Owing to a Publisher error, one or more mandatory statements were not included in the published versions of the following articles, that appeared in previous issues of Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.
The appropriate missing statements, for each article are provided below.
-
1.
“Prospective study of the functional and radiological outcome of subtrochanteric femur fractures treated by long proximal femoral nailing in lateral decubitus position” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102842) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102842
Patient consent statement: Detailed informed consent was taken from all patients prior to enrolment in the study. Informed Consent has been obtained from all patients for the study's participation and publication.
Ethical approval statement: Ethics committee approval obtained from:
Ethics committee name: Institutional ethics committee, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Letter no.: IGGMC/PHARM/BORS/709-10/2021
Date of approval: 14.05.2021
-
2.
“Patient experiences with a smartphone application dedicated to postoperative recovery after elective arthroplasty” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102557) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102557
Patient consent statement: Informed verbal consent was obtained from all survey participants prior to participation in the telephone survery and inclusion of their responses.
Acknowledgement: None.
-
3.
“Avascular necrosis of femoral head – Demographic profile, natural history of asymptomatic hips and native hip survivorship in an indian subcontinent cohort” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102801) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102801
Patient consent statement: Patient informed consent not applicable due to retrospective study.
Funding statement: None.
-
4.
“Measurable progression of giant cell tumour of bone associated with pregnancy - A tertiary sarcoma centre analysis” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102825) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102825
Patient consent statement: Individual patient consent not obtained.
Ethical approval statement: Registered as an institutional audit. Local ethical committee approval obtained.
Acknowledgement: None.
-
5.
“Takeout or delivery? Reoperation rates in lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis treated with debridement and local antibiotic delivery systems” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102839) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102839
Patient consent statement: Institutional review board exemption was granted as provided data were de-identified and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act” therefor no patient consent was needed.
-
6.
“Metal backed glenoid vs all polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty, a narrative review” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102838) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102838
Patient consent statement: Patient consent not required
Ethical approval statement: This is an invited literature review therefore no ethical approval required
Funding statement: None.
Acknowledgement: None.
Abstract:
All polyethylene glenoids (PEG) were the original glenoid component used in Total
Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA), introduced by Neer in an attempt to improve upon the
results of shoulder hemiarthroplasty. However, as time progressed concerns
surrounding the implant's longevity emerged. In particular this involved the appearance of radiolucent lines around the glenoid component and also glenoid component loosening with eventual failure. As a consequence, alternative techniques for its application have been developed along with design modifications over time. Not only this, the design of alternative components, primarily the metal backed glenoid (MBG) and hybrid glenoid (HG) components have also been developed in an attempt to improve TSA performance and longevity.
In this review we provide a comprehensive summary of the literature surrounding these implants, primarily ranging from the initial PEG and the introduction of MBG, to the most current work available with HG components. We also include an element of surgical technique discussion along with providing a review of component design
characteristics/modifications that ultimately may not have been successful in improving TSA to ensure the reader is provided with a comprehensive review covering successes and non-successes in the field. This provides a narrative encapsulating the progression of glenoid components used in TSA from its origin to the current concepts used in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty today.
Keywords: Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, Glenoid, All Polyethylene Glenoid, Metal Backed Glenoid, Hybrid Glenoid
-
7.
“Optimizing surgical management of acetabulum fractures involving both columns using buttress plating of posterior column through AIP approach” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 59 (2024): 102837) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102837
Patient consent statement: Written informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval statement: All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India. Approval number: MGMCH/IEC/JPR/2021/503
Funding statement: None.
Acknowledgement: None.
-
8.
“Minimum twenty-year follow-up of fixed-vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double blinded randomized trial” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 60 (2025): 102864) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102864
Clinical Trial number: The ClinicalTrials.gov ID is NCT03731676.
-
9.
“Complications following shoulder arthroplasty: A review of the recent literature” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 60 (2025): 102850) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102850
Patient consent statement: Not applicable.
Ethical approval statement: Not applicable.
Funding statement: None.
Acknowledgement: None.
-
10.
“Integrative surgical approach for complex transverse-posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum: A case series of 21 patients evaluating mid-term outcomes” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 60 (2025): 102851) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102851
Patient consent statement: Not applicable.
Ethical approval statement: Ethical board approval was obtained.
Funding statement: None.
Acknowledgement: None.
-
11.
“Total HIP Arthroplasty in a dysplastic HIP with proximal femoral focal deficiency” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 62 (2025): 102908) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102908
Abstract:
Proximal femoral focal deficiency(PFFD) is a rare congenital disorder with an incidence of 1.1–2.0 in 100,000 live births. Patients may present with a painful and arthritic hip and limb shortening during adulthood. There have been three isolated case reports regarding THA in PFFD in Aitken Type A PFFD in patients above age 40. This case highlights the challenges encountered while performing a THA in PFFD. She had not been previously operated during childhood. Her affected lower limb limb was short by 31 cm and it ended at the level of the contralateral knee. Her femur had a shepherd crook deformity proximally for which a subtrochanteric lateral closing wedge osteotomy was performed and modular S-ROM stem had to be used. Total Hip Arthroplasty is an optimal solution to restore mobility in adult PFFD patients. We recommend a posterior approach, use of uncemented modular stems and subtrochanteric shortening.
Keywords: PFFD; Total hip replacement; Subtrochanteric Osteotomy; S-ROM; Complex Arthroplasty
-
12.
“Approach to junctional fractures in spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis
” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 62 (2025): 102900) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102900
Patient consent statement: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis based solely on previously published data; therefore, patient consent was not required.
-
13.
“Lateralisation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty – A narrative review
” (Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 62 (2025): 102881) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102881
Ethical approval statement: This was an invited review article, and no patient data was used. Hence there was no need for ethical approval.