Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2026 Apr 10;11(15):23581–23594. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6c02092

Li-Decorated Ti2CF2 MXene for Efficient Solid-State Hydrogen Storage

Bilal Gülseven a, Gokhan Surucu b,*, Ozge Surucu c, Aysenur Gencer d
PMCID: PMC13103757  PMID: 42040476

Abstract

Efficient hydrogen storage is a major challenge for clean energy technologies. This study investigates the potential of Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXene as a hydrogen storage material using density functional theory. Our calculations show that Li atoms bind stably to the Ti2CF2 surface. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations confirm that the Li atoms do not cluster at room temperature due to strong electrostatic repulsion. The material adsorbs hydrogen molecules via a physisorption mechanism, which allows for reversible storage. It is found that double-sided Li decoration significantly improves the performance, achieving a gravimetric capacity of 3.81 wt % (26 H2 molecules). The calculated desorption temperatures indicate that hydrogen can be released under practical conditions. These findings suggest that Li-decorated Ti2CF2 is a mechanically robust and dynamically stable candidate for hydrogen storage applications, offering a balanced trade-off between binding strength and reversibility.


graphic file with name ao6c02092_0018.jpg


graphic file with name ao6c02092_0016.jpg

Introduction

Today’s environmental and energy policies indicate that it is necessary to move away from hydrocarbon-based energy systems rapidly. In particular, the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the limited reserves of fossil fuels have led to the beginning of a global scientific consensus on the urgent need for carbon purification. , Within this paradigm, hydrogen (H2) has emerged not just as an alternative fuel but as an essential vector for sustainable energy economics. ,

Hydrogen has the highest gravimetric energy density of 120 MJ/kg among chemical fuels, which is almost three times higher than methane, , which has a value of 55.6 MJ/kg. In addition, H2 produces water as the only byproduct by its combustion or electrochemical oxidation in fuel cells, eliminating direct carbon emissions. , However, the transition to a hydrogen economy currently holds a major hurdle due to storage, which is a critical technological bottleneck. Hydrogen gas’s low volumetric density (0.0824 kg/m3 in STP) requires significant compression or liquefaction to achieve practical energy densities. , These processes carry serious energy penalties and safety risks. ,−

As a result, solid-state hydrogen storage methods have become very popular as a promising solution to address these concerns. , The storage of hydrogen in nanostructured materials through physisorption offers the potential for high volumetric density at moderate operating conditions and reduces the risks associated with high-pressure tanks. , In recent years, various porous materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and carbon nanostructures, have been extensively investigated. , On the other hand, meeting the strict gravimetric and volumetric capacity values targeted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) presents significant challenges. For this reason, the search for new two-dimensional (2D) materials with superior surface-to-volume ratios and tunable surface chemistries continues. ,

Among the broad family of 2D materials, the MXene (transition metal carbides and nitrides) group has risen as the leading candidate class thanks to their tunable surface chemistry, metallic conductivity, and mechanical flexibility. Titanium-based MXenes such as Ti2C are very interesting for hydrogen storage because Ti is a relatively light transition metal. This key feature is an important requirement for mobile applications.

In addition, the experimental synthesis of MXenes, which is usually obtained by etching the ⟨A⟩ layer from the MAX phases using hydrofluoric acid (HF), inevitably leads to surface functionalization. The resulting material is not naked Ti2C, but instead terminates in functional groups such as O, OH, or F. ,, While these terminations provide thermodynamic stability, they often pose challenges for hydrogen storage. Ti2CF2, a fluorine-terminated MXene, has a highly electronegative and chemically inert surface. This immobility leads to poor physisorption of H2 molecules, with binding energies generally falling below the optimal window (0.2–0.6 eV/H2) required for reversible storage at ambient conditions. ,

In this context, to overcome the tendency of the bare F-terminated surface to bond poorly, surface modification with metal decoration has been proposed as an effective strategy. , Due to their very low atomic mass and high electropositivity, alkali metals, especially lithium (Li), are a strong candidate for this modification.

Decorating Ti2CF2 with Li atoms creates a unique adsorption mechanism. When Li is adsorbed to the MXene surface, significant charge transfer takes place from the Li atom to the underlying Ti2CF2 substrate. This leaves the Li atoms in a cationic state (Li+), which allows multiple H2 molecules to be adsorbed through strong electrostatic polarization. This mechanism not only increases the hydrogen binding energy up to the desired range but also acts as active domains that prevent hydrogen aggregation, significantly enhancing gravimetric capacity. ,

In this work, the hydrogen storage performance of Li-decorated Ti2CF2 is systematically investigated using density functional theory (DFT). In particular, the stability of Li decoration was studied for the prevention of metal aggregation. In addition, gravimetric capacities were calculated to assess whether this system could meet the practical hydrogen storage targets of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

Computational Details

In this study, the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXene has been investigated using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) , based on density functional theory. The electron–electron interactions have been considered using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), while the electron–ion interactions have been considered using the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method. , The calculations have been performed with an energy cutoff of 530 eV, and the energy and force convergence criteria have been employed as 10–7 eV per unit cell and 10–6 eV/Å, respectively. The Ti2CF2 MXenes have been optimized using 15 × 15 × 1 gamma-centered k-points, while Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes and H2-adsorbed Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes have been optimized using 4 × 4 × 1 gamma-centered k-points. The D3 algorithm has been employed for the van der Waals correction in the calculations, while it is imperative to create a vacuum space that is 15 Å in order to prevent interactions between the layers. The Bader partial charge calculations have been executed through utilization of VASP, while the subsequent analysis has been conducted employing the algorithm devised by Henkelman et al., which is founded upon Bader’s proposal. The elastic constants have been calculated using the energy-strain method using the ELASTOOL program. , The determination of the H2 positions has been facilitated by implementing the Cap Like Initial Conditions (CLICH) algorithm. For the purposes of the present algorithm, it is assumed that the bond length of the H2 molecule is 0.74 Å, as established by experimental research. The values for θ, z max, and r up are set to 45°, 3 Å, and 1 Å respectively, for n = 1–5. In the systems under consideration for the n ≥ 6, the radial distance between the H2 molecules is fixed at h = 1.3 Å, as opposed to the fixed radius (r up). Visualizations of the crystal structures and the respective electronic band structures are obtained by utilizing the VESTA program and the Sumo tools.

