Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):1011–1012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1011

Maternal smoking and risk of hypertrophic infantile pyloric stenosis: 10 year population based cohort study

Henrik Toft Sørensen a, Bente Nørgård a, Lars Pedersen a, Helle Larsen b, Søren Paaske Johnsen a
PMCID: PMC131019  PMID: 12411361

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis affects 0.5 to 3.0 per 1000 live births.1,2 The aetiology is unclear, but family history and sex distribution seem important and might indicate a genetic role.3 However, a recently reported fall in the incidence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis suggests that environmental factors are also important.4 During the last decade a similar reduction in the proportion of pregnant women who smoke was reported in Denmark,5 raising the possibility that maternal smoking is a risk factor for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. This hypothesis is supported by the reported ecological association between infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and sudden infant death syndrome.1 Maternal smoking is also a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome,1 and we therefore examined whether maternal smoking was a risk factor for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a population based Danish cohort.

Methods and results

We conducted the study between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2000 in the Danish county of North Jutland and included data on all women who delivered a live infant after 28 weeks' gestation. The county birth registry contains information on all births since 1 January 1991. The main data comprise maternal age, self reported smoking status at the first visit to the midwife, birth order, gestational age, length and weight of neonates at birth, civil status, and civil registry numbers for both mother and child.

We identified all cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis from the county hospital discharge registry, which contains data on all discharges from the hospitals since 1977, the civil registry number, dates of admission and discharge, surgical procedures performed, and up to 20 diagnoses classified according to the international classification of diseases (ICD-8 until the end of 1993 and then ICD-10). The codes for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were 750.19 (ICD-8) and Q40.0 (ICD-10). The civil registry numbers were used to link the records in both registries.

We used SAS version 8.02 for logistic regression. We estimated the risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis among infants born to smoking mothers and non-smoking mothers adjusted for maternal age, civil status, birth order, and sex of the child.

There were 57 996 births during the study, and 16 725 (28.8%) mothers smoked. We identified 78 cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, yielding a cumulative incidence of 1.3%. Thirty five cases (0.2%) occurred among maternal smokers compared with 43 (0.1%) among maternal non-smokers, giving a relative risk of 2.0. The adjusted odds ratio was also 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.1, table). The correlation between the proportion of smokers and annual incidence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis per birth year was 0.65 (Spearman's τ=0.65, P=0.04). The highest incidence was 0.22% in 1991 (33% were smokers), the lowest 0.05% in 1997 (28% smokers).

Comment

Our data suggest that maternal smoking is a risk factor for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. We cannot determine whether the association is caused by smoking during pregnancy or postnatally—that is, through breast milk or passive smoking. We were able to adjust for some risk factors, but confounding by unknown factors associated with smoking cannot be ruled out.

The strengths of our study are the population based design and the prospective registration of smoking status and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. In addition, the data were complete and collected independently of the hypothesis. The incidence corresponds closely with that previously reported.5 Any misclassification of smoking status and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis will bias the risk estimates towards unity.

Table.

Risk of hypertrophic infantile pyloric stenosis according to maternal smoking status and other variables

No of cases/total births Crude odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio* (95% CI)
Smoking status:
 Non-smoker 43/41 271 1 1
 Smoker 35/16 725 2.0 (1.3 to 3.1) 2.0 (1.3 to 3.1)
Sex of child:
 Female 10/28 329 1 1
 Male 68/29 667  6.5 (3.3 to 12.6)  6.5 (3.3 to 12.6)
Pregnancy:
 First 44/24 971 1 1
 Subsequent 34/33 022 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1)
Maternal age (years):
  <25 20/11 381 1 1
  25-30 38/23 828 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6) 1.1 (0.6 to 1.9)
  >30 20/22 787 0.5 (0.3 to 0.9) 0.7 (0.3 to 1.3)
Civil status:
 Unmarried 6/2 586 1 1
 Married 72/55 124 0.6 (0.2 to 1.3) 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6)
*

Adjusted for maternal age, civil status, birth order, and sex of the child. 

3 missing values. 

1286 missing values. 

Footnotes

Funding: Western Danish Research Forum for Health Sciences.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Persson S, Ekbom A, Granath F, Nordenskjöld A. Parallel incidences of sudden infant death syndrome and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; a common cause? Pediatrics. 2001;108:379–381. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.e70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Applegate MS, Druschel CM. The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in New York State, 1983 to 1990. Arch Pediatri Adolesc Med. 1995;149:1123–1129. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230077011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mitchell LE, Risch N. The genetics of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a reanalysis. Am J Dis Child. 1991;147:1203–1211. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160350077012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nielsen JP, Haahr P, Haahr J. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Decreasing incidence. Dan Med Bull. 2000;47:223–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wisborg K, Henriksen T, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Smoking habits among Danish pregnant women from 1989 to 1996 in relation to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:836–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES