Skip to main content
Advanced Science logoLink to Advanced Science
. 2026 Mar 23;13(23):e74877. doi: 10.1002/advs.74877

Correction to “Melatonin Modulates Glucose Metabolism Reprogramming via Targeting G6PD to Alleviate Lead‐Induced Hepatocytes Pyroptosis in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)”

PMCID: PMC13104113  PMID: 41867065

Zhiying Miao, Xiaofeng Ji, Lai Wei, Zhiruo Miao, Shiwen Xu*. Melatonin Modulates Glucose Metabolism Reprogramming via Targeting G6PD to Alleviate Lead‐Induced Hepatocytes Pyroptosis in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.).

DOI: 10.1002/advs.202501041. Adv. Sci., November 2025, 12(41), e01041.

During assembly of the PAS staining image, an inappropriate field of view was selected. As a result, the high‐magnification inset was not fully contained within the low‐magnification overview, causing misalignment. The corrected image 3(G) is shown below.

graphic file with name ADVS-13-e74877-g003.jpg

Figure 3 (G) PAS staining of carp liver (Scale bar = 50 µm/20 µm in upper/lower panel).

Corrected Figure 3 is provided below.

graphic file with name ADVS-13-e74877-g004.jpg

Figure 3. Mel targets G6PD to alleviate Pb‐induced lactate accumulation. A) The results of GSEA enrichment in the transcriptomics of carp liver. B) The content of crucial glucose metabolism‐related metabolites and enzymes (n = 6) by one‐way ANOVA. C) The related pathway of glucose metabolism. D) The enrichment of metabolites was analyzed by targeted metabolomics. E) The expression of glycolysis‐related genes in carp liver. F) Protein levels of glycolytic‐related genes in vitro. G) PAS staining of carp liver (Scale bar = 50 µm/20 µm in upper/lower panel). H) IHC of anti‐G6PD staining (Scale bar = 50 µm/20 µm in upper/lower panel). I) Molecular docking prediction of Mel targeting G6PD. J) CETSA results G6PD and Mel. K) CETSA results of G6PD in vitro. L) Statistic results of CETSA. M) Protein level of G6PD in the si G6PD models with Pb and/or Mel treatment. N) The content of G6PD in vitro models (n = 6) by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. O) Lactate content in vitro (n = 6) by one‐way ANOVA.

During the assembly of Figure 4B, the protein bands were misaligned with their experimental groups. The corrected image 4(B) is provided below.

graphic file with name ADVS-13-e74877-g002.jpg

Figure 4 (B) The lactylation modification in vitro.

Corrected Figure 4 is provided below.

graphic file with name ADVS-13-e74877-g001.jpg

Figure 4. Mel improves Pb‐mediated mitochondrial oxidative stress by alleviating H3K18 lactylation. A) The lactylation modification of carp liver. B) The lactylation modification in vitro. C) The alter of lactylation modification in vitro models using Oxalate as glycolysis inhibitor. D) The lactylation modification changes in si G6PD models. E) Oxidative stress‐related enrichment of GSEA in the liver transcriptome of carp. F) The content of ROS and activities of the CAT, T‐AOC, SOD, iNOS in liver tissues (n = 6) by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. G) the content of oxidative stress indicators (n = 6). I) Relative mtROS levels in cell models (n = 6). J) Relative mtATP levels in vitro (n = 6). K) MitoSOX Red staning of cell models (Scale bar = 20 µm).

The authors apologize for this error and for the inconvenience it may have caused.


Articles from Advanced Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES