraced landscapes, and low mountain forest ecosystems [23]. Over generations, they have developed extensive knowledge regarding the identification of wild plants, taste preferences, seasonal harvesting, and ecological management practices [24]. However, existing research on the Dai people has largely focused on medicinal plants [25], cultivated crops [26], or traditional medical systems [27], with limited systematic, region-specific, and quantitative studies on their TEK of WEPs. Moreover, with the intensification of modern agriculture, out-migration of young people for work, and increased dependence on market vegetables, knowledge about the collection, use, and management of wild plants within Dai communities is diminishing, resulting in intergenerational gaps and risks of cultural erosion [2830]. To date, no quantitative, TEK-oriented ethnobotanical study has systematically examined WEP knowledge, use, and management among Dai communities in dry-hot valley environments.

The Lujiangba area, located in a typical dry and hot valley in Yunnan, features a unique combination of dry–hot climate, river-valley landforms, and distinct vegetation assemblages, which together create highly heterogeneous ecological habitats and rich wild plant resources [31, 32]. The Dai community in this region has long engaged in rice cultivation, forest-product gathering, and small-scale farming, maintaining close interactions with surrounding mountains, river valleys, and forest edges. Through these practices, they have accumulated region-specific knowledge of WEPs utilization and ecological management [23, 24]. However, systematic ethnobotanical research on the Dai community in Lujiangba area remains limited, especially studies that take a TEK perspective to comprehensively examine the structure, functions, and contemporary socio-ecological challenges of traditional knowledge related to wild plants [25].

Therefore, this study takes the Dai community in the Lujiangba area of western Yunnan as a case study to address analytical questions concerning the structure, drivers, and dynamics of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of wild edible plants (WEPs). We hypothesize that (i) the composition and uses of WEPs among Dai communities show distinct species composition and utilization patterns compared with non–Dai ethnic groups in China; (ii) local ecological factors, particularly altitude gradients and land-use systems, significantly influence species selection, utilization patterns, and ecological management strategies of WEPs; and (iii) socio-economic transformation and market integration are associated with intergenerational differences in knowledge transmission, leading to both transformation and partial erosion of TEK. To test these hypotheses, we employed participatory observation, semi-structured interviews, and quantitative ethnobotanical methods to analyze species diversity, utilization patterns, ecological management practices, and age-related knowledge variation. By doing so, this study aims to contribute to broader cross-cultural ethnobotanical discussions and to provide insights relevant for the conservation of biocultural diversity, the safeguarding of traditional knowledge, and the sustainable management of wild plant resources.

Methods

Study area

As shown in Fig. 1, the study site is located in the Lujiangba area, Baoshan, Yunnan Province, China. Known as Menghe in the Dai language, Lujiangba lies in the western part of Yunnan and comprises low-altitude basin within the Nujiang River valley. The area is predominantly hilly, with elevations ranging from 738 to 1,189 m above sea level. It benefits from abundant sunlight, remains frost-free year-round, and is recognized as one of China’s few representative subtropical dry-hot river valleys [33, 34]. The study was conducted in Bingmen and Moka villages, two administrative villages located in the Nu River valley of Lujiang Township, western Yunnan, China. According to Gazetteer of Lujiang Dai Township provided by The People’s Government of Lujiang Town, Longyang District, Yunnan Province [35], Bingmen Village is located at 25.07°N, 98.84°E, approximately 18 km from the township center. Moka Village is located at 24.98°N, 98.85°E. Both villages lie within valley and foothill landscapes influenced by the Nu River and its tributaries and adjacent to the Gaoligong Mountain region.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location of study area of Baoshan City, Yunnan Province, China

As shown in Table 1, Bingmen Village occupies a total land area of approximately 19,967 mu (1 mu = 1/15 ha), including about 4,498 mu of cultivated land composed of paddy fields and sloping dry fields. The village consists of six natural villages and seven agricultural production groups. The total population is 1,621 residents from 360 households. Local residents identify themselves primarily as Dai, with smaller numbers of Lisu, Han, and Bai inhabitants. Dai residents speak Dai languages belonging to the Southwestern Tai branch of the Tai–Kadai language family, while Lisu residents speak Lisu (Sino-Tibetan, Lolo-Burmese branch). Mandarin Chinese is commonly used for interethnic communication. The dominant religious belief among Dai residents is Theravada Buddhism, which plays an important role in shaping daily practices, seasonal activities, and interactions with the surrounding environment. Bingmen Village lies at an average elevation of about 800 m above sea level, with a mean annual temperature of approximately 20 °C and annual precipitation of around 1,000 mm. Local livelihoods are centered on agriculture, particularly sugarcane, coffee, and rice, supplemented by fruit crops such as mango, longan, lychee, banana, and pomegranate. The Kunbeng and Puchong rivers flow through the village landscape, supporting irrigation and providing habitats for wild edible plants.

Table 1.

Socio-ecological characteristics of two villages investigated

Item Bingmen Village Moka Village
GPS 25.07°N, 98.84°E 24.98°N, 98.85°E
Altitude 800 m 1,020–1,300 m
Ecology Hot and dry river-valley environment; valley floor and foothills influenced by the Nu River and tributaries Valley plains and gentle hills with fertile soil
Ethnicity Primarily Dai; Lisu, Han, and Bai residents Predominantly Dai
Language Dai language; Lisu languag; Mandarin Chinese Dai language; Mandarin Chinese
Religion Theravada Buddhism Theravada Buddhism
Number of inhabitants

360 households;

1,621 residents

392 households;

1,675 residents

Moka Village covers approximately 12,831 mu (1 mu = 1/15 ha) and comprises seven natural villages, all locally recognized as long-established Dai settlements. The village had 392 households and a population of 1,675 residents, of whom nearly 90% identify themselves as Dai. The Dai language of the Southwestern Tai branch (Tai–Kadai family) is widely spoken in daily life, alongside Mandarin Chinese. Theravada Buddhism is the primary religious belief and is closely integrated into community life, agricultural cycles, and traditional knowledge transmission. Elevations range from approximately 1,020 to 1,300 m, and the landscape is characterized by fertile valley plains, gentle hills, and well-developed irrigation systems supplied by local rivers and springs. Agricultural production focuses on sugarcane, coffee, and rice, with additional crops including mango, longan, banana, lychee, and aromatic tobacco. Moka has long been locally recognized as a major sugarcane-producing area.

Despite differences in size and ethnic composition, Bingmen and Moka villages share similar ecological conditions, subsistence strategies, languages, and religious believes. In both villages, the collection and use of wild edible plants are embedded in Dai cultural practices and Buddhist worldviews and remain important components of local food systems. These shared characteristics make the two villages appropriate and complementary sites for investigating traditional ecological knowledge and the contemporary use of wild edible plants in the Lujiangba area.

Fieldwork and data collection

Prior to fieldwork, a comprehensive review and synthesis of published literature and local gazetteers on Dai traditional ecological knowledge and wild plant use in Yunnan were conducted. We reviewed historical developments, cultural contexts, and documented management practices of wild edible plants, providing a theoretical and contextual foundation for the field investigation. The investigation was conducted from July 2023 to August 2024. A total of five field investigations were carried out based on the growth habits of the wild edible plants in Moka and Bingmen villages. This research followed the ethical guidelines of the American Anthropological Association [36] and the International Society for Ethnobiology [37]. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the objectives and procedures of the study were clearly explained to them in advance. Participants expressed their understanding and support for the research.

This study employed a mixed-methods approach that integrated qualitative and quantitative techniques to investigate the traditional management of wild edible plants among the Dai people in the Lujiangba area. Ethnobotanical methods included participatory observation, semi-structured interviews, and snowball sampling to document traditional ecological knowledge and plant-use practices (Fig. 2). Fieldwork was carried out in Bingmen and Moka villages through participatory observation. Researchers accompanied community members in activities such as plant gathering, management of semi-wild species, processing and preparation of wild edible plants. Initial key informants were identified with the assistance of village leaders and community elders, based on their recognized knowledge of local plants and subsistence practices. Subsequently, a snowball sampling approach was applied, whereby each interviewed participant recommended other community members who were considered knowledgeable about wild edible plants, including experienced foragers, farmers, home gardeners, and elders. This iterative process allowed the research team to reach individuals with diverse expertise and social roles while ensuring that locally recognized knowledge holders were included.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ethnoecological surveys of traditional management in Lujiangba area. (a)-(d). Semi-structured interview; (e)-(f). Participative observation. All people in the pictures have agreed to put their photos in the publications

A total of 147 people were interviewed, who were familiar with the specific information of this research of wild edible plants. Interview topics included the wild edible plants’ natural habitats, harvesting seasons, and cultivation techniques. As shown in Table 2, the sample consisted of approximately equal numbers of men and women, with a relatively even distribution across age groups. Notably, most middle-aged and elderly participants have resided in the Lujiangba area for their entire lives, demonstrating adaptability to and understanding of the local ecological and social environment. The interviews covered the following key areas:

Table 2.

Demographics of participants

Characteristics Number of respondents %
Sex Male 75 51.06
Female 72 48.94
Age 20–39 32 21.76
40–59 50 34.01
60–79 56 38.09
>80 9 6.12
Formal education Illiterate 35 23.81
Primary school 72 48.98
Middle school 28 19.05
High school 6 4.08
College 6 4.08
Main occupation Farmer 109 74.14
Public official 19 12.93
Others 19 12.93
  1. People’s demographic information, including name, nationality, age, gender, and educational background;

  2. The types, edible parts, harvest periods, and uses of wild edible plants;

  3. The number of collections and the preferred types of wild edible plants;

  4. The management strategies of wild edible plants.

Data analysis

Quantitative statistical methods were applied to systematically organize and analyze the data obtained from semi-structured interviews and participatory observations, with a particular emphasis on assessing the diversity and cultural importance of wild edible plants. To evaluate the relative cultural importance of each recorded species, the relative frequency of citation (RFC) index was calculated. It was determined using the following formula:

graphic file with name d33e605.gif

where FC represents the number of participants citing a particular species and N is the total number of participants participating in the survey [11, 38].

In addition, the Jaccard similarity index (JI) was employed to conduct comparative analyses between the present study and previously published ethnobotanical studies from neighboring regions or different ethnic groups. The Jaccard index was calculated using the following formula:

graphic file with name d33e744.gif

where A and B represent the total number of species recorded in each study and C denotes the number of species shared by both datasets [42].

ArcGIS 10.8 was used to make maps of the survey areas, while Origin 2021 and R 4.4.1 were employed to conduct data analysis and produce statistical graphs.

Plant specimens were identified by Professor Long Chunlin. All specimens have been deposited in the herbarium at Minzu University of China. Taxonomic classification follows the APG IV system [39], with nomenclature based on the Flora of China (https://www.iplant.cn) [40] and World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org) [41]. The compiled data are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

The inventory of wild edible plants in Lujiangba area

Scientific name Dai name Family name Used parts Preparations Uses RFC Voucher number
Achyranthes aspera L. Huai o long Amaranthaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.2835 NJB170
Acmella paniculata (Wall. ex DC.) R. K. Jansen Ya pa pi Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2992 NJB128
Acorus calamus L. Han hao pa Araceae Rhizome Prepared as a soup Medicine; ornamental plant 0.6142 NJB095
Acorus gramineus Soland. San bu pa Araceae Rhizome Prepared as a soup Herb 0.1890 NJB129
Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. Duo hong long Rosaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB140
Allium macrostemon Bunge Pa hao Liliaceae Bulb Stir-fried Vegetable 0.3780 NJB176
Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. ex DC. Pa biu Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2756 NJB044
Amaranthus blitum L. Pa hong kei Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5984 NJB001
Amaranthus viridis L. Pa hong nan Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2677 NJB079
Amaranthus retroflexus L. Pa hong nan Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5354 NJB109
Amaranthus spinosus L. Pa hong kei Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5669 NJB014
Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis Pa bang wa Basellaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5276 NJB142
Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem. Mai guo Araliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6142 NJB100
Aralia thomsonii Seem. Dang gai Araliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6063 NJB190
Artemisia argyi H. Lév. & Vaniot Ya mi Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.5276 NJB084
Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott Peng dou duo Amaranthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB104
Bauhinia variegata var. candida (Roxb.) Voigt Mai xiu Fabaceae Flower Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; ornamental plant 0.6929 NJB024
Bidens pilosa L. Ya jing bu Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.7717 NJB027
Bombax ceiba L. Mai niu Malvaceae Flower Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.5118 NJB050
Broussonetia papyrifera (Linnaeus) L’Heritier ex Ventenat Guo sha Moraceae Male inflorescence Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.7008 NJB026
Buddleja officinalis Maxim. Luo fan Loganiaceae Flower Infused as tea or steamed with rice Dye 0.8661 NJB048
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. Hu sheng cao Brassicaceae Tender stem and leaf; root Blanched and served cold or processed into fillings Vegetable 0.6929 NJB035
Caragana sinica (Buc’hoz) Rehder Duo he ne Fabaceae Flower Pan-fried with eggs Vegetable 0.5118 NJB039
Carica papaya L. Ma gui sha bao Caricaceae Fruit Consumed fresh or boiled Snack 0.6220 NJB022
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Pa nuo Apiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6850 NJB033
Chenopodium album L. Pa hong ge Chenopodiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5984 NJB042
Chenopodium ficifolium Smith Pa hong ge Chenopodiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6142 NJB066
Chimonobambusa quadrangularis (Franceschi) Makino Man bang Poaceae Tender shoot Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5827 NJB110
Choerospondias axillaris (Roxb.) B. L. Burtt & A. W. Hill Mang men Anacardiaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.5276 NJB054
Chrysanthemum indicum L. Pa ba dui Asteraceae Flower Boiled in water Tea substitute; medicine 0.5984 NJB182
Cirsium japonicum Fisch. ex DC. Ya xian duo Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf; root Prepared as a soup Vegetable; medicine 0.6220 NJB036
Clerodendrum bungei Steud. Bing hao Viticoideae Flower; leaf Steamed together with eggs Vegetable; medicine; ornamental plant 0.4252 NJB009
Clinopodium chinense (Benth.) Kuntze Peng hen long Lamiaceae Tender shoots Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.1890 NJB112
Coix lacryma-jobi L. Ma nei niu Poaceae Seed Cooked as porridge Food substitute 0.5276 NJB187
Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott Bo rui Araceae Rhizome; flower; petiole Consumed after steaming, boiling, or stewing Vegetable; food substitute 0.7402 NJB076
Commelina communis L. Ya song Commelinaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2677 NJB069
Cornus officinalis Siebold & Zucc. Pa ma ha leng Cornaceae Fruit Boiled Medicine 0.3543 NJB161
Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S. Moore Ya ge la Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.6063 NJB073
Crateva unilocularis Buchanan-Hamilton Pa gong Capparaceae Tender stem and leaf Pickled Vegetable 0.6063 NJB060
Crotalaria pallida Aiton Pa nuo pa Fabaceae Fruit Boiled Medicine 0.1654 NJB193
Cryptotaenia japonica Hassk. Pa nuo han Apiaceae Tender stem and leaf Stir-fried with pork Vegetable 0.6063 NJB179
Cucumis hystrix Chakr. Ma nong huo Cucurbitaceae Fruit Stir-fried Snack 0.4331 NJB072
Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Luan nan gai Orchidaceae Stem Prepared as a soup Tea substitute 0.5512 NJB058
Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. ex Munro Mai bang lang Poaceae Shoot Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; construction material 0.5984 NJB141
Dicliptera chinensis (L.) Juss. Ya ke suo Acanthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB025
Diospyros kaki Thunb. Ye he teng Ebenaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.4409 NJB164
Diospyros lotus L. Mai gang Ebenaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack; medicine 0.2677 NJB132
Diplazium esculentum (Retz.) Sm. Guo gun Athyriaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried with fermented beans Vegetable 0.9606 NJB007
Docynia delavayi (Franch.) Schneid. Ma guo mian Rosaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.6850 NJB077
Dregea volubilis (L. f.) Benth. ex Hook. f. Wu mu Apocynaceae Flower; tender stem and leaf Pan-fried with eggs Vegetable 0.7008 NJB053
Dryopteris crassirhizoma Nakai Gu dang Dryopteridaceae Tender stem and leaf; petiole Blanched and then stir-fried with fermented black beans Vegetable 0.4409 NJB101
Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke Ma xi nan mie Rosaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.4331 NJB163
Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. Huang jiu Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2598 NJB135
Elaeagnus conferta Roxb. Ha ma luan Elaeagnaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.5906 NJB047
Elephantopus scaber L. Ya din dian Asteraceae Root Blanched and then stir-fried Medicine 0.3386 NJB019
Eleutherococcus setosus (H. L. Li) Y. R. Ling Guo dang gai; Pa ke bian Araliaceae Tender stem and leaf; root Blanched and served cold Vegetable 0.6142 NJB023
Eleutherococcus trifoliatus (L.) S. Y. Hu Ha bing Araliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3543 NJB002
Elsholtzia kachinensis Prain Pa leng Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Served cold or cooked as a soup Vegetable; spice 0.9528 NJB062
Elsholtzia rugulosa Hemsl. La you ma Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Tea substitute; medicine 0.6220 NJB070
Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC. Pa nan Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.1732 NJB185
Epilobium hirsutum L. Nuo dong Onagraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4331 NJB139
Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl. Pa ba Rosaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack; medicine 0.5433 NJB151
Eryngium foetidum L. Pa beng le mang Apiaceae Tender leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; spice 0.7717 NJB011
Euryale ferox Salisb. ex K.D.Koenig & Sims Ma hong nuo Nymphaeaceae Kernel Cooked as porridge Medicine 0.5354 NJB154
Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) Hara Pa ge mong Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4331 NJB038
Ficus racemosa L. Guo mai hu zhuang Moraceae Tender stem and leaf; fruit Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; snack 0.5669 NJB040
Ficus semicordata Buch.-Ham. ex J. E. Smith Guo de Moraceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.7087 NJB032
Ficus virens Aiton Mi nuo Moraceae Tender stem and leaf Consumed fresh Vegetable; snack 0.6142 NJB029
Ficus auriculata Lour. Pa luo Moraceae Tender stem and leaf; fruit Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; snack 0.6142 NJB017
Galinsoga parviflora Cav. Pa man Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3701 NJB149
Gardenia jasminoides J.Ellis Mo bai ha Rubiaceae Fruit Stewed as a soup Medicine 0.4409 NJB191
Glechoma longituba (Nakai) Kupr. Ya min long Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Medicine 0.5984 NJB125
Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino Ya ha bai Cucurbitaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Medicine 0.4331 NJB126
Gynura divaricata (L.) DC. Peng na dang Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2677 NJB003
Hibiscus syriacus L. Luo mai liang long Malvaceae Flower Stewed together with pork Vegetable; medicine 0.5197 NJB146
Houpoea officinalis (Rehder & E. H. Wilson) N. H. Xia & C. Y. Wu Pa po Magnoliaceae Bark Cooked as a soup Medicine 0.3465 NJB121
Houttuynia cordata Thunb. Pa hao dong Saururaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.7795 NJB034
Hovenia acerba Lindl. Mai sha Rhamnaceae Fruit Consumed fresh Snack 0.5276 NJB192
Imperata cylindrica (L.) P. Beauv. Hua huan Poaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.3543 NJB088
Lasia spinosa (L.) Thwaites Pan meng lang Araceae Tender stem and leaf; petiole Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.8819 NJB015
Lepidium apetalum Willd. Pi nan Brassicaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2677 NJB108
Ligusticum sinense ‘Chuanxiong’ Ge xing Apiaceae Root Prepared as a soup Vegetable; medicine 0.6142 NJB097
Lilium brownii var. viridulum Baker Pa luo nong Liliaceae Bulb Consumed after steaming or boiling Vegetable, medicine; ornamental plant 0.5827 NJB091
Liriope spicata (Thunb.) Lour. Pa leng Liliaceae Root Prepared as a soup Vegetable 0.2598 NJB160
Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. Guo sha hai teng Lauraceae Fruit Cooked as a soup Vegetable; spice 0.5433 NJB056
Lonicera japonica Thunb. Wo hao lin Caprifoliaceae Flower Boiled in water Medicine 0.6929 NJB155
Lycium chinense Mill. Ge ji Solanaceae Tender shoot Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB114
Lysimachia clethroides Duby Ya hai ba Primulaceae Tender leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB083
Manihot esculenta Crantz Men niu Euphorbiaceae Rhizome Boiled Food substitute 0.4331 NJB052
Melia azedarach L. Mei heng Meliaceae Fruit Boiled Medicine 0.1654 NJB137
Mentha canadensis L. Huang nen Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Served cold Herb; ornamental plant 0.7874 NJB004
Mirabilis jalapa L. Nuo wai niang Nyctaginaceae Flower Stir-fried with meat Medicine; ornamental plant 0.5118 NJB195
Momordica cochinchinensis (Lour.) Spreng. Ma xi ga Cucurbitaceae Seed Stewed as a soup Medicine 0.3543 NJB145
Morus alba L. Mai mang Moraceae Fruit; tender stem and leaf Consumed fresh Vegetable; snack 0.5512 NJB055
Musa acuminata Colla Gui huang Musaceae Flower Consumed fresh Vegetable; snack 0.7008 NJB065
Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Pa hong Nymphaeaceae Tender stem and leaf; flower Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.6850 NJB136
Nepeta cataria L. Guang guo Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Served cold or cooked as a soup Herb; medicine 0.7795 NJB130
Ocimum basilicum L. Guang guo Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Served cold or cooked as a soup Herb 0.6142 NJB045
Oenanthe javanica (Blume) DC. Pa an e Apiaceae Tender stems and leaves Stir-fried or served cold Vegetable 0.6299 NJB166
Oroxylum indicum (L.) Kurz Lin deng a Bignoniaceae Fruit Infused as tea with honey Vegetable 0.5512 NJB049
Oxalis corniculata L. Song xiang ga Oxalidaceae Tender leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6142 NJB082
Oxalis corymbosa DC. Luo han song xiang ga Oxalidaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.0945 NJB119
Paederia foetida L. Ke dun ma Rubiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5197 NJB031
Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz. Ya gan zhuang Liliaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.7087 NJB107
Pastinaca sativa L. Fang feng Apiaceae Root Stewed as a soup Medicine 0.4409 NJB173
Patrinia monandra C. B. Clarke Mie heng Valerianaceae Root; tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.0945 NJB162
Patrinia scabiosifolia Fisch. ex Trevir. Ya xian long Caprifoliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2598 NJB092
Patrinia villosa (Thunb.) Juss. Ga dong bian Valerianaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5276 NJB150
Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton Zha a liang Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Served cold or cooked as a soup Herb 0.7717 NJB081
Persicaria chinensis (L.) H. Gross Song bie Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB030
Persicaria orientalis (L.) Spach Mei hong Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Cooked together with fish Vegetable 0.1181 NJB120
Persicaria perfoliata (L.) H. Gross Dun xiao teng Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and served cold Vegetable 0.2283 NJB133
Persicaria viscosa (Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don) H. Gross ex Nakai Fei man Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Cooked together with fish Herb 0.5984 NJB064
Phyllanthus emblica L. Ma ka m Phyllanthaceae Fruit Consumed fresh or soaked in water Snack 0.6142 NJB075
Phyllanthus urinaria L. Ya hai ba Phyllanthaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.4409 NJB184
Phyllostachys edulis (Carrière) J. Houz. Mai bang Poaceae Tender shoots Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5984 NJB144
Phyllostachys sulphurea var. viridis R.A.Young Mai chang han Poaceae Tender shoot Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5669 NJB113
Picris divaricata Vaniot Fan p.a. ga Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3543 NJB106
Pimpinella candolleana Wight & Arn. Pa dian hao Apiaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.6850 NJB177
Piper sarmentosum Roxb. Pa xie Piperaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4094 NJB037
Plantago asiatica L. Ya ying re Plantaginaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.7717 NJB008
Pleuropterus multiflorus (Thunb.) Nakai Nuo ya zai Polygonaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.5748 NJB118
Pogostemon amaranthoides Benth. Bai mai lei k Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf; root Blanched and served cold or cooked as a soup Vegetable 0.7480 NJB021
Polygonatum cirrhifolium (Wall.) Royle Ma wei gen Liliaceae Tender stem and leaf; root Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; food substitute; medicine 0.4409 NJB041
Polygonatum kingianum Collett & Hemsl. Ma wei gen Liliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; food substitute; ornamental plant 0.7087 NJB020
Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce Ya nan lang Liliaceae Tender stem and leaf Prepared as a soup Vegetable; food substitute 0.5354 NJB189
Polygonatum sibiricum Redouté Mang han Liliaceae Root Prepared as a soup Medicine 0.6220 NJB124
Pontederia vaginalis Burm. f. Pa hen Pontederiaceae Tender leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4882 NJB068
Portulaca oleracea L. Pa bo liang Portulacaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6929 NJB046
Potentilla chinensis Ser. Nan p.a. ma Rosaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3386 NJB172
Prunella vulgaris L. Ya gui wen Lamiaceae Tender stem and leaf Boiled in water Medicine; tea substitute 0.5118 NJB175
Pseudognaphalium affine (D. Don) Anderb. Pa gao Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Processed into fillings Vegetable 0.3543 NJB165
Pyrus pashia Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don Guo kei gai Rosaceae Flower Pan-fried with eggs Vegetable 0.5197 NJB010
Reynoutria japonica Houtt. Bi bi han Polygonaceae Root Blanched and then stir-fried Medicine 0.2756 NJB122
Rhododendron decorum Franch. De chang Ericaceae Flower Blanched and then stir-fried with pork Vegetable; ornamental plant 0.5276 NJB016
Rhus chinensis Mill. Guo ma po Anacardiaceae Fruit Stewed together with meat Medicine 0.5276 NJB180
Robinia pseudoacacia L. Ya la meng long Fabaceae Flower Steamed Vegetable 0.3858 NJB099
Rorippa indica (L.) Hiern Pa ya guo mu Brassicaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB028
Rumex acetosa L. Pa ling Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2362 NJB168
Rumex japonicus Houtt. Pa ya teng Polygonaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3780 NJB181
Sagittaria trifolia L. Ya gan gai Alismataceae Rhizome Boiled Vegetable 0.3465 NJB071
Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Dan shen Lamiaceae Root Stewed as a soup Medicine 0.4646 NJB103
Saposhnikovia divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk. Fang feng Apiaceae Root Stewed as a soup Medicine 0.7165 NJB111
Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr. Ha pa wan Phyllanthaceae Tender stem and leaf Pickled Vegetable 0.6850 NJB059
Scleromitrion diffusum (Willd.) R. J. Wang Ya ling o Rubiaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2677 NJB087
Senegalia pennata (L.) Maslin Song bai Fabaceae Tender stem and leaf Pan-fried with eggs Vegetable 0.7008 NJB074
Senna tora (L.) Roxb. Ya la meng nan Fabaceae Seed Infused as tea Medicine 0.3386 NJB131
Sigesbeckia orientalis L. Ya men gong Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4252 NJB174
Smilax china L. Ya nan nen Smilacaceae Root; tender stem and leaf Stewed as a soup or steamed Vegetable; food substitute 0.3465 NJB085
Solanum americanum Miller Pa dian lang Solanaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.7717 NJB057
Solanum torvum Swartz Hao ya tie Solanaceae Fruit Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4882 NJB061
Solanum violaceum Ortega Pa li Solanaceae Fruit Stir-fried Vegetable 0.4724 NJB012
Solanum lyratum Thunb. Ma wang fa Solanaceae Tender stem and leaf Stewed Vegetable 0.3622 NJB089
Solanum spirale Roxb. Ma wang Solanaceae Tender stem and leaf Stir-fried Vegetable 0.3543 NJB067
Sonchus oleraceus L. Pa yang Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.4252 NJB134
Spondias pinnata (L. F.) Kurz Guo ma ge Anacardiaceae Fruit; tender stem and leaf Consumed with chili sauce Vegetable; snack 0.6535 NJB006
Stemona japonica (Blume) Miq. Nan guang Stemonaceae Root Prepared as a soup Vegetable; medicine 0.4409 NJB090
Stemona tuberosa Lour. Ya nan guang Stemonaceae Root Prepared as a soup Vegetable; medicine 0.4331 NJB102
Talinum paniculatum (Jacq.) Gaertn. Huo na ti xing Portulacaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Tea substitute; medicine 0.3071 NJB171
Tamarindus indica L. Ma hang Fabaceae Fruit Consumed fresh or used as seasoning Snack 0.6220 NJB167
Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz. Nan mo dan Asteraceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable; medicine 0.6929 NJB152
Toona sinensis (A. Juss.) Roem. Mai yong Meliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.5197 NJB063
Toxicodendron succedaneum (L.) Kuntze Mai xi Anacardiaceae Fruit Oil-extracted and then used for stewing chicken Medicine 0.5118 NJB183
Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F. A. Barkley Mai ha wan Anacardiaceae Fruit Oil-extracted and then used for stewing chicken Medicine 0.5512 NJB153
Trevesia palmata (Roxb.) Vis. Dang ao Araliaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6142 NJB013
Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim. Ma huai hong Cucurbitaceae Fruit Cooked as a soup Medicine 0.2677 NJB116
Trifolium repens L. Ya pa wan Fabaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.0787 NJB086
Ulmus pumila L. Mai guo Ulmaceae Fruit Consumed after steaming or boiling Vegetable 0.4331 NJB188
Urtica fissa E. Pritz. Nan fan Urticaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3701 NJB178
Urtica mairei H. Lév. Nan fan Urticaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.2598 NJB105
Verbena officinalis L. Ya hang yan Verbenaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.6850 NJB143
Viola philippica Cav. Pa wan ding Violaceae Tender stem and leaf Blanched and then stir-fried Vegetable 0.3543 NJB194
Xanthium strumarium L. Ya xi wen Asteraceae Fruit Decoction prepared Oil substitute 0.2598 NJB094
Zanthoxylum armatum DC. Guo gan Rutaceae Fruit; tender stem and leaf Prepared as a soup Spice 0.6772 NJB080
Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim. Ma xian Rutaceae Fruit Stewed as a soup or stir-fried Vegetable 0.4409 NJB123
Zanthoxylum nitidum (Roxb.) DC. Hei nan huo Rutaceae Root Stir-fried with pork Medicine 0.3543 NJB138
Zizania latifolia (Griseb.) Turcz. ex Stapf Ti pao Poaceae Tender stem Stir-fried with pork Vegetable 0.5276 NJB115

Results

Diversity and taxonomic composition of wild edible plants

Statistical analysis of wild edible plants collected and utilized in Bingmen and Moka villages revealed a total of 177 species across 64 angiosperm families (Fig. 3). These plants were taxonomically diverse, with the most represented families being Asteraceae, comprising 17 species. Lamiaceae followed with 11 species, while Polygonaceae with 9 species. Liliaceae, Apiaceae, and Fabaceae, each contributed 8, while Poaceae, and Amaranthacea, each with 7 species. Rosaceae, Moraceae, and Solanaceae, each with 6 species, while Anacardiaceae contributed 5. Additional notable families included Araceae, Phyllanthaceae, each contributed 4. The remaining 67 species belonged to various other families such as Theaceae, Stemonaceae, Smilacaceae, Simaroubaceae, Saururaceae, Primulaceae, Portulacaceae, Pontederiaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Piperaceae. This broad taxonomic distribution indicates a high diversity of wild edible plant resources among the Dai people, which may be associated with the region’s environmental and climatic conditions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Diversity of wild edible plants

From an ecological perspective (Fig. 3), herbaceous plants dominate, accounting for 63.84% of species, followed by trees (19.77%), shrubs (10.17%), and vines (6.21%). The prominence of herbs and trees may be attributed to the accessibility and regeneration capacity, which are consistent with the subsistence-oriented use patterns reported by the Dai people. Tree-derived parts, such as fruits and young leaves, also served as important food sources. The lower representation of vines suggested they play a more supplementary dietary role.

As shown in Fig. 3, the leaves (103 species) and stems (99 species) were most commonly consumed, far exceeding fruits (37 species) and roots (29 species). Additionally, the edible parts of a few plants included flowers (17 species) and shoots (6 species). This pattern reflects a preference for vegetative plant parts over reproductive structures and is consistent with detailed knowledge of edible plant components reported by community members.

In terms of consumption types (Fig. 3), wild plants served various roles in local food systems. The majority were used as vegetables (119 species, 67.23%), underlining their significance in daily nutrition and dietary diversity. 52 species (29.38%) had medicinal uses, indicating their role in traditional Chinese medicine. 19 species (10.73%) were consumed as snacks, reflecting their cultural importance in traditional food practices. Additionally, 10 species (5.65%) were employed as herbs and spices, supporting food therapy and flavor enhancement. A smaller number served as food substitutes (7 species, 3.95%) and tea substitutes (5 species, 2.82%), revealing their function in periods of scarcity or specific cultural contexts. Collectively, these patterns indicate a selective strategy favoring renewable vegetative parts, suggesting an embedded ecological rationale that balances dietary needs with sustainable harvesting, rather than opportunistic exploitation of reproductive structures.

Ecological drivers of wild edible plants selection and management

According to statistical data (Fig. 4), the collection of wild edible plants by the Dai people was distributed across all four seasons, with notable variation in species richness. The highest number of species was collected in Spring (123 species, 69.49%), coinciding with the initial germination phase of many plants, during which their nutritional and edible value is high, indicating it as the peak harvesting season. Summer follows closely with 78 species (44.07%). Autumn yields a comparatively smaller number (52 species, 29.38%), likely due to climatic changes and the end of the plant growth cycle. Winter had the lowest yield (17 species, 9.60%), as low temperatures lead many plants into dormancy, limiting their availability. Additionally, five species were harvested year-round, reflecting ecological adaptability and continuous nutritional value. Overall, the seasonal variation in plant collection aligns with phenological patterns and highlights the Dai community’s deep ecological knowledge. This seasonal harvesting pattern closely follows local phenological cycles, indicating that ecological factors such as plant growth stages and climatic conditions play a central role in shaping collection practices.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The harvest time of wild edible plants

Regarding the distribution of transplanted wild edible plants (Fig. 5), wild edible plants mainly occur in three types of environments: mountainous regions, homegardens, and ricefields. Among these, homegardens contribute the highest number (50 species), suggesting that domesticated or semi-wild species often thrive near residential areas, benefiting from intentional or incidental management. Mountainous regions accounted for 9 species, emphasizing their importance for naturally occurring wild flora. In contrast, only four species were collected from ricefields, likely due to competition with intensive agricultural land use. These patterns highlight differences among habitat types in terms of wild edible plant occurrence and management. In terms of cultivation status, 171 species were collected in the wild, indicating that natural ecosystems remained the primary source of edible plant resources. Eight species have become escaped and were semi-wild. However, 66 species have been brought under artificial cultivation, reflecting efforts to ensure year-round availability and sustainable harvesting. Economically, 99 species were sold in local markets, underscoring their commercial value and market demand. Conversely, 78 species were not marketed and were likely used for subsistence purposes or have untapped economic potential. Collectively, these findings illustrated the ecological versatility and socioeconomic significance of wild edible plants within the Dai community (Fig. 5). The predominance of homegarden and minimally managed environments highlights an intermediate management strategy between wild collection and cultivation, which occur in contexts characterized by ecological constraints and ongoing land-use change.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Different management of wild edible plants

Management practices for wild edible plants included weeding, irrigating, pruning, application of farmyard manure, and, in some cases, no intervention (Fig. 6). Among the 177 documented species, weeding was the most common practice (41 species, 23.16%), reflecting efforts to maintain optimal growth conditions by reducing competition. Irrigating was applied to 30 species (16.95%), suggesting moderate water dependency in certain plants. Pruning is relatively uncommon (8 species, 4.52%), while 11 species (6.21%) benefited from the application of organic fertilizers, indicating traditional knowledge of enhancing plant productivity. Notably, 19 species (10.73%) required no additional management, implying resilience and natural adaptability. These varied management strategies reflected a nuanced understanding of ecological regulation and sustainable utilization embedded in traditional Dai agricultural practices.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Management measures for wild edible plants

Intergenerational variation in traditional ecological knowledge (TEK)

Statistical results show that elderly participants (≥ 60 years) identified markedly more species, recalled a wider range of uses, and reported more extensive foraging experience than middle-aged and younger participants. On average, the elderly group identified 156 species, compared with 88 species in the middle-aged group (40–59 years) and 29 species in the younger group (≤ 39 years). A similar pattern was observed in the selection or preference for wild edible plants: plants with distinctive flavors, seasonal significance, or combined medicinal and dietary functions showed consistently more popular among the elderly. Younger participants not only recognized fewer species but also demonstrated limited understanding of ecological distribution, seasonal collection schedules, and traditional processing techniques. Most (62%) were familiar only with common leafy vegetables or the few wild species occasionally available in markets. Moreover, 74% of elderly participants accurately described prohibited harvesting periods, ritual-related restrictions, and sustainable collection practices, whereas the proportions declined to 39% in the middle-aged group and 11% in the young group, indicating a weakening of ecological management knowledge (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The management of natural resources by the Dai people. (a)-(d). Religious or ritual management practices; (e)-(f). Community management practices

Generational differences were also evident in actual foraging behaviors and dietary preferences. While 82% of elderly participants reported foraging annually, participation declined sharply among the young, only 19% of whom engaged in foraging, a decline largely attributed to outmigration for work, the convenience of market-available vegetables, and shifting taste preferences. Younger participants preferred mild-flavored plants requiring minimal preparation, whereas the elderly expressed stronger attachment to traditional wild vegetables with bitter, sour, or aromatic flavors, as well as seasonal fruits. Elderly respondents further exhibited clear recall of the uses and collection timing of species with characteristic bitterness, distinctive aromas, or seasonal availability. They liked to plant their favorite vegetables in the ricefields near the house, and even 98% of local people reported that chemical fertilizers inhibit fern growth and cause leaf spotting, making them unsuitable for collection or sale. Instead, natural farmyard manure or no fertilizer at all was preferred to support healthy plant development (Fig. 8). In contrast, more than half of younger participants reported being “unfamiliar” or having “never heard” of these species. Knowledge transmission pathways have similarly contracted: 68% of elderly participants reported taking their children to forage, whereas only 23% of young respondents had ever gone foraging with elders. Many young participants had rarely accompanied older relatives to learn foraging skills, and several traditional plant names were forgotten or replaced by common Chinese names. Overall, these results indicate clear generational differences in traditional ecological knowledge, with younger cohorts exhibiting substantially reduced species recognition, ecological understanding, and practical engagement, providing empirical evidence of generational differences in traditional ecological knowledge that are associated with socio-economic change.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The management of wild edible plants from different perspectives in ricefields by the Dai people. (a)-(c). Front view; (d). Left view; (e). Right view

Comparison of WEPs between Dai people and other groups

A comparative analysis of wild edible plants (WEPs) used by the Dai people in the Lujiangba area and those reported for other ethnic groups and regions in China showed generally low to moderate levels of similarity (Table 4). The Jaccard similarity index (JI) values ranged from 2.27 to 13.33, indicating limited overlap in species composition among different regions and ethnic groups.

Table 4.

Jaccard similarity index (JI) for Dai people and other groups

Study area Indices JI References
A B C
Fangchenggang 177 163 38 12.58 [8]
Laifeng County 177 163 40 13.33 [38]
Dulongjiang Township 177 148 25 8.33 [42]
Four counties (Yuanyang, Lüchun, Honghe, and Jinping) 177 224 39 10.77 [43]
Lijiang area 177 139 7 2.27 [44]
Daur minority area in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang 177 52 6 2.69 [45]
Diqing Prefecture 177 168 20 6.15 [46]

The highest similarity values were observed for Laifeng County (JI = 13.33) and Fangchenggang (JI = 12.58). These areas share comparable subtropical climatic conditions and vegetation types, which may contribute to partial overlap in available edible plant resources. However, even in these regions, the number of shared species remained limited, with only 38 to 40 species in common, suggesting that local selection and use of WEPs are not determined solely by ecological similarity.

Moderate similarity values were recorded for the four counties of Yuanyang, Lüchun, Honghe, and Jinping (JI = 10.77) and for Dulongjiang Township (JI = 8.33). Although these areas are geographically closer to the study site and characterized by similar mountainous environments, the overlap in WEPs was still relatively low. This indicates that differences in cultural traditions, dietary practices, and knowledge transmission among ethnic groups contribute to distinct patterns of WEPs utilization.

In contrast, very low similarity values were observed for the Lijiang area (JI = 2.27), the Daur minority areas of Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang (JI = 2.69), and the Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (JI = 6.15). These regions differ markedly from the Lujiangba area in terms of climate, altitude, vegetation, and dominant subsistence systems, which limits the range of shared edible plant species. Differences in food culture and livelihood strategies further reduce overlap in WEPs use.

Overall, the number of shared species between the Dai people and other ethnic groups ranged from 6 to 40, reflecting substantial variation in WEPs composition across regions. Several species recorded in the Dai community were absent from previous ethnobotanical studies conducted in other parts of China, suggesting the presence of locally specific or previously underreported uses. These findings indicate that WEPs utilization in China exhibits clear regional and cultural differentiation shaped by both environmental conditions and culturally embedded knowledge systems.

Discussion

Cultural and ecological values of wild edible plants

Through long term adaptation to the hot and dry river valley environment, the Dai people of the Lujiangba area a locally distinctive pattern of wild edible plant use, characterized mainly by fresh aroma, pungency, mild bitterness, and subtle sourness. This system has taken shape through the combined influence of the local microclimate, vegetation composition, and established culinary practices, and it contributes to a sense of regional cultural identity.

Aromatic species such as Perilla frutescens, Mentha canadensis, Nepeta cataria, and Persicaria viscosa are locally regarded as plants that enhance flavor and are commonly used in cold dishes, soups, grilled foods, and rice noodle preparations. These plants are appreciated not only for their ability to add fragrance and freshness, but also for their perceived role in stimulating appetite and supporting digestion under hot climatic conditions. Bitter tasting plants including Senegalia pennata, Crassocephalum crepidioides, and Solanum americanum are culturally understood as having heat relieving and cooling properties. The local saying that bitterness nourishes the body reflects an adaptive understanding of dietary balance in high temperature environments and demonstrates how taste preferences are closely connected with ecological conditions and physiological needs [8]. Mildly sour or fermented tasting species such as Crateva unilocularis and Diplazium esculentum are commonly used to reduce greasiness and stimulate appetite, while pungent plants like Houttuynia cordata contribute to the characteristic aromatic profile of Dai cuisine.

Taken together, these practices suggest a locally coherent pattern of flavor use, in which aroma is associated with freshness, bitterness with bodily regulation, and sourness with appetite control. This flavor system differs markedly from those reported for several other ethnic groups in China [4246]. The observed differences are consistent with our first hypothesis that the Dai flavor system can be interpreted as a culturally specific form of ecological adaptation rather than a general pattern shared among neighboring groups. Comparative evidence from other areas of Yunnan and Guizhou further highlights this distinctiveness. While the Dulong, Hani, Naxi, Daur, Tujia, Zhuang, and Tibetan communities often emphasize the use of fruits or the combined use of leaves and stems [8, 38, 4246], the Dai show a clear preference for bitter, aromatic, and sour vegetative parts. This preference reflects both local environmental availability and dietary knowledge transmitted through cultural tradition [47].

An illustrative example of the cultural importance of wild edible plants is Buddleja officinalis, commonly known as the rice dyeing flower [48]. Among the Dai, its flowers are collected in early spring and used to color glutinous rice for festivals and religious offerings. The preparation of luofan or kaoluosuo enhances the visual and sensory qualities of food and also conveys symbolic meanings related to auspiciousness and Buddhist beliefs. The continued presence of this practice among neighboring ethnic groups suggests that certain elements of traditional ecological knowledge can circulate beyond a single cultural group while retaining local symbolic significance [49].

Therefore, several practices documented in this study, particularly the systematic use of bitter and aromatic vegetative parts, represent that have been underreported or rarely documented in previous regional studies. These findings indicate that ethnobotanical novelty does not arise only from the identification of new species or new uses, but also from analytical approaches that reveal how local communities organize, interpret, and transmit plant knowledge.

Despite the strengths of this study, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the research was conducted in a limited number of Dai settlements within the Lujiangba area. The findings therefore reflect locally specific ecological, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. Caution should be exercised when generalizing these results to other Dai communities or to other regions of Southwest China, where environmental conditions and cultural practices may be very different. Secondly, the data were collected within a defined time frame and do not capture long-term or cross-year dynamics in wild edible plant use. Seasonal availability, market integration, and ongoing environmental change may influence plant selection and management practices over time. Future longitudinal studies are needed to assess temporal trends.

Traditional ecological knowledge and conservation of wild edible plants

Our results indicate that the Dai community in the Lujiangba area has developed a relatively coherent and experience-based body of traditional ecological knowledge for the conservation and management of wild edible plants, incorporating both in situ and ex situ strategies. In situ conservation practices include selective harvesting, seasonal restrictions, protection of culturally significant sites, and ritual or religious regulations [50]. Elder participants described prohibitions on collecting certain vine shoots and fruits during specific growth stages, as well as the deliberate protection of plants growing near forest margins and water bodies due to religious beliefs and feng shui concepts, particularly those associated with Ficus species [51]. These culturally embedded norms can function as informal regulatory mechanisms that help control harvesting intensity and spatial distribution, thereby potentially contributing to the persistence of local plant resources.

Such practices are consistent with observations from other Dai communities in Yunnan [52], suggesting that systematic plant management knowledge has emerged through prolonged interaction with local ecosystems (Fig. 7). From an environmental perspective, these in situ practices contribute to the maintenance of habitat stability and local biodiversity in the hot and dry river valley environment, which is characterized by fragile ecosystems and high climatic sensitivity. By aligning harvesting activities with plant phenology and habitat characteristics, these practices may enhance the resilience of wild plant populations under increasing environmental variability. These findings are consistent with our second hypothesis (H2), indicating that ecological factors such as phenology, habitat type, and land use systems play a central role in shaping plant selection and management strategies.

Ex situ conservation is primarily reflected in the domestication and cultivation of wild edible plants in household gardens and areas surrounding villages [53]. As shown in Table 3, species with high relative frequency of citation values, including Diplazium esculentum, Elsholtzia kachinensis, Lasia spinosa, and Buddleja officinalis, occupy an important position in the daily diet and cultural practices of the Dai community [11, 38]. In rice field systems, the Dai have developed a distinctive approach to managing wild edible plants such as Diplazium esculentum, Elsholtzia kachinensis, and Lasia spinosa (Fig. 8). Community members actively introduce high-value wild edible species, including bitter leafy vegetables, edible and medicinal vines, and trees, into household courtyards and small family gardens. This practice reduces pressure on surrounding natural habitats while ensuring stable and convenient access to important food resources throughout the year.

In terms of public health implications, these ex situ practices contribute to dietary diversity and nutritional security, particularly in a region exposed to seasonal food shortages and increasing market dependence. Many of the cultivated wild edible plants are traditionally valued for their bitter, aromatic, or mildly sour characteristics, which are locally associated with appetite regulation, digestive support, and bodily cooling under hot climatic conditions. The continued use of such plants may help buffer dietary monotony and support adaptive food strategies in the context of rising temperatures and changing food environments.

Taken together, the in situ and ex situ conservation measures observed in the Dai community of Lujiangba reflect the multifunctional role of traditional ecological knowledge in linking environmental stewardship with food systems and cultural continuity. However, rapid socio-economic change, shifting livelihood patterns, and the declining transmission of traditional knowledge are altering collection behaviors and weakening some customary management practices. This trend may have implications not only for the conservation of wild edible plant resources but also for future food security and community health. Therefore, integrating locally grounded knowledge systems with contemporary ecological monitoring and participatory management frameworks may represent an important approach to promoting the sustainable use of wild edible plants and safeguarding biocultural diversity in the study area [9, 54, 55].

Conservation strategies from the perspective of biocultural diversity

From a biocultural diversity perspective, the conservation of traditional ecological knowledge related to WEPs among the Dai requires attention not only to biological resources but also to cultural values, social institutions, and knowledge transmission pathways [56, 57]. The pronounced generational differences documented in this study provide evidence consistent with our third hypothesis (H3), indicating that traditional knowledge is undergoing accelerated transformation and partial erosion under contemporary socio-economic conditions.

It is essential to strengthen the systematic documentation and long-term monitoring of local knowledge [58]. Much of the knowledge on harvesting routes, plant identification cues, processing methods, and the cultural contexts of plants in festivals, religious practices, and therapeutic uses relies on oral transmission, which is highly vulnerable to intergenerational discontinuity [8]. Establishing community-participatory knowledge archives that include botanical data, folklore narratives, use classifications, phenological characteristics, and harvesting coordinates will provide a solid foundation for subsequent transmission and research. In addition, integrating local schools, village cultural centers, and ethnographic museums to promote education on local plant culture can extend knowledge transmission from family-based contexts to broader community, school, and societal structures.

It is necessary to promote the complementary integration of traditional knowledge and modern science to enhance the interpretability and adaptability of TEK in contemporary society [59, 60]. Scientific analysis of the main nutritional components, bioactive compounds, and ecological adaptation traits of WEPs can provide a more persuasive basis for traditional uses, thereby increasing recognition of TEK in modern food systems, health-focused diets, and industrial development [48]. Meanwhile, the introduction of plant ecology, sustainable harvesting assessment methods, and habitat conservation techniques can help communities adjust harvesting intensity, protect high-risk species, and establish ecologically sensitive areas, ensuring the sustainable renewal of resources [61].

To enhance the visibility of cultural practices and the spaces in which they are performed is necessary to strengthen the social vitality of knowledge [62]. Traditional festivals, religious rituals, ethnic culinary events, and craft exhibitions are important arenas for the active transmission of TEK [63, 64]. Encouraging communities to revive traditional practices such as cooking rice with Buddleja officinalis flowers, wild vegetable banquets, and forest pilgrimages during festivals can facilitate the relearning and reproduction of knowledge. In addition, developing ecotourism, ethnic cooking courses, and cultural creative products based on traditional plant knowledge can increase the cultural recognition of WEPs while providing economic incentives for local residents, creating a positive cycle linking knowledge conservation and livelihood improvement [65, 66].

To promote knowledge sharing and social collaboration across ethnic and regional boundaries is necessary [67]. This study shows that some culturally symbolic WEPs have gradually spread to surrounding groups, creating new opportunities for the continuation of TEK [49]. Guided by the concept of biocultural diversity, platforms for interethnic exchange should be strengthened, such as regional ethnobotanical conferences, cross-community plant workshops, and traditional food festivals. By sharing experiences, exchanging plant materials, and jointly engaging in resource conservation, broader cultural and ecological communities can be established, enhancing the resilience of knowledge systems [24, 68].

Therefore, through multi-dimensional strategies including systematic documentation, scientific integration, cultural reproduction, and regional collaboration, the continuity and adaptability of TEK associated with WEPs can be effectively strengthened, providing useful insights for future discussions on resource management and cultural heritage preservation.

Conclusion

The traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of wild edible plants (WEPs) among the Dai people in Lujiangba area demonstrates their rich cultural heritage and ecological adaptation strategies. A systematic analysis of genus and family distributions, plant habits, edible parts, food types, cultivation and harvesting methods, management practices, and seasonal collection patterns reveals that the Dai have developed a distinct system for utilizing wild plants during their long-term adaptation to the hot and dry valley environment. Most WEPs are herbaceous (63.84%), followed by trees (19.77%) and shrubs (10.17%). Leaves and stems are the primary edible parts, while vegetables and medicinal plants constitute the main food types. The majority of species (171) occur in the wild, most requiring no additional management, although some cultivated or escaped species necessitate weeding, watering, or fertilization. Harvesting is highly seasonal, peaking in spring, with some species extending into summer and autumn, and a few available year-round. Beyond their nutritional and medicinal roles, WEPs also carry cultural significance, serving as markers of individual identity, ethnic belonging, and regional heritage, such as Diplazium esculentum, Elsholtzia kachinensis, Lasia spinosa, and Buddleja officinalis.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Dai people in Lujiangba, Baoshan, Yunnan Province, China, for providing valuable information and knowledge about wild edible plants. We are grateful to the people from different departments of the Baoshan Administration of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve who assisted us in our fieldwork.

Abbreviations

RFC

Relative frequency of citation

TEK

Traditional ecological knowledge

WEPs

Wild edible plants

Author contributions

CLL conceived, organized, and supervised the study. XH, LLB, MMW, QYC, and CLX conducted the field surveys and literature review. XH and LLB performed the data analysis. XH drafted the manuscript, and CLL edited and revised it. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Baoshan Administration of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve (202305AF150121 & GBP-2022-01), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32370407 & W2523057).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants were asked for their free prior informed consent before interviews were conducted.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ma Y, Luo B, Zhu Q, Ma D, Wen Q, Feng J, et al. Changes in traditional ecological knowledge of forage plants in immigrant villages of Ningxia, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15:65. 10.1186/s13002-019-0333-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Si A. Patterns in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge: A case study from Arnhem land, Australia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:52. 10.1186/s13002-020-00403-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:1251–1262. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010%255B1251:ROTEKA%255D2.0.CO;2.
  • 4.Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V. Reinterpreting change in traditional ecological knowledge. Hum Ecol. 2013;41:643–7. 10.1007/s10745-013-9577-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Setalaphruk C, Price LL. Children’s traditional ecological knowledge of wild food resources: A case study in a rural village in northeast Thailand. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:33. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He J, Peng L, Li W, Luo J, Li Q, Zeng H, et al. Traditional knowledge of edible plants used as flavoring for fish-grilling in southeast Guizhou, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022;18:19. 10.1186/s13002-022-00519-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Khan AH, Adil M, Aziz MA, Sõukand R, Pieroni A. Traditional foraging for ecological transition? Wild food ethnobotany among three ethnic groups in the highlands of the eastern Hindukush, north Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:9. 10.1186/s13002-023-00581-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu SC, Huang X, Bin Z, Yu B, Lu Z, Hu R, et al. Wild edible plants and their cultural significance among the Zhuang ethnic group in Fangchenggang, Guangxi, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:52. 10.1186/s13002-023-00623-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tadesse D, Masresha G, Lulekal E, Alemu A. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in Metema and Quara districts, northwestern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2025;21:7. 10.1186/s13002-025-00761-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Samkaria S, Kumari P. Wild edible flowers of Indian Himalayan region, their traditional uses and potential health benefits: A way forward for food and nutritional security. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2025;80:60. 10.1007/s11130-025-01302-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fang Q, Cheng Z, Zhang R, Luo B, Long CL. Wild edible plants of the Yao people in Jianghua, China: Plant-associated traditional knowledge and practice vital for food security and ecosystem service. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:80. 10.1186/s13002-024-00724-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma A, Wagh VV. From forests to tables: Wild edible plants’ contribution to ethnomedicine and nutrition in Madhya Pradesh, India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2025;72:4205–39. 10.1007/s10722-024-02206-w. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gillani SW, Ahmad M, Manzoor M, Waheed M, Iqbal Z, Ullah R, et al. The nexus between ecology of foraging and food security: Cross-cultural perceptions of wild food plants in Kashmir Himalaya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:77. 10.1186/s13002-024-00721-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alrhmoun M, Sulaiman N, Pieroni A. Phylogenetic perspectives and ethnobotanical insights on wild edible plants of the Mediterranean, middle east, and north Africa. Foods. 2025;14:465. 10.3390/foods14030465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Litskas VD, Chrysargyris A, Tzortzakis N, Stavrinides MC, Petropoulos SA. Can the commercial cultivation of wild edible species contribute to sustainable food production? A case study of golden thistle (Scolymus hispanicus L). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2025;30:446–61. 10.1007/s11367-024-02418-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oluoch WA, Borgemeister C, de Deus Vidal Junior J, Fremout T, Gaisberger H, Whitney C, et al. Predicted changes in distribution and richness of wild edible plants under climate change scenarios in northwestern Kenya. Reg Environ Change. 2024;24:11. 10.1007/s10113-023-02175-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Awoke A, Siyum Y, Gudesho G, Akmel F, Abate KS. Ethnobotanical study of wild and semi-wild edible plants in Yeki district, Sheka zone, southwest Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2025;21:54. 10.1186/s13002-025-00810-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Catarino L, Romeiras MM, Fernandes Â. Food from the wild—roles and values of wild edible plants and fungi. Foods. 2024;13:818. 10.3390/foods13060818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clemente-Villalba J, Burló F, Hernández F, Carbonell-Barrachina ÁA. Potential interest of Oxalis pes-caprae L., a wild edible plant, for the food and pharmaceutical industries. Foods. 2024;13:858. 10.3390/foods13060858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen S, Qian J, Ren J. Ethnoveterinary plant remedies used by nu people in NW Yunnan of China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:24. 10.1186/1746-4269-6-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheng Z, Luo B, Fang Q, Long C. Ethnobotanical study on plants used for traditional beekeeping by Dulong people in Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:61. 10.1186/s13002-020-00414-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang R, Herrera M, Xu W, Zhang P, Moreno JP, Colinas C, et al. Ethnomycological study on wild mushrooms in Pu’er Prefecture, southwest Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022;18:55. 10.1186/s13002-022-00551-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang H, Chiou S. Study on the sustainable development of human settlement space environment in traditional villages. Sustain Multidisciplinary Digit Publishing Inst. 2019;11:4186. 10.3390/su11154186. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cao Y, Li R, Zhou S, Song L, Quan R, Hu H. Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants used by three trans-boundary ethnic groups in Jiangcheng County, Pu’er, southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:66. 10.1186/s13002-020-00420-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cheng Z, Lin S, Wu Z, Lin C, Zhang Q, Xu C, et al. Study on medicinal food plants in the Gaoligongshan Biosphere Reserve, the richest biocultural diversity center in China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:10. 10.1186/s13002-023-00638-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang F, Sun T, Yu S, Liu C, Cheng Z, Xia J, et al. Ethnobotanical studies on rice landraces under on-farm conservation in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan province, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:45. 10.1186/s13002-024-00683-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang C, Chongsuvivatwong V, Keawpradub N, Lin Y. Analysis of prescription database extracted from standard textbooks of traditional Dai medicine. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:34. 10.1186/1746-4269-8-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang J, Pei S, Long C. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Lisu people in Nujiang, northwest Yunnan, China. Econ Bot. 2004;58:S253–264. 10.1663/0013-0001(2004)58. [S253:AESOMP]2.0.CO;2. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng Z, Hu X, Lu X, Fang Q, Meng Y, Long CL. Medicinal plants and fungi traditionally used by Dulong people in northwest Yunnan, China. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:895129. 10.3389/fphar.2022.895129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xiao Y, Li Y, Duan H, Ren Z, Feng S, Jiang Z, et al. Invasion status and control measures for alien plants within the Gaoligong Mountains. Biodivers Sci. 2023;31:23011. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2023011. https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li MY, Wang L, Fan ZX, Shen CC. Tree-ring density inferred late summer temperature variability over the past three centuries in the Gaoligong Mountains, southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2015;422:57–64. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.01.003. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Z, Tang Z, Fang J. Altitudinal patterns of seed plant richness in the Gaoligong Mountains, south-east Tibet, China. Divers Distrib. 2007;13:845–54. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00335.x. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cao YH. A research on the flora of Nujiang dry-hot valley in Lujiangba of Yunnan. Plant Divers. 1993;15(4):339–45. https://journal.kib.ac.cn/EN/Y1993/V15/I04/1. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao Z, He L, Li G, Ma S, Cui M, Liu Y, et al. Partitioning beta diversity of dry and hot valley vegetation in the Nujiang river in southwest China. Front Ecol Evol. 2023;11:1199874. 10.3389/fevo.2023.1199874. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.The People’s Government of Lujiang Town, County L, Province Y. July (https://www.longyang.gov.cn). Accessed 2025.
  • 36.Scott MM, Carolan MS, Long MA. The role of wild food in fostering healthy, sustainable, and equitable food systems. Sustainability. 2024;16:9556. 10.3390/su16219556. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keating C, Rogers R, Unal R, Dryer D, Sousa-Poza A, Safford R, et al. Syst Syst Eng Eng Manag J. 2003;15:36–45. 10.1080/10429247.2003.11415214. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hou S, Huang P, Yao Z. Ethnobotany study on wild edible plants used by the Tujia ethnic group in Laifeng, southwest Hubei, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:1–32. 10.1186/s13002-024-00735-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chase MW, Christenhusz MJ, Fay MF, Byng JW, Judd WS, Soltis DE, Mabberley DJ, Sennikov AN, Soltis PS, Stevens PFAPGIV. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181(1):1–20. 10.1111/boj.12385. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Flora of China (https://www.iplant.cn). Accessed July 2025.
  • 41.World Flora Online. (https://www.worldfloraonline.org). Accessed July 2025.
  • 42.Cheng Z, Lu X, Lin F, Naeem A, Long CL. Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants used by Dulong people in northwestern Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022;18:3. 10.1186/s13002-022-00501-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Luo BS, Liu B, Zhang H, Zhang H, Li X, Ma L, et al. Wild edible plants collected by Hani from terraced rice paddy agroecosystem in Honghe prefecture, Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15:56. 10.1186/s13002-019-0336-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang L, Chai Z, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Wang Y. Ethnobotanical study of traditional edible plants used by the Naxi people during droughts. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:39. 10.1186/s13002-016-0113-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bi Y, Gao F, Guo J, Yao X, Wang A, Liu H, et al. An ethnobotanical survey on the medicinal and edible plants used by the Daur people in China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20:55. 10.1186/s13002-024-00695-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ju Y, Zhuo J, Liu B, Long CL. Eating from the wild: Diversity of wild edible plants used by Tibetans in Shangri-la region, Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:28. 10.1186/1746-4269-9-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alemu WK, Worku LA, Bachheti RK, Bachheti A, Engida AM. Exploring phytochemical profile, pharmaceutical activities, and medicinal and nutritional value of wild edible plants in Ethiopia. Int J Food Sci. 2024;2024(1):6408892. 10.1155/2024/6408892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang F, Liang N, Hussain N, Zhou X, Ismail M, Xie Q, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of chemical constituents from the flower buds of Buddleja officinalis. Nat Prod Res. 2022;36:3031–42. 10.1080/14786419.2021.1952577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huai H, Xu W, Wen G, Bai W. Comparison of the homegardens of eight cultural groups in Jinping county, southwest China. Econ Bot. 2011;65:345–55. 10.1007/s12231-011-9172-1. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu H, Xu Z, Xu Y, Wang J. Practice of conserving plant diversity through traditional beliefs: A case study in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Biodivers Conserv. 2002;11:705–13. 10.1023/A:1015532230442. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shi Y, Hu H, Xu Y, Liu A. An ethnobotanical study of the less known wild edible figs (genus Ficus) native to Xishuangbanna, southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:68. 10.1186/1746-4269-10-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Q, Cheng Z, Fan Y, Zhang D, Wang M, Zhang J, et al. Ethnobotanical study on edible flowers in Xishuangbanna, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:43. 10.1186/s13002-023-00608-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li W, Zhang Q, Fan Y, Cheng Z, Lu X, Luo B, et al. Traditional management of ancient Pu’er teagardens in Jingmai mountains in Yunnan of China, a designated globally important agricultural heritage systems site. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:26. 10.1186/s13002-023-00598-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hankiso M, Warkineh B, Asfaw Z, Debella A. Ethnobotany of wild edible plants in Soro district of Hadiya zone, southern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19:21. 10.1186/s13002-023-00588-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Benner J, Nielsen J, Lertzman K. Using traditional ecological knowledge to understand the diversity and abundance of culturally important trees. J Ethnobiol. 2021;41:209–28. 10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.209. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nemogá GR, Appasamy A, Romanow CA. Protecting indigenous and local knowledge through a biocultural diversity framework. J Environ Dev. 2022;31:223–52. 10.1177/10704965221104781. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lukawiecki J, Wall J, Young R, Gonet J, Azhdari G, Moola F. Operationalizing the biocultural perspective in conservation practice: A systematic review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy. 2022;136:369–76. 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.016. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tomasini S, Theilade I. Local ecological knowledge indicators for wild plant management: Autonomous local monitoring in Prespa, Albania. Ecol Indic. 2019;101:1064–76. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.076. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kimmerer RW. Searching for synergy: Integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. J Environ Stud Sci. 2012;2:317–23. 10.1007/s13412-012-0091-y. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Amprazis A, Papadopoulou P. Key competencies in education for sustainable development: A valuable framework for enhancing plant awareness. Plants People Planet. 2025;7:1195–211. 10.1002/ppp3.10625. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ladio AH, Lozada M. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: A case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodivers Conserv. 2004;13:1153–73. 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000018150.79156.50. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang Q, Zhang J, Xu C, Wu X, Long C. The diversity of edible flowers and its biocultural role in local food system in Dali. Southwest China Divers. 2025;17(1):70. 10.3390/d17010070. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Luo B, Liu Y, Liu B, Liu S, Zhang B, Zhang L, et al. Yao herbal medicinal market during the dragon boat festival in Jianghua county, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14:61. 10.1186/s13002-018-0260-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gu W, Hao X, Wang Z, Zhang J, Huang L, Pei S. Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants from the dragon boat festival herbal markets of Qianxinan, southwestern Guizhou, China. Plant Divers. 2020;42:427–33. 10.1016/j.pld.2020.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Martinez Trujillo YL, Orosco Ucamayta E. Valuation of the diversity of native plants and the cultural-archaeological richness as an integrative approach for a potential use in ecotourism in the Inter-Andean Valley of Cusco, southern Peru. Diversity. Volume 15. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2023. p. 760. 10.3390/d15060760.
  • 66.Blanco-Salas J, Gutiérrez-García L, Labrador-Moreno J, Ruiz-Téllez T. Wild plants potentially used in human food in the protected area Sierra Grande de Hornachos of Extremadura (Spain). Sustainability. 2019;11:456. 10.3390/su11020456. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Borelli T, Hunter D, Powell B, Ulian T, Mattana E, Termote C, et al. Born to eat wild: An integrated conservation approach to secure wild food plants for food security and nutrition. Plants. 2020;9:1299. 10.3390/plants9101299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ghorbani A, Langenberger G, Sauerborn J. A comparison of the wild food plant use knowledge of ethnic minorities in Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve, Yunnan, SW China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:17. 10.1186/1746-4269-8-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.


Articles from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES