Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Apr 22;21(4):e0336415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336415

Cadmium-induced DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and cell injury in gill of freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense

Jianxia Liu 1,2, Lijuan Yu 3, Jiachuan Yang 1,2, Rui Zhang 1,2, Jing Bai 1,2, Jinxiang Wang 1,2,*
Editor: Mei Li4
PMCID: PMC13102191  PMID: 42018517

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) is an extremely toxic heavy metal and widespread in the environment, which has been demonstrated closely associated with numerous organs damage and even death. To evaluate the signaling pathway and the toxicity induced by Cd2+ in aquatic organisms, freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense were exposed to Cd2+ (0, 14.5, 29 and 58 mg/L) for 4 d. The results showed that Cd2+ induced the increase of diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3), the rapid change of Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm and activation of protein kinase C (PKC) in the gill of crab. Also, Cd2+ raised the expressions of 6 genes relating with protein detoxification and folding, including cytochrome P450 (CYP450), BAG regulator 3 (BAG3), protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and 3 genes encoding heat shock proteins (Hsp21, Hsp27 and Hsp70). And, it was observed that Cd2+ exposure aggravated filament swelling and raised the number of dead epidermal cell in gill. Meanwhile, Cd2+ exposure degraded DNA which was accompanied by an obvious decrease in ATP level. In conclusion, Cd2+ triggered DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway, caused gene expression, DNA degradation and ATP decrease, and finally induced the cell injury in S. henanense based on histological observation. This study would provide us fundamental information to discover the underlying mechanism of Cd2+-induced cytotoxicity.

1. Introduction

Cadmium ion (Cd2+) is an extremely toxic industrial pollution of global concern. Due to the thriving coal mining, coking plant, iron, steel, and chemical industries, highly toxic Cd2+ have been frequently detected in rivers, estuaries, and near-shore waters. During the heavy metal pollution incident in Longjiang, Guangxi, China in 2012, Cd2+ concentration in the water reached a peak that exceeded the standard by 80 times, and the length of the river section where Cd2+ concentration exceeded the standard by more than 5 times was 100 kilometers [1]. Cd2+ couldn’t be decomposed through chemical or microbial pathway and would continuously and irreversibly accumulate in aquatic animals through feeding and respiration, posing a great threat to public health worldwide [2]. Cd2+ disturbs both cell membrane integrity and various metabolic responses, and exerts toxic effects on multiple organs [36]. The dietary and water polluted with Cd2+ can not only lead to distinct damages to the outer skin, scales, and gills of goldfish, but also causes inner damages in different organs such as gills lamella shrunk and broken, the necrotic muscles myoepithelium along with disrupted muscles bundle, and abnormal dilations in the liver cells [7]. Cd2+ also caused the decrease of respiratory function in the freshwater crab Barytelphusa gureini, gill hyperplasia and degenerative changes in visceral organs, elevation in MDA and attenuation in GSH activity in Oreochromis niloticus [8,9]. Exposure to Cd2+ led to the changes of protein metabolism and energy imbalances with a decrease in tissue glycogen and an elevated haemolymph glucose in snail [10].

A series of toxic symptoms caused by Cd2+ accumulation are associated with oxidant damage, protein misfold, induction and inhibition of enzymes, which are known to trigger some unique signaling cascades from the membrane to the nucleus, being characterized by enhanced gene expression of antioxidant enzymes, detoxification proteins and molecular chaperone, to adapt themselves to Cd2+-contaminated environments [11,12]. Increasing evidences showed that exposure to Cd2+ could induce various cellular responses such as autophagy, apoptosis or necrosis. Autophagic cell death was restrained, but apoptosis was mildly induced in NRK52E cells exposed to Cd2+, which process is regulated by activation of protein kinase C (PKC) [13]. In the renal proximal tubule cells, Cd2+ induced apoptotic cell death and intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) overload is involved in this process [14]. Cd2+ induced autophagy and apoptosis through elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) in MES-13 cells [4]. The above studies have also strongly shown an association between Cd2+ stress and the increase in [Ca2+]c. The [Ca2+]c is tightly controlled by intracellular Ca2+ stores such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria and lysosome, which are also the main sites of autophagic and apoptotic regulation. Phospholipase C (PLC) is a lipid-anchored membrane protein and cleaves phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to form inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 leads to the release of Ca2+ from ER by interacting with IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) which is the main Ca2+-release channels in the ER. DAG, along with Ca2+ signal, induces PKC phosphorylation. At the same time, IP3Rs can transfer Ca2+ to the mitochondria, thereby increasing apoptosis sensitivity and inhibiting basal autophagy. Gu et al. [16] reported that Cd2+ induces Ca2+ release from ER, associated with ER stress through PLC-IP3 signaling pathway. Ca2+-release from the ER ultimately leads to [Ca2+]c elevation and apoptotic death [14].

Sinopotamon henanence, a Crustacea, is widely distributed in the Qinhe rivers in China. As a regional dominant species, it is sensitive to heavy metals and is often used for toxicity assessment in aquatic environments. Previous studies indicated that waterborne Cd2+ pollution causes Cd2+ accumulation in target organs, including the gills, hepatopancreas, antennal gland, and ovary, with the highest level in the gills [17]. Cd2+ induced production of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, metabolic changes and various organs damage in S. henanense [1719]. Additionally, Cd2+ induced cell death in the hepatopancreas and gills [4,20]. Cd2+ significantly increased the [Ca2+]c, Ca2+-ATPase activity, PKC activity and caspase-9/caspase-3 activities, and Ca2+ played key roles in Cd2+-induced apoptosis through a mitochondrial pathway [4,17,21]. However, the source of elevated [Ca2+]c, adaptive responses, and the molecular mechanisms underlying Cd2+-induced cell death are still unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the cellular signaling pathways and physiological responses as induced by Cd2+ in the gill of freshwater crab. This work would provide an important experimental evidence for clarifying DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ signal pathway activated by Cd2+ roles in intracellular protective responses through regulating the expressions of CYP450, BAG3, PDI and HSPs in the early period of stress and cell apoptosis in the late stage of stress.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental animal and treatment

Freshwater crabs, S.henanense, were purchased from the Dongan Aquatic Market in Taiyuan city (Shanxi Province, China). First, healthy male crabs in similar size and weight (18.0 ± 0.5 g) were acclimated for 2 weeks in glass aquaria filled with city tap water (pH 7.5, dechlorinated with dissolved oxygen of 8.0–8.3 mg/L) at the temperature of 20 ± 2℃ and were fed three times a week.

After 2 weeks, the crabs were randomly divided into four equal groups and treated with Cd2+ solution at three sublethal concentrations (14.5, 29 and 58 mg/L) for 96 h, corresponding to 6.25%, 12.5% and 25% of the 96-h LC50, based on the 96 h LC50 of Cd2+ for crabs (232 mg/L) [15], respectively with the tap water as control. In this study, the crabs were denied food, and all other culture conditions were kept as same as those used during the acclimation period.

2.2. Sample preparation

After Cd2+ exposure, second messengers in cells are rapidly generated following activation of membrane receptors. Next, some genes are transcribed and translated through the activation of a series of signaling proteins, such as PKC phosphorylation. Ultimately, the biological effects of the cell, including changes in tissue structure and DNA degradation, are manifested. Therefore, in this experiment, to detect DAG and IP3 contents, the gill tissues were immediately excised from the crabs exposed to Cd2+ for 1, 2, 4 and 8 h. To analyze PKC activity and extract RNA, the gill tissues were excised after the crabs were exposed to Cd2+ for 12, 24 and 48 h. A piece of gill from each individual crab was fixed for histological observation after Cd2+ exposure for 48, 72 and 96 h, and the reminds were used to extract DNA and ATP content measurement. Because the effects of continuous Cd2+ exposure on the histological structure of gills and cell death were found to be concentration-dependent, crabs exposed to 58 mg/L Cd2+ was used in the present study to analyze the cellular signaling pathways activated by Cd² ⁺ , including PKC activation, gene expression, changes in tissue structure and energy, and DNA injury [19,20].

2.3. Measurement of DAG and IP3 contents

DAG and IP3 contents were determined using Elisa Kits from the MLbio Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China) according to corresponding instructions. Tissue pieces were rinsed with ice-cold PBS (0.01M, pH7.4), weighed and then minced into small pieces which were homogenized in PBS (1:9 g:ml) on ice. The homogenates were centrifugated for 10 min at 5000 × g and the supernatants were collected and measured absorbance at 450 nm. The DAG/IP3 amount in each sample was calculated according to the standard curve (y = 2771.8x-118.49 for IP3, y = 9.9582x-0.5996 for DAG, respectively).

2.4. Isolation of gill cell and detection of Ca2+ concentration

Single cell was isolated from the untreated crab gill using trypsin digestion, and then loaded with 5 µM Fluo-3/AM (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for 30 min at 37 ℃ in the dark. After incubation, the suspension cells were washed twice with PBS. Then the cells were treated with 5.8 mg/L Cd2+. Fluorescent probe was excited at 488 nm, and emission fluorescent was filtered at 525 nm. The images were recorded in 60 min with a fluorescence microscopea (Olympus, Japan) and laser confocal microscope (LSM 510 META, Leica, Bensheim, Germany).

2.5. Measurement of PKC activity

PKC activity was measured with PepTag assay kit (Promega Co. USA). The reactive mixture with a final volume of 25 mL consisted of 5 mL reaction buffer, 5 mL PepTag C1 (0.4 mg/mL), 5 mL PKC activator solution, 1 mL peptide protection solution and 9 mL sample. After incubation for 30 min, the reaction was stopped by heating under 95 ℃ for 10 min. SDS PAGE electrophoresis of 0.8% agarose gel at 100 V for 15 min was performed to separate the mixture. After electrophoresis, the bands of phosphorylated PepTag C1 peptide were scanned and the band densities were quantified using the AlphaView analysis software (Fluorchem HD2 Chemilumilescent, Fluorescent and Visible Light Gel Imaging System, Alpha Innotech, USA).

2.6. Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated from gills using TRIzol Reagent (BBI CO., LTD., China). Subsequently, about 1 µg of total RNA were reverse transcribed using random primer p(dN)6 and Maxin reverse transcriptase. And, real-time quantification PCR analysis was performed using the SYBRGreen kit (BBI CO., LTD., China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with following primers (Table 1). The RT-qPCR reaction mixture with a final volume of 20 μL consisted of 10 μL of 2 × SYBR Green Master Mix, 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers, 2 μL of 10 × diluted cDNA template, and water. PCR reactions were performed under the conditions: heating at 95 ℃ for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of heating at 95 ℃ for 5 s and annealing at 60 ℃ for 30 s. Relative expressions were calculated using the 2-(∆∆Ct) method with Rpl38 as the reference gene. Three biological replications with four technical repetitions were performed on each sample.

Table 1. Primer sequences used for real-time PCR analysis.

Gene Forward primer Reverse primer
CYP450 5′-GAACTTCTCAAGGCATTCATCG-3′ 5′-ATTCGGCGGTGTCTTTGAGT-3′
BAG3 5′-CAGATCGAAAGGGTGAGTGG-3′ 5′-TTGCTGATGGCATTGTTGAT-3′
PDI 5′-GAGGGCAAGAGCAAGTATGAA-3′ 5′-ATCATAGTGACCAGCCTCCTTT-3′
HSP21 5′-AGAACCAAGCAGTGTCCCTCA-3′ 5′-CCCACTCTTCTGTTCCACGAT-3′
HSP27 5′-CGAGCAGAAGGAAGGAAACA −3′ 5′-AGCGTTGATGGTCAGCACA −3′
HSP70 5′-ATTTCTACACCTCCGTCACCC-3′ 5′-CTTTGTCCATCTTGGCATCAC-3′
RpL38 5′-ATGACATTCTTCTGCTTATTGGC-3′ 5′-ATGCTTCCCACCTCTTCGTT-3′

2.7. Histological observation

Gill tissues were fixed for 24 h at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde buffer, followed by dehydration with ethanol and toluene in a series gradient and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections with the thick of about 4 µm were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin before observation with a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. DNA-fragmentation assay

DNA injury was analyzed by assessing DNA fragmentation using the DNA purification kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Firstly, 20 mg of the sample was collected. Then the sample was minced and lysed in a lysis buffer containing proteinase K, followed by centrifugation. The mixture was then eluted twice with an elution buffer, and subsequently, DNA was eluted using deionized water or a hydrophilic elution buffer. The eluates containing DNA were separated with the electrophoresis system of 1.5% agarose gel at 100 V for 1 h. DNA bands were visualized and captured by a ultraviolet gel documentation system.

2.9. Determination of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content

Total ATP content was measured based on creatine phosphate generated from ATP and creatine catalyzed by creatine kinase with a ATP assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Bio-Engineering, China). Protein content was determined according to the method reported by Bradford [22] with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

2.10. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 17.0 software. And, results were expressed as means ± SE (n = 3) of three biological replicates per treatment group. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate whether the means were significantly different, taking P < 0.05 as minimally significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cd2+ increased DAG and IP3 contents in S. henanense gill

The contents of DAG and IP3 in the gill were determined after the freshwater crab, S. henanense were exposed to Cd2+ (Fig 1). As shown in Fig 1A, 58 mg/L Cd2+ induced that DAG content increased within 1 h, reached the maximum of 36.5 ng/g after 4 h, and slightly decreased to 28.5 ng/g after 8 h. And as shown in Fig. 1B, the effect of Cd2+ on DAG content was significantly related with its concentration, when Cd2+ increased from 14.5 to 58 mg/L, gill DAG contents increased from 14.8 to 34.1 ng/g. Meanwhile, as it can be seen from Fig 1C and Fig 1D, the IP3 content changed with the same trend as that of DAG. IP3 content significantly increased with the exposure time at the early and peaked at 7.2 ng/g after being exposed for 4 h (Fig 1C), and there was an obvious positive relationship between IP3 content and Cd2+ concentration (Fig 1D). These results supported that Cd2+ exposure induced the increase of DAG and IP3 in S. henanense gill, and the inducing effect was dependent on both Cd2+ exposure time and concentration.

Fig 1. Effects of acute Cd2+ exposure on DAG and IP3 contents in S. henanense gill.

Fig 1

The crabs were treated with 58 mg/L Cd2+ (A, C); or 14.5, 29 and 58 mg/L Cd2+ for 2 h (B, D). Asterisks indicate a significant difference to the control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

3.2. Cd2+ rapidly increased [Ca2+]c in S. henanense gill

Rapid change of [Ca2+]c is an important signal regulating multi biological processes, thus the related change was observed in S. henanense gill exposed to Cd2+ and shown in Fig 2. As shown in Fig 2A, there was almost no fluorescence in the gill cell at the initial exposure, indicated that [Ca2+]c was very low and almost close to zero (Fig 2A). However, combing Fig 2A to Fig 2C, the [Ca2+]c gradually increased during exposure for 0–15 min (Fig 2A-B) but soared at 30 min (Fig 2C). And, according to Fig 2D and Fig 2E, [Ca2+]c obviously reduced (Fig 2D) after 45 min and almost disappeared at 60 min (Fig 2E). Totally, Cd2+ induced the [Ca2+]c rapidly increased in gill cell which only lasted for 30 min. Moreover, with a laser confocal microscope, it was observed that the fluorescence in the cytoplasm extended from the endoplasmic reticulum at cell core to the whole cell after gill cell being exposed to Cd2+ for 15 min (Fig 2F-G). This result further confirmed that Cd2+ induced the rapid increase of [Ca2+]c, and indicated that endoplasmic reticulum might be the source of Ca2+.

Fig 2. Effects of acute Cd2+ exposure on [Ca2+]c in gill cells of S. henanense.

Fig 2

A-E: the fluorescent images (400×); F and G: the laser confocal fluorescent images (F, 400 × ; G, the cell in Fig. 2F magnified by 6 times).

3.3. Cd2+ increased PKC activity in S. henanense gill

PKC, a class of serine/threonine kinases, amplify signal and modulate gene expression in differentiation and proliferation events by phosphorylating a series of transcription factors, such as API transcription factor, NF-κBa transcription factor [2325]. Thus, PKC activity in S. henanense gill exposed to 58 mg/L Cd2+ was analyzed and PKC activity in each group is shown as the increasing multiple compared to control, which has been set as an value of 1 (Fig 3). Cd2+ induced that PKC activity significantly increased, reached to the highest value at 24 h which was about 3.8-fold of control, and then decreased gradually at 48 h. Finally, PKC activity was still signifcanttly higher than that of control (P < 0.01) although there was a gradual decrease.

Fig 3. Effects of Cd2+ exposure on PKC activity in S. henanense gill.

Fig 3

Asterisks indicate a significant difference to the control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

3.4. Cd2+ increased the expression of 6 genes relating with protein-folding

Cd2+ exposure induced the increase of PKC activity in S. henanense gill and enlightened us to consider if the increase of PKC activity trigger downstream signal pathway, such as the expression of the genes relating with protein-folding. So the expression of 6 genes in S. henanense gill exposed to 58 mg/L Cd2+ were quantified by qRT-PCR method, which relate with protein-folding including Cytochrome P450 (CYP450), BAG regulator 3 (BAG3), protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), heat shock protein 21 (Hsp21), heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) (Fig 4). The expression of 6 genes changed in a similar trend, which continuously climbed when the S. henanense was exposed to Cd2+ for 0–24 h and then gradually decreased. Exposure to Cd2+ for 24 h raised the expression of CYP450, BAG3, PDI, Hsp21, Hsp27 and Hsp70 by 4.9, 3.7, 3.1, 2.3, 2.9, 2.3 times (P < 0.01), respectively. And, at the final of the exposure, the expression of 6 genes in S. henanense gill were still obviously higher than that of control, although which gradually decreased form the peak value. Notably, we found that the change of the expression of the 6 genes was consistent with that of PKC activity when combing Fig 3 and Fig 4. This indicated that Cd2+ exposure induced the increase of PKC activity in S. henanense gill, which might trigger the expression of genes relating with protein-folding in turn.

Fig 4. Effects of Cd2+ exposure on genes expression in the gill of S. henanense.

Fig 4

Crabs were treated with 58 mg/L Cd2+ for 0, 12, 24, 48h. Asterisks indicate a significant difference to the control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

3.5. Cd2+ destructed the structure of S.henanense gill

The gill lamellae of S. henanense consisted of cuticle, epithelial cells and gill cavity. Here, these three tissues in S.henanense exposed to 58 mg/L Cd2+ were observed (Fig 5A-D). As Fig 5A displayed, the flat slender gill filaments, narrow gill cavity and more epidermal cells at the junction between the upper and lower wall in gill lamellae were observed in the control group, and the nuclei of epidermal cells was round or oval dyed with hematoxylin. However, Cd2+ exposure destroyed gill filament structure and cause the cell death (Fig 5B-D). After exposure for 48 h, gill filament was irregularly thickened, gill cavity was enlarged, and some epidermal cells at the junction disappeared while some small and irregular residual body appeared (labeled with red triangle in Fig 5B). After 72 and 96 h, the gill filament was further damaged culminating in their breakdown (yellow asterisk in Fig 5C-D), and more epidermal cells disappeared (red arrow in Fig 5C-D).

Fig 5. Effects of Cd2+ exposure on gill of S. henanense.

Fig 5

A-D: HE-stained gill section, 600 × ; A: control; B: exposure to Cd2+ for 48 h; C: exposure to Cd2+ for 72 h. D: exposure to Cd2+ for 96 h. (Co: connection of gill lamellae; GC: gill cavity; GL: gill lamellae; red triangle: small and irregular residual body; yellow asterisk: broken gill filaments; red arrow: disappeared cells).

3.6. Cd2+ degraded DNA and decreased ATP content

The DNA integrity and ATP level (Fig 6A-B)showed that DNA was intact in the control (0 h), but obviously degraded to ladder after being exposed to Cd2+ for 48 h and completely dispersed after 96 h. As Fig 6B displayed, Cd2+ exposure decreased ATP level from 387 to 189 µmol/g.

Fig 6. Effects of Cd2+ exposure on DNA integrity and ATP level in S. henanense gill.

Fig 6

A: DNA fragmentation of gill cells (Mr: DNA marker); B: ATP level (n = 3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

4. Discussion

4.1. DAG-PKC and IP3-Ca2+ signaling pathway

Cd2+ is a highly toxic metal that cause oxidative damage, metabolic disorders, and dysfunction in aquatic organisms. However, complex special signaling might be activated in Cd2+-resisting species to resist Cd2+ and reduce its toxicity. DAG and IP3 are two important intracellular signaling molecules, which are catalyzed by PLC. IP3Rs located on the ER are activated in response to IP3, which leads to the release of Ca2+ from ER and triggers Ca2+ signal pathway. Ca2+ is a versatile and dynamic second messenger that regulates biological processes through rapid change of [Ca2+]c, including secretion, motility, apoptosis and autophagy [26,27]. The generation of DAG and IP3 and the following elevated [Ca2+]c promote the binding of Ca2+ to PKC and translocation from cytoplasm to cell membrane, where PKC is activated by DAG [28]. Actived PKC phosphorylate various transcription factors, such as API and NF-κB, modulating gene expression during differentiation and proliferation events, also phosphorylates other signal-transducing kinases, such as S6 kinase and Raf kinase, participating in translation process and mitogenesis [2325]. In resting conditions, many cells display a constitutively low level of DAG/IP3-mediated signaling. Lawal et al. [26] reported that intracellular Ca2+ levels increased significantly in HEK 293 cells after being exposed to Cd2+ for 24h. Cd2+-elevated [Ca2+]c were mainly originated from IP3R-mediated ER which released Ca2+, but not from extracellular medium. U73122, the PLC-specific inhibitor, prevented the Cd2+-dependent increase in Ca2+ level and abolished Cd2+-dependent caspase 3 activation as well as apoptosis [29]. Moreover, in Cd2+-treated rPT cells, elevations of [Ca2+]c and mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration with depletion of ER Ca2+ levels occurred at the same time. Cytosolic Ca2+ overload originated from IP3R-mediated ER Ca2+ release has a negative impact on Cd2+ nephrotoxicity through its promotion of apoptosis [14]. Previous experiments supported that Cd2+ induced elevation of [Ca2+]c and participated in the process of gill cell apoptosis in S.henanense by regulating the activities of caspase 9 and caspase 3, but source of Ca2+ in stress and its upstream signal moleculars are still unclear [21]. In this study, Cd2+ increased the contents of both DAG and IP3 in gill tissue at the early state of stress (1 ~ 8 h), and induced the rapid change of [Ca2+]c. Both DAG and IP₃ are transient metabolites produced by PIP₂ hydrolysis. After activating the signaling pathway, IP₃ will be converted into inactive IP₂ and IP₁ through dephosphorylated by phosphatases, and DAG will either be phosphorylated to form phosphatidic acid (PA) or hydrolyzed by lipases into glycerol and fatty acids, thus becoming inactivated. Therefore, the contents of DAG and IP₃ reach their peaks at 4 h after Cd2+ exposure and then gradually decrease.

Elevated IP3 level and figure of Ca2+ sparking based on laser confocal microscope (Fig 2G) clearly confirmed that Cd2+-induced IP3-mediated ER Ca2+ pool release Ca2+. At 15 min of Cd2+ exposure, Ca2+ are rapidly released from ER into cytoplasm, resulting in the increase of [Ca2+]c. After 45 min of stress, Ca2+ is transported out of the cytoplasm by active Ca2+-ATPase, completing the rapid change of [Ca2+]c and the downward transmission of signals in a short time [17,21]). The shuttle of intracellular Ca2+ between the cytoplasm and the major Ca2+ stores trigger signaling cascades. Further result proved that PKC was activated continuously during 12 ~ 48 h exposure to Cd2+. A prolonged activation of PKC was also occurred at 96 h in the hepatopancreas of the Cd2+-treated crab [17]. The DAG-PKC and IP3-Ca2+ signaling pathway was activated to initiate S.henanense to response Cd2+ stress.

4.2. Gene expression

Cd2+ activates above signal pathways, initiating an adaptive response of the cell and generating multiple biological effects. Expression profile analysis demonstrated that mRNA levels of detoxification-related proteins (glutathione S-transferase and metallothionein isoform), anti-oxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase), metabolism enzyme (lactate dehydrogenase), ATP synthesis-related enzymes (cytochrome c oxidase subunit, mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit ε, cytochrome bc1 complex subunit) were up-regulated by Cd2+ [17,30,31]. Cd2+ usually destruct protein structure, resulting in a collection of denatured proteins, which, in turn, would stimulate the expression of chaperone proteins to repair the misfolded proteins or to eliminate the aggregated proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome system [32]. But gene expressions of folding-related protein in gill is still unknown in S.henanense exposed to Cd2+ stress. CYP450 system, the most important toxicant metabolizing enzyme families, catalyze the metabolism of various toxic substances, convert them into non-toxic metabolites [33]. Ninety percent of exogenous poisons are chiefly metabolized and detoxified via CYP450 [34]. PDI is located in the ER cavity and catalyze the formation, reduction and isomerisation of disulfide bonds between appropriate cysteine residues, which is essential for correct folding, stability of many proteins. Moreover, PDI, as a molecular chaperone, has the ability to bind to polypeptide chains, increasing the yield of correctly folded proteins [3]. Hsps are chaperones highly conserved across species that are constitutively expressed facilitating the folding, transport and assembly of polypeptides. Different stress conditions further induce their expression, maintaining protein integrity and correcting protein folding in the cell [35,36]. Hsp27 aids in refolding of nonnative proteins, preventing their non-specific aggregation and allowing them to be subsequently restored to their native structure in co-operation with ATP-dependent Hsp70 [37]. Hsp27 may be phosphorylated by PKCδ isoform after exposure to stress, followed by a subsequent increase in the expression levels of the protein within several hours [37]. BAG3, a co-chaperone, modulates ATP turnover and the protein folding activity of Hsp70 [38]. And it also interacts with HspB and acts as a scaffold that links Hsp70 with HspB, regulating degradation of ubiquitinated proteins via the proteasome and autophagy pathways [39]. Wang et al. [33] reported that Cd2+ could affect the activity of CYP450 enzyme and gene expression in liver injury. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed that the over-expression of a PDI isoform in gills of Eriocheir sinensis chronically exposed to Cd2+ could protect and/or repair target proteins and reduce the toxicity of the metal [3]. Expression of Hsp70 in hepatopancreas of crab were significantly induced by Cd2+ [30]. Acute exposure to Cd2+ upregulated Hsp27 and Hsp70 in transcription levels while lightly influenced the expression level of Hsp21 in the aquatic midge [36]. Hsp70 expression was up-regulated when bivalve mollusks were exposed to low concentrations of metals [35]. Expression of Hsps is associated with the concentration and the duration of Cd2+ and cell types. In this study, the Cd2+ treatment increased CYP450, PDI, BAG3, Hsp21, Hsp27 and Hsp70 transcription levels in gill of S.henanense. PDI transcript activation indicated that Cd2+ induced ER stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR). And the increasing of PDI expression improved the synthesis and folding of proteins in rER, reduced the Cd2+-induced cytotoxicity and was benifit to cell survival. The up-regulation of CYP450 and chaperones not only involve in protein folding but also are required to activate autophagy to degrade proteotoxic peptides, which were confirmed by the appearance of autolysosomes and the genes up-regulation involved in phagocytosis [4,30,40].

The ability of Hsp27 to aid the recovery of stress-induced denaturation of proteins may increase the survival rate of cells by limiting the levels of misfolded proteins. Hsp27-mediated activation of Akt is likely to contribute to increase the resistance to reduce apoptosis. Hsp27 negatively regulates the activation of pro-caspase-9 by interacting with cytochrome c, thus preventing the correct formation/function of the apoptosome complex [37]. Induced Hsp70 affects apoptosis at various levels through inhibiting caspase activation by interfering with Apaf-1 and preventing the recruitment of procaspase-9 to the apoptosome. Hsp70 also increases Bcl-2 expression and inhibits cytochrome C release [41]. Without doubt the expressions of CYP450, PDI, BAG3, Hsp21, Hsp27 and Hsp70 serve as a protective mechanism to increase cellular survival during times of Cd2+ stress. The up-regulation of these genes transcriptions avoids protein misfolding and dysfunction in the stress response, while their expression decrease has been described as a possible mechanism in the cell damage or death. Cd2+ induced Aβ and phosphorylated Tau proteins generation, mediated partially by Hsp27 and Hsp70 disruption, leading to cell death in SN56 cholinergic neurons [42]. If excessive amounts of damaged proteins are present, they would form larger aggregates which serve as the signal for the induction of apoptosis [37]. Cd2+ led to apparent distension, twisting and fracture of rER [4]. A large number of ribosomes were detached from the surface of the rER, which is is the main reason contributing to the gradual decrease in the expression level of several genes (CYP450, PDI, BAG, Hsp27, and Hsp70) after 48 h.

4.3. Histological damage and cell death

Cd2+ causes pathological change in gills including thickened gill filament and enlarged gill cavity. Apical microvilli of the epithelial cells separated from the cuticle and bent, indicating that the structure of microvilli was damaged and respiratory function of gill damaged obviously. Cao et al. [43] reported that Cd2+ disrupted tight junctions of lung epithelial cells, impairing epithelial barrier function, which is due to the PKC hyperphosphorylation on the connective proteins. The ultrastructure of gill further showed that the expansion of the gill cavity is closely related to the death of epidermal cells at the junction sites of the upper and lower monolayer cell [19]. After be exposeding to Cd2+ for 48 h, nuclear of some epithelial cells in gill shrunk, became smaller and even disappeared (Fig 5B), and DNA was regularly degraded (Fig 6A), which were characteristic hallmarks of apoptosis. The apoptotic progress was accompanied by the decrease of the expression of the DPI, BAG3, Hsp27 and Hsp70. When the fresh crabs were exposed to Cd2+, in high concentration, due to the decrease of detoxifying protein such as DPI, BAG3 and Hsps, as well as the accumulation of denatured protein, cells were unable to repair the damage caused by Cd2+ and initiated apoptosis pathways such as mitochondrial pathways, activating caspases and causing cell apoptosis. This result has also been proven by previous studies that acute Cd2+ exposure activated Ca2+ signal pathway including the increases of [Ca2+]c, CaM content and Ca2+-ATPase activity, and triggered caspases-dependent cell apoptosis [21]. Apoptosis minizes damage to surrounding tissues through cleaning damaged cells, which is a self-protection mechanism and plays a crucial role in organism homeostasis and adaption to adverse stress conditions [44].

4.4. ATP disruption

There is an overlap between apoptosis and necrosis in Cd2+-induced cell death in gill. However, the main internal factors that determine the mode of cell death when subjected to Cd2+ stress are not yet understood. One evident physiological difference in cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis is the intracellular levels of ATP [45]. Cd2+ induces either apoptosis or necrosis in rat cortical neurons, depending on the Cd2+ concentration [46]. Cd2+ concentrations which activated caspase-3 and induced apoptosis in cortical neurons did not influence the intracellular ATP level; however, higher Cd2+ concentration (10 µM) lead to both a total depletion of the intracellular ATP level and necrosis, but did not increase caspase-3 activity [46]. Mitochondria is the primary energy-generating system in most eukaryotic cells, in which 95% of the energy is synthesized. The integrity of inner membrane, ATP synthase with suitable activity and complete electron transport chain in inner membrane are necessary for energy synthesis. In additional, the intermembrane space of mitochondria maintain the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), avoiding opening of the permeability transition pore and the release of cytochrome c. Mitochondrias participate in calcium signaling and apoptosis, and their function are essential for the viability of cells. In HK-2 cell, CdCl2 caused mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction, the decrease of both ATP content and mitochondrial membrane potential [47]. In the gills of Eriocheir sinensis exposed to Cd2+, mitochondria was broken, and some enzymes involving in ATP supply were down-regulated, including GAPDH, malate dehydrogenase, ATP synthase beta and arginine kinase [3]. Mitochondrial respiration was inhibited by 30%, ATP turnover was reduced, substrate oxidation was impaired when rainbow trout was exposed to Cd2+ [48]. Also, the necrosis induced by Cd2+ which was accompanied by ATP disruption has been found in several cell types [18,46]. In this experiment, Cd2+ exposure for 48 h induced cell apoptosis and decreased ATP level by 15%. After 96 h, Cd2+ exposure caused necrosis of gill cells and decreased ATP content by 51%. Mitochondria destruction, ATP deletion, and accumulation of misfolded proteins were the keys to cell death. Intracellular energy levels and mitochondrial function are rapidly compromised in necrosis, but not in apoptosis [49]. This may be related to the occurrence of massive cell death during the necrosis process.

4.5. Cd2+-activated signal pathway

Summing up previous study and our study, we thought Cd2+-stimulated PLC activation led to the decomposition of PIP2 into DAG and IP3, double signal moleculars. The combination of IP3 in the cytoplasm and IP3 receptor (IP3R) on the rER by diffusion opened the Ca2+ channel, promoting Ca2+ in the ER to flow into the cytoplasm along the concentration gradient, which switch on Ca2+ signal pathway in cytoplasmic. In the early stages of Cd2+ exposure(< 48 h), interaction of Ca2+ with DAG activates PKC, by which active PKC phosphorylates transcription factors API or NF-κB, or activates S6 kinase or Raf kinase, promoting the gene expressions of detoxification-related proteins including BAG3, Hsps, CYP450 and DPI at transcription level, and cell survival. In the middle stages of Cd2+ exposure (48 h-72 h), Ca2+-CaM activate the caspase cascade system through the mitochondrial pathway, leading to DNA degradation and cell apoptosis. In the later stages of Cd2+ exposure (>72 h), due to the destruction of membrane structure and the reduction of enzyme activity, the ability of mitochondria to synthesize ATP is sharply reduced. Low ATP content and the accumulation of a large number of misfolded proteins in cells cannot maintain a series of metabolic activities, at last a large number of cells undergo necrosis (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Signaling cascades in gill of S.henanense induced by Cd2+.

Fig 7

(rER: rough endoplasmic reticulum, Mt: mitochondria, Cytc: cytochrome c).

5. Conclusions

In this study, we proved that Cd2+ exposure firstly triggered DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and promoted gene expression relating protein-folding. Moreover, based on histological observation and DNA electrophoresis, Cd2+ exposure induced the cell injury and apoptosis in S. henanense gill at 48h, and caused cell necrosis accompanied by a rapid decrease in ATP at 96 h. Destruction of DNA and decrease of ATP might be the key events in the processes of cell apoptosis and necrosis. This study provided more information to know the signaling events underlying Cd2+-induced cytotoxicity.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Experimental data.

(XLS)

pone.0336415.s001.xls (35.5KB, xls)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (201701D121084 to JW), the Applied Basic Research Project of Datong City (2022053 to JL), and the Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths (20240302121202 to JY).

References

  • 1.Zhang Y, Yang DD, Lu ZL. Introduction and reflection of cadmium pollution accident occurred in Longjiang river of Guangxi Province. Chinese Journal of Chemical Education. 2013;(6):1–2, 13. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mahar A, Wang P, Li R, Zhang Z. Immobilization of Lead and Cadmium in Contaminated Soil Using Amendments: A Review. Pedosphere. 2015;25(4):555–68. doi: 10.1016/s1002-0160(15)30036-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silvestre F, Dierick J-F, Dumont V, Dieu M, Raes M, Devos P. Differential protein expression profiles in anterior gills of Eriocheir sinensis during acclimation to cadmium. Aquat Toxicol. 2006;76(1):46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu D, Yang J, Wang L. Cadmium induces ultrastructural changes in the hepatopancreas of the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense. Micron. 2013;47:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2013.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ma D, Hou Y, Du L, Li N, Xuan R, Wang F, et al. Oxidative damages and ultrastructural changes in the sperm of freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense exposed to cadmium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;98:244–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu H, Xuan R, Li Y, Zhang X, Wang Q, Wang L. Effects of cadmium exposure on digestive enzymes, antioxidant enzymes, and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013;20(6):4085–92. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1362-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Noor Z, Khan SA, Noor M. Assessment of cadmium toxicity and its possible effects on goldfish (Carassius auratus), employing microscopy and biochemical techniques. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83(12):1441–9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siddiqui AA. Respiratory response and hemolymph sugar level of the crab, Barytelphusa gureini exposed to cadmium chloride. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2015;5(3):71–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abu-Elala NM, Shaalan M, Ali SE, Younis NA. Immune responses and protective efficacy of diet supplementation with selenium nanoparticles against cadmium toxicity in Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac Res. 2021;52(8):3677–86. doi: 10.1111/are.15212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Q, Liang Y, Gao N, Gao J, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Regulation of lipid droplets via the PLCβ2-PKCα-ADRP pathway in granulosa cells exposed to cadmium. Environ Pollut. 2020;267:115541. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Q, Wang X, Wang X, Yang H, Liu B. Analysis of metallotionein expression and antioxidant enzyme activities in Meretrix meretrix larvae under sublethal cadmium exposure. Aquat Toxicol. 2010;100(4):321–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El-Sayed YS, El-Gazzar AM, El-Nahas AF, Ashry KM. Vitamin C modulates cadmium-induced hepatic antioxidants’ gene transcripts and toxicopathic changes in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(2):1664–70. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5412-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.So K-Y, Oh S-H. Cadmium-induced heme-oxygenase-1 expression plays dual roles in autophagy and apoptosis and is regulated by both PKC-δ and PKB/Akt activation in NRK52E kidney cells. Toxicology. 2016;370:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2016.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu F, Li Z-F, Wang Z-Y, Wang L. Role of subcellular calcium redistribution in regulating apoptosis and autophagy in cadmium-exposed primary rat proximal tubular cells. J Inorg Biochem. 2016;164:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang SH, Shih YL, Ko WC, Wei YH, Shih CM. Cadmium-induced autophagy and apoptosis are mediated by a calcium signaling pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(22):3640–52. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8383-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gu J, Dai S, Liu Y, Liu H, Zhang Y, Ji X, et al. Activation of Ca2+-sensing receptor as a protective pathway to reduce Cadmium-induced cytotoxicity in renal proximal tubular cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19327-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li R, Zhou Y, Wang L, Ren G. Low-molecular-weight-chitosan ameliorates cadmium-induced toxicity in the freshwater crab, Sinopotamon yangtsekiense. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011;74(5):1164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xuan R, Wu H, Lin C, Ma D, Li Y, Xu T, et al. Oxygen consumption and metabolic responses of freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense to acute and sub-chronic cadmium exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;89:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang J, Zhang P, Shen Q, Wang Q, Liu D, Li J, et al. The effects of cadmium exposure on the oxidative state and cell death in the gill of freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J, Wang Q, Li J, Shen Q, Wang F, Wang L. Cadmium induces hydrogen peroxide production and initiates hydrogen peroxide-dependent apoptosis in the gill of freshwater crab, Sinopotamon henanense. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012;156(3–4):195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2012.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang J, Zhang P, Liu N, Wang Q, Luo J, Wang L. Cadmium Induces Apoptosis in Freshwater Crab Sinopotamon henanense through Activating Calcium Signal Transduction Pathway. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li RC, Ping P, Zhang J, Wead WB, Cao X, Gao J, et al. PKCepsilon modulates NF-kappaB and AP-1 via mitogen-activated protein kinases in adult rabbit cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279(4):H1679–89. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.4.H1679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xiangyang W, Huitu L. Effect of PKCα on the gene expression related with proliferation and activity of transcription factor AP-1. ChinSciBull. 1997;42(23):1986–9. doi: 10.1007/bf02883200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morley SJ, Dever TE, Etchison D, Traugh JA. Phosphorylation of eIF-4F by protein kinase C or multipotential S6 kinase stimulates protein synthesis at initiation. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(8):4669–72. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)67700-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lawal AO, Ellis EM. Phospholipase C mediates cadmium-dependent apoptosis in HEK 293 cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;110(6):510–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00843.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bustos G, Cruz P, Lovy A, Cárdenas C. Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria Calcium Communication and the Regulation of Mitochondrial Metabolism in Cancer: A Novel Potential Target. Front Oncol. 2017;7:199. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hug H, Sarre TF. Protein kinase C isoenzymes: divergence in signal transduction? Biochemical Journal. 1993;291(2):329–43. doi: 10.1042/bj2910329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lawal AO, Ellis EM. Phospholipase C mediates cadmium‐dependent apoptosis in HEK 293 cells. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;110(6):510–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00843.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun M, Ting Li Y, Liu Y, Chin Lee S, Wang L. Transcriptome assembly and expression profiling of molecular responses to cadmium toxicity in hepatopancreas of the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19405. doi: 10.1038/srep19405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xuan R, Wu H, Li Y, Wang J, Wang L. Sublethal Cd-induced cellular damage and metabolic changes in the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(3):1738–45. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2068-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yu X, Hong S, Faustman EM. Cadmium-induced activation of stress signaling pathways, disruption of ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation and apoptosis in primary rat Sertoli cell-gonocyte cocultures. Toxicol Sci. 2008;104(2):385–96. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang H, Han Q, Chen Y, Hu G, Xing H. Novel insights into cytochrome P450 enzyme and solute carrier families in cadmium-induced liver injury of pigs. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;211:111910. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cong Y, Chi Q, Teng X, Li S. The Protection of Selenium Against Cadmium-Induced Mitochondrial Damage via the Cytochrome P450 in the Livers of Chicken. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;190(2):484–92. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1557-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Taylor DA, Thompson EL, Nair SV, Raftos DA. Differential effects of metal contamination on the transcript expression of immune- and stress-response genes in the Sydney Rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata. Environ Pollut. 2013;178:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martín-Folgar R, Martínez-Guitarte J-L. Cadmium alters the expression of small heat shock protein genes in the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius. Chemosphere. 2017;169:485–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Concannon CG, Gorman AM, Samali A. On the role of Hsp27 in regulating apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2003;8(1):61–70. doi: 10.1023/a:1021601103096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rauch JN, Zuiderweg ERP, Gestwicki JE. Non-canonical Interactions between Heat Shock Cognate Protein 70 (Hsc70) and Bcl2-associated Anthanogene (BAG) Co-Chaperones Are Important for Client Release. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(38):19848–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.742502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Judge LM, Perez-Bermejo JA, Truong A, Ribeiro AJ, Yoo JC, Jensen CL, et al. A BAG3 chaperone complex maintains cardiomyocyte function during proteotoxic stress. JCI Insight. 2017;2(14):e94623. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.94623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang C, Wang X, Pi S, Wei Z, Wang C, Yang F, et al. Cadmium and molybdenum co-exposure triggers autophagy via CYP450s/ROS pathway in duck renal tubular epithelial cells. Sci Total Environ. 2021;759:143570. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krause M, Heck TG, Bittencourt A, Scomazzon SP, Newsholme P, Curi R, et al. The chaperone balance hypothesis: the importance of the extracellular to intracellular HSP70 ratio to inflammation-driven type 2 diabetes, the effect of exercise, and the implications for clinical management. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:249205. doi: 10.1155/2015/249205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moyano P, García JM, Lobo M, Anadón MJ, Sola E, Pelayo A, et al. Cadmium alters heat shock protein pathways in SN56 cholinergic neurons, leading to Aβ and phosphorylated Tau protein generation and cell death. Food Chem Toxicol. 2018;121:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cao X, Lin H, Muskhelishvili L, Latendresse J, Richter P, Heflich RH. Tight junction disruption by cadmium in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Respir Res. 2015;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0191-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.D’Arcy MS. Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int. 2019;43(6):582–92. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eguchi Y, Shimizu S, Tsujimoto Y. Intracellular ATP levels determine cell death fate by apoptosis or necrosis. Cancer Res. 1997;57(10):1835–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.López E, Figueroa S, Oset-Gasque MJ, González MP. Apoptosis and necrosis: two distinct events induced by cadmium in cortical neurons in culture. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138(5):901–11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang Y, Chi H, Xu F, He Z, Li Z, Wu F, et al. Cadmium chloride-induced apoptosis of HK-2 cells via interfering with mitochondrial respiratory chain. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;236:113494. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Adiele RC, Stevens D, Kamunde C. Cadmium- and calcium-mediated toxicity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in vivo: interactions on fitness and mitochondrial endpoints. Chemosphere. 2011;85(10):1604–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nicotera P, Leist M, Ferrando-May E. Intracellular ATP, a switch in the decision between apoptosis and necrosis. Toxicol Lett. 1998;102–103:139–42. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00298-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mei Li

31 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Yang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 14 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols....

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mei Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“The work was supported by the Basic Research Program Project of Shanxi Province (20210302124068); Research Funding Project for Returned Overseas Students of Shanxi Province (2021-145), and Applied Basic Research Project of Datong (2022053); Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths [Project ID: 20240302121202].”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and in Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

6. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

7. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors investigated Cd-induced DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and cell injury in gill of freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense. The authors systematically designed the work by performing some valuable experimental works accordingly. It is also necessary to evaluate new data critically and not make hasty conclusions that may lead to misinterpretations. However, several important points must be addressed before publication in this journal. Also, the authors need to address all points in the revision stage for a broad range of readers' understanding.

Specific comments:

1. The introduction mentions the toxicity of cadmium and its association with organ injury, but does not specify the exposure levels of Cd in the aquatic environment. It is recommended to add "the current exposure levels of cadmium in the aquatic environment" to highlight the scientific value of this study.

2. The introduction should explain the reason for choosing the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense, such as "this species is a regional dominant species, sensitive to heavy metals, and is often used for toxicity assessment in aquatic environments." to enhance the rationality of the experimental design.

3. The exposure concentrations (14.5, 29, 58 mg/L) and duration (4 d) set in the Materials and Methods lack justification. It needs to be clarified whether the concentrations refer to the actual pollution levels in the environment (such as the measured concentration range of cadmium-contaminated water bodies) or preliminary experimental results.

4. In the preparation of samples on page 5, line 88 of the main text, explain why the exposure time of DAG, IP3, PKC, RNA, and histological observation for each indicator detecting Cd in the samples is different, and provide an explanation in the original text to enhance the rationality of the experimental design.

5. Is a sample size of (n=3) reasonable in the statistical analysis on page 7, line 137 of the main text? Please verify.

6. The conclusion in the main text should be cautious. The study measured the destruction of DNA and decrease of ATP as two indicators, but did not detect the genes related to apoptosis and necrosis pathways at the gene or protein level, and the evidence is insufficient.

7. Please note the language modifications, for example, the ℃ for line 117 is not Times New Roman; there are errors in the references in line 252, etc.

8. Please improve the clarity of the images and the aesthetics of the layout. The layout of Figure 2 is not very attractive; please reformat it. Figure 3 only has one image; it is recommended to combine it with other suitable images. In Figure 5A, the arrow marking for GC was not found. Additionally, the markings for Co and GL are not very clear; it is suggested to change the font color for better readability. It is recommended to explain the meaning of the triangle in the B/C/D images and the red arrows in the notes for Figure 5. In Figure 6, the B image does not indicate statistical differences, and the concentration of Cd2+ treatment is also not marked.

Reviewer #2: This study investigates the toxicological effects of cadmium (Cd²⁺) exposure in freshwater crabs (Sinopotamon henanense), with a particular focus on the underlying signaling pathways involved. Crabs were exposed to Cd²⁺ concentrations of 0, 14.5, 29, and 58 mg/L for four days. The results showed that Cd²⁺ exposure activates both the DAG–PKC and IP3–Ca²⁺ signaling pathways in gill tissue, as evidenced by elevated cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ levels and increased PKC activity. Furthermore, Cd²⁺ exposure also upregulated six stress-related genes (CYP450, BAG3, PDI, Hsp21, Hsp27, and Hsp70), suggesting involvement in detoxification and protein folding. Histological analysis revealed gill damage, including filament swelling and epidermal cell death. Additionally, DNA fragmentation and reduced ATP content were observed, potentially contributing to apoptosis and necrosis.

In conclusion, this study provides mechanistic insights into Cd²⁺-induced cellular injury in aquatic invertebrates, highlighting dual-pathway activation, oxidative stress, and disrupted energy metabolism as key contributors. The findings enhance our understanding of cadmium toxicity in freshwater ecosystems and support the study’s relevance to the scope of PLoS ONE. However, the manuscript requires substantial revisions prior to consideration for publication.

Specific comments and suggestions are as follows:

1. The final paragraph of the Introduction should be strengthened by clearly outlining the main objectives and emphasizing its scientific relevance. A more explicit statement of purpose will help readers appreciate the study’s contribution to the field of aquatic toxicology.

2. Important methodological details are missing in the Materials and Methods section. Please specify the number of biological replicates per treatment group, clarify whether n = 3 refers to biological or technical replicates, and provide details on DNA extraction and sample preservation protocols. Additionally, indicate whether normality assumptions (e.g., via Shapiro–Wilk tests) were tested prior to applying one-way ANOVA. The use of standard error (SE) rather than standard deviation (SD) to represent variability should also be justified.

3. The legend for Figure 3 incorrectly includes the description for Figure 4. Please revise to ensure that each figure legend accurately corresponds to its respective figure.

4. The primer sequences used for qPCR were not provide. These should be included in a supplementary table to ensure transparency and allow reproducibility.

5. The rationale for selecting 58 mg/L Cd²⁺ for qPCR and histological analyses is unclear. Please clarify whether this concentration was chosen based on observed toxicity, environmental relevance, or previous literature?

6. At 8 hours, both DAG and IP3 levels declined following initial elevation. This pattern warrants further discussion—could it be reflect negative feedback regulation or cellular adaptation? Similarly, the observed downregulation of several genes (PDI, BAG, Hsp27, and Hsp70) at 48 hours should be discussed to better contextualize these transcriptional responses and their implications for Cd²⁺-induced stress mechanisms.

7. In Section 3.5, the current HE-stained images lack sufficient resolution and clarity. Higher-magnification, better-focused images are recommended to improve visualization of pathological changes in gill tissues.

8. Although the Discussion provides a detailed narrative, it lacks clear structure and thematic focus. Introducing subheadings such as “Oxidative Stress,” “Gene Expression,” and “Histological Damage”would improve readability and organization. A more concise and logically structured synthesis of the proposed toxicological mechanisms would further strengthen this section.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy..-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2026 Apr 22;21(4):e0336415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336415.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


25 Sep 2025

Dr. Jinxiang Wang

College of Agriculture and Life Science,

Shanxi Datong University,

1 Xingyun Street, Datong, Shanxi, 037006

CHINA

Email: wangjx11@163.com

Dear Dr. editor

Thank you very much to send us the useful comments. We have carefully revised our manuscript entitled "Cadmium-induced DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and cell injury in gill of freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense " following the comments provided by the reviewer and editor. Details on the revisions are listed below. Thank you very much again for considering our manuscript. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. We’re looking forward to further news from you.

Reviewer # 1: Review PLOS One

Ms number: PONE-D-25-30435R1

The authors investigated Cd-induced DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and cell injury in gill of freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense. The authors systematically designed the work by performing some valuable experimental works accordingly. It is also necessary to evaluate new data critically and not make hasty conclusions that may lead to misinterpretations. However, several important points must be addressed before publication in this journal. Also, the authors need to address all points in the revision stage for a broad range of readers' understanding.

Specific comments:

1. The introduction mentions the toxicity of cadmium and its association with organ injury, but does not specify the exposure levels of Cd in the aquatic environment. It is recommended to add "the current exposure levels of cadmium in the aquatic environment" to highlight the scientific value of this study.

Answer: Due to the thriving coal mining, coking plant, iron, steel, and chemical industries, highly toxic Cd2+ have been frequently detected in rivers, estuaries, and near-shore waters. During the heavy metal pollution incident in Longjiang, Guangxi, China in 2012, Cd2+ concentration in the water reached a peak that exceeded the standard by 80 times, and the length of the river section where Cd2+ concentration exceeded the standard by more than 5 times was 100 kilometers. We added the above descriptions to introduction (1th paragraph).

2. The introduction should explain the reason for choosing the freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense, such as "this species is a regional dominant species, sensitive to heavy metals, and is often used for toxicity assessment in aquatic environments." to enhance the rationality of the experimental design.

Answer: Thank you for your kind suggestion. We added the above descriptions to introduction (3th paragraph).

3. The exposure concentrations (14.5, 29, 58 mg/L) and duration (4 d) set in the Materials and Methods lack justification. It needs to be clarified whether the concentrations refer to the actual pollution levels in the environment (such as the measured concentration range of cadmium-contaminated water bodies) or preliminary experimental results.

Answer: In our previous studies, we found that the 96 h LC50 value of cadmium to S. henanense is 232 mg/L for adult male crabs with a homogeneous weight (20.0±0.5g) (Wang et al., Chemosphere 2008). Considering the serious deterioration of the ecological environment, we choose relatively high Cd2+ concentrations of 14.5, 29 and 58 mg/L, consulting the 96h LC50 for Cd2+ to S. henanense. We added the above descriptions to material and methods (5th paragraph)

4.In the preparation of samples on page 5, line 88 of the main text, explain why the exposure time of DAG, IP3, PKC, RNA, and histological observation for each indicator detecting Cd in the samples is different, and provide an explanation in the original text to enhance the rationality of the experimental design.

Answer: After Cd2+ exposure, second messengers in cells are rapidly generated following activation of membrane receptors. Next, some genes are transcribed and translated through the activation of a series of signaling proteins, such as PKC phosphorylation. Ultimately, the biological effects of the cell, including changes in tissue structure and DNA degradation, are manifested. Therefore, in this experiment, DAG and IP3 were detected in the early stage of the experiment (1–8 h), PKC and RNA transcription were detected at 12–48 h, while observations of tissue structure, DNA integrity, and ATP content were detected at 48–96 h, respectively. We added the above descriptions to sample preparation.

5. Is a sample size of (n=3) reasonable in the statistical analysis on page 7, line 137 of the main text? Please verify.

Answer: In biostatistics, the requirement for sample size in analysis of variance (ANOVA) must be comprehensively determined based on the type of experimental design, data variability, effect size, and statistical power. The core objective is to ensure the results have statistical reliability and biological significance. For one-way ANOVA, the sample size per group can be relatively small, and the determination of sample size should focus on “whether the true differences between groups can be accurately detected”. In this experiment, one-way ANOVA is used to compare differences between groups, and experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

6. The conclusion in the main text should be cautious. The study measured the destruction of DNA and decrease of ATP as two indicators, but did not detect the genes related to apoptosis and necrosis pathways at the gene or protein level, and the evidence is insufficient.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have revised the discussion and conclusions. Please see “Discussion and Conclusion”.

7. Please note the language modifications, for example, the ℃ for line 117 is not Times New Roman; there are errors in the references in line 252, etc.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have revised the total manuscrip.

8. Please improve the clarity of the images and the aesthetics of the layout. The layout of Figure 2 is not very attractive; please reformat it. Figure 3 only has one image; it is recommended to combine it with other suitable images. In Figure 5A, the arrow marking for GC was not found. Additionally, the markings for Co and GL are not very clear; it is suggested to change the font color for better readability. It is recommended to explain the meaning of the triangle in the B/C/D images and the red arrows in the notes for Figure 5. In Figure 6, the B image does not indicate statistical differences, and the concentration of Cd2+ treatment is also not marked.

Answer: In accordance with the reviewers' comments, we have revised Figures 2,5 and 6, and the figure legends have also been modified accordingly. Please see “Figures” and “Figure captions”

Reviewer #2: This study investigates the toxicological effects of cadmium (Cd²⁺) exposure in freshwater crabs (Sinopotamon henanense), with a particular focus on the underlying signaling pathways involved. Crabs were exposed to Cd²⁺ concentrations of 0, 14.5, 29, and 58 mg/L for four days. The results showed that Cd²⁺ exposure activates both the DAG–PKC and IP3–Ca²⁺ signaling pathways in gill tissue, as evidenced by elevated cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ levels and increased PKC activity. Furthermore, Cd²⁺ exposure also upregulated six stress-related genes (CYP450, BAG3, PDI, Hsp21, Hsp27, and Hsp70), suggesting involvement in detoxification and protein folding. Histological analysis revealed gill damage, including filament swelling and epidermal cell death. Additionally, DNA fragmentation and reduced ATP content were observed, potentially contributing to apoptosis and necrosis.

In conclusion, this study provides mechanistic insights into Cd²⁺-induced cellular injury in aquatic invertebrates, highlighting dual-pathway activation, oxidative stress, and disrupted energy metabolism as key contributors. The findings enhance our understanding of cadmium toxicity in freshwater ecosystems and support the study’s relevance to the scope of PLoS ONE. However, the manuscript requires substantial revisions prior to consideration for publication.

Specific comments and suggestions are as follows:

1. The final paragraph of the Introduction should be strengthened by clearly outlining the main objectives and emphasizing its scientific relevance. A more explicit statement of purpose will help readers appreciate the study’s contribution to the field of aquatic toxicology.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have revised the final paragraph of the Introduction.

2. Important methodological details are missing in the Materials and Methods section. Please specify the number of biological replicates per treatment group, clarify whether n = 3 refers to biological or technical replicates, and provide details on DNA extraction and sample preservation protocols. Additionally, indicate whether normality assumptions (e.g., via Shapiro–Wilk tests) were tested prior to applying one-way ANOVA. The use of standard error (SE) rather than standard deviation (SD) to represent variability should also be justified.

Answer: The crabs were exposed to Cd2+ or water treatment for 96 h. The values are the means ± SE of three biological replicates per treatment group. Please see “2.10. Statistical analysis”. The extraction of sample DNA was performed using a DNA purification kit. Firstly, 20 mg of the sample was minced and lysed in a lysis buffer containing proteinase K, followed by centrifugation. The mixture was then eluted twice with an elution buffer, and subsequently, DNA was eluted using deionized water or a hydrophilic elution buffer. The above-described DNA extraction method has been included in the manuscript. Please see “2.8 DNA-fragmentation analysis”. In this experiment, DNA extraction, electrophoresis, and observation were performed directly after sample collection, and the entire experiment was conducted at room temperature. In fact, each experiments were repeated at least five times with similar results in our experiment. But the values are the the means ± SE of three biological replicates per treatment group. I am sorry that normality assumptions (e.g., via Shapiro–Wilk tests) were not tested prior to applying one-way ANOVA.

This experiment used crabs as the research subject, focusing primarily on investigating intracellular signal transduction and cellular stress responses following Cd²⁺ exposure, as well as exploring the toxic mechanism of Cd²⁺ on aquatic organisms. To ensure the reliability and authenticity of experimental data and avoid the impact of individual differences on the results, crabs with consistent body weight, size, sex, and activity level were selected as far as possible. Therefore, in this experiment, the Standard Error (SE) rather than the Standard Deviation (SD) was used to compare the reliability differences of the sample means of different groups.

3. The legend for Figure 3 incorrectly includes the description for Figure 4. Please revise to ensure that each figure legend accurately corresponds to its respective figure.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have made corresponding revisions. Please see “Results, 3.3 and 3.4 ”.

4. The primer sequences used for qPCR were not provide. These should be included in a supplementary table to ensure transparency and allow reproducibility.

Answer: The primer sequences used for qPCR are shown in Table 1.

5. The rationale for selecting 58 mg/L Cd²⁺ for qPCR and histological analyses is unclear. Please clarify whether this concentration was chosen based on observed toxicity, environmental relevance, or previous literature?

Answer: In our previous studies, the effects of continuous Cd²⁺ exposure on the histological structure of gills and cell death were found to be concentration-dependent. The abnormal histopathology was less severe in 14.5 mg/L Cd²⁺ with smaller gill cavity edema compared to the highest Cd²⁺ concentration group, which showed clearly abnormal histopathology. With increasing Cd²⁺ concentrations, crabs exposed to highest concentrations of Cd²⁺ (58 mg/L) contained a large number of apoptotic cells in the gill epithelium (Wang et al., PLoS ONE 2012; Wang et al., PLoS ONE 2013). Crabs exposed to 58 mg/L Cd²⁺ was used in the present study to analyze the cellular signaling pathways activated by Cd²⁺, including PKC activation, gene expression, changes in tissue structure and energy, DNA injury. We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have made corresponding revisions. Please see “Material and methods, 2.2 Sample preparation ”.

6. At 8 hours, both DAG and IP3 levels declined following initial elevation. This pattern warrants further discussion—could it be reflect negative feedback regulation or cellular adaptation? Similarly, the observed downregulation of several genes (PDI, BAG, Hsp27, and Hsp70) at 48 hours should be discussed to better contextualize these transcriptional responses and their implications for Cd²⁺-induced stress mechanisms.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have revised the discussion. Please see “Discussion, 4.1 and 4.2”.

7. In Section 3.5, the current HE-stained images lack sufficient resolution and clarity. Higher-magnification, better-focused images are recommended to improve visualization of pathological changes in gill tissues.

Answer: In our previous studies, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and electron microscopy were used to demonstrate that Cd2+ induces gill damage and cell apoptosis (Wang et al., PLoS ONE 2012; Wang et al., PLoS ONE 2013). In the present experiment, we further verified that the DAG-PKC and IP3-Ca2+ signaling pathway are involved in gene expression and caspase-dependent cell apoptosis. Sorry, the ultrastructural images of cells were not included in this study.

8. Although the Discussion provides a detailed narrative, it lacks clear structure and thematic focus. Introducing subheadings such as “Oxidative Stress,” “Gene Expression,” and “Histological Damage”would improve readability and organization. A more concise and logically structured synthesis of the proposed toxicological mechanisms would further strengthen this section.

Answer: We accepted the reviewer’s suggestion and have revised the discussion section, and added the subheadings. Please see “Discussion”.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to editor.doc

pone.0336415.s003.doc (20.5KB, doc)

Decision Letter 1

Mei Li

27 Oct 2025

Cadmium-induced DAG-PKC/IP3-Ca2+ double signaling pathway and cell injury in gill of freshwater crabs Sinopotamon henanense

PONE-D-25-30435R1

Dear Dr. Jiaxiang Wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support....

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mei Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed my comments raised in a previous round of review. I think that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy..-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mei Li

PONE-D-25-30435R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Wang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Mei Li

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Experimental data.

    (XLS)

    pone.0336415.s001.xls (35.5KB, xls)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to editor.doc

    pone.0336415.s003.doc (20.5KB, doc)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES