ABSTRACT
Avibacterium paragallinarum causes infectious coryza in chickens, a condition that is prevalent worldwide and causes considerable losses for the poultry sector. However, the scarcity of information concerning the virulence factors of the bacterium and the underlying pathogenic mechanisms is largely due to the lack of effective and practical tools for genetic manipulation. Herein, the point mutation A294G was introduced in the gene pheS of Av. paragallinarum to establish a counterselectable marker AppheSm. The host strain harboring the gene AppheSm exhibited sensitivity to para-chlorophenylalanine at a minimal inhibitory concentration of 20 mM, supporting the potential application of AppheSm as a counterselectable marker in Av. paragallinarum. The feasibility of this strategy was evaluated by generating an ApglgB insertion mutant harboring the gene AppheSm, followed by the seamless integration of the exogenous gene FtlpxE into the ApglgB locus via the replacement of the previously inserted gene AppheSm. This two-step recombination strategy successfully allowed the expression of the integrated gene FtlpxE, as assessed by the removal of 1-phosphate groups from lipid A. In addition, the effectiveness of the pheSm system in Av. paragallinarum was further evaluated by generating marker-free ApcpsB and ApneuB mutants, which exhibited defects in polysaccharide synthesis and sensitivity to the host complement system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the potential application of AppheSm as a counterselectable marker in Av. Paragallinarum. Furthermore, the method developed herein is of tremendous importance as a tool for the genetic manipulation of this bacterium.
IMPORTANCE
Avibacterium paragallinarum is the etiological agent of infectious coryza, a significant respiratory ailment associated with growth inhibition and diminished egg production in poultry. Given the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, there is an imperative need for the development of genetically engineered vaccines; however, the lack of effective tools for genetic manipulation in Av. paragallinarum has limited the scope of related research. Herein, we investigated the employment of the gene pheSm as a counterselectable marker for the screening of marker-free mutants of Av. paragallinarum. We report the successful and precise deletion of multiple genes in Av. paragallinarum and an instance of the effective seamless integration of the exogenous gene lpxE using this method. This study presents a valuable genetic tool for investigating the virulence genes and associated mechanisms of pathogenicity of this bacterium, as well as aiding the development of genetically engineered vaccines.
KEYWORDS: Avibacterium paragallinarum, Pasteurellaceae, marker-free mutagenesis, counterselectable marker, pheS
INTRODUCTION
Avibacterium paragallinarum is a gram-negative bacterium that belongs to the family Pasteurellaceae and causes infectious coryza (IC), an acute respiratory disease that afflicts chickens (1). The clinical manifestations of IC include nasal congestion, sneezing, dyspnea, facial edema, lacrimation, and diarrhea. Despite widespread and intensive vaccination for the control of the disease, outbreaks of IC continue to persist globally as the vaccine strains often fail to provide cross-protection against the nonmatching field strains (2, 3), leading to considerable economic losses (1, 4).
The genome sequences of several strains of Av. paragallinarum, such as the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent strains 211 and JF4211, nontypical strains AP-2 and AG21-0333, and NAD-hemin-independent strain FARPER-174, have been previously reported (5–8). Further research on the virulence factors of Av. paragallinarum is of great importance due to the complexity of its genome and the limited knowledge of the pathogenesis of IC. Capsular polysaccharides (CPS), pilin protein, repeats-in-toxin toxins, membrane vesicles, and phosphorylcholine have been previously proposed as factors associated with the virulence of Av. paragallinarum (9–13). The study of virulence factors often employs gene editing, which is a vital method for the engineering of bacterial cells and frequently utilizes homologous recombination–based techniques, such as gene knockout, knockin, and allelic exchange (14). Instances of generation of mutant strains via the employment of gene-editing techniques include the introduction of suicide plasmids in Riemerella anatipestifer ATCC11845 via conjugation (15), the introduction of a defective thy gene encoding a thymidylate synthase in Glaesserella parasuis via natural transformation (16), and the generation of a mutant strain of Av. paragallinarum by employing the TargeTron gene knockout system (9). The generation of mutant strains via resistance marker-free mutation has hitherto been accomplished in bacteria of the family Pasteurellaceae, exemplified by Pasteurella multocida and R. anatipestifer (17, 18). However, mutant strains of Av. paragallinarum have only been generated based on resistance markers or the introduction of additional intron sequences (9, 19). The disadvantages of such an approach include the retention of the marker on the bacterial genome, which has been previously observed to exert polar effects on distal genes of the mutant operon (20), and the inability to utilize marker-containing mutant strains for the development of vaccines due to potential adverse effects (21). These drawbacks underscore the need to investigate novel gene-editing techniques and to develop simple and efficient gene-manipulation tools for generating marker-free mutants of Av. Paragallinarum, thereby facilitating research of its virulence genes and their functions.
A two-step strategy involving selection and counterselection has typically been employed for increasing the efficiency and rate of mutant generation. Counterselectable markers, which are different from positive-selection markers, are effective tools in genetic engineering as they allow selection for loss of genetic markers rather than their presence. Counterselectable markers, such as the genes rpsL, sacB, rdxA, and pheS, can be lethal to the host strain under certain conditions (22–24). The gene pheS, which encodes the β-subunit of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, is a suitable option for a counterselectable marker, as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases responsible for charging tRNAs with the same amino acid are typically conserved across species (25). The selection strategy is based on the sensitivity of Av. paragallinarum to para-chlorophenylalanine (p-Cl-Phe), whose incorporation into cellular proteins is lethal to the cells (25, 26). Therefore, this is a precise and efficient method that allows screening for genetic modifications without leaving any trace of foreign DNA. In particular, the gene pheS has been exploited for the efficient generation of marker-free mutants, facilitating the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenicity and virulence of several bacteria, including Streptococcus suis, R. anatipestifer, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (17, 21, 27, 28); however, an efficient counterselection system for Av. paragallinarum has not been developed to date.
The current study showcases the development of a unique and efficient system for allelic exchange that employs a counterselection strategy and is accomplished via two primary steps: first, the initial screening for mutants using erythromycin resistance (ErmR) as a marker, followed by the screening for unmarked mutants utilizing the gene AppheSm as a counterselectable marker. This approach was employed for achieving targeted knock-out of the genes ApglgB, ApneuB, and ApcpsB in Av. paragallinarum. The exogenous gene FtlpxE from Francisella tularensis encoding lipid A 1-phosphatase was successfully inserted into the ApglgB locus and found to be efficiently expressed and functional. This marks the first successful attempt at generating a marker-free deletion mutant of Av. paragallinarum and validates the feasibility of applying the counterselectable marker AppheSm, generated by introducing a point mutation in the gene AppheS, in this bacterium. Furthermore, this method provides a genetic tool for investigating genes associated with the virulence of Av. paragallinarum, facilitates the insertion of exogenous genes, and aids the development of genetically modified vaccines.
RESULTS
Sensitivity of Av. paragallinarum to p-Cl-Phe
Previous studies have demonstrated that bacteria containing a point mutation in the gene pheS may exhibit sensitivity to p-Cl-Phe (25, 26). Therefore, the gene pheS of Av. paragallinarum was first explored as a counterselectable marker, and multiple sequence alignment of the gene sequence and those of the corresponding genes from Escherichia coli, R. anatipestifer, P. multocida, and G. parasuis was carried out using the program Clustal X. The amino acid alanine at position 294 (A294) of ApPheS was found to be highly conserved across all the selected species (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, a point mutation (A294G) was introduced to generate the mutant gene AppheSm, which was cloned into the shuttle plasmid pSF118 to generate the plasmid pJSF01 (Fig. 1B). To validate the feasibility of employing AppheSm as a counterselectable marker, the plasmid pJSF01 was introduced into the Av. paragallinarum strain SC05 by electroporation to generate the strain JS01. The sensitivity of the strain JS01 to p-Cl-Phe was then assessed; heightened sensitivity and significant growth inhibition were observed with increasing concentrations of p-Cl-Phe, with total growth inhibition observed at a concentration of 20 mM (Fig. 1C). By contrast, the growth of the parental strain SC05 was not inhibited upon treatment with p-Cl-Phe at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM. Survival analysis also showed that at 20 mM p-Cl-Phe, the wild-type strain SC05 survived with more than 10⁴ colonies, whereas the AppheSm-carrying strain JS01 had no surviving colonies (Fig. 1D and E). Taken together, these results suggest that AppheSm can be employed as a counterselectable marker for Av. paragallinarum utilizing a p-Cl-Phe concentration of 20 mM.
Fig 1.
Construction of the AppheSm gene and validation of its p-Cl-Phe sensitivity in Av. paragallinarum. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of pheS sequences from E. coli, R. anatipestifer, P. multocida, G. parasuis, and Av. paragallinarum. Green boxes indicate conserved residues corresponding to alanine at position 294 (A294) of E. coli pheS. (B) Illustration of the shuttle plasmid pJSF01 containing the gene AppheSm. The figure was generated using SnapGene software (GSL Biotech, Chicago, IL, USA). (C) Susceptibility of the strains SC05 and JS01 to p-Cl-Phe at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM. Survival analysis of SC05 (D) and JS01 (E) at different p-Cl-Phe concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three independent experiments (*, **, and *** denote P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively).
Construction of a marker-free ApglgB mutant of Av. paragallinarum utilizing a two-step strategy
The strategy involves the insertion of the markers AppheSm and ErmR into the ApglgB locus via natural transformation, as illustrated in Fig. 2A. The plasmid pJSF02 containing the ApglgB-AppheSm knock-out cassette (Fig. 2B) was generated and employed for the first natural transformation of the strain SC05 followed by homologous recombination to generate the ApglgB insertion mutant (strain JS02); this mutant was cultivated on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with erythromycin to facilitate screening. Single colonies were subsequently selected for analysis via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primer pair P31/P32; a successful knock-out yielded an amplicon of 4,411 bp, and the positive control SC05 yielded an amplicon of 2,536 bp. A total of 30 colonies were analyzed, and representative results are presented in Fig. 2C. The ApglgB mutant was further confirmed by Southern blot (Fig. 2D and E; WT, wild-type strain SC05; G-PE, ApglgB::AppheSm-ErmR), and details are provided in the Methods and Materials section. The analysis allowed the identification of the strain JS02 containing an insertion of the markers AppheSm and ErmR at the ApglgB locus; this strain was subsequently employed for a second round of natural transformation.
Fig 2.
Insertion of the counter-selection marker AppheSm into the ApglgB locus of Av. paragallinarum via natural transformation and homologous recombination. (A) Schematic of the first-round natural transformation and subsequent homologous recombination for AppheSm cassette integration. (B) Structure of suicide plasmid pJSF02 carrying the ApglgB-AppheSm knock-out cassette, which includes the genes AppheSm and ErmR, together with the upstream and downstream homology arms of ApglgB. (C) Colony PCR analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis of transformant strain JS02 generated via homologous recombination. Lane M: DL5000 DNA marker. Lanes 1–9: Amplicons (4,411 bp) obtained via colony PCR from the JS02 transformants using the primer pair P31/P32. Lane 10: Amplicon (2,536 bp) obtained from the wild-type strain SC05 (control). (D) Southern blot of KpnI-digested genomic DNA from the ApglgB insertion mutant with the AppheSm cassette. Lanes: M, DIG-labeled marker; WT, wild-type strain SC05; G-PE, ApglgB::AppheSm-ErmR. (E) Genomic organization adjacent to ApglgB and distribution of restriction sites for Southern blot analysis. WT, wild-type strain SC05; G-PE: JS02, glgB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR.
In order to achieve the removal of resistance markers from the mutant strain, a cassette containing the ApglgB locus with an insertion of the gene FtlpxE (ApglgB::FtlpxE) and lacking any resistance marker was constructed for counterselection. The insertion mutant was identified by screening colonies obtained on LB agar plates containing 20 mM p-Cl-Phe (Fig. 3A). Toward this end, the plasmid pJSF05 (Fig. 3B) containing the ApglgB::FtlpxE-markerless knock-in cassette was employed for the natural transformation of the strain JS02 to allow the second recombination event. PCR analysis using the primer pair P31/P32 yielded an amplicon of 3,208 bp for single-colony transformants (strain JS05) compared with 4,411 bp otherwise, while the wild-type control SC05 yielded an amplicon of 2,536 bp, as mentioned previously. A total of 30 colonies were analyzed, and representative results are presented in Fig. 3C. Southern blot analysis was performed to further confirm the FtlpxE-integrated strain (Fig. 3E and F; G-PE, ApglgB::AppheSm-ErmR; G-E, ApglgB::FtlpxE). The efficiency of screening for the ApglgB mutant strain using the AppheSm system was then determined. The number of colonies of the transformants on LB plates lacking and containing 20 mM p-Cl-Phe was found to be approximately 103 and 3 × 10 CFU, respectively, corresponding to a survival rate and an estimated recombination efficiency of approximately 3.63% ± 3.23% and 58.57% ± 7.08%, respectively (Fig. 3D). The successful generation of the ApglgB::FtlpxE mutant (strain JS05) proves that the AppheSm system can be employed for achieving marker-free gene knock-in in Av. paragallinarum.
Fig 3.
Generation of a marker-free ApglgB mutant of Av. paragallinarum via the second round of natural transformation. (A) Schematic diagram of the second-round natural transformation for the genomic integration of FtlpxE. (B) Suicide plasmid pJSF05 containing the ApglgB::FtlpxE-markerless cassette that includes the gene FtlpxE as well as upstream and downstream homology arms of ApglgB. (C) Colony PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis of JS05 transformants obtained from the second natural transformation. Lane M: DL5000 DNA marker. Lanes 1–10: Amplicons obtained via colony PCR from the marker-free mutant strain JS05 (3,208 bp) or the strain JS02 (4,411 bp), respectively, using the primer pair P31/P32. The wild-type strain SC05 was employed as a control (line 11). (D) Survival and screening rates of marker-free ApglgB deletion transformants via the AppheSm system. Survival rate = (number of colonies growing on the LB agar plate containing p-Cl-Phe/total number of colonies growing on LB agar plate) × 100; Recombination rate = (number of positive colonies/total number of colonies growing on the LB agar plate containing p-Cl-Phe) × 100. (E) Southern blot analysis of NheI-digested genomic DNA from the ApglgB::FtlpxE insertion mutant. Lanes: M, DIG-labeled marker; WT, wild-type strain SC05; G-PE, ApglgB::AppheSm-ErmR; G-E, ApglgB::FtlpxE. (F) Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the FtlpxE integration strain for Southern blot analysis. WT, wild-type strain SC05; G-PE: JS02, ApglgB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR; G-E: JS05, ApglgB insertion by FtlpxE.
Integration of FtlpxE allows the effective removal of a phosphate group from lipid A in Av. paragallinarum
Lipid A, also known as endotoxin, is essential for the survival of almost all gram-negative bacteria and can induce inflammation as well as fever as an immune response in higher organisms (29). The lactone phosphatase FtLpxE from Francisella novicida is known to eliminate 1-phosphate groups from lipid A at the external surface of the inner membrane (30). Herein, samples of lipid A isolated from the wild-type (SC05) and ApglgB::AplpxE (JS05) strains of Av. paragallinarum were individually combined with a 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix. The resulting mixture was subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis in negative-ionization mode, as previously described (31). As shown in Fig. 4, two different lipid A structures are hereby identified in Av. paragallinarum SC05 (Fig. 4A). The unmodified lipid A with m/z 1825.66 was highly abundant (58.0%), while the other compound, with m/z 1948.68 and an abundance of 42.0%, was speculated to be an acetamide phosphate (pEtN)-modified derivative of lipid A based on its molecular weight. As anticipated, the expression of FtLpxE in the strain SC05 resulted in the production of a significant quantity of lipid A dephosphorylated at the 1-position (Fig. 4B). This yielded compounds with m/z values of 1,745.65 (abundance of 5.6%) and 1,868.68 (35.8%), corresponding to a decrease of 80 in the m/z values of the compounds lipid A and pEtN-modified lipid A, respectively. These results show that the integration of FtlpxE via the two-step homologous recombination strategy employed herein, and its subsequent expression of the gene, resulted in the loss of the phosphate group from a large population of lipid A molecules. This indicates that the marker AppheSm can be employed for achieving seamless integration of exogenous genes in Av. paragallinarum, with the integrated gene FtlpxE allowing an efficient modification of lipid A in this bacterium.
Fig 4.
MALDI-TOF MS analysis of lipid A extracted from Av. paragallinarum strains SC05 (A) and JS05 (B), with predicted structures of the detected [M–H]⁻ ions.
AppheSm-mediated insertion of tag sequence into target gene
To further demonstrate that the AppheSm system can introduce tag sequences into specific genes, ApompA was selected as the target gene for His-tag insertion. First, using the plasmid pJSF11, the AppheSm cassette with an antibiotic resistance marker was inserted at the 3′ end of the ApompA gene (Fig. 5A). Subsequently, the AppheSm cassette in the chromosome was replaced with the integration plasmid pJSF12 carrying ApompA-His-tag, resulting in a recombinant strain containing the His tag but lacking any antibiotic resistance marker (Fig. 5B). Western blot analysis of the recombinant strain revealed two bands at approximately 31 kDa and 25 kDa, corresponding to the precursor and the mature form of ApOmpA, respectively (Fig. 5C, lane 2). In contrast, no signal was detected in the wild-type strain due to the absence of the His tag (lane 1). These results indicate that the AppheSm system enables efficient introduction of tag sequences into target genes, thereby providing a useful tool for functional gene studies.
Fig 5.
Construction of an Av. paragallinarum strain expressing C-terminally His-tagged ApOmpA. (A) Schematic representation of the first round of natural transformation at the ApompA locus. (B) Illustration of homologous recombination for His-tag introduction during the second natural transformation at the ApompA locus. (C) Western blot analysis of the His-tagged ApompA strain. Lanes: M, marker; 1, wild-type strain SC05; 2, His-tagged ApompA strain; 3, positive control, ApOmpA with His-tag expressed and purified from E. coli.
Construction of marker-free ApcpsB and ApneuB mutants of Av. paragallinarum utilizing the AppheSm system
The seamless, successful, and effective integration of the exogenous gene FtlpxE in Av. paragallinarum using the counterselectable marker AppheSm has been confirmed herein. The efficacy of the pheSm system in Av. paragallinarum was further validated by carrying out a seamless knock-out of two genes ApcpsB and ApneuB, which are associated with polysaccharide synthesis. A successful knock-out of the genes ApcpsB and ApneuB via the two-step recombination approach was validated by PCR analysis, which revealed that the corresponding amplicons differed in size from those of the strain SC05 by approximately 500 bp each; the illustration of the procedure is presented in Fig. 6A and B. The plasmids pJSF03, pJSF04, pJSF06, and pJSF07 containing the ApcpsB::AppheSm, ApneuB::AppheSm, ApcpsB-marker-free, and ApneuB-marker-free knock-out cassettes, respectively, were employed for the generation of marker-free deletion mutants of ApcpsB and ApneuB.
Fig 6.
Generation and validation of marker-free ApcpsB and ApneuB mutants of Av. paragallinarum using a two-step recombination strategy (A) The first-round homologous recombination by natural transformation integrates the AppheSm cassette into the target gene locus. (B) The second homologous recombination, performed via a subsequent natural transformation, excises the AppheSm cassette to yield a marker-free mutant. (C) Colony PCR analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis for the verification of transformants. Lane M: DL5000 DNA marker. Lane 1: Strain JS03 (amplicon of size 3,908 bp). Lane 2: Strain JS06 (1,308 bp). Lane 3: Strain SC05 (1,849 bp). (D) Colony PCR analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis for the verification of transformants. Lane M: DL5000 DNA marker. Lane 1: Strain JS04 (amplicon of size 3,745 bp). Lane 2: Strain JS07 (1,134 bp). Lane 3: Strain SC05 (1,645 bp). (E) Southern blot analysis of EcoRI-digested genomic DNA from the ApcpsB markerless mutant. Lanes: M, DIG-labeled marker; WT, wild-type strain SC05; C-PE, ApcpsB::AppheSm-ErmR; C-MF, ApcpsB markerless mutant. (F) Southern blot analysis of NheI-digested genomic DNA from the ApneuB markerless mutant. Lanes: M, DIG-labeled marker; WT, wild-type strain SC05; N-PE, ApneuB::AppheSm-ErmR; N-MF, ApneuB markerless mutant. (G) Genomic structure of ApcpsB and distribution of restriction sites for Southern blot analysis. WT, wild-type strain SC05; C-PE: JS03, ApcpsB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR; C-MF: JS06, ApcpsB marker-free mutant. (H) Genomic structure of ApneuB and distribution of restriction sites for Southern blot analysis. WT, wild-type strain SC05; N-PE: JS04, ApneuB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR; N-MF: JS07, ApneuB marker-free mutant. (I) Survival rate and screening efficiency of transformants with marker-free deletion of ApcpsB generated using the AppheSm system. (J) Survival rate and screening efficiency of transformants harboring a marker-free deletion of ApneuB constructed via the AppheSm system. The formula for the rates of survival and recombination has been described in the legends to Fig. 3.
The ApcpsB mutant strain was generated by employing the plasmid pJSF03 (containing the ApcpsB::AppheSm knock-out cassette) for the first natural transformation of the strain SC05, followed by selection of the transformants on LB agar plates containing erythromycin and screening using colony PCR. An amplicon size of 3,908 bp (Fig. 6C, lane 1) reflected successful transformation to yield the mutant ApcpsB::AppheSm (strain JS03), which was subjected to sequencing analysis for further verification (data not shown). The genome of the strain JS03 carries the gene encoding ErmR, and its removal was accomplished via the second natural transformation of the strain JS03 with the plasmid pJSF06 containing the ApcpsB-marker-free knock-out cassette. The resulting transformants were cultured on LB agar plates supplemented with 20 mM p-Cl-Phe and subjected to colony PCR analysis, with fragment sizes of 1,308 and 1,849 bp corresponding to the mutant and wild-type strains, respectively (Fig. 6C. lanes 2 and 3). The mutant strain obtained (strain JS06) was subjected to sequencing and Southern blot analysis for further verification (Fig. 6E and G; C-PE, ApcpsB::AppheSm-ErmR; C-MF, ApcpsB markerless mutant). The ApneuB mutant strain was generated by employing the plasmid pJSF04 (containing the ApneuB::AppheSm knock-out cassette) for the first natural transformation of the strain SC05 and selection on LB agar plates containing erythromycin, as mentioned previously. The transformants were verified by colony PCR (yielding an amplicon size of 3,745 bp; Fig. 6D, lane 1) and subjected to sequencing analysis to yield the mutant ApneuB::AppheSm (strain JS04). Similar to the strain JS03, the strain JS04 also carries the gene encoding ErmR, whose removal was accomplished via the second natural transformation of the strain JS04 with the plasmid pJSF07 (containing ApneuB-marker-free knock-out cassette), selection of the transformants on LB agar plates supplemented with 20 mM p-Cl-Phe, and screening via colony PCR and sequencing; amplicons of sizes 1,134 and 1,645 bp were obtained from the mutant and wild-type strains, respectively (Fig. 6D lanes 2 and 3). The resulting mutant strain JS07 was subjected to sequencing and Southern blot analysis for verification (Fig. 6F and H; N-PE, ApneuB::AppheSm-ErmR; N-MF, ApneuB markerless mutant). A comparison of the numbers of bacterial colonies obtained on LB agar plates without and with 20 mM p-Cl-Phe (103 and 3 × 10 CFU, respectively) revealed that the efficiency of recombination at the ApcpsB locus using the AppheSm system was 70.11% ± 5.97%, while the survival rate was 3.44% ± 2.07% (Fig. 6I). The efficiency of recombination in the marker-free ApneuB mutant strains generated using the AppheSm system was 63.87% ± 7.05%, while the survival rate was 2.91% ± 2.05% (Fig. 6J). These results indicate that the counterselectable marker AppheSm can be effectively employed for the generation of seamless knock-out of multiple genes in Av. paragallinarum.
Phenotypic analysis of the ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains
The genes ApcpsB and ApneuB were predicted to encode mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase and N-acetylneuraminate synthase, respectively, and may play a role in the synthesis of lipooligosaccharides (LOS) or capsular polysaccharides (CPS) (Fig. 7A). The alterations in the content of LOS in the ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains with respect to that in the wild-type strain SC05 were detected by gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) followed by silver staining. As shown in Fig. 7B, the rate of migration of the LOS from these three strains is nearly identical, corresponding to molecular weights of approximately 15–18 kDa, indicating that the genes ApneuB and ApcpsB do not influence the glycoforms of LOS in Av. paragallinarum SC05. Due to the absence of monoclonal antibodies against CPS, CPS detection was not performed.
Fig 7.
Phenotypic characterization of ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains of Av. paragallinarum. (A) Schematic depicting the metabolic synthesis pathway of polysaccharides and the roles of the genes ApcpsB and ApneuB. (B) LOS profiles of the wild-type SC05 and ApcpsB as well as ApneuB mutant strains assessed using 15% SDS–PAGE. Lane M: Protein molecular weight marker. Lane 1: Strain SC05. Lane 2: ApcpsB mutant strain. Lane 3: ApneuB mutant strain. Survival of Av. paragallinarum strains in 90% chicken (C) and 30% porcine (D) sera. The survival percentage was calculated as the ratio of colonies in fresh serum to those in heat-treated serum. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three independent experiments (*, **, ***, and **** denote P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0001, respectively). (E) Scanning and transmission electron microscopy analysis of ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains. Red arrows exhibited wrinkling, collapsed, and lysed structures on the cell membrane.
The roles of ApneuB and ApcpsB in serum resistance were evaluated by assessing the sensitivity of the ApneuB and ApcpsB mutants, as well as the corresponding complemented strains, to 90% chicken or 30% porcine sera. The survival rate of the wild-type strain SC05 in the presence of 90% chicken serum was found to be 230.33% ± 10.01%, with the ApneuB mutant, ApneuB-complemented mutant, ApcpsB mutant, and ApcpsB-complemented mutant strains exhibiting survival rates of 142.67% ± 15.01%, 234.74% ± 11.36%, 86.54% ± 8.5%, and 225.84% ± 11.68%, respectively (Fig. 7C). These observations reveal that the sensitivity of the ApneuB mutant strain to chicken serum was significantly higher than that of the wild-type strain SC05 (P < 0.01), as was that of the ApcpsB mutant strain (P < 0.0001); however, the complementation of these mutant strains with the corresponding genes (ApneuB and ApcpsB, respectively) restored their serum-resistance phenotype.
As shown in Fig. 7D, the survival rate of the wild-type strain SC05 in the presence of 30% porcine serum was found to be 75.56% ± 9.16%, while those of the ApneuB mutant, ApneuB-complemented mutant, ApcpsB mutant, and ApcpsB-complemented mutant strains were found to be 61.59% ± 9.53%, 80.34% ± 8.73%, 36.58% ± 7.28%, and 79.51% ± 10.13%, respectively. Importantly, the sensitivity of the ApneuB mutant strain to porcine serum, unlike its sensitivity to chicken serum, was not significantly different from that of the wild-type strain SC05 (P > 0.05); however, the sensitivity of the ApcpsB mutant strain remained significantly different (P < 0.01). The complementation of these mutant strains with the corresponding genes (ApneuB and ApcpsB, respectively) effectively restored their serum-resistance phenotype. Furthermore, LOS extracted from complemented strains were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis; however, no obvious differences in LOS profiles were observed (Fig. S1). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses revealed that the ApcpsB and ApneuB deletion mutants exhibited more pronounced structural damage under the action of complement (Fig. 7E). These results demonstrate that both ApcpsB and ApneuB play roles in protecting Av. paragallinarum against complement-mediated killing.
Transcriptomic analysis revealed that, relative to the wild-type strain, the ApneuB mutant exhibited 93 upregulated and 33 downregulated genes, whereas the ApcpsB mutant displayed 33 upregulated and 48 downregulated genes (Fig. 8A). A total of 39 genes showed differential expression in both mutants (Fig. 8B). The transcriptome data further indicated that deletion of ApneuB or ApcpsB led to a marked reduction in the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) values for both genes, which can be attributed to the removal of several hundred base pairs from each locus, thereby reducing the number of mapped reads (Fig. 8C). This observation provides additional confirmation that the intended genetic edits were successfully introduced. The transcript level of ApneuB decreased 7.06-fold, while ApcpsB decreased 2.27-fold (Fig. 8D). In the ApneuB mutant, significantly upregulated genes included speF, OW731_R03130 (S6 family peptidase), OW731_R02520 (YcgL domain-containing protein), zevA, and potE, among which speF and potE are both involved in ornithine metabolism. Conversely, significantly downregulated genes included ApneuB, gmhB, ltnD, OW731_R12170 (Mu transposase C-terminal domain-containing protein), and OW731_R04105 (aromatic amino acid transporter), reflecting the altered transcriptional level of ApneuB (Fig. 8E). In the ApcpsB mutant, significantly upregulated genes included OW731_R03725 (Sel1 repeat family protein), OW731_09970 (class I S-adenosylmethionine-dependent DNA methyltransferase), speF, and OW731_R03720. Downregulated genes included OW731_R12165 (AAA family ATPase), OW731_R12170 (Mu transposase C-terminal domain-containing protein), OW731_R03475 (csrA), and manX, suggesting potential impacts on carbon source metabolism (Fig. 8F).
Fig 8.
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains of Av. paragallinarum. (A) Statistics of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ApneuB and ApcpsB mutant strains. (B) Shared DEGs between ApneuB and ApcpsB mutant strains. (C) The fragments per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads values (FPKM) of ApneuB and ApcpsB calculated from RNA-seq data. (D) Changes in transcript levels of ApneuB and ApcpsB genes in their respective mutant strains. Volcano plot analysis of differentially expressed genes in ApneuB (E) and ApcpsB (F) mutant strains.
In conclusion, we have developed an AppheSm-based genetic modification approach for Av. paragallinarum, with the overall workflow summarized in Fig. 9. This method provides a technical foundation for the investigation of virulence-associated genes and the development of vaccines for this pathogen.
Fig 9.
Schematic workflow for markerless Av. paragallinarum strain construction.
DISCUSSION
Despite the worldwide prevalence of IC caused by Av. paragallinarum, the pathogenesis of the disease remains poorly understood compared to that of diseases caused by other pathogenic bacteria, mainly due to the absence of effective and exhaustive tools for gene manipulation. Although the feasibility of applying several methods of constructing mutant strains has been demonstrated in Av. paragallinarum (9, 19, 32, 33), there remains a lack of effective tools for marker-free and scarless gene editing. To address this shortcoming, a counterselection method was additionally employed herein to develop a scarless gene-editing approach of higher efficacy. The feasibility of applying counterselection methods has been previously demonstrated in P. multocida and R. anatipestifer (34, 35), which are closely related to Av. paragallinarum, prompting us to investigate the potential application of AppheSm as a counterselectable marker in Av. paragallinarum. Toward this end, the growth of wild-type Av. paragallinarum in p-Cl-Phe was first assessed, given the inability of a majority of bacteria of the family Sphingomonadaceae to grow in the presence of 0.1 mM p-Cl-Phe; such bacteria are, therefore, not amenable to the employment of pheS as a counterselectable marker (36). Additionally, the host bacterium containing pheSm must be susceptible to p-Cl-Phe to enable successful counterselection. Previous studies have demonstrated that R. anatipestifer, P. multocida, and Lactococcus lactis are susceptible to p-Cl-Phe at concentrations of 13 mM (17), 20 mM (34), and 15 mM (37), respectively. The optimal concentration of p-Cl-Phe for performing counterselection in Av. paragallinarum was experimentally determined herein as 20 mM, indicating that the gene AppheSm confers relatively less sensitivity to p-Cl-Phe than other bacteria mentioned above, but can still be employed for screening. Subsequently, a two-step strategy for modifying target genes in Av. paragallinarum using the AppheSm system was devised herein.
Screening efficiency is an important consideration in the construction of mutant strains. While the screening efficiency is obviously influenced by the target gene involved, the hallmark of an ideal screening system is its ability to facilitate the efficient knock-out of multiple different genes. For example, screening efficiencies of 50% and 30% were obtained during the generation of mutants of L. lactis containing marker-free knock-out of the galactose operon and the gene aldB, respectively, using the pheSm counterselectable marker system (37). The efficiency of employing the pheSm system for the screening of glgB, hyaE, fur, and opa mutants of P. multocida was 50.0%, 39.6%, 31.3%, and 41.7%, respectively (34). These results indicate that the screening efficiency of the pheSm system typically exceeds 30%. In the current study, the efficiency of screening for the ApglgB mutant following the first step of recombination was nearly 100%, as the transformants were screened for the presence of the antibiotic resistance marker ErmR via selection on erythromycin-containing medium (Fig. 2C). Subsequently, a marker-free cassette was introduced into the ApglgB mutant via natural transformation to achieve a second round of homologous recombination, and transformants were subjected to counterselection in the presence of 20 mM p-Cl-Phe. This process resulted in the successful generation of the marker-free ApglgB::FtlpxE strain with a screening efficiency of 58.57% ± 4.78% (Fig. 3D). Additionally, the two-step strategy based on the AppheSm system was employed for generating marker-free ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains with screening efficiencies of 70.11% ± 5.97% (Fig. 6I) and 63.87% ± 7.05% (Fig. 6J), respectively. These results confirm the feasibility and efficiency of employing AppheSm as a counterselectable marker in Av. paragallinarum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the application of mutant alleles of AppheS as counterselectable markers for effective and efficient genetic engineering in Av. paragallinarum.
The AppheSm counterselectable marker system described herein not only facilitates seamless gene knock-out but also enables the direct insertion and expression of exogenous genes in Av. paragallinarum. As a proof of concept, the exogenous gene FtlpxE was seamlessly integrated into the genome of Av. paragallinarum using the AppheSm system. Following integration, the gene FtlpxE was effectively expressed, yielding a functional enzyme whose activity (the removal of a phosphate group from lipid A) was demonstrated herein. The AppheSm system, therefore, allows the excision of target genes and the insertion of specific exogenous genes into target loci without employing antibiotic resistance markers for screening following the second round of homologous recombination, thereby alleviating concerns over the emergence of antibiotic-resistant superbugs. The disaccharide backbone of lipid A is extensively preserved in the majority of bacterial species (38, 39) and is bonded with mono- or bi-phosphorylated cations at positions C-1 and C-4 (40). The toxicity of lipid A is determined by its structural characteristics, including the quantity and size of fatty acids, as well as the presence of phosphorylated polar functional groups such as phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) (41, 42). Considerable variations in the structure of lipid A are evident not only across different bacteria, but also within individual species. The lipid composition of gram-negative bacteria is frequently altered to enhance intracellular survival; an example is the structural modification of lipids via the incorporation of pEtN (43). Furthermore, these alterations aid the process of infection by allowing the bacteria to escape detection by the toll-like receptor 4, a key activator of the innate immune response (44). To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to analyze the composition of lipid A in Av. paragallinarum (Fig. 4). The analysis revealed the presence of two types of lipid A structures, one of which contains pEtN. The LpxE from F. novicida can dephosphorylate lipid A at the C-1 position (30). This activity was further confirmed by the partial dephosphorylation of lipid A observed in the mutant ApglgB::FtlpxE (Fig. 4B) but not the wild-type strain SC05. These findings provide evidence for the successful expression and functional activity of LpxE in the Av. paragallinarum strain SC05. Lipid A plays a crucial role in bacterial infections, and excessive activation of the immune system by this biomolecule can result in sepsis and fatal shock (45). The strain constructed herein harbors the exogenous gene FtlpxE integrated into the genome, which may potentially decrease the risk associated with such an activation and reduce the side effects of vaccines, although further experiments are warranted to confirm the same.
The present investigation additionally evaluated the phenotypic characteristics of the ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains. A previous study indicated that the acbEDGHCB and ccbEF1F2CB loci may contribute to CPS synthesis in Av. paragallinarum (46). Another study reported that the deletion of the genes acbD or ccbF1 significantly impacts CPS production (33); however, the association between the mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase CpsB and capsule formation remains to be elucidated. Due to the lack of appropriate antibody tools for CPS detection, we were unable to clearly assess the impact of ApcpsB on CPS biosynthesis. Nevertheless, the complement sensitivity results suggest that the loss of ApcpsB likely influences the synthesis of specific polysaccharides in Av. paragallinarum. Multiple studies have shown that the gene neuB encodes sialic acid synthase (47–50). One of three open reading frames from Campylobacter jejuni that exhibits highest similarity with NeuB sequences from E. coli has been discovered to play a role in the production of LOS (51). Furthermore, the genes mnaA, neuB, neuA, wecA, wzt, and wzm are known to be involved in the biosynthesis and translocation of the O-chain of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in Legionella pneumophila (52). These investigations indicate a role for neuB in the synthesis of LPS or LOS. However, sialic acid is generally located on the outermost surface of the core polysaccharides in LOS (53), and its absence may have little effect on the size of LOS. This may explain the lack of obvious differences in the size of LOS obtained from the ApneuB mutant of Av. paragallinarum compared to that from the wild-type strain SC05 (Fig. 7B).
Serum resistance is a virulence determinant in several species of the family Pasteurellaceae (54–56). Herein, statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed in the sensitivities of the wild-type, ApcpsB, and ApneuB mutants to both chicken and porcine sera (Fig. 7C and D). Interestingly, the survival rate of all the tested strains in the presence of chicken serum exceeded 100%, except for the ApcpsB mutant strain. This indicates that chicken serum fails to exert a lethal effect on Av. paragallinarum, highlighting the high pathogenicity of the bacterium, which renders the complement system of chicken ineffective in eliminating the pathogen. By contrast, the survival rate of the ApcpsB mutant strain in these settings was merely 86.54% ± 8.5%, suggesting that the expression of ApcpsB significantly contributes to the resistance of the pathogen against the host complement system. Furthermore, all the tested strains exhibited survival rates of below 100% in porcine serum; this observation suggests that the bactericidal potential of the mammalian complement system may be stronger than that of the avian ones, at least with respect to Av. paragallinarum. A possible reason is that the predominant immunoglobulin in poultry is IgY, which differs from mammalian IgG in that it cannot bind to the complement component C1q (57). Consequently, IgY is unable to initiate the classical complement pathway, which may explain the relatively lower antibacterial activity of avian serum. Moreover, since Av. paragallinarum occurs exclusively in poultry, it is plausible that this bacterium has evolved to withstand only a relatively weaker complement system.
The current study demonstrates the feasibility of employing the pheSm system in Av. paragallinarum and proposes a two-step strategy as an effective tool for gene editing (including gene knock-out and knock-in) in the bacterium. This study represents a significant advancement in demonstrating the potential application of AppheSm as a counterselectable marker in Av. paragallinarum. Furthermore, the method developed herein is crucial for facilitating genetic manipulation of this bacterium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. E. coli DH5α was cultured in LB medium or LB agar at 37°C. Unless otherwise indicated, Av. paragallinarum strains were cultured at 37°C in the presence of 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) in LB medium or LB agar supplemented with 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD; p-Cl-Phe (20 mM) was added to the LB agar for counterselection. The following antibiotics were employed at the indicated concentrations for screening transformants: ampicillin trihydrate (100 µg/mL) and gentamicin (30 µg/mL) for E. coli, and erythromycin (5 µg/mL), and gentamicin (18 µg/mL) for Av. paragallinarum.
TABLE 1.
Strains used in this studya
| Strain | Relevant characteristic(s) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| DH5α | F⁻, φ80d/lacZΔM15, Δ(lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17 | Laboratory collection |
| BL21 (DE3) | F⁻, ompT hsdSB (rB⁻, mB⁻) gal dcm (DE3) | Laboratory collection |
| SC05 | Av. paragallinarum clinical isolate | Laboratory collection |
| JS01 | SC05, containing pJSF01 with AppheSm gene, GmR | This study |
| JS02 | SC05, ΔApglgB, ApglgB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR | This study |
| JS03 | SC05, ΔApcpsB, ApcpsB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR | This study |
| JS04 | SC05, ApneuB, ApneuB disrupted by AppheSm and ErmR | This study |
| JS05 | SC05, ApglgB::FtlpxE, ApglgB insertion by FtlpxE | This study |
| JS06 | SC05, ApcpsB marker-free mutant | This study |
| JS07 | SC05, ApneuB marker-free mutant | This study |
| JS08 | JS06 containing pJSF08 with intact ApcpsB gene, GmR | This study |
| JS09 | JS07 containing pJSF09 with intact ApneuB gene, GmR | This study |
| JS10 | SC05, the AppheSm and ErmR cassettes were inserted immediately downstream of the stop codon of the ApompA gene. | This study |
| JS11 | SC05, insertion of a His-tag immediately upstream of the ApompA stop codon. | This study |
| JS12 | pJSF12 in BL21 (DE3), KanR | This study |
GmR: gentamicin resistance; ErmR: erythromycin resistance; KanR: kanamycin resistance.
TABLE 2.
Plasmids used in this studya
| Plasmid | Relevant characteristic(s) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| pUC19 | Expression vector, AmpR | Novagen |
| pUC19-pD70 ori | pD70 ori in pUC19 | This study |
| pUC19-Erm | Erythromycin resistance gene in pUC19 | This study |
| pSF118 | A shuttle plasmid containing pD70 ori and ColE1 ori sequences, GmR | This study |
| p34S-gm | Gm resistance cassette-carrying vector, GmR | (58) |
| pET-28b(+) | Expression vector, KanR | Novagen |
| pET-28b(+)-AppheSm | AppheSm gene in pET-28b(+), KanR | This study |
| pACYCduet-1 | Expression vector, CmR | Novagen |
| pACYCdue-1-lpxE | FtlpxE gene in pACYCdue-1 | This study |
| pJSF01 | Shuttle plasmid containing AppheSm gene in pSF118, GmR | This study |
| pJSF02 | Counterselectable cassette containing ErmR, AppheSm gene, the upstream and downstream sequences of ApglgB in pUC19, ErmR, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF03 | Counterselectable cassette containing ErmR, AppheSm gene, the upstream and downstream sequences of ApcpsB in pUC19, ErmR, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF04 | Counterselectable cassette containing ErmR, AppheSm gene, the upstream and downstream sequences of ApneuB in pUC19, ErmR, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF05 | Markerless cassette containing FtlpxE gene, the upstream and downstream sequences of ApglgB in pUC19, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF06 | Markerless cassette containing the upstream and downstream sequences of ApcpsB in pUC19, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF07 | Markerless cassette containing the upstream and downstream sequences of ApneuB in pUC19, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF08 | Complementary plasmid containing ApcpsB gene in pSF118, GmR | This study |
| pJSF09 | Complementary plasmid containing ApneuB gene in pSF118, GmR | This study |
| pJSF10 | Counterselectable cassette containing AppheSm and ErmR between the upstream and downstream arms flanking the stop codon of ApompA, ErmR, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF11 | Markerless cassette containing His-Tag sequence between the upstream and downstream arms flanking the stop codon of ApompA in pUC19; ErmR, AmpR | This study |
| pJSF12 | ApompA gene with C-terminal His-Tag in pET-28a(+), KanR | This study |
GmR: gentamicin resistance; AmpR: ampicillin resistance; ErmR: erythromycin resistance; CmR: chloramphenicol resistance; KanR: kanamycin resistance.
Bioinformatics analysis
Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X version 2.0 (59) and ESPript 3.0 (60). The amino acid sequences encoded by pheS from E. coli (NP416229.1), R. anatipestifer (WP004919587.1), P. multocida (WP005756547.1), G. parasuis (WP160405289.1), and Av. paragallinarum (WP035684599.1) were compared and analyzed.
Evaluation of sensitivity of Av. paragallinarum strains to p-Cl-Phe
To investigate the sensitivity of Av. paragallinarum to p-Cl-Phe, the first step is the construction of the shuttle vector. The primers used in this study are listed in Table S1. Based on a previous investigation of replicons from bacteria of the family Pasteurellaceae (61), the wild-type replicon pD70 ori (accession number: DQ125466.1) was synthesized and introduced into the plasmid pUC19 (62) via seamless cloning (ClonExpress MultiS One Step Cloning Kit, Vazyme, Nanjing, China), thereby generating pUC19-pD70. The fragment containing pD70 ori was amplified by PCR using the primers P1 and P2, and the E. coli replicons and gentamicin resistance marker were amplified from p34S-Gm (58) using the primers P3 and P4; a new shuttle vector, pSF118, was generated by the seamless ligation of these two fragments. Simultaneously, the gene AppheS harboring a point mutation (A294G) was synthesized and cloned into the multiple cloning site of pET-28b(+) to generate pET-28b(+)-AppheSm. Subsequently, the AppheSm gene fragment of approximately 1,100 bp from pET-28b(+)-AppheSm was amplified by PCR using primers P5 and P6 (which contained target sites for the restriction enzymes EcoRI and XhoI, respectively). The amplified AppheSm fragment was then ligated with the EcoRI- and XhoI-digested pSF118 vector to obtain the shuttle plasmid pJSF01, which will be used to assess the sensitivity of Av. paragallinarum to p-Cl-Phe.
The wild-type Av. paragallinarum strain SC05 was transformed with the plasmid pJSF01 via electroporation. The strain was first grown overnight in LB broth supplemented with 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD at 37°C. The overnight culture was then transferred into fresh LB broth with the same supplements and incubated with shaking until the optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) reached 0.8. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed four times with 10% glycerol under cold conditions to prepare electrocompetent cells. Subsequently, 1 µg of plasmid DNA was mixed with the competent cells, transferred into a 1 mm electroporation cuvette, and subjected to electroporation using a Gene Pulser Xcell Electroporation System (Bio-Rad, California, USA) at 1800 V/cm, 50 µF capacitance, and 200 Ω pulse resistance. Following transformation, strain recovery was accomplished via incubation in LB broth supplemented with 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD for 3 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. The transformants were then plated on LB agar containing the same supplements and 18 µg/mL gentamicin, followed by incubation for 24–48 h at 37 °C to screen for the recombinant strain JS01. Sixteen-hour cultures of the strains SC05 and JS01 were diluted 100-fold in fresh LB medium, incubated under rotary conditions (200 rpm) at 37°C until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6 was attained, and then subjected to counterselection on LB plates containing p-Cl-Phe (5, 10, 15, and 20 mM) for 24–48 h at 37°C. At least three independent replicates were employed for each strain.
Generation and identification of marker-free ApglgB mutant strains
The overall strategy for marker-free strains construction is shown in Fig. 9. First, we designed primers to amplify the flanking fragments of the target gene and the marker genes, including the upstream fragment, downstream fragment, ErmR, and AppheSm. Subsequently, the four fragments were assembled using overlap PCR and seamlessly cloned into the pUC19 vector. In the second step, the knock-out cassette containing AppheSm was introduced into Av. paragallinarum via natural transformation, followed by homologous recombination to obtain mutant strains with the genome-integrated knock-out cassette. In the third step, primers were designed to amplify the flanking fragments of the target gene. Similarly, the upstream and downstream fragments were joined using overlap PCR and cloned into the pUC19 vector. The extracted plasmid was then introduced into the previously obtained mutant strain via natural transformation, ultimately generating a marker-free mutant strain. It is worth noting that the primers for mutant strain verification were designed outside the primers used for amplifying the upstream and downstream fragments. This allows for the determination of whether genomic editing has occurred at the target locus.
The first step is the design and construction of the knock-out cassette, using the construction of the ApglgB knock-out cassette as an example. The counterselectable marker cassette was constructed by overlap extension PCR using DNA from the wild-type strain SC05 as a template and the primer pairs P7/P8 (for amplifying a 928 bp DNA fragment encompassing the upstream region of the gene ApglgB) and P9/P10 (for amplifying the 936 bp region downstream of the ApglgB locus). The AppheSm gene fragment (1,030 bp) was amplified by PCR from pET-28b(+)-AppheSm using the primer pair P11/P12, and the ErmR cassette (857 bp) was amplified from the plasmid pUC19-ErmR using the primer pair P13/P14. The resulting four fragments were connected by overlap extension PCR using the primers P7 and P10 to generate the cassette ApglgB::AppheSm. The plasmid pUC19 was amplified with the primer pair P15/P16, and the ApglgB::AppheSm cassette was seamlessly ligated into pUC19 to generate the plasmid pJSF02. It is worth noting that the core DNA uptake signal sequence (USS) 5′-ACCGCACTT-3′ (19) was retained in each upstream region, which was introduced through the forward primers.
The ApglgB marker-free knock-in strain was constructed in this study using a two-step strategy based on natural transformation (19). The first step involved the generation of the ApglgB insertion mutant containing an ApglgB::AppheSm knock-out cassette at the ApglgB locus on the genome. The strain SC05 was cultured for 16 h, diluted 100-fold in fresh LB broth, and incubated at 37°C under rotary conditions (200 rpm) until an OD600 of 0.6 was attained. The culture was thoroughly mixed with the plasmid pJSF02 and incubated in LB broth containing 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD at 37°C for 2 h. The resulting transformants (strain JS02) were screened on LB agar plates supplemented with 5 µg/mL erythromycin and incubated in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24–48 h. Single colonies on the plates were subjected to PCR analysis using the primers P31 and P32 to identify the successful insertion of the ApglgB::AppheSm knock-out cassette in the genomic DNA of strain SC05, with amplicon sizes of 4,411 and 2,536 bp corresponding to the strains JS02 and SC05, respectively. The PCR products of expected sizes were sequenced for verifying the appropriate insertion of the gene AppheSm.
A similar strategy was employed for the second step, which involved the replacement of the ApglgB::AppheSm knock-out cassette in the strain JS02 with the ApglgB::FtlpxE-marker-free cassette. For the construction of the marker-free knock-in cassette, the gene FtlpxE from Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida (accession number: CP000439.1) was synthesized and cloned into the plasmid pACYCDuet-1 (Merck Millipore, USA) to yield the plasmid pACYCDuet-1-FtlpxE; the FtlpxE gene fragment was then amplified by PCR using the primers P29/P30, and the ApglgB::FtlpxE-marker-free cassette, containing the gene FtlpxE flanked by homology arms of the ApglgB gene, was constructed by overlap extension PCR using the primers P7/P10. This cassette contained the above-mentioned USS sequence (which was introduced via the forward primer) and was cloned into the plasmid pUC19 to generate pJSF05. The plasmid pJSF05 was introduced into the strain JS02 via natural transformation. The plasmid pJSF05 was mixed with the strain JS02 and incubated in LB broth containing 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD at 37°C for 4 h. The cells were then spread onto LB agar plates containing 20 mM p-Cl-Phe to allow the counterselection of the marker-free ApglgB mutant and incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 24–48 h. The transformants were identified using the primers P31 and P32. A successful replacement of the ApglgB::AppheSm knock-out cassette with ApglgB::FtlpxE-marker-free is expected to yield an amplicon of 3,208 bp, compared with 4,411 bp obtained with the strain JS02. The marker-free knock-in strain at the ApglgB locus was successfully generated, resulting in JS05.
Generation and identification of marker-free ApcpsB and ApneuB mutant strains
The insertion knock-out cassettes ApcpsB::AppheSm and ApneuB::AppheSm were similarly generated, but using different primers. Briefly, the upstream (592 bp) and downstream (503 bp) regions of the gene ApcpsB were amplified from the genomic DNA of the strain SC05 using the primers P17, P18, P19, and P20. Subsequently, these two fragments were merged with the AppheSm and ErmR fragments to yield the ApcpsB::AppheSm cassette by overlap extension PCR using the primers P17/P20. The upstream (552 bp) and downstream (436 bp) regions of the gene ApneuB were amplified from the genomic DNA of strain SC05 using the primers P21, P22, P23, and P24; these fragments were subsequently merged with the AppheSm and ErmR fragments to yield the ApneuB::AppheSm cassette by overlap extension PCR using the primers P21/P24. These cassettes were subsequently cloned into the plasmid pUC19 by seamless ligation, as detailed above. The plasmids containing the ApcpsB::AppheSm and ApneuB::AppheSm cassettes are referred to as pJSF03 and pJSF04, respectively.
Marker-free cassettes can be designed to achieve knock-out of endogenous genes as well as knock-in of exogenous genes and are constructed using overlap extension PCR. The ApcpsB-marker-free and ApneuB-marker-free cassettes were designed to achieve marker-free knock-out of the genes ApcpsB and ApneuB, respectively. The primers P17/P25 and P26/P20 were used to amplify the upstream and downstream regions, respectively, of the gene ApcpsB from the genomic DNA of the strain SCO5 and incorporated into the ApcpsB-marker-free cassette by overlap extension PCR using the primers P17/P20. The ApneuB-marker-free cassette was similarly generated using a different set of primers; the upstream and downstream regions of ApneuB were amplified by PCR using the primers P21/P27 and P28/P24, respectively, and incorporated into the ApneuB-marker-free cassette by overlap extension PCR using the primers P21/P24. All these cassettes contained the abovementioned USS sequence (which was introduced via the forward primer) and were cloned into the plasmid pUC19. The plasmids containing the ApcpsB-marker-free and ApneuB-marker-free cassettes have been referred to as pJSF06 and pJSF07, respectively.
The construction of ApcpsB and ApneuB marker-free mutant strains followed a similar approach to that used for the ApglgB mutant strain. Specifically, pJS03 was used for natural transformation to generate the ApcpsB insertion mutant strain JS03, while pJS06 was used for transformation to obtain the ApcpsB marker-free mutant strain JS06. For ApneuB, pJS04 was used to generate ApcpsB insertion mutant strain JS04, while pJS07 was used to obtain the ApneuB marker-free mutant strain JS07. The strains harboring genomic deletion of the genes ApcpsB and ApneuB were constructed as detailed above for ApglgB, except that different primers were employed for PCR-based screening. The primers P33/P34 were used to amplify the ApcpsB locus, yielding PCR amplicons of sizes 3,908, 1,308, and 1,849 bp, corresponding to the strains JS03, JS06, and SC05 (wild-type strain), respectively. The primers P35/P36 were employed for amplifying the ApneuB locus, yielding PCR amplicons of sizes 3,745, 1,134, and 1,645 bp, corresponding to the strains JS04, JS07, and SC05 (wild-type strain), respectively.
Construction and identification of ApcpsB and ApneuB mutants complemented with the corresponding genes
To generate the ApcpsB complement strain, the complete ApcpsB gene (1,089 bp) was amplified using the primer pair P37/P38, while the shuttle plasmid pSF118 was amplified using the primer pair P39/P40. These two fragments were then seamlessly ligated to generate the plasmid pJSF08. The plasmid pJSF08 was introduced into the strain JS06 via electroporation. Following recovery, the culture was evenly distributed on LB agar plates supplemented with gentamicin (18 µg/mL). The plates were then incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 24–48 h. Subsequently, the positive transformants (yielding an amplicon of approximately 1,000 bp) were detected by colony PCR using the primer pair P41/P42 and termed as the ApcpsB-complemented mutant strain JS08. The ApneuB-complemented mutant strain was similarly generated, except that different primers were employed; the primers P43 and P44 were employed for amplifying the complete ApneuB gene (1,038 bp), which was then cloned into plasmid pSF118 to construct the plasmid pJSF09. The plasmid pJSF09 was then introduced into the strain JS07 as detailed above, and the transformants (yielding an amplicon of size about 1,000 bp and termed the ApneuB-complemented mutant strain JS09) were identified by PCR using the primers P41 and P42.
Construction and characterization of Av. paragallinarum with a His-tag introduced ApompA
To construct a strain with a His-tagged OmpA, the upstream (539 bp) and downstream (387 bp) regions of the gene ApompA were amplified from the wild-type strain SC05 using the primers P45, P46, P47, and P48. Subsequently, these two fragments were connected with the AppheSm and ErmR fragments to yield the ApompA-His-tagged::AppheSm cassette by overlap PCR using the primers P45/P48. This cassette was then cloned to pUC19, as mentioned above, to generate pJSF10. Subsequently, this plasmid was used to construct the ApompA C-terminal insertion strain, JS10. The upstream and downstream fragments of marker-free His-tagged ApompA cassette were amplified using primers P45/P49 and P47/P48 and then connected with primers P45 and P48. The cassette was seamlessly cloned into the pUC19 vector as mentioned above to generate pJSF11. Next, this plasmid was used for the construction of the marker-free His-tagged ApompA strain, resulting in strain JS11. The strain JS11 was confirmed by PCR, sequencing, and Western blot.
Isolation and identification of lipid A
Lipid A was isolated as detailed previously (31, 63), but with certain modifications to the procedure. The strain was cultured in a conical flask containing 100 mL of LB medium and incubated for 16 h at 37°C under rotary conditions (200 rpm). The culture was then centrifuged (8,000 × g, 10 min) to harvest the cells, followed by the addition of lysis buffer (30 mL; water, chloroform, and methanol in a ratio of 0.8:1:2) and cell lysis via two rounds of crushing in a cell crusher for a period of 10 min each. The lysed cells were then subjected to centrifugation (8,000 × g, 10 min), followed by the removal of the supernatant. Subsequently, a solution of citric acid (30 mL, 0.1 M, pH 2.9) was added and mixed with the cell pellet. The mixture was then treated in a boiling water bath (100°C) for 90 min to achieve complete hydrolysis of LOS and the release of lipid A. The precipitate obtained following centrifugation was again collected, dried, and stored at –20°C. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was carried out using the UltrafleXtreme instrument (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany) in negative-ion mode. Samples were mixed with 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix solution (10 mg/mL) and were analyzed using MS. The mass spectra corresponding to lipid A (m/z range of 900–2,500) were documented.
Extraction and analysis of CPS and LOS
The extraction of CPS was carried out as detailed previously (46), with a few modifications. The bacteria cultured on LB agar plates were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), harvested via centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min), and subsequently rinsed again with PBS. The cells were then resuspended in 1 mL of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl and 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 7.3) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide was added at a final concentration of 0.5% (wt/vol), and the cells were incubated for 16 h at room temperature. The mixture was then subjected to centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min), and the resulting precipitate was dissolved in 1 M sodium chloride (0.2 mL). The solution was then mixed with Trizol reagent (1 mL) and chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1, 0.2 mL). The liquid obtained was collected, mixed with four times its volume of ethanol, and incubated at −70°C for 1 h to precipitate the CPS. Following centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min), the solid precipitate containing the CPS was dissolved in 0.5 mL of buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM potassium chloride, and 1.5 mM magnesium chloride, pH 8.3). The sample was then treated with DNase I (Takara, Japan) and RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at 37°C for 1 h to remove any residual DNA and RNA. The CPS samples were analyzed using gradient (4%–20%) SDS–PAGE, followed by silver staining. LOS extraction was carried out as previously described (64); the LOS samples were separated on a 15% SDS–PAGE gel and visualized by silver staining.
Serum bactericidal assay
Chicken and porcine sera were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of South China, China. The sera were subjected to filter sterilization using 0.22 μm filters, and aliquots were stored at −80°C. An aliquot of the serum samples was inactivated by heat treatment at 56°C for 30 min. The serum bactericidal assay was carried out with porcine and chicken sera as per a previously outlined protocol (65). To achieve a final serum concentration of 90%, 0.1 mL of the bacterial culture, grown to logarithmic phase (approximately 1 × 108 CFU/mL), was added to 0.9 mL of fresh or heat-treated chicken sera. The reaction mixtures were incubated under moderate shaking conditions at 37°C for 1 h. The mixtures were then subjected to 10-fold serial dilutions, and a 0.1 mL aliquot from each dilution was plated in triplicate on LB agar plates supplemented with 10% chicken serum and 0.01% NAD. The plates were then incubated for 24–48 h at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2, and the colonies were counted. A similar experimental protocol was followed for porcine serum, except that a serum concentration of 30% was employed. The survival ratio was calculated by comparing the number of colonies obtained upon treatment with fresh serum to those with heat-treated serum. Each strain of Av. paragallinarum was evaluated in three independent experiments.
Southern blot analysis
To confirm genes marker-free knock-outs by Southern blotting, 5 μg of gDNA from the ApglgB mutant was digested with KpnI, gDNA from the ApneuB mutant or FtlpxE integrated strain was digested with NheI, and gDNA from ApcpsB mutant was treated with EcoRI for 16 h at 37°C. Products of restriction enzyme digestion were resolved by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel at 30 V for 16 h, and the resulting fragments were transferred to a nylon membrane via capillary blotting. The probe fragments were amplified and cloned into the pUC19 vector. The resulting recombinant plasmids were then used as templates for probe amplification with primers P50/P51 for ApglgB, P52/P53 for ApneuB, and P54/P55 for ApcpsB. The prepared probes were labeled using the DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit I (Roche, Germany), and hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Expression and purification of ApOmpA
The ApompA gene was amplified from the genome of wild-type strain SC05 using primers P56 and P57 and seamlessly cloned into the HindIII-digested pET-28(a) vector to generate the expression plasmid pJSF12. This plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) to obtain the ApOmpA expression strain JS12. Cultures were grown at 37 °C to an OD₆₀₀ of approximately 0.6, induced with 0.5 mM IPTG, and incubated for 4 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0), and disrupted by sonication. Inclusion bodies were recovered by centrifugation and washed with lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 to remove contaminants. The pellet was solubilized in lysis buffer with 8 M urea, and the protein was purified by Ni–NTA affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. Bound proteins were washed and eluted with buffers containing either 10 mM or 300 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), and 8 M urea.
Western blot analysis
Cultures of the wild-type (WT) strain and the OmpA-His-tag recombinant strain were subjected to ultrasonication to disrupt the cells, followed by centrifugation to collect the pellets. The resulting pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and separated by 12% SDS–PAGE. Subsequently, immunoblotting was performed using a monoclonal anti-His-tag antibody (GenScript, China), and protein bands were visualized with the Immobilon Western chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore, USA).
Transcriptomic analysis
Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA). Quality and integrity were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent). Zymo-Seq RiboFree Total RNA Library Kit (Zymo Research, USA) was used to remove rRNA from total RNA. Random oligonucleotides and SuperScript III were used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA. Second-strand cDNA synthesis was subsequently performed using DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. The remaining overhangs were converted into blunt ends via exonuclease/polymerase activities, and the enzymes were removed. After adenylation of the 3′ ends of the DNA fragments, Illumina PE adapter oligonucleotides were ligated to prepare for hybridization. To select cDNA fragments of the preferred 400–500 bp in length, the library fragments were purified using the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, USA). DNA fragments with ligated adaptor molecules on both ends were selectively enriched using Illumina PCR Primer Cocktail in a 15-cycle PCR reaction. Products were purified (AMPure XP system) and quantified using the Agilent high sensitivity DNA assay on a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent, USA). The sequencing library was then sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, USA) by Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
The quality information of raw data in FASTQ format was calculated, and then the raw data were filtered using Cutadapt (v1.15) software. Clean data were obtained by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing poly-N, and low-quality reads. All subsequent analyses were based on high-quality clean data. The reference genome and gene annotation files were downloaded from NCBI website (accession No: CP113955). The reference genome index was built using Bowtie2 (v2.2.6), and the filtered reads were mapped to the reference genome using Bowtie2 (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/index.shtml). The gene read count value was counted using HTSeq (v0.9.1) as the original expression level of the gene. In order to make the gene expression levels of different genes and different samples comparable, FPKM (fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped) is used to normalize the expression. DESeq (v1.30.0) was conducted to analyze the differential expressed mRNA. Transcripts with |log2FoldChange|>1 and P-value < 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed mRNA. Volcano maps and MA maps of differentially expressed mRNAs were generated using the R language ggplot2 software package. The complete transcriptome analysis (Data Set S1) is provided in the supplementary materials.
Scanning electron microscopy
Bacterial pellets after serum treatment were harvested by centrifugation, with each pellet reaching at least the size of a rice grain. Remove the culture medium, then wash the bacteria with PBS, and remove the PBS. Add the fixative to the tube and let the precipitation re-suspend in the fixative. For post-fixation, the bacterial pellets were washed three times with 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 15 min each, followed by incubation in 1% OsO₄ in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 1–2 h at room temperature. The samples were then washed again three times in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 15 min each. Dehydration was performed sequentially in 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% ethanol for 15 min each, followed by two changes of 100% ethanol for 15 min, and finally transferred to isoamyl acetate for 15 min. Samples were dropped onto coverslips and dried using a critical point dryer. The dried specimens were mounted on metallic stubs with carbon adhesive and sputter-coated with gold for 30 s. Prepared samples were then examined and imaged using a scanning electron microscope.
Transmission electron microscopy
Bacterial pellets after serum treatment were collected by centrifugation, ensuring that each pellet reached at least the size of a mung bean. The pellets were resuspended in TEM fixative and fixed at 4°C for preservation. The fixed samples were centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and the pellets were washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) for 3 min, repeating this three times. The 1% agarose solution was prepared in advance and cooled before use; the pellets were then suspended in the agarose prior to solidification and embedded within the agarose blocks. For post-fixation, the agarose blocks were incubated in 1% OsO₄ in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature in the dark, followed by three washes in 0.1 M PB for 15 min each. Dehydration was performed at room temperature through a graded ethanol series of 50%, 70%, 80%, and 95% ethanol for 20 min each, followed by two changes of 100% ethanol for 20 min and two changes of acetone for 15 min.
Resin infiltration was carried out sequentially in acetone:EMBed-812 mixtures of 1:1 for 2–4 h at 37°C, 1:2 overnight at 37°C, and then in pure EMBed-812 for 5–8 h at 37°C. Samples were embedded in fresh EMBed-812 in molds and kept at 37°C overnight. Polymerization was performed at 60°C for more than 48 h, after which the resin blocks were removed from the molds and stored at room temperature. Ultrathin sections (60–80 nm) were cut using an ultramicrotome and collected onto 150-mesh copper grids coated with formvar film. Sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate in saturated alcohol for 8 min in the dark, rinsed in 70% ethanol and ultrapure water, and then stained with 2.6% lead citrate for 8 min while avoiding CO₂ exposure, followed by ultrapure water washes. After being dried on filter paper, the copper grids were placed on the grid board and left overnight to dry at room temperature. The copper grids were observed under a TEM, and images were taken.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was conducted at least three times, and the standard deviation was calculated using GraphPad Prism 9 (San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t-test was employed for assessing the significance of the observed variations. P-values of < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD1800200).
Contributor Information
Yu Han, Email: hanyuscau@126.com.
Saixiang Feng, Email: fengsx@scau.edu.cn.
Arpita Bose, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The authors confirm that the data for this study are available in the article and its supplementary material. Plasmid sequences based on AppheSm screening markers are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02398-25.
Transcriptome data.
Tables S1 and S2; Fig. S1.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Blackall PJ. 1999. Infectious coryza: overview of the disease and new diagnostic options. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:627–632. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Soriano EV, Garduño ML, Téllez G, Rosas PF, Suárez-Güemes F, Blackall PJ. 2004. Cross-protection study of the nine serovars of Haemophilus paragallinarum in the Kume haemagglutinin scheme. Avian Pathol 33:506–511. doi: 10.1080/03079450400003502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bisgaard M, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, de Wit SJ, Hess C, Christensen H. 2012. Multilocus sequence phylogenetic analysis of Avibacterium. Microbiology (Reading) 158:993–1004. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.054429-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Li D, Huo C, Li G, Zhu M, Xu F, Qiao J, Sun H. 2024. The absence of luxS reduces the invasion of Avibacterium paragallinarum but is not essential for virulence. Front Vet Sci 11:1427966. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1427966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hashish A, Chaves M, Macedo NR, Sato Y, Schmitz-Esser S, Wilson D, El-Gazzar M. 2023. Complete genome sequences generated using hybrid Nanopore-Illumina assembly of two non-typical Avibacterium paragallinarum strains isolated from clinically normal chicken flocks. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0012823. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00128-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tataje-Lavanda L, Montalvan A, Montesinos R, Morales-Erasto V, Zimic-Peralta M, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Fernandez-Diaz M. 2019. Genomic islands in the full-genome sequence of an NAD-hemin-independent. Microbiol Resour Announc. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00118-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aguilar-Bultet L, Calderon-Copete SP, Frey J, Falquet L. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the virulent Avibacterium paragallinarum serotype A strain JF4211 and identification of two toxins. Genome Announc 1:e00592-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00592-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xu F, Miao D, Du Y, Chen X, Zhang P, Sun H. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Avibacterium paragallinarum strain 221. Genome Announc 1. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00290-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tu TY, Hsieh MK, Tan DH, Ou SC, Shien JH, Yen TY, Chang PC. 2015. Loss of the capsule increases the adherence activity but decreases the virulence of Avibacterium paragallinarum. Avian Dis 59:87–93. doi: 10.1637/10937-091414-reg [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liu CC, Ou SC, Tan DH, Hsieh MK, Shien JH, Chang PC. 2016. The fimbrial protein is a virulence factor and potential vaccine antigen of Avibacterium paragallinarum. Avian Dis 60:649–655. doi: 10.1637/11410-031316-Reg.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pan YC, Tan DH, Shien JH, Liu CC, He YS, Shen PC, Chang PC. 2012. Identification and characterization of an RTX toxin-like gene and its operon from Avibacterium paragallinarum. Avian Dis 56:537–544. doi: 10.1637/10047-122211-Reg.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ramón Rocha MO, García-González O, Pérez-Méndez A, Ibarra-Caballero J, Pérez-Márquez VM, Vaca S, Negrete-Abascal E. 2006. Membrane vesicles released by Avibacterium paragallinarum contain putative virulence factors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 257:63–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00154.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chiang YT, Shien JH, Tan DH, Shieh MK, Liu CC, Chen YS, Chang PC. 2013. Identification of the lic1ABCD operon that controls the phase-variable expression of phosphorylcholine on lipopolysaccharide from Avibacterium paragallinarum. Avian Pathol 42:72–78. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2012.760840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Reyrat JM, Pelicic V, Gicquel B, Rappuoli R. 1998. Counterselectable markers: untapped tools for bacterial genetics and pathogenesis. Infect Immun 66:4011–4017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.9.4011-4017.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Liu M, Wang M, Zhu D, Wang M, Jia R, Chen S, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X, Biville F, Cheng A. 2016. Investigation of TbfA in Riemerella anatipestifer using plasmid-based methods for gene over-expression and knockdown. Sci Rep 6:37159. doi: 10.1038/srep37159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bigas A, Garrido ME, de Rozas AMP, Badiola I, Barbé J, Llagostera M. 2005. Development of a genetic manipulation system for Haemophilus parasuis. Vet Microbiol 105:223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liu M, Huang Y, Liu J, Biville F, Zhu D, Wang M, Jia R, Chen S, Zhao X, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhang S, Chen X, Liu Y, Zhang L, You Y, Yu Y, Cheng A. 2018. Multiple genetic tools for editing the genome of Riemerella anatipestifer using a counterselectable marker. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:7475–7488. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9181-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tatum FM, Briggs RE. 2005. Construction of in-frame aroA deletion mutants of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Haemophilus somnus by using a new temperature-sensitive plasmid. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7196–7202. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7196-7202.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Liu D, Zhang H, Tan H, Jin Y, Zhang C, Bo Z, Zhang X, Guo M, Wu Y. 2023. Basic characterization of natural transformation in Avibacterium paragallinarum. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0520922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05209-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Saedler H, Starlinger P. 1967. 0 degree mutations in the galactose operon in E. coli. Molec Gen Genetics 100:190–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00333605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhou C, Shi L, Ye B, Feng H, Zhang J, Zhang R, Yan X. 2017. pheS (*) , an effective host-genotype-independent counter-selectable marker for marker-free chromosome deletion in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:217–227. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7906-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Drecktrah D, Douglas JM, Samuels DS. 2010. Use of rpsL as a counterselectable marker in Borrelia burgdorferi. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:985–987. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02172-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Pelicic V, Reyrat JM, Gicquel B. 1996. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene confers sucrose sensitivity on mycobacteria. J Bacteriol 178:1197–1199. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.4.1197-1199.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Brassinga AKC, Croxen MA, Shoemaker CJ, Morash MG, LeBlanc JJ, Hoffman PS, - . 2006. Novel use of Helicobacter pylori nitroreductase (rdxA) as a counterselectable marker in allelic vector exchange to create Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia-1 mutants, p 339–342. In Cianciotto NP, Abukwaik PH Edelstein (ed), Legionella: state of the art 30 years after its recognition. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kast P, Hennecke H. 1991. Amino acid substrate specificity of Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase altered by distinct mutations. J Mol Biol 222:99–124. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90740-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kast P. 1994. pKSS--a second-generation general purpose cloning vector for efficient positive selection of recombinant clones. Gene 138:109–114. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90790-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gao G, Wei D, Li G, Chen P, Wu L, Liu S, Zhang Y. 2022. Highly effective markerless genetic manipulation of Streptococcus suis using a mutated PheS-based counterselectable marker. Front Microbiol 13:947821. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.947821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Argov T, Rabinovich L, Sigal N, Herskovits AA. 2017. An effective counterselection system for Listeria monocytogenes and its use to characterize the monocin genomic region of strain 10403S. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02927-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02927-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Raetz CRH, Whitfield C. 2002. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu Rev Biochem 71:635–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wang X, Karbarz MJ, McGrath SC, Cotter RJ, Raetz CR. 2004. MsbA transporter-dependent lipid A 1-dephosphorylation on the periplasmic surface of the inner membrane: topography of Francisella novicida LpxE expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279:49470–49478. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409078200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kocsis B, Kilár A, Péter S, Dörnyei Á, Sándor V, Kilár F. 2017. Mass spectrometry for profiling LOS and lipid A structures from whole-cell lysates: directly from a few bacterial colonies or from liquid broth cultures. Methods Mol Biol 1600:187–198. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6958-6_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang YP, Hsieh MK, Tan DH, Shien JH, Ou SC, Chen CF, Chang PC. 2014. The haemagglutinin of Avibacterium paragallinarum is a trimeric autotransporter adhesin that confers haemagglutination, cell adherence and biofilm formation activities. Vet Microbiol 174:474–482. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen L, Sun J, Hu J, Tian Y, Du P, Guo Q, Yang C, Zhang Q, Feng S, Liao M. 2024. Identification and characterization of biosynthetic loci of lipooligosaccharide and capsular polysaccharide in Avibacterium paragallinarum. Vet Microbiol 299:110317. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Jiang J, Zhao Y, Chen A, Sun J, Zhou M, Hu J, Cao X, Dai N, Liang Z, Feng S. 2024. Efficient markerless genetic manipulation of Pasteurella multocida using lacZ and pheSm as selection markers. Appl Environ Microbiol:e0204323. doi: 10.1128/aem.02043-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Guo Y, Hu D, Guo J, Li X, Guo J, Wang X, Xiao Y, Jin H, Liu M, Li Z, Bi D, Zhou Z. 2017. The role of the regulator fur in gene regulation and virulence of Riemerella anatipestifer assessed using an unmarked gene deletion system. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:382. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kaczmarczyk A, Vorholt JA, Francez-Charlot A. 2012. Markerless gene deletion system for sphingomonads. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3774–3777. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07347-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Xin Y, Guo T, Mu Y, Kong J. 2017. Development of a counterselectable seamless mutagenesis system in lactic acid bacteria. Microb Cell Fact 16:116. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0731-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Crittenden CM, Akin LD, Morrison LJ, Trent MS, Brodbelt JS. 2017. Characterization of lipid A variants by energy-resolved mass spectrometry: impact of acyl chains. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 28:1118–1126. doi: 10.1007/s13361-016-1542-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kabanov DS, Prokhorenko IR. 2010. Structural analysis of lipopolysaccharides from Gram-negative bacteria. Biochemistry (Mosc) 75:383–404. doi: 10.1134/s0006297910040012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhou Z, Lin S, Cotter RJ, Raetz CR. 1999. Lipid A modifications characteristic of Salmonella typhimurium are induced by NH4VO3 in Escherichia coli K12. detection of 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose, phosphoethanolamine and palmitate. J Biol Chem 274:18503–18514. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Matsuura M. 2013. Structural modifications of bacterial lipopolysaccharide that facilitate gram-negative bacteria evasion of host innate immunity. Front Immunol 4:109. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rietschel ET, Kirikae T, Schade FU, Mamat U, Schmidt G, Loppnow H, Ulmer AJ, Zähringer U, Seydel U, Di Padova F, Schreier M, Brade H. 1994. Bacterial endotoxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and function. The FASEB Journal 8:217–225. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.2.8119492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Jo SH, Park HG, Song WS, Kim SM, Kim EJ, Yang YH, Kim JS, Kim BG, Kim YG. 2019. Structural characterization of phosphoethanolamine-modified lipid A from probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917. RSC Adv 9:19762–19771. doi: 10.1039/c9ra02375e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Raetz CRH, Reynolds CM, Trent MS, Bishop RE. 2007. Lipid A modification systems in gram-negative bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 76:295–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.010307.145803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Molinaro A, Holst O, Di Lorenzo F, Callaghan M, Nurisso A, D’Errico G, Zamyatina A, Peri F, Berisio R, Jerala R, Jiménez‐Barbero J, Silipo A, Martín‐Santamaría S. 2015. Chemistry of Lipid A: at the heart of innate immunity. Chemistry A European J 21:500–519. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wu J-R, Chen P-Y, Shien J-H, Shyu C-L, Shieh HK, Chang F, Chang P-C. 2010. Analysis of the biosynthesis genes and chemical components of the capsule of Avibacterium paragallinarum. Vet Microbiol 145:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Annunziato PW, Wright LF, Vann WF, Silver RP. 1995. Nucleotide sequence and genetic analysis of the neuD and neuB genes in region 2 of the polysialic acid gene cluster of Escherichia coli K1. J Bacteriol 177:312–319. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.2.312-319.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Linton D, Karlyshev AV, Hitchen PG, Morris HR, Dell A, Gregson NA, Wren BW. 2000. Multiple N-acetyl neuraminic acid synthetase (neuB) genes in Campylobacter jejuni: identification and characterization of the gene involved in sialylation of lipo-oligosaccharide. Mol Microbiol 35:1120–1134. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01780.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gunawan J, Simard D, Gilbert M, Lovering AL, Wakarchuk WW, Tanner ME, Strynadka NCJ. 2005. Structural and mechanistic analysis of sialic acid synthase NeuB from Neisseria meningitidis in complex with Mn2+, phosphoenolpyruvate, and N-acetylmannosaminitol. J Biol Chem 280:3555–3563. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411942200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Berg TO, Gurung MK, Altermark B, Smalås AO, Ræder ILU. 2015. Characterization of the N-acetylneuraminic acid synthase (NeuB) from the psychrophilic fish pathogen Moritella viscosa. Carbohydr Res 402:133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2014.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sundaram AK, Pitts L, Muhammad K, Wu J, Betenbaugh M, Woodard RW, Vann WF. 2004. Characterization of N-acetylneuraminic acid synthase isoenzyme 1 from Campylobacter jejuni. Biochem J 383:83–89. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lüneberg E, Zetzmann N, Alber D, Knirel YA, Kooistra O, Zähringer U, Frosch M. 2000. Cloning and functional characterization of a 30 kb gene locus required for lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Legionella pneumophila. Int J Med Microbiol 290:37–49. doi: 10.1016/S1438-4221(00)80104-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Berrington AW, Tan Y-C, Srikhanta Y, Kuipers B, van der Ley P, Peak IRA, Jennings MP. 2002. Phase variation in meningococcal lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis genes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 34:267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00633.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Diallo IS, Frost AJ. 2000. Survival of avian strains of Pasteurella multocida in chicken serum. Vet Microbiol 72:153–161. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00195-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Zou Y, Feng S, Xu C, Zhang B, Zhou S, Zhang L, He X, Li J, Yang Z, Liao M. 2013. The role of galU and galE of Haemophilus parasuis SC096 in serum resistance and biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol 162:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hallström T, Riesbeck K. 2010. Haemophilus influenzae and the complement system. Trends Microbiol 18:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lee W, Syed Atif A, Tan SC, Leow CH. 2017. Insights into the chicken IgY with emphasis on the generation and applications of chicken recombinant monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods 447:71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Dennis JJ, Zylstra GJ. 1998. Plasposons: modular self-cloning minitransposon derivatives for rapid genetic analysis of gram-negative bacterial genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2710–2715. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.7.2710-2715.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Robert X, Gouet P. 2014. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W320–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Briggs RE, Tatum FM. 2005. Generation and molecular characterization of new temperature-sensitive plasmids intended for genetic engineering of Pasteurellaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7187–7195. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7187-7195.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Norrander J, Kempe T, Messing J. 1983. Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene 26:101–106. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90040-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Tawab A, Akbar N, Hasssan M, Habib F, Ali A, Rahman M, Jabbar A, Rauf W, Iqbal M. 2020. Mass spectrometric analysis of lipid A obtained from the lipopolysaccharide of Pasteurella multocida RSC Adv 10:30917–30933. doi: 10.1039/d0ra05463a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Feng S, Chen A, Wang X, Pan Z, Xu S, Yu H, Zhang B, Liao M. 2020. The Glaesserella parasuis phosphoglucomutase is partially required for lipooligosaccharide synthesis. Vet Res 51:97. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00822-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhang B, He Y, Xu C, Xu L, Feng S, Liao M, Ren T. 2012. Cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) of the Haemophilus parasuis SC096 strain contributes to serum resistance and adherence to and invasion of PK-15 and PUVEC cells. Vet Microbiol 157:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Transcriptome data.
Tables S1 and S2; Fig. S1.
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data for this study are available in the article and its supplementary material. Plasmid sequences based on AppheSm screening markers are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.