To assess the thermal stability of the Li-decorated structures at room temperature, the ab initio molecular dynamics calculations are carried out under zero pressure. A Langevin thermostat , is used with the following atomic frictions for Ti, C, F, and Li atoms and lattice frictions, respectively: 10, 3, 5, 3, and 4 ps–1. The Verlet algorithm is applied to integrate the equations of motion related to the ions with a time step of 1 fs. The AIMD calculations are both computationally expensive and time-consuming, so the machine-learned force field (MLFF) implemented in VASP , is encouraged. The descriptors based on the Gaussian representation of atomic distributions , are used for the description of the machine-learned potential energy surface. In addition, reliable estimates of the target properties, including energy, forces, and stress tensor components, are obtained using Bayesian linear regression. ,

Results and Discussion

Structural and Stability Considerations for Ti2CF2 MXene

The Ti2CF2 MXenes have been obtained through a two-step process. First, aluminum atoms are removed from the Ti2AlC MAX phase by etching. Second, fluorine atoms are added to the surface for surface functionalization. In the present study, F atoms were chosen for surface functionalization on the basis that the most stable structure in the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB) , was obtained by functionalizing with F. Figure illustrates the crystal structure of the Ti2CF2 MXenes from different perspectives, and Table lists the lattice parameter obtained from the optimized structure. The optimized lattice constant for the Ti2CF2 MXene is consistent with the literature as listed in Table . The vacuum space for this MXene is taken as 19.8 Å. Formation energy constitutes a significant parameter in determining the thermodynamic stability of a given material. The formation energy for the Ti2CF2 MXene was calculated using the equation outlined in ref and is provided in Table . According to the data presented in Table , the negative value obtained for the formation energy indicates this material’s thermodynamic stability. In addition to thermodynamic stability, the mechanical stability of the material under scrutiny is determined through the calculation of its elastic constants. In the case of a hexagonal 2D lattice, the elastic constants required are referred to as C 11 and C 12. It is vital to ensure that these constants satisfy the Born stability criteria. , As demonstrated in Table , it is evident that the criteria are both met, i.e., C 11 > 0 and C 11 > |C 12|. , Consequently, the material has been demonstrated to exhibit both mechanical and thermodynamic stability. The Young’s modulus represents a material’s capacity for resistance to being stretched, and the Ti;2CF2 MXene has a high Young’s modulus value. It is imperative to note that the shear modulus of a material is indicative of its resistance to shear stress; thus, the Ti2CF2 MXene is exhibiting a moderate shear modulus. The Poisson ratio is a property of a material that indicates the degree of contraction in the perpendicular in-plane direction when the material is subjected to stretching along one axis. The Ti2CF2 MXene has low Poisson’s ratio.

1.

1

Crystal structure for the Ti2CF2 MXene from different perspectives.

1. Optimized Lattice Parameters (a in Å), Formation Energy (E for in eV/Atom), Elastic Constants (C 11 and C 12 in N/m), Young's Modulus (Y 2D in N/m), Shear Modulus (G 2D in N/m), and Poisson’s ratio (ν) for the Ti2CF2 MXene.

a E for   C 11
3.10 –1.61   176.93
3.043
3.048
3.063
C 12 Y 2D G 2D ν
52.10 161.59 62.42 0.29

The dynamical stability of the Ti2CF2 MXene has been the subject of evaluation by means of the linear response method using a 2 × 2 × 1 supercell. As evidenced by Figure , the dynamic stability of the Ti2CF2 MXene is characterized by a lack of imaginary frequencies in its phonon dispersion curves. Furthermore, the phonon density of states (DOS) is examined, while projections are made onto atomic species. Projections indicate that C atoms contribute predominantly to high-frequency vibrational modes, while Ti and F atoms are predominantly present in the low- and midfrequency ranges. The distribution under consideration is indicative of the lighter atomic mass of C.

2.

2

Phonon dispersion curves and phonon DOS for the Ti2CF2 MXenes.

Following these stability considerations, the electronic band structure of the Ti2CF2 MXene is determined, as illustrated in Figure , alongside the partial density of states (PDOS). As demonstrated in the figure, there is an absence of a gap between the valence and conduction bands. Consequently, this material is categorized as a metal. The PDOS plot indicates that the d states of Ti atoms contribute more significantly to the overall PDOS.

3.

3

Electronic band structure and DOS plots for the Ti2CF2 MXenes.

Li Decoration for Ti2CF2 MXene

Metal decoration is a proven strategy for enhancing the hydrogen storage capacity of two-dimensional materials. Therefore, lithium was selected to functionalize the Ti2CF2 monolayer. As illustrated in Figure , three distinct adsorption sites were investigated: Li x (atop the F atom), Li y (atop the Ti atom), and Li z (atop the C atom). Following geometric optimization, the binding energies were calculated using an equation and are summarized in Table alongside the corresponding bond lengths. The results demonstrate that the Li z configuration exhibits the most favorable binding energy of −1.17 eV and the shortest vertical separation. This confirms it as the most energetically stable position. Consequently, the Li z site was selected as the basis for further investigation. Building on this stability, the study was extended to a double-sided decoration strategy as shown in Figure . Structural optimization of this double-sided system confirmed its thermodynamic stability with a binding energy of −1.14 eV/atom. This value is comparable to the one-sided case. The equilibrium distance between the Li atom and the surface is 0.95 Å on both sides. Accordingly, this double-sided configuration was adopted for detailed hydrogen storage analysis.

4.

4

Side and top views of (a) Li x , (b) Li y , and (c) Li z decoration positions (Li atoms are in green color).

2. Binding Energy (E bind in eV/Atom) and the Distance between the Li Atom and the Ti2CF2 MXene (d in Å).

decoration E bind d
Li x –0.47 1.69
Li y –1.04 1.08
Li z –1.17 1.00

5.

5

(a) Side and (b) top views of double-sided Li z decoration.

It is worth noting that the calculated binding energies (−1.17 eV for one-sided and −1.14 eV for double-sided) of the calculated Li z decorations appear to be slightly lower than the cohesive energy of bulk Li (approximately −1.63 eV). Theoretically, this may raise a concern about the potential aggregation of Li atoms rather than the uniform distribution of Li atoms on the surface. However, the significant charge transfer from Li to the surface (as discussed in the Bader charge analysis section, Li+–Li+ between the positively charged Li ions) generates a strong Coulombic repulsion, which prevents clumping. To rigorously verify this hypothesis and ensure the structural integrity of the adsorption under operating conditions, AIMD simulations were performed at 300 K using the MLFF method. The systems were equilibrated by heating from 0 to 300 K over 10 ps (with a 1 fs time step) using a Langevin thermostat. First, the reliability of the MLFF model was confirmed; as shown in Figures S1 and S2 (Supporting Information), both the Bayesian error and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of forces are remarkably low, indicating a well-trained model. The variations of total energy and temperature over the simulation time for one-sided and double-sided Li z decoration are presented in Figure and Figure , respectively. As the figures demonstrate, the total energy and temperature fluctuate within a limited and stable range. Furthermore, the snapshots of the final crystal configurations (insets in Figure and Figure ) reveal no substantial structural deformations or bond breakages. The Li atoms remain dispersed on the Ti2CF2 surface without aggregation or desorption, confirming that both one- and double-sided Li-decorated systems are dynamically stable at room temperature.

6.

6

(a) Total energy and (b) temperature variation over 10,000 fs during AIMD calculations for the one-sided Li z decoration.

7.

7

(a) Total energy and (b) temperature variation over 10,000 fs during AIMD calculations for the double-sided Li z decoration

The electronic properties of the Li z -decorated and double-sided Li z -decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes are the focus of further investigation, along with a charge density difference analysis. The electronic band structures and PDOS plots for these systems are illustrated in Figure . As is evident from the figures, these systems adopt a metallic character. Moreover, the majority of contributions emanate from the d-states of Ti atoms. Figure presents the charge density difference plots for the one-sided and double-sided Li z -decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes. In these images, blue regions denote areas where there is an absence of electrons, whereas yellow regions indicate regions where electrons are present in greater numbers. The phenomenon of charge transfer is driven by their binding interaction, as demonstrated by a clear charge redistribution at the interface between the Li atoms and the Ti2CF2 MXenes. Specifically, electrons are found on the surface fluorine atoms of Ti2CF2 MXenes, while there are fewer electrons around the Li atoms. This finding suggests that Li is able to donate electrons to the surface and that the Ti2CF2 MXene is capable of accepting them. The quantification of these effects necessitated the implementation of a Bader charge analysis. The findings reveal a net charge transfer of approximately |0.90|e in the one-sided configuration and |1.79|e in the double-sided case. This indicates that the Li atoms exist in a cationic state (Li+). Crucially, this strong ionization is vital for preventing metal clustering. Although the calculated binding energies of Li on the one-sided (−1.17 eV/atom) and double-sided (−1.14 eV/atom) cases are lower in magnitude than the cohesive energy of bulk lithium (−1.63 eV), the strong electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged Li+ ions on the surface creates a barrier against aggregation, thereby stabilizing the dispersed decoration. The charge density difference plots (Figure ) visually confirm this accumulation of electrons on the surface fluorine atoms and depletion around the Li sites. This cationic nature of the Li decoration is the primary driver for hydrogen adsorption, facilitating polarization-induced binding of H2 molecules without dissociation.

8.

8

Electronic band structure and DOS plots for the (a) Li z -decorated and (b) double-sided Li z -decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes.

9.

9

Charge density difference visualizations for the (a) Li z -decorated and (b) double-sided Li z -decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes for side and top views (isosurface level = 0.0013 e/Å3).

Hydrogen Storage Studies for the Li-Decorated Ti2CF2 MXene

The hydrogen molecules are adsorbed on the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXene for both one-sided and double-sided decorations in order to determine the hydrogen storage capacities of these systems. The hydrogen molecules' positions are determined using the CLICH algorithm. Figure shows the hydrogen positions for one-sided decoration for a 2 × 2 × 1 boundary. As the number of hydrogen molecules increases, the cap is not well seen; therefore, a 2 × 2 × 1 boundary allows to visualize the hydrogen cap clearly. For the one-sided decoration case, the number of hydrogen molecules increases up to 15 H2. The hydrogen positions for the double-sided decoration are shown in Figure . For the double-sided case, the visualizations are taken from the perspective of the system in order to show both upper and lower hydrogen positions. For this case, the number of hydrogen molecules increases up to 30 H2. The adsorption energy is crucial whether these hydrogen molecules adsorbed on these systems or not. The adsorption energies are listed in Tables and , which are calculated using the equation given in ref . The adsorption energy becomes negative for 14 H2 and 15 H2 for one-sided decoration, while it is for 28 H2 and 30 H2 for the double-sided case. This means that for these H2 adsorptions, the hydrogen molecules are not adsorbed on the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes. The adsorption energy is also used to consider when assessing hydrogen storage applications, with a range of 0.15–0.60 eV/H2 deemed sufficient for practical hydrogen storage systems. This adsorption energy range is set by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and according to the tables, the one-sided decoration has suitable adsorption energies for 7 H2 to 12 H2, while the double-sided decoration has suitable adsorption energies for 14 H2 to 24 H2 according to the tables. Tables and also list the minimum and maximum distance between the Li atom and H atoms and the hydrogen bond lengths. The distance between the Li atom and H atoms increases as the number of adsorbed hydrogen molecules increases for both one-sided and double-sided decorations. Also, the bond length for H2 molecules slightly decreases as the number of adsorbed hydrogen molecules increases for both one-sided and double-sided decorations.

10.

10

Optimized hydrogen positions for (a) 1H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (b) 2H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (c) 3H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (d) 4H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (e) 5H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (f) 6H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (g) 7H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (h) 8H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (i) 9H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (j) 10H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (k) 11H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (l) 12H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (m) 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, (n) 14H2/Li z -Ti2CF2, and (o) 15H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 systems (H atoms are in pink color.)

11.

11

Optimized hydrogen positions for (a) 2H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (b) 4H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (c) 6H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (d) 8H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (e) 10H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (f) 12H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (g) 14H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (h) 16H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (i) 18H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (j) 20H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (k) 22H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (l) 24H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (m) 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, (n) 28H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2, and (o) 30H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems

3. Adsorption Energy (E ads in eV), the Distance between a H Atom and the Li Atom (d H–Li in Å), and the Average Hydrogen Bond Length (d H–H in Å) for nH2/Li z -Ti2CF2 Systems.

    d H–Li
 
nH 2 E ads min max d H–H
1H2 0.79 2.90 3.10 0.74
2H2 0.79 3.00 3.09 0.74
3H2 0.78 3.09 3.26 0.74
4H2 0.74 3.18 3.39 0.74
5H2 0.75 3.41 3.61 0.74
6H2 0.70 3.58 3.72 0.73
7H2 0.65 3.74 3.86 0.73
8H2 0.71 4.25 4.30 0.73
9H2 0.61 4.21 4.25 0.72
10H2 0.47 4.29 4.30 0.72
11H2 0.24 4.35 4.34 0.72
12H2 0.27 4.61 4.66 0.72
13H2 0.12 4.65 4.88 0.73
14H2 –0.16 4.73 5.02 0.71
15H2 –0.39 4.41 5.46 0.71

4. Adsorption Energy (E ads in eV), the Distance between a H Atom and a Li Atom (d H–Li in Å), and the Average Hydrogen Bond Length (d H–H in Å) for nH2/Double-Sided Li z -Ti2CF2 Systems.

    d H–Li
 
nH 2 E ads min max d H–H
2H2 0.79 2.91 3.04 0.74
4H2 0.78 3.03 3.13 0.74
6H2 0.78 3.14 3.32 0.74
8H2 0.74 3.21 3.44 0.74
10H2 0.74 3.40 3.62 0.74
12H2 0.73 3.65 3.81 0.74
14H2 0.61 3.71 3.84 0.73
16H2 0.63 3.98 4.08 0.73
18H2 0.55 4.15 4.21 0.73
20H2 0.62 4.36 4.73 0.73
22H2 0.43 4.55 4.57 0.72
24H2 0.31 4.67 4.77 0.72
26H2 0.13 4.74 5.00 0.72
28H2 –0.09 4.75 5.23 0.72
30H2 –0.17 4.95 5.35 0.71

A comprehensive study of the electronic properties of Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXenes materials has been conducted. All systems exhibited metallic properties, and the results for 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems are shown in Figure . The figure also includes detailed PDOS curves. As illustrated in Figure , the predominant contribution to the PDOS originates from the d orbitals of the Ti atom. Furthermore, the contribution of the s orbital of the H atom is observed in the range of −2 to −3 eV. The charge density difference plots for the 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems are shown in Figure . As illustrated in Figure , a discernible charge depletion is evident around the Li decoration, accompanied by charge accumulation surrounding the adsorbed H2 molecules. This phenomenon is indicative of electron transfer from Li to H2 molecules and, consequently, polarization of the H–H bond without dissociation. In the single-sided case, the charge distribution is localized, consistent with moderate and reversible physical adsorption of H2. In the double-sided configuration, the charge distribution becomes more pronounced and continuous due to higher H2 adsorption, but H2 molecules remain intact in this system, confirming that the interaction remains in the desired polarization-focused physical adsorption regime. It has been demonstrated that the combination of charge density difference plots and Bader charge analysis provides a comprehensive and consistent picture of the hydrogen adsorption mechanism on the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 surface. The Bader charges of Li atoms have been determined to be +0.90|e| and +1.79|e| for one-sided and double-sided cases, respectively. This finding is in agreement with the observed charge density difference plots. The Ti atoms exhibit a charge depletion phenomenon, characterized by the presence of +27.68|e| and +27.35|e| for one-sided and double-sided cases, respectively. It has been established that C and F atoms function as charge acceptors, with Bader charges of −15.24|e| and −13.34|e| for one-sided cases and −15.35|e| and −13.78|e| for double-sided cases, respectively. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that hydrogen molecules exhibit minimal net charge transfer, with values of −0.10|e| and +0.10|e| for the one-sided case and −0.22|e| and +0.21|e| for the double-sided case. This suggests that hydrogen molecules predominantly interact via physisorption.

12.

12

Electronic band structure and DOS plots for the (a) 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and (b) 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems.

13.

13

Charge density difference visualizations for the (a) 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and (b) 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems (isosurface level = 0.00008 e/Å3).

Within the domain of research focused on the subject of hydrogen storage, the gravimetric assessment of hydrogen storage capacity represents a pivotal component of research endeavors.

The gravimetric hydrogen storage capacity (C wt %) is a decisive parameter for evaluating the practical applicability of hydrogen storage materials. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has established a technical target of 5.5 wt % for light-duty vehicles by the year 2025. To evaluate the performance of the studied systems, the gravimetric capacity was calculated using eq : ,

Cwt%=nH2mH2(nH2mH2)+mnLiTi2CF2×100 1

where nH2,mH2,andmnLiTi2CF2 are the number of adsorbed hydrogen molecules, the mass of a hydrogen molecule, and the mass of the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 system, respectively.

The calculated hydrogen storage capacities, summarized in Tables and , demonstrate that the double-sided Li decoration strategy significantly enhances performance, effectively doubling the maximum gravimetric capacity from 1.95 wt % (one-sided, 13 H2) to 3.81 wt % (26 H2). Although this value falls short of the stringent 2025 DOE system target of 5.5 wt %, the Ti2CF2 system remains highly competitive when compared to the DFT studies on similar 2D substrates. For instance, while it exhibits a lower theoretical capacity than lightweight carbon-based frameworks like Li-decorated graphyne (up to 18.6 wt %), Ti2CF2 offers superior experimental stability and mechanical robustness. Moreover, it outperforms isostructural heavy-metal MXenes such as Hf2CF2 due to the lighter atomic mass of titanium and provides a comparable capacity window to Y-decorated MoS2 (4.56 wt %) without the complex electronic hybridization issues. These comparisons suggest that while Li-decorated Ti2CF2 is a promising and stable candidate, further structural engineering such as constructing van der Waals heterostructures or increasing the surface area may be required to fully satisfy commercial onboard storage targets.

5. Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacities (C wt %) and Hydrogen Desorption Temperature (T des in K) for nH2/Li z -Ti2CF2 Systems.

nH2 C wt T des
1H2 0.15 588.92
2H2 0.31 587.00
3H2 0.46 577.87
4H2 0.61 548.23
5H2 0.76 555.53
6H2 0.91 520.43
7H2 1.06 482.78
8H2 1.21 529.79
9H2 1.36 456.04
10H2 1.51 346.15
11H2 1.66 176.27
12H2 1.81 203.15
13H2 1.95 88.62

6. Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacities (C wt %) and Hydrogen Desorption Temperature (T des in K) for nH2/Double-Sided Li z -Ti2CF2 Systems.

nH 2 C wt T des
2H2 0.30 583.91
4H2 0.61 581.18
6H2 0.91 575.66
8H2 1.20 553.15
10H2 1.50 549.40
12H2 1.80 544.98
14H2 2.09 454.40
16H2 2.38 464.43
18H2 2.67 409.77
20H2 2.96 457.94
22H2 3.24 316.62
24H2 3.53 232.04
26H2 3.81 97.54

In addition to storage capacity, the operating conditions for hydrogen release are governed by the desorption temperature (T des). This was calculated using eq based on the van’t Hoff relation.

Tdes=(EadsKB)(ΔSRln(P))1 2

where E ads is the adsorption energy, K B is the Boltzmann constant, R is the gas constant, P is the equilibrium pressure (1 atm), and ΔS is the entropy change of hydrogen transition from gas to solid phase (130 J mol–1 K–1).

Tables and present the hydrogen desorption temperatures for the nH2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and nH2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems, respectively. A comprehensive evaluation of the values presented in the aforementioned table has revealed a discernible relationship between the temperature of hydrogen release and the quantity of stored hydrogen within the nH2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and nH2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems. It is evident that as the amount of stored hydrogen increases, the hydrogen release temperatures decrease. It has been established that the lowest recorded temperature at which hydrogen desorption occurs in the nH2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and nH2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems is obtained for 13H2 and 26H2 cases, respectively. This indicates that at maximum capacity, the hydrogen is weakly bound, facilitating release at low temperatures, though cryogenic conditions may be required to maintain full capacity.

It is imperative to consider hydrogen’s adsorption and desorption processes at various temperatures and pressures. In order to obtain the aforementioned quantity, a thermodynamic analysis was performed using the grand canonical partition function Z, as given in eq .

Z=1+i=1ne(Eadsiμ)/kBT 3

where n signifies the maximum number of adsorbed H2 molecules and E ads , μ, and k B correspond to the adsorption energy of the n th adsorbed H2 molecule, the chemical potential of the gas phase of the H2 molecule, and the Boltzmann constant, respectively. μ is dependent on temperature and pressure and can be determined using eq .

μ=ΔH+TΔS+kBTlnPP0 4

In this equation, the enthalpy change, entropy change, pressure, and atmospheric pressure are represented as ΔH, ΔS, P, and P 0, respectively. ΔH + TΔS can be obtained from the experimental database. Equation was utilized to calculate the quantity of stored H2 molecules, with N 0 denoting the maximum number of adsorbed H2 molecules at 0 K.

N=N0[Z1Z] 5

The number of adsorbed H2 molecules for the 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 and 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems is presented as a function of P and T in Figures and , respectively. The figures demonstrate that the H2 molecules are adsorbed at low temperatures and elevated pressures and desorbed at high temperatures and reduced pressures, for both systems.

14.

14

Average number of H2 molecules as a function of pressure and temperature for the 13H2/Li z -Ti2CF2 system.

15.

15

Average number of H2 molecules as a function of pressure and temperature for the 26H2/double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 system.

To evaluate the hydrogen storage performance of the Li-decorated Ti2CF2 systems, a comprehensive comparison with previously reported storage materials is summarized in Table . The calculated average adsorption energies for the Li z -Ti2CF2 and double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 systems (0.12 and 0.13 eV/H2, respectively) fall within the broader literature range of 0.065–1.21 eV/H2. Notably, these values are slightly higher than those reported for other functionalized MXenes such as Y2CF2 (0.080 eV) and Y2CCl2 (0.065 eV), suggesting a relatively more stable adsorption environment in the Ti2CF2 framework. However, they remain lower than transition metal-doped systems like Sc-doped CNR (0.95 eV) and Ti-doped CNR (1.21 eV), which typically exhibit stronger chemisorption-like interactions.

7. Maximum Number of Adsorbed H2 Molecules (n max), Adsorption Energy (|E ads| in eV/H2 Molecule), Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacity (C wt %), and Hydrogen Desorption Temperature (T des in K) for Some Hydrogen Storage Systems.

systems n max | E ads | C wt T des reference
Li z -Ti2CF2 13 0.12 1.95 88.62 this study
double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 26 0.13 3.81 97.54 this study
Y2CF2 36 0.080 3.418  
Y2CCl2 36 0.065 3.000  
Y2C(OH)2 36 0.085 3.477  
Li–Sc3N2 5 0.28 5.9 320
Na–Sc3N2 5 0.137 5.6 320
Ti3C2T x     10.47 77
Sc-doped CNR 32 0.95 6.10 358
Ti-doped CNR 30 1.21 5.49 371
Ca-doped C3N2 22 0.24 7.53 178
Mg-doped C3N2 25 0.24 9.47 141
K-doped C3N2 24 0.19 8.21 178
6Sc–C5N 36 0.2131 5.810  
6Ti–C5N 36 0.2995 5.730  
6V–C5N 36 0.1844 5.647  
Li–C9N4 6 0.20 11.9  
Na–C9N4 6 0.19 8.7  
K–C9N4 7 0.17 8.1  

Regarding storage capacity, the double-sided Li z -Ti2CF2 system achieves a gravimetric capacity of 3.81 wt %. While this is lower than high-capacity benchmarks like Li-C9N4 (11.9 wt %) or Mg-doped C3N2 (9.47 wt %), it is superior to several MXene-based counterparts, including Y2CCl2 (3.00 wt %) and Y2CF2 (3.418 wt %). This highlights that Li decoration on the Ti2CF2 surface effectively enhances the storage density compared to some heavier transition metal MXene systems.

Finally, the hydrogen release characteristics were assessed via the desorption temperature (T des). The literature values for T des vary significantly, ranging from 77 K (for Ti3C2T x ) to 371 K (for Ti-doped CNR). The T des obtained in this study (97.54 K) is comparable to the cryogenic release temperatures observed in Ti3C2T x , though it remains below the ambient temperature threshold (approximately 300 K) required for practical fuel cell applications. This suggests that while the Li z -Ti2CF2 system provides a stable platform for hydrogen uptake, its primary application would currently be suited for cryogenic storage conditions.

Although the present study is founded on first-principles calculations, the experimental realization of Li-decorated Ti2CF2 can be feasible through established top-down and postsynthetic methods. The precursor, Ti2CF2 MXene, can be synthesized by subjecting the Al layer to selective etching from the Ti2AlC MAX phase using hydrofluoric acid (HF) or a mixture of LiF and HCl, which naturally leads to surface terminations with a fluorine (−F) content. In the case of Li decoration, electrochemical intercalation or chemical lithiation can be employed.

Conclusions

In this study, the hydrogen storage performance of Li-decorated Ti2CF2 MXene was systematically investigated using density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. The structural stability analysis confirmed that the Ti2CF2 monolayer is both thermodynamically and mechanically stable. Among the considered adsorption sites, the Li atom was found to be most energetically favorable at the hollow site above the carbon atom (Li z ). Crucially, Bader charge analysis revealed a significant charge transfer from the Li atom to the substrate, leaving the Li adatoms in a cationic state (Li+). This strong ionization, combined with the resultant electrostatic repulsion, effectively prevents metal clustering, a finding further validated by AIMD simulations at 300 K, which showed no aggregation. The hydrogen storage capacity was evaluated for both one-sided and double-sided decoration strategies. The results demonstrated that the Li-decorated systems adsorb hydrogen molecules via a polarization-induced physisorption mechanism, with adsorption energies falling within the ideal range (0.2–0.6 eV/H2) for reversible storage at moderate conditions. While the one-sided decoration yielded a gravimetric capacity of 1.95 wt % (13 H2), the double-sided strategy significantly enhanced this value to 3.81 wt % (26 H2). Although this maximum capacity remains below the ultimate DOE target of 5.5 wt %, the system exhibits superior stability compared to many other theoretical 2D materials and outperforms isostructural heavy-metal MXenes. Furthermore, the desorption temperature calculations suggest that hydrogen release is feasible at manageable temperatures. Consequently, Li-decorated Ti2CF2 stands out as a promising, stable, and reversible medium for hydrogen storage, warranting further experimental verification and structural engineering to maximize its surface area. In the field of experimental research, the focus of future studies should be oriented toward the fabrication of van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures, such as Ti2CF2/graphene, with the objective of impeding the restacking of MXene layers and thereby preserving active surface sites. Furthermore, the development of porous architectures (e.g., 3D printed MXene aerogels) could result in a significant increase in the accessible surface area, thus providing a higher density of Li decoration sites and, consequently, enabling the gravimetric capacity to meet the requirements for mobile applications.

Supplementary Material

ao6c02092_si_001.pdf (333KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

As detailed in this study, the numerical calculations were performed using TRUBA resources at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Centre, and at Istanbul Technical University National Center for High-Performance Computing. This latter institution, which is known as ITU-UHEM, has a grant number for this project of 1024042025.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c02092.

  • MLFF Bayesian error and RMSE of forces for the one-sided and double-sided Li-decorated Ti2CF2 systems (Figures S1 and S2) (PDF)

During the preparation of this work, the authors used Google Gemini in order to enhance the language, clarity, and overall readability of the manuscript. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Dafedar A. A., Verma S. S., Yadav A., Jha K., Gulati P., Tripathi U. K.. Hydrogen Storage Techniques for Stationary and Mobile Applications: A Review. Recent Advances in Sustainable Technologies: Select Proceedings of ICAST;Springer. 2021:29–40. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0976-3_4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kunowsky M., Marco-Lózar J. P., Linares-Solano A.. Material Demands for Storage Technologies in a Hydrogen Economy. Journal of Renewable Energy. 2013;2013:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2013/878329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Munadi F., Supramono D.. Techno-Economic Analysis Of Hydrogen Storage Technologies For Transport Applications. Jurnal Informasi, Sains Dan Teknologi. 2024;7:01–10. doi: 10.55606/isaintek.v7i01.184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tashie-Lewis B. C., Nnabuife S. G.. Hydrogen Production, Distribution, Storage and Power Conversion in a Hydrogen Economy - A Technology Review. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances. 2021;8:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mazloomi K., Gomes C.. Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Prospects and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16:3024–33. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Markiewicz M., Zhang Y. Q., Bösmann A., Brückner N., Thöming J., Wasserscheid P.. et al. Environmental and health impact assessment of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) systems – challenges and preliminary results. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:1035–45. doi: 10.1039/C4EE03528C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schüth F.. Challenges in hydrogen storage. Eur. Phys. J. Spec Top. 2009;176:155–66. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2009-01155-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Profio P., Arca S., Rossi F., Filipponi M.. Comparison of hydrogen hydrates with existing hydrogen storage technologies: Energetic and economic evaluations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:9173–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gupta P., Toksha B., Rahaman M.. A Critical Review on Hydrogen Based Fuel Cell Technology and Applications. Chem. Rec. 2024;24:24. doi: 10.1002/tcr.202300295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zheng J., Wang C. G., Zhou H., Ye E., Xu J., Li Z., Loh X. J.. et al. Current Research Trends and Perspectives on Solid-State Nanomaterials in Hydrogen Storage. Research. 2021:3750689. doi: 10.34133/2021/3750689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nazir G., Rehman A., Hussain S., Aftab S., Heo K., Ikram M.. et al. Recent Advances and Reliable Assessment of Solid-State Materials for Hydrogen Storage: A Step Forward toward a Sustainable H 2 Economy. Adv. Sustain Syst. 2022;6:6. doi: 10.1002/adsu.202200276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang L., Allendorf M. D., Balderas-Xicohténcatl R., Broom D. P., Fanourgakis G. S., Froudakis G. E.. et al. Fundamentals of hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials. Progress in Energy. 2022;4:042013. doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac8d44. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Snurr, R ; Hupp, J ; Kanatzidis, M ; Nguyen, S . New Carbon-Based Porous Materials with Increased Heats of Adsorption for Hydrogen Storage; Northwestern Univ: Golden, CO (United States), 2014. 10.2172/1163140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zacharia R., Rather S. u., Chen Y.. Review of Solid State Hydrogen Storage Methods Adopting Different Kinds of Novel Materials. J. Nanomater. 2015:914845. doi: 10.1155/2015/914845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Archana K., Asif A., Jose D., Sujith R.. MOFs for hydrogen storage. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanomaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage. Elsevier. 2022:589–607. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91179-5.00019-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sutton A. L., Mardel J. I., Hill M. R.. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) As Hydrogen Storage Materials At Near-Ambient Temperature. Chemistry – A. European Journal. 2024;30:30. doi: 10.1002/chem.202400717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yaghi, O. M. ; Goddard, W. A. . A Joint Theory and Experimental Project in the Synthesis and Testing of Porous COFs for On-Board Vehicular Hydrogen Storage; California Institute of Technology: Golden, CO (United States), 2013. 10.2172/1086569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Allendorf M. D., Hulvey Z., Gennett T., Ahmed A., Autrey T., Camp J.. et al. An assessment of strategies for the development of solid-state adsorbents for vehicular hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11:2784–812. doi: 10.1039/C8EE01085D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martins N. F., Laranjeira J. A. S., Azevedo S. A., Fabris G. S. L., Denis P. A., Sambrano J. R.. Two-Dimensional Materials Applied to Hydrogen Storage. 2024:83–115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-75984-0_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu Y., Li Y., Gao L., Liu Y., Ding Z.. Advances and Prospects of Nanomaterials for Solid-State Hydrogen Storage. Nanomaterials. 2024;14:1036. doi: 10.3390/nano14121036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Naguib M., Mochalin V. N., Barsoum M. W., Gogotsi Y.. 25th Anniversary Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:992–1005. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shahzad F., Alhabeb M., Hatter C. B., Anasori B., Man Hong S., Koo C. M., Gogotsi Y.. et al. Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes) Science. 2016;2016(353):1137–1140. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kagalkar, A. ; Dharaskar, S. . 2D-Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides: Prospects and Challenges. In: Chaudhari, N. , editor., 2023; p. 1–42. 10.1021/bk-2023-1445.ch001. [DOI]
  24. Xu W., Sun L., Zhai W., Yang J., Jiang T., Peng J.. Exploring hydrogen adsorption and release in 2D M 2 C-MXenes: structural and functional insights. Nanotechnology. 2025;36:095702. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ad9bb8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Brette F., Kourati D., Paris M., Loupias L., Célérier S., Cabioc’h T.. et al. Assessing the Surface Chemistry of 2D Transition Metal Carbides (MXenes): A Combined Experimental/Theoretical 13 C Solid State NMR Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:4003–14. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tang M., Li J., Wang Y., Han W., Xu S., Lu M.. et al. Surface Terminations of MXene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. Symmetry (Basel) 2022;14:2232. doi: 10.3390/sym14112232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao J., Li W., Feng Y., Li J., Bai G., Xu J.. Sensing mechanism of hydrogen storage on Li, Na and K-decorated Ti2C. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2020;126:945. doi: 10.1007/s00339-020-04123-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang B., Lee H., Duan W., Ihm J.. Hydrogen storage in alkali-metal-decorated organic molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008;93:93. doi: 10.1063/1.2971201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang H., Zhao M., Bu H., He X., Zhang M., Zhao L.. et al. Ultra-high hydrogen storage capacity of Li-decorated graphyne: A first-principles prediction. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;112:112. doi: 10.1063/1.4759235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yin Q., Bi G., Wang R., Zhao Z., Ma K.. High-capacity hydrogen storage in lithium decorated penta-BN2: A first-principles study. J. Power Sources. 2024;591:233814. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kresse G., Furthmüller J.. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996;6:15–50. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kresse G., Furthmüller J.. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:11169. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Blöchl P. E.. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kresse G., Joubert D.. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59:1758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pack J. D., Monkhorst H. J.. “Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations”a reply. Phys. Rev. B. 1977;16:1748. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.1748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Grimme S., Antony J., Ehrlich S., Krieg H.. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010:132. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang W., Sanville E., Henkelman G.. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2009;21:084204. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bader, R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory; Oxford University Press; 1990:438. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ekuma C. E., Liu Z. L.. ElasTool v3.0: Efficient computational and visualization toolkit for elastic and mechanical properties of materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2024;300:109161. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu Z. L., Ekuma C. E., Li W. Q., Yang J. Q., Li X. J.. ElasTool: An automated toolkit for elastic constants calculation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022;270:108180. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Aydin S., Şimşek M.. The enhancement of hydrogen storage capacity in Li, Na and Mg-decorated BC3 graphene by CLICH and RICH algorithms. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44:7354–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen H. T., Choi Y. M., Liu M., Lin M. C.. A Theoretical Study of Surface Reduction Mechanisms of CeO2(111) and (110) by H2. ChemPhysChem. 2007;8:849–55. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200600598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Momma K., Izumi F.. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. Urn:Issn:0021–8898. 2011;44:1272–6. doi: 10.1107/S0021889811038970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. M Ganose A., J Jackson A., O Scanlon D.. sumo: Command-line tools for plotting and analysis of periodic *ab initio* calculations. J. Open Source Softw. 2018;3:717. doi: 10.21105/joss.00717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lemons D. S., Gythiel A.. Paul Langevin’s 1908 paper “On the Theory of Brownian Motion” “Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien,” C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 146, 530–533 (1908). Am. J. Phys. 1997;65:1079–81. doi: 10.1119/1.18725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Evans D. J.. Computer ‘“experiment”’ for nonlinear thermodynamics of Couette flow. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;78:3297–302. doi: 10.1063/1.445195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jinnouchi R., Karsai F., Kresse G.. On-the-fly machine learning force field generation: Application to melting points. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:014105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.014105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jinnouchi R., Karsai F., Verdi C., Asahi R., Kresse G.. Descriptors representing two-and three-body atomic distributions and their effects on the accuracy of machine-learned inter-atomic potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2020:152. doi: 10.1063/5.0009491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Behler J., Parrinello M.. Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:146401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. C. M., Bishop ,Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning; Springer: Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gjerding M. N., Taghizadeh A., Rasmussen A., Ali S., Bertoldo F., Deilmann T.. et al. Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB) 2d Mater. 2021;8:044002. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/ac1059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Haastrup S., Strange M., Pandey M., Deilmann T., Schmidt P. S., Hinsche N. F.. et al. The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2d Mater. 2018;5:042002. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gencer A., Aydin S., Surucu O., Wang X., Deligoz E., Surucu G.. Enhanced hydrogen storage of a functional material: Hf2CF2MXene with Li decoration. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021;551:149484. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang V., Tang G., Liu Y. C., Wang R. T., Mizuseki H., Kawazoe Y., Nara J., Geng W. T.. et al. High-Throughput Computational Screening of Two-Dimensional Semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13:11581–94. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Born, M. ; Huang, K. . Dynamical Theory Of Crystal Lattices. Dyn. Theory Crystal Lattices 1996, 10.1093/OSO/9780192670083.001.0001. [DOI]
  57. Thomas S., Asle Zaeem M.. Phosgene Gas Sensing of Ti2CT2 (T = F–, O–, OH−) MXenes. Adv. Theory Simul. 2021;4:2000250. doi: 10.1002/adts.202000250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kim J., Jeong J., Min K.. Strain engineering in Ti2CX2/WS2 van der Waals heterostructures: First-principles calculations on mechanical robustness and bandgap tunability. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2026;253:166–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2025.07.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang R. Z., Cui H. L., Li X. H.. First-principles study of structural, electronic and optical properties of doped Ti2CF2MXenes. Physica B Condens Matter. 2019;561:90–6. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.02.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen X., Zhang C., Liu Z., Li J., Guo D., Zhang L.. et al. First-principles investigation of high reversible energy storage medium in Li-decorated net-Y. J. Energy Storage. 2024;103:114445. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.114445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Naqvi S. R., Hussain T., Luo W., Ahuja R.. Metallized siligraphene nanosheets (SiC7) as high capacity hydrogen storage materials. Nano Res. 2018;11:3802–3813. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1954-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jin X., Qi P., Yang H., Zhang Y., Li J., Chen H.. Enhanced hydrogen adsorption on Li-coated B12C6N6. J. Chem. Phys. 2016:145. doi: 10.1063/1.4964394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim Y. H., Zhao Y., Williamson A., Heben M. J., Zhang S. B.. Nondissociative Adsorption of H2Molecules in Light-Element-Doped Fullerenes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:016102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.016102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rezaie S., Smeulders D. M. J., Luna-Triguero A.. Enhanced hydrogen storage in gold-doped carbon nanotubes: A first-principles study. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023;476:146525. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. DOE Technical Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage for Light-Duty Vehicles; Department of Energy; n.d. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/doe-technical-targets-onboard-hydrogen-storage-light-duty-vehicles (accessed November 18, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  66. Duan Z., Shi S., Yao C., Hu J., Liu X., Diao K.. et al. Reversible hydrogen storage of Mg-decorated C7N3: A study based on density functional theory. J. Energy Storage. 2025;127:116673. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.116673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zyane M. S., Rghioui H., Achahbar A., Boujibar O., Van F. T., Zanouni M.. et al. A novel lithium-decorated GeC5 monolayer for promising hydrogen storage: A DFT study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2025;114:131–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Guo Y., Jiang K., Xu B., Xia Y., Yin J., Liu Z.. Remarkable Hydrogen Storage Capacity In Li-Decorated Graphyne: Theoretical Predication. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:13837–41. doi: 10.1021/jp302062c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu H., Yang S., Lei G., Xu M., Xu H., Lan Z.. et al. Y-decorated MoS2 monolayer for promising hydrogen storage: A DFT study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47:12096–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Benaddi A., Elomrani A., Khossossi N., Maymoun M., Oukahou S., Etrini A.. et al. First-principles prediction of new stable 2D orthorhombic (o)-B2CN and o-B2C2 materials for hydrogen storage applications via lithium decoration. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2025;127:116–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.389. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ma L. J., Xu J., Wang J., Jia J., Wu H. S.. Hydrogen adsorption on metal-decorated BN atom-pair substituted biphenylene network: A DFT investigation. J. Energy Storage. 2025;114:115889. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.115889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kaewmaraya T., Thatsami N., Tangpakonsab P., Kinkla R., Kotmool K., Menendez C.. et al. Ultrahigh hydrogen storage using metal-decorated defected biphenylene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023;629:157391. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rahimi R., Solimannejad M.. DFT investigation of reversible hydrogen storage employing Li-decorated δ-5 boron monolayers. Mater. Sci. Semicond Process. 2025;199:109818. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hashmi A., Farooq M. U., Khan I., Son J., Hong J.. Ultra-high capacity hydrogen storage in a Li decorated two-dimensional C2N layer. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2017;5:2821–8. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08924K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Thanasarnsurapong T., Sringamprom S., Sirisaksoontorn W., Jungthawan S., Kaewmaraya T., Boonchun A.. Reversible hydrogen storage in Y2C MXene under the influence of functional groups (F, Cl, OH) Scientific Reports 2024 14:1. 2024;14:24971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75662-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rezaie S., Hussain T., Bae H., Smith E., Luna-Triguero A.. Exploring the Role of Transition Metal Doping in Enhancing Hydrogen Storage Performance of Carbon Nanoribbon. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2026;222:154156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kaur S. P., Hussain T., Kaewmaraya T., Kumar T. J. D.. Reversible hydrogen storage tendency of light-metal (Li/Na/K) decorated carbon nitride (C9N4) monolayer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48:26301–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Dorji G., Peden S., Hasan S. F., Aguey-Zinsou F., Hussain T.. Computational analysis of light metal decorated C3N2 monolayers for efficient hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2026;216:153641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ghotia S., Kumar A., Sudarsan V., Dwivedi N., Singh S., Kumar P.. Multilayered Ti3C2Tx MXenes: A prominent materials for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024;52:100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tayyab A., Shakil M., ur Rehman N., Gillani S. S. A., Ahmed I. A., Kallel M.. Exploring reversible hydrogen storage capacity of Li and Na metal-decorated Sc3N2 monolayer via DFT calculations. J. Energy Storage. 2025;112:115489. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.115489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kerdsombut P., Latthiwan P., Thatsami N., Reunchan P., Boonchun A., Hussain T.. et al. Revealing the reversible hydrogen storage potential of light transition-metal decorated organic C5N monolayers. J. Energy Storage. 2026;143:119608. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.119608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao6c02092_si_001.pdf (333KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES